| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
The params were added in I2997d23c584055c40034827e9beb58e6542ea11c
as a means to pass undercloud image data to overcloud instances
so they could perform an update via takeovernode). We've
never actually made use of them via takeovernode... furthermore
these params are a bit stale in that they haven't been applied
to other instance types (storage, etc.).
I propose we remove them entirely and start with a fresh plan for
how these would get used (perhaps a blueprint). As is these don't
appear to have ever been fully wired up to do anything removing
them should have no effect on end users.
Change-Id: I96f91fb0d67e7fe203d3767c8ab89ce82adbe331
|
|
This is a step towards supporting pluggable software configurations
in the heat templates. By moving compute-config out of compute.yaml
we make it possible to define alternate implementations by
changing the OS::TripleO::Compute::SoftwareConfig value in the
overcloud-resource-registry.yaml heat environment file.
Co-Authored-By: Steve Hardy <shardy@redhat.com>
Change-Id: I250dc1a8c02626cf7d1a5d2ce92706504ec0c7de
|
|
|
|
If you don't have (or provide) the wrong image, KeyName,
or flavor, we fail at some later point (not always early,
depending on what's wrong).
Since Icehouse, Heat has had a "custom constraints" method
of dynamically validating parameter values, by comparing the
value provided with a list from the underlying service.
Despite the name, there's nothing "custom" about the constraints,
these ones are included in Heat by default (though they are pluggable,
which is where the name comes from..)
See the docs for more info:
http://docs.openstack.org/developer/heat/template_guide/hot_spec.html#custom-constraint
Note, I've not considered network validation here, this could
possibly be added in a subsequent patch.
These constraints are evaluated via any of the following:
- heat template-validate -f <template>
- heat stack-preview <arguments given to create>
- heat stack-create <arguments, fails fast before creating anything>
- heat stack-update <arguments, fails fast before updating anything>
Change-Id: I3a6374ce5421575cdde893c62aa97c750a07acd8
|
|
This patch extends the previous 'Don't use merge.py for overcloud'
commit with the cinder-storage.yaml and swift-storage.yaml templates.
Requirements for this to deploy:
1. Block and object storage images have to be built
(overcloud-cinder-volume and overcloud-swift-storage)
2. The images have to be loaded by devtest_overcloud.sh
OVERCLOUD_CINDER_ID=$(load-image -d $TRIPLEO_ROOT/overcloud-cinder-volume.qcow2)
OVERCLOUD_SWIFT_ID=$(load-image -d $TRIPLEO_ROOT/overcloud-swift-storage.qcow2)
Change-Id: I45f9d9f051970a83e26c0fd924d7c98276958113
|
|
This provides three templates: overcloud-without-mergepy.yaml,
compute.yaml and controller.yaml. These can be used in combination with
overcloud-resource-registry.yaml to deploy the overcloud on their own --
without having to do any pre-processing (via merge.py).
To test these you have to add the resource registry environment (in
addition to the existing `-e` option) and use the new overcloud template
in the Heat call in devtest_overcloud.sh (line 374):
heat $HEAT_OP -e $TRIPLEO_ROOT/overcloud-env.json \
-e "$TRIPLEO_ROOT/tripleo-heat-templates/overcloud-resource-registry.yaml" \
-t 360 \
-f $TRIPLEO_ROOT/tripleo-heat-templates/overcloud-without-mergepy.yaml \
-P "ExtraConfig=${OVERCLOUD_EXTRA_CONFIG}" \
$STACKNAME
The existing overcloud Heat environment
($TRIPLE_ROOT/overcloud-env.json) should keep on working. Scaling is
now being controlled by the `ControllerCount` and `ComputeCount`
template parameters, though.
NOTE: the changes here depend on a fairly recent Heat build (commit
e5f285f6cb from ~7th September, 2014). In other words, this requires
Juno Heat.
Also, passing more than one environment file to Heat requires
python-heatclient version 0.2.11.
Change-Id: I687a00c7dc164ba044f9f2dfca96a02401427855
|
Dan Prince
Jenkins
Steven Hardy
Peter Belanyi
Tomas Sedovic