summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/docs/scenario-lifecycle/specific-scenarios.rst
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorulik <ulik@localhost.localdomain>2017-02-10 16:31:06 +0100
committerulik <ulrich.kleber@huawei.com>2017-03-14 09:33:24 +0100
commit79668fcf4509d0f4538828d726e807b83ff4f2bc (patch)
treea847a52a27eecb3cef8155ace84e600936d0d038 /docs/scenario-lifecycle/specific-scenarios.rst
parenta80ff748730bd3ee8c42b8f00f5c01ba8e41dd92 (diff)
Scenario Lifecycle Document - First version with content
1.step(patchset 1&2): provide index.rst and overview 2.step(patchset 3): provide sceleton 3.step(patchset 4): fix comments and provide first content patchset 5: fix comments in 8 files, one file deleted. patchset 6: fix more comments patchset 7: fix more comments adding some editors notes Jira OCTO-162 Change-Id: I8928953da29aef2bddeb42510fb5983eee9ea30f Signed-off-by: ulik <ulrich.kleber@huawei.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'docs/scenario-lifecycle/specific-scenarios.rst')
-rw-r--r--docs/scenario-lifecycle/specific-scenarios.rst34
1 files changed, 34 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/docs/scenario-lifecycle/specific-scenarios.rst b/docs/scenario-lifecycle/specific-scenarios.rst
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..5f426e7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/docs/scenario-lifecycle/specific-scenarios.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
+.. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
+.. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
+.. (c) 2017 OPNFV Ulrich Kleber (Huawei)
+
+
+Specific Scenarios
+------------------
+
+Specific scenarios are used for OPNFV development and help to isolate a path of development.
+
+* Specific scenarios typically focus on a feature or topic.
+* Specific scenarios allow to advance in development for their main feature without
+ de-stabilizing other features.
+* Specific scenarios provide additional flexibility in their handling to allow the
+ development be agile.
+* Specific scenarios can use new version of their main upstream component or even
+ apply midstream patches during OPNFV deployment, i.e. the deployable artifact
+ is created via cross community CI or even only in OPNFV and not upstream.
+* Specific scenarios should have a limited life time. After a few releases, the feature
+ development should have matured and the feature made available different configurations
+ if possible. Typically the scenario then should be merged with other scenarios, best
+ with generic scenarios.
+* Normally specific scenarios will be released within the major OPNFV releases. But
+ they don't need to fulfill maturity requirements (stable upstream versions and repos,
+ stability testing), and can deviate in the used upstream versions.
+* In exceptional cases we might release a specific scenario independently, in case there
+ is a need. Thus specific scenarios provide a way to a more DevOps-like process.
+* Specific scenarios will likely have a shorter support period after release as they are of
+ interest to a smaller user community vs generic scenarios.
+* They will be granted less CI resources than generic scenarios, e.g. for periodic
+ CI jobs.
+* We may need to prioritize resources post-release for maintenance / regression testing.
+
+