summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/docs/requirements/usecase.rst
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorGerald Kunzmann <kunzmann@docomolab-euro.com>2017-02-09 09:36:29 +0000
committerGerald Kunzmann <kunzmann@docomolab-euro.com>2017-02-15 15:30:08 +0000
commit78aa63af02df682b3c8d825c1bec9cec6cd3b207 (patch)
tree26ea243c8ac8c6e921c1c93d8292eb569f814dae /docs/requirements/usecase.rst
parentb74c2245db019bfadcae29190de4caa6fc6f826d (diff)
Update docs structure according to new guidelines in https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/DOC
Change-Id: I69e6536d9044dd9db2ed3cd698059aa3a800c318 Signed-off-by: Gerald Kunzmann <kunzmann@docomolab-euro.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'docs/requirements/usecase.rst')
-rw-r--r--docs/requirements/usecase.rst121
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 121 deletions
diff --git a/docs/requirements/usecase.rst b/docs/requirements/usecase.rst
deleted file mode 100644
index bdf8888..0000000
--- a/docs/requirements/usecase.rst
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,121 +0,0 @@
-.. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
-.. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
-
-=======================
-Use cases and scenarios
-=======================
-
-Use cases
-=========
-
-Resource reservation is a basic feature in any virtualization-based network
-operation. In order to perform such resource reservation from NFVO to VIM, NFVI
-capacity information is also necessary at the NFVO side. Below, four use cases
-to show typical requirements and solutions for capacity management and resource
-reservation is presented. A typical use case as considered for the Brahmaputra
-release is described in :ref:`uc-brahmaputra`.
-
-#. Resource capacity management
-#. Resource reservation for immediate use
-#. Resource reservation for future use
-#. Co-existence of reservations and allocation requests without reservation
-
-Resource capacity management
-----------------------------
-
-NFVO takes the first decision on in which NFVI it would instantiate a VNF. Along
-with NFVIs resource attributes (e.g. availability of hardware accelerators,
-particular CPU architectures etc.), NFVO needs to know available capacity of an
-NFVI in order to make an informed decision on selecting a particular NFVI. Such
-capacity information shall be in a coarser granularity than the respective VIM,
-as VIM maintains capacity information of its NFVI in fine details. However a
-very coarse granularity, like simply the number of available virtual CPU cores,
-may not be sufficient. In order to allow the NFVO to make well founded
-allocation decisions, an appropriate level to expose the available capacity may
-be per flavor. Capacity information may be required for the complete NFVI, or
-per partition or availability zone, or other granularities. Therefore, VIM
-requires to inform the NFVO about available capacity information regarding its
-NFVI at a pre-determined abstraction, either by a query-response, or in an
-event-based, or in a periodical way.
-
-Resource reservation for immediate use
---------------------------------------
-
-Reservation is inherently for the future. Even if some reserved resources are to
-be consumed instantly, there is a network latency between the issuance of a
-resource reservation request from the NFVO, a response from the VIM, and actual
-allocation of the requested resources to a VNF/VNFM. Within such latency,
-resource capacity in the NFVI in question could change, e.g., due to failure,
-allocation to a different request. Therefore, the response from a VIM to the
-NFVO to a resource reservation request for immediate use should have a validity
-period which shows until when this VIM can hold the requested resources. During
-this time, the NFVO should proceed to allocation if it wishes to consume the
-reserved requested. If allocation is not performed within the validity period,
-the response from VIM for a particular resource reservation request becomes
-invalid and VIM is not liable to provide those resources to NFVO/VNFM anymore.
-Reservations requests for immediate use do not have a start time but may have
-an end time.
-
-Resource reservation for future use
------------------------------------
-
-Network operators may want to reserve extra resources for future use. Such
-necessity could arise from predicted congestion in telecom nodes e.g. due to
-local traffic spikes for concerts, natural disasters etc. In such a case, the
-NFVO, while sending a resource reservation request to the VIM, shall include a
-start time (and an end time if necessary). The start time indicates at what
-time the reserved resource shall be available to a designated consumer e.g. a
-VNF/VNFM. Here, the requirement is that the reserved resources shall be
-available when the start time arrives. After the start time has arrived, the
-reserved resources are allocated to the designated consumer(s). An explicit
-allocation request is needed. How actually these requested resources are held
-by the VIM for the period in between the arrival of the resource reservation
-request and the actual allocation is outside the scope of this requirement
-project.
-
-Co-existence of reservations and allocation requests without reservation
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-In a real environment VIM will have to handle allocation requests without any
-time reference, i.e. time-unbound, together with time-bound reservations and
-allocation requests with an explicitly indicated end-time. A granted
-reservation for the future will effectively reduce the available capacity for
-any new time-unbound allocation request. The consequence is that reservations,
-even those far in the future, may result in denial of service for new
-allocation requests.
-
-To alleviate this problem several approaches can be taken. They imply an
-implicit or explicit priority scheme:
-
-* Allocation requests without reservation and which are time-unbound will be
- granted resources in a best-effort way: if there is instant capacity, but the
- resources may be later withdrawn due to the start time of a previously
- granted reservation
-* Both allocation requests and reservation requests contain a priority which
- may be related to SLAs and contractual conditions between the tenant and the
- NFVI provider. Interactions may look like:
-
- * A reservation request for future use may cancel another, not yet
- started, reservation with lower priority
- * An allocation request without reservations and time-unbound [#unbound]_
- may be granted resources and prevent a future reservation with lower
- priority from getting resources at start time
- * A reservation request may result in terminating resources allocated to a
- request with no reservation, if the latter has lower priority
-
-.. [#unbound] In this case, the consumer (VNFM or NFVO) requests to immediately
- instantiate and assign virtualized resources without having
- reserved the resources beforehand
-
-Scenarios
-=========
-
-This section describes the expected behavior of the system in different
-scenarios.
-
-As we are targeting a cloud platform with the above use cases, it is crucial to
-keep the flexibility in the system. By this means it is hard to explicitely
-block hardware resources for the future and ensure their availablility for
-allocation therefore it can happen that the reservation plan cannot be fulfilled
-due to certain changes in the underlying environment. We need to ensure that we
-are prepared for error and edge cases during the design period.