summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMiikka Koistinen <miikka.koistinen@nokia.com>2018-04-09 17:40:39 +0300
committerRoss Brattain <ross.b.brattain@intel.com>2018-05-23 17:38:30 -0700
commit83e97cb521a39aca9225713df17dbbdc0e7fb7e3 (patch)
treee6b40ed042ac10515684297328e7785d4a06774b
parent256fc55e7fabfc70a445d2be8fd879fbfe218eb2 (diff)
Get HA test case results on failure
Now, yardstick HA test cases (which have 'sla action: monitor') do not output results if the test case SLA validation fails. This patch modifies the task runner and the serviceHA scenario so that during an SLA validation failure the test result data is captured correctly. Do similar changes in the general scenario. fix missing variable k s/envrioment/environment JIRA: YARDSTICK-1115 Change-Id: I648a8b229600c0ad089320ac3f803698f73aa800 Signed-off-by: Miikka Koistinen <miikka.koistinen@nokia.com> (cherry picked from commit dd87e15c9c4f0aff3577c1bcd68bd86dd2d64898) Signed-off-by: Ross Brattain <ross.b.brattain@intel.com>
-rw-r--r--yardstick/benchmark/core/task.py29
-rw-r--r--yardstick/benchmark/scenarios/availability/scenario_general.py28
-rwxr-xr-xyardstick/benchmark/scenarios/availability/serviceha.py21
-rw-r--r--yardstick/tests/unit/benchmark/scenarios/availability/test_scenario_general.py35
-rw-r--r--yardstick/tests/unit/benchmark/scenarios/availability/test_serviceha.py19
5 files changed, 56 insertions, 76 deletions
diff --git a/yardstick/benchmark/core/task.py b/yardstick/benchmark/core/task.py
index 955b8cae2..697cc007f 100644
--- a/yardstick/benchmark/core/task.py
+++ b/yardstick/benchmark/core/task.py
@@ -112,9 +112,9 @@ class Task(object): # pragma: no cover
continue
try:
- data = self._run(tasks[i]['scenarios'],
- tasks[i]['run_in_parallel'],
- output_config)
+ success, data = self._run(tasks[i]['scenarios'],
+ tasks[i]['run_in_parallel'],
+ output_config)
except KeyboardInterrupt:
raise
except Exception: # pylint: disable=broad-except
@@ -123,9 +123,15 @@ class Task(object): # pragma: no cover
testcases[tasks[i]['case_name']] = {'criteria': 'FAIL',
'tc_data': []}
else:
- LOG.info('Testcase: "%s" SUCCESS!!!', tasks[i]['case_name'])
- testcases[tasks[i]['case_name']] = {'criteria': 'PASS',
- 'tc_data': data}
+ if success:
+ LOG.info('Testcase: "%s" SUCCESS!!!', tasks[i]['case_name'])
+ testcases[tasks[i]['case_name']] = {'criteria': 'PASS',
+ 'tc_data': data}
+ else:
+ LOG.error('Testcase: "%s" FAILED!!!', tasks[i]['case_name'],
+ exc_info=True)
+ testcases[tasks[i]['case_name']] = {'criteria': 'FAIL',
+ 'tc_data': data}
if args.keep_deploy:
# keep deployment, forget about stack
@@ -240,6 +246,7 @@ class Task(object): # pragma: no cover
background_runners = []
+ task_success = True
result = []
# Start all background scenarios
for scenario in filter(_is_background_scenario, scenarios):
@@ -258,8 +265,8 @@ class Task(object): # pragma: no cover
for runner in runners:
status = runner_join(runner, background_runners, self.outputs, result)
if status != 0:
- raise RuntimeError(
- "{0} runner status {1}".format(runner.__execution_type__, status))
+ LOG.error("%s runner status %s", runner.__execution_type__, status)
+ task_success = False
LOG.info("Runner ended")
else:
# run serially
@@ -271,8 +278,8 @@ class Task(object): # pragma: no cover
LOG.error('Scenario NO.%s: "%s" ERROR!',
scenarios.index(scenario) + 1,
scenario.get('type'))
- raise RuntimeError(
- "{0} runner status {1}".format(runner.__execution_type__, status))
+ LOG.error("%s runner status %s", runner.__execution_type__, status)
+ task_success = False
LOG.info("Runner ended")
# Abort background runners
@@ -289,7 +296,7 @@ class Task(object): # pragma: no cover
base_runner.Runner.release(runner)
print("Background task ended")
- return result
+ return task_success, result
def atexit_handler(self):
"""handler for process termination"""
diff --git a/yardstick/benchmark/scenarios/availability/scenario_general.py b/yardstick/benchmark/scenarios/availability/scenario_general.py
index 9ac55471d..1fadd2532 100644
--- a/yardstick/benchmark/scenarios/availability/scenario_general.py
+++ b/yardstick/benchmark/scenarios/availability/scenario_general.py
@@ -26,7 +26,6 @@ class ScenarioGeneral(base.Scenario):
self.scenario_cfg = scenario_cfg
self.context_cfg = context_cfg
self.intermediate_variables = {}
- self.pass_flag = True
def setup(self):
self.director = Director(self.scenario_cfg, self.context_cfg)
@@ -47,7 +46,7 @@ class ScenarioGeneral(base.Scenario):
step['actionType'], step['actionKey'])
if actionRollbacker:
self.director.executionSteps.append(actionRollbacker)
- except Exception:
+ except Exception: # pylint: disable=broad-except
LOG.exception("Exception")
LOG.debug(
"\033[91m exception when running step: %s .... \033[0m",
@@ -59,31 +58,16 @@ class ScenarioGeneral(base.Scenario):
self.director.stopMonitors()
verify_result = self.director.verify()
-
- self.director.store_result(result)
-
for k, v in self.director.data.items():
if v == 0:
result['sla_pass'] = 0
verify_result = False
- self.pass_flag = False
- LOG.info(
- "\033[92m The service process not found in the host \
-envrioment, the HA test case NOT pass")
+ LOG.info("\033[92m The service process (%s) not found in the host environment", k)
- if verify_result:
- result['sla_pass'] = 1
- LOG.info(
- "\033[92m Congratulations, "
- "the HA test case PASS! \033[0m")
- else:
- result['sla_pass'] = 0
- self.pass_flag = False
- LOG.info(
- "\033[91m Aoh, the HA test case FAIL,"
- "please check the detail debug information! \033[0m")
+ result['sla_pass'] = 1 if verify_result else 0
+ self.director.store_result(result)
+
+ assert verify_result is True, "The HA test case NOT passed"
def teardown(self):
self.director.knockoff()
-
- assert self.pass_flag, "The HA test case NOT passed"
diff --git a/yardstick/benchmark/scenarios/availability/serviceha.py b/yardstick/benchmark/scenarios/availability/serviceha.py
index 454ea593e..b6e840143 100755
--- a/yardstick/benchmark/scenarios/availability/serviceha.py
+++ b/yardstick/benchmark/scenarios/availability/serviceha.py
@@ -29,7 +29,6 @@ class ServiceHA(base.Scenario):
self.context_cfg = context_cfg
self.setup_done = False
self.data = {}
- self.pass_flag = True
def setup(self):
"""scenario setup"""
@@ -71,20 +70,14 @@ class ServiceHA(base.Scenario):
LOG.info("Monitor '%s' stop!", self.__scenario_type__)
sla_pass = self.monitorMgr.verify_SLA()
- for _, v in self.data.items():
+ for k, v in self.data.items():
if v == 0:
- result['sla_pass'] = 0
- self.pass_flag = False
- LOG.info("The service process not found in the host envrioment, \
-the HA test case NOT pass")
- return
+ sla_pass = False
+ LOG.info("The service process (%s) not found in the host environment", k)
+
+ result['sla_pass'] = 1 if sla_pass else 0
self.monitorMgr.store_result(result)
- if sla_pass:
- result['sla_pass'] = 1
- LOG.info("The HA test case PASS the SLA")
- else:
- result['sla_pass'] = 0
- self.pass_flag = False
+
assert sla_pass is True, "The HA test case NOT pass the SLA"
return
@@ -94,8 +87,6 @@ the HA test case NOT pass")
for attacker in self.attackers:
attacker.recover()
- assert self.pass_flag, "The HA test case NOT passed"
-
def _test(): # pragma: no cover
"""internal test function"""
diff --git a/yardstick/tests/unit/benchmark/scenarios/availability/test_scenario_general.py b/yardstick/tests/unit/benchmark/scenarios/availability/test_scenario_general.py
index 45840d569..d1172d5a6 100644
--- a/yardstick/tests/unit/benchmark/scenarios/availability/test_scenario_general.py
+++ b/yardstick/tests/unit/benchmark/scenarios/availability/test_scenario_general.py
@@ -14,7 +14,8 @@ from yardstick.benchmark.scenarios.availability import scenario_general
class ScenarioGeneralTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
- def setUp(self):
+ @mock.patch.object(scenario_general, 'Director')
+ def setUp(self, *args):
self.scenario_cfg = {
'type': "general_scenario",
'options': {
@@ -36,32 +37,28 @@ class ScenarioGeneralTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
}
}
self.instance = scenario_general.ScenarioGeneral(self.scenario_cfg, None)
-
- self._mock_director = mock.patch.object(scenario_general, 'Director')
- self.mock_director = self._mock_director.start()
- self.addCleanup(self._stop_mock)
-
- def _stop_mock(self):
- self._mock_director.stop()
+ self.instance.setup()
+ self.instance.director.verify.return_value = True
def test_scenario_general_all_successful(self):
- self.instance.setup()
- self.instance.run({})
+
+ ret = {}
+ self.instance.run(ret)
self.instance.teardown()
+ self.assertEqual(ret['sla_pass'], 1)
def test_scenario_general_exception(self):
- mock_obj = mock.Mock()
- mock_obj.createActionPlayer.side_effect = KeyError('Wrong')
- self.instance.director = mock_obj
+ self.instance.director.createActionPlayer.side_effect = KeyError('Wrong')
self.instance.director.data = {}
- self.instance.run({})
+ ret = {}
+ self.instance.run(ret)
self.instance.teardown()
+ self.assertEqual(ret['sla_pass'], 1)
def test_scenario_general_case_fail(self):
- mock_obj = mock.Mock()
- mock_obj.verify.return_value = False
- self.instance.director = mock_obj
+ self.instance.director.verify.return_value = False
self.instance.director.data = {}
- self.instance.run({})
- self.instance.pass_flag = True
+ ret = {}
+ self.assertRaises(AssertionError, self.instance.run, ret)
self.instance.teardown()
+ self.assertEqual(ret['sla_pass'], 0)
diff --git a/yardstick/tests/unit/benchmark/scenarios/availability/test_serviceha.py b/yardstick/tests/unit/benchmark/scenarios/availability/test_serviceha.py
index 6bb3ec63b..dd656fbd5 100644
--- a/yardstick/tests/unit/benchmark/scenarios/availability/test_serviceha.py
+++ b/yardstick/tests/unit/benchmark/scenarios/availability/test_serviceha.py
@@ -60,15 +60,16 @@ class ServicehaTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
p.setup()
self.assertTrue(p.setup_done)
- # def test__serviceha_run_sla_error(self, mock_attacker, mock_monitor):
- # p = serviceha.ServiceHA(self.args, self.ctx)
+ @mock.patch.object(serviceha, 'baseattacker')
+ @mock.patch.object(serviceha, 'basemonitor')
+ def test__serviceha_run_sla_error(self, mock_monitor, *args):
+ p = serviceha.ServiceHA(self.args, self.ctx)
- # p.setup()
- # self.assertEqual(p.setup_done, True)
+ p.setup()
+ self.assertEqual(p.setup_done, True)
- # result = {}
- # result["outage_time"] = 10
- # mock_monitor.Monitor().get_result.return_value = result
+ mock_monitor.MonitorMgr().verify_SLA.return_value = False
- # ret = {}
- # self.assertRaises(AssertionError, p.run, ret)
+ ret = {}
+ self.assertRaises(AssertionError, p.run, ret)
+ self.assertEqual(ret['sla_pass'], 0)