These changes are the raw update to linux-4.4.6-rt14. Kernel sources

are taken from kernel.org, and rt patch from the rt wiki download page.

During the rebasing, the following patch collided:

Force tick interrupt and get rid of softirq magic(I70131fb85).

Collisions have been removed because its logic was found on the
source already.

Change-Id: I7f57a4081d9deaa0d9ccfc41a6c8daccdee3b769
Signed-off-by: José Pekkarinen <jose.pekkarinen@nokia.com>

1 files changed, 16 insertions, 16 deletions

diff --git a/kernel/Documentation/powerpc/transactional_memory.txt b/kernel/Documentation/powerpc/transactional_memory.txt
index ded69794a..ba0a2a4a5 100644
--- a/kernel/Documentation/powerpc/transactional_memory.txt
+++ b/kernel/Documentation/powerpc/transactional_memory.txt
@@ -74,22 +74,23 @@ Causes of transaction aborts
 Syscalls
 ========
 
-Performing syscalls from within transaction is not recommended, and can lead
-to unpredictable results.
+Syscalls made from within an active transaction will not be performed and the
+transaction will be doomed by the kernel with the failure code TM_CAUSE_SYSCALL
+| TM_CAUSE_PERSISTENT.
 
-Syscalls do not by design abort transactions, but beware: The kernel code will
-not be running in transactional state.  The effect of syscalls will always
-remain visible, but depending on the call they may abort your transaction as a
-side-effect, read soon-to-be-aborted transactional data that should not remain
-invisible, etc.  If you constantly retry a transaction that constantly aborts
-itself by calling a syscall, you'll have a livelock & make no progress.
+Syscalls made from within a suspended transaction are performed as normal and
+the transaction is not explicitly doomed by the kernel.  However, what the
+kernel does to perform the syscall may result in the transaction being doomed
+by the hardware.  The syscall is performed in suspended mode so any side
+effects will be persistent, independent of transaction success or failure.  No
+guarantees are provided by the kernel about which syscalls will affect
+transaction success.
 
-Simple syscalls (e.g. sigprocmask()) "could" be OK.  Even things like write()
-from, say, printf() should be OK as long as the kernel does not access any
-memory that was accessed transactionally.
-
-Consider any syscalls that happen to work as debug-only -- not recommended for
-production use.  Best to queue them up till after the transaction is over.
+Care must be taken when relying on syscalls to abort during active transactions
+if the calls are made via a library.  Libraries may cache values (which may
+give the appearance of success) or perform operations that cause transaction
+failure before entering the kernel (which may produce different failure codes).
+Examples are glibc's getpid() and lazy symbol resolution.
 
 
 Signals
@@ -176,8 +177,7 @@ kernel aborted a transaction:
  TM_CAUSE_RESCHED       Thread was rescheduled.
  TM_CAUSE_TLBI          Software TLB invalid.
  TM_CAUSE_FAC_UNAV      FP/VEC/VSX unavailable trap.
- TM_CAUSE_SYSCALL       Currently unused; future syscalls that must abort
-                        transactions for consistency will use this.
+ TM_CAUSE_SYSCALL       Syscall from active transaction.
  TM_CAUSE_SIGNAL        Signal delivered.
  TM_CAUSE_MISC          Currently unused.
  TM_CAUSE_ALIGNMENT     Alignment fault.