summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/docs
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorRyota MIBU <r-mibu@cq.jp.nec.com>2016-02-04 20:22:53 +0900
committerRyota MIBU <r-mibu@cq.jp.nec.com>2016-02-04 20:22:53 +0900
commit20a7573b18e1eca2ab776e26f0a71d80dd8c00d3 (patch)
tree5a6309e3d5bfe40aedc086f830cac1c158b3a55f /docs
parentc87d0361e8a5627d997de1e7f3f6d7ef168e59ed (diff)
docs: fix PDF view
Change-Id: Id0c9005f440ba362db7ae86df6bfe9bc1c60755e Signed-off-by: Ryota MIBU <r-mibu@cq.jp.nec.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'docs')
-rw-r--r--docs/gapanalysis/gap-analysis-openstack-kilo.rst308
1 files changed, 155 insertions, 153 deletions
diff --git a/docs/gapanalysis/gap-analysis-openstack-kilo.rst b/docs/gapanalysis/gap-analysis-openstack-kilo.rst
index 355efc7..dea09ba 100644
--- a/docs/gapanalysis/gap-analysis-openstack-kilo.rst
+++ b/docs/gapanalysis/gap-analysis-openstack-kilo.rst
@@ -7,157 +7,159 @@ OpenStack Neutron in Kilo Official Release. The following table lists the use ca
requirements of VIM-agnostic IPv6 functionality, including infrastructure layer and VNF
(VM) layer, and its gap analysis with OpenStack Neutron in Kilo Official Release.
-+-------------------------------------+-------------------------+---------------------------------+
-|Use Case / Requirement |Supported in Kilo Neutron|Notes |
-+=====================================+=========================+=================================+
-|All topologies work in a multi-tenant|Yes |The IPv6 design is following the |
-|environment | |Neutron tenant networks model; |
-| | |dnsmasq is being used inside DHCP|
-| | |network namespaces, while radvd |
-| | |is being used inside Neutron |
-| | |routers namespaces to provide |
-| | |full isolation between tenants. |
-| | |Tenant isolation can be based on |
-| | |VLANs, GRE, or VXLAN |
-| | |encapsulation. In case of |
-| | |overlays, the transport network |
-| | |(and VTEPs) must be IPv4 based as|
-| | |of today. |
-+-------------------------------------+-------------------------+---------------------------------+
-|IPv6 VM to VM only |Yes |It is possible to assign IPv6- |
-| | |only addresses to VMs. Both |
-| | |switching (within VMs on the same|
-| | |tenant network) as well as east/ |
-| | |west routing (between different |
-| | |networks of the same tenant) are |
-| | |supported. |
-+-------------------------------------+-------------------------+---------------------------------+
-|IPv6 external L2 VLAN directly |Yes |IPv6 provider network model; RA |
-|attached to a VM | |messages from upstream (external)|
-| | |router are forwarded into the VMs|
-+-------------------------------------+-------------------------+---------------------------------+
-|IPv6 subnet routed via L3 agent to an| |Configuration is enhanced in Kilo|
-|external IPv6 network | |to allow easier setup of the |
-| |1. Yes |upstream gateway, without the |
-|1. Both VLAN and overlay (e.g. GRE, | |user forced to create an IPv6 |
-| VXLAN) subnet attached to VMs; | |subnet for the external network. |
-|2. Must be able to support multiple |2. Yes | |
-| L3 agents for a given external | | |
-| network to support scaling | | |
-| (neutron scheduler to assign | | |
-| vRouters to the L3 agents) | | |
-+-------------------------------------+-------------------------+---------------------------------+
-|Ability for a NIC to support both | |Dual-stack is supported in |
-|IPv4 and IPv6 (dual stack) address. | |Neutron with the addition of |
-| | |``Multiple IPv6 Prefixes`` |
-|1. VM with a single interface |1. Yes |Blueprint |
-| associated with a network, which | | |
-| is then associated with two | | |
-| subnets | | |
-|2. VM with two different interfaces |2. Yes | |
-| associated with two different | | |
-| networks and two different subnets| | |
-+-------------------------------------+-------------------------+---------------------------------+
-|Support IPv6 Address assignment modes|1. Yes | |
-| | | |
-|1. SLAAC |2. Yes | |
-|2. DHCPv6 Stateless | | |
-|3. DHCPv6 Stateful |3. Yes | |
-+-------------------------------------+-------------------------+---------------------------------+
-|Ability to create a port on an IPv6 |Yes | |
-|DHCPv6 Stateful subnet and assign a | | |
-|specific IPv6 address to the port and| | |
-|have it taken out of the DHCP address| | |
-|pool. | | |
-+-------------------------------------+-------------------------+---------------------------------+
-|Ability to create a port with |**No** |The following patch disables this|
-|fixed_ip for a SLAAC/DHCPv6-Stateless| |operation: https://review.opensta|
-|Subnet. | |ck.org/#/c/129144/ |
-+-------------------------------------+-------------------------+---------------------------------+
-|Support for private IPv6 to external |**Rejected** |Blueprint proposed in upstream |
-|IPv6 floating IP; Ability to specify | |and got rejected. General |
-|floating IPs via Neutron API (REST | |expectation is to avoid NAT with |
-|and CLI) as well as via Horizon, | |IPv6 by assigning GUA to tenant |
-|including combination of IPv6/IPv4 | |VMs. See https://review.openstack|
-|and IPv4/IPv6 floating IPs if | |.org/#/c/139731/ for discussion. |
-|implemented. | | |
-+-------------------------------------+-------------------------+---------------------------------+
-|Provide IPv6/IPv4 feature parity in |**To-Do** |The L3 configuration should be |
-|support for pass-through capabilities| |transparent for the SR-IOV |
-|(e.g., SR-IOV). | |implementation. SR-IOV networking|
-| | |support introduced in Juno based |
-| | |on the ``sriovnicswitch`` ML2 |
-| | |driver is expected to work with |
-| | |IPv4 and IPv6 enabled VMs. We |
-| | |need to verify if it works or not|
-+-------------------------------------+-------------------------+---------------------------------+
-|Additional IPv6 extensions, for |**No** |It does not appear to be |
-|example: IPSEC, IPv6 Anycast, | |considered yet (lack of clear |
-|Multicast | |requirements) |
-+-------------------------------------+-------------------------+---------------------------------+
-|VM access to the meta-data server to |**No** |This is currently not supported. |
-|obtain user data, SSH keys, etc. | |Config-drive or dual-stack IPv4/ |
-|using cloud-init with IPv6 only | |IPv6 can be used as a workaround |
-|interfaces. | |(so that the IPv4 network is used|
-| | |to obtain connectivity with the |
-| | |metadata service) |
-+-------------------------------------+-------------------------+---------------------------------+
-|Full support for IPv6 matching (i.e.,|Yes | |
-|IPv6, ICMPv6, TCP, UDP) in security | | |
-|groups. Ability to control and manage| | |
-|all IPv6 security group capabilities | | |
-|via Neutron/Nova API (REST and CLI) | | |
-|as well as via Horizon. | | |
-+-------------------------------------+-------------------------+---------------------------------+
-|During network/subnet/router create, |Yes |Two new Subnet attributes were |
-|there should be an option to allow | |introduced to control IPv6 |
-|user to specify the type of address | |address assignment options: |
-|management they would like. This | | |
-|includes all options including those | |* ``ipv6-ra-mode``: to determine |
-|low priority if implemented (e.g., | | who sends Router Advertisements|
-|toggle on/off router and address | | |
-|prefix advertisements); It must be | |* ``ipv6-address-mode``: to |
-|supported via Neutron API (REST and | | determine how VM obtains IPv6 |
-|CLI) as well as via Horizon | | address, default gateway, and/ |
-| | | or optional information. |
-+-------------------------------------+-------------------------+---------------------------------+
-|Security groups anti-spoofing: |Yes | |
-|Prevent VM from using a source | | |
-|IPv6/MAC address which is not | | |
-|assigned to the VM | | |
-+-------------------------------------+-------------------------+---------------------------------+
-|Protect tenant and provider network |Yes |When using a tenant network, |
-|from rough RAs | |Neutron is going to automatically|
-| | |handle the filter rules to allow |
-| | |connectivity of RAs to the VMs |
-| | |only from the Neutron router |
-| | |port; with provider networks, |
-| | |users are required to specify the|
-| | |LLA of the upstream router during|
-| | |the subnet creation, or otherwise|
-| | |manually edit the security-groups|
-| | |rules to allow incoming traffic |
-| | |from this specific address. |
-+-------------------------------------+-------------------------+---------------------------------+
-|Support the ability to assign |Yes | |
-|multiple IPv6 addresses to an | | |
-|interface; both for Neutron router | | |
-|interfaces and VM interfaces. | | |
-+-------------------------------------+-------------------------+---------------------------------+
-|Ability for a VM to support a mix of |Yes | |
-|multiple IPv4 and IPv6 networks, | | |
-|including multiples of the same type.| | |
-+-------------------------------------+-------------------------+---------------------------------+
-|Support for IPv6 Prefix Delegation. |**Roadmap** |Some partial support is available|
-| | |in Liberty release |
-+-------------------------------------+-------------------------+---------------------------------+
-|Distributed Virtual Routing (DVR) |**No** |Blueprint proposed upstream, |
-|support for IPv6 | |pending discussion |
-+-------------------------------------+-------------------------+---------------------------------+
-|IPv6 First-Hop Security, IPv6 ND |**Roadmap** |Supported in Liberty release |
-|spoofing. | | |
-+-------------------------------------+-------------------------+---------------------------------+
-|IPv6 support in Neutron Layer3 High |Yes | |
-|Availability (keepalived+VRRP). | | |
-+-------------------------------------+-------------------------+---------------------------------+
+.. table::
+ :class: longtable
+ +-------------------------------------+-------------------------+---------------------------------+
+ |Use Case / Requirement |Supported in Neutron |Notes |
+ +=====================================+=========================+=================================+
+ |All topologies work in a multi-tenant|Yes |The IPv6 design is following the |
+ |environment | |Neutron tenant networks model; |
+ | | |dnsmasq is being used inside DHCP|
+ | | |network namespaces, while radvd |
+ | | |is being used inside Neutron |
+ | | |routers namespaces to provide |
+ | | |full isolation between tenants. |
+ | | |Tenant isolation can be based on |
+ | | |VLANs, GRE, or VXLAN |
+ | | |encapsulation. In case of |
+ | | |overlays, the transport network |
+ | | |(and VTEPs) must be IPv4 based as|
+ | | |of today. |
+ +-------------------------------------+-------------------------+---------------------------------+
+ |IPv6 VM to VM only |Yes |It is possible to assign IPv6- |
+ | | |only addresses to VMs. Both |
+ | | |switching (within VMs on the same|
+ | | |tenant network) as well as east/ |
+ | | |west routing (between different |
+ | | |networks of the same tenant) are |
+ | | |supported. |
+ +-------------------------------------+-------------------------+---------------------------------+
+ |IPv6 external L2 VLAN directly |Yes |IPv6 provider network model; RA |
+ |attached to a VM | |messages from upstream (external)|
+ | | |router are forwarded into the VMs|
+ +-------------------------------------+-------------------------+---------------------------------+
+ |IPv6 subnet routed via L3 agent to an| |Configuration is enhanced in Kilo|
+ |external IPv6 network | |to allow easier setup of the |
+ | |1. Yes |upstream gateway, without the |
+ |1. Both VLAN and overlay (e.g. GRE, | |user forced to create an IPv6 |
+ | VXLAN) subnet attached to VMs; | |subnet for the external network. |
+ |2. Must be able to support multiple |2. Yes | |
+ | L3 agents for a given external | | |
+ | network to support scaling | | |
+ | (neutron scheduler to assign | | |
+ | vRouters to the L3 agents) | | |
+ +-------------------------------------+-------------------------+---------------------------------+
+ |Ability for a NIC to support both | |Dual-stack is supported in |
+ |IPv4 and IPv6 (dual stack) address. | |Neutron with the addition of |
+ | | |``Multiple IPv6 Prefixes`` |
+ |1. VM with a single interface |1. Yes |Blueprint |
+ | associated with a network, which | | |
+ | is then associated with two | | |
+ | subnets | | |
+ |2. VM with two different interfaces |2. Yes | |
+ | associated with two different | | |
+ | networks and two different subnets| | |
+ +-------------------------------------+-------------------------+---------------------------------+
+ |Support IPv6 Address assignment modes|1. Yes | |
+ | | | |
+ |1. SLAAC |2. Yes | |
+ |2. DHCPv6 Stateless | | |
+ |3. DHCPv6 Stateful |3. Yes | |
+ +-------------------------------------+-------------------------+---------------------------------+
+ |Ability to create a port on an IPv6 |Yes | |
+ |DHCPv6 Stateful subnet and assign a | | |
+ |specific IPv6 address to the port and| | |
+ |have it taken out of the DHCP address| | |
+ |pool. | | |
+ +-------------------------------------+-------------------------+---------------------------------+
+ |Ability to create a port with |**No** |The following patch disables this|
+ |fixed_ip for a SLAAC/DHCPv6-Stateless| |operation: https://review.opensta|
+ |Subnet. | |ck.org/#/c/129144/ |
+ +-------------------------------------+-------------------------+---------------------------------+
+ |Support for private IPv6 to external |**Rejected** |Blueprint proposed in upstream |
+ |IPv6 floating IP; Ability to specify | |and got rejected. General |
+ |floating IPs via Neutron API (REST | |expectation is to avoid NAT with |
+ |and CLI) as well as via Horizon, | |IPv6 by assigning GUA to tenant |
+ |including combination of IPv6/IPv4 | |VMs. See https://review.openstack|
+ |and IPv4/IPv6 floating IPs if | |.org/#/c/139731/ for discussion. |
+ |implemented. | | |
+ +-------------------------------------+-------------------------+---------------------------------+
+ |Provide IPv6/IPv4 feature parity in |**To-Do** |The L3 configuration should be |
+ |support for pass-through capabilities| |transparent for the SR-IOV |
+ |(e.g., SR-IOV). | |implementation. SR-IOV networking|
+ | | |support introduced in Juno based |
+ | | |on the ``sriovnicswitch`` ML2 |
+ | | |driver is expected to work with |
+ | | |IPv4 and IPv6 enabled VMs. We |
+ | | |need to verify if it works or not|
+ +-------------------------------------+-------------------------+---------------------------------+
+ |Additional IPv6 extensions, for |**No** |It does not appear to be |
+ |example: IPSEC, IPv6 Anycast, | |considered yet (lack of clear |
+ |Multicast | |requirements) |
+ +-------------------------------------+-------------------------+---------------------------------+
+ |VM access to the meta-data server to |**No** |This is currently not supported. |
+ |obtain user data, SSH keys, etc. | |Config-drive or dual-stack IPv4/ |
+ |using cloud-init with IPv6 only | |IPv6 can be used as a workaround |
+ |interfaces. | |(so that the IPv4 network is used|
+ | | |to obtain connectivity with the |
+ | | |metadata service) |
+ +-------------------------------------+-------------------------+---------------------------------+
+ |Full support for IPv6 matching (i.e.,|Yes | |
+ |IPv6, ICMPv6, TCP, UDP) in security | | |
+ |groups. Ability to control and manage| | |
+ |all IPv6 security group capabilities | | |
+ |via Neutron/Nova API (REST and CLI) | | |
+ |as well as via Horizon. | | |
+ +-------------------------------------+-------------------------+---------------------------------+
+ |During network/subnet/router create, |Yes |Two new Subnet attributes were |
+ |there should be an option to allow | |introduced to control IPv6 |
+ |user to specify the type of address | |address assignment options: |
+ |management they would like. This | | |
+ |includes all options including those | |* ``ipv6-ra-mode``: to determine |
+ |low priority if implemented (e.g., | | who sends Router Advertisements|
+ |toggle on/off router and address | | |
+ |prefix advertisements); It must be | |* ``ipv6-address-mode``: to |
+ |supported via Neutron API (REST and | | determine how VM obtains IPv6 |
+ |CLI) as well as via Horizon | | address, default gateway, and/ |
+ | | | or optional information. |
+ +-------------------------------------+-------------------------+---------------------------------+
+ |Security groups anti-spoofing: |Yes | |
+ |Prevent VM from using a source | | |
+ |IPv6/MAC address which is not | | |
+ |assigned to the VM | | |
+ +-------------------------------------+-------------------------+---------------------------------+
+ |Protect tenant and provider network |Yes |When using a tenant network, |
+ |from rough RAs | |Neutron is going to automatically|
+ | | |handle the filter rules to allow |
+ | | |connectivity of RAs to the VMs |
+ | | |only from the Neutron router |
+ | | |port; with provider networks, |
+ | | |users are required to specify the|
+ | | |LLA of the upstream router during|
+ | | |the subnet creation, or otherwise|
+ | | |manually edit the security-groups|
+ | | |rules to allow incoming traffic |
+ | | |from this specific address. |
+ +-------------------------------------+-------------------------+---------------------------------+
+ |Support the ability to assign |Yes | |
+ |multiple IPv6 addresses to an | | |
+ |interface; both for Neutron router | | |
+ |interfaces and VM interfaces. | | |
+ +-------------------------------------+-------------------------+---------------------------------+
+ |Ability for a VM to support a mix of |Yes | |
+ |multiple IPv4 and IPv6 networks, | | |
+ |including multiples of the same type.| | |
+ +-------------------------------------+-------------------------+---------------------------------+
+ |Support for IPv6 Prefix Delegation. |**Roadmap** |Some partial support is available|
+ | | |in Liberty release |
+ +-------------------------------------+-------------------------+---------------------------------+
+ |Distributed Virtual Routing (DVR) |**No** |Blueprint proposed upstream, |
+ |support for IPv6 | |pending discussion |
+ +-------------------------------------+-------------------------+---------------------------------+
+ |IPv6 First-Hop Security, IPv6 ND |**Roadmap** |Supported in Liberty release |
+ |spoofing. | | |
+ +-------------------------------------+-------------------------+---------------------------------+
+ |IPv6 support in Neutron Layer3 High |Yes | |
+ |Availability (keepalived+VRRP). | | |
+ +-------------------------------------+-------------------------+---------------------------------+