summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorGergely Csatari <gergely.csatari@nokia.com>2018-10-18 10:11:31 +0200
committerGergely Csatari <gergely.csatari@nokia.com>2018-10-18 16:24:10 +0200
commit3708debe3f7ff9edd0f0a52998ebf7a799bb712f (patch)
tree058c82e8398339607e6fcee65c07a82aa6e22642
parent63c1d0f1b1dfc5b64f9b50f20a55e7dcc5d8ca5b (diff)
Allowing resource optimized OpenStackstable/gambia
One option for the deployment of edge cloud infrastructures is to use different instances of the same resource optimized OpenStack in both the large, medium and small edge sites. This change adds this as an alternative to the usage of different OpenStack deployment variants in the different sites. Change-Id: Icdcdb7fb8b0cb43f36b2f53ef74278475aa9817e Signed-off-by: Gergely Csatari <gergely.csatari@nokia.com>
-rw-r--r--docs/development/requirements/images/EdgeStructure.pngbin81884 -> 81553 bytes
-rw-r--r--docs/development/requirements/images/figure-sources.pptxbin153731 -> 153741 bytes
-rw-r--r--docs/development/requirements/requirements.rst27
3 files changed, 15 insertions, 12 deletions
diff --git a/docs/development/requirements/images/EdgeStructure.png b/docs/development/requirements/images/EdgeStructure.png
index b44ae8b..4852d56 100644
--- a/docs/development/requirements/images/EdgeStructure.png
+++ b/docs/development/requirements/images/EdgeStructure.png
Binary files differ
diff --git a/docs/development/requirements/images/figure-sources.pptx b/docs/development/requirements/images/figure-sources.pptx
index 3112cb6..89ef94d 100644
--- a/docs/development/requirements/images/figure-sources.pptx
+++ b/docs/development/requirements/images/figure-sources.pptx
Binary files differ
diff --git a/docs/development/requirements/requirements.rst b/docs/development/requirements/requirements.rst
index 7e3e90d..dde2e6e 100644
--- a/docs/development/requirements/requirements.rst
+++ b/docs/development/requirements/requirements.rst
@@ -161,16 +161,16 @@ Features of Edge
================
-Lighter weight control
-======================
+Resource optimized control
+==========================
As space and power resources are limited in edge sites and edge usually has
fewer number of servers (the number varies from a few to several dozens), it is
-unnecessary to deploy orchestrator or VNFM. VIM (e.g.: OpenStack or Kubernetes)
-and SDN would be deployed in light weight manner to save resources for services.
-Detailed functions of light weight VIM and SDN have not been discussed yet,
-but basic functions such as VM lifecycle management and automatic network
-management should be persisted.
+unnecessary to deploy orchestrator or VNFM. The depolyed VIM (e.g.: OpenStack
+or Kubernetes) and SDN would be optimized for low resource usage to save
+resources for services. Resource optimisation of VIM and SDN have not been
+discussed yet, but basic functions such as VM lifecycle management and
+automatic network management should be persisted.
Remote provisioning
====================
@@ -373,11 +373,14 @@ also under the remote provisioning of OpenStack in large edge sites.
:alt: Hierarchical OpenStack
:align: center
-For large edge sites, OpenStack would be fully deployed. Its Keystone and Horizon
-would provide unified tenant and UI management for both itself and remote middle
-and small edge sites. Middle edge sites would have OpenStack with neccessary
-services like Nova, Neutron and Glance. Small edge site, which has server number
-less than 20, would use light weight OpenStack.
+Optionally for large edge sites, OpenStack would be fully deployed. Its
+Keystone and Horizon would provide unified tenant and UI management for both
+itself and remote middle and small edge sites. In this case middle edge sites
+would have OpenStack with neccessary services like Nova, Neutron and Glance.
+While small edge site would use resource optimized weight OpenStack.
+
+Other option is to use different instances of the same resource optimized
+OpenStack to control both large, medium and small edge sites.
More detalis: TBD