diff options
author | QiLiang <liangqi1@huawei.com> | 2016-01-12 22:53:22 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | qi liang <liangqi1@huawei.com> | 2016-01-12 14:57:50 +0000 |
commit | d4fce3f39f4f637b4e0bff03851a3f252aee6e1a (patch) | |
tree | 6143ec549860a3518c5a7ed8b319df30716856ae /docs/configguide/yardstick_testcases/opnfv_yardstick_tc019.rst | |
parent | df2fe5be08cdaeaee264ae5fcae719e6fba13620 (diff) |
Rename tc019/tc025 & fix description for tc005
Added tc019 and tc025 to index of test cases in 03-list-of-tcs.
JIRA: -
Change-Id: I02696dc408d2d5c20becba29c49b3cff2a7049a9
Signed-off-by: QiLiang <liangqi1@huawei.com>
(cherry picked from commit 25095fb4e6d6a0e71581eee18f50c7d61f6a270d)
Diffstat (limited to 'docs/configguide/yardstick_testcases/opnfv_yardstick_tc019.rst')
-rw-r--r-- | docs/configguide/yardstick_testcases/opnfv_yardstick_tc019.rst | 129 |
1 files changed, 129 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/docs/configguide/yardstick_testcases/opnfv_yardstick_tc019.rst b/docs/configguide/yardstick_testcases/opnfv_yardstick_tc019.rst new file mode 100644 index 000000000..482260b48 --- /dev/null +++ b/docs/configguide/yardstick_testcases/opnfv_yardstick_tc019.rst @@ -0,0 +1,129 @@ +************************************* +Yardstick Test Case Description TC019 +************************************* + ++-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ +|Control Node Openstack Service High Availability | +| | ++--------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+ +|test case id | OPNFV_YARDSTICK_TC019_HA: Control node Openstack service down| +| | | ++--------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+ +|test purpose | This test case will verify the high availability of the | +| | service provided by OpenStack (like nova-api, neutro-server) | +| | on control node. | +| | | ++--------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+ +|test method | This test case kills the processes of a specific Openstack | +| | service on a selected control node, then checks whether the | +| | request of the related Openstack command is OK and the killed| +| | processes are recovered. | +| | | ++--------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+ +|attackers | In this test case, an attacker called "kill-process" is | +| | needed. This attacker includes three parameters: | +| | 1) fault_type: which is used for finding the attacker's | +| | scripts. It should be always set to "kill-process" in this | +| | test case. | +| | 2) process_name: which is the process name of the specified | +| | OpenStack service. If there are multiple processes use the | +| | same name on the host, all of them are killed by this | +| | attacker. | +| | 3) host: which is the name of a control node being attacked. | +| | | +| | e.g. | +| | -fault_type: "kill-process" | +| | -process_name: "nova-api" | +| | -host: node1 | +| | | ++--------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+ +|monitors | In this test case, two kinds of monitor are needed: | +| | 1. the "openstack-cmd" monitor constantly request a specific | +| | Openstack command, which needs two parameters: | +| | 1) monitor_type: which is used for finding the monitor class | +| | and related scritps. It should be always set to | +| | "openstack-cmd" for this monitor. | +| | 2) command_name: which is the command name used for request | +| | | +| | 2. the "process" monitor check whether a process is running | +| | on a specific node, which needs three parameters: | +| | 1) monitor_type: which used for finding the monitor class and| +| | related scritps. It should be always set to "process" | +| | for this monitor. | +| | 2) process_name: which is the process name for monitor | +| | 3) host: which is the name of the node runing the process | +| | | +| | e.g. | +| | monitor1: | +| | -monitor_type: "openstack-cmd" | +| | -command_name: "nova image-list" | +| | monitor2: | +| | -monitor_type: "process" | +| | -process_name: "nova-api" | +| | -host: node1 | +| | | ++--------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+ +|metrics | In this test case, there are two metrics: | +| | 1)service_outage_time: which indicates the maximum outage | +| | time (seconds) of the specified Openstack command request. | +| | 2)process_recover_time: which indicates the maximun time | +| | (seconds) from the process being killed to recovered | +| | | ++--------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+ +|test tool | Developed by the project. Please see folder: | +| | "yardstick/benchmark/scenarios/availability/ha_tools" | +| | | ++--------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+ +|references | ETSI NFV REL001 | +| | | ++--------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+ +|configuration | This test case needs two configuration files: | +| | 1) test case file: opnfv_yardstick_tc019.yaml | +| | -Attackers: see above "attackers" discription | +| | -waiting_time: which is the time (seconds) from the process | +| | being killed to stoping monitors the monitors | +| | -Monitors: see above "monitors" discription | +| | -SLA: see above "metrics" discription | +| | | +| | 2)POD file: pod.yaml | +| | The POD configuration should record on pod.yaml first. | +| | the "host" item in this test case will use the node name in | +| | the pod.yaml. | +| | | ++--------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+ +|test sequence | description and expected result | +| | | ++--------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+ +|step 1 | start monitors: | +| | each monitor will run with independently process | +| | | +| | Result: The monitor info will be collected. | +| | | ++--------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+ +|step 2 | do attacker: connect the host through SSH, and then execute | +| | the kill process script with param value specified by | +| | "process_name" | +| | | +| | Result: Process will be killed. | +| | | ++--------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+ +|step 3 | stop monitors after a period of time specified by | +| | "waiting_time" | +| | | +| | Result: The monitor info will be aggregated. | +| | | ++--------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+ +|step 4 | verify the SLA | +| | | +| | Result: The test case is passed or not. | +| | | ++--------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+ +|post-action | It is the action when the test cases exist. It will check the| +| | status of the specified process on the host, and restart the | +| | process if it is not running for next test cases | +| | | ++--------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+ +|test verdict | Fails only if SLA is not passed, or if there is a test case | +| | execution problem. | +| | | ++--------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+ |