aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/docs/testing/user/userguide/opnfv_yardstick_tc025.rst
blob: f3f9ea6bf4c09245827839309673e1ee935d03ad (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
.. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
.. License.
.. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
.. (c) OPNFV, Huawei Technologies Co.,Ltd and others.

*************************************
Yardstick Test Case Description TC025
*************************************

+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|OpenStack Controller Node abnormally shutdown High Availability              |
|                                                                             |
+--------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
|test case id  | OPNFV_YARDSTICK_TC025_HA: OpenStack Controller Node          |
|              | abnormally shutdown                                          |
|              |                                                              |
+--------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
|test purpose  | This test case will verify the high availability of          |
|              | controller node. When one of the controller node abnormally  |
|              | shutdown, the service provided by it should be OK.           |
|              |                                                              |
+--------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
|test method   | This test case shutdowns a specified controller node with    |
|              | some fault injection tools, then checks whether all services |
|              | provided by the controller node are OK with some monitor     |
|              | tools.                                                       |
|              |                                                              |
+--------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
|attackers     | In this test case, an attacker called "host-shutdown" is     |
|              | needed. This attacker includes two parameters:               |
|              | 1) fault_type: which is used for finding the attacker's      |
|              | scripts. It should be always set to "host-shutdown" in       |
|              | this test case.                                              |
|              | 2) host: the name of a controller node being attacked.       |
|              |                                                              |
|              | e.g.                                                         |
|              | -fault_type: "host-shutdown"                                 |
|              | -host: node1                                                 |
|              |                                                              |
+--------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
|monitors      | In this test case, one kind of monitor are needed:           |
|              |                                                              |
|              | 1. the "openstack-cmd" monitor constantly request a specific |
|              |    Openstack command, which needs two parameters             |
|              |                                                              |
|              |    1) monitor_type: which is used for finding the monitor    |
|              |       class and related scripts. It should be always set to  |
|              |       "openstack-cmd" for this monitor.                      |
|              |    2) command_name: which is the command name used for       |
|              |       request                                                |
|              |                                                              |
|              | There are four instance of the "openstack-cmd" monitor:      |
|              | monitor1:                                                    |
|              | -monitor_type: "openstack-cmd"                               |
|              | -api_name: "nova image-list"                                 |
|              | monitor2:                                                    |
|              | -monitor_type: "openstack-cmd"                               |
|              | -api_name: "neutron router-list"                             |
|              | monitor3:                                                    |
|              | -monitor_type: "openstack-cmd"                               |
|              | -api_name: "heat stack-list"                                 |
|              | monitor4:                                                    |
|              | -monitor_type: "openstack-cmd"                               |
|              | -api_name: "cinder list"                                     |
|              |                                                              |
+--------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
|metrics       | In this test case, there is one metric:                      |
|              | 1)service_outage_time: which indicates the maximum outage    |
|              | time (seconds) of the specified Openstack command request.   |
|              |                                                              |
+--------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
|test tool     | Developed by the project. Please see folder:                 |
|              | "yardstick/benchmark/scenarios/availability/ha_tools"        |
|              |                                                              |
+--------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
|references    | ETSI NFV REL001                                              |
|              |                                                              |
+--------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
|configuration | This test case needs two configuration files:                |
|              | 1) test case file: opnfv_yardstick_tc019.yaml                |
|              | -Attackers: see above "attackers" discription                |
|              | -waiting_time: which is the time (seconds) from the process  |
|              | being killed to stoping monitors the monitors                |
|              | -Monitors: see above "monitors" discription                  |
|              | -SLA: see above "metrics" discription                        |
|              |                                                              |
|              | 2)POD file: pod.yaml                                         |
|              | The POD configuration should record on pod.yaml first.       |
|              | the "host" item in this test case will use the node name in  |
|              | the pod.yaml.                                                |
|              |                                                              |
+--------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
|test sequence | description and expected result                              |
|              |                                                              |
+--------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
|step 1        | start monitors:                                              |
|              | each monitor will run with independently process             |
|              |                                                              |
|              | Result: The monitor info will be collected.                  |
|              |                                                              |
+--------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
|step 2        | do attacker: connect the host through SSH, and then execute  |
|              | shutdown script on the host                                  |
|              |                                                              |
|              | Result: The host will be shutdown.                           |
|              |                                                              |
+--------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
|step 3        | stop monitors after a period of time specified by            |
|              | "waiting_time"                                               |
|              |                                                              |
|              | Result: All monitor result will be aggregated.               |
|              |                                                              |
+--------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
|step 4        | verify the SLA                                               |
|              |                                                              |
|              | Result: The test case is passed or not.                      |
|              |                                                              |
+--------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
|post-action   | It is the action when the test cases exist. It restarts the  |
|              | specified controller node if it is not restarted.            |
|              |                                                              |
+--------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
|test verdict  | Fails only if SLA is not passed, or if there is a test case  |
|              | execution problem.                                           |
|              |                                                              |
+--------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+