summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/kernel/arch/arc/include/asm/spinlock.h
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorYunhong Jiang <yunhong.jiang@intel.com>2015-08-04 12:17:53 -0700
committerYunhong Jiang <yunhong.jiang@intel.com>2015-08-04 15:44:42 -0700
commit9ca8dbcc65cfc63d6f5ef3312a33184e1d726e00 (patch)
tree1c9cafbcd35f783a87880a10f85d1a060db1a563 /kernel/arch/arc/include/asm/spinlock.h
parent98260f3884f4a202f9ca5eabed40b1354c489b29 (diff)
Add the rt linux 4.1.3-rt3 as base
Import the rt linux 4.1.3-rt3 as OPNFV kvm base. It's from git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rt/linux-rt-devel.git linux-4.1.y-rt and the base is: commit 0917f823c59692d751951bf5ea699a2d1e2f26a2 Author: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Date: Sat Jul 25 12:13:34 2015 +0200 Prepare v4.1.3-rt3 Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> We lose all the git history this way and it's not good. We should apply another opnfv project repo in future. Change-Id: I87543d81c9df70d99c5001fbdf646b202c19f423 Signed-off-by: Yunhong Jiang <yunhong.jiang@intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/arch/arc/include/asm/spinlock.h')
-rw-r--r--kernel/arch/arc/include/asm/spinlock.h183
1 files changed, 183 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/arch/arc/include/asm/spinlock.h b/kernel/arch/arc/include/asm/spinlock.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..e1651df6a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/kernel/arch/arc/include/asm/spinlock.h
@@ -0,0 +1,183 @@
+/*
+ * Copyright (C) 2004, 2007-2010, 2011-2012 Synopsys, Inc. (www.synopsys.com)
+ *
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+ * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
+ * published by the Free Software Foundation.
+ */
+
+#ifndef __ASM_SPINLOCK_H
+#define __ASM_SPINLOCK_H
+
+#include <asm/spinlock_types.h>
+#include <asm/processor.h>
+#include <asm/barrier.h>
+
+#define arch_spin_is_locked(x) ((x)->slock != __ARCH_SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED__)
+#define arch_spin_lock_flags(lock, flags) arch_spin_lock(lock)
+#define arch_spin_unlock_wait(x) \
+ do { while (arch_spin_is_locked(x)) cpu_relax(); } while (0)
+
+static inline void arch_spin_lock(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
+{
+ unsigned int tmp = __ARCH_SPIN_LOCK_LOCKED__;
+
+ /*
+ * This smp_mb() is technically superfluous, we only need the one
+ * after the lock for providing the ACQUIRE semantics.
+ * However doing the "right" thing was regressing hackbench
+ * so keeping this, pending further investigation
+ */
+ smp_mb();
+
+ __asm__ __volatile__(
+ "1: ex %0, [%1] \n"
+ " breq %0, %2, 1b \n"
+ : "+&r" (tmp)
+ : "r"(&(lock->slock)), "ir"(__ARCH_SPIN_LOCK_LOCKED__)
+ : "memory");
+
+ /*
+ * ACQUIRE barrier to ensure load/store after taking the lock
+ * don't "bleed-up" out of the critical section (leak-in is allowed)
+ * http://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg2010409.html
+ *
+ * ARCv2 only has load-load, store-store and all-all barrier
+ * thus need the full all-all barrier
+ */
+ smp_mb();
+}
+
+static inline int arch_spin_trylock(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
+{
+ unsigned int tmp = __ARCH_SPIN_LOCK_LOCKED__;
+
+ smp_mb();
+
+ __asm__ __volatile__(
+ "1: ex %0, [%1] \n"
+ : "+r" (tmp)
+ : "r"(&(lock->slock))
+ : "memory");
+
+ smp_mb();
+
+ return (tmp == __ARCH_SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED__);
+}
+
+static inline void arch_spin_unlock(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
+{
+ unsigned int tmp = __ARCH_SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED__;
+
+ /*
+ * RELEASE barrier: given the instructions avail on ARCv2, full barrier
+ * is the only option
+ */
+ smp_mb();
+
+ __asm__ __volatile__(
+ " ex %0, [%1] \n"
+ : "+r" (tmp)
+ : "r"(&(lock->slock))
+ : "memory");
+
+ /*
+ * superfluous, but keeping for now - see pairing version in
+ * arch_spin_lock above
+ */
+ smp_mb();
+}
+
+/*
+ * Read-write spinlocks, allowing multiple readers but only one writer.
+ *
+ * The spinlock itself is contained in @counter and access to it is
+ * serialized with @lock_mutex.
+ *
+ * Unfair locking as Writers could be starved indefinitely by Reader(s)
+ */
+
+/* Would read_trylock() succeed? */
+#define arch_read_can_lock(x) ((x)->counter > 0)
+
+/* Would write_trylock() succeed? */
+#define arch_write_can_lock(x) ((x)->counter == __ARCH_RW_LOCK_UNLOCKED__)
+
+/* 1 - lock taken successfully */
+static inline int arch_read_trylock(arch_rwlock_t *rw)
+{
+ int ret = 0;
+
+ arch_spin_lock(&(rw->lock_mutex));
+
+ /*
+ * zero means writer holds the lock exclusively, deny Reader.
+ * Otherwise grant lock to first/subseq reader
+ */
+ if (rw->counter > 0) {
+ rw->counter--;
+ ret = 1;
+ }
+
+ arch_spin_unlock(&(rw->lock_mutex));
+
+ smp_mb();
+ return ret;
+}
+
+/* 1 - lock taken successfully */
+static inline int arch_write_trylock(arch_rwlock_t *rw)
+{
+ int ret = 0;
+
+ arch_spin_lock(&(rw->lock_mutex));
+
+ /*
+ * If reader(s) hold lock (lock < __ARCH_RW_LOCK_UNLOCKED__),
+ * deny writer. Otherwise if unlocked grant to writer
+ * Hence the claim that Linux rwlocks are unfair to writers.
+ * (can be starved for an indefinite time by readers).
+ */
+ if (rw->counter == __ARCH_RW_LOCK_UNLOCKED__) {
+ rw->counter = 0;
+ ret = 1;
+ }
+ arch_spin_unlock(&(rw->lock_mutex));
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static inline void arch_read_lock(arch_rwlock_t *rw)
+{
+ while (!arch_read_trylock(rw))
+ cpu_relax();
+}
+
+static inline void arch_write_lock(arch_rwlock_t *rw)
+{
+ while (!arch_write_trylock(rw))
+ cpu_relax();
+}
+
+static inline void arch_read_unlock(arch_rwlock_t *rw)
+{
+ arch_spin_lock(&(rw->lock_mutex));
+ rw->counter++;
+ arch_spin_unlock(&(rw->lock_mutex));
+}
+
+static inline void arch_write_unlock(arch_rwlock_t *rw)
+{
+ arch_spin_lock(&(rw->lock_mutex));
+ rw->counter = __ARCH_RW_LOCK_UNLOCKED__;
+ arch_spin_unlock(&(rw->lock_mutex));
+}
+
+#define arch_read_lock_flags(lock, flags) arch_read_lock(lock)
+#define arch_write_lock_flags(lock, flags) arch_write_lock(lock)
+
+#define arch_spin_relax(lock) cpu_relax()
+#define arch_read_relax(lock) cpu_relax()
+#define arch_write_relax(lock) cpu_relax()
+
+#endif /* __ASM_SPINLOCK_H */