aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/overcloud-without-mergepy.yaml
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2014-12-05Set default network interfaces to nic1Dan Prince1-2/+2
Now that we are using os-net-config we can make use of the nic naming abstraction layer where the actual physical nic name is mapped automatically. This change removes all the eth0 references and replaces them with nic1 which should make it more likely that these default values would actually work on some distributions. It also removes the single instance of eth2 in the undercloud-bm-nova-deploy.yaml template and replaces it with nic1 as well. Underclouds aren't a special case in this regard (I run my bare metal undercloud on em1) so there is no good reason to default to the second nic. Change-Id: I3ea92a502bc4b8789f74913f232ac8bc6b843008
2014-12-05Merge "Remove LiveUpdate params"Jenkins1-26/+0
2014-12-05Align the cinder-storage.yaml template with block-storage.yamlGiulio Fidente1-1/+1
Change-Id: I00af10e07feed6c9c97ee6cad545dbff88cd6afc
2014-12-01Remove LiveUpdate paramsDan Prince1-26/+0
The params were added in I2997d23c584055c40034827e9beb58e6542ea11c as a means to pass undercloud image data to overcloud instances so they could perform an update via takeovernode). We've never actually made use of them via takeovernode... furthermore these params are a bit stale in that they haven't been applied to other instance types (storage, etc.). I propose we remove them entirely and start with a fresh plan for how these would get used (perhaps a blueprint). As is these don't appear to have ever been fully wired up to do anything removing them should have no effect on end users. Change-Id: I96f91fb0d67e7fe203d3767c8ab89ce82adbe331
2014-10-31Merge "Use parameter constraints for image, key and flavor"Jenkins1-0/+10
2014-10-31Merge "Add converted version of block and object storage"Jenkins1-17/+84
2014-10-28Don't replace OS::Neutron::Port on updateSteve Hardy1-0/+2
Due to an ununsual interface to OS::Neutron::Port resources, it's necessary to specify replacement_policy: AUTO, or the resource is unconditionally replaced on every stack update. I've started discussion re possibly changing the default in Heat, but right now, we need this or we have the bad outcome of replacing all (!) compute and controller nodes on every stack-update, even if the templates are unmodified. Passing the AUTO value should be safe regardless of any potential change of default value in Heat. Change-Id: I6dd02ae17407f8f4c81ae418e5027f4f38ae4e9b Closes-Bug: #1383709
2014-10-23Use parameter constraints for image, key and flavorSteven Hardy1-0/+10
If you don't have (or provide) the wrong image, KeyName, or flavor, we fail at some later point (not always early, depending on what's wrong). Since Icehouse, Heat has had a "custom constraints" method of dynamically validating parameter values, by comparing the value provided with a list from the underlying service. Despite the name, there's nothing "custom" about the constraints, these ones are included in Heat by default (though they are pluggable, which is where the name comes from..) See the docs for more info: http://docs.openstack.org/developer/heat/template_guide/hot_spec.html#custom-constraint Note, I've not considered network validation here, this could possibly be added in a subsequent patch. These constraints are evaluated via any of the following: - heat template-validate -f <template> - heat stack-preview <arguments given to create> - heat stack-create <arguments, fails fast before creating anything> - heat stack-update <arguments, fails fast before updating anything> Change-Id: I3a6374ce5421575cdde893c62aa97c750a07acd8
2014-10-21Add converted version of block and object storagePeter Belanyi1-17/+84
This patch extends the previous 'Don't use merge.py for overcloud' commit with the cinder-storage.yaml and swift-storage.yaml templates. Requirements for this to deploy: 1. Block and object storage images have to be built (overcloud-cinder-volume and overcloud-swift-storage) 2. The images have to be loaded by devtest_overcloud.sh OVERCLOUD_CINDER_ID=$(load-image -d $TRIPLEO_ROOT/overcloud-cinder-volume.qcow2) OVERCLOUD_SWIFT_ID=$(load-image -d $TRIPLEO_ROOT/overcloud-swift-storage.qcow2) Change-Id: I45f9d9f051970a83e26c0fd924d7c98276958113
2014-10-20Compute and controller templates without merge.pyTomas Sedovic1-0/+677
This provides three templates: overcloud-without-mergepy.yaml, compute.yaml and controller.yaml. These can be used in combination with overcloud-resource-registry.yaml to deploy the overcloud on their own -- without having to do any pre-processing (via merge.py). To test these you have to add the resource registry environment (in addition to the existing `-e` option) and use the new overcloud template in the Heat call in devtest_overcloud.sh (line 374): heat $HEAT_OP -e $TRIPLEO_ROOT/overcloud-env.json \ -e "$TRIPLEO_ROOT/tripleo-heat-templates/overcloud-resource-registry.yaml" \ -t 360 \ -f $TRIPLEO_ROOT/tripleo-heat-templates/overcloud-without-mergepy.yaml \ -P "ExtraConfig=${OVERCLOUD_EXTRA_CONFIG}" \ $STACKNAME The existing overcloud Heat environment ($TRIPLE_ROOT/overcloud-env.json) should keep on working. Scaling is now being controlled by the `ControllerCount` and `ComputeCount` template parameters, though. NOTE: the changes here depend on a fairly recent Heat build (commit e5f285f6cb from ~7th September, 2014). In other words, this requires Juno Heat. Also, passing more than one environment file to Heat requires python-heatclient version 0.2.11. Change-Id: I687a00c7dc164ba044f9f2dfca96a02401427855