Merge "Port status update"

1 files changed, 32 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/docs/design/rfe-port-status-update.rst b/docs/design/rfe-port-status-update.rst
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..d87d7d7b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/docs/design/rfe-port-status-update.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
+.. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
+.. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
+
+==========================
+Neutron Port Status Update
+==========================
+
+.. NOTE::
+   This document represents a Neutron RFE reviewed in the Doctor project before submitting upstream to Launchpad Neutron
+   space. The document is not intended to follow a blueprint format or to be an extensive document.
+   For more information, please visit http://docs.openstack.org/developer/neutron/policies/blueprints.html
+
+   The RFE was submitted to Neutron. You can follow the discussions in https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1598081
+
+Neutron port status field represents the current status of a port in the cloud infrastructure. The field can take one of
+the following values: 'ACTIVE', 'DOWN', 'BUILD' and 'ERROR'.
+
+At present, if a network event occurs in the data-plane (e.g. virtual or physical switch fails or one of its ports,
+cable gets pulled unintentionally, infrastructure topology changes, etc.), connectivity to logical ports may be affected
+and tenants' services interrupted. When tenants/cloud administrators are looking up their resources' status (e.g. Nova
+instances and services running in them, network ports, etc.), they will wrongly see everything looks fine. The problem
+is that Neutron will continue reporting port 'status' as 'ACTIVE'.
+
+Many SDN Controllers managing network elements have the ability to detect and report network events to upper layers.
+This allows SDN Controllers' users to be notified of changes and react accordingly. Such information could be consumed
+by Neutron so that Neutron could update the 'status' field of those logical ports, and additionally generate a
+notification message to the message bus.
+
+However, Neutron misses a way to be able to receive such information through e.g. ML2 driver or the REST API ('status'
+field is read-only). There are pros and cons on both of these approaches as well as other possible approaches. This RFE
+intends to trigger a discussion on how Neutron could be improved to receive fault/change events from SDN Controllers or
+even also from 3rd parties not in charge of controlling the network (e.g. monitoring systems, human admins).