diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'docs/testing/user/userguide/opnfv_yardstick_tc025.rst')
| -rw-r--r-- | docs/testing/user/userguide/opnfv_yardstick_tc025.rst | 123 |
1 files changed, 123 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/docs/testing/user/userguide/opnfv_yardstick_tc025.rst b/docs/testing/user/userguide/opnfv_yardstick_tc025.rst new file mode 100644 index 000000000..0e2e9a5f8 --- /dev/null +++ b/docs/testing/user/userguide/opnfv_yardstick_tc025.rst @@ -0,0 +1,123 @@ +.. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International +.. License. +.. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 +.. (c) OPNFV, Huawei Technologies Co.,Ltd and others. + +************************************* +Yardstick Test Case Description TC025 +************************************* + ++-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ +|OpenStack Controller Node abnormally shutdown High Availability | +| | ++--------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+ +|test case id | OPNFV_YARDSTICK_TC025_HA: OpenStack Controller Node | +| | abnormally shutdown | +| | | ++--------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+ +|test purpose | This test case will verify the high availability of | +| | controller node. When one of the controller node abnormally | +| | shutdown, the service provided by it should be OK. | +| | | ++--------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+ +|test method | This test case shutdowns a specified controller node with | +| | some fault injection tools, then checks whether all services | +| | provided by the controller node are OK with some monitor | +| | tools. | +| | | ++--------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+ +|attackers | In this test case, an attacker called "host-shutdown" is | +| | needed. This attacker includes two parameters: | +| | 1) fault_type: which is used for finding the attacker's | +| | scripts. It should be always set to "host-shutdown" in | +| | this test case. | +| | 2) host: the name of a controller node being attacked. | +| | | +| | e.g. | +| | -fault_type: "host-shutdown" | +| | -host: node1 | +| | | ++--------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+ +|monitors | In this test case, one kind of monitor are needed: | +| | 1. the "openstack-cmd" monitor constantly request a specific | +| | Openstack command, which needs two parameters | +| | 1) monitor_type: which is used for finding the monitor class | +| | and related scritps. It should be always set to | +| | "openstack-cmd" for this monitor. | +| | 2) command_name: which is the command name used for request | +| | | +| | There are four instance of the "openstack-cmd" monitor: | +| | monitor1: | +| | -monitor_type: "openstack-cmd" | +| | -api_name: "nova image-list" | +| | monitor2: | +| | -monitor_type: "openstack-cmd" | +| | -api_name: "neutron router-list" | +| | monitor3: | +| | -monitor_type: "openstack-cmd" | +| | -api_name: "heat stack-list" | +| | monitor4: | +| | -monitor_type: "openstack-cmd" | +| | -api_name: "cinder list" | +| | | ++--------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+ +|metrics | In this test case, there is one metric: | +| | 1)service_outage_time: which indicates the maximum outage | +| | time (seconds) of the specified Openstack command request. | +| | | ++--------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+ +|test tool | Developed by the project. Please see folder: | +| | "yardstick/benchmark/scenarios/availability/ha_tools" | +| | | ++--------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+ +|references | ETSI NFV REL001 | +| | | ++--------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+ +|configuration | This test case needs two configuration files: | +| | 1) test case file: opnfv_yardstick_tc019.yaml | +| | -Attackers: see above "attackers" discription | +| | -waiting_time: which is the time (seconds) from the process | +| | being killed to stoping monitors the monitors | +| | -Monitors: see above "monitors" discription | +| | -SLA: see above "metrics" discription | +| | | +| | 2)POD file: pod.yaml | +| | The POD configuration should record on pod.yaml first. | +| | the "host" item in this test case will use the node name in | +| | the pod.yaml. | +| | | ++--------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+ +|test sequence | description and expected result | +| | | ++--------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+ +|step 1 | start monitors: | +| | each monitor will run with independently process | +| | | +| | Result: The monitor info will be collected. | +| | | ++--------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+ +|step 2 | do attacker: connect the host through SSH, and then execute | +| | shutdown script on the host | +| | | +| | Result: The host will be shutdown. | +| | | ++--------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+ +|step 3 | stop monitors after a period of time specified by | +| | "waiting_time" | +| | | +| | Result: All monitor result will be aggregated. | +| | | ++--------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+ +|step 4 | verify the SLA | +| | | +| | Result: The test case is passed or not. | +| | | ++--------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+ +|post-action | It is the action when the test cases exist. It restarts the | +| | specified controller node if it is not restarted. | +| | | ++--------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+ +|test verdict | Fails only if SLA is not passed, or if there is a test case | +| | execution problem. | +| | | ++--------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+ |