diff options
author | Xavier Simonart <xavier.simonart@intel.com> | 2020-03-24 00:31:13 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Xavier Simonart <xavier.simonart@intel.com> | 2020-05-29 23:40:28 +0200 |
commit | c61fccde40dc6bb4a6ecd21c9d6dc8969df33400 (patch) | |
tree | acdf0a31a6d1eea0e97f3ef6d1b70f4b97bc0dc0 /.gitreview | |
parent | 4359ac786cc49d0ce20f745def415d46fbba177d (diff) |
Added support for secondary process & virtual devices
A virtual device can be created adding the following option on the eal field within
the eal options section:
--vdev=net_ring0
This will cause a new (virtual) dpdk port to be created.
Such a device can then be used in a primary process as other DPDK devices i.e.
a [port x] section must be defined in the configuration file
For a secondary process, there is no need to add --vdev, but, of course
--proc-type=secondary (or --proc-type=auto) must be set within the eal field.
There are two ways to use such a virtual device in a secondary process
1) Using the DPDK port number. Note however that the DPDK port number of virtual devices
in the secondary process might not start from 0 and might hence have to be guessed
e.g. if using 2 virtual devices in primary process (--vdev=net_ring0 --vdev=net_ring1)
the port_id will be 0 and 1 in primary process and 2 & 3 in secondary process.
2) Using the port name, as defined in --vdev in the primary process. In this way,
no [port] section must be defined, and the virtual port names are directly used within
the "rx port" and "tx port" configuration e.g.:
rx port=net_ring0
tx port=net_ring1
Limitations
===========
There seems to be a PROX leak causing DPDK port id to increase when restarting the
secondary process (causing the secondary process configuration through port id more difficult).
As the primary process configures the port (including the number of rx and tx queues)
based on its config file, the secondary process can't setup its own queues.
Simple configurations (such as using gen or lat in primary, and swap in secondary) work as PROX
allocates a RX queue even in gen mode and a TX queue even in lat mode. Better configuration/support
for secondary process should be designed.
The use of dpdk port names is only supported by PROX within "rx port" and "tx port". It is not
supported by other configuration fields such as "tx ports from routing table".
The use of dpdk port names in "rx port" and "tx port" is limited to only 1 port.
Change-Id: Iaa606625da471403713a21df79d3ded4bb91b91e
Signed-off-by: Xavier Simonart <xavier.simonart@intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to '.gitreview')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions