From 0b17e1c0b799854f3dbbd35922be8577debaf03f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Maryam Tahhan Date: Thu, 14 May 2015 10:54:44 +0100 Subject: IETFSummary: Add initial IETF summary of LTD JIRA: VSPERF-43 Change-Id: I1020b2845a644d3002c08ede3a6dfa8fc068781a Signed-off-by: Maryam Tahhan Signed-off-by: Billy O'Mahony Signed-off-by: Al Morton --- .../draft-vsperf-bmwg-vswitch-opnfv-00.xml | 554 +++++++++++++++++++++ test_spec/vswitchperf_ltd.md | 66 +-- 2 files changed, 588 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-) create mode 100755 test_spec/ietf_summary/draft-vsperf-bmwg-vswitch-opnfv-00.xml diff --git a/test_spec/ietf_summary/draft-vsperf-bmwg-vswitch-opnfv-00.xml b/test_spec/ietf_summary/draft-vsperf-bmwg-vswitch-opnfv-00.xml new file mode 100755 index 00000000..e4057410 --- /dev/null +++ b/test_spec/ietf_summary/draft-vsperf-bmwg-vswitch-opnfv-00.xml @@ -0,0 +1,554 @@ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Benchmarking Virtual Switches in + OPNFV + + + Intel + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + Intel + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + AT&T Labs + +
+ + 200 Laurel Avenue South + + Middletown, + + NJ + + 07748 + + USA + + + +1 732 420 1571 + + +1 732 368 1192 + + acmorton@att.com + + http://home.comcast.net/~acmacm/ +
+ + + + + + This memo describes the progress of the Open Platform for NFV (OPNFV) + project on virtual switch performance "VSWITCHPERF". This project + intends to build on the current and completed work of the Benchmarking + Methodology Working Group in IETF, by referencing existing literature. + The Benchmarking Methodology Working Group has traditionally conducted + laboratory characterization of dedicated physical implementations of + internetworking functions. Therefore, this memo begins to describes the + additional considerations when virtual switches are implemented in + general-purpose hardware. The expanded tests and benchmarks are also + influenced by the OPNFV mission to support virtualization of the "telco" + infrastructure. + + + + The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", + "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this + document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119. + + + + + + +
+ Benchmarking Methodology Working Group (BMWG) has traditionally + conducted laboratory characterization of dedicated physical + implementations of internetworking functions. The Black-box Benchmarks + of Throughput, Latency, Forwarding Rates and others have served our + industry for many years. Now, Network Function Virtualization (NFV) has + the goal to transform how internetwork functions are implemented, and + therefore has garnered much attention. + + This memo describes the progress of the Open Platform for NFV (OPNFV) + project on virtual switch performance characterization, "VSWITCHPERF". + This project intends to build on the current and completed work of the + Benchmarking Methodology Working Group in IETF, by referencing existing + literature. For example, currently the most referenced RFC is (which depens on ) and + foundation of the benchmarking work in OPNFV is common and strong. + + See + https://wiki.opnfv.org/characterize_vswitch_performance_for_telco_nfv_use_cases + for more background, and the OPNFV website for general information: + https://www.opnfv.org/ + + The authors note that OPNFV distinguishes itself from other open + source compute and networking projects through its emphasis on existing + "telco" services as opposed to cloud-computing. There are many ways in + which telco requirements have different emhasis on performance + dimensions when compared to cloud computing: support for and transfer of + isochronous media streams is one example. + + Note also that the move to NFV Infrastructure has resulted in many + new benchmarking initiatives across the industry, and the authors are + currently doing their best to maintain alignment with many other + projects, and this Internet Draft is evidence of the efforts. +
+ +
+ The primary purpose and scope of the memo is to inform BMWG of + work-in-progress that builds on the body of extensive literature and + experience. Additionally, once the initial information conveyed here is + received, this memo may be expanded to include more detail and + commentary from both BMWG and OPNFV communities, under BMWG's chartered + work to characterize the NFV Infrastructure (a virtual switch is an + important aspect of that infrastructure). +
+ +
+ This section highlights some specific considerations (from )related to Benchmarks for virtual + switches. + +
+ To compare the performance of virtual designs and implementations + with their physical counterparts, identical benchmarks are needed. + BMWG has developed specifications for many network functions this memo + re-uses existing benchmarks through references, and expands them + during development of new methods. A key configuration aspect is the + number of parallel cores required to achieve comparable performance + with a given physical device, or whether some limit of scale was + reached before the cores could achieve the comparable level. + + It's unlikely that the virtual switch will be the only application + running on the SUT, so CPU utilization, Cache utilization, and Memory + footprint should also be recorded for the virtual implementations of + internetworking functions. +
+ +
+ External observations remain essential as the basis for Benchmarks. + Internal observations with fixed specification and interpretation will + be provided in parallel to assist the development of operations + procedures when the technology is deployed. +
+
+ +
+ The overall specification in preparation is referred to as a Level + Test Design (LTD) document, which will contain a suite of performace + tests. + + As one might expect, the most fundamental internetworking + characteristics of Throughput and Latency remain important when the + switch is virtualized, and these benchmarks figure prominently in the + specification. + + When considering characteristics important to "telco" network + functions, we must begin to consider additional performance metrics. In + this case, the project specifications have referenced metrics from the + IETF IP Performance Metrics (IPPM) literature. This means that the test of Latency is replaced by measurement of a + metric derived from IPPM's , where a set of + statistical summaries will be provided (mean, max, min, etc.). Further + metrics planned to be benchmarked include packet delay variation as + defined by , reordering, burst behaviour, DUT + availability, DUT capacity and packet loss in long term testing at + Throughput level, where some low-level of background loss may be present + and characterized. + + Tests have been (or will be) designed to collect the metrics + below: + + + Throughput Tests to measure the maximum forwarding rate (in + frames per second or fps) and bit rate (in Mbps) for a constant load + (as defined by RFC1242) without traffic loss. + + Packet and Frame Delay Distribution Tests to measure average, min + and max packet and frame delay for constant loads. + + Packet Delay Tests to understand latency distribution for + different packet sizes and over an extended test run to uncover + outliers. + + Scalability Tests to understand how the virtual switch performs + as the number of flows, active ports, complexity of the forwarding + logic’s configuration… it has to deal with + increases. + + Stream Performance Tests (TCP, UDP) to measure bulk data transfer + performance, i.e. how fast systems can send and receive data through + the switch. + + Request/Response Performance Tests (TCP, UDP) the measure the + transaction rate through the switch. + + Control Path and Datapath Coupling Tests, to understand how + closely coupled the datapath and the control path are as well as the + effect of this coupling on the performance of the DUT (example: + delay of the initial packet of a flow). + + Noisy Neighbour Tests, to understand the effects of resource + sharing on the performance of a virtual switch. + + CPU and Memory Consumption Tests to understand the virtual + switch’s footprint on the system, usually conducted as + auxilliary measurements with benchmarks above. They include: CPU + utilization, Cache utilization and Memory footprint. + + + The felixability of deployemnt of a virtual switch within a network + means that the BMWG IETF existing literature needs to be used to + characterize the performance of a switch in various deployment + scenarios. The deployment scenarios under consideration include: + +
+ Physical port to virtual switch to physical + port + + +
+ +
+ Physical port to virtual switch to VNF to virtual switch + to physical port + + +
+ Physical port to virtual switch to VNF to virtual switch + to VNF to virtual switch to physical port + + +
+ Physical port to virtual switch to VNF + + +
+ VNF to virtual switch to physical port + + +
+ VNF to virtual switch to VNF + + +
+
+ +
+ Benchmarking activities as described in this memo are limited to + technology characterization of a Device Under Test/System Under Test + (DUT/SUT) using controlled stimuli in a laboratory environment, with + dedicated address space and the constraints specified in the sections + above. + + The benchmarking network topology will be an independent test setup + and MUST NOT be connected to devices that may forward the test traffic + into a production network, or misroute traffic to the test management + network. + + Further, benchmarking is performed on a "black-box" basis, relying + solely on measurements observable external to the DUT/SUT. + + Special capabilities SHOULD NOT exist in the DUT/SUT specifically for + benchmarking purposes. Any implications for network security arising + from the DUT/SUT SHOULD be identical in the lab and in production + networks. +
+ +
+ No IANA Action is requested at this time. +
+ +
+ The authors acknowledge +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Network Function Virtualization: Performance and Portability + Best Practices + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + diff --git a/test_spec/vswitchperf_ltd.md b/test_spec/vswitchperf_ltd.md index 3090e6ad..7fbd2cc2 100644 --- a/test_spec/vswitchperf_ltd.md +++ b/test_spec/vswitchperf_ltd.md @@ -166,38 +166,40 @@ The following represents possible deployments which can help to determine the pe - Physical port → virtual switch → VNF → virtual switch → VNF → virtual switch → physical port. 

-                                                                                                                 __
-    +---------------------------------------------------+   +---------------------------------------------------+  |
-    |   Guest 1                                         |   |   Guest 2                                         |  |
-    |   +-------------------------------------------+   |   |   +-------------------------------------------+   |  |
-    |   |                 Application               |   |   |   |                 Application               |   |  |
-    |   +-------------------------------------------+   |   |   +-------------------------------------------+   |  |
-    |       ^                                  :        |   |       ^                                  :        |  |
-    |       |                                  |        |   |       |                                  |        |  |  Guest
-    |       :                                  v        |   |       :                                  v        |  |
-    |   +---------------+           +---------------+   |   |   +---------------+           +---------------+   |  |
-    |   | logical port 0|           | logical port 1|   |   |   | logical port 0|           | logical port 1|   |  |
-    +---+---------------+-----------+---------------+---+   +---+---------------+-----------+---------------+---+__|
-            ^                                  :                    ^                                  :
-            |                                  |                    |                                  |
-            :                                  v                    :                                  v         __
-    +---+---------------+----------+---------------+------------+---------------+-----------+---------------+---+  |
-    |   |     port 0    |          |     port 1    |            |     port 2    |           |     port 3    |   |  |
-    |   +---------------+          +---------------+            +---------------+           +---------------+   |  |
-    |       ^                                  :                    ^                                  :        |  |
-    |       |                                  |                    |                                  |        |  |  Host
-    |       :                                  +--------------------+                                  v        |  |
-    |   +--------------+                                                                    +--------------+    |  |
-    |   |   phy port   |                               vswitch                              |   phy port   |    |  |
-    +---+--------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+--------------+----+__|
-               ^                                                                                    :
-               |                                                                                    |
-               :                                                                                    v
-    +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
-    |                                                                                                           |
-    |                                              traffic generator                                            |
-    |                                                                                                           |
-    +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+
+                                                   __
+ +----------------------+  +----------------------+  |
+ |   Guest 1            |  |   Guest 2            |  |
+ |   +---------------+  |  |   +---------------+  |  |
+ |   |  Application  |  |  |   |  Application  |  |  |
+ |   +---------------+  |  |   +---------------+  |  |
+ |       ^       |      |  |       ^       |      |  |
+ |       |       v      |  |       |       v      |  |  Guests
+ |   +---------------+  |  |   +---------------+  |  |
+ |   | logical ports |  |  |   | logical ports |  |  |
+ |   |   0       1   |  |  |   |   0       1   |  |  |
+ +---+---------------+--+  +---+---------------+--+__|
+         ^       :                 ^       :
+         |       |                 |       |
+         :       v                 :       v       _
+ +---+---------------+---------+---------------+--+ |
+ |   |   0       1   |         |   3       4   |  | |
+ |   | logical ports |         | logical ports |  | |
+ |   +---------------+         +---------------+  | |
+ |       ^       |                 ^       |      | |  Host
+ |       |       L-----------------+       v      | |
+ |   +--------------+          +--------------+   | |
+ |   |   phy ports  | vSwitch  |   phy ports  |   | |
+ +---+--------------+----------+--------------+---+_|
+         ^       :                 ^       :
+         |       |                 |       |
+         :       v                 :       v
+ +--------------------------------------------------+
+ |                                                  |
+ |                traffic generator                 |
+ |                                                  |
+ +--------------------------------------------------+
+
- Physical port → virtual switch → VNF. -- cgit 1.2.3-korg