Test Result of TC019 and TC025

JIRA: None

Change-Id: I425f957dade4bdb3bffe2f6c172fa6c3b68ce382
Signed-off-by: wym_libra <yimin.wang@huawei.com>

1 files changed, 87 insertions, 7 deletions

diff --git a/docs/results/yardstick-opnfv-ha.rst b/docs/results/yardstick-opnfv-ha.rst
index 50eb414bb..4ee9de847 100644
--- a/docs/results/yardstick-opnfv-ha.rst
+++ b/docs/results/yardstick-opnfv-ha.rst
@@ -10,29 +10,109 @@ Test Results for yardstick-opnfv-ha
 .. toctree::
    :maxdepth: 2
 
-
 Details
 =======
+There are two test cases, TC019 and TC025, for high availability (HA) test of
+OPNFV platform, and both test cases were executed in CMCC's lab with 3+2 HA
+deployment, where the installer is Arno SR1 release of fuel.
 
-.. after this doc is filled, remove all comments and include the scenario in
-.. results.rst by removing the comment on the file name.
 
+TC019
+-----
+This test case verifies the high availability of the openstack service, i.e.
+"nova-api", on controller node.
+There are one attacker, "kill-process" which kills all "nova-api" processes,
+and two monitors, "openstack-cmd" monitoring "nova-api" service by openstack
+command "nova image-list", while "process" monitor checks whether "nova-api"
+process is running. Please see the test case description document for detail.
 
 Overview of test results
 ------------------------
+The service_outage_time of "nova image-list" is 0 seconds, while the
+process_recover_time of "nova-api" is 300 seconds which equals the running time
+of this test case, that means the "nova-api" service can't automatiocally
+recover itself.
+
+Detailed test results
+---------------------
+All "nova-api" process on the selected controller node was killed, and results
+of two monitors were collected. Specifically, the results of "nova image-list"
+request were collected from compute node and the status of "nova-api" process
+were collected from the selected controller node.
+
+Each monitor was running in a single process. The running time of each monitor
+was about 300 seconds with no waiting time between twice monitor running. For
+"nova image-list", the running times is 127, that's to say there is one
+openstack command request every 2.36 seconds; while the running times is 141
+for "nova-api" process checking, the accurancy is about 2.13 seconds.
+
+The outage time of each monitor, which the name is "service_outage_time" for
+"openstack-cmd" monitor and "process_recover_time" for "process" monitor, is
+defined as the duration from the begin time of the first failure request to the
+end time of the last failure request.
+
+All "nova image-list" requestes were success, so the service_outage_time of
+"nova image-list" is 0 second, while "nova-api" processes were not running for
+all "process" checking, so the process_recover_time of "nova-api" is 300s.
+
+Rationale for decisions
+-----------------------
+The service_outage_time is 0 second, that means the failover time of openstack
+service is less than 2.36s, which is the period of each request. However, the
+process_recover_time equals test case runing time, that means the process is
+not automatically recovered, so this test case is fail.
+
+
+TC025
+-----
+This test case verifies the high availability of controller node. When one of
+the controller node abnormally shutdown, the service provided should be OK.
+There are one attacker, "kill-process" which kills all "nova-api" processes,
+and two "openstack-cmd" monitors, one monitoring openstack command
+"nova image-list" and the other monitoring "neutron router-list".
+Please see the test case description document for detail.
 
-.. general on metrics collected, number of iterations
+Overview of test results
+------------------------
+The both service_outage_time of "nova image-list" and "neutron router-list"
+were 0 second.
 
 Detailed test results
 ---------------------
+A selected controller node was shutdown, and results of two monitors were
+collected from compute node.
 
-.. info on lab, installer, scenario
+The return results of "nova image-list" and "neutron router-list" requests from
+compute node were collected, then the failure requestion time were statistic
+service_outage_time of corresponding service.
+
+Each monitor was running in a single process. The running time of each monitor
+was about 300 seconds with no waiting time between twice monitor running. For
+"nova image-list", the running times is 49, that's to say there is one
+openstack command request every 6.12 seconds; while the running times is 28 for
+"neutron router-list", the accurancy is about 10.71 seconds.
+
+The "service_outage_time" for two monitors is defined as the duration from the
+begin time of the first failure request to the end time of the last failure
+request.
+
+All "nova image-list" and "neutron router-list" requestes were success, so the
+service_outage_time of both two monitor were 0 second.
 
 Rationale for decisions
 -----------------------
-.. result analysis, pass/fail
+As service_outage_time of all monitors are 0 second, that means there are none
+failure request in this test case running time, this test case is passed.
+
 
 Conclusions and recommendations
 -------------------------------
+The TC019 shows the killed process will be not automatically recovered, which
+should be imporved.
 
-.. did the expected behavior occured?
+There are several improvement points for HA test:
+a) Running test cases in different enveriment deployed by different installers,
+such as compass4nfv, apex and joid, with different versiones.
+b) The period of each request is a little long, it needs more accurate test
+ method.
+c) More test cases with different faults and different monitors are needed.