summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/compute.yaml
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2014-10-31Merge "Use parameter constraints for image, key and flavor"Jenkins1-0/+6
2014-10-23Use parameter constraints for image, key and flavorSteven Hardy1-0/+6
If you don't have (or provide) the wrong image, KeyName, or flavor, we fail at some later point (not always early, depending on what's wrong). Since Icehouse, Heat has had a "custom constraints" method of dynamically validating parameter values, by comparing the value provided with a list from the underlying service. Despite the name, there's nothing "custom" about the constraints, these ones are included in Heat by default (though they are pluggable, which is where the name comes from..) See the docs for more info: http://docs.openstack.org/developer/heat/template_guide/hot_spec.html#custom-constraint Note, I've not considered network validation here, this could possibly be added in a subsequent patch. These constraints are evaluated via any of the following: - heat template-validate -f <template> - heat stack-preview <arguments given to create> - heat stack-create <arguments, fails fast before creating anything> - heat stack-update <arguments, fails fast before updating anything> Change-Id: I3a6374ce5421575cdde893c62aa97c750a07acd8
2014-10-21Add converted version of block and object storagePeter Belanyi1-1/+1
This patch extends the previous 'Don't use merge.py for overcloud' commit with the cinder-storage.yaml and swift-storage.yaml templates. Requirements for this to deploy: 1. Block and object storage images have to be built (overcloud-cinder-volume and overcloud-swift-storage) 2. The images have to be loaded by devtest_overcloud.sh OVERCLOUD_CINDER_ID=$(load-image -d $TRIPLEO_ROOT/overcloud-cinder-volume.qcow2) OVERCLOUD_SWIFT_ID=$(load-image -d $TRIPLEO_ROOT/overcloud-swift-storage.qcow2) Change-Id: I45f9d9f051970a83e26c0fd924d7c98276958113
2014-10-20Compute and controller templates without merge.pyTomas Sedovic1-0/+401
This provides three templates: overcloud-without-mergepy.yaml, compute.yaml and controller.yaml. These can be used in combination with overcloud-resource-registry.yaml to deploy the overcloud on their own -- without having to do any pre-processing (via merge.py). To test these you have to add the resource registry environment (in addition to the existing `-e` option) and use the new overcloud template in the Heat call in devtest_overcloud.sh (line 374): heat $HEAT_OP -e $TRIPLEO_ROOT/overcloud-env.json \ -e "$TRIPLEO_ROOT/tripleo-heat-templates/overcloud-resource-registry.yaml" \ -t 360 \ -f $TRIPLEO_ROOT/tripleo-heat-templates/overcloud-without-mergepy.yaml \ -P "ExtraConfig=${OVERCLOUD_EXTRA_CONFIG}" \ $STACKNAME The existing overcloud Heat environment ($TRIPLE_ROOT/overcloud-env.json) should keep on working. Scaling is now being controlled by the `ControllerCount` and `ComputeCount` template parameters, though. NOTE: the changes here depend on a fairly recent Heat build (commit e5f285f6cb from ~7th September, 2014). In other words, this requires Juno Heat. Also, passing more than one environment file to Heat requires python-heatclient version 0.2.11. Change-Id: I687a00c7dc164ba044f9f2dfca96a02401427855