1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
|
.. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
.. License.
.. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
.. (c) OPNFV, 2016-2017 Intel Corporation.
===================================
Network Services Benchmarking (NSB)
===================================
.. _Yardstick: https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/yardstick
.. _`ETSI GS NFV-TST001`: http://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_gs/NFV-TST/001_099/001/01.01.01_60/gs_nfv-tst001v010101p.pdf
Abstract
--------
This chapter provides an overview of the NSB, a contribution to OPNFV
Yardstick_ from Intel.
Overview
--------
The goal of NSB is to Extend Yardstick to perform real world VNFs and NFVi
Characterization and benchmarking with repeatable and deterministic methods.
The Network Service Benchmarking (NSB) extends the yardstick framework to do
VNF characterization and benchmarking in three different execution
environments - bare metal i.e. native Linux environment, standalone virtual
environment and managed virtualized environment (e.g. Open stack etc.).
It also brings in the capability to interact with external traffic generators
both hardware & software based for triggering and validating the traffic
according to user defined profiles.
NSB extension includes:
* Generic data models of Network Services, based on ETSI spec
`ETSI GS NFV-TST 001`_
* Standalone :term:`context` for VNF testing like SRIOV, OVS, OVS-DPDK, etc
* Generic VNF configuration models and metrics implemented with Python
classes
* Traffic generator features and traffic profiles
* L1-L3 stateless traffic profiles
* L4-L7 state-full traffic profiles
* Tunneling protocol/network overlay support
* Test case samples
* Ping
* Trex
* vPE, vCGNAT, vFirewall etc - ipv4 throughput, latency etc
* Traffic generators i.e. Trex, ab/nginx, ixia, iperf, etc
* KPIs for a given use case:
* System agent support for collecting NFVi KPI. This includes:
* CPU statistic
* Memory BW
* OVS-DPDK Stats
* Network KPIs e.g. inpackets, outpackets, thoughput, latency
* VNF KPIs e.g. packet_in, packet_drop, packet_fwd
Architecture
============
The Network Service (NS) defines a set of Virtual Network Functions (VNF)
connected together using NFV infrastructure.
The Yardstick NSB extension can support multiple VNFs created by different
vendors including traffic generators. Every VNF being tested has its
own data model. The Network service defines a VNF modelling on base of
performed network functionality. The part of the data model is a set of the
configuration parameters, number of connection points used and flavor including
core and memory amount.
ETSI defines a Network Service as a set of configurable VNFs working in some
NFV Infrastructure connecting each other using Virtual Links available through
Connection Points. The ETSI MANO specification defines a set of management
entities called Network Service Descriptors (NSD) and VNF Descriptors (VNFD)
that define real Network Service. The picture below makes an example how the
real Network Operator use-case can map into ETSI Network service definition.
Network Service framework performs the necessary test steps. It may involve:
* Interacting with traffic generator and providing the inputs on traffic
type / packet structure to generate the required traffic as per the
test case. Traffic profiles will be used for this.
* Executing the commands required for the test procedure and analyses the
command output for confirming whether the command got executed correctly
or not e.g. as per the test case, run the traffic for the given
time period and wait for the necessary time delay.
* Verify the test result.
* Validate the traffic flow from SUT.
* Fetch the data from SUT and verify the value as per the test case.
* Upload the logs from SUT onto the Test Harness server
* Retrieve the KPI's provided by particular VNF
Components of Network Service
-----------------------------
* *Models for Network Service benchmarking*: The Network Service benchmarking
requires the proper modelling approach. The NSB provides models using Python
files and defining of NSDs and VNFDs.
The benchmark control application being a part of OPNFV yardstick can call
that python models to instantiate and configure the VNFs. Depending on
infrastructure type (bare-metal or fully virtualized) that calls could be
made directly or using MANO system.
* *Traffic generators in NSB*: Any benchmark application requires a set of
traffic generator and traffic profiles defining the method in which traffic
is generated.
The Network Service benchmarking model extends the Network Service
definition with a set of Traffic Generators (TG) that are treated
same way as other VNFs being a part of benchmarked network service.
Same as other VNFs the traffic generator are instantiated and terminated.
Every traffic generator has own configuration defined as a traffic profile
and a set of KPIs supported. The python models for TG is extended by
specific calls to listen and generate traffic.
* *The stateless TREX traffic generator*: The main traffic generator used as
Network Service stimulus is open source TREX tool.
The TREX tool can generate any kind of stateless traffic.
.. code-block:: console
+--------+ +-------+ +--------+
| | | | | |
| Trex | ---> | VNF | ---> | Trex |
| | | | | |
+--------+ +-------+ +--------+
Supported testcases scenarios:
* Correlated UDP traffic using TREX traffic generator and replay VNF.
* using different IMIX configuration like pure voice, pure video traffic etc
* using different number IP flows e.g. 1, 1K, 16K, 64K, 256K, 1M flows
* Using different number of rules configured e.g. 1, 1K, 10K rules
For UDP correlated traffic following Key Performance Indicators are collected
for every combination of test case parameters:
* RFC2544 throughput for various loss rate defined (1% is a default)
Graphical Overview
==================
NSB Testing with Yardstick framework facilitate performance testing of various
VNFs provided.
.. code-block:: console
+-----------+
| | +-------------+
| vPE | -->| TGen Port 0 |
| TestCase | | +-------------+
| | |
+-----------+ +---------------+ +-------+ |
| | ---> | VNF | <--->
+-----------+ | Yardstick | +-------+ |
| Test Case | --> | NSB Testing | |
+-----------+ | | |
| | | |
| +---------------+ |
+-----------+ | +-------------+
| Traffic | -->| TGen Port 1 |
| patterns | +-------------+
+-----------+
Figure 1: Network Service - 2 server configuration
VNFs supported for chracterization:
-----------------------------------
1. CGNAPT - Carrier Grade Network Address and port Translation
2. vFW - Virtual Firewall
3. vACL - Access Control List
4. Prox - Packet pROcessing eXecution engine:
* VNF can act as Drop, Basic Forwarding (no touch),
L2 Forwarding (change MAC), GRE encap/decap, Load balance based on
packet fields, Symmetric load balancing
* QinQ encap/decap IPv4/IPv6, ARP, QoS, Routing, Unmpls, Policing, ACL
5. UDP_Replay
|
