Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|
Using 'installer' to describe the tool that will deploy the foundations
of a particular XCI scenario is more appropriate than NFVI which
normally describes both the physical and virtual resources needed by
an NFV deployment.
Change-Id: Ib8b1aac58673bf705ce2ff053574fd10cb390d71
Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <mchandras@suse.de>
|
|
It was committed by accident in c74cfd33fc3c ("xci: OSA: Move all the
OSA specific playbooks to the NFVI directory") so drop it.
Change-Id: I5de91f0aad750a9cb723a46baa63e75beb3180de
Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <mchandras@suse.de>
|
|
we maybe introduce other NFVI in the future in XCI.
it is necessary to put the nfvi files to corresponding directory xci/nfvi/$NFVI/files,
otherwise the files directory will be confused.
Change-Id: Iea98167ff0bc8d338a94fe1c064ac0ab396c53d3
Signed-off-by: wutianwei <wutianwei1@huawei.com>
|
|
Move all the playbooks that only make sense for OpenStack-Ansible
deployments to the NFVI/OSA directory where they belong. This further
disassociates XCI from OSA.
Change-Id: Iab8b6dc81d9025a1d85608a98fb1eee0f1c6a69f
Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <mchandras@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Fatih Degirmenci <fdegir@gmail.com>
|