diff options
author | Zhijiang Hu <hu.zhijiang@zte.com.cn> | 2017-03-31 04:39:29 -0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | Zhijiang Hu <hu.zhijiang@zte.com.cn> | 2017-04-06 06:25:10 -0400 |
commit | a051fc3bf0ea4cd589b663e974517633563a4ed8 (patch) | |
tree | f73cda6a4c4051ad87a3fb8ff192861a460bb629 /docs | |
parent | d17daf1af5056040e5399af814ebd850a70a4a75 (diff) |
Add multicast spec
Change-Id: I3f9b9167864126b7b455761799dc79c40c394854
Signed-off-by: Zhijiang Hu <hu.zhijiang@zte.com.cn>
Diffstat (limited to 'docs')
-rw-r--r-- | docs/developer/design/multicast.rst | 278 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | docs/developer/spec/multicast.rst | 190 |
2 files changed, 468 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/docs/developer/design/multicast.rst b/docs/developer/design/multicast.rst new file mode 100644 index 00000000..89422fe6 --- /dev/null +++ b/docs/developer/design/multicast.rst @@ -0,0 +1,278 @@ +Detailed Design +=============== + +Protocol Design +--------------- + +1. All Protocol headers are 1 byte long or align to 4 bytes. +2. Packet size should not exceed above 1500(MTU) bytes including UDP/IP header and should +be align to 4 bytes. In future, MTU can be modified larger than 1500(Jumbo Frame) through +cmd line option to enlarge the data throughput. + +/* Packet header definition (align to 4 bytes) */ +struct packet_ctl { + uint32_t seq; // packet seq number start from 0, unique in server life cycle. + uint32_t crc; // checksum + uint32_t data_size; // payload length + uint8_t data[0]; +}; + +/* Buffer info definition (align to 4 bytes) */ +struct buffer_ctl { + uint32_t buffer_id; // buffer seq number start from 0, unique in server life cycle. + uint32_t buffer_size; // payload total length of a buffer + uint32_t packet_id_base; // seq number of the first packet in this buffer. + uint32_t pkt_count; // number of packet in this buffer, 0 means EOF. +}; + + +3. 1-byte-long header definition + +Signals such as the four below are 1 byte long, to simplify the receive process(since it +cannot be spitted ). + +#define CLIENT_READY 0x1 +#define CLIENT_REQ 0x2 +#define CLIENT_DONE 0x4 +#define SERVER_SENT 0x8 + +Note: Please see the collaboration diagram for their meanings. + +4. Retransmission Request Header + +/* Retransmition Request Header (align to 4 bytes) */ +struct request_ctl { + uint32_t req_count; // How many seqs below. + uint32_t seqs[0]; // packet seqs. +}; + +5. Buffer operations + +void buffer_init(); // Init the buffer_ctl structure and all(say 1024) packet_ctl +structures. Allocate buffer memory. +long buffer_fill(int fd); // fill a buffer from fd, such as stdin +long buffer_flush(int fd); // flush a buffer to fd, say stdout +struct packet_ctl *packet_put(struct packet_ctl *new_pkt);// put a packet to a buffer +and return a free memory slot for the next packet. +struct packet_ctl *packet_get(uint32_t seq);// get a packet data in buffer by +indicating the packet seq. + + +How to sync between server threads +---------------------------------- + +If children's aaa() operation need to wait the parents's init() to be done, then do it +literally like this: + + UDP Server + TCP Server1 = spawn( )----> TCP Server1 + init() + TCP Server2 = spawn( )-----> TCP Server2 + V(sem)----------------------> P(sem) // No child any more + V(sem)---------------------> P(sem) + aaa() // No need to V(sem), for no child + aaa() + +If parent's send() operation need to wait the children's ready() done, then do it +literally too, but is a reverse way: + + UDP Server TCP Server1 TCP Server2 + // No child any more + ready() ready() + P(sem) <--------------------- V(sem) + P(sem) <------------------ V(sem) + send() + +Note that the aaa() and ready() operations above run in parallel. If this is not the +case due to race condition, the sequence above can be modified into this below: + + UDP Server TCP Server1 TCP Server2 + // No child any more + ready() + P(sem) <--------------------- V(sem) + ready() + P(sem) <------------------- V(sem) + send() + + +In order to implement such chained/zipper sync pattern, a pair of semaphores is +needed between the parent and the child. One is used by child to wait parent , the +other is used by parent to wait child. semaphore pair can be allocated by parent +and pass the pointer to the child over spawn() operation such as pthread_create(). + +/* semaphore pair definition */ +struct semaphores { + sem_t wait_parent; + sem_t wait_child; +}; + +Then the semaphore pair can be recorded by threads by using the semlink struct below: +struct semlink { + struct semaphores *this; /* used by parent to point to the struct semaphores + which it created during spawn child. */ + struct semaphores *parent; /* used by child to point to the struct + semaphores which it created by parent */ +}; + +chained/zipper sync API: + +void sl_wait_child(struct semlink *sl); +void sl_release_child(struct semlink *sl); +void sl_wait_parent(struct semlink *sl); +void sl_release_parent(struct semlink *sl); + +API usage is like this. + +Thread1(root parent) Thread2(child) Thread3(grandchild) +sl_wait_parent(noop op) +sl_release_child + +---------->sl_wait_parent + sl_release_child + +-----------> sl_wait_parent + sl_release_child(noop op) + ... + sl_wait_child(noop op) + + sl_release_parent + sl_wait_child <------------- + + sl_release_parent +sl_wait_child <------------ +sl_release_parent(noop op) + +API implementation: + +void sl_wait_child(struct semlink *sl) +{ + if (sl->this) { + P(sl->this->wait_child); + } +} + +void sl_release_child(struct semlink *sl) +{ + if (sl->this) { + V(sl->this->wait_parent); + } +} + +void sl_wait_parent(struct semlink *sl) +{ + if (sl->parent) { + P(sl->parent->wait_parent); + } +} + +void sl_release_parent(struct semlink *sl) +{ + if (sl->parent) { + V(sl->parent->wait_child); + } +} + +Client flow chart +----------------- +See Collaboration Diagram + +UDP thread flow chart +--------------------- +See Collaboration Diagram + +TCP thread flow chart +--------------------- + + +S_INIT --- (UDP initialized) ---> S_ACCEPT --- (accept clients) --+ + | + /----------------------------------------------------------------/ + V +S_PREP --- (UDP prepared abuffer) + ^ | + | \--> S_SYNC --- (clients ClIENT_READY) + | | + | \--> S_SEND --- (clients CLIENT_DONE) + | | + | V + \---------------(bufferctl.pkt_count != 0)-----------------------+ + | + V + exit() <--- (bufferctl.pkt_count == 0) + + +TCP using poll and message queue +-------------------------------- + +TCP uses poll() to sync with client's events as well as output event from itself, so +that we can use non-block socket operations to reduce the latency. POLLIN means there +are message from client and POLLOUT means we are ready to send message/retransmission +packets to client. + +poll main loop pseudo code: +void check_clients(struct server_status_data *sdata) +{ + poll_events = poll(&(sdata->ds[1]), sdata->ccount - 1, timeout); + + /* check all connected clients */ + for (sdata->cindex = 1; sdata->cindex < sdata->ccount; sdata->cindex++) { + ds = &(sdata->ds[sdata->cindex]); + if (!ds->revents) { + continue; + } + + if (ds->revents & (POLLERR|POLLHUP|POLLNVAL)) { + handle_error_event(sdata); + } else if (ds->revents & (POLLIN|POLLPRI)) { + handle_pullin_event(sdata); // may set POLLOUT into ds->events + // to trigger handle_pullout_event(). + } else if (ds->revents & POLLOUT) { + handle_pullout_event(sdata); + } + } +} + +For TCP, since the message from client may not complete and send data may be also +interrupted due to non-block fashion, there should be one send message queue and a +receive message queue on the server side for each client (client do not use non-block +operations). + +TCP message queue definition: + +struct tcpq { + struct qmsg *head, *tail; + long count; /* message count in a queue */ + long size; /* Total data size of a queue */ +}; + +TCP message queue item definition: + +struct qmsg { + struct qmsg *next; + void *data; + long size; +}; + +TCP message queue API: + +// Allocate and init a queue. +struct tcpq * tcpq_queue_init(void); + +// Free a queue. +void tcpq_queue_free(struct tcpq *q); + +// Return queue length. +long tcpq_queue_dsize(struct tcpq *q); + +// queue new message to tail. +void tcpq_queue_tail(struct tcpq *q, void *data, long size); + +// queue message that cannot be sent currently back to queue head. +void tcpq_queue_head(struct tcpq *q, void *data, long size); + +// get one piece from queue head. +void * tcpq_dequeue_head(struct tcpq *q, long *size); + +// Serialize all pieces of a queue, and move it out of queue, to ease the further +//operation on it. +void * tcpq_dqueue_flat(struct tcpq *q, long *size); + +// Serialize all pieces of a queue, do not move it out of queue, to ease the further +//operation on it. +void * tcpq_queue_flat_peek(struct tcpq *q, long *size); diff --git a/docs/developer/spec/multicast.rst b/docs/developer/spec/multicast.rst new file mode 100644 index 00000000..ba314d3a --- /dev/null +++ b/docs/developer/spec/multicast.rst @@ -0,0 +1,190 @@ +Requirement +=========== +1. When deploying a large OPNFV/OpenStack cluster, we would like to take the advantage of UDP +multicast to prevent the network bottleneck when distributing Kolla container from one +Installer Server to all target hosts by using unicast. + +2. When it comes to auto scaling (extension) of compute nodes, use unicast is acceptable, since +the number of nodes in this condition is usually small. + +The basic step to introduce multicast to deployment is: +a. Still setup the monopolistic docker registry server on Daisy server as a failsafe. +b. Daisy server, as the multicast server, prepares the image file to be transmitted, and count +how many target hosts(as the multicast clients)that should receive the image file +simultaneously. +c. Multicast clients tell the multicast server about ready to receive the image. +d. Multicast server transmits image over UDP multicast channel. +e. Multicast clients report success after received the whole image. +f. Setup docker registry server on each target hosts based upon received docker image. +g. Setup Kolla ansible to use 127.0.0.1 as the registry server IP so that the real docker +container retrieving network activities only take place inside target hosts. + + +Design +====== + +Methods to achieve +------------------ + +TIPC +++++ + +TIPC or its wrapper such as ZeroMQ is good at multicast, but it is not suitable as an +installer: +1. The default TIPC kernel module equipped by CentOS7(kernel verison 3.10) is NOT stable +especially in L3 multicast(although we can use L2 multicast, but the network will be limited to +L2). If errors happen, it is hard for us to recover a node from kernel panic. + +2. TIPC's design is based on a stable node cluster environment, esp in Lossless Ethernet. But +the real environment is generally not in that case. When multicast is broken, Installer should +switch to unicast, but TIPC currently do not have such capability. + +Top level design +---------------- +1. There are two kinds of thread on the server side, one is UDP multicast thread the other is +TCP sync/retransmit thread. There will be more than one TCP threads since one TCP thread can +only serve a limited client (say 64~128) in order to limit the CPU load and unicast retransmit +network usage. + +2. There is only one thread on client side. + +3. All the packets that a client lost during UDP multicast will be request by client to the TCP +thread and resend by using TCP unicast, if unicast still cannot deliver the packets successfully, +the client will failback to using the monopolistic docker registry server on Daisy server as a +failsafe option. + +4. Each packet needs checksum. + + +UDP Server Design (runs on Daisy Server) +---------------------------------------- + +1. Multicast group IP and Port should be configurable, as well as the interface that will be +used as the egress of the multicast packets. The user will pass the interface's IP as the +handle to find the egress. + +2. Image data to be sent is passed to server through stdin. + +3. Consider the size of image is large (xGB), the server cannot pre-allocate whole buffer to +hold all image at once. Besides, since the data is from stdin and the actual length is +unpredictable. So the server should split the data into small size buffers and send to the +clients one by one. Furthermore, buffer shall be divided into packets which size is MTU +including the UDP/IP header. Then the buffer size can be , for example 1024 * MTU including the +UDP/IP header. + +4. After sending one buffer to client the server should stop and get feedback from client to +see if all clients have got all packets in that buffer. If any clients lost any buffer, client +should request the server to resend packets from a more stable way(TCP). + +5. when got the EOF from stdin, server should send a buffer which size is 0 as an EOF signal to +the client to let it know about the end of sending. + + +TCP Server Design (runs on Daisy Server) +---------------------------------------- + +1. All TCP server threads and the only one UDP thread share one process. The UDP thread is the +parent thread, and the first TCP thread is the child, while the second TCP thread is the +grandchild, and so on. Thus, for each TCP thread, there is only one parent and at most one +child. + +2. TCP thread accepts the connect request from client. The number of client is predefined by +server cmdline parameter. Each TCP thread connect with at most ,say 64 clients, if there are +more clients to be connected to, then a child TCP thread is spawned by the parent. + +3. Before UDP thread sending any buffer to client, all TCP threads should send UDP multicast +IP/Port information to their clients beforehand. + +4. During each buffer sending cycle, TCP threads send a special protocol message to tell +clients about the size/id of the buffer and id of each packet in it. After getting +acknowledgements from all clients, TCP threads then signal the UDP thread to start +multicasting buffer over UDP. After multicasting finished, TCP threads notifies clients +multicast is done, and wait acknowledgements from clients again. If clients requests +retransmission, then it is the responsibility of TCP threads to resend packets over unicast. +If no retransmission needed, then clients should signal TCP threads that they are ready for +the next buffer to come. + +5. Repeat step 4 if buffer size is not 0 in the last round, otherwise, TCP server shutdown +connection and exit. + + +Server cmdline usage example +---------------------------- + +./server <local_ip> <number_of_clients> [port] < kolla_image.tgz + +<local_ip> is used here to specify the multicast egress interface. But which interface will be +used by TCP is leaved to route table to decide. +<number_of_clients> indicates the number of clients , thus the number of target hosts which +need to receive the image. +[port] is the port that will be used by both UDP and TCP. Default value can be used if user +does not provide it. + + +Client Design(Target Host side) +-------------------------------- + +1. Each target hosts has only one client process. + +2. Client connect to TCP server according to the cmdline parameters right after start up. + +3. After connecting to TCP server, client first read from TCP server the multicast group +information which can be used to create the multicast receive socket then. + +4. During each buffer receiving cycle, the client first read from TCP server the buffer info, +prepare the receive buffer, and acknowledge the TCP server that it is ready to receive. Then, +client receive buffer from the multicast socket until TCP server notifying the end of +multicast. By compare the buffer info and the received packets, the client knows whether to +send the retransmission request or not and whether to wait retransmission packet or not. +After all packets are received from UDP/TCP, the client eventually flush buffer to stdout +and tells the TCP server about ready to receive the next buffer. + +5. Repeat step 4 if buffer size is not 0 in the last round, otherwise, client shutdowns +connection and exit. + +Client cmdline usage example +---------------------------- + +./client <local_ip> <server_ip> [port] > kolla_image.tgz + +<local_ip> is used here to specify the multicast ingress interface. But which interface +will be used by TCP is leaved to route table to decide. +<server_ip> indicates the TCP server IP to be connected to. +[port] is the port that will be used by both connect to TCP server and receive multicast +data. + + +Collaboration diagram among UDP Server, TCP Server(illustrate only one TCP thread) +and Clients: + + +UDP Server TCP Server Client + | | | +init mcast group +init mcast send socket + ----------------------------------> + accept clients + <------------------------connet------------------ + --------------------send mcast group info-------> + <---------------------------------- + state = PREP +do { +read data from stdin +prepare one buffer + -----------------------------------> + state = SYNC + -------------------send buffer info--------------> + <----------------------send ClIENT_READY----------- + <---------------------------------- + state = SEND + + ================================================send buffer over UDP multicast======> + -----------------------------------> + -----------------------send SERVER_SENT-----------> + [<-------------------send CLIENT_REQUEST----------] + [--------------send buffer over TCP unicast------>] + flush buffer to stdout + <-------------------send CLIENT_DONE--------------- + <---------------------------------- + state = PREP +while (buffer.len != 0) |