summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/keystone-moon/keystone/tests/unit/contrib/federation
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorasteroide <thomas.duval@orange.com>2015-09-01 16:03:26 +0200
committerasteroide <thomas.duval@orange.com>2015-09-01 16:04:53 +0200
commit92fd2dbfb672d7b2b1cdfd5dd5cf89f7716b3e12 (patch)
tree7ba22297042019e7363fa1d4ad26d1c32c5908c6 /keystone-moon/keystone/tests/unit/contrib/federation
parent26e753254f3e43399cc76e62892908b7742415e8 (diff)
Update Keystone code from official Github repository with branch Master on 09/01/2015.
Change-Id: I0ff6099e6e2580f87f502002a998bbfe12673498
Diffstat (limited to 'keystone-moon/keystone/tests/unit/contrib/federation')
-rw-r--r--keystone-moon/keystone/tests/unit/contrib/federation/__init__.py0
-rw-r--r--keystone-moon/keystone/tests/unit/contrib/federation/test_utils.py611
2 files changed, 611 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/keystone-moon/keystone/tests/unit/contrib/federation/__init__.py b/keystone-moon/keystone/tests/unit/contrib/federation/__init__.py
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..e69de29b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/keystone-moon/keystone/tests/unit/contrib/federation/__init__.py
diff --git a/keystone-moon/keystone/tests/unit/contrib/federation/test_utils.py b/keystone-moon/keystone/tests/unit/contrib/federation/test_utils.py
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..a8b4ae76
--- /dev/null
+++ b/keystone-moon/keystone/tests/unit/contrib/federation/test_utils.py
@@ -0,0 +1,611 @@
+# Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License"); you may
+# not use this file except in compliance with the License. You may obtain
+# a copy of the License at
+#
+# http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+#
+# Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+# distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT
+# WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. See the
+# License for the specific language governing permissions and limitations
+# under the License.
+
+
+from keystone.auth.plugins import mapped
+from keystone.contrib.federation import utils as mapping_utils
+from keystone import exception
+from keystone.tests import unit
+from keystone.tests.unit import mapping_fixtures
+
+
+class MappingRuleEngineTests(unit.BaseTestCase):
+ """A class for testing the mapping rule engine."""
+
+ def assertValidMappedUserObject(self, mapped_properties,
+ user_type='ephemeral',
+ domain_id=None):
+ """Check whether mapped properties object has 'user' within.
+
+ According to today's rules, RuleProcessor does not have to issue user's
+ id or name. What's actually required is user's type and for ephemeral
+ users that would be service domain named 'Federated'.
+ """
+ self.assertIn('user', mapped_properties,
+ message='Missing user object in mapped properties')
+ user = mapped_properties['user']
+ self.assertIn('type', user)
+ self.assertEqual(user_type, user['type'])
+ self.assertIn('domain', user)
+ domain = user['domain']
+ domain_name_or_id = domain.get('id') or domain.get('name')
+ domain_ref = domain_id or 'Federated'
+ self.assertEqual(domain_ref, domain_name_or_id)
+
+ def test_rule_engine_any_one_of_and_direct_mapping(self):
+ """Should return user's name and group id EMPLOYEE_GROUP_ID.
+
+ The ADMIN_ASSERTION should successfully have a match in MAPPING_LARGE.
+ They will test the case where `any_one_of` is valid, and there is
+ a direct mapping for the users name.
+
+ """
+
+ mapping = mapping_fixtures.MAPPING_LARGE
+ assertion = mapping_fixtures.ADMIN_ASSERTION
+ rp = mapping_utils.RuleProcessor(mapping['rules'])
+ values = rp.process(assertion)
+
+ fn = assertion.get('FirstName')
+ ln = assertion.get('LastName')
+ full_name = '%s %s' % (fn, ln)
+ group_ids = values.get('group_ids')
+ user_name = values.get('user', {}).get('name')
+
+ self.assertIn(mapping_fixtures.EMPLOYEE_GROUP_ID, group_ids)
+ self.assertEqual(full_name, user_name)
+
+ def test_rule_engine_no_regex_match(self):
+ """Should deny authorization, the email of the tester won't match.
+
+ This will not match since the email in the assertion will fail
+ the regex test. It is set to match any @example.com address.
+ But the incoming value is set to eviltester@example.org.
+ RuleProcessor should return list of empty group_ids.
+
+ """
+
+ mapping = mapping_fixtures.MAPPING_LARGE
+ assertion = mapping_fixtures.BAD_TESTER_ASSERTION
+ rp = mapping_utils.RuleProcessor(mapping['rules'])
+ mapped_properties = rp.process(assertion)
+
+ self.assertValidMappedUserObject(mapped_properties)
+ self.assertIsNone(mapped_properties['user'].get('name'))
+ self.assertListEqual(list(), mapped_properties['group_ids'])
+
+ def test_rule_engine_regex_many_groups(self):
+ """Should return group CONTRACTOR_GROUP_ID.
+
+ The TESTER_ASSERTION should successfully have a match in
+ MAPPING_TESTER_REGEX. This will test the case where many groups
+ are in the assertion, and a regex value is used to try and find
+ a match.
+
+ """
+
+ mapping = mapping_fixtures.MAPPING_TESTER_REGEX
+ assertion = mapping_fixtures.TESTER_ASSERTION
+ rp = mapping_utils.RuleProcessor(mapping['rules'])
+ values = rp.process(assertion)
+
+ self.assertValidMappedUserObject(values)
+ user_name = assertion.get('UserName')
+ group_ids = values.get('group_ids')
+ name = values.get('user', {}).get('name')
+
+ self.assertEqual(user_name, name)
+ self.assertIn(mapping_fixtures.TESTER_GROUP_ID, group_ids)
+
+ def test_rule_engine_any_one_of_many_rules(self):
+ """Should return group CONTRACTOR_GROUP_ID.
+
+ The CONTRACTOR_ASSERTION should successfully have a match in
+ MAPPING_SMALL. This will test the case where many rules
+ must be matched, including an `any_one_of`, and a direct
+ mapping.
+
+ """
+
+ mapping = mapping_fixtures.MAPPING_SMALL
+ assertion = mapping_fixtures.CONTRACTOR_ASSERTION
+ rp = mapping_utils.RuleProcessor(mapping['rules'])
+ values = rp.process(assertion)
+
+ self.assertValidMappedUserObject(values)
+ user_name = assertion.get('UserName')
+ group_ids = values.get('group_ids')
+ name = values.get('user', {}).get('name')
+
+ self.assertEqual(user_name, name)
+ self.assertIn(mapping_fixtures.CONTRACTOR_GROUP_ID, group_ids)
+
+ def test_rule_engine_not_any_of_and_direct_mapping(self):
+ """Should return user's name and email.
+
+ The CUSTOMER_ASSERTION should successfully have a match in
+ MAPPING_LARGE. This will test the case where a requirement
+ has `not_any_of`, and direct mapping to a username, no group.
+
+ """
+
+ mapping = mapping_fixtures.MAPPING_LARGE
+ assertion = mapping_fixtures.CUSTOMER_ASSERTION
+ rp = mapping_utils.RuleProcessor(mapping['rules'])
+ values = rp.process(assertion)
+
+ self.assertValidMappedUserObject(values)
+ user_name = assertion.get('UserName')
+ group_ids = values.get('group_ids')
+ name = values.get('user', {}).get('name')
+
+ self.assertEqual(user_name, name)
+ self.assertEqual([], group_ids,)
+
+ def test_rule_engine_not_any_of_many_rules(self):
+ """Should return group EMPLOYEE_GROUP_ID.
+
+ The EMPLOYEE_ASSERTION should successfully have a match in
+ MAPPING_SMALL. This will test the case where many remote
+ rules must be matched, including a `not_any_of`.
+
+ """
+
+ mapping = mapping_fixtures.MAPPING_SMALL
+ assertion = mapping_fixtures.EMPLOYEE_ASSERTION
+ rp = mapping_utils.RuleProcessor(mapping['rules'])
+ values = rp.process(assertion)
+
+ self.assertValidMappedUserObject(values)
+ user_name = assertion.get('UserName')
+ group_ids = values.get('group_ids')
+ name = values.get('user', {}).get('name')
+
+ self.assertEqual(user_name, name)
+ self.assertIn(mapping_fixtures.EMPLOYEE_GROUP_ID, group_ids)
+
+ def test_rule_engine_not_any_of_regex_verify_pass(self):
+ """Should return group DEVELOPER_GROUP_ID.
+
+ The DEVELOPER_ASSERTION should successfully have a match in
+ MAPPING_DEVELOPER_REGEX. This will test the case where many
+ remote rules must be matched, including a `not_any_of`, with
+ regex set to True.
+
+ """
+
+ mapping = mapping_fixtures.MAPPING_DEVELOPER_REGEX
+ assertion = mapping_fixtures.DEVELOPER_ASSERTION
+ rp = mapping_utils.RuleProcessor(mapping['rules'])
+ values = rp.process(assertion)
+
+ self.assertValidMappedUserObject(values)
+ user_name = assertion.get('UserName')
+ group_ids = values.get('group_ids')
+ name = values.get('user', {}).get('name')
+
+ self.assertEqual(user_name, name)
+ self.assertIn(mapping_fixtures.DEVELOPER_GROUP_ID, group_ids)
+
+ def test_rule_engine_not_any_of_regex_verify_fail(self):
+ """Should deny authorization.
+
+ The email in the assertion will fail the regex test.
+ It is set to reject any @example.org address, but the
+ incoming value is set to evildeveloper@example.org.
+ RuleProcessor should return list of empty group_ids.
+
+ """
+
+ mapping = mapping_fixtures.MAPPING_DEVELOPER_REGEX
+ assertion = mapping_fixtures.BAD_DEVELOPER_ASSERTION
+ rp = mapping_utils.RuleProcessor(mapping['rules'])
+ mapped_properties = rp.process(assertion)
+
+ self.assertValidMappedUserObject(mapped_properties)
+ self.assertIsNone(mapped_properties['user'].get('name'))
+ self.assertListEqual(list(), mapped_properties['group_ids'])
+
+ def _rule_engine_regex_match_and_many_groups(self, assertion):
+ """Should return group DEVELOPER_GROUP_ID and TESTER_GROUP_ID.
+
+ A helper function injecting assertion passed as an argument.
+ Expect DEVELOPER_GROUP_ID and TESTER_GROUP_ID in the results.
+
+ """
+
+ mapping = mapping_fixtures.MAPPING_LARGE
+ rp = mapping_utils.RuleProcessor(mapping['rules'])
+ values = rp.process(assertion)
+
+ user_name = assertion.get('UserName')
+ group_ids = values.get('group_ids')
+ name = values.get('user', {}).get('name')
+
+ self.assertValidMappedUserObject(values)
+ self.assertEqual(user_name, name)
+ self.assertIn(mapping_fixtures.DEVELOPER_GROUP_ID, group_ids)
+ self.assertIn(mapping_fixtures.TESTER_GROUP_ID, group_ids)
+
+ def test_rule_engine_regex_match_and_many_groups(self):
+ """Should return group DEVELOPER_GROUP_ID and TESTER_GROUP_ID.
+
+ The TESTER_ASSERTION should successfully have a match in
+ MAPPING_LARGE. This will test a successful regex match
+ for an `any_one_of` evaluation type, and will have many
+ groups returned.
+
+ """
+ self._rule_engine_regex_match_and_many_groups(
+ mapping_fixtures.TESTER_ASSERTION)
+
+ def test_rule_engine_discards_nonstring_objects(self):
+ """Check whether RuleProcessor discards non string objects.
+
+ Despite the fact that assertion is malformed and contains
+ non string objects, RuleProcessor should correctly discard them and
+ successfully have a match in MAPPING_LARGE.
+
+ """
+ self._rule_engine_regex_match_and_many_groups(
+ mapping_fixtures.MALFORMED_TESTER_ASSERTION)
+
+ def test_rule_engine_fails_after_discarding_nonstring(self):
+ """Check whether RuleProcessor discards non string objects.
+
+ Expect RuleProcessor to discard non string object, which
+ is required for a correct rule match. RuleProcessor will result with
+ empty list of groups.
+
+ """
+ mapping = mapping_fixtures.MAPPING_SMALL
+ rp = mapping_utils.RuleProcessor(mapping['rules'])
+ assertion = mapping_fixtures.CONTRACTOR_MALFORMED_ASSERTION
+ mapped_properties = rp.process(assertion)
+ self.assertValidMappedUserObject(mapped_properties)
+ self.assertIsNone(mapped_properties['user'].get('name'))
+ self.assertListEqual(list(), mapped_properties['group_ids'])
+
+ def test_rule_engine_returns_group_names(self):
+ """Check whether RuleProcessor returns group names with their domains.
+
+ RuleProcessor should return 'group_names' entry with a list of
+ dictionaries with two entries 'name' and 'domain' identifying group by
+ its name and domain.
+
+ """
+ mapping = mapping_fixtures.MAPPING_GROUP_NAMES
+ rp = mapping_utils.RuleProcessor(mapping['rules'])
+ assertion = mapping_fixtures.EMPLOYEE_ASSERTION
+ mapped_properties = rp.process(assertion)
+ self.assertIsNotNone(mapped_properties)
+ self.assertValidMappedUserObject(mapped_properties)
+ reference = {
+ mapping_fixtures.DEVELOPER_GROUP_NAME:
+ {
+ "name": mapping_fixtures.DEVELOPER_GROUP_NAME,
+ "domain": {
+ "name": mapping_fixtures.DEVELOPER_GROUP_DOMAIN_NAME
+ }
+ },
+ mapping_fixtures.TESTER_GROUP_NAME:
+ {
+ "name": mapping_fixtures.TESTER_GROUP_NAME,
+ "domain": {
+ "id": mapping_fixtures.DEVELOPER_GROUP_DOMAIN_ID
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ for rule in mapped_properties['group_names']:
+ self.assertDictEqual(reference.get(rule.get('name')), rule)
+
+ def test_rule_engine_whitelist_and_direct_groups_mapping(self):
+ """Should return user's groups Developer and Contractor.
+
+ The EMPLOYEE_ASSERTION_MULTIPLE_GROUPS should successfully have a match
+ in MAPPING_GROUPS_WHITELIST. It will test the case where 'whitelist'
+ correctly filters out Manager and only allows Developer and Contractor.
+
+ """
+
+ mapping = mapping_fixtures.MAPPING_GROUPS_WHITELIST
+ assertion = mapping_fixtures.EMPLOYEE_ASSERTION_MULTIPLE_GROUPS
+ rp = mapping_utils.RuleProcessor(mapping['rules'])
+ mapped_properties = rp.process(assertion)
+ self.assertIsNotNone(mapped_properties)
+
+ reference = {
+ mapping_fixtures.DEVELOPER_GROUP_NAME:
+ {
+ "name": mapping_fixtures.DEVELOPER_GROUP_NAME,
+ "domain": {
+ "id": mapping_fixtures.DEVELOPER_GROUP_DOMAIN_ID
+ }
+ },
+ mapping_fixtures.CONTRACTOR_GROUP_NAME:
+ {
+ "name": mapping_fixtures.CONTRACTOR_GROUP_NAME,
+ "domain": {
+ "id": mapping_fixtures.DEVELOPER_GROUP_DOMAIN_ID
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ for rule in mapped_properties['group_names']:
+ self.assertDictEqual(reference.get(rule.get('name')), rule)
+
+ self.assertEqual('tbo', mapped_properties['user']['name'])
+ self.assertEqual([], mapped_properties['group_ids'])
+
+ def test_rule_engine_blacklist_and_direct_groups_mapping(self):
+ """Should return user's group Developer.
+
+ The EMPLOYEE_ASSERTION_MULTIPLE_GROUPS should successfully have a match
+ in MAPPING_GROUPS_BLACKLIST. It will test the case where 'blacklist'
+ correctly filters out Manager and Developer and only allows Contractor.
+
+ """
+
+ mapping = mapping_fixtures.MAPPING_GROUPS_BLACKLIST
+ assertion = mapping_fixtures.EMPLOYEE_ASSERTION_MULTIPLE_GROUPS
+ rp = mapping_utils.RuleProcessor(mapping['rules'])
+ mapped_properties = rp.process(assertion)
+ self.assertIsNotNone(mapped_properties)
+
+ reference = {
+ mapping_fixtures.CONTRACTOR_GROUP_NAME:
+ {
+ "name": mapping_fixtures.CONTRACTOR_GROUP_NAME,
+ "domain": {
+ "id": mapping_fixtures.DEVELOPER_GROUP_DOMAIN_ID
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ for rule in mapped_properties['group_names']:
+ self.assertDictEqual(reference.get(rule.get('name')), rule)
+ self.assertEqual('tbo', mapped_properties['user']['name'])
+ self.assertEqual([], mapped_properties['group_ids'])
+
+ def test_rule_engine_blacklist_and_direct_groups_mapping_multiples(self):
+ """Tests matching multiple values before the blacklist.
+
+ Verifies that the local indexes are correct when matching multiple
+ remote values for a field when the field occurs before the blacklist
+ entry in the remote rules.
+
+ """
+
+ mapping = mapping_fixtures.MAPPING_GROUPS_BLACKLIST_MULTIPLES
+ assertion = mapping_fixtures.EMPLOYEE_ASSERTION_MULTIPLE_GROUPS
+ rp = mapping_utils.RuleProcessor(mapping['rules'])
+ mapped_properties = rp.process(assertion)
+ self.assertIsNotNone(mapped_properties)
+
+ reference = {
+ mapping_fixtures.CONTRACTOR_GROUP_NAME:
+ {
+ "name": mapping_fixtures.CONTRACTOR_GROUP_NAME,
+ "domain": {
+ "id": mapping_fixtures.DEVELOPER_GROUP_DOMAIN_ID
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ for rule in mapped_properties['group_names']:
+ self.assertDictEqual(reference.get(rule.get('name')), rule)
+ self.assertEqual('tbo', mapped_properties['user']['name'])
+ self.assertEqual([], mapped_properties['group_ids'])
+
+ def test_rule_engine_whitelist_direct_group_mapping_missing_domain(self):
+ """Test if the local rule is rejected upon missing domain value
+
+ This is a variation with a ``whitelist`` filter.
+
+ """
+ mapping = mapping_fixtures.MAPPING_GROUPS_WHITELIST_MISSING_DOMAIN
+ assertion = mapping_fixtures.EMPLOYEE_ASSERTION_MULTIPLE_GROUPS
+ rp = mapping_utils.RuleProcessor(mapping['rules'])
+ self.assertRaises(exception.ValidationError, rp.process, assertion)
+
+ def test_rule_engine_blacklist_direct_group_mapping_missing_domain(self):
+ """Test if the local rule is rejected upon missing domain value
+
+ This is a variation with a ``blacklist`` filter.
+
+ """
+ mapping = mapping_fixtures.MAPPING_GROUPS_BLACKLIST_MISSING_DOMAIN
+ assertion = mapping_fixtures.EMPLOYEE_ASSERTION_MULTIPLE_GROUPS
+ rp = mapping_utils.RuleProcessor(mapping['rules'])
+ self.assertRaises(exception.ValidationError, rp.process, assertion)
+
+ def test_rule_engine_no_groups_allowed(self):
+ """Should return user mapped to no groups.
+
+ The EMPLOYEE_ASSERTION should successfully have a match
+ in MAPPING_GROUPS_WHITELIST, but 'whitelist' should filter out
+ the group values from the assertion and thus map to no groups.
+
+ """
+ mapping = mapping_fixtures.MAPPING_GROUPS_WHITELIST
+ assertion = mapping_fixtures.EMPLOYEE_ASSERTION
+ rp = mapping_utils.RuleProcessor(mapping['rules'])
+ mapped_properties = rp.process(assertion)
+ self.assertIsNotNone(mapped_properties)
+ self.assertListEqual(mapped_properties['group_names'], [])
+ self.assertListEqual(mapped_properties['group_ids'], [])
+ self.assertEqual('tbo', mapped_properties['user']['name'])
+
+ def test_mapping_federated_domain_specified(self):
+ """Test mapping engine when domain 'ephemeral' is explicitely set.
+
+ For that, we use mapping rule MAPPING_EPHEMERAL_USER and assertion
+ EMPLOYEE_ASSERTION
+
+ """
+ mapping = mapping_fixtures.MAPPING_EPHEMERAL_USER
+ rp = mapping_utils.RuleProcessor(mapping['rules'])
+ assertion = mapping_fixtures.EMPLOYEE_ASSERTION
+ mapped_properties = rp.process(assertion)
+ self.assertIsNotNone(mapped_properties)
+ self.assertValidMappedUserObject(mapped_properties)
+
+ def test_create_user_object_with_bad_mapping(self):
+ """Test if user object is created even with bad mapping.
+
+ User objects will be created by mapping engine always as long as there
+ is corresponding local rule. This test shows, that even with assertion
+ where no group names nor ids are matched, but there is 'blind' rule for
+ mapping user, such object will be created.
+
+ In this test MAPPING_EHPEMERAL_USER expects UserName set to jsmith
+ whereas value from assertion is 'tbo'.
+
+ """
+ mapping = mapping_fixtures.MAPPING_EPHEMERAL_USER
+ rp = mapping_utils.RuleProcessor(mapping['rules'])
+ assertion = mapping_fixtures.CONTRACTOR_ASSERTION
+ mapped_properties = rp.process(assertion)
+ self.assertIsNotNone(mapped_properties)
+ self.assertValidMappedUserObject(mapped_properties)
+
+ self.assertNotIn('id', mapped_properties['user'])
+ self.assertNotIn('name', mapped_properties['user'])
+
+ def test_set_ephemeral_domain_to_ephemeral_users(self):
+ """Test auto assigning service domain to ephemeral users.
+
+ Test that ephemeral users will always become members of federated
+ service domain. The check depends on ``type`` value which must be set
+ to ``ephemeral`` in case of ephemeral user.
+
+ """
+ mapping = mapping_fixtures.MAPPING_EPHEMERAL_USER_LOCAL_DOMAIN
+ rp = mapping_utils.RuleProcessor(mapping['rules'])
+ assertion = mapping_fixtures.CONTRACTOR_ASSERTION
+ mapped_properties = rp.process(assertion)
+ self.assertIsNotNone(mapped_properties)
+ self.assertValidMappedUserObject(mapped_properties)
+
+ def test_local_user_local_domain(self):
+ """Test that local users can have non-service domains assigned."""
+ mapping = mapping_fixtures.MAPPING_LOCAL_USER_LOCAL_DOMAIN
+ rp = mapping_utils.RuleProcessor(mapping['rules'])
+ assertion = mapping_fixtures.CONTRACTOR_ASSERTION
+ mapped_properties = rp.process(assertion)
+ self.assertIsNotNone(mapped_properties)
+ self.assertValidMappedUserObject(
+ mapped_properties, user_type='local',
+ domain_id=mapping_fixtures.LOCAL_DOMAIN)
+
+ def test_user_identifications_name(self):
+ """Test varius mapping options and how users are identified.
+
+ This test calls mapped.setup_username() for propagating user object.
+
+ Test plan:
+ - Check if the user has proper domain ('federated') set
+ - Check if the user has property type set ('ephemeral')
+ - Check if user's name is properly mapped from the assertion
+ - Check if user's id is properly set and equal to name, as it was not
+ explicitely specified in the mapping.
+
+ """
+ mapping = mapping_fixtures.MAPPING_USER_IDS
+ rp = mapping_utils.RuleProcessor(mapping['rules'])
+ assertion = mapping_fixtures.CONTRACTOR_ASSERTION
+ mapped_properties = rp.process(assertion)
+ self.assertIsNotNone(mapped_properties)
+ self.assertValidMappedUserObject(mapped_properties)
+ mapped.setup_username({}, mapped_properties)
+ self.assertEqual('jsmith', mapped_properties['user']['id'])
+ self.assertEqual('jsmith', mapped_properties['user']['name'])
+
+ def test_user_identifications_name_and_federated_domain(self):
+ """Test varius mapping options and how users are identified.
+
+ This test calls mapped.setup_username() for propagating user object.
+
+ Test plan:
+ - Check if the user has proper domain ('federated') set
+ - Check if the user has propert type set ('ephemeral')
+ - Check if user's name is properly mapped from the assertion
+ - Check if user's id is properly set and equal to name, as it was not
+ explicitely specified in the mapping.
+
+ """
+ mapping = mapping_fixtures.MAPPING_USER_IDS
+ rp = mapping_utils.RuleProcessor(mapping['rules'])
+ assertion = mapping_fixtures.EMPLOYEE_ASSERTION
+ mapped_properties = rp.process(assertion)
+ self.assertIsNotNone(mapped_properties)
+ self.assertValidMappedUserObject(mapped_properties)
+ mapped.setup_username({}, mapped_properties)
+ self.assertEqual('tbo', mapped_properties['user']['name'])
+ self.assertEqual('abc123%40example.com',
+ mapped_properties['user']['id'])
+
+ def test_user_identification_id(self):
+ """Test varius mapping options and how users are identified.
+
+ This test calls mapped.setup_username() for propagating user object.
+
+ Test plan:
+ - Check if the user has proper domain ('federated') set
+ - Check if the user has propert type set ('ephemeral')
+ - Check if user's id is properly mapped from the assertion
+ - Check if user's name is properly set and equal to id, as it was not
+ explicitely specified in the mapping.
+
+ """
+ mapping = mapping_fixtures.MAPPING_USER_IDS
+ rp = mapping_utils.RuleProcessor(mapping['rules'])
+ assertion = mapping_fixtures.ADMIN_ASSERTION
+ mapped_properties = rp.process(assertion)
+ context = {'environment': {}}
+ self.assertIsNotNone(mapped_properties)
+ self.assertValidMappedUserObject(mapped_properties)
+ mapped.setup_username(context, mapped_properties)
+ self.assertEqual('bob', mapped_properties['user']['name'])
+ self.assertEqual('bob', mapped_properties['user']['id'])
+
+ def test_user_identification_id_and_name(self):
+ """Test varius mapping options and how users are identified.
+
+ This test calls mapped.setup_username() for propagating user object.
+
+ Test plan:
+ - Check if the user has proper domain ('federated') set
+ - Check if the user has proper type set ('ephemeral')
+ - Check if user's name is properly mapped from the assertion
+ - Check if user's id is properly set and and equal to value hardcoded
+ in the mapping
+
+ This test does two iterations with different assertions used as input
+ for the Mapping Engine. Different assertions will be matched with
+ different rules in the ruleset, effectively issuing different user_id
+ (hardcoded values). In the first iteration, the hardcoded user_id is
+ not url-safe and we expect Keystone to make it url safe. In the latter
+ iteration, provided user_id is already url-safe and we expect server
+ not to change it.
+
+ """
+ testcases = [(mapping_fixtures.CUSTOMER_ASSERTION, 'bwilliams'),
+ (mapping_fixtures.EMPLOYEE_ASSERTION, 'tbo')]
+ for assertion, exp_user_name in testcases:
+ mapping = mapping_fixtures.MAPPING_USER_IDS
+ rp = mapping_utils.RuleProcessor(mapping['rules'])
+ mapped_properties = rp.process(assertion)
+ context = {'environment': {}}
+ self.assertIsNotNone(mapped_properties)
+ self.assertValidMappedUserObject(mapped_properties)
+ mapped.setup_username(context, mapped_properties)
+ self.assertEqual(exp_user_name, mapped_properties['user']['name'])
+ self.assertEqual('abc123%40example.com',
+ mapped_properties['user']['id'])