diff options
author | 2015-08-04 12:17:53 -0700 | |
---|---|---|
committer | 2015-08-04 15:44:42 -0700 | |
commit | 9ca8dbcc65cfc63d6f5ef3312a33184e1d726e00 (patch) | |
tree | 1c9cafbcd35f783a87880a10f85d1a060db1a563 /kernel/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rm_xics.c | |
parent | 98260f3884f4a202f9ca5eabed40b1354c489b29 (diff) |
Add the rt linux 4.1.3-rt3 as base
Import the rt linux 4.1.3-rt3 as OPNFV kvm base.
It's from git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rt/linux-rt-devel.git linux-4.1.y-rt and
the base is:
commit 0917f823c59692d751951bf5ea699a2d1e2f26a2
Author: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Date: Sat Jul 25 12:13:34 2015 +0200
Prepare v4.1.3-rt3
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
We lose all the git history this way and it's not good. We
should apply another opnfv project repo in future.
Change-Id: I87543d81c9df70d99c5001fbdf646b202c19f423
Signed-off-by: Yunhong Jiang <yunhong.jiang@intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rm_xics.c')
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rm_xics.c | 627 |
1 files changed, 627 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rm_xics.c b/kernel/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rm_xics.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000..00e45b6d4 --- /dev/null +++ b/kernel/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rm_xics.c @@ -0,0 +1,627 @@ +/* + * Copyright 2012 Michael Ellerman, IBM Corporation. + * Copyright 2012 Benjamin Herrenschmidt, IBM Corporation + * + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License, version 2, as + * published by the Free Software Foundation. + */ + +#include <linux/kernel.h> +#include <linux/kvm_host.h> +#include <linux/err.h> + +#include <asm/kvm_book3s.h> +#include <asm/kvm_ppc.h> +#include <asm/hvcall.h> +#include <asm/xics.h> +#include <asm/debug.h> +#include <asm/synch.h> +#include <asm/ppc-opcode.h> + +#include "book3s_xics.h" + +#define DEBUG_PASSUP + +static void icp_rm_deliver_irq(struct kvmppc_xics *xics, struct kvmppc_icp *icp, + u32 new_irq); + +/* -- ICS routines -- */ +static void ics_rm_check_resend(struct kvmppc_xics *xics, + struct kvmppc_ics *ics, struct kvmppc_icp *icp) +{ + int i; + + arch_spin_lock(&ics->lock); + + for (i = 0; i < KVMPPC_XICS_IRQ_PER_ICS; i++) { + struct ics_irq_state *state = &ics->irq_state[i]; + + if (!state->resend) + continue; + + arch_spin_unlock(&ics->lock); + icp_rm_deliver_irq(xics, icp, state->number); + arch_spin_lock(&ics->lock); + } + + arch_spin_unlock(&ics->lock); +} + +/* -- ICP routines -- */ + +static void icp_rm_set_vcpu_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, + struct kvm_vcpu *this_vcpu) +{ + struct kvmppc_icp *this_icp = this_vcpu->arch.icp; + int cpu; + + /* Mark the target VCPU as having an interrupt pending */ + vcpu->stat.queue_intr++; + set_bit(BOOK3S_IRQPRIO_EXTERNAL_LEVEL, &vcpu->arch.pending_exceptions); + + /* Kick self ? Just set MER and return */ + if (vcpu == this_vcpu) { + mtspr(SPRN_LPCR, mfspr(SPRN_LPCR) | LPCR_MER); + return; + } + + /* Check if the core is loaded, if not, too hard */ + cpu = vcpu->cpu; + if (cpu < 0 || cpu >= nr_cpu_ids) { + this_icp->rm_action |= XICS_RM_KICK_VCPU; + this_icp->rm_kick_target = vcpu; + return; + } + /* In SMT cpu will always point to thread 0, we adjust it */ + cpu += vcpu->arch.ptid; + + smp_mb(); + kvmhv_rm_send_ipi(cpu); +} + +static void icp_rm_clr_vcpu_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) +{ + /* Note: Only called on self ! */ + clear_bit(BOOK3S_IRQPRIO_EXTERNAL_LEVEL, + &vcpu->arch.pending_exceptions); + mtspr(SPRN_LPCR, mfspr(SPRN_LPCR) & ~LPCR_MER); +} + +static inline bool icp_rm_try_update(struct kvmppc_icp *icp, + union kvmppc_icp_state old, + union kvmppc_icp_state new) +{ + struct kvm_vcpu *this_vcpu = local_paca->kvm_hstate.kvm_vcpu; + bool success; + + /* Calculate new output value */ + new.out_ee = (new.xisr && (new.pending_pri < new.cppr)); + + /* Attempt atomic update */ + success = cmpxchg64(&icp->state.raw, old.raw, new.raw) == old.raw; + if (!success) + goto bail; + + /* + * Check for output state update + * + * Note that this is racy since another processor could be updating + * the state already. This is why we never clear the interrupt output + * here, we only ever set it. The clear only happens prior to doing + * an update and only by the processor itself. Currently we do it + * in Accept (H_XIRR) and Up_Cppr (H_XPPR). + * + * We also do not try to figure out whether the EE state has changed, + * we unconditionally set it if the new state calls for it. The reason + * for that is that we opportunistically remove the pending interrupt + * flag when raising CPPR, so we need to set it back here if an + * interrupt is still pending. + */ + if (new.out_ee) + icp_rm_set_vcpu_irq(icp->vcpu, this_vcpu); + + /* Expose the state change for debug purposes */ + this_vcpu->arch.icp->rm_dbgstate = new; + this_vcpu->arch.icp->rm_dbgtgt = icp->vcpu; + + bail: + return success; +} + +static inline int check_too_hard(struct kvmppc_xics *xics, + struct kvmppc_icp *icp) +{ + return (xics->real_mode_dbg || icp->rm_action) ? H_TOO_HARD : H_SUCCESS; +} + +static void icp_rm_check_resend(struct kvmppc_xics *xics, + struct kvmppc_icp *icp) +{ + u32 icsid; + + /* Order this load with the test for need_resend in the caller */ + smp_rmb(); + for_each_set_bit(icsid, icp->resend_map, xics->max_icsid + 1) { + struct kvmppc_ics *ics = xics->ics[icsid]; + + if (!test_and_clear_bit(icsid, icp->resend_map)) + continue; + if (!ics) + continue; + ics_rm_check_resend(xics, ics, icp); + } +} + +static bool icp_rm_try_to_deliver(struct kvmppc_icp *icp, u32 irq, u8 priority, + u32 *reject) +{ + union kvmppc_icp_state old_state, new_state; + bool success; + + do { + old_state = new_state = READ_ONCE(icp->state); + + *reject = 0; + + /* See if we can deliver */ + success = new_state.cppr > priority && + new_state.mfrr > priority && + new_state.pending_pri > priority; + + /* + * If we can, check for a rejection and perform the + * delivery + */ + if (success) { + *reject = new_state.xisr; + new_state.xisr = irq; + new_state.pending_pri = priority; + } else { + /* + * If we failed to deliver we set need_resend + * so a subsequent CPPR state change causes us + * to try a new delivery. + */ + new_state.need_resend = true; + } + + } while (!icp_rm_try_update(icp, old_state, new_state)); + + return success; +} + +static void icp_rm_deliver_irq(struct kvmppc_xics *xics, struct kvmppc_icp *icp, + u32 new_irq) +{ + struct ics_irq_state *state; + struct kvmppc_ics *ics; + u32 reject; + u16 src; + + /* + * This is used both for initial delivery of an interrupt and + * for subsequent rejection. + * + * Rejection can be racy vs. resends. We have evaluated the + * rejection in an atomic ICP transaction which is now complete, + * so potentially the ICP can already accept the interrupt again. + * + * So we need to retry the delivery. Essentially the reject path + * boils down to a failed delivery. Always. + * + * Now the interrupt could also have moved to a different target, + * thus we may need to re-do the ICP lookup as well + */ + + again: + /* Get the ICS state and lock it */ + ics = kvmppc_xics_find_ics(xics, new_irq, &src); + if (!ics) { + /* Unsafe increment, but this does not need to be accurate */ + xics->err_noics++; + return; + } + state = &ics->irq_state[src]; + + /* Get a lock on the ICS */ + arch_spin_lock(&ics->lock); + + /* Get our server */ + if (!icp || state->server != icp->server_num) { + icp = kvmppc_xics_find_server(xics->kvm, state->server); + if (!icp) { + /* Unsafe increment again*/ + xics->err_noicp++; + goto out; + } + } + + /* Clear the resend bit of that interrupt */ + state->resend = 0; + + /* + * If masked, bail out + * + * Note: PAPR doesn't mention anything about masked pending + * when doing a resend, only when doing a delivery. + * + * However that would have the effect of losing a masked + * interrupt that was rejected and isn't consistent with + * the whole masked_pending business which is about not + * losing interrupts that occur while masked. + * + * I don't differentiate normal deliveries and resends, this + * implementation will differ from PAPR and not lose such + * interrupts. + */ + if (state->priority == MASKED) { + state->masked_pending = 1; + goto out; + } + + /* + * Try the delivery, this will set the need_resend flag + * in the ICP as part of the atomic transaction if the + * delivery is not possible. + * + * Note that if successful, the new delivery might have itself + * rejected an interrupt that was "delivered" before we took the + * ics spin lock. + * + * In this case we do the whole sequence all over again for the + * new guy. We cannot assume that the rejected interrupt is less + * favored than the new one, and thus doesn't need to be delivered, + * because by the time we exit icp_rm_try_to_deliver() the target + * processor may well have already consumed & completed it, and thus + * the rejected interrupt might actually be already acceptable. + */ + if (icp_rm_try_to_deliver(icp, new_irq, state->priority, &reject)) { + /* + * Delivery was successful, did we reject somebody else ? + */ + if (reject && reject != XICS_IPI) { + arch_spin_unlock(&ics->lock); + new_irq = reject; + goto again; + } + } else { + /* + * We failed to deliver the interrupt we need to set the + * resend map bit and mark the ICS state as needing a resend + */ + set_bit(ics->icsid, icp->resend_map); + state->resend = 1; + + /* + * If the need_resend flag got cleared in the ICP some time + * between icp_rm_try_to_deliver() atomic update and now, then + * we know it might have missed the resend_map bit. So we + * retry + */ + smp_mb(); + if (!icp->state.need_resend) { + arch_spin_unlock(&ics->lock); + goto again; + } + } + out: + arch_spin_unlock(&ics->lock); +} + +static void icp_rm_down_cppr(struct kvmppc_xics *xics, struct kvmppc_icp *icp, + u8 new_cppr) +{ + union kvmppc_icp_state old_state, new_state; + bool resend; + + /* + * This handles several related states in one operation: + * + * ICP State: Down_CPPR + * + * Load CPPR with new value and if the XISR is 0 + * then check for resends: + * + * ICP State: Resend + * + * If MFRR is more favored than CPPR, check for IPIs + * and notify ICS of a potential resend. This is done + * asynchronously (when used in real mode, we will have + * to exit here). + * + * We do not handle the complete Check_IPI as documented + * here. In the PAPR, this state will be used for both + * Set_MFRR and Down_CPPR. However, we know that we aren't + * changing the MFRR state here so we don't need to handle + * the case of an MFRR causing a reject of a pending irq, + * this will have been handled when the MFRR was set in the + * first place. + * + * Thus we don't have to handle rejects, only resends. + * + * When implementing real mode for HV KVM, resend will lead to + * a H_TOO_HARD return and the whole transaction will be handled + * in virtual mode. + */ + do { + old_state = new_state = READ_ONCE(icp->state); + + /* Down_CPPR */ + new_state.cppr = new_cppr; + + /* + * Cut down Resend / Check_IPI / IPI + * + * The logic is that we cannot have a pending interrupt + * trumped by an IPI at this point (see above), so we + * know that either the pending interrupt is already an + * IPI (in which case we don't care to override it) or + * it's either more favored than us or non existent + */ + if (new_state.mfrr < new_cppr && + new_state.mfrr <= new_state.pending_pri) { + new_state.pending_pri = new_state.mfrr; + new_state.xisr = XICS_IPI; + } + + /* Latch/clear resend bit */ + resend = new_state.need_resend; + new_state.need_resend = 0; + + } while (!icp_rm_try_update(icp, old_state, new_state)); + + /* + * Now handle resend checks. Those are asynchronous to the ICP + * state update in HW (ie bus transactions) so we can handle them + * separately here as well. + */ + if (resend) { + icp->n_check_resend++; + icp_rm_check_resend(xics, icp); + } +} + + +unsigned long kvmppc_rm_h_xirr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) +{ + union kvmppc_icp_state old_state, new_state; + struct kvmppc_xics *xics = vcpu->kvm->arch.xics; + struct kvmppc_icp *icp = vcpu->arch.icp; + u32 xirr; + + if (!xics || !xics->real_mode) + return H_TOO_HARD; + + /* First clear the interrupt */ + icp_rm_clr_vcpu_irq(icp->vcpu); + + /* + * ICP State: Accept_Interrupt + * + * Return the pending interrupt (if any) along with the + * current CPPR, then clear the XISR & set CPPR to the + * pending priority + */ + do { + old_state = new_state = READ_ONCE(icp->state); + + xirr = old_state.xisr | (((u32)old_state.cppr) << 24); + if (!old_state.xisr) + break; + new_state.cppr = new_state.pending_pri; + new_state.pending_pri = 0xff; + new_state.xisr = 0; + + } while (!icp_rm_try_update(icp, old_state, new_state)); + + /* Return the result in GPR4 */ + vcpu->arch.gpr[4] = xirr; + + return check_too_hard(xics, icp); +} + +int kvmppc_rm_h_ipi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long server, + unsigned long mfrr) +{ + union kvmppc_icp_state old_state, new_state; + struct kvmppc_xics *xics = vcpu->kvm->arch.xics; + struct kvmppc_icp *icp, *this_icp = vcpu->arch.icp; + u32 reject; + bool resend; + bool local; + + if (!xics || !xics->real_mode) + return H_TOO_HARD; + + local = this_icp->server_num == server; + if (local) + icp = this_icp; + else + icp = kvmppc_xics_find_server(vcpu->kvm, server); + if (!icp) + return H_PARAMETER; + + /* + * ICP state: Set_MFRR + * + * If the CPPR is more favored than the new MFRR, then + * nothing needs to be done as there can be no XISR to + * reject. + * + * ICP state: Check_IPI + * + * If the CPPR is less favored, then we might be replacing + * an interrupt, and thus need to possibly reject it. + * + * ICP State: IPI + * + * Besides rejecting any pending interrupts, we also + * update XISR and pending_pri to mark IPI as pending. + * + * PAPR does not describe this state, but if the MFRR is being + * made less favored than its earlier value, there might be + * a previously-rejected interrupt needing to be resent. + * Ideally, we would want to resend only if + * prio(pending_interrupt) < mfrr && + * prio(pending_interrupt) < cppr + * where pending interrupt is the one that was rejected. But + * we don't have that state, so we simply trigger a resend + * whenever the MFRR is made less favored. + */ + do { + old_state = new_state = READ_ONCE(icp->state); + + /* Set_MFRR */ + new_state.mfrr = mfrr; + + /* Check_IPI */ + reject = 0; + resend = false; + if (mfrr < new_state.cppr) { + /* Reject a pending interrupt if not an IPI */ + if (mfrr <= new_state.pending_pri) { + reject = new_state.xisr; + new_state.pending_pri = mfrr; + new_state.xisr = XICS_IPI; + } + } + + if (mfrr > old_state.mfrr) { + resend = new_state.need_resend; + new_state.need_resend = 0; + } + } while (!icp_rm_try_update(icp, old_state, new_state)); + + /* Handle reject in real mode */ + if (reject && reject != XICS_IPI) { + this_icp->n_reject++; + icp_rm_deliver_irq(xics, icp, reject); + } + + /* Handle resends in real mode */ + if (resend) { + this_icp->n_check_resend++; + icp_rm_check_resend(xics, icp); + } + + return check_too_hard(xics, this_icp); +} + +int kvmppc_rm_h_cppr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long cppr) +{ + union kvmppc_icp_state old_state, new_state; + struct kvmppc_xics *xics = vcpu->kvm->arch.xics; + struct kvmppc_icp *icp = vcpu->arch.icp; + u32 reject; + + if (!xics || !xics->real_mode) + return H_TOO_HARD; + + /* + * ICP State: Set_CPPR + * + * We can safely compare the new value with the current + * value outside of the transaction as the CPPR is only + * ever changed by the processor on itself + */ + if (cppr > icp->state.cppr) { + icp_rm_down_cppr(xics, icp, cppr); + goto bail; + } else if (cppr == icp->state.cppr) + return H_SUCCESS; + + /* + * ICP State: Up_CPPR + * + * The processor is raising its priority, this can result + * in a rejection of a pending interrupt: + * + * ICP State: Reject_Current + * + * We can remove EE from the current processor, the update + * transaction will set it again if needed + */ + icp_rm_clr_vcpu_irq(icp->vcpu); + + do { + old_state = new_state = READ_ONCE(icp->state); + + reject = 0; + new_state.cppr = cppr; + + if (cppr <= new_state.pending_pri) { + reject = new_state.xisr; + new_state.xisr = 0; + new_state.pending_pri = 0xff; + } + + } while (!icp_rm_try_update(icp, old_state, new_state)); + + /* + * Check for rejects. They are handled by doing a new delivery + * attempt (see comments in icp_rm_deliver_irq). + */ + if (reject && reject != XICS_IPI) { + icp->n_reject++; + icp_rm_deliver_irq(xics, icp, reject); + } + bail: + return check_too_hard(xics, icp); +} + +int kvmppc_rm_h_eoi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long xirr) +{ + struct kvmppc_xics *xics = vcpu->kvm->arch.xics; + struct kvmppc_icp *icp = vcpu->arch.icp; + struct kvmppc_ics *ics; + struct ics_irq_state *state; + u32 irq = xirr & 0x00ffffff; + u16 src; + + if (!xics || !xics->real_mode) + return H_TOO_HARD; + + /* + * ICP State: EOI + * + * Note: If EOI is incorrectly used by SW to lower the CPPR + * value (ie more favored), we do not check for rejection of + * a pending interrupt, this is a SW error and PAPR sepcifies + * that we don't have to deal with it. + * + * The sending of an EOI to the ICS is handled after the + * CPPR update + * + * ICP State: Down_CPPR which we handle + * in a separate function as it's shared with H_CPPR. + */ + icp_rm_down_cppr(xics, icp, xirr >> 24); + + /* IPIs have no EOI */ + if (irq == XICS_IPI) + goto bail; + /* + * EOI handling: If the interrupt is still asserted, we need to + * resend it. We can take a lockless "peek" at the ICS state here. + * + * "Message" interrupts will never have "asserted" set + */ + ics = kvmppc_xics_find_ics(xics, irq, &src); + if (!ics) + goto bail; + state = &ics->irq_state[src]; + + /* Still asserted, resend it */ + if (state->asserted) { + icp->n_reject++; + icp_rm_deliver_irq(xics, icp, irq); + } + + if (!hlist_empty(&vcpu->kvm->irq_ack_notifier_list)) { + icp->rm_action |= XICS_RM_NOTIFY_EOI; + icp->rm_eoied_irq = irq; + } + bail: + return check_too_hard(xics, icp); +} |