summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/src/ceph/doc/cephfs/full.rst
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'src/ceph/doc/cephfs/full.rst')
-rw-r--r--src/ceph/doc/cephfs/full.rst60
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 60 deletions
diff --git a/src/ceph/doc/cephfs/full.rst b/src/ceph/doc/cephfs/full.rst
deleted file mode 100644
index cc9eb59..0000000
--- a/src/ceph/doc/cephfs/full.rst
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,60 +0,0 @@
-
-Handling a full Ceph filesystem
-===============================
-
-When a RADOS cluster reaches its ``mon_osd_full_ratio`` (default
-95%) capacity, it is marked with the OSD full flag. This flag causes
-most normal RADOS clients to pause all operations until it is resolved
-(for example by adding more capacity to the cluster).
-
-The filesystem has some special handling of the full flag, explained below.
-
-Hammer and later
-----------------
-
-Since the hammer release, a full filesystem will lead to ENOSPC
-results from:
-
- * Data writes on the client
- * Metadata operations other than deletes and truncates
-
-Because the full condition may not be encountered until
-data is flushed to disk (sometime after a ``write`` call has already
-returned 0), the ENOSPC error may not be seen until the application
-calls ``fsync`` or ``fclose`` (or equivalent) on the file handle.
-
-Calling ``fsync`` is guaranteed to reliably indicate whether the data
-made it to disk, and will return an error if it doesn't. ``fclose`` will
-only return an error if buffered data happened to be flushed since
-the last write -- a successful ``fclose`` does not guarantee that the
-data made it to disk, and in a full-space situation, buffered data
-may be discarded after an ``fclose`` if no space is available to persist it.
-
-.. warning::
- If an application appears to be misbehaving on a full filesystem,
- check that it is performing ``fsync()`` calls as necessary to ensure
- data is on disk before proceeding.
-
-Data writes may be cancelled by the client if they are in flight at the
-time the OSD full flag is sent. Clients update the ``osd_epoch_barrier``
-when releasing capabilities on files affected by cancelled operations, in
-order to ensure that these cancelled operations do not interfere with
-subsequent access to the data objects by the MDS or other clients. For
-more on the epoch barrier mechanism, see :ref:`background_blacklisting_and_osd_epoch_barrier`.
-
-Legacy (pre-hammer) behavior
-----------------------------
-
-In versions of Ceph earlier than hammer, the MDS would ignore
-the full status of the RADOS cluster, and any data writes from
-clients would stall until the cluster ceased to be full.
-
-There are two dangerous conditions to watch for with this behaviour:
-
-* If a client had pending writes to a file, then it was not possible
- for the client to release the file to the MDS for deletion: this could
- lead to difficulty clearing space on a full filesystem
-* If clients continued to create a large number of empty files, the
- resulting metadata writes from the MDS could lead to total exhaustion
- of space on the OSDs such that no further deletions could be performed.
-