These changes are the raw update to linux-4.4.6-rt14. Kernel sources

are taken from kernel.org, and rt patch from the rt wiki download page.

During the rebasing, the following patch collided:

Force tick interrupt and get rid of softirq magic(I70131fb85).

Collisions have been removed because its logic was found on the
source already.

Change-Id: I7f57a4081d9deaa0d9ccfc41a6c8daccdee3b769
Signed-off-by: José Pekkarinen <jose.pekkarinen@nokia.com>

1 files changed, 217 insertions, 31 deletions

diff --git a/kernel/Documentation/cgroups/unified-hierarchy.txt b/kernel/Documentation/cgroups/unified-hierarchy.txt
index eb102fb72..781b1d475 100644
--- a/kernel/Documentation/cgroups/unified-hierarchy.txt
+++ b/kernel/Documentation/cgroups/unified-hierarchy.txt
@@ -17,15 +17,21 @@ CONTENTS
 3. Structural Constraints
   3-1. Top-down
   3-2. No internal tasks
-4. Other Changes
-  4-1. [Un]populated Notification
-  4-2. Other Core Changes
-  4-3. Per-Controller Changes
-    4-3-1. blkio
-    4-3-2. cpuset
-    4-3-3. memory
-5. Planned Changes
-  5-1. CAP for resource control
+4. Delegation
+  4-1. Model of delegation
+  4-2. Common ancestor rule
+5. Other Changes
+  5-1. [Un]populated Notification
+  5-2. Other Core Changes
+  5-3. Controller File Conventions
+    5-3-1. Format
+    5-3-2. Control Knobs
+  5-4. Per-Controller Changes
+    5-4-1. io
+    5-4-2. cpuset
+    5-4-3. memory
+6. Planned Changes
+  6-1. CAP for resource control
 
 
 1. Background
@@ -101,12 +107,6 @@ root of unified hierarchy can be bound to other hierarchies.  This
 allows mixing unified hierarchy with the traditional multiple
 hierarchies in a fully backward compatible way.
 
-For development purposes, the following boot parameter makes all
-controllers to appear on the unified hierarchy whether supported or
-not.
-
- cgroup__DEVEL__legacy_files_on_dfl
-
 A controller can be moved across hierarchies only after the controller
 is no longer referenced in its current hierarchy.  Because per-cgroup
 controller states are destroyed asynchronously and controllers may
@@ -197,7 +197,7 @@ other issues.  The mapping from nice level to weight isn't obvious or
 universal, and there are various other knobs which simply aren't
 available for tasks.
 
-The blkio controller implicitly creates a hidden leaf node for each
+The io controller implicitly creates a hidden leaf node for each
 cgroup to host the tasks.  The hidden leaf has its own copies of all
 the knobs with "leaf_" prefixed.  While this allows equivalent control
 over internal tasks, it's with serious drawbacks.  It always adds an
@@ -245,9 +245,72 @@ cgroup must create children and transfer all its tasks to the children
 before enabling controllers in its "cgroup.subtree_control" file.
 
 
-4. Other Changes
+4. Delegation
+
+4-1. Model of delegation
+
+A cgroup can be delegated to a less privileged user by granting write
+access of the directory and its "cgroup.procs" file to the user.  Note
+that the resource control knobs in a given directory concern the
+resources of the parent and thus must not be delegated along with the
+directory.
+
+Once delegated, the user can build sub-hierarchy under the directory,
+organize processes as it sees fit and further distribute the resources
+it got from the parent.  The limits and other settings of all resource
+controllers are hierarchical and regardless of what happens in the
+delegated sub-hierarchy, nothing can escape the resource restrictions
+imposed by the parent.
+
+Currently, cgroup doesn't impose any restrictions on the number of
+cgroups in or nesting depth of a delegated sub-hierarchy; however,
+this may in the future be limited explicitly.
+
+
+4-2. Common ancestor rule
+
+On the unified hierarchy, to write to a "cgroup.procs" file, in
+addition to the usual write permission to the file and uid match, the
+writer must also have write access to the "cgroup.procs" file of the
+common ancestor of the source and destination cgroups.  This prevents
+delegatees from smuggling processes across disjoint sub-hierarchies.
+
+Let's say cgroups C0 and C1 have been delegated to user U0 who created
+C00, C01 under C0 and C10 under C1 as follows.
+
+ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ - C0 - C00
+ ~ cgroup    ~      \ C01
+ ~ hierarchy ~
+ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ - C1 - C10
+
+C0 and C1 are separate entities in terms of resource distribution
+regardless of their relative positions in the hierarchy.  The
+resources the processes under C0 are entitled to are controlled by
+C0's ancestors and may be completely different from C1.  It's clear
+that the intention of delegating C0 to U0 is allowing U0 to organize
+the processes under C0 and further control the distribution of C0's
+resources.
+
+On traditional hierarchies, if a task has write access to "tasks" or
+"cgroup.procs" file of a cgroup and its uid agrees with the target, it
+can move the target to the cgroup.  In the above example, U0 will not
+only be able to move processes in each sub-hierarchy but also across
+the two sub-hierarchies, effectively allowing it to violate the
+organizational and resource restrictions implied by the hierarchical
+structure above C0 and C1.
+
+On the unified hierarchy, let's say U0 wants to write the pid of a
+process which has a matching uid and is currently in C10 into
+"C00/cgroup.procs".  U0 obviously has write access to the file and
+migration permission on the process; however, the common ancestor of
+the source cgroup C10 and the destination cgroup C00 is above the
+points of delegation and U0 would not have write access to its
+"cgroup.procs" and thus be denied with -EACCES.
 
-4-1. [Un]populated Notification
+
+5. Other Changes
+
+5-1. [Un]populated Notification
 
 cgroup users often need a way to determine when a cgroup's
 subhierarchy becomes empty so that it can be cleaned up.  cgroup
@@ -272,11 +335,11 @@ is riddled with issues.
   unnecessarily complicated and probably done this way because event
   delivery itself was expensive.
 
-Unified hierarchy implements an interface file "cgroup.populated"
-which can be used to monitor whether the cgroup's subhierarchy has
-tasks in it or not.  Its value is 0 if there is no task in the cgroup
-and its descendants; otherwise, 1.  poll and [id]notify events are
-triggered when the value changes.
+Unified hierarchy implements "populated" field in "cgroup.events"
+interface file which can be used to monitor whether the cgroup's
+subhierarchy has tasks in it or not.  Its value is 0 if there is no
+task in the cgroup and its descendants; otherwise, 1.  poll and
+[id]notify events are triggered when the value changes.
 
 This is significantly lighter and simpler and trivially allows
 delegating management of subhierarchy - subhierarchy monitoring can
@@ -289,7 +352,7 @@ supported and the interface files "release_agent" and
 "notify_on_release" do not exist.
 
 
-4-2. Other Core Changes
+5-2. Other Core Changes
 
 - None of the mount options is allowed.
 
@@ -305,15 +368,138 @@ supported and the interface files "release_agent" and
 
 - The "cgroup.clone_children" file is removed.
 
+- /proc/PID/cgroup keeps reporting the cgroup that a zombie belonged
+  to before exiting.  If the cgroup is removed before the zombie is
+  reaped, " (deleted)" is appeneded to the path.
+
+
+5-3. Controller File Conventions
+
+5-3-1. Format
+
+In general, all controller files should be in one of the following
+formats whenever possible.
+
+- Values only files
+
+  VAL0 VAL1...\n
+
+- Flat keyed files
+
+  KEY0 VAL0\n
+  KEY1 VAL1\n
+  ...
+
+- Nested keyed files
+
+  KEY0 SUB_KEY0=VAL00 SUB_KEY1=VAL01...
+  KEY1 SUB_KEY0=VAL10 SUB_KEY1=VAL11...
+  ...
+
+For a writeable file, the format for writing should generally match
+reading; however, controllers may allow omitting later fields or
+implement restricted shortcuts for most common use cases.
+
+For both flat and nested keyed files, only the values for a single key
+can be written at a time.  For nested keyed files, the sub key pairs
+may be specified in any order and not all pairs have to be specified.
+
+
+5-3-2. Control Knobs
+
+- Settings for a single feature should generally be implemented in a
+  single file.
+
+- In general, the root cgroup should be exempt from resource control
+  and thus shouldn't have resource control knobs.
+
+- If a controller implements ratio based resource distribution, the
+  control knob should be named "weight" and have the range [1, 10000]
+  and 100 should be the default value.  The values are chosen to allow
+  enough and symmetric bias in both directions while keeping it
+  intuitive (the default is 100%).
+
+- If a controller implements an absolute resource guarantee and/or
+  limit, the control knobs should be named "min" and "max"
+  respectively.  If a controller implements best effort resource
+  gurantee and/or limit, the control knobs should be named "low" and
+  "high" respectively.
+
+  In the above four control files, the special token "max" should be
+  used to represent upward infinity for both reading and writing.
+
+- If a setting has configurable default value and specific overrides,
+  the default settings should be keyed with "default" and appear as
+  the first entry in the file.  Specific entries can use "default" as
+  its value to indicate inheritance of the default value.
+
+- For events which are not very high frequency, an interface file
+  "events" should be created which lists event key value pairs.
+  Whenever a notifiable event happens, file modified event should be
+  generated on the file.
+
+
+5-4. Per-Controller Changes
+
+5-4-1. io
+
+- blkio is renamed to io.  The interface is overhauled anyway.  The
+  new name is more in line with the other two major controllers, cpu
+  and memory, and better suited given that it may be used for cgroup
+  writeback without involving block layer.
+
+- Everything including stat is always hierarchical making separate
+  recursive stat files pointless and, as no internal node can have
+  tasks, leaf weights are meaningless.  The operation model is
+  simplified and the interface is overhauled accordingly.
+
+  io.stat
+
+	The stat file.  The reported stats are from the point where
+	bio's are issued to request_queue.  The stats are counted
+	independent of which policies are enabled.  Each line in the
+	file follows the following format.  More fields may later be
+	added at the end.
+
+	  $MAJ:$MIN rbytes=$RBYTES wbytes=$WBYTES rios=$RIOS wrios=$WIOS
+
+  io.weight
+
+	The weight setting, currently only available and effective if
+	cfq-iosched is in use for the target device.  The weight is
+	between 1 and 10000 and defaults to 100.  The first line
+	always contains the default weight in the following format to
+	use when per-device setting is missing.
+
+	  default $WEIGHT
+
+	Subsequent lines list per-device weights of the following
+	format.
+
+	  $MAJ:$MIN $WEIGHT
+
+	Writing "$WEIGHT" or "default $WEIGHT" changes the default
+	setting.  Writing "$MAJ:$MIN $WEIGHT" sets per-device weight
+	while "$MAJ:$MIN default" clears it.
+
+	This file is available only on non-root cgroups.
+
+  io.max
+
+	The maximum bandwidth and/or iops setting, only available if
+	blk-throttle is enabled.  The file is of the following format.
 
-4-3. Per-Controller Changes
+	  $MAJ:$MIN rbps=$RBPS wbps=$WBPS riops=$RIOPS wiops=$WIOPS
 
-4-3-1. blkio
+	${R|W}BPS are read/write bytes per second and ${R|W}IOPS are
+	read/write IOs per second.  "max" indicates no limit.  Writing
+	to the file follows the same format but the individual
+	settings may be omitted or specified in any order.
 
-- blk-throttle becomes properly hierarchical.
+	This file is available only on non-root cgroups.
 
 
-4-3-2. cpuset
+5-4-2. cpuset
 
 - Tasks are kept in empty cpusets after hotplug and take on the masks
   of the nearest non-empty ancestor, instead of being moved to it.
@@ -322,7 +508,7 @@ supported and the interface files "release_agent" and
   masks of the nearest non-empty ancestor.
 
 
-4-3-3. memory
+5-4-3. memory
 
 - use_hierarchy is on by default and the cgroup file for the flag is
   not created.
@@ -407,9 +593,9 @@ supported and the interface files "release_agent" and
   memory.low, memory.high, and memory.max will use the string "max" to
   indicate and set the highest possible value.
 
-5. Planned Changes
+6. Planned Changes
 
-5-1. CAP for resource control
+6-1. CAP for resource control
 
 Unified hierarchy will require one of the capabilities(7), which is
 yet to be decided, for all resource control related knobs.  Process