diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'src/ceph/doc/rados/operations/crush-map.rst')
| -rw-r--r-- | src/ceph/doc/rados/operations/crush-map.rst | 956 |
1 files changed, 956 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/src/ceph/doc/rados/operations/crush-map.rst b/src/ceph/doc/rados/operations/crush-map.rst new file mode 100644 index 0000000..05fa4ff --- /dev/null +++ b/src/ceph/doc/rados/operations/crush-map.rst @@ -0,0 +1,956 @@ +============ + CRUSH Maps +============ + +The :abbr:`CRUSH (Controlled Replication Under Scalable Hashing)` algorithm +determines how to store and retrieve data by computing data storage locations. +CRUSH empowers Ceph clients to communicate with OSDs directly rather than +through a centralized server or broker. With an algorithmically determined +method of storing and retrieving data, Ceph avoids a single point of failure, a +performance bottleneck, and a physical limit to its scalability. + +CRUSH requires a map of your cluster, and uses the CRUSH map to pseudo-randomly +store and retrieve data in OSDs with a uniform distribution of data across the +cluster. For a detailed discussion of CRUSH, see +`CRUSH - Controlled, Scalable, Decentralized Placement of Replicated Data`_ + +CRUSH maps contain a list of :abbr:`OSDs (Object Storage Devices)`, a list of +'buckets' for aggregating the devices into physical locations, and a list of +rules that tell CRUSH how it should replicate data in a Ceph cluster's pools. By +reflecting the underlying physical organization of the installation, CRUSH can +model—and thereby address—potential sources of correlated device failures. +Typical sources include physical proximity, a shared power source, and a shared +network. By encoding this information into the cluster map, CRUSH placement +policies can separate object replicas across different failure domains while +still maintaining the desired distribution. For example, to address the +possibility of concurrent failures, it may be desirable to ensure that data +replicas are on devices using different shelves, racks, power supplies, +controllers, and/or physical locations. + +When you deploy OSDs they are automatically placed within the CRUSH map under a +``host`` node named with the hostname for the host they are running on. This, +combined with the default CRUSH failure domain, ensures that replicas or erasure +code shards are separated across hosts and a single host failure will not +affect availability. For larger clusters, however, administrators should carefully consider their choice of failure domain. Separating replicas across racks, +for example, is common for mid- to large-sized clusters. + + +CRUSH Location +============== + +The location of an OSD in terms of the CRUSH map's hierarchy is +referred to as a ``crush location``. This location specifier takes the +form of a list of key and value pairs describing a position. For +example, if an OSD is in a particular row, rack, chassis and host, and +is part of the 'default' CRUSH tree (this is the case for the vast +majority of clusters), its crush location could be described as:: + + root=default row=a rack=a2 chassis=a2a host=a2a1 + +Note: + +#. Note that the order of the keys does not matter. +#. The key name (left of ``=``) must be a valid CRUSH ``type``. By default + these include root, datacenter, room, row, pod, pdu, rack, chassis and host, + but those types can be customized to be anything appropriate by modifying + the CRUSH map. +#. Not all keys need to be specified. For example, by default, Ceph + automatically sets a ``ceph-osd`` daemon's location to be + ``root=default host=HOSTNAME`` (based on the output from ``hostname -s``). + +The crush location for an OSD is normally expressed via the ``crush location`` +config option being set in the ``ceph.conf`` file. Each time the OSD starts, +it verifies it is in the correct location in the CRUSH map and, if it is not, +it moved itself. To disable this automatic CRUSH map management, add the +following to your configuration file in the ``[osd]`` section:: + + osd crush update on start = false + + +Custom location hooks +--------------------- + +A customized location hook can be used to generate a more complete +crush location on startup. The sample ``ceph-crush-location`` utility +will generate a CRUSH location string for a given daemon. The +location is based on, in order of preference: + +#. A ``crush location`` option in ceph.conf. +#. A default of ``root=default host=HOSTNAME`` where the hostname is + generated with the ``hostname -s`` command. + +This is not useful by itself, as the OSD itself has the exact same +behavior. However, the script can be modified to provide additional +location fields (for example, the rack or datacenter), and then the +hook enabled via the config option:: + + crush location hook = /path/to/customized-ceph-crush-location + +This hook is passed several arguments (below) and should output a single line +to stdout with the CRUSH location description.:: + + $ ceph-crush-location --cluster CLUSTER --id ID --type TYPE + +where the cluster name is typically 'ceph', the id is the daemon +identifier (the OSD number), and the daemon type is typically ``osd``. + + +CRUSH structure +=============== + +The CRUSH map consists of, loosely speaking, a hierarchy describing +the physical topology of the cluster, and a set of rules defining +policy about how we place data on those devices. The hierarchy has +devices (``ceph-osd`` daemons) at the leaves, and internal nodes +corresponding to other physical features or groupings: hosts, racks, +rows, datacenters, and so on. The rules describe how replicas are +placed in terms of that hierarchy (e.g., 'three replicas in different +racks'). + +Devices +------- + +Devices are individual ``ceph-osd`` daemons that can store data. You +will normally have one defined here for each OSD daemon in your +cluster. Devices are identified by an id (a non-negative integer) and +a name, normally ``osd.N`` where ``N`` is the device id. + +Devices may also have a *device class* associated with them (e.g., +``hdd`` or ``ssd``), allowing them to be conveniently targetted by a +crush rule. + +Types and Buckets +----------------- + +A bucket is the CRUSH term for internal nodes in the hierarchy: hosts, +racks, rows, etc. The CRUSH map defines a series of *types* that are +used to describe these nodes. By default, these types include: + +- osd (or device) +- host +- chassis +- rack +- row +- pdu +- pod +- room +- datacenter +- region +- root + +Most clusters make use of only a handful of these types, and others +can be defined as needed. + +The hierarchy is built with devices (normally type ``osd``) at the +leaves, interior nodes with non-device types, and a root node of type +``root``. For example, + +.. ditaa:: + + +-----------------+ + | {o}root default | + +--------+--------+ + | + +---------------+---------------+ + | | + +-------+-------+ +-----+-------+ + | {o}host foo | | {o}host bar | + +-------+-------+ +-----+-------+ + | | + +-------+-------+ +-------+-------+ + | | | | + +-----+-----+ +-----+-----+ +-----+-----+ +-----+-----+ + | osd.0 | | osd.1 | | osd.2 | | osd.3 | + +-----------+ +-----------+ +-----------+ +-----------+ + +Each node (device or bucket) in the hierarchy has a *weight* +associated with it, indicating the relative proportion of the total +data that device or hierarchy subtree should store. Weights are set +at the leaves, indicating the size of the device, and automatically +sum up the tree from there, such that the weight of the default node +will be the total of all devices contained beneath it. Normally +weights are in units of terabytes (TB). + +You can get a simple view the CRUSH hierarchy for your cluster, +including the weights, with:: + + ceph osd crush tree + +Rules +----- + +Rules define policy about how data is distributed across the devices +in the hierarchy. + +CRUSH rules define placement and replication strategies or +distribution policies that allow you to specify exactly how CRUSH +places object replicas. For example, you might create a rule selecting +a pair of targets for 2-way mirroring, another rule for selecting +three targets in two different data centers for 3-way mirroring, and +yet another rule for erasure coding over six storage devices. For a +detailed discussion of CRUSH rules, refer to `CRUSH - Controlled, +Scalable, Decentralized Placement of Replicated Data`_, and more +specifically to **Section 3.2**. + +In almost all cases, CRUSH rules can be created via the CLI by +specifying the *pool type* they will be used for (replicated or +erasure coded), the *failure domain*, and optionally a *device class*. +In rare cases rules must be written by hand by manually editing the +CRUSH map. + +You can see what rules are defined for your cluster with:: + + ceph osd crush rule ls + +You can view the contents of the rules with:: + + ceph osd crush rule dump + +Device classes +-------------- + +Each device can optionally have a *class* associated with it. By +default, OSDs automatically set their class on startup to either +`hdd`, `ssd`, or `nvme` based on the type of device they are backed +by. + +The device class for one or more OSDs can be explicitly set with:: + + ceph osd crush set-device-class <class> <osd-name> [...] + +Once a device class is set, it cannot be changed to another class +until the old class is unset with:: + + ceph osd crush rm-device-class <osd-name> [...] + +This allows administrators to set device classes without the class +being changed on OSD restart or by some other script. + +A placement rule that targets a specific device class can be created with:: + + ceph osd crush rule create-replicated <rule-name> <root> <failure-domain> <class> + +A pool can then be changed to use the new rule with:: + + ceph osd pool set <pool-name> crush_rule <rule-name> + +Device classes are implemented by creating a "shadow" CRUSH hierarchy +for each device class in use that contains only devices of that class. +Rules can then distribute data over the shadow hierarchy. One nice +thing about this approach is that it is fully backward compatible with +old Ceph clients. You can view the CRUSH hierarchy with shadow items +with:: + + ceph osd crush tree --show-shadow + + +Weights sets +------------ + +A *weight set* is an alternative set of weights to use when +calculating data placement. The normal weights associated with each +device in the CRUSH map are set based on the device size and indicate +how much data we *should* be storing where. However, because CRUSH is +based on a pseudorandom placement process, there is always some +variation from this ideal distribution, the same way that rolling a +dice sixty times will not result in rolling exactly 10 ones and 10 +sixes. Weight sets allow the cluster to do a numerical optimization +based on the specifics of your cluster (hierarchy, pools, etc.) to achieve +a balanced distribution. + +There are two types of weight sets supported: + + #. A **compat** weight set is a single alternative set of weights for + each device and node in the cluster. This is not well-suited for + correcting for all anomalies (for example, placement groups for + different pools may be different sizes and have different load + levels, but will be mostly treated the same by the balancer). + However, compat weight sets have the huge advantage that they are + *backward compatible* with previous versions of Ceph, which means + that even though weight sets were first introduced in Luminous + v12.2.z, older clients (e.g., firefly) can still connect to the + cluster when a compat weight set is being used to balance data. + #. A **per-pool** weight set is more flexible in that it allows + placement to be optimized for each data pool. Additionally, + weights can be adjusted for each position of placement, allowing + the optimizer to correct for a suble skew of data toward devices + with small weights relative to their peers (and effect that is + usually only apparently in very large clusters but which can cause + balancing problems). + +When weight sets are in use, the weights associated with each node in +the hierarchy is visible as a separate column (labeled either +``(compat)`` or the pool name) from the command:: + + ceph osd crush tree + +When both *compat* and *per-pool* weight sets are in use, data +placement for a particular pool will use its own per-pool weight set +if present. If not, it will use the compat weight set if present. If +neither are present, it will use the normal CRUSH weights. + +Although weight sets can be set up and manipulated by hand, it is +recommended that the *balancer* module be enabled to do so +automatically. + + +Modifying the CRUSH map +======================= + +.. _addosd: + +Add/Move an OSD +--------------- + +.. note: OSDs are normally automatically added to the CRUSH map when + the OSD is created. This command is rarely needed. + +To add or move an OSD in the CRUSH map of a running cluster:: + + ceph osd crush set {name} {weight} root={root} [{bucket-type}={bucket-name} ...] + +Where: + +``name`` + +:Description: The full name of the OSD. +:Type: String +:Required: Yes +:Example: ``osd.0`` + + +``weight`` + +:Description: The CRUSH weight for the OSD, normally its size measure in terabytes (TB). +:Type: Double +:Required: Yes +:Example: ``2.0`` + + +``root`` + +:Description: The root node of the tree in which the OSD resides (normally ``default``) +:Type: Key/value pair. +:Required: Yes +:Example: ``root=default`` + + +``bucket-type`` + +:Description: You may specify the OSD's location in the CRUSH hierarchy. +:Type: Key/value pairs. +:Required: No +:Example: ``datacenter=dc1 room=room1 row=foo rack=bar host=foo-bar-1`` + + +The following example adds ``osd.0`` to the hierarchy, or moves the +OSD from a previous location. :: + + ceph osd crush set osd.0 1.0 root=default datacenter=dc1 room=room1 row=foo rack=bar host=foo-bar-1 + + +Adjust OSD weight +----------------- + +.. note: Normally OSDs automatically add themselves to the CRUSH map + with the correct weight when they are created. This command + is rarely needed. + +To adjust an OSD's crush weight in the CRUSH map of a running cluster, execute +the following:: + + ceph osd crush reweight {name} {weight} + +Where: + +``name`` + +:Description: The full name of the OSD. +:Type: String +:Required: Yes +:Example: ``osd.0`` + + +``weight`` + +:Description: The CRUSH weight for the OSD. +:Type: Double +:Required: Yes +:Example: ``2.0`` + + +.. _removeosd: + +Remove an OSD +------------- + +.. note: OSDs are normally removed from the CRUSH as part of the + ``ceph osd purge`` command. This command is rarely needed. + +To remove an OSD from the CRUSH map of a running cluster, execute the +following:: + + ceph osd crush remove {name} + +Where: + +``name`` + +:Description: The full name of the OSD. +:Type: String +:Required: Yes +:Example: ``osd.0`` + + +Add a Bucket +------------ + +.. note: Buckets are normally implicitly created when an OSD is added + that specifies a ``{bucket-type}={bucket-name}`` as part of its + location and a bucket with that name does not already exist. This + command is typically used when manually adjusting the structure of the + hierarchy after OSDs have been created (for example, to move a + series of hosts underneath a new rack-level bucket). + +To add a bucket in the CRUSH map of a running cluster, execute the +``ceph osd crush add-bucket`` command:: + + ceph osd crush add-bucket {bucket-name} {bucket-type} + +Where: + +``bucket-name`` + +:Description: The full name of the bucket. +:Type: String +:Required: Yes +:Example: ``rack12`` + + +``bucket-type`` + +:Description: The type of the bucket. The type must already exist in the hierarchy. +:Type: String +:Required: Yes +:Example: ``rack`` + + +The following example adds the ``rack12`` bucket to the hierarchy:: + + ceph osd crush add-bucket rack12 rack + +Move a Bucket +------------- + +To move a bucket to a different location or position in the CRUSH map +hierarchy, execute the following:: + + ceph osd crush move {bucket-name} {bucket-type}={bucket-name}, [...] + +Where: + +``bucket-name`` + +:Description: The name of the bucket to move/reposition. +:Type: String +:Required: Yes +:Example: ``foo-bar-1`` + +``bucket-type`` + +:Description: You may specify the bucket's location in the CRUSH hierarchy. +:Type: Key/value pairs. +:Required: No +:Example: ``datacenter=dc1 room=room1 row=foo rack=bar host=foo-bar-1`` + +Remove a Bucket +--------------- + +To remove a bucket from the CRUSH map hierarchy, execute the following:: + + ceph osd crush remove {bucket-name} + +.. note:: A bucket must be empty before removing it from the CRUSH hierarchy. + +Where: + +``bucket-name`` + +:Description: The name of the bucket that you'd like to remove. +:Type: String +:Required: Yes +:Example: ``rack12`` + +The following example removes the ``rack12`` bucket from the hierarchy:: + + ceph osd crush remove rack12 + +Creating a compat weight set +---------------------------- + +.. note: This step is normally done automatically by the ``balancer`` + module when enabled. + +To create a *compat* weight set:: + + ceph osd crush weight-set create-compat + +Weights for the compat weight set can be adjusted with:: + + ceph osd crush weight-set reweight-compat {name} {weight} + +The compat weight set can be destroyed with:: + + ceph osd crush weight-set rm-compat + +Creating per-pool weight sets +----------------------------- + +To create a weight set for a specific pool,:: + + ceph osd crush weight-set create {pool-name} {mode} + +.. note:: Per-pool weight sets require that all servers and daemons + run Luminous v12.2.z or later. + +Where: + +``pool-name`` + +:Description: The name of a RADOS pool +:Type: String +:Required: Yes +:Example: ``rbd`` + +``mode`` + +:Description: Either ``flat`` or ``positional``. A *flat* weight set + has a single weight for each device or bucket. A + *positional* weight set has a potentially different + weight for each position in the resulting placement + mapping. For example, if a pool has a replica count of + 3, then a positional weight set will have three weights + for each device and bucket. +:Type: String +:Required: Yes +:Example: ``flat`` + +To adjust the weight of an item in a weight set:: + + ceph osd crush weight-set reweight {pool-name} {item-name} {weight [...]} + +To list existing weight sets,:: + + ceph osd crush weight-set ls + +To remove a weight set,:: + + ceph osd crush weight-set rm {pool-name} + +Creating a rule for a replicated pool +------------------------------------- + +For a replicated pool, the primary decision when creating the CRUSH +rule is what the failure domain is going to be. For example, if a +failure domain of ``host`` is selected, then CRUSH will ensure that +each replica of the data is stored on a different host. If ``rack`` +is selected, then each replica will be stored in a different rack. +What failure domain you choose primarily depends on the size of your +cluster and how your hierarchy is structured. + +Normally, the entire cluster hierarchy is nested beneath a root node +named ``default``. If you have customized your hierarchy, you may +want to create a rule nested at some other node in the hierarchy. It +doesn't matter what type is associated with that node (it doesn't have +to be a ``root`` node). + +It is also possible to create a rule that restricts data placement to +a specific *class* of device. By default, Ceph OSDs automatically +classify themselves as either ``hdd`` or ``ssd``, depending on the +underlying type of device being used. These classes can also be +customized. + +To create a replicated rule,:: + + ceph osd crush rule create-replicated {name} {root} {failure-domain-type} [{class}] + +Where: + +``name`` + +:Description: The name of the rule +:Type: String +:Required: Yes +:Example: ``rbd-rule`` + +``root`` + +:Description: The name of the node under which data should be placed. +:Type: String +:Required: Yes +:Example: ``default`` + +``failure-domain-type`` + +:Description: The type of CRUSH nodes across which we should separate replicas. +:Type: String +:Required: Yes +:Example: ``rack`` + +``class`` + +:Description: The device class data should be placed on. +:Type: String +:Required: No +:Example: ``ssd`` + +Creating a rule for an erasure coded pool +----------------------------------------- + +For an erasure-coded pool, the same basic decisions need to be made as +with a replicated pool: what is the failure domain, what node in the +hierarchy will data be placed under (usually ``default``), and will +placement be restricted to a specific device class. Erasure code +pools are created a bit differently, however, because they need to be +constructed carefully based on the erasure code being used. For this reason, +you must include this information in the *erasure code profile*. A CRUSH +rule will then be created from that either explicitly or automatically when +the profile is used to create a pool. + +The erasure code profiles can be listed with:: + + ceph osd erasure-code-profile ls + +An existing profile can be viewed with:: + + ceph osd erasure-code-profile get {profile-name} + +Normally profiles should never be modified; instead, a new profile +should be created and used when creating a new pool or creating a new +rule for an existing pool. + +An erasure code profile consists of a set of key=value pairs. Most of +these control the behavior of the erasure code that is encoding data +in the pool. Those that begin with ``crush-``, however, affect the +CRUSH rule that is created. + +The erasure code profile properties of interest are: + + * **crush-root**: the name of the CRUSH node to place data under [default: ``default``]. + * **crush-failure-domain**: the CRUSH type to separate erasure-coded shards across [default: ``host``]. + * **crush-device-class**: the device class to place data on [default: none, meaning all devices are used]. + * **k** and **m** (and, for the ``lrc`` plugin, **l**): these determine the number of erasure code shards, affecting the resulting CRUSH rule. + +Once a profile is defined, you can create a CRUSH rule with:: + + ceph osd crush rule create-erasure {name} {profile-name} + +.. note: When creating a new pool, it is not actually necessary to + explicitly create the rule. If the erasure code profile alone is + specified and the rule argument is left off then Ceph will create + the CRUSH rule automatically. + +Deleting rules +-------------- + +Rules that are not in use by pools can be deleted with:: + + ceph osd crush rule rm {rule-name} + + +Tunables +======== + +Over time, we have made (and continue to make) improvements to the +CRUSH algorithm used to calculate the placement of data. In order to +support the change in behavior, we have introduced a series of tunable +options that control whether the legacy or improved variation of the +algorithm is used. + +In order to use newer tunables, both clients and servers must support +the new version of CRUSH. For this reason, we have created +``profiles`` that are named after the Ceph version in which they were +introduced. For example, the ``firefly`` tunables are first supported +in the firefly release, and will not work with older (e.g., dumpling) +clients. Once a given set of tunables are changed from the legacy +default behavior, the ``ceph-mon`` and ``ceph-osd`` will prevent older +clients who do not support the new CRUSH features from connecting to +the cluster. + +argonaut (legacy) +----------------- + +The legacy CRUSH behavior used by argonaut and older releases works +fine for most clusters, provided there are not too many OSDs that have +been marked out. + +bobtail (CRUSH_TUNABLES2) +------------------------- + +The bobtail tunable profile fixes a few key misbehaviors: + + * For hierarchies with a small number of devices in the leaf buckets, + some PGs map to fewer than the desired number of replicas. This + commonly happens for hierarchies with "host" nodes with a small + number (1-3) of OSDs nested beneath each one. + + * For large clusters, some small percentages of PGs map to less than + the desired number of OSDs. This is more prevalent when there are + several layers of the hierarchy (e.g., row, rack, host, osd). + + * When some OSDs are marked out, the data tends to get redistributed + to nearby OSDs instead of across the entire hierarchy. + +The new tunables are: + + * ``choose_local_tries``: Number of local retries. Legacy value is + 2, optimal value is 0. + + * ``choose_local_fallback_tries``: Legacy value is 5, optimal value + is 0. + + * ``choose_total_tries``: Total number of attempts to choose an item. + Legacy value was 19, subsequent testing indicates that a value of + 50 is more appropriate for typical clusters. For extremely large + clusters, a larger value might be necessary. + + * ``chooseleaf_descend_once``: Whether a recursive chooseleaf attempt + will retry, or only try once and allow the original placement to + retry. Legacy default is 0, optimal value is 1. + +Migration impact: + + * Moving from argonaut to bobtail tunables triggers a moderate amount + of data movement. Use caution on a cluster that is already + populated with data. + +firefly (CRUSH_TUNABLES3) +------------------------- + +The firefly tunable profile fixes a problem +with the ``chooseleaf`` CRUSH rule behavior that tends to result in PG +mappings with too few results when too many OSDs have been marked out. + +The new tunable is: + + * ``chooseleaf_vary_r``: Whether a recursive chooseleaf attempt will + start with a non-zero value of r, based on how many attempts the + parent has already made. Legacy default is 0, but with this value + CRUSH is sometimes unable to find a mapping. The optimal value (in + terms of computational cost and correctness) is 1. + +Migration impact: + + * For existing clusters that have lots of existing data, changing + from 0 to 1 will cause a lot of data to move; a value of 4 or 5 + will allow CRUSH to find a valid mapping but will make less data + move. + +straw_calc_version tunable (introduced with Firefly too) +-------------------------------------------------------- + +There were some problems with the internal weights calculated and +stored in the CRUSH map for ``straw`` buckets. Specifically, when +there were items with a CRUSH weight of 0 or both a mix of weights and +some duplicated weights CRUSH would distribute data incorrectly (i.e., +not in proportion to the weights). + +The new tunable is: + + * ``straw_calc_version``: A value of 0 preserves the old, broken + internal weight calculation; a value of 1 fixes the behavior. + +Migration impact: + + * Moving to straw_calc_version 1 and then adjusting a straw bucket + (by adding, removing, or reweighting an item, or by using the + reweight-all command) can trigger a small to moderate amount of + data movement *if* the cluster has hit one of the problematic + conditions. + +This tunable option is special because it has absolutely no impact +concerning the required kernel version in the client side. + +hammer (CRUSH_V4) +----------------- + +The hammer tunable profile does not affect the +mapping of existing CRUSH maps simply by changing the profile. However: + + * There is a new bucket type (``straw2``) supported. The new + ``straw2`` bucket type fixes several limitations in the original + ``straw`` bucket. Specifically, the old ``straw`` buckets would + change some mappings that should have changed when a weight was + adjusted, while ``straw2`` achieves the original goal of only + changing mappings to or from the bucket item whose weight has + changed. + + * ``straw2`` is the default for any newly created buckets. + +Migration impact: + + * Changing a bucket type from ``straw`` to ``straw2`` will result in + a reasonably small amount of data movement, depending on how much + the bucket item weights vary from each other. When the weights are + all the same no data will move, and when item weights vary + significantly there will be more movement. + +jewel (CRUSH_TUNABLES5) +----------------------- + +The jewel tunable profile improves the +overall behavior of CRUSH such that significantly fewer mappings +change when an OSD is marked out of the cluster. + +The new tunable is: + + * ``chooseleaf_stable``: Whether a recursive chooseleaf attempt will + use a better value for an inner loop that greatly reduces the number + of mapping changes when an OSD is marked out. The legacy value is 0, + while the new value of 1 uses the new approach. + +Migration impact: + + * Changing this value on an existing cluster will result in a very + large amount of data movement as almost every PG mapping is likely + to change. + + + + +Which client versions support CRUSH_TUNABLES +-------------------------------------------- + + * argonaut series, v0.48.1 or later + * v0.49 or later + * Linux kernel version v3.6 or later (for the file system and RBD kernel clients) + +Which client versions support CRUSH_TUNABLES2 +--------------------------------------------- + + * v0.55 or later, including bobtail series (v0.56.x) + * Linux kernel version v3.9 or later (for the file system and RBD kernel clients) + +Which client versions support CRUSH_TUNABLES3 +--------------------------------------------- + + * v0.78 (firefly) or later + * Linux kernel version v3.15 or later (for the file system and RBD kernel clients) + +Which client versions support CRUSH_V4 +-------------------------------------- + + * v0.94 (hammer) or later + * Linux kernel version v4.1 or later (for the file system and RBD kernel clients) + +Which client versions support CRUSH_TUNABLES5 +--------------------------------------------- + + * v10.0.2 (jewel) or later + * Linux kernel version v4.5 or later (for the file system and RBD kernel clients) + +Warning when tunables are non-optimal +------------------------------------- + +Starting with version v0.74, Ceph will issue a health warning if the +current CRUSH tunables don't include all the optimal values from the +``default`` profile (see below for the meaning of the ``default`` profile). +To make this warning go away, you have two options: + +1. Adjust the tunables on the existing cluster. Note that this will + result in some data movement (possibly as much as 10%). This is the + preferred route, but should be taken with care on a production cluster + where the data movement may affect performance. You can enable optimal + tunables with:: + + ceph osd crush tunables optimal + + If things go poorly (e.g., too much load) and not very much + progress has been made, or there is a client compatibility problem + (old kernel cephfs or rbd clients, or pre-bobtail librados + clients), you can switch back with:: + + ceph osd crush tunables legacy + +2. You can make the warning go away without making any changes to CRUSH by + adding the following option to your ceph.conf ``[mon]`` section:: + + mon warn on legacy crush tunables = false + + For the change to take effect, you will need to restart the monitors, or + apply the option to running monitors with:: + + ceph tell mon.\* injectargs --no-mon-warn-on-legacy-crush-tunables + + +A few important points +---------------------- + + * Adjusting these values will result in the shift of some PGs between + storage nodes. If the Ceph cluster is already storing a lot of + data, be prepared for some fraction of the data to move. + * The ``ceph-osd`` and ``ceph-mon`` daemons will start requiring the + feature bits of new connections as soon as they get + the updated map. However, already-connected clients are + effectively grandfathered in, and will misbehave if they do not + support the new feature. + * If the CRUSH tunables are set to non-legacy values and then later + changed back to the defult values, ``ceph-osd`` daemons will not be + required to support the feature. However, the OSD peering process + requires examining and understanding old maps. Therefore, you + should not run old versions of the ``ceph-osd`` daemon + if the cluster has previously used non-legacy CRUSH values, even if + the latest version of the map has been switched back to using the + legacy defaults. + +Tuning CRUSH +------------ + +The simplest way to adjust the crush tunables is by changing to a known +profile. Those are: + + * ``legacy``: the legacy behavior from argonaut and earlier. + * ``argonaut``: the legacy values supported by the original argonaut release + * ``bobtail``: the values supported by the bobtail release + * ``firefly``: the values supported by the firefly release + * ``hammer``: the values supported by the hammer release + * ``jewel``: the values supported by the jewel release + * ``optimal``: the best (ie optimal) values of the current version of Ceph + * ``default``: the default values of a new cluster installed from + scratch. These values, which depend on the current version of Ceph, + are hard coded and are generally a mix of optimal and legacy values. + These values generally match the ``optimal`` profile of the previous + LTS release, or the most recent release for which we generally except + more users to have up to date clients for. + +You can select a profile on a running cluster with the command:: + + ceph osd crush tunables {PROFILE} + +Note that this may result in some data movement. + + +.. _CRUSH - Controlled, Scalable, Decentralized Placement of Replicated Data: https://ceph.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/weil-crush-sc06.pdf + + +Primary Affinity +================ + +When a Ceph Client reads or writes data, it always contacts the primary OSD in +the acting set. For set ``[2, 3, 4]``, ``osd.2`` is the primary. Sometimes an +OSD is not well suited to act as a primary compared to other OSDs (e.g., it has +a slow disk or a slow controller). To prevent performance bottlenecks +(especially on read operations) while maximizing utilization of your hardware, +you can set a Ceph OSD's primary affinity so that CRUSH is less likely to use +the OSD as a primary in an acting set. :: + + ceph osd primary-affinity <osd-id> <weight> + +Primary affinity is ``1`` by default (*i.e.,* an OSD may act as a primary). You +may set the OSD primary range from ``0-1``, where ``0`` means that the OSD may +**NOT** be used as a primary and ``1`` means that an OSD may be used as a +primary. When the weight is ``< 1``, it is less likely that CRUSH will select +the Ceph OSD Daemon to act as a primary. + + + |