Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|
This change clarifies the scope of the document. As edge clouds
"on the other side of radio" are not discussed in the document at
all they should be removed from the scope explicitly.
Change-Id: Ie35566f6ffed9b83dbe859046886bd1004e28ca2
Signed-off-by: Gergely Csatari <gergely.csatari@nokia.com>
|
|
Change-Id: If582c127283d6d1fd862c1ba6f96d11d332582f6
Signed-off-by: Gergely Csatari <gergely.csatari@nokia.com>
|
|
|
|
Change-Id: I7f7a8a6bdd8503d1897f69837a885a6575686db2
Signed-off-by: Gergely Csatari <gergely.csatari@nokia.com>
|
|
Deployment scenarios defined in the OpenStack Edge Computing Groups
Dublin workshop notes [1] and in the initial change set of OPNFV
Edge Cloud requirements document [1]. As the definition of deployment
scenarios should be maintained only in one place OpenStack Edge
Computing Group agreed [3] to merge the Dublin deployment scenarios
to the OPNFV Edge Cloud requirements document in a way that in case of
small and middle edge clouds the Dublin definitions are valid while
in case of large edge clouds the OPNFV Edge Cloud definition is calid.
This change implements this decision on top of [2].
[1]: https://wiki.openstack.org/w/index.php?title=OpenStack_Edge_Discussions_Dublin_PTG#Deployment_Scenarios
[2]: https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/58959/
[3]: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/weekly_edge_computing_group_call/2018/weekly_edge_computing_group_call.2018-07-10-14.03.html
Change-Id: Id647cbf2cc6af1ea53412616d622e06b349b6279
Signed-off-by: Gergely Csatari <gergely.csatari@nokia.com>
|
|
Change-Id: Id2b45c8279a477068921b685c8b820bba87d6483
Signed-off-by: Cristina Pauna <cristina.pauna@enea.com>
|