diff options
author | kalyanreddy <reddyx.gundarapu@intel.com> | 2017-03-28 11:34:11 +0530 |
---|---|---|
committer | kalyanreddy <reddyx.gundarapu@intel.com> | 2017-03-28 11:35:49 +0530 |
commit | f1f3cc27f23bdde81c37d8142d4288d811bd5e45 (patch) | |
tree | 28aeabc93b7aed199fc123738d65d8f390a19a86 /docs/development/design/kvmfornfv_design.rst | |
parent | 1f4ef5ee33f715c03a85a868f12e89744f889cff (diff) |
Update documentation structure.
This patch is used to update documentation structure.
Change-Id: I50d4ef4256ccfc57a0434123e7532a50000582cf
Co-Authored by:Srinivas <srinivas.atmakuri@tcs.com>
Co-Authored by:RajithaY<rajithax.yerrumsetty@intel.com>
Co-Authored by:shravani paladugula <shravanix.paladugula@intel.com>
Co-Authored by:Navya Bathula <navyax.bathula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Gundarapu Kalyan Reddy <reddyx.gundarapu@intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'docs/development/design/kvmfornfv_design.rst')
-rw-r--r-- | docs/development/design/kvmfornfv_design.rst | 136 |
1 files changed, 136 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/docs/development/design/kvmfornfv_design.rst b/docs/development/design/kvmfornfv_design.rst new file mode 100644 index 000000000..765f41219 --- /dev/null +++ b/docs/development/design/kvmfornfv_design.rst @@ -0,0 +1,136 @@ +.. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. +.. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 + +========================== +KVM4NFV design description +========================== + +This design focuses on the enhancement of following area for KVM Hypervisor + +* Minimal Interrupt latency variation for data plane VNFs: + * Minimal Timing Variation for Timing correctness of real-time VNFs + * Minimal packet latency variation for data-plane VNFs +* Fast live migration + +**Minimal Interrupt latency variation for data plane VNFs** + +Processing performance and latency depend on a number of factors, including +the CPUs (frequency, power management features, etc.), micro-architectural +resources, the cache hierarchy and sizes, memory (and hierarchy, such as NUMA) +and speed, inter-connects, I/O and I/O NUMA, devices, etc. + +There are two separate types of latencies to minimize: + + 1. Minimal Timing Variation for Timing correctness of real-time + VNFs – timing correctness for scheduling operations(such as Radio scheduling) + 2. Minimal packet latency variation for data-plane VNFs – packet delay + variation, which applies to packet processing. + +For a VM, interrupt latency (time between arrival of H/W interrupt and +invocation of the interrupt handler in the VM), for example, can be either of +the above or both, depending on the type of the device. Interrupt latency with +a (virtual) timer can cause timing correctness issues with real-time VNFs even +if they only use polling for packet processing. + +We assume that the VNFs are implemented properly to minimize interrupt latency +variation within the VMs, but we have additional causes of latency variation +on KVM: + + - Asynchronous (e.g. external interrupts) and synchronous(e.g. instructions) + VM exits and handling in KVM (and kernel routines called), which may have + loops and spin locks + - Interrupt handling in the host Linux and KVM, scheduling and virtual + interrupt delivery to VNFs + - Potential VM exit (e.g. EOI) in the interrupt service routines in VNFs + - Exit to the user-level (e.g. QEMU) + +.. Figure:: kvm1.png + + +Design Considerations +--------------------- + +The latency variation and jitters can be minimized with the below +steps (with some in parallel): + + 1. Statically and exclusively assign hardware resources + (CPUs, memory, caches,) to the VNFs. + + 2. Pre-allocate huge pages (e.g. 1 GB/2MB pages) and guest-to-host mapping, + e.g. EPT (Extended Page Table) page tables, to minimize or mitigate + latency from misses in caches, + + 3. Use the host Linux configured for hard real-time and packet latency, + Check the set of virtual devices used by the VMs to optimize or + eliminate virtualization overhead if applicable + + 4. Use advanced hardware virtualization features that can reduce or + eliminate VM exits, if present, and + + 5. Inspect the code paths in KVM and associated kernel services to + eliminate code that can cause latencies (e.g. loops and spin locks). + + 6. Measure latencies intensively. We leverage the existing testing methods. + OSADL, for example, defines industry tests for timing correctness. + + +Goals and Guidelines +-------------------- + +The output of this project will provide : + + 1. A list of the performance goals, which will be obtained by the + OPNFV members (as described above) + + 2. A set of comprehensive instructions for the system configurations + (hardware features, BIOS setup, kernel parameters, VM configuration, + options to QEMU/KVM, etc.) + + 3. The above features to the upstream of Linux, the real-time patch + set, KVM, QEMU, libvirt, and + + 4. Performance and interrupt latency measurement tools + + +Test plan +--------- + +The tests that need to be conducted to make sure that all components from OPNFV +meet the requirement are mentioned below: + +**Timer test**:This test utilize the cyclictest +(https://rt.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Cyclictest) to test the guest timer +latency (the latency from the time that the guest timer should be triggered +to the time the guest timer is really triggered). + +.. Figure:: TimerTest.png + +**Device Interrupt Test**:A device on the hardware platform trigger interrupt +every one ms and the device interrupt will be delivered to the VNF. This test +cover the latency from the interrupt happened on the hardware to the time the +interrupt handled in the VNF. + +.. Figure:: DeviceInterruptTest.png + +**Packet forwarding (DPDK OVS)**:A packet is sent from TG (Traffic Generator) +to a VNF. The VNF, after processing the packet, forwards the packet to another +NIC and in the end the packet is received by the traffic generator. The test +check the latency from the packet is sent out by the TC to the time the packet +is received by the TC. + +.. Figure:: PacketforwardingDPDK_OVS.png + +**Packet Forwarding (SR-IOV)**:This test is similar to Packet Forwarding +(DPDK OVS). However, instead of using virtio NIC devices on the guest, +a PCI NIC or a PCI VF NIC is assigned to the guest for network acess. + +**Bare-metal Packet Forwarding**:This is used to compare with the above +packet forwarding scenario. + +.. Figure:: Bare-metalPacketForwarding.png + +---------- +Reference +---------- + +https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/kvm/ |