diff options
author | Bin Hu <bh526r@att.com> | 2016-07-22 15:52:43 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | Bin Hu <bh526r@att.com> | 2016-07-22 15:53:56 -0700 |
commit | e5221f56ba631f8774ac50b2cb316178b9b2cf1a (patch) | |
tree | 62eb15c0fce68d786fe93b88c742d211fbea82a5 /docs | |
parent | c519c9bdda8acee4f5cdf4ad5d12d6401e435489 (diff) |
Gap analysis of IPv6 in Mitaka and Boron
Change-Id: Ib5f439d0f74d852ab8b4b04a8fafd9b489753983
Signed-off-by: Bin Hu <bh526r@att.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'docs')
-rw-r--r-- | docs/gapanalysis/gap-analysis-odl-boron.rst | 56 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | docs/gapanalysis/gap-analysis-openstack-mitaka.rst | 118 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | docs/gapanalysis/index.rst | 6 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | docs/proofread/index.rst | 313 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | docs/userguide/featureusage.rst | 313 |
5 files changed, 489 insertions, 317 deletions
diff --git a/docs/gapanalysis/gap-analysis-odl-boron.rst b/docs/gapanalysis/gap-analysis-odl-boron.rst new file mode 100644 index 0000000..efe5d13 --- /dev/null +++ b/docs/gapanalysis/gap-analysis-odl-boron.rst @@ -0,0 +1,56 @@ +.. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. +.. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 +.. (c) Bin Hu (AT&T) and Sridhar Gaddam (RedHat) + +========================================== +IPv6 Gap Analysis with Open Daylight Boron +========================================== + +This section provides users with IPv6 gap analysis regarding feature requirement with +Open Daylight Boron Official Release. The following table lists the use cases / feature +requirements of VIM-agnostic IPv6 functionality, including infrastructure layer and VNF +(VM) layer, and its gap analysis with Open Daylight Boron Official Release. + +.. table:: + :class: longtable + + +-------------------------------------------------------------+----------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+ + |Use Case / Requirement |Supported in ODL Boron|Notes | + +=============================================================+======================+==========================================================================+ + |REST API support for IPv6 subnet creation in ODL |Yes |Yes, it is possible to create IPv6 subnets in ODL using Neutron REST API. | + | | | | + | | |For a network which has both IPv4 and IPv6 subnets, ODL mechanism driver | + | | |will send the port information which includes IPv4/v6 addresses to ODL | + | | |Neutron northbound API. When port information is queried it displays IPv4 | + | | |and IPv6 addresses. However, in Boron release, ODL net-virt provider | + | | |does not support IPv6 features (i.e., the actual functionality is missing | + | | |and would be available only in the later releases of ODL). | + +-------------------------------------------------------------+----------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+ + |IPv6 Router support in ODL |**No** |ODL net-virt provider in Boron release only supports IPv4 Router. | + | | | | + |1. Communication between VMs on same compute node | |In the meantime, if IPv6 Routing is necessary, we can use ODL for L2 | + |2. Communication between VMs on different compute nodes | |connectivity and Neutron L3 agent for IPv4/v6 routing. | + | (east-west) | | | + |3. External routing (north-south) | | | + +-------------------------------------------------------------+----------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+ + |IPAM: Support for IPv6 Address assignment modes. |**No** |Although it is possible to create different types of IPv6 subnets in ODL, | + | | |ODL_L3 would have to implement the IPv6 Router that can send out Router | + |1. SLAAC | |Advertisements based on the IPv6 addressing mode. Router Advertisement | + |2. DHCPv6 Stateless | |is also necessary for VMs to configure the default route. | + |3. DHCPv6 Stateful | | | + +-------------------------------------------------------------+----------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+ + |When using ODL for L2 forwarding/tunneling, it is compatible |Yes | | + |with IPv6. | | | + +-------------------------------------------------------------+----------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+ + |Full support for IPv6 matching (i.e., IPv6, ICMPv6, TCP, UDP)|**No** |Security Groups for IPv6 is a work in progress. | + |in security groups. Ability to control and manage all IPv6 | | | + |security group capabilities via Neutron/Nova API (REST and | | | + |CLI) as well as via Horizon. | | | + +-------------------------------------------------------------+----------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+ + |Shared Networks support |Yes | | + +-------------------------------------------------------------+----------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+ + |IPv6 external L2 VLAN directly attached to a VM. |**ToDo** | | + +-------------------------------------------------------------+----------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+ + |ODL on an IPv6 only Infrastructure. |**ToDo** |Deploying OpenStack with ODL on an IPv6 only infrastructure where the API | + | | |endpoints are all IPv6 addresses. | + +-------------------------------------------------------------+----------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+ diff --git a/docs/gapanalysis/gap-analysis-openstack-mitaka.rst b/docs/gapanalysis/gap-analysis-openstack-mitaka.rst new file mode 100644 index 0000000..680c882 --- /dev/null +++ b/docs/gapanalysis/gap-analysis-openstack-mitaka.rst @@ -0,0 +1,118 @@ +.. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. +.. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 +.. (c) Bin Hu (AT&T) and Sridhar Gaddam (RedHat) + +======================================= +IPv6 Gap Analysis with OpenStack Mitaka +======================================= + +This section provides users with IPv6 gap analysis regarding feature requirement with +OpenStack Neutron in Mitaka Official Release. The following table lists the use cases / feature +requirements of VIM-agnostic IPv6 functionality, including infrastructure layer and VNF +(VM) layer, and its gap analysis with OpenStack Neutron in Mitaka Official Release. + +.. table:: + :class: longtable + + +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ + |Use Case / Requirement |Supported in Mitaka|Notes | + +===========================================================+===================+====================================================================+ + |All topologies work in a multi-tenant environment |Yes |The IPv6 design is following the Neutron tenant networks model; | + | | |dnsmasq is being used inside DHCP network namespaces, while radvd | + | | |is being used inside Neutron routers namespaces to provide full | + | | |isolation between tenants. Tenant isolation can be based on VLANs, | + | | |GRE, or VXLAN encapsulation. In case of overlays, the transport | + | | |network (and VTEPs) must be IPv4 based as of today. | + +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ + |IPv6 VM to VM only |Yes |It is possible to assign IPv6-only addresses to VMs. Both switching | + | | |(within VMs on the same tenant network) as well as east/west routing| + | | |(between different networks of the same tenant) are supported. | + +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ + |IPv6 external L2 VLAN directly attached to a VM |Yes |IPv6 provider network model; RA messages from upstream (external) | + | | |router are forwarded into the VMs | + +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ + |IPv6 subnet routed via L3 agent to an external IPv6 network| |Configuration is enhanced since Kilo to allow easier setup of the | + | |1. Yes |upstream gateway, without the user being forced to create an IPv6 | + |1. Both VLAN and overlay (e.g. GRE, VXLAN) subnet attached | |subnet for the external network. | + | to VMs; | | | + |2. Must be able to support multiple L3 agents for a given |2. Yes | | + | external network to support scaling (neutron scheduler | | | + | to assign vRouters to the L3 agents) | | | + +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ + |Ability for a NIC to support both IPv4 and IPv6 (dual | |Dual-stack is supported in Neutron with the addition of | + |stack) address. | |``Multiple IPv6 Prefixes`` Blueprint | + | | | | + |1. VM with a single interface associated with a network, |1. Yes | | + | which is then associated with two subnets. | | | + |2. VM with two different interfaces associated with two |2. Yes | | + | different networks and two different subnets. | | | + +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ + |Support IPv6 Address assignment modes. |1. Yes | | + | | | | + |1. SLAAC |2. Yes | | + |2. DHCPv6 Stateless | | | + |3. DHCPv6 Stateful |3. Yes | | + +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ + |Ability to create a port on an IPv6 DHCPv6 Stateful subnet |Yes | | + |and assign a specific IPv6 address to the port and have it | | | + |taken out of the DHCP address pool. | | | + +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ + |Ability to create a port with fixed_ip for a |**No** |The following patch disables this operation: | + |SLAAC/DHCPv6-Stateless Subnet. | |https://review.openstack.org/#/c/129144/ | + +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ + |Support for private IPv6 to external IPv6 floating IP; |**Rejected** |Blueprint proposed in upstream and got rejected. General expectation| + |Ability to specify floating IPs via Neutron API (REST and | |is to avoid NAT with IPv6 by assigning GUA to tenant VMs. See | + |CLI) as well as via Horizon, including combination of | |https://review.openstack.org/#/c/139731/ for discussion. | + |IPv6/IPv4 and IPv4/IPv6 floating IPs if implemented. | | | + +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ + |Provide IPv6/IPv4 feature parity in support for |**To-Do** |The L3 configuration should be transparent for the SR-IOV | + |pass-through capabilities (e.g., SR-IOV). | |implementation. SR-IOV networking support introduced in Juno based | + | | |on the ``sriovnicswitch`` ML2 driver is expected to work with IPv4 | + | | |and IPv6 enabled VMs. We need to verify if it works or not. | + +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ + |Additional IPv6 extensions, for example: IPSEC, IPv6 |**No** |It does not appear to be considered yet (lack of clear requirements)| + |Anycast, Multicast | | | + +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ + |VM access to the meta-data server to obtain user data, SSH |**No** |This is currently not supported. Config-drive or dual-stack IPv4 / | + |keys, etc. using cloud-init with IPv6 only interfaces. | |IPv6 can be used as a workaround (so that the IPv4 network is used | + | | |to obtain connectivity with the metadata service) | + +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ + |Full support for IPv6 matching (i.e., IPv6, ICMPv6, TCP, |Yes | | + |UDP) in security groups. Ability to control and manage all | | | + |IPv6 security group capabilities via Neutron/Nova API (REST| | | + |and CLI) as well as via Horizon. | | | + +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ + |During network/subnet/router create, there should be an |Yes |Two new Subnet attributes were introduced to control IPv6 address | + |option to allow user to specify the type of address | |assignment options: | + |management they would like. This includes all options | | | + |including those low priority if implemented (e.g., toggle | |* ``ipv6-ra-mode``: to determine who sends Router Advertisements; | + |on/off router and address prefix advertisements); It must | | | + |be supported via Neutron API (REST and CLI) as well as via | |* ``ipv6-address-mode``: to determine how VM obtains IPv6 address, | + |Horizon | | default gateway, and/or optional information. | + +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ + |Security groups anti-spoofing: Prevent VM from using a |Yes | | + |source IPv6/MAC address which is not assigned to the VM | | | + +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ + |Protect tenant and provider network from rogue RAs |Yes |When using a tenant network, Neutron is going to automatically | + | | |handle the filter rules to allow connectivity of RAs to the VMs only| + | | |from the Neutron router port; with provider networks, users are | + | | |required to specify the LLA of the upstream router during the subnet| + | | |creation, or otherwise manually edit the security-groups rules to | + | | |allow incoming traffic from this specific address. | + +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ + |Support the ability to assign multiple IPv6 addresses to |Yes | | + |an interface; both for Neutron router interfaces and VM | | | + |interfaces. | | | + +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ + |Ability for a VM to support a mix of multiple IPv4 and IPv6|Yes | | + |networks, including multiples of the same type. | | | + +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ + |Support for IPv6 Prefix Delegation. |Yes |Partial support in Mitaka | + +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ + |Distributed Virtual Routing (DVR) support for IPv6 |**No** |Blueprint proposed upstream, pending discussion. | + +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ + |IPv6 First-Hop Security, IPv6 ND spoofing |Yes | | + +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ + |IPv6 support in Neutron Layer3 High Availability |Yes | | + |(keepalived+VRRP). | | | + +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ diff --git a/docs/gapanalysis/index.rst b/docs/gapanalysis/index.rst index a1e1bbf..f212e83 100644 --- a/docs/gapanalysis/index.rst +++ b/docs/gapanalysis/index.rst @@ -13,12 +13,12 @@ IPv6 Gap Analysis :Abstract: This document provides the users with top-down gap analysis regarding IPv6 feature requirements with -OpenStack Liberty Official Release and Open Daylight Beryllium Official Release. +OpenStack Mitaka Official Release and Open Daylight Boron Official Release. .. toctree:: :numbered: :maxdepth: 4 - gap-analysis-openstack-liberty.rst - gap-analysis-odl-beryllium.rst + gap-analysis-openstack-mitaka.rst + gap-analysis-odl-boron.rst diff --git a/docs/proofread/index.rst b/docs/proofread/index.rst index ce1d29d..bc3e10f 100644 --- a/docs/proofread/index.rst +++ b/docs/proofread/index.rst @@ -2,181 +2,180 @@ .. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 .. (c) Bin Hu (AT&T) and Sridhar Gaddam (RedHat) -========================================= -Using IPv6 Feature of Brahmaputra Release -========================================= +====================================== +Using IPv6 Feature of Colorado Release +====================================== This section provides the users with gap analysis regarding IPv6 feature requirements with -OpenStack Liberty Official Release and Open Daylight Beryllium Official Release. The gap analysis +OpenStack Mitaka Official Release and Open Daylight Boron Official Release. The gap analysis serves as feature specific user guides and references when as a user you may leverage the IPv6 feature in the platform and need to perform some IPv6 related operations. -**************************************** -IPv6 Gap Analysis with OpenStack Liberty -**************************************** +*************************************** +IPv6 Gap Analysis with OpenStack Mitaka +*************************************** This section provides users with IPv6 gap analysis regarding feature requirement with -OpenStack Neutron in Liberty Official Release. The following table lists the use cases / feature +OpenStack Neutron in Mitaka Official Release. The following table lists the use cases / feature requirements of VIM-agnostic IPv6 functionality, including infrastructure layer and VNF -(VM) layer, and its gap analysis with OpenStack Neutron in Liberty Official Release. +(VM) layer, and its gap analysis with OpenStack Neutron in Mitaka Official Release. .. table:: :class: longtable - +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ - |Use Case / Requirement |Supported in Liberty |Notes | - +===========================================================+=========================+====================================================================+ - |All topologies work in a multi-tenant environment |Yes |The IPv6 design is following the Neutron tenant networks model; | - | | |dnsmasq is being used inside DHCP network namespaces, while radvd | - | | |is being used inside Neutron routers namespaces to provide full | - | | |isolation between tenants. Tenant isolation can be based on VLANs, | - | | |GRE, or VXLAN encapsulation. In case of overlays, the transport | - | | |network (and VTEPs) must be IPv4 based as of today. | - +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ - |IPv6 VM to VM only |Yes |It is possible to assign IPv6-only addresses to VMs. Both switching | - | | |(within VMs on the same tenant network) as well as east/west routing| - | | |(between different networks of the same tenant) are supported. | - +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ - |IPv6 external L2 VLAN directly attached to a VM |Yes |IPv6 provider network model; RA messages from upstream (external) | - | | |router are forwarded into the VMs | - +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ - |IPv6 subnet routed via L3 agent to an external IPv6 network| |Configuration is enhanced since Kilo to allow easier setup of the | - | |1. Yes |upstream gateway, without the user being forced to create an IPv6 | - |1. Both VLAN and overlay (e.g. GRE, VXLAN) subnet attached | |subnet for the external network. | - | to VMs; | | | - |2. Must be able to support multiple L3 agents for a given |2. Yes | | - | external network to support scaling (neutron scheduler | | | - | to assign vRouters to the L3 agents) | | | - +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ - |Ability for a NIC to support both IPv4 and IPv6 (dual | |Dual-stack is supported in Neutron with the addition of | - |stack) address. | |``Multiple IPv6 Prefixes`` Blueprint | - | | | | - |1. VM with a single interface associated with a network, |1. Yes | | - | which is then associated with two subnets. | | | - |2. VM with two different interfaces associated with two |2. Yes | | - | different networks and two different subnets. | | | - +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ - |Support IPv6 Address assignment modes. |1. Yes | | - | | | | - |1. SLAAC |2. Yes | | - |2. DHCPv6 Stateless | | | - |3. DHCPv6 Stateful |3. Yes | | - +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ - |Ability to create a port on an IPv6 DHCPv6 Stateful subnet |Yes | | - |and assign a specific IPv6 address to the port and have it | | | - |taken out of the DHCP address pool. | | | - +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ - |Ability to create a port with fixed_ip for a |**No** |The following patch disables this operation: | - |SLAAC/DHCPv6-Stateless Subnet. | |https://review.openstack.org/#/c/129144/ | - +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ - |Support for private IPv6 to external IPv6 floating IP; |**Rejected** |Blueprint proposed in upstream and got rejected. General expectation| - |Ability to specify floating IPs via Neutron API (REST and | |is to avoid NAT with IPv6 by assigning GUA to tenant VMs. See | - |CLI) as well as via Horizon, including combination of | |https://review.openstack.org/#/c/139731/ for discussion. | - |IPv6/IPv4 and IPv4/IPv6 floating IPs if implemented. | | | - +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ - |Provide IPv6/IPv4 feature parity in support for |**To-Do** |The L3 configuration should be transparent for the SR-IOV | - |pass-through capabilities (e.g., SR-IOV). | |implementation. SR-IOV networking support introduced in Juno based | - | | |on the ``sriovnicswitch`` ML2 driver is expected to work with IPv4 | - | | |and IPv6 enabled VMs. We need to verify if it works or not. | - +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ - |Additional IPv6 extensions, for example: IPSEC, IPv6 |**No** |It does not appear to be considered yet (lack of clear requirements)| - |Anycast, Multicast | | | - +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ - |VM access to the meta-data server to obtain user data, SSH |**No** |This is currently not supported. Config-drive or dual-stack IPv4 / | - |keys, etc. using cloud-init with IPv6 only interfaces. | |IPv6 can be used as a workaround (so that the IPv4 network is used | - | | |to obtain connectivity with the metadata service) | - +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ - |Full support for IPv6 matching (i.e., IPv6, ICMPv6, TCP, |Yes | | - |UDP) in security groups. Ability to control and manage all | | | - |IPv6 security group capabilities via Neutron/Nova API (REST| | | - |and CLI) as well as via Horizon. | | | - +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ - |During network/subnet/router create, there should be an |Yes |Two new Subnet attributes were introduced to control IPv6 address | - |option to allow user to specify the type of address | |assignment options: | - |management they would like. This includes all options | | | - |including those low priority if implemented (e.g., toggle | |* ``ipv6-ra-mode``: to determine who sends Router Advertisements; | - |on/off router and address prefix advertisements); It must | | | - |be supported via Neutron API (REST and CLI) as well as via | |* ``ipv6-address-mode``: to determine how VM obtains IPv6 address, | - |Horizon | | default gateway, and/or optional information. | - +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ - |Security groups anti-spoofing: Prevent VM from using a |Yes | | - |source IPv6/MAC address which is not assigned to the VM | | | - +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ - |Protect tenant and provider network from rogue RAs |Yes |When using a tenant network, Neutron is going to automatically | - | | |handle the filter rules to allow connectivity of RAs to the VMs only| - | | |from the Neutron router port; with provider networks, users are | - | | |required to specify the LLA of the upstream router during the subnet| - | | |creation, or otherwise manually edit the security-groups rules to | - | | |allow incoming traffic from this specific address. | - +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ - |Support the ability to assign multiple IPv6 addresses to |Yes | | - |an interface; both for Neutron router interfaces and VM | | | - |interfaces. | | | - +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ - |Ability for a VM to support a mix of multiple IPv4 and IPv6|Yes | | - |networks, including multiples of the same type. | | | - +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ - |Support for IPv6 Prefix Delegation. |Yes |Partial support in Liberty | - +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ - |Distributed Virtual Routing (DVR) support for IPv6 |**No** |Blueprint proposed upstream, pending discussion. | - +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ - |IPv6 First-Hop Security, IPv6 ND spoofing |Yes | | - +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ - |IPv6 support in Neutron Layer3 High Availability |Yes | | - |(keepalived+VRRP). | | | - +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ + +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ + |Use Case / Requirement |Supported in Mitaka|Notes | + +===========================================================+===================+====================================================================+ + |All topologies work in a multi-tenant environment |Yes |The IPv6 design is following the Neutron tenant networks model; | + | | |dnsmasq is being used inside DHCP network namespaces, while radvd | + | | |is being used inside Neutron routers namespaces to provide full | + | | |isolation between tenants. Tenant isolation can be based on VLANs, | + | | |GRE, or VXLAN encapsulation. In case of overlays, the transport | + | | |network (and VTEPs) must be IPv4 based as of today. | + +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ + |IPv6 VM to VM only |Yes |It is possible to assign IPv6-only addresses to VMs. Both switching | + | | |(within VMs on the same tenant network) as well as east/west routing| + | | |(between different networks of the same tenant) are supported. | + +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ + |IPv6 external L2 VLAN directly attached to a VM |Yes |IPv6 provider network model; RA messages from upstream (external) | + | | |router are forwarded into the VMs | + +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ + |IPv6 subnet routed via L3 agent to an external IPv6 network| |Configuration is enhanced since Kilo to allow easier setup of the | + | |1. Yes |upstream gateway, without the user being forced to create an IPv6 | + |1. Both VLAN and overlay (e.g. GRE, VXLAN) subnet attached | |subnet for the external network. | + | to VMs; | | | + |2. Must be able to support multiple L3 agents for a given |2. Yes | | + | external network to support scaling (neutron scheduler | | | + | to assign vRouters to the L3 agents) | | | + +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ + |Ability for a NIC to support both IPv4 and IPv6 (dual | |Dual-stack is supported in Neutron with the addition of | + |stack) address. | |``Multiple IPv6 Prefixes`` Blueprint | + | | | | + |1. VM with a single interface associated with a network, |1. Yes | | + | which is then associated with two subnets. | | | + |2. VM with two different interfaces associated with two |2. Yes | | + | different networks and two different subnets. | | | + +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ + |Support IPv6 Address assignment modes. |1. Yes | | + | | | | + |1. SLAAC |2. Yes | | + |2. DHCPv6 Stateless | | | + |3. DHCPv6 Stateful |3. Yes | | + +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ + |Ability to create a port on an IPv6 DHCPv6 Stateful subnet |Yes | | + |and assign a specific IPv6 address to the port and have it | | | + |taken out of the DHCP address pool. | | | + +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ + |Ability to create a port with fixed_ip for a |**No** |The following patch disables this operation: | + |SLAAC/DHCPv6-Stateless Subnet. | |https://review.openstack.org/#/c/129144/ | + +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ + |Support for private IPv6 to external IPv6 floating IP; |**Rejected** |Blueprint proposed in upstream and got rejected. General expectation| + |Ability to specify floating IPs via Neutron API (REST and | |is to avoid NAT with IPv6 by assigning GUA to tenant VMs. See | + |CLI) as well as via Horizon, including combination of | |https://review.openstack.org/#/c/139731/ for discussion. | + |IPv6/IPv4 and IPv4/IPv6 floating IPs if implemented. | | | + +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ + |Provide IPv6/IPv4 feature parity in support for |**To-Do** |The L3 configuration should be transparent for the SR-IOV | + |pass-through capabilities (e.g., SR-IOV). | |implementation. SR-IOV networking support introduced in Juno based | + | | |on the ``sriovnicswitch`` ML2 driver is expected to work with IPv4 | + | | |and IPv6 enabled VMs. We need to verify if it works or not. | + +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ + |Additional IPv6 extensions, for example: IPSEC, IPv6 |**No** |It does not appear to be considered yet (lack of clear requirements)| + |Anycast, Multicast | | | + +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ + |VM access to the meta-data server to obtain user data, SSH |**No** |This is currently not supported. Config-drive or dual-stack IPv4 / | + |keys, etc. using cloud-init with IPv6 only interfaces. | |IPv6 can be used as a workaround (so that the IPv4 network is used | + | | |to obtain connectivity with the metadata service) | + +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ + |Full support for IPv6 matching (i.e., IPv6, ICMPv6, TCP, |Yes | | + |UDP) in security groups. Ability to control and manage all | | | + |IPv6 security group capabilities via Neutron/Nova API (REST| | | + |and CLI) as well as via Horizon. | | | + +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ + |During network/subnet/router create, there should be an |Yes |Two new Subnet attributes were introduced to control IPv6 address | + |option to allow user to specify the type of address | |assignment options: | + |management they would like. This includes all options | | | + |including those low priority if implemented (e.g., toggle | |* ``ipv6-ra-mode``: to determine who sends Router Advertisements; | + |on/off router and address prefix advertisements); It must | | | + |be supported via Neutron API (REST and CLI) as well as via | |* ``ipv6-address-mode``: to determine how VM obtains IPv6 address, | + |Horizon | | default gateway, and/or optional information. | + +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ + |Security groups anti-spoofing: Prevent VM from using a |Yes | | + |source IPv6/MAC address which is not assigned to the VM | | | + +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ + |Protect tenant and provider network from rogue RAs |Yes |When using a tenant network, Neutron is going to automatically | + | | |handle the filter rules to allow connectivity of RAs to the VMs only| + | | |from the Neutron router port; with provider networks, users are | + | | |required to specify the LLA of the upstream router during the subnet| + | | |creation, or otherwise manually edit the security-groups rules to | + | | |allow incoming traffic from this specific address. | + +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ + |Support the ability to assign multiple IPv6 addresses to |Yes | | + |an interface; both for Neutron router interfaces and VM | | | + |interfaces. | | | + +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ + |Ability for a VM to support a mix of multiple IPv4 and IPv6|Yes | | + |networks, including multiples of the same type. | | | + +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ + |Support for IPv6 Prefix Delegation. |Yes |Partial support in Mitaka | + +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ + |Distributed Virtual Routing (DVR) support for IPv6 |**No** |Blueprint proposed upstream, pending discussion. | + +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ + |IPv6 First-Hop Security, IPv6 ND spoofing |Yes | | + +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ + |IPv6 support in Neutron Layer3 High Availability |Yes | | + |(keepalived+VRRP). | | | + +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ -********************************************** -IPv6 Gap Analysis with Open Daylight Beryllium -********************************************** +****************************************** +IPv6 Gap Analysis with Open Daylight Boron +****************************************** This section provides users with IPv6 gap analysis regarding feature requirement with -Open Daylight Beryllium Official Release. The following table lists the use cases / feature +Open Daylight Boron Official Release. The following table lists the use cases / feature requirements of VIM-agnostic IPv6 functionality, including infrastructure layer and VNF -(VM) layer, and its gap analysis with Open Daylight Beryllium Official Release. +(VM) layer, and its gap analysis with Open Daylight Boron Official Release. .. table:: :class: longtable - +-------------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+ - |Use Case / Requirement |Supported in ODL Beryllium|Notes | - +=============================================================+==========================+==========================================================================+ - |REST API support for IPv6 subnet creation in ODL |Yes |Yes, it is possible to create IPv6 subnets in ODL using Neutron REST API. | - | | | | - | | |For a network which has both IPv4 and IPv6 subnets, ODL mechanism driver | - | | |will send the port information which includes IPv4/v6 addresses to ODL | - | | |Neutron northbound API. When port information is queried it displays IPv4 | - | | |and IPv6 addresses. However, in Beryllium release, ODL net-virt provider | - | | |does not support IPv6 features (i.e., the actual functionality is missing | - | | |and would be available only in the later releases of ODL). | - +-------------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+ - |IPv6 Router support in ODL |**No** |ODL net-virt provider in Beryllium release only supports IPv4 Router. | - | | | | - |1. Communication between VMs on same compute node | |In the meantime, if IPv6 Routing is necessary, we can use ODL for L2 | - |2. Communication between VMs on different compute nodes | |connectivity and Neutron L3 agent for IPv4/v6 routing. | - | (east-west) | | | - |3. External routing (north-south) | | | - +-------------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+ - |IPAM: Support for IPv6 Address assignment modes. |**No** |Although it is possible to create different types of IPv6 subnets in ODL, | - | | |ODL_L3 would have to implement the IPv6 Router that can send out Router | - |1. SLAAC | |Advertisements based on the IPv6 addressing mode. Router Advertisement | - |2. DHCPv6 Stateless | |is also necessary for VMs to configure the default route. | - |3. DHCPv6 Stateful | | | - +-------------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+ - |When using ODL for L2 forwarding/tunneling, it is compatible |Yes | | - |with IPv6. | | | - +-------------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+ - |Full support for IPv6 matching (i.e., IPv6, ICMPv6, TCP, UDP)|**No** |Security Groups for IPv6 is a work in progress. | - |in security groups. Ability to control and manage all IPv6 | | | - |security group capabilities via Neutron/Nova API (REST and | | | - |CLI) as well as via Horizon. | | | - +-------------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+ - |Shared Networks support |**No** |ODL currently assumes a single tenant to network mapping and does not | - | | |support shared networks among tenants. | - +-------------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+ - |IPv6 external L2 VLAN directly attached to a VM. |**ToDo** | | - +-------------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+ - |ODL on an IPv6 only Infrastructure. |**ToDo** |Deploying OpenStack with ODL on an IPv6 only infrastructure where the API | - | | |endpoints are all IPv6 addresses. | - +-------------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+ + +-------------------------------------------------------------+----------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+ + |Use Case / Requirement |Supported in ODL Boron|Notes | + +=============================================================+======================+==========================================================================+ + |REST API support for IPv6 subnet creation in ODL |Yes |Yes, it is possible to create IPv6 subnets in ODL using Neutron REST API. | + | | | | + | | |For a network which has both IPv4 and IPv6 subnets, ODL mechanism driver | + | | |will send the port information which includes IPv4/v6 addresses to ODL | + | | |Neutron northbound API. When port information is queried it displays IPv4 | + | | |and IPv6 addresses. However, in Boron release, ODL net-virt provider | + | | |does not support IPv6 features (i.e., the actual functionality is missing | + | | |and would be available only in the later releases of ODL). | + +-------------------------------------------------------------+----------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+ + |IPv6 Router support in ODL |**No** |ODL net-virt provider in Boron release only supports IPv4 Router. | + | | | | + |1. Communication between VMs on same compute node | |In the meantime, if IPv6 Routing is necessary, we can use ODL for L2 | + |2. Communication between VMs on different compute nodes | |connectivity and Neutron L3 agent for IPv4/v6 routing. | + | (east-west) | | | + |3. External routing (north-south) | | | + +-------------------------------------------------------------+----------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+ + |IPAM: Support for IPv6 Address assignment modes. |**No** |Although it is possible to create different types of IPv6 subnets in ODL, | + | | |ODL_L3 would have to implement the IPv6 Router that can send out Router | + |1. SLAAC | |Advertisements based on the IPv6 addressing mode. Router Advertisement | + |2. DHCPv6 Stateless | |is also necessary for VMs to configure the default route. | + |3. DHCPv6 Stateful | | | + +-------------------------------------------------------------+----------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+ + |When using ODL for L2 forwarding/tunneling, it is compatible |Yes | | + |with IPv6. | | | + +-------------------------------------------------------------+----------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+ + |Full support for IPv6 matching (i.e., IPv6, ICMPv6, TCP, UDP)|**No** |Security Groups for IPv6 is a work in progress. | + |in security groups. Ability to control and manage all IPv6 | | | + |security group capabilities via Neutron/Nova API (REST and | | | + |CLI) as well as via Horizon. | | | + +-------------------------------------------------------------+----------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+ + |Shared Networks support |Yes | | + +-------------------------------------------------------------+----------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+ + |IPv6 external L2 VLAN directly attached to a VM. |**ToDo** | | + +-------------------------------------------------------------+----------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+ + |ODL on an IPv6 only Infrastructure. |**ToDo** |Deploying OpenStack with ODL on an IPv6 only infrastructure where the API | + | | |endpoints are all IPv6 addresses. | + +-------------------------------------------------------------+----------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+ diff --git a/docs/userguide/featureusage.rst b/docs/userguide/featureusage.rst index ce1d29d..bc3e10f 100644 --- a/docs/userguide/featureusage.rst +++ b/docs/userguide/featureusage.rst @@ -2,181 +2,180 @@ .. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 .. (c) Bin Hu (AT&T) and Sridhar Gaddam (RedHat) -========================================= -Using IPv6 Feature of Brahmaputra Release -========================================= +====================================== +Using IPv6 Feature of Colorado Release +====================================== This section provides the users with gap analysis regarding IPv6 feature requirements with -OpenStack Liberty Official Release and Open Daylight Beryllium Official Release. The gap analysis +OpenStack Mitaka Official Release and Open Daylight Boron Official Release. The gap analysis serves as feature specific user guides and references when as a user you may leverage the IPv6 feature in the platform and need to perform some IPv6 related operations. -**************************************** -IPv6 Gap Analysis with OpenStack Liberty -**************************************** +*************************************** +IPv6 Gap Analysis with OpenStack Mitaka +*************************************** This section provides users with IPv6 gap analysis regarding feature requirement with -OpenStack Neutron in Liberty Official Release. The following table lists the use cases / feature +OpenStack Neutron in Mitaka Official Release. The following table lists the use cases / feature requirements of VIM-agnostic IPv6 functionality, including infrastructure layer and VNF -(VM) layer, and its gap analysis with OpenStack Neutron in Liberty Official Release. +(VM) layer, and its gap analysis with OpenStack Neutron in Mitaka Official Release. .. table:: :class: longtable - +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ - |Use Case / Requirement |Supported in Liberty |Notes | - +===========================================================+=========================+====================================================================+ - |All topologies work in a multi-tenant environment |Yes |The IPv6 design is following the Neutron tenant networks model; | - | | |dnsmasq is being used inside DHCP network namespaces, while radvd | - | | |is being used inside Neutron routers namespaces to provide full | - | | |isolation between tenants. Tenant isolation can be based on VLANs, | - | | |GRE, or VXLAN encapsulation. In case of overlays, the transport | - | | |network (and VTEPs) must be IPv4 based as of today. | - +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ - |IPv6 VM to VM only |Yes |It is possible to assign IPv6-only addresses to VMs. Both switching | - | | |(within VMs on the same tenant network) as well as east/west routing| - | | |(between different networks of the same tenant) are supported. | - +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ - |IPv6 external L2 VLAN directly attached to a VM |Yes |IPv6 provider network model; RA messages from upstream (external) | - | | |router are forwarded into the VMs | - +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ - |IPv6 subnet routed via L3 agent to an external IPv6 network| |Configuration is enhanced since Kilo to allow easier setup of the | - | |1. Yes |upstream gateway, without the user being forced to create an IPv6 | - |1. Both VLAN and overlay (e.g. GRE, VXLAN) subnet attached | |subnet for the external network. | - | to VMs; | | | - |2. Must be able to support multiple L3 agents for a given |2. Yes | | - | external network to support scaling (neutron scheduler | | | - | to assign vRouters to the L3 agents) | | | - +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ - |Ability for a NIC to support both IPv4 and IPv6 (dual | |Dual-stack is supported in Neutron with the addition of | - |stack) address. | |``Multiple IPv6 Prefixes`` Blueprint | - | | | | - |1. VM with a single interface associated with a network, |1. Yes | | - | which is then associated with two subnets. | | | - |2. VM with two different interfaces associated with two |2. Yes | | - | different networks and two different subnets. | | | - +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ - |Support IPv6 Address assignment modes. |1. Yes | | - | | | | - |1. SLAAC |2. Yes | | - |2. DHCPv6 Stateless | | | - |3. DHCPv6 Stateful |3. Yes | | - +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ - |Ability to create a port on an IPv6 DHCPv6 Stateful subnet |Yes | | - |and assign a specific IPv6 address to the port and have it | | | - |taken out of the DHCP address pool. | | | - +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ - |Ability to create a port with fixed_ip for a |**No** |The following patch disables this operation: | - |SLAAC/DHCPv6-Stateless Subnet. | |https://review.openstack.org/#/c/129144/ | - +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ - |Support for private IPv6 to external IPv6 floating IP; |**Rejected** |Blueprint proposed in upstream and got rejected. General expectation| - |Ability to specify floating IPs via Neutron API (REST and | |is to avoid NAT with IPv6 by assigning GUA to tenant VMs. See | - |CLI) as well as via Horizon, including combination of | |https://review.openstack.org/#/c/139731/ for discussion. | - |IPv6/IPv4 and IPv4/IPv6 floating IPs if implemented. | | | - +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ - |Provide IPv6/IPv4 feature parity in support for |**To-Do** |The L3 configuration should be transparent for the SR-IOV | - |pass-through capabilities (e.g., SR-IOV). | |implementation. SR-IOV networking support introduced in Juno based | - | | |on the ``sriovnicswitch`` ML2 driver is expected to work with IPv4 | - | | |and IPv6 enabled VMs. We need to verify if it works or not. | - +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ - |Additional IPv6 extensions, for example: IPSEC, IPv6 |**No** |It does not appear to be considered yet (lack of clear requirements)| - |Anycast, Multicast | | | - +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ - |VM access to the meta-data server to obtain user data, SSH |**No** |This is currently not supported. Config-drive or dual-stack IPv4 / | - |keys, etc. using cloud-init with IPv6 only interfaces. | |IPv6 can be used as a workaround (so that the IPv4 network is used | - | | |to obtain connectivity with the metadata service) | - +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ - |Full support for IPv6 matching (i.e., IPv6, ICMPv6, TCP, |Yes | | - |UDP) in security groups. Ability to control and manage all | | | - |IPv6 security group capabilities via Neutron/Nova API (REST| | | - |and CLI) as well as via Horizon. | | | - +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ - |During network/subnet/router create, there should be an |Yes |Two new Subnet attributes were introduced to control IPv6 address | - |option to allow user to specify the type of address | |assignment options: | - |management they would like. This includes all options | | | - |including those low priority if implemented (e.g., toggle | |* ``ipv6-ra-mode``: to determine who sends Router Advertisements; | - |on/off router and address prefix advertisements); It must | | | - |be supported via Neutron API (REST and CLI) as well as via | |* ``ipv6-address-mode``: to determine how VM obtains IPv6 address, | - |Horizon | | default gateway, and/or optional information. | - +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ - |Security groups anti-spoofing: Prevent VM from using a |Yes | | - |source IPv6/MAC address which is not assigned to the VM | | | - +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ - |Protect tenant and provider network from rogue RAs |Yes |When using a tenant network, Neutron is going to automatically | - | | |handle the filter rules to allow connectivity of RAs to the VMs only| - | | |from the Neutron router port; with provider networks, users are | - | | |required to specify the LLA of the upstream router during the subnet| - | | |creation, or otherwise manually edit the security-groups rules to | - | | |allow incoming traffic from this specific address. | - +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ - |Support the ability to assign multiple IPv6 addresses to |Yes | | - |an interface; both for Neutron router interfaces and VM | | | - |interfaces. | | | - +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ - |Ability for a VM to support a mix of multiple IPv4 and IPv6|Yes | | - |networks, including multiples of the same type. | | | - +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ - |Support for IPv6 Prefix Delegation. |Yes |Partial support in Liberty | - +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ - |Distributed Virtual Routing (DVR) support for IPv6 |**No** |Blueprint proposed upstream, pending discussion. | - +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ - |IPv6 First-Hop Security, IPv6 ND spoofing |Yes | | - +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ - |IPv6 support in Neutron Layer3 High Availability |Yes | | - |(keepalived+VRRP). | | | - +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ + +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ + |Use Case / Requirement |Supported in Mitaka|Notes | + +===========================================================+===================+====================================================================+ + |All topologies work in a multi-tenant environment |Yes |The IPv6 design is following the Neutron tenant networks model; | + | | |dnsmasq is being used inside DHCP network namespaces, while radvd | + | | |is being used inside Neutron routers namespaces to provide full | + | | |isolation between tenants. Tenant isolation can be based on VLANs, | + | | |GRE, or VXLAN encapsulation. In case of overlays, the transport | + | | |network (and VTEPs) must be IPv4 based as of today. | + +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ + |IPv6 VM to VM only |Yes |It is possible to assign IPv6-only addresses to VMs. Both switching | + | | |(within VMs on the same tenant network) as well as east/west routing| + | | |(between different networks of the same tenant) are supported. | + +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ + |IPv6 external L2 VLAN directly attached to a VM |Yes |IPv6 provider network model; RA messages from upstream (external) | + | | |router are forwarded into the VMs | + +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ + |IPv6 subnet routed via L3 agent to an external IPv6 network| |Configuration is enhanced since Kilo to allow easier setup of the | + | |1. Yes |upstream gateway, without the user being forced to create an IPv6 | + |1. Both VLAN and overlay (e.g. GRE, VXLAN) subnet attached | |subnet for the external network. | + | to VMs; | | | + |2. Must be able to support multiple L3 agents for a given |2. Yes | | + | external network to support scaling (neutron scheduler | | | + | to assign vRouters to the L3 agents) | | | + +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ + |Ability for a NIC to support both IPv4 and IPv6 (dual | |Dual-stack is supported in Neutron with the addition of | + |stack) address. | |``Multiple IPv6 Prefixes`` Blueprint | + | | | | + |1. VM with a single interface associated with a network, |1. Yes | | + | which is then associated with two subnets. | | | + |2. VM with two different interfaces associated with two |2. Yes | | + | different networks and two different subnets. | | | + +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ + |Support IPv6 Address assignment modes. |1. Yes | | + | | | | + |1. SLAAC |2. Yes | | + |2. DHCPv6 Stateless | | | + |3. DHCPv6 Stateful |3. Yes | | + +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ + |Ability to create a port on an IPv6 DHCPv6 Stateful subnet |Yes | | + |and assign a specific IPv6 address to the port and have it | | | + |taken out of the DHCP address pool. | | | + +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ + |Ability to create a port with fixed_ip for a |**No** |The following patch disables this operation: | + |SLAAC/DHCPv6-Stateless Subnet. | |https://review.openstack.org/#/c/129144/ | + +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ + |Support for private IPv6 to external IPv6 floating IP; |**Rejected** |Blueprint proposed in upstream and got rejected. General expectation| + |Ability to specify floating IPs via Neutron API (REST and | |is to avoid NAT with IPv6 by assigning GUA to tenant VMs. See | + |CLI) as well as via Horizon, including combination of | |https://review.openstack.org/#/c/139731/ for discussion. | + |IPv6/IPv4 and IPv4/IPv6 floating IPs if implemented. | | | + +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ + |Provide IPv6/IPv4 feature parity in support for |**To-Do** |The L3 configuration should be transparent for the SR-IOV | + |pass-through capabilities (e.g., SR-IOV). | |implementation. SR-IOV networking support introduced in Juno based | + | | |on the ``sriovnicswitch`` ML2 driver is expected to work with IPv4 | + | | |and IPv6 enabled VMs. We need to verify if it works or not. | + +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ + |Additional IPv6 extensions, for example: IPSEC, IPv6 |**No** |It does not appear to be considered yet (lack of clear requirements)| + |Anycast, Multicast | | | + +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ + |VM access to the meta-data server to obtain user data, SSH |**No** |This is currently not supported. Config-drive or dual-stack IPv4 / | + |keys, etc. using cloud-init with IPv6 only interfaces. | |IPv6 can be used as a workaround (so that the IPv4 network is used | + | | |to obtain connectivity with the metadata service) | + +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ + |Full support for IPv6 matching (i.e., IPv6, ICMPv6, TCP, |Yes | | + |UDP) in security groups. Ability to control and manage all | | | + |IPv6 security group capabilities via Neutron/Nova API (REST| | | + |and CLI) as well as via Horizon. | | | + +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ + |During network/subnet/router create, there should be an |Yes |Two new Subnet attributes were introduced to control IPv6 address | + |option to allow user to specify the type of address | |assignment options: | + |management they would like. This includes all options | | | + |including those low priority if implemented (e.g., toggle | |* ``ipv6-ra-mode``: to determine who sends Router Advertisements; | + |on/off router and address prefix advertisements); It must | | | + |be supported via Neutron API (REST and CLI) as well as via | |* ``ipv6-address-mode``: to determine how VM obtains IPv6 address, | + |Horizon | | default gateway, and/or optional information. | + +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ + |Security groups anti-spoofing: Prevent VM from using a |Yes | | + |source IPv6/MAC address which is not assigned to the VM | | | + +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ + |Protect tenant and provider network from rogue RAs |Yes |When using a tenant network, Neutron is going to automatically | + | | |handle the filter rules to allow connectivity of RAs to the VMs only| + | | |from the Neutron router port; with provider networks, users are | + | | |required to specify the LLA of the upstream router during the subnet| + | | |creation, or otherwise manually edit the security-groups rules to | + | | |allow incoming traffic from this specific address. | + +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ + |Support the ability to assign multiple IPv6 addresses to |Yes | | + |an interface; both for Neutron router interfaces and VM | | | + |interfaces. | | | + +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ + |Ability for a VM to support a mix of multiple IPv4 and IPv6|Yes | | + |networks, including multiples of the same type. | | | + +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ + |Support for IPv6 Prefix Delegation. |Yes |Partial support in Mitaka | + +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ + |Distributed Virtual Routing (DVR) support for IPv6 |**No** |Blueprint proposed upstream, pending discussion. | + +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ + |IPv6 First-Hop Security, IPv6 ND spoofing |Yes | | + +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ + |IPv6 support in Neutron Layer3 High Availability |Yes | | + |(keepalived+VRRP). | | | + +-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ -********************************************** -IPv6 Gap Analysis with Open Daylight Beryllium -********************************************** +****************************************** +IPv6 Gap Analysis with Open Daylight Boron +****************************************** This section provides users with IPv6 gap analysis regarding feature requirement with -Open Daylight Beryllium Official Release. The following table lists the use cases / feature +Open Daylight Boron Official Release. The following table lists the use cases / feature requirements of VIM-agnostic IPv6 functionality, including infrastructure layer and VNF -(VM) layer, and its gap analysis with Open Daylight Beryllium Official Release. +(VM) layer, and its gap analysis with Open Daylight Boron Official Release. .. table:: :class: longtable - +-------------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+ - |Use Case / Requirement |Supported in ODL Beryllium|Notes | - +=============================================================+==========================+==========================================================================+ - |REST API support for IPv6 subnet creation in ODL |Yes |Yes, it is possible to create IPv6 subnets in ODL using Neutron REST API. | - | | | | - | | |For a network which has both IPv4 and IPv6 subnets, ODL mechanism driver | - | | |will send the port information which includes IPv4/v6 addresses to ODL | - | | |Neutron northbound API. When port information is queried it displays IPv4 | - | | |and IPv6 addresses. However, in Beryllium release, ODL net-virt provider | - | | |does not support IPv6 features (i.e., the actual functionality is missing | - | | |and would be available only in the later releases of ODL). | - +-------------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+ - |IPv6 Router support in ODL |**No** |ODL net-virt provider in Beryllium release only supports IPv4 Router. | - | | | | - |1. Communication between VMs on same compute node | |In the meantime, if IPv6 Routing is necessary, we can use ODL for L2 | - |2. Communication between VMs on different compute nodes | |connectivity and Neutron L3 agent for IPv4/v6 routing. | - | (east-west) | | | - |3. External routing (north-south) | | | - +-------------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+ - |IPAM: Support for IPv6 Address assignment modes. |**No** |Although it is possible to create different types of IPv6 subnets in ODL, | - | | |ODL_L3 would have to implement the IPv6 Router that can send out Router | - |1. SLAAC | |Advertisements based on the IPv6 addressing mode. Router Advertisement | - |2. DHCPv6 Stateless | |is also necessary for VMs to configure the default route. | - |3. DHCPv6 Stateful | | | - +-------------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+ - |When using ODL for L2 forwarding/tunneling, it is compatible |Yes | | - |with IPv6. | | | - +-------------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+ - |Full support for IPv6 matching (i.e., IPv6, ICMPv6, TCP, UDP)|**No** |Security Groups for IPv6 is a work in progress. | - |in security groups. Ability to control and manage all IPv6 | | | - |security group capabilities via Neutron/Nova API (REST and | | | - |CLI) as well as via Horizon. | | | - +-------------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+ - |Shared Networks support |**No** |ODL currently assumes a single tenant to network mapping and does not | - | | |support shared networks among tenants. | - +-------------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+ - |IPv6 external L2 VLAN directly attached to a VM. |**ToDo** | | - +-------------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+ - |ODL on an IPv6 only Infrastructure. |**ToDo** |Deploying OpenStack with ODL on an IPv6 only infrastructure where the API | - | | |endpoints are all IPv6 addresses. | - +-------------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+ + +-------------------------------------------------------------+----------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+ + |Use Case / Requirement |Supported in ODL Boron|Notes | + +=============================================================+======================+==========================================================================+ + |REST API support for IPv6 subnet creation in ODL |Yes |Yes, it is possible to create IPv6 subnets in ODL using Neutron REST API. | + | | | | + | | |For a network which has both IPv4 and IPv6 subnets, ODL mechanism driver | + | | |will send the port information which includes IPv4/v6 addresses to ODL | + | | |Neutron northbound API. When port information is queried it displays IPv4 | + | | |and IPv6 addresses. However, in Boron release, ODL net-virt provider | + | | |does not support IPv6 features (i.e., the actual functionality is missing | + | | |and would be available only in the later releases of ODL). | + +-------------------------------------------------------------+----------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+ + |IPv6 Router support in ODL |**No** |ODL net-virt provider in Boron release only supports IPv4 Router. | + | | | | + |1. Communication between VMs on same compute node | |In the meantime, if IPv6 Routing is necessary, we can use ODL for L2 | + |2. Communication between VMs on different compute nodes | |connectivity and Neutron L3 agent for IPv4/v6 routing. | + | (east-west) | | | + |3. External routing (north-south) | | | + +-------------------------------------------------------------+----------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+ + |IPAM: Support for IPv6 Address assignment modes. |**No** |Although it is possible to create different types of IPv6 subnets in ODL, | + | | |ODL_L3 would have to implement the IPv6 Router that can send out Router | + |1. SLAAC | |Advertisements based on the IPv6 addressing mode. Router Advertisement | + |2. DHCPv6 Stateless | |is also necessary for VMs to configure the default route. | + |3. DHCPv6 Stateful | | | + +-------------------------------------------------------------+----------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+ + |When using ODL for L2 forwarding/tunneling, it is compatible |Yes | | + |with IPv6. | | | + +-------------------------------------------------------------+----------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+ + |Full support for IPv6 matching (i.e., IPv6, ICMPv6, TCP, UDP)|**No** |Security Groups for IPv6 is a work in progress. | + |in security groups. Ability to control and manage all IPv6 | | | + |security group capabilities via Neutron/Nova API (REST and | | | + |CLI) as well as via Horizon. | | | + +-------------------------------------------------------------+----------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+ + |Shared Networks support |Yes | | + +-------------------------------------------------------------+----------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+ + |IPv6 external L2 VLAN directly attached to a VM. |**ToDo** | | + +-------------------------------------------------------------+----------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+ + |ODL on an IPv6 only Infrastructure. |**ToDo** |Deploying OpenStack with ODL on an IPv6 only infrastructure where the API | + | | |endpoints are all IPv6 addresses. | + +-------------------------------------------------------------+----------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+ |