summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/overcloud-resource-registry.yaml
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2014-12-19Compute: drive NW configuration via software confDan Prince1-0/+1
This example extends the compute software configuration so that heat metadata is used to model the os-net-config YAML (ultimately JSON) directly. The existing os-net-config element already supports this format. Configuring the physical network layer in this manner would supplant the ever growing list of Heat parameters that we have and is something that could be automatically generated via tuskar. The default is to use net-config-noop.yaml which will pass no config metadata into the os-net-config element which will essentially disable it in favor of using parameters w/ init-neutron-ovs. Change-Id: I30f325b1751caaef5624537e63ee27c2e418d5c8
2014-11-14Split out Nova software configDan Prince1-0/+2
This is a step towards supporting pluggable software configurations in the heat templates. By moving compute-config out of compute.yaml we make it possible to define alternate implementations by changing the OS::TripleO::Compute::SoftwareConfig value in the overcloud-resource-registry.yaml heat environment file. Co-Authored-By: Steve Hardy <shardy@redhat.com> Change-Id: I250dc1a8c02626cf7d1a5d2ce92706504ec0c7de
2014-10-21Add converted version of block and object storagePeter Belanyi1-0/+2
This patch extends the previous 'Don't use merge.py for overcloud' commit with the cinder-storage.yaml and swift-storage.yaml templates. Requirements for this to deploy: 1. Block and object storage images have to be built (overcloud-cinder-volume and overcloud-swift-storage) 2. The images have to be loaded by devtest_overcloud.sh OVERCLOUD_CINDER_ID=$(load-image -d $TRIPLEO_ROOT/overcloud-cinder-volume.qcow2) OVERCLOUD_SWIFT_ID=$(load-image -d $TRIPLEO_ROOT/overcloud-swift-storage.qcow2) Change-Id: I45f9d9f051970a83e26c0fd924d7c98276958113
2014-10-20Compute and controller templates without merge.pyTomas Sedovic1-0/+3
This provides three templates: overcloud-without-mergepy.yaml, compute.yaml and controller.yaml. These can be used in combination with overcloud-resource-registry.yaml to deploy the overcloud on their own -- without having to do any pre-processing (via merge.py). To test these you have to add the resource registry environment (in addition to the existing `-e` option) and use the new overcloud template in the Heat call in devtest_overcloud.sh (line 374): heat $HEAT_OP -e $TRIPLEO_ROOT/overcloud-env.json \ -e "$TRIPLEO_ROOT/tripleo-heat-templates/overcloud-resource-registry.yaml" \ -t 360 \ -f $TRIPLEO_ROOT/tripleo-heat-templates/overcloud-without-mergepy.yaml \ -P "ExtraConfig=${OVERCLOUD_EXTRA_CONFIG}" \ $STACKNAME The existing overcloud Heat environment ($TRIPLE_ROOT/overcloud-env.json) should keep on working. Scaling is now being controlled by the `ControllerCount` and `ComputeCount` template parameters, though. NOTE: the changes here depend on a fairly recent Heat build (commit e5f285f6cb from ~7th September, 2014). In other words, this requires Juno Heat. Also, passing more than one environment file to Heat requires python-heatclient version 0.2.11. Change-Id: I687a00c7dc164ba044f9f2dfca96a02401427855