summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/rubbos/app/tomcat-connectors-1.2.32-src/xdocs/ajp/ajpv13a.xml
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'rubbos/app/tomcat-connectors-1.2.32-src/xdocs/ajp/ajpv13a.xml')
-rw-r--r--rubbos/app/tomcat-connectors-1.2.32-src/xdocs/ajp/ajpv13a.xml698
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 698 deletions
diff --git a/rubbos/app/tomcat-connectors-1.2.32-src/xdocs/ajp/ajpv13a.xml b/rubbos/app/tomcat-connectors-1.2.32-src/xdocs/ajp/ajpv13a.xml
deleted file mode 100644
index 3ab4502d..00000000
--- a/rubbos/app/tomcat-connectors-1.2.32-src/xdocs/ajp/ajpv13a.xml
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,698 +0,0 @@
-<?xml version="1.0"?>
-<!DOCTYPE document [
- <!ENTITY project SYSTEM "project.xml">
-]>
-<document url="ajpv13a.html">
-
- &project;
- <copyright>
- Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
- contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with
- this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership.
- The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0
- (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with
- the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at
-
- http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
-
- Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
- distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
- WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
- See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
- limitations under the License.
-</copyright>
-<properties>
-<title>AJPv13</title>
-<author email="danmil@shore.net">danmil@shore.net</author>
-<author email="jfrederic.clere@fujitsu-siemens.com">Jean-Frederic Clere</author>
-<date>$Date: 2007-06-09 22:38:06 +0200 (Sat, 09 Jun 2007) $</date>
-</properties>
-<body>
-<section name="Intro">
-
-<p>
-The original document was written by
-Dan Milstein, <author email="danmil@shore.net">danmil@shore.net</author>
-on December 2000. The present document is generated out of an xml file
-to allow a more easy integration in the Tomcat documentation.
-
-</p>
-
-<p>
-This describes the Apache JServ Protocol version 1.3 (hereafter
-<b>ajp13</b>). There is, apparently, no current documentation of how the
-protocol works. This document is an attempt to remedy that, in order to
-make life easier for maintainers of JK, and for anyone who wants to
-port the protocol somewhere (into jakarta 4.x, for example).
-</p>
-
-</section>
-
-<section name="author">
-
-<p>
-I am not one of the designers of this protocol -- I believe that Gal
-Shachor was the original designer. Everything in this document is derived
-from the actual implementation I found in the tomcat 3.x code. I hope it
-is useful, but I can't make any grand claims to perfect accuracy. I also
-don't know why certain design decisions were made. Where I was able, I've
-offered some possible justifications for certain choices, but those are
-only my guesses. In general, the C code which Shachor wrote is very clean
-and comprehensible (if almost totally undocumented). I've cleaned up the
-Java code, and I think it's reasonably readable.
-</p>
-</section>
-
-<section name="Design Goals">
-
-<p>
-According to email from Gal Shachor to the jakarta-dev mailing list,
-the original goals of <b>JK</b> (and thus <b>ajp13</b>) were to extend
-<b>mod_jserv</b> and <b>ajp12</b> by (I am only including the goals which
-relate to communication between the web server and the servlet container):
-
-<ul>
- <li> Increasing performance (speed, specifically). </li>
-
- <li> Adding support for SSL, so that <code>isSecure()</code> and
- <code>getScheme()</code> will function correctly within the servlet
- container. The client certificates and cipher suite will be
- available to servlets as request attributes. </li>
-
-</ul>
-</p>
-</section>
-
-<section name="Overview of the protocol">
-
-<p>
-The <b>ajp13</b> protocol is packet-oriented. A binary format was
-presumably chosen over the more readable plain text for reasons of
-performance. The web server communicates with the servlet container over
-TCP connections. To cut down on the expensive process of socket creation,
-the web server will attempt to maintain persistent TCP connections to the
-servlet container, and to reuse a connection for multiple request/response
-cycles.
-</p><p>
-Once a connection is assigned to a particular request, it will not be
-used for any others until the request-handling cycle has terminated. In
-other words, requests are not multiplexed over connections. This makes
-for much simpler code at either end of the connection, although it does
-cause more connections to be open at once.
-</p><p>
-Once the web server has opened a connection to the servlet container,
-the connection can be in one of the following states:
-</p><p>
-<ul>
- <li> Idle <br/> No request is being handled over this connection. </li>
- <li> Assigned <br/> The connecton is handling a specific request.</li>
-</ul>
-
-</p><p>
-Once a connection is assigned to handle a particular request, the basic
-request informaton (e.g. HTTP headers, etc) is sent over the connection in
-a highly condensed form (e.g. common strings are encoded as integers).
-Details of that format are below in Request Packet Structure. If there is a
-body to the request (content-length > 0), that is sent in a separate
-packet immediately after.
-</p><p>
-At this point, the servlet container is presumably ready to start
-processing the request. As it does so, it can send the
-following messages back to the web server:
-
-<ul>
- <li>SEND_HEADERS <br/>Send a set of headers back to the browser.</li>
-
- <li>SEND_BODY_CHUNK <br/>Send a chunk of body data back to the browser.</li>
-
- <li>GET_BODY_CHUNK <br/>Get further data from the request if it hasn't all
- been transferred yet. This is necessary because the packets have a fixed
- maximum size and arbitrary amounts of data can be included the body of a
- request (for uploaded files, for example). (Note: this is unrelated to
- HTTP chunked tranfer).</li>
-
- <li>END_RESPONSE <br/> Finish the request-handling cycle.</li>
-</ul>
-</p><p>
-
-Each message is accompanied by a differently formatted packet of data. See
-Response Packet Structures below for details.
-</p>
-</section>
-
-<section name="Basic Packet Structure">
-
-<p>
-There is a bit of an XDR heritage to this protocol, but it differs in
-lots of ways (no 4 byte alignment, for example).
-</p><p>
-Byte order: I am not clear about the endian-ness of the individual
-bytes. I'm guessing the bytes are little-endian, because that's what XDR
-specifies, and I'm guessing that sys/socket library is magically making
-that so (on the C side). If anyone with a better knowledge of socket calls
-can step in, that would be great.
-</p><p>
-There are four data types in the protocol: bytes, booleans, integers and
-strings.
-
-<dl>
- <dt><b>Byte</b></dt>
- <dd>A single byte.</dd>
-
- <dt><b>Boolean</b></dt>
- <dd>A single byte, 1 = true, 0 = false. Using other non-zero values as
- true (i.e. C-style) may work in some places, but it won't in
- others.</dd>
-
- <dt><b>Integer</b></dt>
- <dd>A number in the range of 0 to 2^16 (32768). Stored in 2 bytes with
- the high-order byte first.</dd>
-
- <dt><b>String</b></dt>
- <dd>A variable-sized string (length bounded by 2^16). Encoded with the
- length packed into two bytes first, followed by the string (including the
- terminating '\0'). Note that the encoded length does <b>not</b> include
- the trailing '\0' -- it is like <code>strlen</code>. This is a touch
- confusing on the Java side, which is littered with odd autoincrement
- statements to skip over these terminators. I believe the reason this was
- done was to allow the C code to be extra efficient when reading strings
- which the servlet container is sending back -- with the terminating \0
- character, the C code can pass around references into a single buffer,
- without copying. If the \0 was missing, the C code would have to copy
- things out in order to get its notion of a string. Note a size of -1
- (65535) indicates a null string and no data follow the length in this
- case.</dd>
-</dl>
-</p>
-
-<subsection name="Packet Size">
-<p>
-According to much of the code, the max packet
-size is 8 * 1024 bytes (8K). The actual length of the packet is encoded in the
-header.
-</p>
-</subsection>
-
-<subsection name="Packet Headers">
-<p>
-Packets sent from the server to the container begin with
-<code>0x1234</code>. Packets sent from the container to the server begin
-with <code>AB</code> (that's the ASCII code for A followed by the ASCII
-code for B). After those first two bytes, there is an integer (encoded as
-above) with the length of the payload. Although this might suggest that
-the maximum payload could be as large as 2^16, in fact, the code sets the
-maximum to be 8K.
-
-
-<table>
- <tr>
- <th colspan="6">Packet Format (Server->Container)</th>
- </tr>
-
- <tr>
- <th>Byte</th>
- <td>0</td>
- <td>1</td>
- <td>2</td>
- <td>3</td>
- <td>4...(n+3)</td>
- </tr>
-
- <tr>
- <th>Contents</th>
- <td>0x12</td>
- <td>0x34</td>
- <td colspan="2">Data Length (n)</td>
- <td>Data</td>
- </tr>
-</table>
-
-<table>
- <tr>
- <th colspan="6"><b>Packet Format (Container->Server)</b></th>
- </tr>
-
- <tr>
- <th>Byte</th>
- <td>0</td>
- <td>1</td>
- <td>2</td>
- <td>3</td>
- <td>4...(n+3)</td>
- </tr>
-
- <tr>
- <th>Contents</th>
- <td>A</td>
- <td>B</td>
- <td colspan="2">Data Length (n)</td>
- <td>Data</td>
- </tr>
-</table>
-</p>
-<p>
-<A NAME="prefix-codes"></A> For most packets, the first byte of the
-payload encodes the type of message. The exception is for request body
-packets sent from the server to the container -- they are sent with a
-standard packet header (0x1234 and then length of the packet), but without
-any prefix code after that (this seems like a mistake to me).
-</p><p>
-The web server can send the following messages to the servlet container:
-
-<table>
- <tr>
- <th>Code</th>
- <th>Type of Packet</th>
- <th>Meaning</th>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td>2</td>
- <td>Forward Request</td>
- <td>Begin the request-processing cycle with the following data</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td>7</td>
- <td>Shutdown</td>
- <td>The web server asks the container to shut itself down.</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td>8</td>
- <td>Ping</td>
- <td>The web server asks the container to take control (secure login phase).</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td>10</td>
- <td>CPing</td>
- <td>The web server asks the container to respond quickly with a CPong.</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td>none</td>
- <td>Data</td>
- <td>Size (2 bytes) and corresponding body data.</td>
- </tr>
-</table>
-</p>
-<p>
-To ensure some
-basic security, the container will only actually do the <code>Shutdown</code> if the
-request comes from the same machine on which it's hosted.
-</p>
-<p>
-The first <code>Data</code> packet is send immediatly after the <code>Forward Request</code> by the web server.
-</p>
-
-<p>The servlet container can send the following types of messages to the web
-server:
-<table>
- <tr>
- <th>Code</th>
- <th>Type of Packet</th>
- <th>Meaning</th>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td>3</td>
- <td>Send Body Chunk</td>
- <td>Send a chunk of the body from the servlet container to the web
- server (and presumably, onto the browser). </td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td>4</td>
- <td>Send Headers</td>
- <td>Send the response headers from the servlet container to the web
- server (and presumably, onto the browser).</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td>5</td>
- <td>End Response</td>
- <td>Marks the end of the response (and thus the request-handling cycle).</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td>6</td>
- <td>Get Body Chunk</td>
- <td>Get further data from the request if it hasn't all been transferred
- yet.</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td>9</td>
- <td>CPong Reply</td>
- <td>The reply to a CPing request</td>
- </tr>
-</table>
-</p>
-<p>
-Each of the above messages has a different internal structure, detailed below.
-</p>
-</subsection>
-</section>
-
-<section name="Request Packet Structure">
-
-<p>
-For messages from the server to the container of type "Forward Request":
-</p><p>
-<source>
-AJP13_FORWARD_REQUEST :=
- prefix_code (byte) 0x02 = JK_AJP13_FORWARD_REQUEST
- method (byte)
- protocol (string)
- req_uri (string)
- remote_addr (string)
- remote_host (string)
- server_name (string)
- server_port (integer)
- is_ssl (boolean)
- num_headers (integer)
- request_headers *(req_header_name req_header_value)
- attributes *(attribut_name attribute_value)
- request_terminator (byte) OxFF
-</source>
-</p><p>
-The <code>request_headers</code> have the following structure:
-</p><p>
-<source>
-req_header_name :=
- sc_req_header_name | (string) [see below for how this is parsed]
-
-sc_req_header_name := 0xA0xx (integer)
-
-req_header_value := (string)
-</source>
-</p><p>
-
-The <code>attributes</code> are optional and have the following structure:
-</p><p>
-<source>
-attribute_name := sc_a_name | (sc_a_req_attribute string)
-
-attribute_value := (string)
-
-</source>
-</p><p>
-Not that the all-important header is "content-length', because it
-determines whether or not the container looks for another packet
-immediately.
-</p><p>
-Detailed description of the elements of Forward Request.
-</p>
-<subsection name="request_prefix">
-<p>
-For all requests, this will be 2.
-See above for details on other <A HREF="#prefix-codes">prefix codes</A>.
-</p>
-</subsection>
-
-<subsection name="method">
-<p>
-The HTTP method, encoded as a single byte:
-</p>
-
-<p>
-<table>
- <tr><th>Command Name</th><th>Code</th></tr>
- <tr><td>OPTIONS</td><td>1</td></tr>
- <tr><td>GET</td><td>2</td></tr>
- <tr><td>HEAD</td><td>3</td></tr>
- <tr><td>POST</td><td>4</td></tr>
- <tr><td>PUT</td><td>5</td></tr>
- <tr><td>DELETE</td><td>6</td></tr>
- <tr><td>TRACE</td><td>7</td></tr>
- <tr><td>PROPFIND</td><td>8</td></tr>
- <tr><td>PROPPATCH</td><td>9</td></tr>
- <tr><td>MKCOL</td><td>10</td></tr>
- <tr><td>COPY</td><td>11</td></tr>
- <tr><td>MOVE</td><td>12</td></tr>
- <tr><td>LOCK</td><td>13</td></tr>
- <tr><td>UNLOCK</td><td>14</td></tr>
- <tr><td>ACL</td><td>15</td></tr>
- <tr><td>REPORT</td><td>16</td></tr>
- <tr><td>VERSION-CONTROL</td><td>17</td></tr>
- <tr><td>CHECKIN</td><td>18</td></tr>
- <tr><td>CHECKOUT</td><td>19</td></tr>
- <tr><td>UNCHECKOUT</td><td>20</td></tr>
- <tr><td>SEARCH</td><td>21</td></tr>
- <tr><td>MKWORKSPACE</td><td>22</td></tr>
- <tr><td>UPDATE</td><td>23</td></tr>
- <tr><td>LABEL</td><td>24</td></tr>
- <tr><td>MERGE</td><td>25</td></tr>
- <tr><td>BASELINE_CONTROL</td><td>26</td></tr>
- <tr><td>MKACTIVITY</td><td>27</td></tr>
-</table>
-</p>
-
-<p>Later version of ajp13, when used with mod_jk2, will transport
-additional methods, even if they are not in this list.
-</p>
-
-</subsection>
-
-<subsection name="protocol, req_uri, remote_addr, remote_host, server_name, server_port, is_ssl">
-<p>
- These are all fairly self-explanatory. Each of these is required, and
- will be sent for every request.
-</p>
-</subsection>
-
-<subsection name="Headers">
-<p>
- The structure of <code>request_headers</code> is the following:
- First, the number of headers <code>num_headers</code> is encoded.
- Then, a series of header name <code>req_header_name</code> / value
- <code>req_header_value</code> pairs follows.
- Common header names are encoded as integers,
- to save space. If the header name is not in the list of basic headers,
- it is encoded normally (as a string, with prefixed length). The list of
- common headers <code>sc_req_header_name</code>and their codes
- is as follows (all are case-sensitive):
-</p><p>
-<table>
- <tr><th>Name</th><th>Code value</th><th>Code name</th></tr>
- <tr><td>accept</td><td>0xA001</td><td>SC_REQ_ACCEPT</td></tr>
- <tr><td>accept-charset</td><td>0xA002</td><td>SC_REQ_ACCEPT_CHARSET</td></tr>
- <tr><td>accept-encoding</td><td>0xA003</td><td>SC_REQ_ACCEPT_ENCODING</td></tr>
- <tr><td>accept-language</td><td>0xA004</td><td>SC_REQ_ACCEPT_LANGUAGE</td></tr>
- <tr><td>authorization</td><td>0xA005</td><td>SC_REQ_AUTHORIZATION</td></tr>
- <tr><td>connection</td><td>0xA006</td><td>SC_REQ_CONNECTION</td></tr>
- <tr><td>content-type</td><td>0xA007</td><td>SC_REQ_CONTENT_TYPE</td></tr>
- <tr><td>content-length</td><td>0xA008</td><td>SC_REQ_CONTENT_LENGTH</td></tr>
- <tr><td>cookie</td><td>0xA009</td><td>SC_REQ_COOKIE</td></tr>
- <tr><td>cookie2</td><td>0xA00A</td><td>SC_REQ_COOKIE2</td></tr>
- <tr><td>host</td><td>0xA00B</td><td>SC_REQ_HOST</td></tr>
- <tr><td>pragma</td><td>0xA00C</td><td>SC_REQ_PRAGMA</td></tr>
- <tr><td>referer</td><td>0xA00D</td><td>SC_REQ_REFERER</td></tr>
- <tr><td>user-agent</td><td>0xA00E</td><td>SC_REQ_USER_AGENT</td></tr>
-</table>
-</p><p>
- The Java code that reads this grabs the first two-byte integer and if
- it sees an <code>'0xA0'</code> in the most significant
- byte, it uses the integer in the second byte as an index into an array of
- header names. If the first byte is not '0xA0', it assumes that the
- two-byte integer is the length of a string, which is then read in.
-</p><p>
- This works on the assumption that no header names will have length
- greater than 0x9999 (==0xA000 - 1), which is perfectly reasonable, though
- somewhat arbitrary. (If you, like me, started to think about the cookie
- spec here, and about how long headers can get, fear not -- this limit is
- on header <b>names</b> not header <b>values</b>. It seems unlikely that
- unmanageably huge header names will be showing up in the HTTP spec any time
- soon).
-</p><p>
- <b>Note:</b> The <code>content-length</code> header is extremely
- important. If it is present and non-zero, the container assumes that
- the request has a body (a POST request, for example), and immediately
- reads a separate packet off the input stream to get that body.
-</p>
-</subsection>
-
-<subsection name="Attributes">
-<p>
-
- The attributes prefixed with a <code>?</code>
- (e.g. <code>?context</code>) are all optional. For each, there is a
- single byte code to indicate the type of attribute, and then a string to
- give its value. They can be sent in any order (thogh the C code always
- sends them in the order listed below). A special terminating code is
- sent to signal the end of the list of optional attributes. The list of
- byte codes is:
-</p><p>
-
-<table>
- <tr><th>Information</th><th>Code Value</th><th>Note</th></tr>
- <tr><td>?context</td><td>0x01</td><td>Not currently implemented</td></tr>
- <tr><td>?servlet_path</td><td>0x02</td><td>Not currently implemented</td></tr>
- <tr><td>?remote_user</td><td>0x03</td><td></td></tr>
- <tr><td>?auth_type</td><td>0x04</td><td></td></tr>
- <tr><td>?query_string</td><td>0x05</td><td></td></tr>
- <tr><td>?route</td><td>0x06</td><td></td></tr>
- <tr><td>?ssl_cert</td><td>0x07</td><td></td></tr>
- <tr><td>?ssl_cipher</td><td>0x08</td><td></td></tr>
- <tr><td>?ssl_session</td><td>0x09</td><td></td></tr>
- <tr><td>?req_attribute</td><td>0x0A</td><td>Name (the name of the attribut follows)</td></tr>
- <tr><td>?ssl_key_size</td><td>0x0B</td><td></td></tr>
- <tr><td>?secret</td><td>0x0C</td><td></td></tr>
- <tr><td>?stored_method</td><td>0x0D</td><td></td></tr>
- <tr><td>are_done</td><td>0xFF</td><td>request_terminator</td></tr>
-</table>
-
-</p><p>
-
- The <code>context</code> and <code>servlet_path</code> are not currently
- set by the C code, and most of the Java code completely ignores whatever
- is sent over for those fields (and some of it will actually break if a
- string is sent along after one of those codes). I don't know if this is
- a bug or an unimplemented feature or just vestigial code, but it's
- missing from both sides of the connection.
-</p><p>
- The <code>remote_user</code> and <code>auth_type</code> presumably refer
- to HTTP-level authentication, and communicate the remote user's username
- and the type of authentication used to establish their identity (e.g. Basic,
- Digest). I'm not clear on why the password isn't also sent, but I don't
- know HTTP authentication inside and out.
-</p><p>
- The <code>query_string</code>, <code>ssl_cert</code>,
- <code>ssl_cipher</code>, and <code>ssl_session</code> refer to the
- corresponding pieces of HTTP and HTTPS.
-</p><p>
- The <code>route</code>, as I understand it, is used to support sticky
- sessions -- associating a user's sesson with a particular Tomcat instance
- in the presence of multiple, load-balancing servers. I don't know the
- details.
-</p><p>
- Beyond this list of basic attributes, any number of other attributes can
- be sent via the <code>req_attribute</code> code (0x0A). A pair of strings
- to represent the attribute name and value are sent immediately after each
- instance of that code. Environment values are passed in via this method.
-</p><p>
- Finally, after all the attributes have been sent, the attribute terminator,
- 0xFF, is sent. This signals both the end of the list of attributes and
- also then end of the Request Packet.
-</p>
-</subsection>
-
-</section>
-
-<section name="Response Packet Structure">
-
-<p>
-For messages which the container can send back to the server.
-
-<source>
-AJP13_SEND_BODY_CHUNK :=
- prefix_code 3
- chunk_length (integer)
- chunk *(byte)
-
-
-AJP13_SEND_HEADERS :=
- prefix_code 4
- http_status_code (integer)
- http_status_msg (string)
- num_headers (integer)
- response_headers *(res_header_name header_value)
-
-res_header_name :=
- sc_res_header_name | (string) [see below for how this is parsed]
-
-sc_res_header_name := 0xA0 (byte)
-
-header_value := (string)
-
-AJP13_END_RESPONSE :=
- prefix_code 5
- reuse (boolean)
-
-
-AJP13_GET_BODY_CHUNK :=
- prefix_code 6
- requested_length (integer)
-</source>
-
-</p>
-<p>
-Details:
-</p>
-
-<subsection name="Send Body Chunk">
-<p>
- The chunk is basically binary data, and is sent directly back to the browser.
-</p>
-</subsection>
-
-<subsection name="Send Headers">
-<p>
- The status code and message are the usual HTTP things (e.g. "200" and "OK").
- The response header names are encoded the same way the request header names are.
- See <A HREF="#header_encoding">above</A> for details about how the the
- codes are distinguished from the strings. The codes for common headers are:
-</p>
-
-<p>
-<table>
- <tr><th>Name</th><th>Code value</th></tr>
- <tr><td>Content-Type</td><td>0xA001</td></tr>
- <tr><td>Content-Language</td><td>0xA002</td></tr>
- <tr><td>Content-Length</td><td>0xA003</td></tr>
- <tr><td>Date</td><td>0xA004</td></tr>
- <tr><td>Last-Modified</td><td>0xA005</td></tr>
- <tr><td>Location</td><td>0xA006</td></tr>
- <tr><td>Set-Cookie</td><td>0xA007</td></tr>
- <tr><td>Set-Cookie2</td><td>0xA008</td></tr>
- <tr><td>Servlet-Engine</td><td>0xA009</td></tr>
- <tr><td>Status</td><td>0xA00A</td></tr>
- <tr><td>WWW-Authenticate</td><td>0xA00B</td></tr>
-</table>
-
-</p>
-
-<p>
- After the code or the string header name, the header value is immediately
- encoded.
-</p>
-
-</subsection>
-
-<subsection name="End Response">
-<p>
- Signals the end of this request-handling cycle. If the
- <code>reuse</code> flag is true (==1), this TCP connection can now be used to
- handle new incoming requests. If <code>reuse</code> is false (anything
- other than 1 in the actual C code), the connection should be closed.
-</p>
-</subsection>
-
-<subsection name="Get Body Chunk">
-<p>
- The container asks for more data from the request (If the body was
- too large to fit in the first packet sent over or when the request is
- chuncked).
- The server will send a body packet back with an amount of data which is
- the minimum of the <code>request_length</code>,
- the maximum send body size (8186 (8 Kbytes - 6)), and the
- number of bytes actually left to send from the request body.
-<br/>
- If there is no more data in the body (i.e. the servlet container is
- trying to read past the end of the body), the server will send back an
- "empty" packet, which is a body packet with a payload length of 0.
- (0x12,0x34,0x00,0x00)
-</p>
-</subsection>
-</section>
-
-<section name="Questions I Have">
-
-<p> What happens if the request headers > max packet size? There is no
-provision to send a second packet of request headers in case there are more
-than 8K (I think this is correctly handled for response headers, though I'm
-not certain). I don't know if there is a way to get more than 8K worth of
-data into that initial set of request headers, but I'll bet there is
-(combine long cookies with long ssl information and a lot of environment
-variables, and you should hit 8K easily). I think the connector would just
-fail before trying to send any headers in this case, but I'm not certain.</p>
-
-<p> What about authentication? There doesn't seem to be any authentication
-of the connection between the web server and the container. This strikes
-me as potentially dangerous.</p>
-
-</section>
-
-</body>
-</document>