summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/docs/testing/user/cvpaddendum
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorGeorg Kunz <georg.kunz@ericsson.com>2017-10-06 16:07:17 +0200
committerGeorg Kunz <georg.kunz@ericsson.com>2017-10-23 11:44:34 +0000
commit413355acbcb70074d6861754ad8eb3de0423c417 (patch)
tree43031f0fddb6ab086009299f6de269ab2299bb59 /docs/testing/user/cvpaddendum
parenta5c7a5358ab160f7518798dc977bf85fed32ddb9 (diff)
Fixing references and layout in the docs
This patchset introduces labels for documentation-internal references and replaces footnote-style citations with inline hyperlinks. Additional minor changes for a nicer rendering of bullet lists. JIRA: DOVETAIL-521 Change-Id: Ic847fc05d546d673dadc7b8efee86fcb688133f5 Signed-off-by: Georg Kunz <georg.kunz@ericsson.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'docs/testing/user/cvpaddendum')
-rw-r--r--docs/testing/user/cvpaddendum/index.rst93
1 files changed, 50 insertions, 43 deletions
diff --git a/docs/testing/user/cvpaddendum/index.rst b/docs/testing/user/cvpaddendum/index.rst
index 69c10b95..cd8a296a 100644
--- a/docs/testing/user/cvpaddendum/index.rst
+++ b/docs/testing/user/cvpaddendum/index.rst
@@ -3,6 +3,8 @@
.. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
.. (c) Intel and others
+.. _dovetail-cvp_addendum:
+
====================================================================
Compliance Verification Program - Guidelines Addendum for Danube
====================================================================
@@ -49,25 +51,31 @@ SUT Assumptions
Assumptions about the System Under Test (SUT) include ...
- - The minimal specification of physical infrastructure, including controller
- nodes, compute nodes and networks, is defined by the Pharos specification
- [2].
- - The SUT is fully deployed and operational, i.e. SUT deployment tools are
- out of scope of testing.
+- The minimal specification of physical infrastructure, including controller
+ nodes, compute nodes and networks, is defined by the `Pharos specification`_.
+
+- The SUT is fully deployed and operational, i.e. SUT deployment tools are
+ out of scope of testing.
Scope of Testing
================
-The OPNFV CVP Guidelines [1], as approved by the Board of Directors, outlines
+The `OPNFV CVP Guidelines`_, as approved by the Board of Directors, outlines
the key objectives of the CVP as follows:
- - Help build the market for
- - OPNFV based infrastructure
- - applications designed to run on that infrastructure
- - Reduce adoption risks for end-users
- - Decrease testing costs by verifying hardware and software platform
- interfaces and components
- - Enhance interoperability
+
+- Help build the market for
+
+ - OPNFV based infrastructure
+
+ - applications designed to run on that infrastructure
+
+- Reduce adoption risks for end-users
+
+- Decrease testing costs by verifying hardware and software platform
+ interfaces and components
+
+- Enhance interoperability
The guidelines further directs the scope to be constrained to "features,
capabilities, components, and interfaces included in an OPNFV release that are
@@ -150,18 +158,19 @@ A basic VNF can be thought of as a single virtual machine that is networked
and can perform the simplest network functions, for example, a simple forwarding
gateway, or a set of such virtual machines connected only by simple virtual network
services. Running such basic VNF leads to a set of common requirements, including:
- - image management (Refstack testing Glance API)
- - identity management (Refstack testing Keystone Identity API)
- - virtual compute (Refstack testing Nova Compute API)
- - virtual storage (Refstack testing Cinder API)
- - virtual networks (Refstack testing Neutron Network API)
- - forwarding packets through virtual networks in data path
- - filtering packets based on security rules and port security in data path
- - dynamic network runtime operations through the life of a VNF (e.g. attach/detach,
- enable/disable, read stats)
- - correct behavior after common virtual machine life cycles events (e.g.
- suspend/resume, reboot, migrate)
- - simple virtual machine resource scheduling on multiple nodes
+
+- image management (Refstack testing Glance API)
+- identity management (Refstack testing Keystone Identity API)
+- virtual compute (Refstack testing Nova Compute API)
+- virtual storage (Refstack testing Cinder API)
+- virtual networks (Refstack testing Neutron Network API)
+- forwarding packets through virtual networks in data path
+- filtering packets based on security rules and port security in data path
+- dynamic network runtime operations through the life of a VNF (e.g. attach/detach,
+ enable/disable, read stats)
+- correct behavior after common virtual machine life cycles events (e.g.
+ suspend/resume, reboot, migrate)
+- simple virtual machine resource scheduling on multiple nodes
OPNFV mainly supports OpenStack as the VIM up to the Danube release. The
VNFs used in the CVP program, and features in scope for the program which are
@@ -373,19 +382,19 @@ Based on the previous analysis, the following items are outside the scope of
the Danube release of the CV but are being considered for inclusion in future
releases:
- - service assurance
- - use case testing
- - platform in-place upgrade
- - API backward compatibility / micro-versioning
- - workload migration
- - multi-site federation
- - service function chaining
- - platform operational insights, e.g. telemetry, logging
- - efficiency, e.g. hardware and energy footprint of the platform
- - interoperability with workload automation platforms e.g. ONAP
- - resilience
- - security and vulnerability scanning
- - performance measurements
+- service assurance
+- use case testing
+- platform in-place upgrade
+- API backward compatibility / micro-versioning
+- workload migration
+- multi-site federation
+- service function chaining
+- platform operational insights, e.g. telemetry, logging
+- efficiency, e.g. hardware and energy footprint of the platform
+- interoperability with workload automation platforms e.g. ONAP
+- resilience
+- security and vulnerability scanning
+- performance measurements
Criteria for Awarding Compliance
@@ -407,9 +416,7 @@ documented and accepted by the reviewers.
Applicants who choose to run the optional test cases can include the results
of the optional test cases to highlight the additional compliance.
-References
-==========
-
-[1] The OPNFV CVP Guidelines v.16 [Editor's note: link to be provided.]
-[2] Pharos specification xxx [Editor's note: link to be provided.]
+.. References
+.. _`OPNFV CVP Guidelines`: https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/dovetail/CVP+document
+.. _`Pharos specification`: https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/pharos/Pharos+Specification