diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'docs/testing/user/ovpaddendum')
| -rw-r--r-- | docs/testing/user/ovpaddendum/exemption-strict-API-validation.rst | 6 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | docs/testing/user/ovpaddendum/index.rst | 32 |
2 files changed, 19 insertions, 19 deletions
diff --git a/docs/testing/user/ovpaddendum/exemption-strict-API-validation.rst b/docs/testing/user/ovpaddendum/exemption-strict-API-validation.rst index 7e9cdaa0..27173ed9 100644 --- a/docs/testing/user/ovpaddendum/exemption-strict-API-validation.rst +++ b/docs/testing/user/ovpaddendum/exemption-strict-API-validation.rst @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ Consequently, such cloud implementations do not pass Tempest tests which validate API responses despite actually implementing and providing the tested functionality. -This document describes an exemption process for use within the OPNFV Verified +This document describes an exemption process for use within the OPNFV Verification Program which i) allows vendors to pass Tempest tests if the tested functionality is @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ is actually available. As a result, a Tempest test failing due to extended API responses does not provide information about whether the tested functionality is available or not. -The OPNFV Verified Program has inherited the policy to strictly validate API +The OPNFV Verification Program has inherited the policy to strictly validate API responses from OpenStack by including a selection of Tempest tests in its compliance test suite. However, it was never discussed if OVP should adopt this policy as well. It turns out that this policy causes challenges for vendors of @@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ responses is as follows: not. #. The exemption will be made available to participants of OVP as part of a - service release of OVP 2018.01 and 2018.09. + service release of OVP 2018.01, 2018.09 and 2019.12. #. The C&C committee will monitor the situation around exemptions and may decide changes to the above process at any time, including the possibility diff --git a/docs/testing/user/ovpaddendum/index.rst b/docs/testing/user/ovpaddendum/index.rst index 7072d3f1..556b1b49 100644 --- a/docs/testing/user/ovpaddendum/index.rst +++ b/docs/testing/user/ovpaddendum/index.rst @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ .. (c) Intel and others ======================================= -Guidelines Addendum for 2018.09 release +Guidelines Addendum for 2019.12 release ======================================= .. toctree:: @@ -15,10 +15,10 @@ Introduction ============ This addendum provides a high-level description of the testing scope and -pass/fail criteria used in the OPNFV Verified Program (OVP) for the 2018.09 +pass/fail criteria used in the OPNFV Verification Program (OVP) for the 2019.12 release. This information is intended as an overview for OVP testers and for the Dovetail Project to help guide test-tool and test-case development for the -OVP 2018.09 release. The Dovetail project is responsible for documenting +OVP 2019.12 release. The Dovetail project is responsible for documenting test-case specifications as well as implementing the OVP tool-chain through collaboration with the OPNFV testing community. OVP testing focuses on establishing the ability of the System Under Test (SUT) to perform NFVI and VIM @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ Meaning of Compliance OPNFV Compliance indicates adherence of an NFV platform to behaviors defined through specific platform capabilities, allowing to prepare, instantiate, -operate and remove VNFs running on the NFVI. OVP 2018.09 compliance evaluates +operate and remove VNFs running on the NFVI. OVP 2019.12 compliance evaluates the ability of a platform to support Service Provider network capabilities and workloads that are supported in the OPNFV platform as of this release. Compliance test cases are designated as compulsory or optional based on the @@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ test scope. Analysis of Scope ----------------- -In order to define the scope of the 2018.09 release of the compliance and +In order to define the scope of the 2019.12 release of the compliance and verification program, this section analyzes NFV-focused platform capabilities with respect to the high-level objectives and the general approach outlined in the previous section. The analysis determines which capabilities are suitable @@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ including: suspend/resume, reboot, migrate) - simple virtual machine resource scheduling on multiple nodes -OPNFV mainly supports OpenStack as the VIM up to the 2018.09 release. The VNFs +OPNFV mainly supports OpenStack as the VIM up to the 2019.12 release. The VNFs used in the OVP program, and features in scope for the program which are considered to be basic to all VNFs, require commercial OpenStack distributions to support a common basic level of cloud capabilities, and to be compliant to a @@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ feature requirements expand beyond common OpenStack (or other VIM) requirements. OPNFV OVP will incorporate test cases to verify compliance in these areas as they become mature. Because these extensions may impose new API demands, maturity and industry adoption is a prerequisite for making them a -mandatory requirement for OPNFV compliance. At the time of the 2018.09 release, +mandatory requirement for OPNFV compliance. At the time of the 2019.12 release, we have promoted tests of the OpenStack IPv6 API from optional to mandatory while keeping BGPVPN as optional test area. Passing optional tests will not be required to pass OPNFV compliance verification. @@ -207,7 +207,7 @@ BGPVPNs are relevant due to the wide adoption of MPLS/BGP based VPNs in wide area networks, which makes it necessary for data centers hosting VNFs to be able to seamlessly interconnect with such networks. SFC is also an important NFV requirement, however its implementation has not yet been accepted or -adopted in the upstream at the time of the 2018.09 release. +adopted in the upstream at the time of the 2019.12 release. 3. High availability @@ -233,7 +233,7 @@ Resiliency testing involves stressing the SUT and verifying its ability to absorb stress conditions and still provide an acceptable level of service. Resiliency is an important requirement for end-users. -The 2018.09 release of OVP includes a load test which spins up a number of VMs +The 2019.12 release of OVP includes a load test which spins up a number of VMs pairs in parallel to assert that the system under test can process the workload spike in a stable and deterministic fashion. @@ -248,12 +248,12 @@ capabilities expected of an end-user deployment. It is an area that we should address in the near future, to define a common set of requirements and develop test cases for verifying those requirements. -The 2018.09 release includes new test cases which verify that the role-based +The 2019.12 release includes new test cases which verify that the role-based access control (RBAC) functionality of the VIM is behaving as expected. Another common requirement is security vulnerability scanning. While the OPNFV security project integrated tools for security vulnerability scanning, this has -not been fully analyzed or exercised in 2018.09 release. This area needs +not been fully analyzed or exercised in 2019.12 release. This area needs further work to identify the required level of security for the purpose of OPNFV in order to be integrated into the OVP. End-user inputs on specific requirements in security is needed. @@ -266,7 +266,7 @@ essential information and control mechanisms. These subsystems include telemetry, fault management (e.g. alarms), performance management, audits, and control mechanisms such as security and configuration policies. -The current 2018.09 release implements some enabling capabilities in NFVI/VIM +The current 2019.12 release implements some enabling capabilities in NFVI/VIM such as telemetry, policy, and fault management. However, the specification of expected system components, behavior and the test cases to verify them have not yet been adequately developed. We will therefore not be testing this area at @@ -285,7 +285,7 @@ compliance because it validates design patterns and support for the types of NFVI features that users care about. There are a lot of projects in OPNFV developing use cases and sample VNFs. The -2018.09 release of OVP features two such use-case tests, spawning and verifying +2019.12 release of OVP features two such use-case tests, spawning and verifying a vIMS and a vEPC, correspondingly. 8. Additional capabilities @@ -307,10 +307,10 @@ OVP. -Scope of the 2018.09 release of the OVP +Scope of the 2019.12 release of the OVP --------------------------------------- -Summarizing the results of the analysis above, the scope of the 2018.09 release +Summarizing the results of the analysis above, the scope of the 2019.12 release of OVP is as follows: - Mandatory test scope: @@ -369,7 +369,7 @@ Scope considerations for future OVP releases -------------------------------------------- Based on the previous analysis, the following items are outside the scope of -the 2018.09 release of OVP but are being considered for inclusion in future +the 2019.12 release of OVP but are being considered for inclusion in future releases: - service assurance |