diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'docs/release/results')
| -rw-r--r-- | docs/release/results/index.rst | 14 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | docs/release/results/os-nosdn-kvm-ha.rst | 270 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | docs/release/results/os-nosdn-nofeature-ha.rst | 492 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | docs/release/results/os-nosdn-nofeature-noha.rst | 259 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | docs/release/results/os-odl_l2-bgpvpn-ha.rst | 53 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | docs/release/results/os-odl_l2-nofeature-ha.rst | 743 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | docs/release/results/os-odl_l2-sfc-ha.rst | 231 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | docs/release/results/os-onos-nofeature-ha.rst | 257 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | docs/release/results/os-onos-sfc-ha.rst | 517 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | docs/release/results/overview.rst | 106 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | docs/release/results/results.rst | 57 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | docs/release/results/yardstick-opnfv-ha.rst | 118 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | docs/release/results/yardstick-opnfv-kvm.rst | 38 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | docs/release/results/yardstick-opnfv-parser.rst | 38 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | docs/release/results/yardstick-opnfv-vtc.rst | 248 |
15 files changed, 3441 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/docs/release/results/index.rst b/docs/release/results/index.rst new file mode 100644 index 000000000..2b67f1b22 --- /dev/null +++ b/docs/release/results/index.rst @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@ +.. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International +.. License. +.. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 +.. (c) OPNFV, Ericsson AB and others. + +====================== +Yardstick test results +====================== + +.. toctree:: + :maxdepth: 4 + +.. include:: ./overview.rst +.. include:: ./results.rst diff --git a/docs/release/results/os-nosdn-kvm-ha.rst b/docs/release/results/os-nosdn-kvm-ha.rst new file mode 100644 index 000000000..a8a56f80e --- /dev/null +++ b/docs/release/results/os-nosdn-kvm-ha.rst @@ -0,0 +1,270 @@ +.. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International +.. License. +.. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 + + +================================ +Test Results for os-nosdn-kvm-ha +================================ + +.. toctree:: + :maxdepth: 2 + + +fuel +==== + +.. _Grafana: http://testresults.opnfv.org/grafana/dashboard/db/yardstick-main +.. _POD2: https://wiki.opnfv.org/pharos?&#community_test_labs + +Overview of test results +------------------------ + +See Grafana_ for viewing test result metrics for each respective test case. It +is possible to chose which specific scenarios to look at, and then to zoom in +on the details of each run test scenario as well. + +All of the test case results below are based on 4 scenario test +runs, each run on the Ericsson POD2_ or LF POD2_ between August 24 and 30 in +2016. + +TC002 +----- +The round-trip-time (RTT) between 2 VMs on different blades is measured using +ping. Most test run measurements result on average between 0.44 and 0.75 ms. +A few runs start with a 0.65 - 0.68 ms RTT spike (This could be because of +normal ARP handling). One test run has a greater RTT spike of 1.49 ms. +To be able to draw conclusions more runs should be made. SLA set to 10 ms. +The SLA value is used as a reference, it has not been defined by OPNFV. + +TC005 +----- +The IO read bandwidth looks similar between different dates, with an +average between approx. 92 and 204 MB/s. Within each test run the results +vary, with a minimum 2 MB/s and maximum 819 MB/s on the totality. Most runs +have a minimum BW of 3 MB/s (one run at 2 MB/s). The maximum BW varies more in +absolute numbers between the dates, between 238 and 819 MB/s. +SLA set to 400 MB/s. The SLA value is used as a reference, it has not been +defined by OPNFV. + +TC010 +----- +The measurements for memory latency are similar between test dates and result +in approx. 2.07 ns. The variations within each test run are similar, between +1.41 and 3.53 ns. +SLA set to 30 ns. The SLA value is used as a reference, it has not been defined +by OPNFV. + +TC011 +----- +Packet delay variation between 2 VMs on different blades is measured using +Iperf3. The reported packet delay variation varies between 0.0051 and 0.0243 ms, +with an average delay variation between 0.0081 ms and 0.0195 ms. + +TC012 +----- +Between test dates, the average measurements for memory bandwidth result in +approx. 13.6 GB/s. Within each test run the results vary more, with a minimal +BW of 6.09 GB/s and maximum of 16.47 GB/s on the totality. +SLA set to 15 GB/s. The SLA value is used as a reference, it has not been +defined by OPNFV. + +TC014 +----- +The Unixbench processor test run results vary between scores 2316 and 3619, +one result each date. +No SLA set. + +TC037 +----- +The amount of packets per second (PPS) and round trip times (RTT) between 2 VMs +on different blades are measured when increasing the amount of UDP flows sent +between the VMs using pktgen as packet generator tool. + +Round trip times and packet throughput between VMs can typically be affected by +the amount of flows set up and result in higher RTT and less PPS throughput. + +The RTT results are similar throughout the different test dates and runs at +approx. 15 ms. Some test runs show an increase with many flows, in the range +towards 16 to 17 ms. One exception standing out is Feb. 15 where the average +RTT is stable at approx. 13 ms. The PPS results are not as consistent as the +RTT results. +In some test runs when running with less than approx. 10000 flows the PPS +throughput is normally flatter compared to when running with more flows, after +which the PPS throughput decreases. Around 20 percent decrease in the worst +case. For the other test runs there is however no significant change to the PPS +throughput when the number of flows are increased. In some test runs the PPS +is also greater with 1000000 flows compared to other test runs where the PPS +result is less with only 2 flows. + +The average PPS throughput in the different runs varies between 414000 and +452000 PPS. The total amount of packets in each test run is approx. 7500000 to +8200000 packets. One test run Feb. 15 sticks out with a PPS average of +558000 and approx. 1100000 packets in total (same as the on mentioned earlier +for RTT results). + +There are lost packets reported in most of the test runs. There is no observed +correlation between the amount of flows and the amount of lost packets. +The lost amount of packets normally range between 100 and 1000 per test run, +but there are spikes in the range of 10000 lost packets as well, and even +more in a rare cases. + +CPU utilization statistics are collected during UDP flows sent between the VMs +using pktgen as packet generator tool. The average measurements for CPU +utilization ratio vary between 1% to 2%. The peak of CPU utilization ratio +appears around 7%. + +TC069 +----- +Between test dates, the average measurements for memory bandwidth vary between +22.6 and 29.1 GB/s. Within each test run the results vary more, with a minimal +BW of 20.0 GB/s and maximum of 29.5 GB/s on the totality. +SLA set to 6 GB/s. The SLA value is used as a reference, it has not been +defined by OPNFV. + + +TC070 +----- +The amount of packets per second (PPS) and round trip times (RTT) between 2 VMs +on different blades are measured when increasing the amount of UDP flows sent +between the VMs using pktgen as packet generator tool. + +Round trip times and packet throughput between VMs can typically be affected by +the amount of flows set up and result in higher RTT and less PPS throughput. + +The RTT results are similar throughout the different test dates and runs at +approx. 15 ms. Some test runs show an increase with many flows, in the range +towards 16 to 17 ms. One exception standing out is Feb. 15 where the average +RTT is stable at approx. 13 ms. The PPS results are not as consistent as the +RTT results. +In some test runs when running with less than approx. 10000 flows the PPS +throughput is normally flatter compared to when running with more flows, after +which the PPS throughput decreases. Around 20 percent decrease in the worst +case. For the other test runs there is however no significant change to the PPS +throughput when the number of flows are increased. In some test runs the PPS +is also greater with 1000000 flows compared to other test runs where the PPS +result is less with only 2 flows. + +The average PPS throughput in the different runs varies between 414000 and +452000 PPS. The total amount of packets in each test run is approx. 7500000 to +8200000 packets. One test run Feb. 15 sticks out with a PPS average of +558000 and approx. 1100000 packets in total (same as the on mentioned earlier +for RTT results). + +There are lost packets reported in most of the test runs. There is no observed +correlation between the amount of flows and the amount of lost packets. +The lost amount of packets normally range between 100 and 1000 per test run, +but there are spikes in the range of 10000 lost packets as well, and even +more in a rare cases. + +Memory utilization statistics are collected during UDP flows sent between the +VMs using pktgen as packet generator tool. The average measurements for memory +utilization vary between 225MB to 246MB. The peak of memory utilization appears +around 340MB. + +TC071 +----- +The amount of packets per second (PPS) and round trip times (RTT) between 2 VMs +on different blades are measured when increasing the amount of UDP flows sent +between the VMs using pktgen as packet generator tool. + +Round trip times and packet throughput between VMs can typically be affected by +the amount of flows set up and result in higher RTT and less PPS throughput. + +The RTT results are similar throughout the different test dates and runs at +approx. 15 ms. Some test runs show an increase with many flows, in the range +towards 16 to 17 ms. One exception standing out is Feb. 15 where the average +RTT is stable at approx. 13 ms. The PPS results are not as consistent as the +RTT results. +In some test runs when running with less than approx. 10000 flows the PPS +throughput is normally flatter compared to when running with more flows, after +which the PPS throughput decreases. Around 20 percent decrease in the worst +case. For the other test runs there is however no significant change to the PPS +throughput when the number of flows are increased. In some test runs the PPS +is also greater with 1000000 flows compared to other test runs where the PPS +result is less with only 2 flows. + +The average PPS throughput in the different runs varies between 414000 and +452000 PPS. The total amount of packets in each test run is approx. 7500000 to +8200000 packets. One test run Feb. 15 sticks out with a PPS average of +558000 and approx. 1100000 packets in total (same as the on mentioned earlier +for RTT results). + +There are lost packets reported in most of the test runs. There is no observed +correlation between the amount of flows and the amount of lost packets. +The lost amount of packets normally range between 100 and 1000 per test run, +but there are spikes in the range of 10000 lost packets as well, and even +more in a rare cases. + +Cache utilization statistics are collected during UDP flows sent between the +VMs using pktgen as packet generator tool. The average measurements for cache +utilization vary between 205MB to 212MB. + +TC072 +----- +The amount of packets per second (PPS) and round trip times (RTT) between 2 VMs +on different blades are measured when increasing the amount of UDP flows sent +between the VMs using pktgen as packet generator tool. + +Round trip times and packet throughput between VMs can typically be affected by +the amount of flows set up and result in higher RTT and less PPS throughput. + +The RTT results are similar throughout the different test dates and runs at +approx. 15 ms. Some test runs show an increase with many flows, in the range +towards 16 to 17 ms. One exception standing out is Feb. 15 where the average +RTT is stable at approx. 13 ms. The PPS results are not as consistent as the +RTT results. +In some test runs when running with less than approx. 10000 flows the PPS +throughput is normally flatter compared to when running with more flows, after +which the PPS throughput decreases. Around 20 percent decrease in the worst +case. For the other test runs there is however no significant change to the PPS +throughput when the number of flows are increased. In some test runs the PPS +is also greater with 1000000 flows compared to other test runs where the PPS +result is less with only 2 flows. + +The average PPS throughput in the different runs varies between 414000 and +452000 PPS. The total amount of packets in each test run is approx. 7500000 to +8200000 packets. One test run Feb. 15 sticks out with a PPS average of +558000 and approx. 1100000 packets in total (same as the on mentioned earlier +for RTT results). + +There are lost packets reported in most of the test runs. There is no observed +correlation between the amount of flows and the amount of lost packets. +The lost amount of packets normally range between 100 and 1000 per test run, +but there are spikes in the range of 10000 lost packets as well, and even +more in a rare cases. + +Network utilization statistics are collected during UDP flows sent between the +VMs using pktgen as packet generator tool. Total number of packets received per +second was average on 200 kpps and total number of packets transmitted per +second was average on 600 kpps. + +Detailed test results +--------------------- +The scenario was run on Ericsson POD2_ and LF POD2_ with: +Fuel 9.0 +OpenStack Mitaka +OpenVirtualSwitch 2.5.90 +OpenDayLight Beryllium + +Rationale for decisions +----------------------- +Pass + +Tests were successfully executed and metrics collected. +No SLA was verified. To be decided on in next release of OPNFV. + +Conclusions and recommendations +------------------------------- +The pktgen test configuration has a relatively large base effect on RTT in +TC037 compared to TC002, where there is no background load at all. Approx. +15 ms compared to approx. 0.5 ms, which is more than a 3000 percentage +difference in RTT results. +Especially RTT and throughput come out with better results than for instance +the *fuel-os-nosdn-nofeature-ha* scenario does. The reason for this should +probably be further analyzed and understood. Also of interest could be +to make further analyzes to find patterns and reasons for lost traffic. +Also of interest could be to see if there are continuous variations where +some test cases stand out with better or worse results than the general test +case. + diff --git a/docs/release/results/os-nosdn-nofeature-ha.rst b/docs/release/results/os-nosdn-nofeature-ha.rst new file mode 100644 index 000000000..9e52731d5 --- /dev/null +++ b/docs/release/results/os-nosdn-nofeature-ha.rst @@ -0,0 +1,492 @@ +.. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International +.. License. +.. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 + + +====================================== +Test Results for os-nosdn-nofeature-ha +====================================== + +.. toctree:: + :maxdepth: 2 + + +apex +==== + +.. _Grafana: http://testresults.opnfv.org/grafana/dashboard/db/yardstick-main +.. _POD1: https://wiki.opnfv.org/pharos?&#community_test_labs + + +Overview of test results +------------------------ + +See Grafana_ for viewing test result metrics for each respective test case. It +is possible to chose which specific scenarios to look at, and then to zoom in +on the details of each run test scenario as well. + +All of the test case results below are based on 4 scenario test +runs, each run on the LF POD1_ between August 25 and 28 in +2016. + +TC002 +----- +The round-trip-time (RTT) between 2 VMs on different blades is measured using +ping. Most test run measurements result on average between 0.74 and 1.08 ms. +A few runs start with a 0.99 - 1.07 ms RTT spike (This could be because of +normal ARP handling). One test run has a greater RTT spike of 1.35 ms. +To be able to draw conclusions more runs should be made. SLA set to 10 ms. +The SLA value is used as a reference, it has not been defined by OPNFV. + +TC005 +----- +The IO read bandwidth looks similar between different dates, with an +average between approx. 128 and 136 MB/s. Within each test run the results +vary, with a minimum 5 MB/s and maximum 446 MB/s on the totality. Most runs +have a minimum BW of 5 MB/s (one run at 6 MB/s). The maximum BW varies more in +absolute numbers between the dates, between 416 and 446 MB/s. +SLA set to 400 MB/s. The SLA value is used as a reference, it has not been +defined by OPNFV. + +TC010 +----- +The measurements for memory latency are similar between test dates and result +in approx. 1.09 ns. The variations within each test run are similar, between +1.0860 and 1.0880 ns. +SLA set to 30 ns. The SLA value is used as a reference, it has not been defined +by OPNFV. + +TC011 +----- +Packet delay variation between 2 VMs on different blades is measured using +Iperf3. The reported packet delay variation varies between 0.0025 and 0.0148 ms, +with an average delay variation between 0.0056 ms and 0.0157 ms. + +TC012 +----- +Between test dates, the average measurements for memory bandwidth result in +approx. 19.70 GB/s. Within each test run the results vary more, with a minimal +BW of 18.16 GB/s and maximum of 20.13 GB/s on the totality. +SLA set to 15 GB/s. The SLA value is used as a reference, it has not been +defined by OPNFV. + +TC014 +----- +The Unixbench processor test run results vary between scores 3224.4 and 3842.8, +one result each date. The average score on the total is 3659.5. +No SLA set. + +TC037 +----- +The amount of packets per second (PPS) and round trip times (RTT) between 2 VMs +on different blades are measured when increasing the amount of UDP flows sent +between the VMs using pktgen as packet generator tool. + +Round trip times and packet throughput between VMs can typically be affected by +the amount of flows set up and result in higher RTT and less PPS throughput. + +The RTT results are similar throughout the different test dates and runs at +approx. 15 ms. Some test runs show an increase with many flows, in the range +towards 16 to 17 ms. One exception standing out is Feb. 15 where the average +RTT is stable at approx. 13 ms. The PPS results are not as consistent as the +RTT results. +In some test runs when running with less than approx. 10000 flows the PPS +throughput is normally flatter compared to when running with more flows, after +which the PPS throughput decreases. Around 20 percent decrease in the worst +case. For the other test runs there is however no significant change to the PPS +throughput when the number of flows are increased. In some test runs the PPS +is also greater with 1000000 flows compared to other test runs where the PPS +result is less with only 2 flows. + +The average PPS throughput in the different runs varies between 414000 and +452000 PPS. The total amount of packets in each test run is approx. 7500000 to +8200000 packets. One test run Feb. 15 sticks out with a PPS average of +558000 and approx. 1100000 packets in total (same as the on mentioned earlier +for RTT results). + +There are lost packets reported in most of the test runs. There is no observed +correlation between the amount of flows and the amount of lost packets. +The lost amount of packets normally range between 100 and 1000 per test run, +but there are spikes in the range of 10000 lost packets as well, and even +more in a rare cases. + +CPU utilization statistics are collected during UDP flows sent between the VMs +using pktgen as packet generator tool. The average measurements for CPU +utilization ratio vary between 1% to 2%. The peak of CPU utilization ratio +appears around 7%. + +TC069 +----- +Between test dates, the average measurements for memory bandwidth vary between +22.6 and 29.1 GB/s. Within each test run the results vary more, with a minimal +BW of 20.0 GB/s and maximum of 29.5 GB/s on the totality. +SLA set to 6 GB/s. The SLA value is used as a reference, it has not been +defined by OPNFV. + +TC070 +----- +The amount of packets per second (PPS) and round trip times (RTT) between 2 VMs +on different blades are measured when increasing the amount of UDP flows sent +between the VMs using pktgen as packet generator tool. + +Round trip times and packet throughput between VMs can typically be affected by +the amount of flows set up and result in higher RTT and less PPS throughput. + +The RTT results are similar throughout the different test dates and runs at +approx. 15 ms. Some test runs show an increase with many flows, in the range +towards 16 to 17 ms. One exception standing out is Feb. 15 where the average +RTT is stable at approx. 13 ms. The PPS results are not as consistent as the +RTT results. +In some test runs when running with less than approx. 10000 flows the PPS +throughput is normally flatter compared to when running with more flows, after +which the PPS throughput decreases. Around 20 percent decrease in the worst +case. For the other test runs there is however no significant change to the PPS +throughput when the number of flows are increased. In some test runs the PPS +is also greater with 1000000 flows compared to other test runs where the PPS +result is less with only 2 flows. + +The average PPS throughput in the different runs varies between 414000 and +452000 PPS. The total amount of packets in each test run is approx. 7500000 to +8200000 packets. One test run Feb. 15 sticks out with a PPS average of +558000 and approx. 1100000 packets in total (same as the on mentioned earlier +for RTT results). + +There are lost packets reported in most of the test runs. There is no observed +correlation between the amount of flows and the amount of lost packets. +The lost amount of packets normally range between 100 and 1000 per test run, +but there are spikes in the range of 10000 lost packets as well, and even +more in a rare cases. + +Memory utilization statistics are collected during UDP flows sent between the +VMs using pktgen as packet generator tool. The average measurements for memory +utilization vary between 225MB to 246MB. The peak of memory utilization appears +around 340MB. + +TC071 +----- +The amount of packets per second (PPS) and round trip times (RTT) between 2 VMs +on different blades are measured when increasing the amount of UDP flows sent +between the VMs using pktgen as packet generator tool. + +Round trip times and packet throughput between VMs can typically be affected by +the amount of flows set up and result in higher RTT and less PPS throughput. + +The RTT results are similar throughout the different test dates and runs at +approx. 15 ms. Some test runs show an increase with many flows, in the range +towards 16 to 17 ms. One exception standing out is Feb. 15 where the average +RTT is stable at approx. 13 ms. The PPS results are not as consistent as the +RTT results. +In some test runs when running with less than approx. 10000 flows the PPS +throughput is normally flatter compared to when running with more flows, after +which the PPS throughput decreases. Around 20 percent decrease in the worst +case. For the other test runs there is however no significant change to the PPS +throughput when the number of flows are increased. In some test runs the PPS +is also greater with 1000000 flows compared to other test runs where the PPS +result is less with only 2 flows. + +The average PPS throughput in the different runs varies between 414000 and +452000 PPS. The total amount of packets in each test run is approx. 7500000 to +8200000 packets. One test run Feb. 15 sticks out with a PPS average of +558000 and approx. 1100000 packets in total (same as the on mentioned earlier +for RTT results). + +There are lost packets reported in most of the test runs. There is no observed +correlation between the amount of flows and the amount of lost packets. +The lost amount of packets normally range between 100 and 1000 per test run, +but there are spikes in the range of 10000 lost packets as well, and even +more in a rare cases. + +Cache utilization statistics are collected during UDP flows sent between the +VMs using pktgen as packet generator tool. The average measurements for cache +utilization vary between 205MB to 212MB. + +TC072 +----- +The amount of packets per second (PPS) and round trip times (RTT) between 2 VMs +on different blades are measured when increasing the amount of UDP flows sent +between the VMs using pktgen as packet generator tool. + +Round trip times and packet throughput between VMs can typically be affected by +the amount of flows set up and result in higher RTT and less PPS throughput. + +The RTT results are similar throughout the different test dates and runs at +approx. 15 ms. Some test runs show an increase with many flows, in the range +towards 16 to 17 ms. One exception standing out is Feb. 15 where the average +RTT is stable at approx. 13 ms. The PPS results are not as consistent as the +RTT results. +In some test runs when running with less than approx. 10000 flows the PPS +throughput is normally flatter compared to when running with more flows, after +which the PPS throughput decreases. Around 20 percent decrease in the worst +case. For the other test runs there is however no significant change to the PPS +throughput when the number of flows are increased. In some test runs the PPS +is also greater with 1000000 flows compared to other test runs where the PPS +result is less with only 2 flows. + +The average PPS throughput in the different runs varies between 414000 and +452000 PPS. The total amount of packets in each test run is approx. 7500000 to +8200000 packets. One test run Feb. 15 sticks out with a PPS average of +558000 and approx. 1100000 packets in total (same as the on mentioned earlier +for RTT results). + +There are lost packets reported in most of the test runs. There is no observed +correlation between the amount of flows and the amount of lost packets. +The lost amount of packets normally range between 100 and 1000 per test run, +but there are spikes in the range of 10000 lost packets as well, and even +more in a rare cases. + +Network utilization statistics are collected during UDP flows sent between the +VMs using pktgen as packet generator tool. Total number of packets received per +second was average on 200 kpps and total number of packets transmitted per +second was average on 600 kpps. + +Detailed test results +--------------------- +The scenario was run on LF POD1_ with: +Apex +OpenStack Mitaka +OpenVirtualSwitch 2.5.90 +OpenDayLight Beryllium + +Rationale for decisions +----------------------- +Pass + +Tests were successfully executed and metrics collected. +No SLA was verified. To be decided on in next release of OPNFV. + + +Joid +==== + +.. _Grafana: http://testresults.opnfv.org/grafana/dashboard/db/yardstick-main +.. _POD5: https://wiki.opnfv.org/pharos?&#community_test_labs + + +Overview of test results +------------------------ + +See Grafana_ for viewing test result metrics for each respective test case. It +is possible to chose which specific scenarios to look at, and then to zoom in +on the details of each run test scenario as well. + +All of the test case results below are based on 4 scenario test runs, each run +on the Intel POD5_ between September 11 and 14 in 2016. + +TC002 +----- +The round-trip-time (RTT) between 2 VMs on different blades is measured using +ping. Most test run measurements result on average between 1.59 and 1.70 ms. +Two test runs have reached the same greater RTT spike of 3.06 ms, which are +1.66 and 1.70 ms average, but only one has the lower RTT of 1.35 ms. The other +two runs have no similar spike at all. To be able to draw conclusions more runs +should be made. SLA set to be 10 ms. The SLA value is used as a reference, it +has not been defined by OPNFV. + +TC005 +----- +The IO read bandwidth actually refers to the storage throughput and the +greatest IO read bandwidth of the four runs is 173.3 MB/s. The IO read +bandwidth of the four runs looks similar on different four days, with an +average between 32.7 and 60.4 MB/s. One of the runs has a minimum BW of 429 +KM/s and other has a maximum BW of 173.3 MB/s. The SLA of read bandwidth sets +to be 400 MB/s, which is used as a reference, and it has not been defined by +OPNFV. + +TC010 +----- +The tool we use to measure memory read latency is lmbench, which is a series of +micro benchmarks intended to measure basic operating system and hardware system +metrics. The memory read latency of the four runs is 1.1 ns on average. The +variations within each test run are different, some vary from a large range and +others have a small change. For example, the largest change is on September 14, +the memory read latency of which is ranging from 1.12 ns to 1.22 ns. However, +the results on September 12 change very little, which range from 1.14 ns to +1.17 ns. The SLA sets to be 30 ns. The SLA value is used as a reference, it has +not been defined by OPNFV. + +TC011 +----- +Iperf3 is a tool for evaluating the pocket delay variation between 2 VMs on +different blades. The reported pocket delay variations of the four test runs +differ from each other. The results on September 13 within the date look +similar and the values are between 0.0087 and 0.0190 ms, which is 0.0126 ms on +average. However, on the fourth day, the pocket delay variation has a large +wide change within the date, which ranges from 0.0032 ms to 0.0121 ms and has +the minimum average value. The pocket delay variations of other two test runs +look relatively similar, which are 0.0076 ms and 0.0152 ms on average. The SLA +value sets to be 10 ms. The SLA value is used as a reference, it has not been +defined by OPNFV. + +TC012 +----- +Lmbench is also used to measure the memory read and write bandwidth, in which +we use bw_mem to obtain the results. Among the four test runs, the memory +bandwidth within the second day almost keep stable, which is 11.58 GB/s on +average. And the memory bandwidth of the fourth day look similar as that of the +second day, both of which remain stable. The other two test runs relatively +change from a large wide range, in which the minimum memory bandwidth is 11.22 +GB/s and the maximum bandwidth is 16.65 GB/s with an average bandwidth of about +12.20 GB/s. Here SLA set to be 15 GB/s. The SLA value is used as a reference, +it has not been defined by OPNFV. + +TC014 +----- +The Unixbench is used to measure processing speed, that is instructions per +second. It can be seen from the dashboard that the processing test results +vary from scores 3272 to 3444, and there is only one result one date. The +overall average score is 3371. No SLA set. + +TC037 +----- +The amount of packets per second (PPS) and round trip times (RTT) between 2 VMs +on different blades are measured when increasing the amount of UDP flows sent +between the VMs using pktgen as packet generator tool. + +Round trip times and packet throughput between VMs can typically be affected by +the amount of flows set up and result in higher RTT and less PPS throughput. + +The mean packet throughput of the four test runs is 119.85, 128.02, 121.40 and +126.08 kpps, of which the result of the second is the highest. The RTT results +of all the test runs keep flat at approx. 37 ms. It is obvious that the PPS +results are not as consistent as the RTT results. + +The No. flows of the four test runs are 240 k on average and the PPS results +look a little waved since the largest packet throughput is 184 kpps and the +minimum throughput is 49 K respectively. + +There are no errors of packets received in the four runs, but there are still +lost packets in all the test runs. The RTT values obtained by ping of the four +runs have the similar average vaue, that is 38 ms, of which the worest RTT is +93 ms on Sep. 14th. + +CPU load of the four test runs have a large change, since the minimum value and +the peak of CPU load is 0 percent and 51 percent respectively. And the best +result is obtained on Sep. 14th. + +TC069 +----- +With the block size changing from 1 kb to 512 kb, the memory write bandwidth +tends to become larger first and then smaller within every run test, which +rangs from 22.3 GB/s to 26.8 GB/s and then to 18.5 GB/s on average. Since the +test id is one, it is that only the INT memory write bandwidth is tested. On +the whole, when the block size is 8 kb and 16 kb, the memory write bandwidth +look similar with a minimal BW of 22.5 GB/s and peak value of 28.7 GB/s. SLA +sets to be 7 GB/s. The SLA value is used as a a reference, it has not been +defined by OPNFV. + +TC070 +----- +The amount of packets per second (PPS) and round trip times (RTT) between 2 VMs +on different blades are measured when increasing the amount of UDP flows sent +between the VMs using pktgen as packet generator tool. + +Round trip times and packet throughput between VMs can typically be affected by +the amount of flows set up and result in higher RTT and less PPS throughput. + +The network latency is measured by ping, and the results of the four test runs +look similar with each other. Within each test run, the maximum RTT can reach +more than 80 ms and the average RTT is usually approx. 38 ms. On the whole, the +average RTTs of the four runs keep flat. + +Memory utilization is measured by free, which can display amount of free and +used memory in the system. The largest amount of used memory is 268 MiB on Sep +14, which also has the largest minimum memory. Besides, the rest three test +runs have the similar used memory. On the other hand, the free memory of the +four runs have the same smallest minimum value, that is about 223 MiB, and the +maximum free memory of three runs have the similar result, that is 337 MiB, +except that on Sep. 14th, whose maximum free memory is 254 MiB. On the whole, +all the test runs have similar average free memory. + +Network throughput and packet loss can be measured by pktgen, which is a tool +in the network for generating traffic loads for network experiments. The mean +network throughput of the four test runs seem quite different, ranging from +119.85 kpps to 128.02 kpps. The average number of flows in these tests is +24000, and each run has a minimum number of flows of 2 and a maximum number +of flows of 1.001 Mil. At the same time, the corresponding packet throughput +differ between 49.4k and 193.3k with an average packet throughput of approx. +125k. On the whole, the PPS results seem consistent. Within each test run of +the four runs, when number of flows becomes larger, the packet throughput seems +not larger in the meantime. + +TC071 +----- +The amount of packets per second (PPS) and round trip times (RTT) between 2 VMs +on different blades are measured when increasing the amount of UDP flows sent +between the VMs using pktgen as packet generator tool. + +Round trip times and packet throughput between VMs can typically be affected by +the amount of flows set up and result in higher RTT and less PPS throughput. + +The network latency is measured by ping, and the results of the four test runs +look similar with each other. Within each test run, the maximum RTT can reach +more than 94 ms and the average RTT is usually approx. 35 ms. On the whole, the +average RTTs of the four runs keep flat. + +Cache utilization is measured by cachestat, which can display size of cache and +buffer in the system. Cache utilization statistics are collected during UDP +flows sent between the VMs using pktgen as packet generator tool.The largest +cache size is 212 MiB in the four runs, and the smallest cache size is 75 MiB. +On the whole, the average cache size of the four runs is approx. 208 MiB. +Meanwhile, the tread of the buffer size looks similar with each other. + +Packet throughput can be measured by pktgen, which is a tool in the network for +generating traffic loads for network experiments. The mean packet throughput of +the four test runs seem quite different, ranging from 119.85 kpps to 128.02 +kpps. The average number of flows in these tests is 239.7k, and each run has a +minimum number of flows of 2 and a maximum number of flows of 1.001 Mil. At the +same time, the corresponding packet throughput differ between 49.4k and 193.3k +with an average packet throughput of approx. 125k. On the whole, the PPS results +seem consistent. Within each test run of the four runs, when number of flows +becomes larger, the packet throughput seems not larger in the meantime. + +TC072 +----- +The amount of packets per second (PPS) and round trip times (RTT) between 2 VMs +on different blades are measured when increasing the amount of UDP flows sent +between the VMs using pktgen as packet generator tool. + +Round trip times and packet throughput between VMs can typically be affected by +the amount of flows set up and result in higher RTT and less PPS throughput. + +The RTT results are similar throughout the different test dates and runs at +approx. 32 ms. The PPS results are not as consistent as the RTT results. + +Network utilization is measured by sar, that is system activity reporter, which +can display the average statistics for the time since the system was started. +Network utilization statistics are collected during UDP flows sent between the +VMs using pktgen as packet generator tool. The largest total number of packets +transmitted per second differs from each other, in which the smallest number of +packets transmitted per second is 6 pps on Sep. 12ed and the largest of that is +210.8 kpps. Meanwhile, the largest total number of packets received per second +differs from each other, in which the smallest number of packets received per +second is 2 pps on Sep. 13rd and the largest of that is 250.2 kpps. + +In some test runs when running with less than approx. 90000 flows the PPS +throughput is normally flatter compared to when running with more flows, after +which the PPS throughput decreases. For the other test runs there is however no +significant change to the PPS throughput when the number of flows are +increased. In some test runs the PPS is also greater with 1000000 flows +compared to other test runs where the PPS result is less with only 2 flows. + +There are lost packets reported in most of the test runs. There is no observed +correlation between the amount of flows and the amount of lost packets. +The lost amount of packets normally differs a lot per test run. + +Detailed test results +--------------------- +The scenario was run on Intel POD5_ with: +Joid +OpenStack Mitaka +OpenVirtualSwitch 2.5.90 +OpenDayLight Beryllium + +Rationale for decisions +----------------------- +Pass + +Conclusions and recommendations +------------------------------- +Tests were successfully executed and metrics collected. +No SLA was verified. To be decided on in next release of OPNFV. + + diff --git a/docs/release/results/os-nosdn-nofeature-noha.rst b/docs/release/results/os-nosdn-nofeature-noha.rst new file mode 100644 index 000000000..8b7c184bb --- /dev/null +++ b/docs/release/results/os-nosdn-nofeature-noha.rst @@ -0,0 +1,259 @@ +.. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International +.. License. +.. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 + + +======================================== +Test Results for os-nosdn-nofeature-noha +======================================== + +.. toctree:: + :maxdepth: 2 + + +Joid +===== + +.. _Grafana: http://testresults.opnfv.org/grafana/dashboard/db/yardstick-main +.. _POD5: https://wiki.opnfv.org/pharos?&#community_test_labs + +Overview of test results +------------------------ + +See Grafana_ for viewing test result metrics for each respective test case. It +is possible to chose which specific scenarios to look at, and then to zoom in +on the details of each run test scenario as well. + +All of the test case results below are based on 4 scenario test runs, each run +on the Intel POD5_ between September 12 and 15 in 2016. + +TC002 +----- +The round-trip-time (RTT) between 2 VMs on different blades is measured using +ping. Most test run measurements result on average between 1.50 and 1.68 ms. +Only one test run has reached greatest RTT spike of 2.92 ms, which has +the smallest RTT of 1.06 ms. The other three runs have no similar spike at all, +the minimum and average RTTs of which are approx. 1.50 ms and 1.68 ms. SLA set to +be 10 ms. The SLA value is used as a reference, it has not been defined by +OPNFV. + +TC005 +----- +The IO read bandwidth actually refers to the storage throughput, which is +measured by fio and the greatest IO read bandwidth of the four runs is 177.5 +MB/s. The IO read bandwidth of the four runs looks similar on different four +days, with an average between 46.7 and 62.5 MB/s. One of the runs has a minimum +BW of 680 KM/s and other has a maximum BW of 177.5 MB/s. The SLA of read +bandwidth sets to be 400 MB/s, which is used as a reference, and it has not +been defined by OPNFV. + +The results of storage IOPS for the four runs look similar with each other. The +test runs all have an approx. 1.55 K/s for IO reading with an minimum value of +less than 60 times per second. + +TC010 +----- +The tool we use to measure memory read latency is lmbench, which is a series of +micro benchmarks intended to measure basic operating system and hardware system +metrics. The memory read latency of the four runs is between 1.134 ns and 1.227 +ns on average. The variations within each test run are quite different, some +vary from a large range and others have a small change. For example, the +largest change is on September 15, the memory read latency of which is ranging +from 1.116 ns to 1.393 ns. However, the results on September 12 change very +little, which mainly keep flat and range from 1.124 ns to 1.55 ns. The SLA sets +to be 30 ns. The SLA value is used as a reference, it has not been defined by +OPNFV. + +TC011 +----- +Iperf3 is a tool for evaluating the pocket delay variation between 2 VMs on +different blades. The reported pocket delay variations of the four test runs +differ from each other. The results on September 13 within the date look +similar and the values are between 0.0213 and 0.0225 ms, which is 0.0217 ms on +average. However, on the third day, the packet delay variation has a large +wide change within the date, which ranges from 0.008 ms to 0.0225 ms and has +the minimum value. On Sep. 12, the packet delay is quite long, for the value is +between 0.0236 and 0.0287 ms and it also has the maximum packet delay of 0.0287 +ms. The packet delay of the last test run is 0.0151 ms on average. The SLA +value sets to be 10 ms. The SLA value is used as a reference, it has not been +defined by OPNFV. + +TC012 +----- +Lmbench is also used to measure the memory read and write bandwidth, in which +we use bw_mem to obtain the results. Among the four test runs, the memory +bandwidth of three test runs almost keep stable within each run, which is +11.65, 11.57 and 11.64 GB/s on average. However, the memory read and write +bandwidth on Sep. 14 has a large range, for it ranges from 11.36 GB/s to 16.68 +GB/s. Here SLA set to be 15 GB/s. The SLA value is used as a reference, it has +not been defined by OPNFV. + +TC014 +----- +The Unixbench is used to evaluate the IaaS processing speed with regards to +score of single cpu running and parallel running. It can be seen from the +dashboard that the processing test results vary from scores 3222 to 3585, and +there is only one result one date. No SLA set. + +TC037 +----- +The amount of packets per second (PPS) and round trip times (RTT) between 2 VMs +on different blades are measured when increasing the amount of UDP flows sent +between the VMs using pktgen as packet generator tool. + +Round trip times and packet throughput between VMs can typically be affected by +the amount of flows set up and result in higher RTT and less PPS throughput. + +The mean packet throughput of the four test runs is 124.8, 160.1, 113.8 and +137.3 kpps, of which the result of the second is the highest. The RTT results +of all the test runs keep flat at approx. 37 ms. It is obvious that the PPS +results are not as consistent as the RTT results. + +The No. flows of the four test runs are 240 k on average and the PPS results +look a little waved since the largest packet throughput is 243.1 kpps and the +minimum throughput is 37.6 kpps respectively. + +There are no errors of packets received in the four runs, but there are still +lost packets in all the test runs. The RTT values obtained by ping of the four +runs have the similar average vaue, that is between 32 ms and 41 ms, of which +the worest RTT is 155 ms on Sep. 14th. + +CPU load is measured by mpstat, and CPU load of the four test runs seem a +little similar, since the minimum value and the peak of CPU load is between 0 +percent and 9 percent respectively. And the best result is obtained on Sep. +15th, with an CPU load of nine percent. + +TC069 +----- +With the block size changing from 1 kb to 512 kb, the memory write bandwidth +tends to become larger first and then smaller within every run test, which +rangs from 22.4 GB/s to 26.5 GB/s and then to 18.6 GB/s on average. Since the +test id is one, it is that only the INT memory write bandwidth is tested. On +the whole, when the block size is 8 kb and 16 kb, the memory write bandwidth +look similar with a minimal BW of 22.5 GB/s and peak value of 28.7 GB/s. And +then with the block size becoming larger, the memory write bandwidth tends to +decrease. SLA sets to be 7 GB/s. The SLA value is used as a a reference, it has +not been defined by OPNFV. + +TC070 +----- +The amount of packets per second (PPS) and round trip times (RTT) between 2 VMs +on different blades are measured when increasing the amount of UDP flows sent +between the VMs using pktgen as packet generator tool. + +Round trip times and packet throughput between VMs can typically be affected by +the amount of flows set up and result in higher RTT and less PPS throughput. + +The network latency is measured by ping, and the results of three test runs look +similar with each other, and Within these test runs, the maximum RTT can reach +95 ms and the average RTT is usually approx. 36 ms. The network latency tested +on Sep. 14 shows that it has a peak latency of 155 ms. But on the whole, the +average RTTs of the four runs keep flat. + +Memory utilization is measured by free, which can display amount of free and +used memory in the system. The largest amount of used memory is 270 MiB on Sep +13, which also has the smallest minimum memory utilization. Besides, the rest +three test runs have the similar used memory with an average memory usage of +264 MiB. On the other hand, the free memory of the four runs have the same +smallest minimum value, that is about 223 MiB, and the maximum free memory of +three runs have the similar result, that is 226 MiB, except that on Sep. 13th, +whose maximum free memory is 273 MiB. On the whole, all the test runs have +similar average free memory. + +Network throughput and packet loss can be measured by pktgen, which is a tool +in the network for generating traffic loads for network experiments. The mean +network throughput of the four test runs seem quite different, ranging from +119.85 kpps to 128.02 kpps. The average number of flows in these tests is +240000, and each run has a minimum number of flows of 2 and a maximum number +of flows of 1.001 Mil. At the same time, the corresponding packet throughput +differ between 38k and 243k with an average packet throughput of approx. 134k. +On the whole, the PPS results seem consistent. Within each test run of the four +runs, when number of flows becomes larger, the packet throughput seems not +larger in the meantime. + +TC071 +----- +The amount of packets per second (PPS) and round trip times (RTT) between 2 VMs +on different blades are measured when increasing the amount of UDP flows sent +between the VMs using pktgen as packet generator tool. + +Round trip times and packet throughput between VMs can typically be affected by +the amount of flows set up and result in higher RTT and less PPS throughput. + +The network latency is measured by ping, and the results of the four test runs +look similar with each other. Within each test run, the maximum RTT can reach +79 ms and the average RTT is usually approx. 35 ms. On the whole, the average +RTTs of the four runs keep flat. + +Cache utilization is measured by cachestat, which can display size of cache and +buffer in the system. Cache utilization statistics are collected during UDP +flows sent between the VMs using pktgen as packet generator tool.The largest +cache size is 214 MiB in the four runs, and the smallest cache size is 100 MiB. +On the whole, the average cache size of the four runs is approx. 210 MiB. +Meanwhile, the tread of the buffer size looks similar with each other. On the +other hand, the mean buffer size of the four runs keep flat, since they have a +minimum value of approx. 7 MiB and a maximum value of 8 MiB, with an average +value of about 8 MiB. + +Packet throughput can be measured by pktgen, which is a tool in the network for +generating traffic loads for network experiments. The mean packet throughput of +the four test runs seem quite different, ranging from 113.8 kpps to 124.8 kpps. +The average number of flows in these tests is 240k, and each run has a minimum +number of flows of 2 and a maximum number of flows of 1.001 Mil. At the same +time, the corresponding packet throughput differ between 47.6k and 243.1k with +an average packet throughput between 113.8k and 160.1k. Within each test run of +the four runs, when number of flows becomes larger, the packet throughput seems +not larger in the meantime. + +TC072 +----- +The amount of packets per second (PPS) and round trip times (RTT) between 2 VMs +on different blades are measured when increasing the amount of UDP flows sent +between the VMs using pktgen as packet generator tool. + +Round trip times and packet throughput between VMs can typically be affected by +the amount of flows set up and result in higher RTT and less PPS throughput. + +The RTT results are similar throughout the different test dates and runs +between 0 ms and 79 ms with an average leatency of approx. 35 ms. The PPS +results are not as consistent as the RTT results, for the mean packet +throughput of the four runs differ from 113.8 kpps to 124.8 kpps. + +Network utilization is measured by sar, that is system activity reporter, which +can display the average statistics for the time since the system was started. +Network utilization statistics are collected during UDP flows sent between the +VMs using pktgen as packet generator tool. The largest total number of packets +transmitted per second look similar on the first three runs with a minimum +number of 10 pps and a maximum number of 97 kpps, except the one on Sep. 15th, +in which the number of packets transmitted per second is 10 pps. Meanwhile, the +largest total number of packets received per second differs from each other, +in which the smallest number of packets received per second is 1 pps and the +largest of that is 276 kpps. + +In some test runs when running with less than approx. 90000 flows the PPS +throughput is normally flatter compared to when running with more flows, after +which the PPS throughput decreases. For the other test runs there is however no +significant change to the PPS throughput when the number of flows are +increased. In some test runs the PPS is also greater with 1000000 flows +compared to other test runs where the PPS result is less with only 2 flows. + +There are lost packets reported in most of the test runs. There is no observed +correlation between the amount of flows and the amount of lost packets. +The lost amount of packets normally differs a lot per test run. + +Detailed test results +--------------------- +The scenario was run on Intel POD5_ with: +Joid +OpenStack Mitaka +OpenVirtualSwitch 2.5.90 +OpenDayLight Beryllium + +Rationale for decisions +----------------------- +Pass + +Conclusions and recommendations +------------------------------- +Tests were successfully executed and metrics collected. +No SLA was verified. To be decided on in next release of OPNFV. diff --git a/docs/release/results/os-odl_l2-bgpvpn-ha.rst b/docs/release/results/os-odl_l2-bgpvpn-ha.rst new file mode 100644 index 000000000..2bd6dc35d --- /dev/null +++ b/docs/release/results/os-odl_l2-bgpvpn-ha.rst @@ -0,0 +1,53 @@ +.. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International +.. License. +.. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 + + +==================================== +Test Results for os-odl_l2-bgpvpn-ha +==================================== + +.. toctree:: + :maxdepth: 2 + + +fuel +==== + +.. _Grafana: http://testresults.opnfv.org/grafana/dashboard/db/yardstick-main +.. _POD2: https://wiki.opnfv.org/pharos?&#community_test_labs + +Overview of test results +------------------------ + +See Grafana_ for viewing test result metrics for each respective test case. It +is possible to chose which specific scenarios to look at, and then to zoom in +on the details of each run test scenario as well. + +All of the test case results below are based on 4 scenario test runs, each run +on the Ericsson POD2_ between September 7 and 11 in 2016. + +TC043 +----- +The round-trip-time (RTT) between 2 nodes is measured using +ping. Most test run measurements result on average between 0.21 and 0.28 ms. +A few runs start with a 0.32 - 0.35 ms RTT spike (This could be because of +normal ARP handling). To be able to draw conclusions more runs should be made. +SLA set to 10 ms. The SLA value is used as a reference, it has not been defined +by OPNFV. + +Detailed test results +--------------------- +The scenario was run on Ericsson POD2_ with: +Fuel 9.0 +OpenStack Mitaka +OpenVirtualSwitch 2.5.90 +OpenDayLight Beryllium + +Rationale for decisions +----------------------- +Pass + +Tests were successfully executed and metrics collected. +No SLA was verified. To be decided on in next release of OPNFV. + diff --git a/docs/release/results/os-odl_l2-nofeature-ha.rst b/docs/release/results/os-odl_l2-nofeature-ha.rst new file mode 100644 index 000000000..ac0c5bb59 --- /dev/null +++ b/docs/release/results/os-odl_l2-nofeature-ha.rst @@ -0,0 +1,743 @@ +.. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International +.. License. +.. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 + + +======================================= +Test Results for os-odl_l2-nofeature-ha +======================================= + +.. toctree:: + :maxdepth: 2 + + +apex +==== + +.. _Grafana: http://testresults.opnfv.org/grafana/dashboard/db/yardstick-main +.. _POD1: https://wiki.opnfv.org/pharos?&#community_test_labs + +Overview of test results +------------------------ + +See Grafana_ for viewing test result metrics for each respective test case. It +is possible to chose which specific scenarios to look at, and then to zoom in +on the details of each run test scenario as well. + +All of the test case results below are based on 4 scenario test runs, each run +on the LF POD1_ between September 14 and 17 in 2016. + +TC002 +----- +The round-trip-time (RTT) between 2 VMs on different blades is measured using +ping. Most test run measurements result on average between 0.49 ms and 0.60 ms. +Only one test run has reached greatest RTT spike of 0.93 ms. Meanwhile, the +smallest network latency is 0.33 ms, which is obtained on Sep. 14th. +SLA set to be 10 ms. The SLA value is used as a reference, it has not been +defined by OPNFV. + +TC005 +----- +The IO read bandwidth actually refers to the storage throughput, which is +measured by fio and the greatest IO read bandwidth of the four runs is 416 +MB/s. The IO read bandwidth of all four runs looks similar, with an average +between 128 and 131 MB/s. One of the runs has a minimum BW of 497 KB/s. The SLA +of read bandwidth sets to be 400 MB/s, which is used as a reference, and it has +not been defined by OPNFV. + +The results of storage IOPS for the four runs look similar with each other. The +IO read times per second of the four test runs have an average value at 1k per +second, and meanwhile, the minimum result is only 45 times per second. + +TC010 +----- +The tool we use to measure memory read latency is lmbench, which is a series of +micro benchmarks intended to measure basic operating system and hardware system +metrics. The memory read latency of the four runs is between 1.0859 ns and +1.0869 ns on average. The variations within each test run are quite different, +some vary from a large range and others have a small change. For example, the +largest change is on September 14th, the memory read latency of which is ranging +from 1.091 ns to 1.086 ns. However. +The SLA sets to be 30 ns. The SLA value is used as a reference, it has not been +defined by OPNFV. + +TC011 +----- +Packet delay variation between 2 VMs on different blades is measured using +Iperf3. On the first two test runs the reported packet delay variation varies between +0.0037 and 0.0740 ms, with an average delay variation between 0.0096 ms and 0.0321. +On the second date the delay variation varies between 0.0063 and 0.0096 ms, with +an average delay variation of 0.0124 - 0.0141 ms. + +TC012 +----- +Lmbench is also used to measure the memory read and write bandwidth, in which +we use bw_mem to obtain the results. Among the four test runs, the trend of +three memory bandwidth almost look similar, which all have a narrow range, and +the average result is 19.88 GB/s. Here SLA set to be 15 GB/s. The SLA value is +used as a reference, it has not been defined by OPNFV. + +TC014 +----- +The Unixbench is used to evaluate the IaaS processing speed with regards to +score of single cpu running and parallel running. It can be seen from the +dashboard that the processing test results vary from scores 3754k to 3831k, and +there is only one result one date. No SLA set. + +TC037 +----- +The amount of packets per second (PPS) and round trip times (RTT) between 2 VMs +on different blades are measured when increasing the amount of UDP flows sent +between the VMs using pktgen as packet generator tool. + +Round trip times and packet throughput between VMs can typically be affected by +the amount of flows set up and result in higher RTT and less PPS throughput. + +The mean packet throughput of the four test runs is between 307.3 kpps and +447.1 kpps, of which the result of the third run is the highest. The RTT +results of all the test runs keep flat at approx. 15 ms. It is obvious that the +PPS results are not as consistent as the RTT results. + +The No. flows of the four test runs are 240 k on average and the PPS results +look a little waved since the largest packet throughput is 418.1 kpps and the +minimum throughput is 326.5 kpps respectively. + +There are no errors of packets received in the four runs, but there are still +lost packets in all the test runs. The RTT values obtained by ping of the four +runs have the similar average vaue, that is approx. 15 ms. + +CPU load is measured by mpstat, and CPU load of the four test runs seem a +little similar, since the minimum value and the peak of CPU load is between 0 +percent and nine percent respectively. And the best result is obtained on Sep. +1, with an CPU load of nine percent. But on the whole, the CPU load is very +poor, since the average value is quite small. + +TC069 +----- +With the block size changing from 1 kb to 512 kb, the memory write bandwidth +tends to become larger first and then smaller within every run test, which +rangs from 28.2 GB/s to 29.5 GB/s and then to 29.2 GB/s on average. Since the +test id is one, it is that only the INT memory write bandwidth is tested. On +the whole, when the block size is 2 kb or 16 kb, the memory write bandwidth +look similar with a minimal BW of 25.8 GB/s and peak value of 28.3 GB/s. And +then with the block size becoming larger, the memory write bandwidth tends to +decrease. SLA sets to be 7 GB/s. The SLA value is used as a reference, it has +not been defined by OPNFV. + +TC070 +----- +The amount of packets per second (PPS) and round trip times (RTT) between 2 VMs +on different blades are measured when increasing the amount of UDP flows sent +between the VMs using pktgen as packet generator tool. + +Round trip times and packet throughput between VMs can typically be affected by +the amount of flows set up and result in higher RTT and less PPS throughput. + +The network latency is measured by ping, and the results of the four test runs +look similar with each other, and within these test runs, the maximum RTT can +reach 39 ms and the average RTT is usually approx. 15 ms. The network latency +tested on Sep. 1 and Sep. 8 have a peak latency of 39 ms. But on the whole, +the average RTTs of the five runs keep flat and the network latency is +relatively short. + +Memory utilization is measured by free, which can display amount of free and +used memory in the system. The largest amount of used memory is 267 MiB for the +four runs. In general, the four test runs have very large memory utilization, +which can reach 257 MiB on average. On the other hand, for the mean free memory, +the four test runs have the similar trend with that of the mean used memory. +In general, the mean free memory change from 233 MiB to 241 MiB. + +Packet throughput and packet loss can be measured by pktgen, which is a tool +in the network for generating traffic loads for network experiments. The mean +packet throughput of the four test runs seem quite different, ranging from +305.3 kpps to 447.1 kpps. The average number of flows in these tests is +240000, and each run has a minimum number of flows of 2 and a maximum number +of flows of 1.001 Mil. At the same time, the corresponding average packet +throughput is between 354.4 kpps and 381.8 kpps. In summary, the PPS results +seem consistent. Within each test run of the four runs, when number of flows +becomes larger, the packet throughput seems not larger at the same time. + +TC071 +----- +The amount of packets per second (PPS) and round trip times (RTT) between 2 VMs +on different blades are measured when increasing the amount of UDP flows sent +between the VMs using pktgen as packet generator tool. + +Round trip times and packet throughput between VMs can typically be affected by +the amount of flows set up and result in higher RTT and less PPS throughput. + +The network latency is measured by ping, and the results of the four test runs +look similar with each other. Within each test run, the maximum RTT is only 42 +ms and the average RTT is usually approx. 15 ms. On the whole, the average +RTTs of the four runs keep stable and the network latency is relatively small. + +Cache utilization is measured by cachestat, which can display size of cache and +buffer in the system. Cache utilization statistics are collected during UDP +flows sent between the VMs using pktgen as packet generator tool. The largest +cache size is 212 MiB, which is same for the four runs, and the smallest cache +size is 75 MiB. On the whole, the average cache size of the four runs look the +same and is between 197 MiB and 211 MiB. Meanwhile, the tread of the buffer +size keep flat, since they have a minimum value of 7 MiB and a maximum value of +8 MiB, with an average value of about 7.9 MiB. + +Packet throughput can be measured by pktgen, which is a tool in the network for +generating traffic loads for network experiments. The mean packet throughput of +the four test runs differ from 354.4 kpps to 381.8 kpps. The average number of +flows in these tests is 240k, and each run has a minimum number of flows of 2 +and a maximum number of flows of 1.001 Mil. At the same time, the corresponding +packet throughput differ between 305.3 kpps to 447.1 kpps. Within each test run +of the four runs, when number of flows becomes larger, the packet throughput +seems not larger in the meantime. + +TC072 +----- +The amount of packets per second (PPS) and round trip times (RTT) between 2 VMs +on different blades are measured when increasing the amount of UDP flows sent +between the VMs using pktgen as packet generator tool. + +Round trip times and packet throughput between VMs can typically be affected by +the amount of flows set up and result in higher RTT and less PPS throughput. + +The RTT results are similar throughout the different test dates and runs +between 0 ms and 42 ms with an average leatency of less than 15 ms. The PPS +results are not as consistent as the RTT results, for the mean packet +throughput of the four runs differ from 354.4 kpps to 381.8 kpps. + +Network utilization is measured by sar, that is system activity reporter, which +can display the average statistics for the time since the system was started. +Network utilization statistics are collected during UDP flows sent between the +VMs using pktgen as packet generator tool. The largest total number of packets +transmitted per second look similar for three test runs, whose values change a +lot from 10 pps to 501 kpps. While results of the rest test run seem the same +and keep stable with the average number of packets transmitted per second of 10 +pps. However, the total number of packets received per second of the four runs +look similar, which have a large wide range of 2 pps to 815 kpps. + +In some test runs when running with less than approx. 251000 flows the PPS +throughput is normally flatter compared to when running with more flows, after +which the PPS throughput decreases. For the other test runs there is however no +significant change to the PPS throughput when the number of flows are +increased. In some test runs the PPS is also greater with 251000 flows +compared to other test runs where the PPS result is less with only 2 flows. + +There are lost packets reported in most of the test runs. There is no observed +correlation between the amount of flows and the amount of lost packets. +The lost amount of packets normally differs a lot per test run. + +Detailed test results +--------------------- +The scenario was run on LF POD1_ with: +Apex +OpenStack Mitaka +OpenVirtualSwitch 2.5.90 +OpenDayLight Beryllium + +Rationale for decisions +----------------------- +Pass + +Conclusions and recommendations +------------------------------- +Tests were successfully executed and metrics collected. +No SLA was verified. To be decided on in next release of OPNFV. + + + +fuel +==== + +.. _Grafana: http://testresults.opnfv.org/grafana/dashboard/db/yardstick-main +.. _POD2: https://wiki.opnfv.org/pharos?&#community_test_labs + +Overview of test results +------------------------ + +See Grafana_ for viewing test result metrics for each respective test case. It +is possible to chose which specific scenarios to look at, and then to zoom in +on the details of each run test scenario as well. + +All of the test case results below are based on 4 scenario test runs, each run +on the Ericsson POD2_ or LF POD2_ between August 25 and 29 in 2016. + +TC002 +----- +The round-trip-time (RTT) between 2 VMs on different blades is measured using +ping. Most test run measurements result on average between 0.5 and 0.6 ms. +A few runs start with a 1 - 1.5 ms RTT spike (This could be because of normal ARP +handling). One test run has a greater RTT spike of 1.9 ms, which is the same +one with the 0.7 ms average. The other runs have no similar spike at all. +To be able to draw conclusions more runs should be made. +SLA set to 10 ms. The SLA value is used as a reference, it has not +been defined by OPNFV. + +TC005 +----- +The IO read bandwidth looks similar between different dates, with an +average between approx. 170 and 200 MB/s. Within each test run the results +vary, with a minimum 2 MB/s and maximum 838 MB/s on the totality. Most runs +have a minimum BW of 3 MB/s (two runs at 2 MB/s). The maximum BW varies more in +absolute numbers between the dates, between 617 and 838 MB/s. +SLA set to 400 MB/s. The SLA value is used as a reference, it has not been +defined by OPNFV. + +TC010 +----- +The measurements for memory latency are similar between test dates and result +in approx. 1.2 ns. The variations within each test run are similar, between +1.215 and 1.219 ns. One exception is February 16, where the average is 1.222 +and varies between 1.22 and 1.28 ns. +SLA set to 30 ns. The SLA value is used as a reference, it has not been defined +by OPNFV. + +TC011 +----- +Packet delay variation between 2 VMs on different blades is measured using +Iperf3. On the first date the reported packet delay variation varies between +0.0025 and 0.011 ms, with an average delay variation of 0.0067 ms. +On the second date the delay variation varies between 0.002 and 0.006 ms, with +an average delay variation of 0.004 ms. + +TC012 +----- +Between test dates, the average measurements for memory bandwidth vary between +17.4 and 17.9 GB/s. Within each test run the results vary more, with a minimal +BW of 16.4 GB/s and maximum of 18.2 GB/s on the totality. +SLA set to 15 GB/s. The SLA value is used as a reference, it has not been +defined by OPNFV. + +TC014 +----- +The Unixbench processor test run results vary between scores 3080 and 3240, +one result each date. The average score on the total is 3150. +No SLA set. + +TC037 +----- +The amount of packets per second (PPS) and round trip times (RTT) between 2 VMs +on different blades are measured when increasing the amount of UDP flows sent +between the VMs using pktgen as packet generator tool. + +Round trip times and packet throughput between VMs can typically be affected by +the amount of flows set up and result in higher RTT and less PPS throughput. + +The RTT results are similar throughout the different test dates and runs at +approx. 15 ms. Some test runs show an increase with many flows, in the range +towards 16 to 17 ms. One exception standing out is Feb. 15 where the average +RTT is stable at approx. 13 ms. The PPS results are not as consistent as the +RTT results. +In some test runs when running with less than approx. 10000 flows the PPS +throughput is normally flatter compared to when running with more flows, after +which the PPS throughput decreases. Around 20 percent decrease in the worst +case. For the other test runs there is however no significant change to the PPS +throughput when the number of flows are increased. In some test runs the PPS +is also greater with 1000000 flows compared to other test runs where the PPS +result is less with only 2 flows. + +The average PPS throughput in the different runs varies between 414000 and +452000 PPS. The total amount of packets in each test run is approx. 7500000 to +8200000 packets. One test run Feb. 15 sticks out with a PPS average of +558000 and approx. 1100000 packets in total (same as the on mentioned earlier +for RTT results). + +There are lost packets reported in most of the test runs. There is no observed +correlation between the amount of flows and the amount of lost packets. +The lost amount of packets normally range between 100 and 1000 per test run, +but there are spikes in the range of 10000 lost packets as well, and even +more in a rare cases. + +CPU utilization statistics are collected during UDP flows sent between the VMs +using pktgen as packet generator tool. The average measurements for CPU +utilization ratio vary between 1% to 2%. The peak of CPU utilization ratio +appears around 7%. + +TC069 +----- +Between test dates, the average measurements for memory bandwidth vary between +15.5 and 25.4 GB/s. Within each test run the results vary more, with a minimal +BW of 9.7 GB/s and maximum of 29.5 GB/s on the totality. +SLA set to 6 GB/s. The SLA value is used as a reference, it has not been +defined by OPNFV. + +TC070 +----- +The amount of packets per second (PPS) and round trip times (RTT) between 2 VMs +on different blades are measured when increasing the amount of UDP flows sent +between the VMs using pktgen as packet generator tool. + +Round trip times and packet throughput between VMs can typically be affected by +the amount of flows set up and result in higher RTT and less PPS throughput. + +The RTT results are similar throughout the different test dates and runs at +approx. 15 ms. Some test runs show an increase with many flows, in the range +towards 16 to 17 ms. One exception standing out is Feb. 15 where the average +RTT is stable at approx. 13 ms. The PPS results are not as consistent as the +RTT results. +In some test runs when running with less than approx. 10000 flows the PPS +throughput is normally flatter compared to when running with more flows, after +which the PPS throughput decreases. Around 20 percent decrease in the worst +case. For the other test runs there is however no significant change to the PPS +throughput when the number of flows are increased. In some test runs the PPS +is also greater with 1000000 flows compared to other test runs where the PPS +result is less with only 2 flows. + +The average PPS throughput in the different runs varies between 414000 and +452000 PPS. The total amount of packets in each test run is approx. 7500000 to +8200000 packets. One test run Feb. 15 sticks out with a PPS average of +558000 and approx. 1100000 packets in total (same as the on mentioned earlier +for RTT results). + +There are lost packets reported in most of the test runs. There is no observed +correlation between the amount of flows and the amount of lost packets. +The lost amount of packets normally range between 100 and 1000 per test run, +but there are spikes in the range of 10000 lost packets as well, and even +more in a rare cases. + +Memory utilization statistics are collected during UDP flows sent between the +VMs using pktgen as packet generator tool. The average measurements for memory +utilization vary between 225MB to 246MB. The peak of memory utilization appears +around 340MB. + +TC071 +----- +The amount of packets per second (PPS) and round trip times (RTT) between 2 VMs +on different blades are measured when increasing the amount of UDP flows sent +between the VMs using pktgen as packet generator tool. + +Round trip times and packet throughput between VMs can typically be affected by +the amount of flows set up and result in higher RTT and less PPS throughput. + +The RTT results are similar throughout the different test dates and runs at +approx. 15 ms. Some test runs show an increase with many flows, in the range +towards 16 to 17 ms. One exception standing out is Feb. 15 where the average +RTT is stable at approx. 13 ms. The PPS results are not as consistent as the +RTT results. +In some test runs when running with less than approx. 10000 flows the PPS +throughput is normally flatter compared to when running with more flows, after +which the PPS throughput decreases. Around 20 percent decrease in the worst +case. For the other test runs there is however no significant change to the PPS +throughput when the number of flows are increased. In some test runs the PPS +is also greater with 1000000 flows compared to other test runs where the PPS +result is less with only 2 flows. + +The average PPS throughput in the different runs varies between 414000 and +452000 PPS. The total amount of packets in each test run is approx. 7500000 to +8200000 packets. One test run Feb. 15 sticks out with a PPS average of +558000 and approx. 1100000 packets in total (same as the on mentioned earlier +for RTT results). + +There are lost packets reported in most of the test runs. There is no observed +correlation between the amount of flows and the amount of lost packets. +The lost amount of packets normally range between 100 and 1000 per test run, +but there are spikes in the range of 10000 lost packets as well, and even +more in a rare cases. + +Cache utilization statistics are collected during UDP flows sent between the +VMs using pktgen as packet generator tool. The average measurements for cache +utilization vary between 205MB to 212MB. + +TC072 +----- +The amount of packets per second (PPS) and round trip times (RTT) between 2 VMs +on different blades are measured when increasing the amount of UDP flows sent +between the VMs using pktgen as packet generator tool. + +Round trip times and packet throughput between VMs can typically be affected by +the amount of flows set up and result in higher RTT and less PPS throughput. + +The RTT results are similar throughout the different test dates and runs at +approx. 15 ms. Some test runs show an increase with many flows, in the range +towards 16 to 17 ms. One exception standing out is Feb. 15 where the average +RTT is stable at approx. 13 ms. The PPS results are not as consistent as the +RTT results. +In some test runs when running with less than approx. 10000 flows the PPS +throughput is normally flatter compared to when running with more flows, after +which the PPS throughput decreases. Around 20 percent decrease in the worst +case. For the other test runs there is however no significant change to the PPS +throughput when the number of flows are increased. In some test runs the PPS +is also greater with 1000000 flows compared to other test runs where the PPS +result is less with only 2 flows. + +The average PPS throughput in the different runs varies between 414000 and +452000 PPS. The total amount of packets in each test run is approx. 7500000 to +8200000 packets. One test run Feb. 15 sticks out with a PPS average of +558000 and approx. 1100000 packets in total (same as the on mentioned earlier +for RTT results). + +There are lost packets reported in most of the test runs. There is no observed +correlation between the amount of flows and the amount of lost packets. +The lost amount of packets normally range between 100 and 1000 per test run, +but there are spikes in the range of 10000 lost packets as well, and even +more in a rare cases. + +Network utilization statistics are collected during UDP flows sent between the +VMs using pktgen as packet generator tool. Total number of packets received per +second was average on 200 kpps and total number of packets transmitted per +second was average on 600 kpps. + +Detailed test results +--------------------- +The scenario was run on Ericsson POD2_ and LF POD2_ with: +Fuel 9.0 +OpenStack Mitaka +OpenVirtualSwitch 2.5.90 +OpenDayLight Beryllium + +Rationale for decisions +----------------------- +Pass + +Tests were successfully executed and metrics collected. +No SLA was verified. To be decided on in next release of OPNFV. + +Conclusions and recommendations +------------------------------- +The pktgen test configuration has a relatively large base effect on RTT in +TC037 compared to TC002, where there is no background load at all. Approx. +15 ms compared to approx. 0.5 ms, which is more than a 3000 percentage +difference in RTT results. +Especially RTT and throughput come out with better results than for instance +the *fuel-os-nosdn-nofeature-ha* scenario does. The reason for this should +probably be further analyzed and understood. Also of interest could be +to make further analyzes to find patterns and reasons for lost traffic. +Also of interest could be to see if there are continuous variations where +some test cases stand out with better or worse results than the general test +case. + + + +Joid +===== + +.. _Grafana: http://testresults.opnfv.org/grafana/dashboard/db/yardstick-main +.. _POD6: https://wiki.opnfv.org/pharos?&#community_test_labs + +Overview of test results +------------------------ + +See Grafana_ for viewing test result metrics for each respective test case. It +is possible to chose which specific scenarios to look at, and then to zoom in +on the details of each run test scenario as well. + +All of the test case results below are based on 4 scenario test runs, each run +on the Intel POD6_ between September 1 and 8 in 2016. + +TC002 +----- +The round-trip-time (RTT) between 2 VMs on different blades is measured using +ping. Most test run measurements result on average between 1.01 ms and 1.88 ms. +Only one test run has reached greatest RTT spike of 1.88 ms. Meanwhile, the +smallest network latency is 1.01 ms, which is obtained on Sep. 1st. In general, +the average of network latency of the four test runs are between 1.29 ms and +1.34 ms. SLA set to be 10 ms. The SLA value is used as a reference, it has not +been defined by OPNFV. + +TC005 +----- +The IO read bandwidth actually refers to the storage throughput, which is +measured by fio and the greatest IO read bandwidth of the four runs is 183.65 +MB/s. The IO read bandwidth of the three runs looks similar, with an average +between 62.9 and 64.3 MB/s, except one on Sep. 1, for its maximum storage +throughput is only 159.1 MB/s. One of the runs has a minimum BW of 685 KB/s and +other has a maximum BW of 183.6 MB/s. The SLA of read bandwidth sets to be +400 MB/s, which is used as a reference, and it has not been defined by OPNFV. + +The results of storage IOPS for the four runs look similar with each other. The +IO read times per second of the four test runs have an average value between +1.41k per second and 1.64k per second, and meanwhile, the minimum result is +only 55 times per second. + +TC010 +----- +The tool we use to measure memory read latency is lmbench, which is a series of +micro benchmarks intended to measure basic operating system and hardware system +metrics. The memory read latency of the four runs is between 1.152 ns and 1.179 +ns on average. The variations within each test run are quite different, some +vary from a large range and others have a small change. For example, the +largest change is on September 8, the memory read latency of which is ranging +from 1.120 ns to 1.221 ns. However, the results on September 7 change very +little. The SLA sets to be 30 ns. The SLA value is used as a reference, it has +not been defined by OPNFV. + +TC011 +----- +Iperf3 is a tool for evaluating the packet delay variation between 2 VMs on +different blades. The reported packet delay variations of the four test runs +differ from each other. In general, the packet delay of the first two runs look +similar, for they both stay stable within each run. And the mean packet delay +of them are 0.0087 ms and 0.0127 ms respectively. Of the four runs, the fourth +has the worst result, because the packet delay reaches 0.0187 ms. The SLA value +sets to be 10 ms. The SLA value is used as a reference, it has not been defined +by OPNFV. + +TC012 +----- +Lmbench is also used to measure the memory read and write bandwidth, in which +we use bw_mem to obtain the results. Among the four test runs, the trend of +three memory bandwidth almost look similar, which all have a narrow range, and +the average result is 11.78 GB/s. Here SLA set to be 15 GB/s. The SLA value is +used as a reference, it has not been defined by OPNFV. + +TC014 +----- +The Unixbench is used to evaluate the IaaS processing speed with regards to +score of single cpu running and parallel running. It can be seen from the +dashboard that the processing test results vary from scores 3260k to 3328k, and +there is only one result one date. No SLA set. + +TC037 +----- +The amount of packets per second (PPS) and round trip times (RTT) between 2 VMs +on different blades are measured when increasing the amount of UDP flows sent +between the VMs using pktgen as packet generator tool. + +Round trip times and packet throughput between VMs can typically be affected by +the amount of flows set up and result in higher RTT and less PPS throughput. + +The mean packet throughput of the four test runs is between 307.3 kpps and +447.1 kpps, of which the result of the third run is the highest. The RTT +results of all the test runs keep flat at approx. 15 ms. It is obvious that the +PPS results are not as consistent as the RTT results. + +The No. flows of the four test runs are 240 k on average and the PPS results +look a little waved since the largest packet throughput is 418.1 kpps and the +minimum throughput is 326.5 kpps respectively. + +There are no errors of packets received in the four runs, but there are still +lost packets in all the test runs. The RTT values obtained by ping of the four +runs have the similar average vaue, that is approx. 15 ms. + +CPU load is measured by mpstat, and CPU load of the four test runs seem a +little similar, since the minimum value and the peak of CPU load is between 0 +percent and nine percent respectively. And the best result is obtained on Sep. +1, with an CPU load of nine percent. But on the whole, the CPU load is very +poor, since the average value is quite small. + +TC069 +----- +With the block size changing from 1 kb to 512 kb, the memory write bandwidth +tends to become larger first and then smaller within every run test, which +rangs from 21.9 GB/s to 25.9 GB/s and then to 17.8 GB/s on average. Since the +test id is one, it is that only the INT memory write bandwidth is tested. On +the whole, when the block size is 2 kb or 16 kb, the memory write bandwidth +look similar with a minimal BW of 24.8 GB/s and peak value of 27.8 GB/s. And +then with the block size becoming larger, the memory write bandwidth tends to +decrease. SLA sets to be 7 GB/s. The SLA value is used as a reference, it has +not been defined by OPNFV. + +TC070 +----- +The amount of packets per second (PPS) and round trip times (RTT) between 2 VMs +on different blades are measured when increasing the amount of UDP flows sent +between the VMs using pktgen as packet generator tool. + +Round trip times and packet throughput between VMs can typically be affected by +the amount of flows set up and result in higher RTT and less PPS throughput. + +The network latency is measured by ping, and the results of the four test runs +look similar with each other, and within these test runs, the maximum RTT can +reach 39 ms and the average RTT is usually approx. 15 ms. The network latency +tested on Sep. 1 and Sep. 8 have a peak latency of 39 ms. But on the whole, +the average RTTs of the five runs keep flat and the network latency is +relatively short. + +Memory utilization is measured by free, which can display amount of free and +used memory in the system. The largest amount of used memory is 267 MiB for the +four runs. In general, the four test runs have very large memory utilization, +which can reach 257 MiB on average. On the other hand, for the mean free memory, +the four test runs have the similar trend with that of the mean used memory. +In general, the mean free memory change from 233 MiB to 241 MiB. + +Packet throughput and packet loss can be measured by pktgen, which is a tool +in the network for generating traffic loads for network experiments. The mean +packet throughput of the four test runs seem quite different, ranging from +305.3 kpps to 447.1 kpps. The average number of flows in these tests is +240000, and each run has a minimum number of flows of 2 and a maximum number +of flows of 1.001 Mil. At the same time, the corresponding average packet +throughput is between 354.4 kpps and 381.8 kpps. In summary, the PPS results +seem consistent. Within each test run of the four runs, when number of flows +becomes larger, the packet throughput seems not larger at the same time. + +TC071 +----- +The amount of packets per second (PPS) and round trip times (RTT) between 2 VMs +on different blades are measured when increasing the amount of UDP flows sent +between the VMs using pktgen as packet generator tool. + +Round trip times and packet throughput between VMs can typically be affected by +the amount of flows set up and result in higher RTT and less PPS throughput. + +The network latency is measured by ping, and the results of the four test runs +look similar with each other. Within each test run, the maximum RTT is only 42 +ms and the average RTT is usually approx. 15 ms. On the whole, the average +RTTs of the four runs keep stable and the network latency is relatively small. + +Cache utilization is measured by cachestat, which can display size of cache and +buffer in the system. Cache utilization statistics are collected during UDP +flows sent between the VMs using pktgen as packet generator tool. The largest +cache size is 212 MiB, which is same for the four runs, and the smallest cache +size is 75 MiB. On the whole, the average cache size of the four runs look the +same and is between 197 MiB and 211 MiB. Meanwhile, the tread of the buffer +size keep flat, since they have a minimum value of 7 MiB and a maximum value of +8 MiB, with an average value of about 7.9 MiB. + +Packet throughput can be measured by pktgen, which is a tool in the network for +generating traffic loads for network experiments. The mean packet throughput of +the four test runs differ from 354.4 kpps to 381.8 kpps. The average number of +flows in these tests is 240k, and each run has a minimum number of flows of 2 +and a maximum number of flows of 1.001 Mil. At the same time, the corresponding +packet throughput differ between 305.3 kpps to 447.1 kpps. Within each test run +of the four runs, when number of flows becomes larger, the packet throughput +seems not larger in the meantime. + +TC072 +----- +The amount of packets per second (PPS) and round trip times (RTT) between 2 VMs +on different blades are measured when increasing the amount of UDP flows sent +between the VMs using pktgen as packet generator tool. + +Round trip times and packet throughput between VMs can typically be affected by +the amount of flows set up and result in higher RTT and less PPS throughput. + +The RTT results are similar throughout the different test dates and runs +between 0 ms and 42 ms with an average leatency of less than 15 ms. The PPS +results are not as consistent as the RTT results, for the mean packet +throughput of the four runs differ from 354.4 kpps to 381.8 kpps. + +Network utilization is measured by sar, that is system activity reporter, which +can display the average statistics for the time since the system was started. +Network utilization statistics are collected during UDP flows sent between the +VMs using pktgen as packet generator tool. The largest total number of packets +transmitted per second look similar for three test runs, whose values change a +lot from 10 pps to 501 kpps. While results of the rest test run seem the same +and keep stable with the average number of packets transmitted per second of 10 +pps. However, the total number of packets received per second of the four runs +look similar, which have a large wide range of 2 pps to 815 kpps. + +In some test runs when running with less than approx. 251000 flows the PPS +throughput is normally flatter compared to when running with more flows, after +which the PPS throughput decreases. For the other test runs there is however no +significant change to the PPS throughput when the number of flows are +increased. In some test runs the PPS is also greater with 251000 flows +compared to other test runs where the PPS result is less with only 2 flows. + +There are lost packets reported in most of the test runs. There is no observed +correlation between the amount of flows and the amount of lost packets. +The lost amount of packets normally differs a lot per test run. + +Detailed test results +--------------------- +The scenario was run on Intel POD6_ with: +Joid +OpenStack Mitaka +OpenVirtualSwitch 2.5.90 +OpenDayLight Beryllium + +Rationale for decisions +----------------------- +Pass + +Conclusions and recommendations +------------------------------- +Tests were successfully executed and metrics collected. +No SLA was verified. To be decided on in next release of OPNFV. + diff --git a/docs/release/results/os-odl_l2-sfc-ha.rst b/docs/release/results/os-odl_l2-sfc-ha.rst new file mode 100644 index 000000000..e27562cae --- /dev/null +++ b/docs/release/results/os-odl_l2-sfc-ha.rst @@ -0,0 +1,231 @@ +.. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International +.. License. +.. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 + + +================================== +Test Results for os-odl_l2-sfc-ha +================================== + +.. toctree:: + :maxdepth: 2 + + +Fuel +===== + +.. _Grafana: http://testresults.opnfv.org/grafana/dashboard/db/yardstick-main +.. _POD2: https://wiki.opnfv.org/pharos?&#community_test_labs + +Overview of test results +------------------------ + +See Grafana_ for viewing test result metrics for each respective test case. It +is possible to chose which specific scenarios to look at, and then to zoom in +on the details of each run test scenario as well. + +All of the test case results below are based on 4 scenario test runs, each run +on the LF POD2_ or Ericsson POD2_ between September 16 and 20 in 2016. + +TC002 +----- +The round-trip-time (RTT) between 2 VMs on different blades is measured using +ping. Most test run measurements result on average between 0.32 ms and 1.42 ms. +Only one test run on Sep. 20 has reached greatest RTT spike of 4.66 ms. +Meanwhile, the smallest network latency is 0.16 ms, which is obtained on Sep. +17th. To sum up, the curve of network latency has very small wave, which is +less than 5 ms. SLA sets to be 10 ms. The SLA value is used as a reference, it +has not been defined by OPNFV. + +TC005 +----- +The IO read bandwidth actually refers to the storage throughput, which is +measured by fio and the greatest IO read bandwidth of the four runs is 734 +MB/s. The IO read bandwidth of the first three runs looks similar, with an +average of less than 100 KB/s, except one on Sep. 20, whose maximum storage +throughput can reach 734 MB/s. The SLA of read bandwidth sets to be 400 MB/s, +which is used as a reference, and it has not been defined by OPNFV. + +The results of storage IOPS for the four runs look similar with each other. The +IO read times per second of the four test runs have an average value between +1.8k per second and 3.27k per second, and meanwhile, the minimum result is +only 60 times per second. + +TC010 +----- +The tool we use to measure memory read latency is lmbench, which is a series of +micro benchmarks intended to measure basic operating system and hardware system +metrics. The memory read latency of the four runs is between 1.085 ns and 1.218 +ns on average. The variations within each test run are quite small. For +Ericsson pod2, the average of memory latency is approx. 1.217 ms. While for LF +pod2, the average value is about 1.085 ms. It can be seen that the performance +of LF is better than Ericsson's. The SLA sets to be 30 ns. The SLA value is +used as a reference, it has not been defined by OPNFV. + +TC012 +----- +Lmbench is also used to measure the memory read and write bandwidth, in which +we use bw_mem to obtain the results. The four test runs all have a narrow range +of change with the average memory and write BW of 18.5 GB/s. Here SLA set to be +15 GB/s. The SLA value is used as a reference, it has not been defined by OPNFV. + +TC014 +----- +The Unixbench is used to evaluate the IaaS processing speed with regards to +score of single cpu running and parallel running. It can be seen from the +dashboard that the processing test results vary from scores 3209k to 3843k, and +there is only one result one date. No SLA set. + +TC037 +----- +The amount of packets per second (PPS) and round trip times (RTT) between 2 VMs +on different blades are measured when increasing the amount of UDP flows sent +between the VMs using pktgen as packet generator tool. + +Round trip times and packet throughput between VMs can typically be affected by +the amount of flows set up and result in higher RTT and less PPS throughput. + +The mean packet throughput of the three test runs is between 439 kpps and +582 kpps, and the test run on Sep. 17th has the lowest average value of 371 +kpps. The RTT results of all the test runs keep flat at approx. 10 ms. It is +obvious that the PPS results are not as consistent as the RTT results. + +The No. flows of the four test runs are 240 k on average and the PPS results +look a little waved, since the largest packet throughput is 680 kpps and the +minimum throughput is 319 kpps respectively. + +There are no errors of packets received in the four runs, but there are still +lost packets in all the test runs. The RTT values obtained by ping of the four +runs have the similar trend of RTT with the average value of approx. 12 ms. + +CPU load is measured by mpstat, and CPU load of the four test runs seem a +little similar, since the minimum value and the peak of CPU load is between 0 +percent and ten percent respectively. And the best result is obtained on Sep. +17th, with an CPU load of ten percent. But on the whole, the CPU load is very +poor, since the average value is quite small. + +TC069 +----- +With the block size changing from 1 kb to 512 kb, the average memory write +bandwidth tends to become larger first and then smaller within every run test +for the two pods, which rangs from 25.1 GB/s to 29.4 GB/s and then to 19.2 GB/s +on average. Since the test id is one, it is that only the INT memory write +bandwidth is tested. On the whole, with the block size becoming larger, the +memory write bandwidth tends to decrease. SLA sets to be 7 GB/s. The SLA value +is used as a reference, it has not been defined by OPNFV. + +TC070 +----- +The amount of packets per second (PPS) and round trip times (RTT) between 2 VMs +on different blades are measured when increasing the amount of UDP flows sent +between the VMs using pktgen as packet generator tool. + +Round trip times and packet throughput between VMs can typically be affected by +the amount of flows set up and result in higher RTT and less PPS throughput. + +The network latency is measured by ping, and the results of the four test runs +look similar with each other, and within these test runs, the maximum RTT can +reach 27 ms and the average RTT is usually approx. 12 ms. The network latency +tested on Sep. 27th has a peak latency of 27 ms. But on the whole, the average +RTTs of the four runs keep flat. + +Memory utilization is measured by free, which can display amount of free and +used memory in the system. The largest amount of used memory is 269 MiB for the +four runs. In general, the four test runs have very large memory utilization, +which can reach 251 MiB on average. On the other hand, for the mean free memory, +the four test runs have the similar trend with that of the mean used memory. +In general, the mean free memory change from 231 MiB to 248 MiB. + +Packet throughput and packet loss can be measured by pktgen, which is a tool +in the network for generating traffic loads for network experiments. The mean +packet throughput of the four test runs seem quite different, ranging from +371 kpps to 582 kpps. The average number of flows in these tests is +240000, and each run has a minimum number of flows of 2 and a maximum number +of flows of 1.001 Mil. At the same time, the corresponding average packet +throughput is between 319 kpps and 680 kpps. In summary, the PPS results +seem consistent. Within each test run of the four runs, when number of flows +becomes larger, the packet throughput seems not larger at the same time. + +TC071 +----- +The amount of packets per second (PPS) and round trip times (RTT) between 2 VMs +on different blades are measured when increasing the amount of UDP flows sent +between the VMs using pktgen as packet generator tool. + +Round trip times and packet throughput between VMs can typically be affected by +the amount of flows set up and result in higher RTT and less PPS throughput. + +The network latency is measured by ping, and the results of the four test runs +look similar with each other. Within each test run, the maximum RTT is only 24 +ms and the average RTT is usually approx. 12 ms. On the whole, the average +RTTs of the four runs keep stable and the network latency is relatively small. + +Cache utilization is measured by cachestat, which can display size of cache and +buffer in the system. Cache utilization statistics are collected during UDP +flows sent between the VMs using pktgen as packet generator tool. The largest +cache size is 213 MiB, and the smallest cache size is 99 MiB, which is same for +the four runs. On the whole, the average cache size of the four runs look the +same and is between 184 MiB and 205 MiB. Meanwhile, the tread of the buffer +size keep stable, since they have a minimum value of 7 MiB and a maximum value of +8 MiB. + +Packet throughput can be measured by pktgen, which is a tool in the network for +generating traffic loads for network experiments. The mean packet throughput of +the four test runs differ from 371 kpps to 582 kpps. The average number of +flows in these tests is 240k, and each run has a minimum number of flows of 2 +and a maximum number of flows of 1.001 Mil. At the same time, the corresponding +packet throughput differ between 319 kpps to 680 kpps. Within each test run +of the four runs, when number of flows becomes larger, the packet throughput +seems not larger in the meantime. + +TC072 +----- +The amount of packets per second (PPS) and round trip times (RTT) between 2 VMs +on different blades are measured when increasing the amount of UDP flows sent +between the VMs using pktgen as packet generator tool. + +Round trip times and packet throughput between VMs can typically be affected by +the amount of flows set up and result in higher RTT and less PPS throughput. + +The RTT results are similar throughout the different test dates and runs +between 0 ms and 24 ms with an average leatency of less than 13 ms. The PPS +results are not as consistent as the RTT results, for the mean packet +throughput of the four runs differ from 370 kpps to 582 kpps. + +Network utilization is measured by sar, that is system activity reporter, which +can display the average statistics for the time since the system was started. +Network utilization statistics are collected during UDP flows sent between the +VMs using pktgen as packet generator tool. The largest total number of packets +transmitted per second look similar for the four test runs, whose values change a +lot from 10 pps to 697 kpps. However, the total number of packets received per +second of three runs look similar, which have a large wide range of 2 pps to +1.497 Mpps, while the results on Sep. 18th and 20th have very small maximum +number of packets received per second of 817 kpps. + +In some test runs when running with less than approx. 251000 flows the PPS +throughput is normally flatter compared to when running with more flows, after +which the PPS throughput decreases. For the other test runs there is however no +significant change to the PPS throughput when the number of flows are +increased. In some test runs the PPS is also greater with 251000 flows +compared to other test runs where the PPS result is less with only 2 flows. + +There are lost packets reported in most of the test runs. There is no observed +correlation between the amount of flows and the amount of lost packets. +The lost amount of packets normally differs a lot per test run. + +Detailed test results +--------------------- +The scenario was run on Ericsson POD2_ and LF POD2_ with: +Fuel 9.0 +OpenStack Mitaka +OpenVirtualSwitch 2.5.90 +OpenDayLight Beryllium + +Rationale for decisions +----------------------- +Pass + +Conclusions and recommendations +------------------------------- +Tests were successfully executed and metrics collected. +No SLA was verified. To be decided on in next release of OPNFV. diff --git a/docs/release/results/os-onos-nofeature-ha.rst b/docs/release/results/os-onos-nofeature-ha.rst new file mode 100644 index 000000000..d8b3ace5f --- /dev/null +++ b/docs/release/results/os-onos-nofeature-ha.rst @@ -0,0 +1,257 @@ +.. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International +.. License. +.. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 + + +====================================== +Test Results for os-onos-nofeature-ha +====================================== + +.. toctree:: + :maxdepth: 2 + + +Joid +===== + +.. _Grafana: http://testresults.opnfv.org/grafana/dashboard/db/yardstick-main +.. _POD6: https://wiki.opnfv.org/pharos?&#community_test_labs + +Overview of test results +------------------------ + +See Grafana_ for viewing test result metrics for each respective test case. It +is possible to chose which specific scenarios to look at, and then to zoom in +on the details of each run test scenario as well. + +All of the test case results below are based on 5 scenario test runs, each run +on the Intel POD6_ between September 13 and 16 in 2016. + +TC002 +----- +The round-trip-time (RTT) between 2 VMs on different blades is measured using +ping. Most test run measurements result on average between 1.50 and 1.68 ms. +Only one test run has reached greatest RTT spike of 2.62 ms, which has +the smallest RTT of 1.00 ms. The other four runs have no similar spike at all, +the minimum and average RTTs of which are approx. 1.06 ms and 1.32 ms. SLA set +to be 10 ms. The SLA value is used as a reference, it has not been defined by +OPNFV. + +TC005 +----- +The IO read bandwidth actually refers to the storage throughput, which is +measured by fio and the greatest IO read bandwidth of the four runs is 175.4 +MB/s. The IO read bandwidth of the four runs looks similar on different four +days, with an average between 58.1 and 62.0 MB/s, except one on Sep. 14, for +its maximum storage throughput is only 133.0 MB/s. One of the runs has a +minimum BW of 497 KM/s and other has a maximum BW of 177.4 MB/s. The SLA of read +bandwidth sets to be 400 MB/s, which is used as a reference, and it has not +been defined by OPNFV. + +The results of storage IOPS for the five runs look similar with each other. The +IO read times per second of the five test runs have an average value between +1.20 K/s and 1.61 K/s, and meanwhile, the minimum result is only 41 times per +second. + +TC010 +----- +The tool we use to measure memory read latency is lmbench, which is a series of +micro benchmarks intended to measure basic operating system and hardware system +metrics. The memory read latency of the five runs is between 1.146 ns and 1.172 +ns on average. The variations within each test run are quite different, some +vary from a large range and others have a small change. For example, the +largest change is on September 13, the memory read latency of which is ranging +from 1.152 ns to 1.221 ns. However, the results on September 14 change very +little. The SLA sets to be 30 ns. The SLA value is used as a reference, it has +not been defined by OPNFV. + +TC011 +----- +Iperf3 is a tool for evaluating the packet delay variation between 2 VMs on +different blades. The reported packet delay variations of the five test runs +differ from each other. In general, the packet delay of the first two runs look +similar, for they both stay stable within each run. And the mean packet delay of +of them are 0.07714 ms and 0.07982 ms respectively. Of the five runs, the third +has the worst result, because the packet delay reaches 0.08384 ms. The trend of +therest two runs look the same, for the average packet delay are 0.07808 ms and +0.07727 ms respectively. The SLA value sets to be 10 ms. The SLA value is used +as a reference, it has not been defined by OPNFV. + +TC012 +----- +Lmbench is also used to measure the memory read and write bandwidth, in which +we use bw_mem to obtain the results. Among the five test runs, the memory +bandwidth of last three test runs almost keep stable within each run, which is +11.64, 11.71 and 11.61 GB/s on average. However, the memory read and write +bandwidth on Sep. 13 has a large range, for it ranges from 6.68 GB/s to 11.73 +GB/s. Here SLA set to be 15 GB/s. The SLA value is used as a reference, it has +not been defined by OPNFV. + +TC014 +----- +The Unixbench is used to evaluate the IaaS processing speed with regards to +score of single cpu running and parallel running. It can be seen from the +dashboard that the processing test results vary from scores 3208 to 3314, and +there is only one result one date. No SLA set. + +TC037 +----- +The amount of packets per second (PPS) and round trip times (RTT) between 2 VMs +on different blades are measured when increasing the amount of UDP flows sent +between the VMs using pktgen as packet generator tool. + +Round trip times and packet throughput between VMs can typically be affected by +the amount of flows set up and result in higher RTT and less PPS throughput. + +The mean packet throughput of the five test runs is between 259.6 kpps and +318.4 kpps, of which the result of the second run is the highest. The RTT +results of all the test runs keep flat at approx. 20 ms. It is obvious that the +PPS results are not as consistent as the RTT results. + +The No. flows of the five test runs are 240 k on average and the PPS results +look a little waved since the largest packet throughput is 398.9 kpps and the +minimum throughput is 250.6 kpps respectively. + +There are no errors of packets received in the five runs, but there are still +lost packets in all the test runs. The RTT values obtained by ping of the five +runs have the similar average vaue, that is between 17 ms and 22 ms, of which +the worest RTT is 53 ms on Sep. 14th. + +CPU load is measured by mpstat, and CPU load of the four test runs seem a +little similar, since the minimum value and the peak of CPU load is between 0 +percent and 10 percent respectively. And the best result is obtained on Sep. +13rd, with an CPU load of 10 percent. + +TC069 +----- +With the block size changing from 1 kb to 512 kb, the memory write bandwidth +tends to become larger first and then smaller within every run test, which +rangs from 21.6 GB/s to 26.8 GB/s and then to 18.4 GB/s on average. Since the +test id is one, it is that only the INT memory write bandwidth is tested. On +the whole, when the block size is 8 kb and 16 kb, the memory write bandwidth +look similar with a minimal BW of 23.0 GB/s and peak value of 28.6 GB/s. And +then with the block size becoming larger, the memory write bandwidth tends to +decrease. SLA sets to be 7 GB/s. The SLA value is used as a a reference, it has +not been defined by OPNFV. + +TC070 +----- +The amount of packets per second (PPS) and round trip times (RTT) between 2 VMs +on different blades are measured when increasing the amount of UDP flows sent +between the VMs using pktgen as packet generator tool. + +Round trip times and packet throughput between VMs can typically be affected by +the amount of flows set up and result in higher RTT and less PPS throughput. + +The network latency is measured by ping, and the results of the five test runs +look similar with each other, and within these test runs, the maximum RTT can +reach 53 ms and the average RTT is usually approx. 18 ms. The network latency +tested on Sep. 14 shows that it has a peak latency of 53 ms. But on the whole, +the average RTTs of the five runs keep flat and the network latency is +relatively short. + +Memory utilization is measured by free, which can display amount of free and +used memory in the system. The largest amount of used memory is 272 MiB on Sep +14. In general, the mean used memory of the five test runs have the similar +trend and the minimum memory used size is approx. 150 MiB, and the average +used memory size is about 250 MiB. On the other hand, for the mean free memory, +the five test runs have the similar trend, whose mean free memory change from +218 MiB to 342 MiB, with an average value of approx. 38 MiB. + +Packet throughput and packet loss can be measured by pktgen, which is a tool +in the network for generating traffic loads for network experiments. The mean +packet throughput of the five test runs seem quite different, ranging from +285.29 kpps to 297.76 kpps. The average number of flows in these tests is +240000, and each run has a minimum number of flows of 2 and a maximum number +of flows of 1.001 Mil. At the same time, the corresponding packet throughput +differ between 250.6k and 398.9k with an average packet throughput between +277.2 K and 318.4 K. In summary, the PPS results seem consistent. Within each +test run of the five runs, when number of flows becomes larger, the packet +throughput seems not larger at the same time. + +TC071 +----- +The amount of packets per second (PPS) and round trip times (RTT) between 2 VMs +on different blades are measured when increasing the amount of UDP flows sent +between the VMs using pktgen as packet generator tool. + +Round trip times and packet throughput between VMs can typically be affected by +the amount of flows set up and result in higher RTT and less PPS throughput. + +The network latency is measured by ping, and the results of the five test runs +look similar with each other. Within each test run, the maximum RTT is only 49 +ms and the average RTT is usually approx. 20 ms. On the whole, the average +RTTs of the five runs keep stable and the network latency is relatively short. + +Cache utilization is measured by cachestat, which can display size of cache and +buffer in the system. Cache utilization statistics are collected during UDP +flows sent between the VMs using pktgen as packet generator tool.The largest +cache size is 215 MiB in the four runs, and the smallest cache size is 95 MiB. +On the whole, the average cache size of the five runs change a little and is +about 200 MiB, except the one on Sep. 14th, the mean cache size is very small, +which keeps 102 MiB. Meanwhile, the tread of the buffer size keep flat, since +they have a minimum value of 7 MiB and a maximum value of 8 MiB, with an +average value of about 7.8 MiB. + +Packet throughput can be measured by pktgen, which is a tool in the network for +generating traffic loads for network experiments. The mean packet throughput of +the four test runs seem quite different, ranging from 285.29 kpps to 297.76 +kpps. The average number of flows in these tests is 239.7k, and each run has a +minimum number of flows of 2 and a maximum number of flows of 1.001 Mil. At the +same time, the corresponding packet throughput differ between 227.3k and 398.9k +with an average packet throughput between 277.2k and 318.4k. Within each test +run of the five runs, when number of flows becomes larger, the packet +throughput seems not larger in the meantime. + +TC072 +----- +The amount of packets per second (PPS) and round trip times (RTT) between 2 VMs +on different blades are measured when increasing the amount of UDP flows sent +between the VMs using pktgen as packet generator tool. + +Round trip times and packet throughput between VMs can typically be affected by +the amount of flows set up and result in higher RTT and less PPS throughput. + +The RTT results are similar throughout the different test dates and runs + between 0 ms and 49 ms with an average leatency of less than 22 ms. The PPS +results are not as consistent as the RTT results, for the mean packet +throughput of the five runs differ from 250.6 kpps to 398.9 kpps. + +Network utilization is measured by sar, that is system activity reporter, which +can display the average statistics for the time since the system was started. +Network utilization statistics are collected during UDP flows sent between the +VMs using pktgen as packet generator tool. The largest total number of packets +transmitted per second look similar for four test runs, whose values change a +lot from 10 pps to 399 kpps, except the one on Sep. 14th, whose total number +of transmitted per second keep stable, that is 10 pps. Similarly, the total +number of packets received per second look the same for four runs, except the +one on Sep. 14th, whose value is only 10 pps. + +In some test runs when running with less than approx. 90000 flows the PPS +throughput is normally flatter compared to when running with more flows, after +which the PPS throughput decreases. For the other test runs there is however no +significant change to the PPS throughput when the number of flows are +increased. In some test runs the PPS is also greater with 250000 flows +compared to other test runs where the PPS result is less with only 2 flows. + +There are lost packets reported in most of the test runs. There is no observed +correlation between the amount of flows and the amount of lost packets. +The lost amount of packets normally differs a lot per test run. + +Detailed test results +--------------------- +The scenario was run on Intel POD6_ with: +Joid +OpenStack Mitaka +Onos Goldeneye +OpenVirtualSwitch 2.5.90 +OpenDayLight Beryllium + +Rationale for decisions +----------------------- +Pass + +Conclusions and recommendations +------------------------------- +Tests were successfully executed and metrics collected. +No SLA was verified. To be decided on in next release of OPNFV. diff --git a/docs/release/results/os-onos-sfc-ha.rst b/docs/release/results/os-onos-sfc-ha.rst new file mode 100644 index 000000000..e52ae3d55 --- /dev/null +++ b/docs/release/results/os-onos-sfc-ha.rst @@ -0,0 +1,517 @@ +.. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International +.. License. +.. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 + + +=============================== +Test Results for os-onos-sfc-ha +=============================== + +.. toctree:: + :maxdepth: 2 + + +fuel +==== + +.. _Grafana: http://testresults.opnfv.org/grafana/dashboard/db/yardstick-main +.. _POD2: https://wiki.opnfv.org/pharos?&#community_test_labs + +Overview of test results +------------------------ + +See Grafana_ for viewing test result metrics for each respective test case. It +is possible to chose which specific scenarios to look at, and then to zoom in +on the details of each run test scenario as well. + +All of the test case results below are based on 4 scenario test runs, each run +on the Ericsson POD2_ or LF POD2_ between September 5 and 10 in 2016. + +TC002 +----- +The round-trip-time (RTT) between 2 VMs on different blades is measured using +ping. Most test run measurements result on average between 0.5 and 0.6 ms. +A few runs start with a 1 - 1.5 ms RTT spike (This could be because of normal ARP +handling). One test run has a greater RTT spike of 1.9 ms, which is the same +one with the 0.7 ms average. The other runs have no similar spike at all. +To be able to draw conclusions more runs should be made. +SLA set to 10 ms. The SLA value is used as a reference, it has not +been defined by OPNFV. + +TC005 +----- +The IO read bandwidth looks similar between different dates, with an +average between approx. 170 and 200 MB/s. Within each test run the results +vary, with a minimum 2 MB/s and maximum 838 MB/s on the totality. Most runs +have a minimum BW of 3 MB/s (two runs at 2 MB/s). The maximum BW varies more in +absolute numbers between the dates, between 617 and 838 MB/s. +SLA set to 400 MB/s. The SLA value is used as a reference, it has not been +defined by OPNFV. + +TC010 +----- +The measurements for memory latency are similar between test dates and result +in approx. 1.2 ns. The variations within each test run are similar, between +1.215 and 1.219 ns. One exception is February 16, where the average is 1.222 +and varies between 1.22 and 1.28 ns. +SLA set to 30 ns. The SLA value is used as a reference, it has not been defined +by OPNFV. + +TC011 +----- +Packet delay variation between 2 VMs on different blades is measured using +Iperf3. On the first date the reported packet delay variation varies between +0.0025 and 0.011 ms, with an average delay variation of 0.0067 ms. +On the second date the delay variation varies between 0.002 and 0.006 ms, with +an average delay variation of 0.004 ms. + +TC012 +----- +Between test dates, the average measurements for memory bandwidth vary between +17.4 and 17.9 GB/s. Within each test run the results vary more, with a minimal +BW of 16.4 GB/s and maximum of 18.2 GB/s on the totality. +SLA set to 15 GB/s. The SLA value is used as a reference, it has not been +defined by OPNFV. + +TC014 +----- +The Unixbench processor test run results vary between scores 3080 and 3240, +one result each date. The average score on the total is 3150. +No SLA set. + +TC037 +----- +The amount of packets per second (PPS) and round trip times (RTT) between 2 VMs +on different blades are measured when increasing the amount of UDP flows sent +between the VMs using pktgen as packet generator tool. + +Round trip times and packet throughput between VMs can typically be affected by +the amount of flows set up and result in higher RTT and less PPS throughput. + +The RTT results are similar throughout the different test dates and runs at +approx. 15 ms. Some test runs show an increase with many flows, in the range +towards 16 to 17 ms. One exception standing out is Feb. 15 where the average +RTT is stable at approx. 13 ms. The PPS results are not as consistent as the +RTT results. +In some test runs when running with less than approx. 10000 flows the PPS +throughput is normally flatter compared to when running with more flows, after +which the PPS throughput decreases. Around 20 percent decrease in the worst +case. For the other test runs there is however no significant change to the PPS +throughput when the number of flows are increased. In some test runs the PPS +is also greater with 1000000 flows compared to other test runs where the PPS +result is less with only 2 flows. + +The average PPS throughput in the different runs varies between 414000 and +452000 PPS. The total amount of packets in each test run is approx. 7500000 to +8200000 packets. One test run Feb. 15 sticks out with a PPS average of +558000 and approx. 1100000 packets in total (same as the on mentioned earlier +for RTT results). + +There are lost packets reported in most of the test runs. There is no observed +correlation between the amount of flows and the amount of lost packets. +The lost amount of packets normally range between 100 and 1000 per test run, +but there are spikes in the range of 10000 lost packets as well, and even +more in a rare cases. + +CPU utilization statistics are collected during UDP flows sent between the VMs +using pktgen as packet generator tool. The average measurements for CPU +utilization ratio vary between 1% to 2%. The peak of CPU utilization ratio +appears around 7%. + +TC069 +----- +Between test dates, the average measurements for memory bandwidth vary between +15.5 and 25.4 GB/s. Within each test run the results vary more, with a minimal +BW of 9.7 GB/s and maximum of 29.5 GB/s on the totality. +SLA set to 6 GB/s. The SLA value is used as a reference, it has not been +defined by OPNFV. + +TC070 +----- +The amount of packets per second (PPS) and round trip times (RTT) between 2 VMs +on different blades are measured when increasing the amount of UDP flows sent +between the VMs using pktgen as packet generator tool. + +Round trip times and packet throughput between VMs can typically be affected by +the amount of flows set up and result in higher RTT and less PPS throughput. + +The RTT results are similar throughout the different test dates and runs at +approx. 15 ms. Some test runs show an increase with many flows, in the range +towards 16 to 17 ms. One exception standing out is Feb. 15 where the average +RTT is stable at approx. 13 ms. The PPS results are not as consistent as the +RTT results. +In some test runs when running with less than approx. 10000 flows the PPS +throughput is normally flatter compared to when running with more flows, after +which the PPS throughput decreases. Around 20 percent decrease in the worst +case. For the other test runs there is however no significant change to the PPS +throughput when the number of flows are increased. In some test runs the PPS +is also greater with 1000000 flows compared to other test runs where the PPS +result is less with only 2 flows. + +The average PPS throughput in the different runs varies between 414000 and +452000 PPS. The total amount of packets in each test run is approx. 7500000 to +8200000 packets. One test run Feb. 15 sticks out with a PPS average of +558000 and approx. 1100000 packets in total (same as the on mentioned earlier +for RTT results). + +There are lost packets reported in most of the test runs. There is no observed +correlation between the amount of flows and the amount of lost packets. +The lost amount of packets normally range between 100 and 1000 per test run, +but there are spikes in the range of 10000 lost packets as well, and even +more in a rare cases. + +Memory utilization statistics are collected during UDP flows sent between the +VMs using pktgen as packet generator tool. The average measurements for memory +utilization vary between 225MB to 246MB. The peak of memory utilization appears +around 340MB. + +TC071 +----- +The amount of packets per second (PPS) and round trip times (RTT) between 2 VMs +on different blades are measured when increasing the amount of UDP flows sent +between the VMs using pktgen as packet generator tool. + +Round trip times and packet throughput between VMs can typically be affected by +the amount of flows set up and result in higher RTT and less PPS throughput. + +The RTT results are similar throughout the different test dates and runs at +approx. 15 ms. Some test runs show an increase with many flows, in the range +towards 16 to 17 ms. One exception standing out is Feb. 15 where the average +RTT is stable at approx. 13 ms. The PPS results are not as consistent as the +RTT results. +In some test runs when running with less than approx. 10000 flows the PPS +throughput is normally flatter compared to when running with more flows, after +which the PPS throughput decreases. Around 20 percent decrease in the worst +case. For the other test runs there is however no significant change to the PPS +throughput when the number of flows are increased. In some test runs the PPS +is also greater with 1000000 flows compared to other test runs where the PPS +result is less with only 2 flows. + +The average PPS throughput in the different runs varies between 414000 and +452000 PPS. The total amount of packets in each test run is approx. 7500000 to +8200000 packets. One test run Feb. 15 sticks out with a PPS average of +558000 and approx. 1100000 packets in total (same as the on mentioned earlier +for RTT results). + +There are lost packets reported in most of the test runs. There is no observed +correlation between the amount of flows and the amount of lost packets. +The lost amount of packets normally range between 100 and 1000 per test run, +but there are spikes in the range of 10000 lost packets as well, and even +more in a rare cases. + +Cache utilization statistics are collected during UDP flows sent between the +VMs using pktgen as packet generator tool. The average measurements for cache +utilization vary between 205MB to 212MB. + +TC072 +----- +The amount of packets per second (PPS) and round trip times (RTT) between 2 VMs +on different blades are measured when increasing the amount of UDP flows sent +between the VMs using pktgen as packet generator tool. + +Round trip times and packet throughput between VMs can typically be affected by +the amount of flows set up and result in higher RTT and less PPS throughput. + +The RTT results are similar throughout the different test dates and runs at +approx. 15 ms. Some test runs show an increase with many flows, in the range +towards 16 to 17 ms. One exception standing out is Feb. 15 where the average +RTT is stable at approx. 13 ms. The PPS results are not as consistent as the +RTT results. +In some test runs when running with less than approx. 10000 flows the PPS +throughput is normally flatter compared to when running with more flows, after +which the PPS throughput decreases. Around 20 percent decrease in the worst +case. For the other test runs there is however no significant change to the PPS +throughput when the number of flows are increased. In some test runs the PPS +is also greater with 1000000 flows compared to other test runs where the PPS +result is less with only 2 flows. + +The average PPS throughput in the different runs varies between 414000 and +452000 PPS. The total amount of packets in each test run is approx. 7500000 to +8200000 packets. One test run Feb. 15 sticks out with a PPS average of +558000 and approx. 1100000 packets in total (same as the on mentioned earlier +for RTT results). + +There are lost packets reported in most of the test runs. There is no observed +correlation between the amount of flows and the amount of lost packets. +The lost amount of packets normally range between 100 and 1000 per test run, +but there are spikes in the range of 10000 lost packets as well, and even +more in a rare cases. + +Network utilization statistics are collected during UDP flows sent between the +VMs using pktgen as packet generator tool. Total number of packets received per +second was average on 200 kpps and total number of packets transmitted per +second was average on 600 kpps. + +Detailed test results +--------------------- +The scenario was run on Ericsson POD2_ and LF POD2_ with: +Fuel 9.0 +OpenStack Mitaka +Onos Goldeneye +OpenVirtualSwitch 2.5.90 +OpenDayLight Beryllium + +Rationale for decisions +----------------------- +Pass + +Tests were successfully executed and metrics collected. +No SLA was verified. To be decided on in next release of OPNFV. + +Conclusions and recommendations +------------------------------- +The pktgen test configuration has a relatively large base effect on RTT in +TC037 compared to TC002, where there is no background load at all. Approx. +15 ms compared to approx. 0.5 ms, which is more than a 3000 percentage +difference in RTT results. +Especially RTT and throughput come out with better results than for instance +the *fuel-os-nosdn-nofeature-ha* scenario does. The reason for this should +probably be further analyzed and understood. Also of interest could be +to make further analyzes to find patterns and reasons for lost traffic. +Also of interest could be to see if there are continuous variations where +some test cases stand out with better or worse results than the general test +case. + + +Joid +===== + +.. _Grafana: http://testresults.opnfv.org/grafana/dashboard/db/yardstick-main +.. _POD6: https://wiki.opnfv.org/pharos?&#community_test_labs + +Overview of test results +------------------------ + +See Grafana_ for viewing test result metrics for each respective test case. It +is possible to chose which specific scenarios to look at, and then to zoom in +on the details of each run test scenario as well. + +All of the test case results below are based on 4 scenario test runs, each run +on the Intel POD6_ between September 8 and 11 in 2016. + +TC002 +----- +The round-trip-time (RTT) between 2 VMs on different blades is measured using +ping. Most test run measurements result on average between 1.35 ms and 1.57 ms. +Only one test run has reached greatest RTT spike of 2.58 ms. Meanwhile, the +smallest network latency is 1.11 ms, which is obtained on Sep. 11st. In +general, the average of network latency of the four test runs are between 1.35 +ms and 1.57 ms. SLA set to be 10 ms. The SLA value is used as a reference, it +has not been defined by OPNFV. + +TC005 +----- +The IO read bandwidth actually refers to the storage throughput, which is +measured by fio and the greatest IO read bandwidth of the four runs is 175.4 +MB/s. The IO read bandwidth of the three runs looks similar, with an average +between 43.7 and 56.3 MB/s, except one on Sep. 8, for its maximum storage +throughput is only 107.9 MB/s. One of the runs has a minimum BW of 478 KM/s and +other has a maximum BW of 168.6 MB/s. The SLA of read bandwidth sets to be +400 MB/s, which is used as a reference, and it has not been defined by OPNFV. + +The results of storage IOPS for the four runs look similar with each other. The +IO read times per second of the four test runs have an average value between +978 per second and 1.20 K/s, and meanwhile, the minimum result is only 36 times +per second. + +TC010 +----- +The tool we use to measure memory read latency is lmbench, which is a series of +micro benchmarks intended to measure basic operating system and hardware system +metrics. The memory read latency of the four runs is between 1.164 ns and 1.244 +ns on average. The variations within each test run are quite different, some +vary from a large range and others have a small change. For example, the +largest change is on September 10, the memory read latency of which is ranging +from 1.128 ns to 1.381 ns. However, the results on September 11 change very +little. The SLA sets to be 30 ns. The SLA value is used as a reference, it has +not been defined by OPNFV. + +TC011 +----- +Iperf3 is a tool for evaluating the packet delay variation between 2 VMs on +different blades. The reported packet delay variations of the four test runs +differ from each other. In general, the packet delay of two runs look similar, +for they both stay stable within each run. And the mean packet delay of them +are 0.0772 ms and 0.0788 ms respectively. Of the four runs, the fourth has the +worst result, because the packet delay reaches 0.0838 ms. The rest one has a +large wide range from 0.0666 ms to 0.0798 ms. The SLA value sets to be 10 ms. +The SLA value is used as a reference, it has not been defined by OPNFV. + +TC012 +----- +Lmbench is also used to measure the memory read and write bandwidth, in which +we use bw_mem to obtain the results. Among the four test runs, the trend of the +memory bandwidth almost look similar, which all have a large wide range, and +the minimum and maximum results are 9.02 GB/s and 18.14 GB/s. Here SLA set to +be 15 GB/s. The SLA value is used as a reference, it has not been defined by +OPNFV. + +TC014 +----- +The Unixbench is used to evaluate the IaaS processing speed with regards to +score of single cpu running and parallel running. It can be seen from the +dashboard that the processing test results vary from scores 3395 to 3475, and +there is only one result one date. No SLA set. + +TC037 +----- +The amount of packets per second (PPS) and round trip times (RTT) between 2 VMs +on different blades are measured when increasing the amount of UDP flows sent +between the VMs using pktgen as packet generator tool. + +Round trip times and packet throughput between VMs can typically be affected by +the amount of flows set up and result in higher RTT and less PPS throughput. + +The mean packet throughput of the four test runs is between 362.1 kpps and +363.5 kpps, of which the result of the third run is the highest. The RTT +results of all the test runs keep flat at approx. 17 ms. It is obvious that the +PPS results are not as consistent as the RTT results. + +The No. flows of the four test runs are 240 k on average and the PPS results +look a little waved since the largest packet throughput is 418.1 kpps and the +minimum throughput is 326.5 kpps respectively. + +There are no errors of packets received in the four runs, but there are still +lost packets in all the test runs. The RTT values obtained by ping of the four +runs have the similar average vaue, that is approx. 17 ms, of which the worst +RTT is 39 ms on Sep. 11st. + +CPU load is measured by mpstat, and CPU load of the four test runs seem a +little similar, since the minimum value and the peak of CPU load is between 0 +percent and nine percent respectively. And the best result is obtained on Sep. +10, with an CPU load of nine percent. + +TC069 +----- +With the block size changing from 1 kb to 512 kb, the memory write bandwidth +tends to become larger first and then smaller within every run test, which +rangs from 25.9 GB/s to 26.6 GB/s and then to 18.1 GB/s on average. Since the +test id is one, it is that only the INT memory write bandwidth is tested. On +the whole, when the block size is from 2 kb to 16 kb, the memory write +bandwidth look similar with a minimal BW of 22.1 GB/s and peak value of 28.6 +GB/s. And then with the block size becoming larger, the memory write bandwidth +tends to decrease. SLA sets to be 7 GB/s. The SLA value is used as a reference, +it has not been defined by OPNFV. + +TC070 +----- +The amount of packets per second (PPS) and round trip times (RTT) between 2 VMs +on different blades are measured when increasing the amount of UDP flows sent +between the VMs using pktgen as packet generator tool. + +Round trip times and packet throughput between VMs can typically be affected by +the amount of flows set up and result in higher RTT and less PPS throughput. + +The network latency is measured by ping, and the results of the four test runs +look similar with each other, and within these test runs, the maximum RTT can +reach 39 ms and the average RTT is usually approx. 17 ms. The network latency +tested on Sep. 11 shows that it has a peak latency of 39 ms. But on the whole, +the average RTTs of the five runs keep flat and the network latency is +relatively short. + +Memory utilization is measured by free, which can display amount of free and +used memory in the system. The largest amount of used memory is 270 MiB on the +first two runs. In general, the mean used memory of two test runs have very +large memory utilization, which can reach 264 MiB on average. And the other two +runs have a large wide range of memory usage with the minimum value of 150 MiB +and the maximum value of 270 MiB. On the other hand, for the mean free memory, +the four test runs have the similar trend with that of the mean used memory. +In general, the mean free memory change from 220 MiB to 342 MiB. + +Packet throughput and packet loss can be measured by pktgen, which is a tool +in the network for generating traffic loads for network experiments. The mean +packet throughput of the four test runs seem quite different, ranging from +326.5 kpps to 418.1 kpps. The average number of flows in these tests is +240000, and each run has a minimum number of flows of 2 and a maximum number +of flows of 1.001 Mil. At the same time, the corresponding packet throughput +differ between 326.5 kpps and 418.1 kpps with an average packet throughput between +361.7 kpps and 363.5 kpps. In summary, the PPS results seem consistent. Within each +test run of the four runs, when number of flows becomes larger, the packet +throughput seems not larger at the same time. + +TC071 +----- +The amount of packets per second (PPS) and round trip times (RTT) between 2 VMs +on different blades are measured when increasing the amount of UDP flows sent +between the VMs using pktgen as packet generator tool. + +Round trip times and packet throughput between VMs can typically be affected by +the amount of flows set up and result in higher RTT and less PPS throughput. + +The network latency is measured by ping, and the results of the four test runs +look similar with each other. Within each test run, the maximum RTT is only 47 +ms and the average RTT is usually approx. 15 ms. On the whole, the average +RTTs of the four runs keep stable and the network latency is relatively small. + +Cache utilization is measured by cachestat, which can display size of cache and +buffer in the system. Cache utilization statistics are collected during UDP +flows sent between the VMs using pktgen as packet generator tool. The largest +cache size is 214 MiB, which is same for the four runs, and the smallest cache +size is 94 MiB. On the whole, the average cache size of the four runs look the +same and is between 198 MiB and 207 MiB. Meanwhile, the tread of the buffer +size keep flat, since they have a minimum value of 7 MiB and a maximum value of +8 MiB, with an average value of about 7.9 MiB. + +Packet throughput can be measured by pktgen, which is a tool in the network for +generating traffic loads for network experiments. The mean packet throughput of +the four test runs seem quite the same, which is approx. 363 kpps. The average +number of flows in these tests is 240k, and each run has a minimum number of +flows of 2 and a maximum number of flows of 1.001 Mil. At the same time, the +corresponding packet throughput differ between 327 kpps and 418 kpps with an +average packet throughput of about 363 kpps. Within each test run of the four +runs, when number of flows becomes larger, the packet throughput seems not +larger in the meantime. + +TC072 +----- +The amount of packets per second (PPS) and round trip times (RTT) between 2 VMs +on different blades are measured when increasing the amount of UDP flows sent +between the VMs using pktgen as packet generator tool. + +Round trip times and packet throughput between VMs can typically be affected by +the amount of flows set up and result in higher RTT and less PPS throughput. + +The RTT results are similar throughout the different test dates and runs +between 0 ms and 47 ms with an average leatency of less than 16 ms. The PPS +results are not as consistent as the RTT results, for the mean packet +throughput of the four runs differ from 361.7 kpps to 365.0 kpps. + +Network utilization is measured by sar, that is system activity reporter, which +can display the average statistics for the time since the system was started. +Network utilization statistics are collected during UDP flows sent between the +VMs using pktgen as packet generator tool. The largest total number of packets +transmitted per second look similar for two test runs, whose values change a +lot from 10 pps to 432 kpps. While results of the other test runs seem the same +and keep stable with the average number of packets transmitted per second of 10 +pps. However, the total number of packets received per second of the four runs +look similar, which have a large wide range of 2 pps to 657 kpps. + +In some test runs when running with less than approx. 250000 flows the PPS +throughput is normally flatter compared to when running with more flows, after +which the PPS throughput decreases. For the other test runs there is however no +significant change to the PPS throughput when the number of flows are +increased. In some test runs the PPS is also greater with 250000 flows +compared to other test runs where the PPS result is less with only 2 flows. + +There are lost packets reported in most of the test runs. There is no observed +correlation between the amount of flows and the amount of lost packets. +The lost amount of packets normally differs a lot per test run. + +Detailed test results +--------------------- +The scenario was run on Intel POD6_ with: +Joid +OpenStack Mitaka +Onos Goldeneye +OpenVirtualSwitch 2.5.90 +OpenDayLight Beryllium + +Rationale for decisions +----------------------- +Pass + +Conclusions and recommendations +------------------------------- +Tests were successfully executed and metrics collected. +No SLA was verified. To be decided on in next release of OPNFV. + diff --git a/docs/release/results/overview.rst b/docs/release/results/overview.rst new file mode 100644 index 000000000..b4a050545 --- /dev/null +++ b/docs/release/results/overview.rst @@ -0,0 +1,106 @@ +.. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International +.. License. +.. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 +.. (c) OPNFV, Ericsson AB and others. + +Yardstick test tesult document overview +======================================= + +.. _`Yardstick user guide`: artifacts.opnfv.org/yardstick/docs/userguide/index.html +.. _Dashboard: http://testresults.opnfv.org/grafana/dashboard/db/yardstick-main +.. _Jenkins: https://build.opnfv.org/ci/view/yardstick/ +.. _Scenarios: http://testresults.opnfv.org/grafana/dashboard/db/yardstick-scenarios + +This document provides an overview of the results of test cases developed by +the OPNFV Yardstick Project, executed on OPNFV community labs. + +Yardstick project is described in `Yardstick user guide`_. + +Yardstick is run systematically at the end of an OPNFV fresh installation. +The system under test (SUT) is installed by the installer Apex, Compass, Fuel +or Joid on Performance Optimized Datacenter (POD); One single installer per +POD. All the runnable test cases are run sequentially. The installer and the +POD are considered to evaluate whether the test case can be run or not. That is +why all the number of test cases may vary from 1 installer to another and from +1 POD to POD. + +OPNFV CI provides automated build, deploy and testing for +the software developed in OPNFV. Unless stated, the reported tests are +automated via Jenkins Jobs. Yardsrick test results from OPNFV Continous +Integration can be found in the following dashboard: + +* *Yardstick* Dashboard_: uses influx DB to store Yardstick CI test results and + Grafana for visualization (user: opnfv/ password: opnfv) + +The results of executed test cases are available in Dashboard_ and all logs are +stored in Jenkins_. + +It was not possible to execute the entire Yardstick test cases suite on the +PODs assigned for release verification over a longer period of time, due to +continuous work on the software components and blocking faults either on +environment, features or test framework. + +The list of scenarios supported by each installer can be described as follows: + ++-------------------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+ +| Scenario | Apex | Compass | Fuel | Joid | ++=========================+=========+=========+=========+=========+ +| os-nosdn-nofeature-noha | | | X | X | ++-------------------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+ +| os-nosdn-nofeature-ha | X | X | X | X | ++-------------------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+ +| os-odl_l2-nofeature-ha | X | X | X | X | ++-------------------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+ +| os-odl_l2-nofeature-noha| | | X | | ++-------------------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+ +| os-odl_l3-nofeature-ha | X | X | X | | ++-------------------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+ +| os-odl_l3-nofeature-noha| | | X | | ++-------------------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+ +| os-onos-sfc-ha | X | X | X | X | ++-------------------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+ +| os-onos-sfc-noha | | | X | | ++-------------------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+ +| os-onos-nofeature-ha | X | X | X | X | ++-------------------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+ +| os-onos-nofeature-noha | | | X | | ++-------------------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+ +| os-odl_l2-sfc-ha | | | X | | ++-------------------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+ +| os-odl_l2-sfc-noha | X | X | X | | ++-------------------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+ +| os-odl_l2-bgpvpn-ha | X | | X | | ++-------------------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+ +| os-odl_l2-bgpvpn-noha | | X | X | | ++-------------------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+ +| os-nosdn-kvm-ha | | | X | | ++-------------------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+ +| os-nosdn-kvm-noha | | X | X | | ++-------------------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+ +| os-nosdn-ovs-ha | | | X | | ++-------------------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+ +| os-nosdn-ovs-noha | X | | X | | ++-------------------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+ +| os-ocl-nofeature-ha | | | | | ++-------------------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+ +| os-nosdn-lxd-ha | | | | X | ++-------------------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+ +| os-nosdn-lxd-noha | | | | X | ++-------------------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+ +| os-odl_l2-fdio-noha | X | | | | ++-------------------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+ +| os-odl_l2-moon-ha | | X | | | ++-------------------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+ + +To qualify for release, the scenarios must have deployed and been successfully +tested in four consecutive installations to establish stability of deployment +and feature capability. It is a recommendation to run Yardstick test +cases over a longer period of time in order to better understand the behavior +of the system under test. + +References +---------- + +* IEEE Std 829-2008. "Standard for Software and System Test Documentation". + +* OPNFV Colorado release note for Yardstick. diff --git a/docs/release/results/results.rst b/docs/release/results/results.rst new file mode 100644 index 000000000..04c6b9f87 --- /dev/null +++ b/docs/release/results/results.rst @@ -0,0 +1,57 @@ +.. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International +.. License. +.. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 + +Results listed by scenario +========================== + +The following sections describe the yardstick results as evaluated for the +Colorado release scenario validation runs. Each section describes the +determined state of the specific scenario as deployed in the Colorado +release process. + +Scenario Results +================ + +.. _Dashboard: http://testresults.opnfv.org/grafana/dashboard/db/yardstick-main +.. _Jenkins: https://build.opnfv.org/ci/view/yardstick/ + +The following documents contain results of Yardstick test cases executed on +OPNFV labs, triggered by OPNFV CI pipeline, documented per scenario. + + +.. toctree:: + :maxdepth: 1 + + os-nosdn-nofeature-ha.rst + os-nosdn-nofeature-noha.rst + os-odl_l2-nofeature-ha.rst + os-odl_l2-bgpvpn-ha.rst + os-odl_l2-sfc-ha.rst + os-nosdn-kvm-ha.rst + os-onos-nofeature-ha.rst + os-onos-sfc-ha.rst + +Test results of executed tests are avilable in Dashboard_ and logs in Jenkins_. + + +Feature Test Results +==================== + +The following features were verified by Yardstick test cases: + + * IPv6 + + * HA (see :doc:`yardstick-opnfv-ha`) + + * KVM + + * Parser + + * Virtual Traffic Classifier (see :doc:`yardstick-opnfv-vtc`) + + * StorPerf + +.. note:: The test cases for IPv6 and Parser Projects are included in the + compass scenario. + diff --git a/docs/release/results/yardstick-opnfv-ha.rst b/docs/release/results/yardstick-opnfv-ha.rst new file mode 100644 index 000000000..ef1617342 --- /dev/null +++ b/docs/release/results/yardstick-opnfv-ha.rst @@ -0,0 +1,118 @@ +.. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International +.. License. +.. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 + + +=================================== +Test Results for yardstick-opnfv-ha +=================================== + +.. toctree:: + :maxdepth: 2 + +Details +======= +There are two test cases, TC019 and TC025, for high availability (HA) test of +OPNFV platform, and both test cases were executed in CMCC's lab with 3+2 HA +deployment, where the installer is Arno SR1 release of fuel. + + +TC019 +----- +This test case verifies the high availability of the openstack service, i.e. +"nova-api", on controller node. +There are one attacker, "kill-process" which kills all "nova-api" processes, +and two monitors, "openstack-cmd" monitoring "nova-api" service by openstack +command "nova image-list", while "process" monitor checks whether "nova-api" +process is running. Please see the test case description document for detail. + +Overview of test results +------------------------ +The service_outage_time of "nova image-list" is 0 seconds, while the +process_recover_time of "nova-api" is 300 seconds which equals the running time +of this test case, that means the "nova-api" service can't automatiocally +recover itself. + +Detailed test results +--------------------- +All "nova-api" process on the selected controller node was killed, and results +of two monitors were collected. Specifically, the results of "nova image-list" +request were collected from compute node and the status of "nova-api" process +were collected from the selected controller node. + +Each monitor was running in a single process. The running time of each monitor +was about 300 seconds with no waiting time between twice monitor running. For +"nova image-list", the running times is 127, that's to say there is one +openstack command request every 2.36 seconds; while the running times is 141 +for "nova-api" process checking, the accurancy is about 2.13 seconds. + +The outage time of each monitor, which the name is "service_outage_time" for +"openstack-cmd" monitor and "process_recover_time" for "process" monitor, is +defined as the duration from the begin time of the first failure request to the +end time of the last failure request. + +All "nova image-list" requestes were success, so the service_outage_time of +"nova image-list" is 0 second, while "nova-api" processes were not running for +all "process" checking, so the process_recover_time of "nova-api" is 300s. + +Rationale for decisions +----------------------- +The service_outage_time is 0 second, that means the failover time of openstack +service is less than 2.36s, which is the period of each request. However, the +process_recover_time equals test case runing time, that means the process is +not automatically recovered, so this test case is fail. + + +TC025 +----- +This test case verifies the high availability of controller node. When one of +the controller node abnormally shutdown, the service provided should be OK. +There are one attacker, "kill-process" which kills all "nova-api" processes, +and two "openstack-cmd" monitors, one monitoring openstack command +"nova image-list" and the other monitoring "neutron router-list". +Please see the test case description document for detail. + +Overview of test results +------------------------ +The both service_outage_time of "nova image-list" and "neutron router-list" +were 0 second. + +Detailed test results +--------------------- +A selected controller node was shutdown, and results of two monitors were +collected from compute node. + +The return results of "nova image-list" and "neutron router-list" requests from +compute node were collected, then the failure requestion time were statistic +service_outage_time of corresponding service. + +Each monitor was running in a single process. The running time of each monitor +was about 300 seconds with no waiting time between twice monitor running. For +"nova image-list", the running times is 49, that's to say there is one +openstack command request every 6.12 seconds; while the running times is 28 for +"neutron router-list", the accurancy is about 10.71 seconds. + +The "service_outage_time" for two monitors is defined as the duration from the +begin time of the first failure request to the end time of the last failure +request. + +All "nova image-list" and "neutron router-list" requestes were success, so the +service_outage_time of both two monitor were 0 second. + +Rationale for decisions +----------------------- +As service_outage_time of all monitors are 0 second, that means there are none +failure request in this test case running time, this test case is passed. + + +Conclusions and recommendations +------------------------------- +The TC019 shows the killed process will be not automatically recovered, which +should be imporved. + +There are several improvement points for HA test: +a) Running test cases in different enveriment deployed by different installers, +such as compass4nfv, apex and joid, with different versiones. +b) The period of each request is a little long, it needs more accurate test +method. +c) More test cases with different faults and different monitors are needed. diff --git a/docs/release/results/yardstick-opnfv-kvm.rst b/docs/release/results/yardstick-opnfv-kvm.rst new file mode 100644 index 000000000..ee4c6390b --- /dev/null +++ b/docs/release/results/yardstick-opnfv-kvm.rst @@ -0,0 +1,38 @@ +.. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International +.. License. +.. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 + + +==================================== +Test Results for yardstick-opnfv-kvm +==================================== + +.. toctree:: + :maxdepth: 2 + + +Details +======= + +.. after this doc is filled, remove all comments and include the scenario in +.. results.rst by removing the comment on the file name. + + +Overview of test results +------------------------ + +.. general on metrics collected, number of iterations + +Detailed test results +--------------------- + +.. info on lab, installer, scenario + +Rationale for decisions +----------------------- +.. result analysis, pass/fail + +Conclusions and recommendations +------------------------------- + +.. did the expected behavior occured? diff --git a/docs/release/results/yardstick-opnfv-parser.rst b/docs/release/results/yardstick-opnfv-parser.rst new file mode 100644 index 000000000..520d867ef --- /dev/null +++ b/docs/release/results/yardstick-opnfv-parser.rst @@ -0,0 +1,38 @@ +.. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International +.. License. +.. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 + + +======================================= +Test Results for yardstick-opnfv-parser +======================================= + +.. toctree:: + :maxdepth: 2 + + +Details +======= + +.. after this doc is filled, remove all comments and include the scenario in +.. results.rst by removing the comment on the file name. + + +Overview of test results +------------------------ + +.. general on metrics collected, number of iterations + +Detailed test results +--------------------- + +.. info on lab, installer, scenario + +Rationale for decisions +----------------------- +.. result analysis, pass/fail + +Conclusions and recommendations +------------------------------- + +.. did the expected behavior occured? diff --git a/docs/release/results/yardstick-opnfv-vtc.rst b/docs/release/results/yardstick-opnfv-vtc.rst new file mode 100644 index 000000000..059b5491f --- /dev/null +++ b/docs/release/results/yardstick-opnfv-vtc.rst @@ -0,0 +1,248 @@ +.. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International +.. License. +.. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 + +.. _Dashboard006: http://testresults.opnfv.org/grafana/dashboard/db/yardstick-tc006 +.. _Dashboard007: http://testresults.opnfv.org/grafana/dashboard/db/yardstick-tc007 +.. _Dashboard020: http://testresults.opnfv.org/grafana/dashboard/db/yardstick-tc020 +.. _Dashboard021: http://testresults.opnfv.org/grafana/dashboard/db/yardstick-tc021 +.. _DashboardVTC: http://testresults.opnfv.org/grafana/dashboard/db/vtc-dashboard +==================================== +Test Results for yardstick-opnfv-vtc +==================================== + +.. toctree:: + :maxdepth: 2 + + +Details +======= + +.. after this doc is filled, remove all comments and include the scenario in +.. results.rst by removing the comment on the file name. + + +Overview of test results +------------------------ + +.. general on metrics collected, number of iterations + +The virtual Traffic Classifier (vtc) Scenario supported by Yardstick is used by 4 Test Cases: + +- TC006 +- TC007 +- TC020 +- TC021 + + +* TC006 + +TC006 is the Virtual Traffic Classifier Data Plane Throughput Benchmarking Test. +It collects measures about the end-to-end throughput supported by the +virtual Traffic Classifier (vTC). +Results of the test are shown in the Dashboard006_ +The throughput is expressed as percentage of the available bandwidth on the NIC. + + +* TC007 + +TC007 is the Virtual Traffic Classifier Data Plane Throughput Benchmarking in presence of +noisy neighbors Test. +It collects measures about the end-to-end throughput supported by the +virtual Traffic Classifier when a user-defined number of noisy neighbors is deployed. +Results of the test are shown in the Dashboard007_ +The throughput is expressed as percentage of the available bandwidth on the NIC. + + +* TC020 + +TC020 is the Virtual Traffic Classifier Instantiation Test. +It verifies that a newly instantiated vTC is alive and functional and its instantiation +is correctly supported by the underlying infrastructure. +Results of the test are shown in the Dashboard020_ + + +* TC021 + +TC021 is the Virtual Traffic Classifier Instantiation in presence of noisy neighbors Test. +It verifies that a newly instantiated vTC is alive and functional and its instantiation +is correctly supported by the underlying infrastructure when noisy neighbors are present. +Results of the test are shown in the Dashboard021_ + +* Generic + +In the Generic scenario the Virtual Traffic Classifier is running on a standard Openstack +setup and traffic is being replayed from a neighbor VM. The traffic sent contains +various protocols and applications, and the VTC identifies them and exports the data. +Results of the test are shown in the DashboardVTC. + +Detailed test results +--------------------- + +* TC006 + +The results for TC006 have been obtained using the following test case +configuration: + +- Context: Dummy +- Scenario: vtc_throughput +- Network Techology: SR-IOV +- vTC Flavor: m1.large + + +* TC007 + +The results for TC007 have been obtained using the following test case +configuration: + +- Context: Dummy +- Scenario: vtc_throughput_noisy +- Network Techology: SR-IOV +- vTC Flavor: m1.large +- Number of noisy neighbors: 2 +- Number of cores per neighbor: 2 +- Amount of RAM per neighbor: 1G + + +* TC020 + +The results for TC020 have been obtained using the following test case +configuration: + +The results listed in previous section have been obtained using the following +test case configuration: + +- Context: Dummy +- Scenario: vtc_instantiation_validation +- Network Techology: SR-IOV +- vTC Flavor: m1.large + + +* TC021 + +The results listed in previous section have been obtained using the following +test case configuration: + +- Context: Dummy +- Scenario: vtc_instantiation_validation +- Network Techology: SR-IOV +- vTC Flavor: m1.large +- Number of noisy neighbors: 2 +- Number of cores per neighbor: 2 +- Amount of RAM per neighbor: 1G + + +For all the test cases, the user can specify different values for the parameters. + +* Generic + +The results listed in the previous section have been obtained, using a +standard Openstack setup. +The user can replay his/her own traffic and see the corresponding results. + +Rationale for decisions +----------------------- + +* TC006 + +The result of the test is a number between 0 and 100 which represents the percentage of bandwidth +available on the NIC that corresponds to the supported throughput by the vTC. + + +* TC007 + +The result of the test is a number between 0 and 100 which represents the percentage of bandwidth +available on the NIC that corresponds to the supported throughput by the vTC. + +* TC020 + +The execution of the test is done as described in the following: + +- The vTC is deployed on the OpenStack testbed; +- Some traffic is sent to the vTC; +- The vTC changes the header of the packets and sends them back to the packet generator; +- The packet generator checks that all the packets are received correctly and have been changed +correctly by the vTC. + +The test is declared as PASSED if all the packets are correcly received by the packet generator +and they have been modified by the virtual Traffic Classifier as required. + + +* TC021 + +The execution of the test is done as described in the following: + +- The vTC is deployed on the OpenStack testbed; +- The noisy neighbors are deployed as requested by the user; +- Some traffic is sent to the vTC; +- The vTC change the header of the packets and sends them back to the packet generator; +- The packet generator checks that all the packets are received correctly and have been changed +correctly by the vTC + +The test is declared as PASSED if all the packets are correcly received by the packet generator +and they have been modified by the virtual Traffic Classifier as required. + +* Generic + +The execution of the test consists of the following actions: + +- The vTC is deployed on the OpenStack testbed; +- The traffic generator VM is deployed on the Openstack Testbed; +- Traffic data are relevant to the network setup; +- Traffic is sent to the vTC; + + + +Conclusions and recommendations +------------------------------- + +* TC006 + +The obtained results show that the virtual Traffic Classifier can support up to 4 Gbps +(40% of the available bandwidth) correspond to the expected behaviour of the virtual +Traffic Classifier. +Using the configuration with SR-IOV and large flavor, the expected throughput should +generally be in the range between 3 and 4 Gbps. + + +* TC007 + +These results correspond to the configuration in which the virtual Traffic Classifier uses SR-IOV +Virtual Functions and the flavor is set to large for the virtual machine. +The throughput is in the range between 2.5 Gbps and 3.7 Gbps. +This shows that the effect of 2 noisy neighbors reduces the throughput of +the service between 10 and 20%. +Increasing number of neihbours would have a higher impact on the performance. + + +* TC020 + +The obtained results correspond to the expected behaviour of the virtual Traffic Classifier. +Using the configuration with SR-IOV and large flavor, the expected result is that the vTC is +correctly instantiated, it is able to receive and send packets using SR-IOV technology +and to forward packets back to the packet generator changing the TCP/IP header as required. + + +* TC021 + +The obtained results correspond to the expected behaviour of the virtual Traffic Classifier. +Using the configuration with SR-IOV and large flavor, the expected result is that the vTC is +correctly instantiated, it is able to receive and send packets using SR-IOV technology +and to forward packets back to the packet generator changing the TCP/IP header as required, +also in presence of noisy neighbors. + +* Generic + +The obtained results correspond to the expected behaviour of the virtual Traffic Classifier. +Using the aforementioned configuration the expected application protocols are identified +and their traffic statistics are demonstrated in the DashboardVTC, a group of popular +applications is selected to demonstrate the sound operation of the vTC. +The demonstrated application protocols are: +- HTTP +- Skype +- Bittorrent +- Youtube +- Dropbox +- Twitter +- Viber +- iCloud |