summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/docs/requirements/summary.rst
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorGeorg Kunz <georg.kunz@ericsson.com>2016-08-11 10:04:39 +0200
committerGeorg Kunz <georg.kunz@ericsson.com>2016-09-16 09:24:19 +0000
commit39d5de2b814b2ec038da973b82ee62f11a266b96 (patch)
tree8eb8ac2038d8db8d468c6389529b90e3076eab52 /docs/requirements/summary.rst
parentbe8fbafa73dd6f22fa6fadac1adb82ff47072516 (diff)
Global review of the NetReady requirements documentcolorado.1.0
This patchset enables a global review of the entire NetReady requirements document. Changes to the document shall be pushed as new patches to this patchset. Change-Id: I7cc9290c9260aad5b687253b02d60efbc8a64bb2 Signed-off-by: Georg Kunz <georg.kunz@ericsson.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'docs/requirements/summary.rst')
-rw-r--r--docs/requirements/summary.rst46
1 files changed, 46 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/docs/requirements/summary.rst b/docs/requirements/summary.rst
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..2761a48
--- /dev/null
+++ b/docs/requirements/summary.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
+.. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
+.. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
+
+Summary and Conclusion
+======================
+
+This document presented the results of the OPNFV NetReady (Network Readiness)
+project ([NETREADY]_). It described a selection of NFV-related networking use
+cases and their corresponding networking requirements. Moreover, for every use
+case, it describes an associated gap analysis which analyses the aforementioned
+networking requirements with respect to the current OpenStack networking
+architecture.
+
+The contents of the current document are the selected use cases and their
+derived requirements and identified gaps for OPNFV C release.
+
+OPNFV NetReady is open to take any further use cases under analysis in later
+OPNFV releases. The project backlog ([NETREADY-JIRA]_) lists the use cases and
+topics planned to be developed in future releases of OPNFV.
+
+Based on the gap analyses, we draw the following conclusions:
+
+* Besides current requirements and gaps identified in support of NFV networking,
+ more and more new NFV networking services are to be innovated in the near future.
+ Those innovations will bring additional requirements, and more significant gaps
+ will be expected. On the other hand, NFV networking business requires it
+ to be made easy to innovate, quick to develop, and agile to deploy and operate.
+ Therefore, a model-driven, extensible framework is expected to support NFV
+ networking on-demand in order to accelerate time-to-market and achieve business
+ agility for innovations in NFV networking business.
+
+* Neutron networks are implicitly, because of their reliance on subnets, L2
+ domains. L2 network overlays are the only way to implement Neutron networks
+ because of their semantics. However, L2 networks are inefficient ways to
+ implement cloud networking, and while this is not necessarily a problem for
+ enterprise use cases with moderate traffic it can add expense to the
+ infrastructure of NFV cases where networking is heavily used and efficient use
+ of capacity is key.
+
+* In NFV environment it should be possible to execute network administrator tasks
+ without OpenStack administrator rights.
+
+* In a multi-site setup it should be possible to manage the connection between
+ the sites in a programmable way.
+
+The latest version of this document can be found at [SELF]_.