From Arno to Colorado

Functest: Many rivers to cross

Functest contributors

OPNFV Design Summit, 20/6/2016, Berlin

“Bad programmers have all the answers. Good testers have all the questions. Gil Zilberfeld - ”

# Agenda * Functest * Arno * Brahmaputra * Colorado * D, E, F rivers and beyond

# The dream team ![team](../../../img/teamSummitBerlin.png)

# Functest: what for?

## Our goals ### make sure OPNFV works......

## so concretely... * Validate scenarios for the release * Give confidence on OPNFV fresh releases * Ensure consistancy towards installers * Ensure End to End interoperability

## and also * Provide functional test suites to be replayed * ~ post install sanity check * usable for plugfests * coherent with ETSI and Telco needs * Provide test tools * run tests * collect info * create dashboard

## Our goals are not.... * Performance testing (yardstick, Xperf ) * Re-do tests done in specific projects * storage/storeperf * infra audit/qtip * Compare results

## Our rules * Re-use as much as possible upstream suites (Rally, Tempest, Robot, testOn..) * Keep it simple... * Automate (if not it is not a test...) * Create new suites only if tests not covered * Consider fields not addressed by existing test projects

## Our rules * Installer neutral * Controller neutral * Black box approach

# Arno

## Proof of concept * 4 Testcases: vPing (userdata), Tempest, Rally, ODL * 1 scenario: os-odl_l2-nofeature-ha * 2 installers: Foreman/Fuel * Lots of manual operations (reporting, documentation)

# Brahmaputra

## More everything.... * 7 Testcases: vPing (ssh), ONOS, vIMS, Tempest and Rally extended * 3 feature projects: doctor, promise, sdnvpn * 13 Scenarios * 4 Installers (Apex, Compass, Fuel, Joid) * Test result collection * Automatic dashboard

Jiras

Brahmaputra Scenario matrix

Comparison odl_l2-nofeature-ha scenario

Project	Apex	Compass	Fuel	Joid
POD	LF POD1	Huawei US	Ericsson POD2	Orange POD2
Functest	2h50	1h45	2h35	2h30
Yardstick	1h05	1h00	1h00	0h55

* difference of duration due to POD and test suites

## Lessons learned * Tempest/Rally * harmonizing installer related OpenStack configuration differences * creating customized test lists * main challenge was resolving SDN controller interworking problems * vIMS * complete but complex test case * very interesting to automate (pre MANO, most of Telco needs met there)

# Colorado

## What's new? * New internal test cases: healthcheck, security * New controler: OpenContrail? * New feature projects (domino, multisites, movie, parser, moon, copper, models, onos-sfc...) * ARM Support (congratulations to ENEA team!) * Simplified feature project integration journey

## What's new? * Slicing of the tests (healthcheck / Smoke / SDN controllers / Features / Components / VNFs) * Better Test duration management * Refactoring (repo, case management, TestAPI) * Automatic reporting * Dashboard evolution to ELK * CLI

Automatic reporting

Validated scenarios for Colorado

# Many rivers to cross ## Functest beyond Colorado

## More test cases * New VNFs (vEPC, vCDN, vWhatever...) * Multi sites (e.g bgpvpn with different back ends) * Better test coverage

## A Functional testing As a Service framework * Scenario owner can select their relevant test cases * Test duration estimation * Agile dashboarding * Analytics

## Upstream * Rally: time to give back more * Functest description for ETSI?

Thank you