summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/VNFs/DPPD-PROX/main.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2019-02-07Add check for configuration error (not enough mbuf)Xavier Simonart1-1/+24
Number of mbufs must at least cover for number of rx descriptors, number of tx descriptors, number of mbuf cached and number of mbufs handled by the application. If this is not the case, a warning is returned. This ony check for the more basic cases. This will not check for instance for cases with multiples rings where more mbufs might be cached. Change-Id: If2c0c9fc76ed4500849d92cf7586bb0b25d8ab22 Signed-off-by: Xavier Simonart <xavier.simonart@intel.com>
2018-12-13Fix arp handling when master core is on socket 1Xavier Simonart1-1/+1
When master core was on socket 1, the rings setup to exchange messages related to arp between dataplane cores and master core was not properly setup, resulting in arp not working. Change-Id: Icc08df81f2e39e53de7c212248cdc7b78d7e2618 Signed-off-by: Xavier Simonart <xavier.simonart@intel.com>
2018-12-13Clean up debugging messagesXavier Simonart1-1/+1
Print IP address in a.b.c.d format instead of one 32-bit number. Better align debugging information in log file Change-Id: Icfab30836ba83d53f700fcfbdfbd7cf238ed7bf8 Signed-off-by: Xavier Simonart <xavier.simonart@intel.com>
2018-10-31Merge "Fix potential crash when shuffling mbufs"Deepak S1-2/+3
2018-10-31Support for DPDK 18.05 and DPDK 18.08Xavier Simonart1-30/+84
Improve DPDK 18.05 support introduced by 3e532aca. Support for DPDK 18.08. Change-Id: Ide712ee94254b506a0ad88c95a7e01b789f99d48 Signed-off-by: Xavier Simonart <xavier.simonart@intel.com>
2018-10-30Fix potential crash when shuffling mbufsXavier Simonart1-2/+3
Change-Id: I70de6345afc6a696906f006c1b0f44540ae4ecec Signed-off-by: Xavier Simonart <xavier.simonart@intel.com>
2018-05-25Increase default mbuf size and code simplification/cleanupXavier Simonart1-41/+41
mbuf size was setup to achieve the best performance i.e. using the smallest mbuf and not segmenting packets. However this resulted in complex code, much dependent of the way the pmd are working e.g. a change(fix) in recent dpdk i40e implementation caused a 1782 (=1518+8+256) bytes mbuf to be too small to hold a 1518 bytes packets. Hence this change simplifies the mbuf size selection at the price of a potential decreases in performance - as more memory is now used. Except if jumbo frames are used, the mbuf size will now be the same for all modes. The packets will not be segmented except if jumbo frames are enabled. If jumbo frames are enabled, packets are by default segmented, except if the mbuf size is configured big enough in the config file. Change-Id: I222fcac7a65c0d221d5d422f419deb9c0f864172 Signed-off-by: Xavier Simonart <xavier.simonart@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Deepak S <deepak.s@linux.intel.com>
2018-04-26Fix crc offloads.Xavier Simonart1-4/+4
When configuring a port, prox configures queue flags. For historitical reasons, offloads had to be disabled on some pmds. There is now an API to query the ports and gets their capabilities. This fix sets now the flags based on the capabilities, and not the driver name. Change-Id: Ic72d15001992f26910f653c70d31e4381fff8089 Signed-off-by: Xavier Simonart <xavier.simonart@intel.com>
2018-04-15Add support for reception of jumbo framesXavier Simonart1-33/+63
Jumbo frames are now supported through the addition of a "mtu" parameter of the port in the config file. Setting the mtu to a value higher than 1500 bytes will enable the reception of jumbo frames. In addition, the rte_eth_dev_set_mtu is now set for all pmds. Finally, setting mbuf_size does not set MEMPOOL_F_NO_SPREAD anymore. This option was only used for pure debugging. Big packets can be received using two ways - Using multiple "small" mbufs, i.e. around 2K. This is the default. - Using one big mbuf holding the whole packet. This can be enabled by setting a parameter mbuf_size in the receiving core configuration Change-Id: Idd60ad31f41c89f9522dff4d894af2696b7a2ea1 Signed-off-by: Xavier Simonart <xavier.simonart@intel.com>
2017-12-18Add l3 support for tasks without physical tx portsXavier Simonart1-6/+3
This adds support for tasks in l3 submode receiving from ports but transmitting to rings. ARP related information is exchanged between tasks through master core. Tasks transmitting to physical ports are responsible to transmit arp related packets. Tasks not transmitting to physical ports (and using rings) should not try to transmit arp packets. Transmitting arp packets through ring would be more complex, as we would need extra information (within the mbuf) to distinguish for instance an arp reply comoing from the network and an arp reply coming from a core (as a reply to an arp request). Change-Id: Ib55dc8c39d5e55703a933faa16bcc008f1274929 Signed-off-by: Xavier Simonart <xavier.simonart@intel.com>
2017-11-15Add support for nop mode with l3 submodeXavier Simonart1-7/+31
The l3 submode was not supported in nop mode, as the nop mode uses some specific nop thread (and not generic). When L3 is specified, the nop mode must use the generic thread. In addition the l3 submode is implemented differently than other submodes. It is not supported through task_init structures (i.e. each task does not have to explicitely tell that it supports l3 submode). But this prevented to run both a nop with no submode and a nop with a l3 submode. Note that nop with l3 is usually not very useful - it handles arp (requests and response) but as nop, it does not swap IP addresses. So with a real switch, the packets transmitted will be received back... and l3 mode is usually mainly usefull when using a switch. However, there is at least one nop mode where l3 submode makes sense: when the nop does not transmit. In such cases, for instace used in conjunction with a gen l3, the nop receives all packets and forward the arp requests and responses to the master for handling. Change-Id: I992121db285ba25a11cbb494092a6afc6fe55a58 Signed-off-by: Xavier Simonart <xavier.simonart@intel.com>
2017-10-25Merge changes from PROX-v041Patrice Buriez1-13/+90
Change-Id: Ie6d4e7ce22c27967117a446626f5923643397812 Signed-off-by: Patrice Buriez <patrice.buriez@intel.com>
2017-07-14Adding PROX(Packet pROcessing eXecution engine) VNF to sampleVNFDeepak S1-0/+993
JIRA: SAMPLEVNF-55 PROX is a DPDK-based application implementing Telco use-cases such as a simplified BRAS/BNG, light-weight AFTR... It also allows configuring finer grained network functions like QoS, Routing, load-balancing... (We are moving PROX version v039 to sampleVNF https://01.org/intel-data-plane-performance-demonstrators/prox-overview) Change-Id: Ia3cb02cf0e49ac5596e922c197ff7e010293d033 Signed-off-by: Deepak S <deepak.s@linux.intel.com>