diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/Documentation/cpu-freq/boost.txt')
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/Documentation/cpu-freq/boost.txt | 93 |
1 files changed, 93 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/Documentation/cpu-freq/boost.txt b/kernel/Documentation/cpu-freq/boost.txt new file mode 100644 index 000000000..dd62e1334 --- /dev/null +++ b/kernel/Documentation/cpu-freq/boost.txt @@ -0,0 +1,93 @@ +Processor boosting control + + - information for users - + +Quick guide for the impatient: +-------------------- +/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/boost +controls the boost setting for the whole system. You can read and write +that file with either "0" (boosting disabled) or "1" (boosting allowed). +Reading or writing 1 does not mean that the system is boosting at this +very moment, but only that the CPU _may_ raise the frequency at it's +discretion. +-------------------- + +Introduction +------------- +Some CPUs support a functionality to raise the operating frequency of +some cores in a multi-core package if certain conditions apply, mostly +if the whole chip is not fully utilized and below it's intended thermal +budget. The decision about boost disable/enable is made either at hardware +(e.g. x86) or software (e.g ARM). +On Intel CPUs this is called "Turbo Boost", AMD calls it "Turbo-Core", +in technical documentation "Core performance boost". In Linux we use +the term "boost" for convenience. + +Rationale for disable switch +---------------------------- + +Though the idea is to just give better performance without any user +intervention, sometimes the need arises to disable this functionality. +Most systems offer a switch in the (BIOS) firmware to disable the +functionality at all, but a more fine-grained and dynamic control would +be desirable: +1. While running benchmarks, reproducible results are important. Since + the boosting functionality depends on the load of the whole package, + single thread performance can vary. By explicitly disabling the boost + functionality at least for the benchmark's run-time the system will run + at a fixed frequency and results are reproducible again. +2. To examine the impact of the boosting functionality it is helpful + to do tests with and without boosting. +3. Boosting means overclocking the processor, though under controlled + conditions. By raising the frequency and the voltage the processor + will consume more power than without the boosting, which may be + undesirable for instance for mobile users. Disabling boosting may + save power here, though this depends on the workload. + + +User controlled switch +---------------------- + +To allow the user to toggle the boosting functionality, the cpufreq core +driver exports a sysfs knob to enable or disable it. There is a file: +/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/boost +which can either read "0" (boosting disabled) or "1" (boosting enabled). +The file is exported only when cpufreq driver supports boosting. +Explicitly changing the permissions and writing to that file anyway will +return EINVAL. + +On supported CPUs one can write either a "0" or a "1" into this file. +This will either disable the boost functionality on all cores in the +whole system (0) or will allow the software or hardware to boost at will +(1). + +Writing a "1" does not explicitly boost the system, but just allows the +CPU to boost at their discretion. Some implementations take external +factors like the chip's temperature into account, so boosting once does +not necessarily mean that it will occur every time even using the exact +same software setup. + + +AMD legacy cpb switch +--------------------- +The AMD powernow-k8 driver used to support a very similar switch to +disable or enable the "Core Performance Boost" feature of some AMD CPUs. +This switch was instantiated in each CPU's cpufreq directory +(/sys/devices/system/cpu[0-9]*/cpufreq) and was called "cpb". +Though the per CPU existence hints at a more fine grained control, the +actual implementation only supported a system-global switch semantics, +which was simply reflected into each CPU's file. Writing a 0 or 1 into it +would pull the other CPUs to the same state. +For compatibility reasons this file and its behavior is still supported +on AMD CPUs, though it is now protected by a config switch +(X86_ACPI_CPUFREQ_CPB). On Intel CPUs this file will never be created, +even with the config option set. +This functionality is considered legacy and will be removed in some future +kernel version. + +More fine grained boosting control +---------------------------------- + +Technically it is possible to switch the boosting functionality at least +on a per package basis, for some CPUs even per core. Currently the driver +does not support it, but this may be implemented in the future. |