Moving requirements documentation for Danube

Moving the requirements documentation in order to comply to the
new structure for Danube.

Change-Id: Ifbf87b49ce2308d082510ca761bb7bc6479fce58
Signed-off-by: Georg Kunz <georg.kunz@ericsson.com>

1 files changed, 0 insertions, 78 deletions

diff --git a/docs/requirements/retired_use_cases/programmable_provisioning.rst b/docs/requirements/retired_use_cases/programmable_provisioning.rst
deleted file mode 100644
index 7cb2e00..0000000
--- a/docs/requirements/retired_use_cases/programmable_provisioning.rst
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,78 +0,0 @@
-.. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
-.. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
-
-Programmable Provisioning of Provider Networks
-----------------------------------------------
-Description
-~~~~~~~~~~~
-
-In a NFV environment the VNFMs (Virtual Network Function Manager) are consumers
-of the OpenStack IaaS API. They are often deployed without administrative rights
-on top of the NFVI platform. Furthermore, in the telco domain provider networks
-are often used. However, when a provider network is created administrative
-rights are needed what in the case of a VNFM without administrative rights
-requires additional manual configuration work.  It shall be possible to
-configure provider networks without administrative rights.  It should be
-possible to assign the capability to create provider networks to any roles.
-
-The following figure (:numref:`api-users`) shows the possible users of an
-OpenStack API and the relation of OpenStack and ETSI NFV components. Boxes with
-solid line are the ETSI NFV components while the boxes with broken line are the
-OpenStack components.
-
-.. figure:: images/api-users.png
-    :name:  api-users
-    :width: 50%
-
-
-Requirements
-~~~~~~~~~~~~
-   - Authorize the possibility of provider network creation based on policy
-   - There should be a new entry in :code:`policy.json` which controls the
-     provider network creation
-   - Default policy of this new entry should be :code:`rule:admin_or_owner`.
-   - This policy should be respected by the Neutron API
-
-Northbound API / Workflow
-+++++++++++++++++++++++++
-   - No changes in the API
-
-Data model objects
-++++++++++++++++++
-   - No changes in the data model
-
-
-Current implementation
-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-Only admin users can manage provider networks [OS-NETWORKING-GUIDE-ML2]_.
-
-
-Potential implementation
-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-   - Policy engine shall be able to handle a new provider network creation and
-     modification related policy.
-   - When a provider network is created or modified neutron should check the
-     authority with the policy engine instead of requesting administrative
-     rights.
-
-
-Solution in upstream community
-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-
-A bug report has been submitted to the upstream OpenStack community to highlight
-this gap:
-https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1630880
-
-This bug report revealed that this use case has already been addressed in the
-upstream community. Specifically, it is possible to specify the roles (e.g.,
-admin, regular user) in the Neutron policy.json file which are able to create
-and update provider networks.
-
-However, the OpenStack user guide wrongly stated that **only** administrators
-can create and update provider type networks. Hence, a correction has been
-submitted to the OpenStack documentation repository, clarifying the possibility
-to change this behavior based on policies:
-https://review.openstack.org/#/c/390359/
-
-In conclusion, this use case has been retired as the corresponding gaps have been
-closed in the upstream community.