aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/docs/results/os-odl_l2-nofeature-ha.rst
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJingLu5 <lvjing5@huawei.com>2016-09-21 17:38:04 +0800
committerJingLu5 <lvjing5@huawei.com>2016-09-21 17:38:04 +0800
commit090d493c2247ee63c9f9509191b011d2ecfa921f (patch)
tree9f294b71a6b995a4a5e68d6793f0ffb40ad9adc7 /docs/results/os-odl_l2-nofeature-ha.rst
parent4a64b9f48f6fad2c7a74ba6d8278a521f8920521 (diff)
Refine release note & Update scenario test results
JIRA: YARDSTICK-351 JIRA: YARDSTICK-354 Also fix a error in Yardstick_task_templates.rst Change-Id: Id9d091fce3afa7b0f62a08dfd6bca504aeaac805 Signed-off-by: JingLu5 <lvjing5@huawei.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'docs/results/os-odl_l2-nofeature-ha.rst')
-rw-r--r--docs/results/os-odl_l2-nofeature-ha.rst240
1 files changed, 236 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/docs/results/os-odl_l2-nofeature-ha.rst b/docs/results/os-odl_l2-nofeature-ha.rst
index 53b1c11fe..ac0c5bb59 100644
--- a/docs/results/os-odl_l2-nofeature-ha.rst
+++ b/docs/results/os-odl_l2-nofeature-ha.rst
@@ -11,6 +11,238 @@ Test Results for os-odl_l2-nofeature-ha
:maxdepth: 2
+apex
+====
+
+.. _Grafana: http://testresults.opnfv.org/grafana/dashboard/db/yardstick-main
+.. _POD1: https://wiki.opnfv.org/pharos?&#community_test_labs
+
+Overview of test results
+------------------------
+
+See Grafana_ for viewing test result metrics for each respective test case. It
+is possible to chose which specific scenarios to look at, and then to zoom in
+on the details of each run test scenario as well.
+
+All of the test case results below are based on 4 scenario test runs, each run
+on the LF POD1_ between September 14 and 17 in 2016.
+
+TC002
+-----
+The round-trip-time (RTT) between 2 VMs on different blades is measured using
+ping. Most test run measurements result on average between 0.49 ms and 0.60 ms.
+Only one test run has reached greatest RTT spike of 0.93 ms. Meanwhile, the
+smallest network latency is 0.33 ms, which is obtained on Sep. 14th.
+SLA set to be 10 ms. The SLA value is used as a reference, it has not been
+defined by OPNFV.
+
+TC005
+-----
+The IO read bandwidth actually refers to the storage throughput, which is
+measured by fio and the greatest IO read bandwidth of the four runs is 416
+MB/s. The IO read bandwidth of all four runs looks similar, with an average
+between 128 and 131 MB/s. One of the runs has a minimum BW of 497 KB/s. The SLA
+of read bandwidth sets to be 400 MB/s, which is used as a reference, and it has
+not been defined by OPNFV.
+
+The results of storage IOPS for the four runs look similar with each other. The
+IO read times per second of the four test runs have an average value at 1k per
+second, and meanwhile, the minimum result is only 45 times per second.
+
+TC010
+-----
+The tool we use to measure memory read latency is lmbench, which is a series of
+micro benchmarks intended to measure basic operating system and hardware system
+metrics. The memory read latency of the four runs is between 1.0859 ns and
+1.0869 ns on average. The variations within each test run are quite different,
+some vary from a large range and others have a small change. For example, the
+largest change is on September 14th, the memory read latency of which is ranging
+from 1.091 ns to 1.086 ns. However.
+The SLA sets to be 30 ns. The SLA value is used as a reference, it has not been
+defined by OPNFV.
+
+TC011
+-----
+Packet delay variation between 2 VMs on different blades is measured using
+Iperf3. On the first two test runs the reported packet delay variation varies between
+0.0037 and 0.0740 ms, with an average delay variation between 0.0096 ms and 0.0321.
+On the second date the delay variation varies between 0.0063 and 0.0096 ms, with
+an average delay variation of 0.0124 - 0.0141 ms.
+
+TC012
+-----
+Lmbench is also used to measure the memory read and write bandwidth, in which
+we use bw_mem to obtain the results. Among the four test runs, the trend of
+three memory bandwidth almost look similar, which all have a narrow range, and
+the average result is 19.88 GB/s. Here SLA set to be 15 GB/s. The SLA value is
+used as a reference, it has not been defined by OPNFV.
+
+TC014
+-----
+The Unixbench is used to evaluate the IaaS processing speed with regards to
+score of single cpu running and parallel running. It can be seen from the
+dashboard that the processing test results vary from scores 3754k to 3831k, and
+there is only one result one date. No SLA set.
+
+TC037
+-----
+The amount of packets per second (PPS) and round trip times (RTT) between 2 VMs
+on different blades are measured when increasing the amount of UDP flows sent
+between the VMs using pktgen as packet generator tool.
+
+Round trip times and packet throughput between VMs can typically be affected by
+the amount of flows set up and result in higher RTT and less PPS throughput.
+
+The mean packet throughput of the four test runs is between 307.3 kpps and
+447.1 kpps, of which the result of the third run is the highest. The RTT
+results of all the test runs keep flat at approx. 15 ms. It is obvious that the
+PPS results are not as consistent as the RTT results.
+
+The No. flows of the four test runs are 240 k on average and the PPS results
+look a little waved since the largest packet throughput is 418.1 kpps and the
+minimum throughput is 326.5 kpps respectively.
+
+There are no errors of packets received in the four runs, but there are still
+lost packets in all the test runs. The RTT values obtained by ping of the four
+runs have the similar average vaue, that is approx. 15 ms.
+
+CPU load is measured by mpstat, and CPU load of the four test runs seem a
+little similar, since the minimum value and the peak of CPU load is between 0
+percent and nine percent respectively. And the best result is obtained on Sep.
+1, with an CPU load of nine percent. But on the whole, the CPU load is very
+poor, since the average value is quite small.
+
+TC069
+-----
+With the block size changing from 1 kb to 512 kb, the memory write bandwidth
+tends to become larger first and then smaller within every run test, which
+rangs from 28.2 GB/s to 29.5 GB/s and then to 29.2 GB/s on average. Since the
+test id is one, it is that only the INT memory write bandwidth is tested. On
+the whole, when the block size is 2 kb or 16 kb, the memory write bandwidth
+look similar with a minimal BW of 25.8 GB/s and peak value of 28.3 GB/s. And
+then with the block size becoming larger, the memory write bandwidth tends to
+decrease. SLA sets to be 7 GB/s. The SLA value is used as a reference, it has
+not been defined by OPNFV.
+
+TC070
+-----
+The amount of packets per second (PPS) and round trip times (RTT) between 2 VMs
+on different blades are measured when increasing the amount of UDP flows sent
+between the VMs using pktgen as packet generator tool.
+
+Round trip times and packet throughput between VMs can typically be affected by
+the amount of flows set up and result in higher RTT and less PPS throughput.
+
+The network latency is measured by ping, and the results of the four test runs
+look similar with each other, and within these test runs, the maximum RTT can
+reach 39 ms and the average RTT is usually approx. 15 ms. The network latency
+tested on Sep. 1 and Sep. 8 have a peak latency of 39 ms. But on the whole,
+the average RTTs of the five runs keep flat and the network latency is
+relatively short.
+
+Memory utilization is measured by free, which can display amount of free and
+used memory in the system. The largest amount of used memory is 267 MiB for the
+four runs. In general, the four test runs have very large memory utilization,
+which can reach 257 MiB on average. On the other hand, for the mean free memory,
+the four test runs have the similar trend with that of the mean used memory.
+In general, the mean free memory change from 233 MiB to 241 MiB.
+
+Packet throughput and packet loss can be measured by pktgen, which is a tool
+in the network for generating traffic loads for network experiments. The mean
+packet throughput of the four test runs seem quite different, ranging from
+305.3 kpps to 447.1 kpps. The average number of flows in these tests is
+240000, and each run has a minimum number of flows of 2 and a maximum number
+of flows of 1.001 Mil. At the same time, the corresponding average packet
+throughput is between 354.4 kpps and 381.8 kpps. In summary, the PPS results
+seem consistent. Within each test run of the four runs, when number of flows
+becomes larger, the packet throughput seems not larger at the same time.
+
+TC071
+-----
+The amount of packets per second (PPS) and round trip times (RTT) between 2 VMs
+on different blades are measured when increasing the amount of UDP flows sent
+between the VMs using pktgen as packet generator tool.
+
+Round trip times and packet throughput between VMs can typically be affected by
+the amount of flows set up and result in higher RTT and less PPS throughput.
+
+The network latency is measured by ping, and the results of the four test runs
+look similar with each other. Within each test run, the maximum RTT is only 42
+ms and the average RTT is usually approx. 15 ms. On the whole, the average
+RTTs of the four runs keep stable and the network latency is relatively small.
+
+Cache utilization is measured by cachestat, which can display size of cache and
+buffer in the system. Cache utilization statistics are collected during UDP
+flows sent between the VMs using pktgen as packet generator tool. The largest
+cache size is 212 MiB, which is same for the four runs, and the smallest cache
+size is 75 MiB. On the whole, the average cache size of the four runs look the
+same and is between 197 MiB and 211 MiB. Meanwhile, the tread of the buffer
+size keep flat, since they have a minimum value of 7 MiB and a maximum value of
+8 MiB, with an average value of about 7.9 MiB.
+
+Packet throughput can be measured by pktgen, which is a tool in the network for
+generating traffic loads for network experiments. The mean packet throughput of
+the four test runs differ from 354.4 kpps to 381.8 kpps. The average number of
+flows in these tests is 240k, and each run has a minimum number of flows of 2
+and a maximum number of flows of 1.001 Mil. At the same time, the corresponding
+packet throughput differ between 305.3 kpps to 447.1 kpps. Within each test run
+of the four runs, when number of flows becomes larger, the packet throughput
+seems not larger in the meantime.
+
+TC072
+-----
+The amount of packets per second (PPS) and round trip times (RTT) between 2 VMs
+on different blades are measured when increasing the amount of UDP flows sent
+between the VMs using pktgen as packet generator tool.
+
+Round trip times and packet throughput between VMs can typically be affected by
+the amount of flows set up and result in higher RTT and less PPS throughput.
+
+The RTT results are similar throughout the different test dates and runs
+between 0 ms and 42 ms with an average leatency of less than 15 ms. The PPS
+results are not as consistent as the RTT results, for the mean packet
+throughput of the four runs differ from 354.4 kpps to 381.8 kpps.
+
+Network utilization is measured by sar, that is system activity reporter, which
+can display the average statistics for the time since the system was started.
+Network utilization statistics are collected during UDP flows sent between the
+VMs using pktgen as packet generator tool. The largest total number of packets
+transmitted per second look similar for three test runs, whose values change a
+lot from 10 pps to 501 kpps. While results of the rest test run seem the same
+and keep stable with the average number of packets transmitted per second of 10
+pps. However, the total number of packets received per second of the four runs
+look similar, which have a large wide range of 2 pps to 815 kpps.
+
+In some test runs when running with less than approx. 251000 flows the PPS
+throughput is normally flatter compared to when running with more flows, after
+which the PPS throughput decreases. For the other test runs there is however no
+significant change to the PPS throughput when the number of flows are
+increased. In some test runs the PPS is also greater with 251000 flows
+compared to other test runs where the PPS result is less with only 2 flows.
+
+There are lost packets reported in most of the test runs. There is no observed
+correlation between the amount of flows and the amount of lost packets.
+The lost amount of packets normally differs a lot per test run.
+
+Detailed test results
+---------------------
+The scenario was run on LF POD1_ with:
+Apex
+OpenStack Mitaka
+OpenVirtualSwitch 2.5.90
+OpenDayLight Beryllium
+
+Rationale for decisions
+-----------------------
+Pass
+
+Conclusions and recommendations
+-------------------------------
+Tests were successfully executed and metrics collected.
+No SLA was verified. To be decided on in next release of OPNFV.
+
+
+
fuel
====
@@ -24,9 +256,8 @@ See Grafana_ for viewing test result metrics for each respective test case. It
is possible to chose which specific scenarios to look at, and then to zoom in
on the details of each run test scenario as well.
-All of the test case results below are based on 4 scenario test
-runs, each run on the Ericsson POD2_ or LF POD2_ between August 25 and 29 in
-2016.
+All of the test case results below are based on 4 scenario test runs, each run
+on the Ericsson POD2_ or LF POD2_ between August 25 and 29 in 2016.
TC002
-----
@@ -306,7 +537,7 @@ The IO read bandwidth actually refers to the storage throughput, which is
measured by fio and the greatest IO read bandwidth of the four runs is 183.65
MB/s. The IO read bandwidth of the three runs looks similar, with an average
between 62.9 and 64.3 MB/s, except one on Sep. 1, for its maximum storage
-throughput is only 159.1 MB/s. One of the runs has a minimum BW of 685 KM/s and
+throughput is only 159.1 MB/s. One of the runs has a minimum BW of 685 KB/s and
other has a maximum BW of 183.6 MB/s. The SLA of read bandwidth sets to be
400 MB/s, which is used as a reference, and it has not been defined by OPNFV.
@@ -509,3 +740,4 @@ Conclusions and recommendations
-------------------------------
Tests were successfully executed and metrics collected.
No SLA was verified. To be decided on in next release of OPNFV.
+