| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
JIRA: DOVETAIL-634
The OVP web port needs to read from the test results if the strict API
response validation exemption was used or not and show it
correspondingly.
Detailed description:
As discussed on the Dovetail call on 2018-04-11, the web portal should
show if API response validation was enabled or disabled. The information
if API response validation was enabled or disabled is to be determined
based on the dovetail.log file. If API response validation was
disabled,** the log file contains the line "Strict API response
validation DISABLED.". Upon uploading a result tar-package, the web
portal should extract this information from the log file, store it in
the database, and display it as follows:
This indication shall be displayed along with the test summary on the
Test Run Results page as either:
"API response validation enabled" or
"API response validation disabled"
For clarification: API response validation is enabled by default. API
response validation is disabled only if the --no-api-validation command
line option is given.
Change-Id: Ifacb1eb2127cc8dc6364c98dead1217aeedfd359
Signed-off-by: chenjiankun <chenjiankun1@huawei.com>
|
|
We don't allow SUT version to be None when submitting test.
So we also not allow user to change it to Nonw after submitting.
In this patch, I also make the result table self-adaption.
Change-Id: I5c391592dcbdbd9eb8697e44d7bb5dda41431bd6
Signed-off-by: chenjiankun <chenjiankun1@huawei.com>
|
|
JIRA: DOVETAIL-572
We currently have a label column in the OVP test result view. This
allows users to attach a custom label field to their results. It is at
the users discretion to fill out this field.
We need a separate SUT version column to track the product version
number being submitted for official review. The field can be left blank
when users upload and share results in a private manner. However, the
OVP portal must check that this new 'SUT version' field is populated
before results are officially submitted for review. An error message
prompting the user to fill out this field if it is blank must be
implemented when users submit results for review.
Change-Id: I1ca915423a56e8173a3a13f1b84b066cf91d9291
Signed-off-by: chenjiankun <chenjiankun1@huawei.com>
|
|
The reason is there are some conflict with jquery.js and ng-model.
So ng-model not work.
Change-Id: I01ccd0e297d1a89aff8f78d7fb0a63a0e2114f63
Signed-off-by: grakiss <grakiss.wanglei@huawei.com>
|
|
JIRA: DOVETAIL-562
According to the CVP workflow, once a result has been submitted to review,
the admin will send email to all reviewers to get the comment (+1 / -1).
Enable admin to approve/not approve the result after he gets the feedback from all reviewers.
Otherwise, the result will always be in 'review' status.
Change-Id: Ic3ace3c7284c70e9a8186d03e6cd88c91ecc76f9
Signed-off-by: grakiss <grakiss.wanglei@huawei.com>
|
|
JIRA: DOVETAIL-560
Can't submit the same results to review from different users.
Change-Id: I4a3dcc2dc8a817653ac9da6f93722659e04c89a1
Signed-off-by: grakiss <grakiss.wanglei@huawei.com>
|
|
'Test ID'
JIRA: DOVETAIL-554
It allows different users to upload the same results now.
So the 'Test ID' is not unique in this situation.
Use '_id' as the primary key which can uniquely identify one data.
Change-Id: I852ee116f36a6a86e9b4350183e39ee00f8b99de
Signed-off-by: grakiss <grakiss.wanglei@huawei.com>
|
|
JIRA: DOVETAIL-532
1. original filename
2. user editable label
Change-Id: I1566cecb3d8ceacc14167bb2fb7fa41508f293be
Signed-off-by: grakiss <grakiss.wanglei@huawei.com>
|
|
JIRA: DOVETAIL-529
It may be easier to get other people's email than his user id
Change-Id: Ia5f9aa72d3c79bd3f5e69dad98b3f188cdaafc3d
Signed-off-by: grakiss <grakiss.wanglei@huawei.com>
|
|
JIRA: DOVETAIL-512
add api&web services for cvp
Change-Id: I9ef9525e980fe61dc3108035ef9a3ff8783b2697
Signed-off-by: grakiss <grakiss.wanglei@huawei.com>
|
chenjiankun
grakiss