Move files from doc to docs

Move files to docs for automation html release.

JIRA:ESCALATOR-27

Change-Id: I3654b18ad6c7fc94614fd55afe5e3140bf467752
Signed-off-by: zhang-jun3g <zhang.jun3g@zte.com.cn>

1 files changed, 49 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/docs/A1-Appendix.rst b/docs/A1-Appendix.rst
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..85f0717
--- /dev/null
+++ b/docs/A1-Appendix.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
+Appendix
+--------
+
+A.1 Impact Analysis
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+Upgrading the different software modules may cause different impact on
+the availability of the infrastructure resources and even on the service
+continuity of the vNFs.
+
+**Software modules in the computing nodes**
+
+#. Host OS patch
+
+#. Hypervisor, such as KVM, QEMU, XEN, libvirt
+#. Openstack agent in computing nodes (like Nova agent, Ceilometer
+   agent...)
+   
+.. <MT> As SW module, we should list the host OS and maybe its
+   drivers as well. From upgrade perspective do we limit host OS
+   upgrades to patches only?
+
+**Software modules in network nodes**
+
+#. Neutron L2/L3 agent
+#. OVS, SR-IOV Driver
+
+**Software modules storage nodes**
+
+#. Ceph
+
+The table below analyses such an impact - considering a single instance
+of each software module - from the following aspects:
+
+-  the function which will be lost during upgrade,
+-  the duration of the loss of this specific function,
+-  if this causes the loss of the vNF function,
+-  if it causes incompatibility in the different parts of the software,
+-  what should be backed up before the upgrade,
+-  the duration of restoration time if the upgrade fails
+
+These values provided come from internal testing and based on some
+assumptions, they may vary depending on the deployment techniques.
+Please feel free to add if you find more efficient values during your
+testing.
+
+https://wiki.opnfv.org/_media/upgrade_analysis_v0.5.xlsx
+
+Note that no redundancy of the software modules is considered in the table.