diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'test_spec/vswitchperf_ltd.md')
| -rwxr-xr-x | test_spec/vswitchperf_ltd.md | 25 |
1 files changed, 25 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/test_spec/vswitchperf_ltd.md b/test_spec/vswitchperf_ltd.md index 98cf489d..e7a8d528 100755 --- a/test_spec/vswitchperf_ltd.md +++ b/test_spec/vswitchperf_ltd.md @@ -815,6 +815,31 @@ The following represents possible deployments which can help to determine the pe - Physical → virtual switch → physical. <br/> + - #####Test ID: LTD.Throughput.RFC2889.AddressLearningRate + **Title**: RFC2889 Address Learning Rate Test + + **Prerequisite Test**: LTD.Memory.RFC2889.AddressCachingCapacity + + **Priority**: + + **Description**: + + The aim of this test is to determine the rate of address learning of the DUT for a constant load (fixed length frames at a fixed interval time). The selected frame sizes are those previously defined under [Default Test Parameters](#DefaultParams), traffic should be sent with each IPv4/IPv6 address incremented by one. The rate at which the DUT learns a new address should be measured. The maximum caching capacity from LTD.Memory.RFC2889.AddressCachingCapacity should be taken into consideration as the maximum number of addresses for which the learning rate can be obtained. + + **Expected Result**: + It may be worthwhile to report the behaviour when operating beyond address capacity - some DUTS may be more friendly to new addresses than others. + + **Metrics collected**: + + The following are the metrics collected for this test: + + - The address learning rate of the DUT. + + **Deployment scenario**: + + - Physical → virtual switch → physical. + +<br/> [RFC1242]:(http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1242.txt) [RFC2544]:(http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2544.txt) [RFC2885]:(http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2885.txt) |