aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/docs/userguide
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authortjuyinkanglin <14_ykl@tongji.edu.cn>2016-07-20 17:40:34 +0800
committertjuyinkanglin <14_ykl@tongji.edu.cn>2016-07-28 19:10:27 +0800
commit29d861781b150371d3349a8f7c018b63b3fa3ddf (patch)
tree0321911828809d1310e4d986418625f312ac5a1a /docs/userguide
parent7d5d227ecb7163271cf1645d0affb0134f5ff039 (diff)
Add test case description and task file for TC053
JIRA: YARDSTICK-301 Change-Id: I7369ef520bb33381e08168c81eeb997ebaafd0f5 Signed-off-by: tjuyinkanglin <14_ykl@tongji.edu.cn>
Diffstat (limited to 'docs/userguide')
-rw-r--r--docs/userguide/opnfv_yardstick_tc053.rst142
1 files changed, 142 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/docs/userguide/opnfv_yardstick_tc053.rst b/docs/userguide/opnfv_yardstick_tc053.rst
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..8808d12d9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/docs/userguide/opnfv_yardstick_tc053.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,142 @@
+.. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
+.. License.
+.. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
+.. (c) OPNFV, Yin Kanglin and others.
+.. 14_ykl@tongji.edu.cn
+
+*************************************
+Yardstick Test Case Description TC053
+*************************************
+
++-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+|OpenStack Controller Load Balance Service High Availability |
+| |
++--------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
+|test case id | OPNFV_YARDSTICK_TC053: OpenStack Controller Load Balance |
+| | Service High Availability- |
++--------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
+|test purpose | This test case will verify the high availability of the |
+| | load balance service(current is HAProxy) that supports |
+| | OpenStack on controller node. When the load balance service |
+| | of a specified controller node is killed, whether other load |
+| | balancers on other controller nodes will work, and whether |
+| | the controller node will restart the load balancer are |
+| | checked. |
++--------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
+|test method | This test case kills the processes of load balance service |
+| | on a selected control node, then checks whether the request |
+| | of the related Openstack command is OK and the killed |
+| | processes are recovered. |
++--------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
+|attackers | In this test case, an attacker called "kill-process" is |
+| | needed. This attacker includes three parameters: |
+| | 1) fault_type: which is used for finding the attacker's |
+| | scripts. It should be always set to "kill-process" in this |
+| | test case. |
+| | 2) process_name: which is the process name of the specified |
+| | OpenStack service. If there are multiple processes use the |
+| | same name on the host, all of them are killed by this |
+| | attacker. |
+| | In this case. This parameter should always set to "swift- |
+| | proxy". |
+| | 3) host: which is the name of a control node being attacked. |
+| | |
+| | e.g. |
+| | -fault_type: "kill-process" |
+| | -process_name: "haproxy" |
+| | -host: node1 |
+| | |
++--------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
+|monitors | In this test case, two kinds of monitor are needed: |
+| | 1. the "openstack-cmd" monitor constantly request a specific |
+| | Openstack command, which needs two parameters: |
+| | 1) monitor_type: which is used for finding the monitor class |
+| | and related scritps. It should be always set to |
+| | "openstack-cmd" for this monitor. |
+| | 2) command_name: which is the command name used for request. |
+| | |
+| | 2. the "process" monitor check whether a process is running |
+| | on a specific node, which needs three parameters: |
+| | 1) monitor_type: which used for finding the monitor class |
+| | and related scripts. It should be always set to "process" |
+| | for this monitor. |
+| | 2) process_name: which is the process name for monitor |
+| | 3) host: which is the name of the node runing the process |
+| | In this case, the command_name of monitor1 should be |
+| | services that is supported by load balancer and the process- |
+| | name of monitor2 should be "haproxy", for example: |
+| | |
+| | e.g. |
+| | monitor1: |
+| | -monitor_type: "openstack-cmd" |
+| | -command_name: "nova image-list" |
+| | monitor2: |
+| | -monitor_type: "process" |
+| | -process_name: "haproxy" |
+| | -host: node1 |
+| | |
++--------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
+|metrics | In this test case, there are two metrics: |
+| | 1)service_outage_time: which indicates the maximum outage |
+| | time (seconds) of the specified Openstack command request. |
+| | 2)process_recover_time: which indicates the maximun time |
+| | (seconds) from the process being killed to recovered |
+| | |
++--------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
+|test tool | Developed by the project. Please see folder: |
+| | "yardstick/benchmark/scenarios/availability/ha_tools" |
+| | |
++--------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
+|references | ETSI NFV REL001 |
+| | |
++--------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
+|configuration | This test case needs two configuration files: |
+| | 1) test case file: opnfv_yardstick_tc053.yaml |
+| | -Attackers: see above "attackers" discription |
+| | -waiting_time: which is the time (seconds) from the process |
+| | being killed to stoping monitors the monitors |
+| | -Monitors: see above "monitors" discription |
+| | -SLA: see above "metrics" discription |
+| | |
+| | 2)POD file: pod.yaml |
+| | The POD configuration should record on pod.yaml first. |
+| | the "host" item in this test case will use the node name in |
+| | the pod.yaml. |
+| | |
++--------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
+|test sequence | description and expected result |
+| | |
++--------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
+|step 1 | start monitors: |
+| | each monitor will run with independently process |
+| | |
+| | Result: The monitor info will be collected. |
+| | |
++--------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
+|step 2 | do attacker: connect the host through SSH, and then execute |
+| | the kill process script with param value specified by |
+| | "process_name" |
+| | |
+| | Result: Process will be killed. |
+| | |
++--------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
+|step 3 | stop monitors after a period of time specified by |
+| | "waiting_time" |
+| | |
+| | Result: The monitor info will be aggregated. |
+| | |
++--------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
+|step 4 | verify the SLA |
+| | |
+| | Result: The test case is passed or not. |
+| | |
++--------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
+|post-action | It is the action when the test cases exist. It will check |
+| | the status of the specified process on the host, and restart |
+| | the process if it is not running for next test cases. |
+| | |
++--------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
+|test verdict | Fails only if SLA is not passed, or if there is a test case |
+| | execution problem. |
+| | |
++--------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+