diff options
author | 2016-05-26 14:47:27 +0100 | |
---|---|---|
committer | 2016-06-07 09:40:56 +0100 | |
commit | f5fd9fa807f85a09466b740a475007b13654dce2 (patch) | |
tree | 3f61343b78ff41761177642b254fea2097889fdb /specs | |
parent | 7f666d1ac67abdafd91ae1b3dc31010f6c28c62f (diff) |
specs: Enable gerrit build of specs documentation
This patch allows gerrit to parse the spec
documentation and publishes to artifacts on merge.
Change-Id: Ib9d5b1229975d2b9819320af22973008885c4f58
Signed-off-by: Mark D. Gray <mark.d.gray@intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'specs')
-rw-r--r-- | specs/High-Priority-Traffic-Path.rst | 260 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | specs/template.rst | 272 |
2 files changed, 0 insertions, 532 deletions
diff --git a/specs/High-Priority-Traffic-Path.rst b/specs/High-Priority-Traffic-Path.rst deleted file mode 100644 index 6243cbe..0000000 --- a/specs/High-Priority-Traffic-Path.rst +++ /dev/null @@ -1,260 +0,0 @@ -.. - This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported - License. - - http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/legalcode - -========================================== -High Priority Traffic Path -========================================== - -https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/ovsnfv/OVSFV+Requirement+-+High+Priority+Traffic+Path - -Problem description -=================== - -A network design may need to adequately accommodate multiple classes of traffic, each -class requiring different levels of service in critical network elements. - -As a concrete example, a network element managed by a service provider may be -handling voice and elastic data traffic. Voice traffic requires that the end-to-end -latency and jitter is bounded to some numerical limit (in msec) accuracy in order to ensure -sufficient quality-of-service (QoS) for the participants in the voice call. -Elastic data traffic does not impose the same demanding requirements on the network -(there will be essentially no requirement on jitter. For example, when downloading a -large file across the Internet, although the bandwidth requirements may be high there -is usually no requirement that the file arrives within a bounded time interval. - -Depending on the scheduling algorithms running on the network element, -frames belonging to the data traffic may get transmitted before frames -belonging to the voice traffic introducing unwanted latency or jitter. -Therefore, in order to ensure deterministic latency and jitter characteristics -end-to-end, each network element through which the voice traffic traverses -must ensure that voice traffic is handled deterministically. - -Hardware switches have typically been designed to ensure certain classes -of traffic can be scheduled ahead of other classes and are also -over-provisioned which further ensures deterministic behavior when -handling high priority traffic. However, software switches (which includes -virtual switches such as Open vSwitch) may require modification in order -to achieve this deterministic behavior. - -Use Cases ---------- - -1. Program classes of service - -The End User specifies a number of classes of service. Each class of service -will be represented by the value of a particular field in a frame. The class -of service determines the priority treatment which flows in the class will -receive, while maintaining a relative level of priority for other classes and -a default level of treatment for the lowest priority class of service. As -such, each class of service will be associated with a priority. The End User -will associate classes of service and priorities to ingress ports with the -expectation that frames that arrive on these ingress ports will get -scheduled following the specified priorities. - -Note: Priority treatment of the classes of service cannot cause any one of -the classes (even the default class) from being transferred at all. In other -words, a strict priority treatment would likely not be successful for serving -all classes eventually, and this is a key consideration. - -2. Forward high priority network traffic - -A remote network element sends traffic to Open vSwitch. The remote network -element, indicates the class of service to which this flow of traffic belongs -to by modifying a pre-determined but arbitrary field in the frame as specified -in Use Case 1. Some examples include the Differentiated Services Code Point -(DSCP) in an IP packet or the Priority Code Point (PCP) in an Ethernet frame. -The relative priority treatment that frames get processed by Open vSwitch can be guaranteed by the -values populated in these fields when the fields are different. If the fields -are the same, ordering is not deterministic. - -For example: Packet A is sent with a DSCP value of 0 and packet B is sent -with a value of 46; 0 has a lower priority than 46. Packet A arrives -before packet B. If Open vSwitch has been configured as such, Packet -B will be transmitted before Packet A. - -Proposed change -=============== - -TBD - -Alternatives ------------- - -TBD - -OVSDB schema impact -------------------- - -TBD - -User interface impact ---------------------- - -TBD - -Security impact ---------------- - -TBD - -Other end user impact ---------------------- - -TBD - -Performance Impact ------------------- - -TBD - -Other deployer impact ---------------------- - -TBD - -Developer impact ----------------- - -TBD - -Implementation -============== - -Assignee(s) ------------ - -Who is leading the writing of the code? Or is this a blueprint where you're -throwing it out there to see who picks it up? - -If more than one person is working on the implementation, please designate the -primary author and contact. - -Primary assignee: - <email address> - -Other contributors: - <email address> - -Work Items ----------- - -TBD - -Dependencies -============ - -TBD - -Testing -======= - -In order to test how effectively the virtual switch handles high priority traffic -types, the following scheme is suggested.:: - - +---------------------------+ Ingress Traffic Parameters - | | +-------------------------------------------+ - | | - | | Packet Size: The size of the Ethernet frames - | | - | | Tmax: RFC2544 Max. Throughput for traffic of - | PHY0 <-------+ "Packet Size" - | | - | | Total Offered Rate: The offered rate of both - | | traffic classes combined expressed as a % of - | | Tmax - | | - | | Ingress Rates are expressed as a percentage - | | of Total Offered Rate. - | | - | | Class A: - | OVS | Ethernet PCP = 0 (Background) - | (BR0) | Ingress Rate : rate_ingress_a(n) Mfps - | | - | | Class B: - | | Ethernet PCP = 7 (Highest) - | | Ingress Rate : rate_ingress_b(n) Mfps - | | - | | Egress Traffic Measurements - | | +-------------------------------------------+ - | | Class A: - | | Egress Throughput : rate_egress_a(n) Mfps - | | Egress Latency : max_lat_egrees_a(n) ms - | | Egress Jitter : max_jit_egress_a(n) ms - | PHY1 +-------> - | | Class B: - | | Egress Throughput : rate_egress_b(n) Mfps - | | Egress Latency : max_lat_egrees_b(n) ms - +---------------------------+ Egress Jitter : max_jit_egress_b(n) ms - - -Open vSwitch is configured to forward traffic between two ports agnostic to the -traffic type. For example, using the following command: - -ovs-ofctl add-flow br0 in_port=0,actions=output:1 - -The test will be carried out with the functionality to enable high-priority -traffic enabled and disabled in order to guage the change in performance for -both cases. - -Two classes of traffic will be generated by a traffic generator. In the example -above, the classes are differentiated using the Ethernet PCP field. However, -another means for differentiating traffic could be used, depending the -prioritization scheme that is developed. - -Tests should be performed for each combination of: - -* Packet Sizes in (64, 512) -* Total Offered Rate in (80, 120, 150) -* rate_ingress_b(n) / rate_ingress_a(n) in (0.1, 0.2, 0.5) - -For each set, the following metrics should be collected for each traffic -class over a specified time period: - -Egress Throughput (Mfps) -Maximum Egress Latency (ms) -Maximum Egress Jitter (ms) - -Documentation Impact -==================== - -TBD - -References -========== - -Please add any useful references here. You are not required to have any -reference. Moreover, this specification should still make sense when your -references are unavailable. Examples of what you could include are: - -* Links to mailing list or IRC discussions - -- http://lists.opnfv.org/pipermail/opnfv-tech-discuss/2015-December/007193.html -- http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-ovsnfv/2016/opnfv-ovsnfv.2016-03-07-13.01.html - -* Links to relevant research, if appropriate - -- https://wiki.opnfv.org/download/attachments/5046510/qos_mechanisms.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1459187636000&api=v2 - -* Related specifications as appropriate - -* Anything else you feel it is worthwhile to refer to - - -History -======= - -Optional section intended to be used each time the spec -is updated to describe new design, API or any database schema -updated. Useful to let reader understand what's happened along the -time. - -.. list-table:: Revisions - :header-rows: 1 - - * - Release Name - - Description - * - Colorado - - Introduced diff --git a/specs/template.rst b/specs/template.rst deleted file mode 100644 index cc5dfd8..0000000 --- a/specs/template.rst +++ /dev/null @@ -1,272 +0,0 @@ -.. - This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported - License. - - http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/legalcode - -========================================== -Example Spec - The title of your blueprint -========================================== - -Include the URL of OPNFV wiki page description: - -https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/ovsnfv/OVSFV+Requirement+-+Example - -Introduction paragraph -- why are we doing anything? A single paragraph of -prose that operators can understand. The title and this first paragraph -should be used as the subject line and body of the commit message -respectively. - -Some notes about the process: - -* The aim of this document is first to define the problem we need to solve, - and second agree the overall approach to solve that problem. - -* This is not intended to be extensive documentation for a new feature. - -* You should aim to get your spec approved before writing your code. - While you are free to write prototypes and code before getting your spec - approved, its possible that the outcome of the spec review process leads - you towards a fundamentally different solution than you first envisaged. - -* But, API changes are held to a much higher level of scrutiny. - As soon as an API change merges, we must assume it could be in production - somewhere, and as such, we then need to support that API change forever. - To avoid getting that wrong, we do want lots of details about API changes - upfront. - -Some notes about using this template: - -* Your spec should be in ReSTructured text, like this template. - -* Please wrap text at 79 columns. - -* Please do not delete any of the sections in this template. If you have - nothing to say for a whole section, just write: None - -* For help with syntax, see http://sphinx-doc.org/rest.html - -* To test out your formatting, build the docs using sphinx - -* If you would like to provide a diagram with your spec, ascii diagrams are - required. http://asciiflow.com/ is a very nice tool to assist with making - ascii diagrams. The reason for this is that the tool used to review specs is - based purely on plain text. Plain text will allow review to proceed without - having to look at additional files which can not be viewed in gerrit. It - will also allow inline feedback on the diagram itself. - -Problem description -=================== - -A detailed description of the problem. What problem is this blueprint -addressing? - -Use Cases ---------- - -What use cases does this address? What impact on actors does this change have? -Ensure you are clear about the actors in each use case: Developer, End User, -Deployer etc. - -Proposed change -=============== - -Here is where you cover the change you propose to make in detail. How do you -propose to solve this problem? - -If this is one part of a larger effort make it clear where this piece ends. In -other words, what's the scope of this effort? - -At this point, if you would like to just get feedback on the problem and -proposed change, you can stop here and post this for review to get -preliminary feedback. If so please say: -Posting to get preliminary feedback on the scope of this spec. - -Alternatives ------------- - -What other ways could we do this thing? Why aren't we using those? This doesn't -have to be a full literature review, but it should demonstrate that thought has -been put into why the proposed solution is an appropriate one. - -OVSDB schema impact -------------------- - -Changes which require modifications to the data model often have a wider impact -on the system. The community often has strong opinions on how the data model -should be evolved, from both a functional and performance perspective. It is -therefore important to capture and gain agreement as early as possible on any -proposed changes to the data model. - -Questions which need to be addressed by this section include: - -* What new data objects and/or database schema changes is this going to - require? - -User interface impact ---------------------- - -Each user interface that is either added, changed or removed should have the -following: - -* Specification for the user interface - -* Example use case including typical examples for both data supplied - by the caller and the response - -Security impact ---------------- - -Describe any potential security impact on the system. Some of the items to -consider include: - -* Does this change touch sensitive data such as tokens, keys, or user data? - -* Does this change alter the interface in a way that may impact security, such as - a new way to access sensitive information? - -* Does this change involve cryptography or hashing? - -* Does this change require the use of sudo or any elevated privileges? - -* Does this change involve using or parsing user-provided data? This could - be directly at the API level or indirectly such as changes to a cache layer. - -* Can this change enable a resource exhaustion attack, such as allowing a - single interaction to consume significant server resources? - -Other end user impact ---------------------- - -Aside from the user interfaces, are there other ways a user will interact with this -feature? - -Performance Impact ------------------- - -Describe any potential performance impact on the system, for example -how often will new code be called, and is there a major change to the calling -pattern of existing code. - -Examples of things to consider here include: - -* Will the change include any locking, and if so what considerations are there - on holding the lock? - -Other deployer impact ---------------------- - -Discuss things that will affect how you deploy and configure Open vSwitch -that have not already been mentioned, such as: - -* What config options are being added? Should they be more generic than - proposed? Are the default values ones which will work well in - real deployments? - -* Is this a change that takes immediate effect after its merged, or is it - something that has to be explicitly enabled? - -* If this change is a new binary, how would it be deployed? - -* Please state anything that those doing continuous deployment, or those - upgrading from the previous release, need to be aware of. Also describe - any plans to deprecate configuration values or features. - -Developer impact ----------------- - -Discuss things that will affect other developers working on Open vSwitch, -such as: - -Implementation -============== - -Assignee(s) ------------ - -Who is leading the writing of the code? Or is this a blueprint where you're -throwing it out there to see who picks it up? - -If more than one person is working on the implementation, please designate the -primary author and contact. - -Primary assignee: - <email address> - -Other contributors: - <email address> - -Work Items ----------- - -Work items or tasks -- break the feature up into the things that need to be -done to implement it. Those parts might end up being done by different people, -but we're mostly trying to understand the timeline for implementation. - - -Dependencies -============ - -* If this requires functionality of another project that is not currently used - document that fact. - -* Does this feature require any new library dependencies or code otherwise not - included in Open vSwitch? Or does it depend on a specific version of library? - - -Testing -======= - -Please discuss the important scenarios needed to test here, as well as -specific edge cases we should be ensuring work correctly. For each -scenario please specify if this requires specialized hardware. - -Please discuss how the change will be tested: Open vSwitch unit tests, VSPERF -performance tests, Yardstick tests, etc. - -Is this untestable in gate given current limitations (specific hardware / -software configurations available)? If so, are there mitigation plans (3rd -party testing, gate enhancements, etc). - - -Documentation Impact -==================== - -Which audiences are affected most by this change, and which documentation -should be updated because of this change? Don't -repeat details discussed above, but reference them here in the context of -documentation for multiple audiences. If a config option -changes or is deprecated, note here that the documentation needs to be updated -to reflect this specification's change. - -References -========== - -Please add any useful references here. You are not required to have any -reference. Moreover, this specification should still make sense when your -references are unavailable. Examples of what you could include are: - -* Links to mailing list or IRC discussions - -* Links to relevant research, if appropriate - -* Related specifications as appropriate - -* Anything else you feel it is worthwhile to refer to - - -History -======= - -Optional section intended to be used each time the spec -is updated to describe new design, API or any database schema -updated. Useful to let reader understand what's happened along the -time. - -.. list-table:: Revisions - :header-rows: 1 - - * - Release Name - - Description - * - 2.x - - Introduced |