diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'docs/testing/user')
27 files changed, 8821 insertions, 1225 deletions
diff --git a/docs/testing/user/certificationworkflow/ApplicationForm.rst b/docs/testing/user/certificationworkflow/ApplicationForm.rst index e69de29b..9199d71e 100644 --- a/docs/testing/user/certificationworkflow/ApplicationForm.rst +++ b/docs/testing/user/certificationworkflow/ApplicationForm.rst @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ +.. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. +.. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 +.. (c) OPNFV, Intel Corporation and others. + +.._cvp-application-form: + +====================================================== +OPNFV COMPLIANCE VERIFICATION PROGRAM APPLICATION FORM +====================================================== + diff --git a/docs/testing/user/certificationworkflow/index.rst b/docs/testing/user/certificationworkflow/index.rst index e69de29b..d26fe5d8 100644 --- a/docs/testing/user/certificationworkflow/index.rst +++ b/docs/testing/user/certificationworkflow/index.rst @@ -0,0 +1,122 @@ +.. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. +.. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 +.. (c) Intel Corporation, Ericsson AB, Huawei, and others + +================================================================ +OPNFV Compliance Verification Program certification workflow +================================================================ + +.. toctree:: + :maxdepth: 2 + +Introduction +============ + +This document provides guidance for testers on how to obtain OPNFV compliance +certification. The OPNFV Compliance Verification Program (CVP) is administered by +the OPNFV Compliance and Certification (C&C) committee. + +For further information about the workflow and general inquiries about the +program, please check out the CVP web portal https://cvp.opnfv.org, or contact +the C&C committee by email address cvp@opnfv.org. This email address should be used +for all communication with the CVP. + +Step 1: Applying +================ + +A tester should start the process by completing an application. +The application form can found on the CVP portal and the following +information should be provided: + + - Organization name + - Organization website (if public) + - Product name and/or identifier + - Product specifications + - Product public documentation + - Product categories, choose one: (i) software and hardware (ii) software + and third party hardware (please specify) + - Primary contact name, business email, postal address and phone number + Only the primary email address should be used for + official communication with OPNFV CVP. + - User ID for CVP web portal + The CVP web portal supports (i) Linux Foundation user ID, and (ii) Openstack user + ID, in the current release. Specify either one as user ID for the CVP web portal. + If a new user ID is needed, visit https://identity.linuxfoundation.org, or + https://www.openstack.org/join/register. + - Location where the verification testing is to be conducted. Choose one: + (internal vendor lab, third-party lab) + - If the test is to be conducted by a third-party lab, please specify + name and contact information of the third-party lab, including email, address and + phone number. + +Please email the completed application using the primary contact email +account in order to establish identity. + +Once the application information is received and in order, an email response will be +sent to the primary contact with confirmation and information to proceed. + +[Editor's note: +No fee has been established at this time for CVP applications. Recommend +we skip fee for the initial release of CVP.] + +Step 2: Testing +=============== + +The following documents guide testers to prepare the test environment and run tests: + + - System Requirements and Preparation Guide for OPNFV CVP [2] + - OPNFV CVP Test Case Specifications [3] + - Dovetail Test Tool User Guide [4] + +[Editor's note: The above three documents are still work in progress. Names and +references will be corrected when they are merged.] + +A unique Test ID is generated by the Dovetail tool for each test run. Please take a note +of this ID for future reference. + +Step 3: Submitting Test Results +=============================== + +Testers can upload the test results to the CVP web portal https://cvp.opnfv.org. +By default, the results are visible only to the tester who uploaded the data. + +Testers can self-review the test results through the portal until they are ready to ask +for CVP review. They may also update with or add new test results as needed. + +Once the tester is satisfied with the test result, the tester grants access to the test result +for CVP review via the portal. The test result is identified by the unique Test ID. + +When a test result is made visible to the reviewers, the web portal will notify +cvp@opnfv.org and Cc the primary contact email that a review request has been made and reference +the Test ID. This will alert the C&C Committee to start the CVP review process. + +Step 4: CVP Review +=================== + +Upon receiving the email notification and the Test ID, the C&C Committee conducts a +peer based review of the test result. Persons employed by the same organization that submitted +the test results or by affiliated organizations will not be part of the reviewers. + +The primary contact may be asked via email for any missing information or +clarification of the application. The reviewers will make a determination and recommend +compliance or non-compliance to +the C&C Committee. Normally, the outcome of the review should be communicated +to the tester within 10 business days after all required information is in order. + +If an application is denied, an appeal can be made to the C&C Committee or ultimately to the +Board of Directors of OPNFV. + +Step 5: Grant of Use of Logo +============================ + +If an application is approved, further information will be communicated to the tester +on the guidelines of using OPNFV CVP logos and the status of compliance for promotional purposes. + +References +========== + +[1] The OPNFV CVP Guidelines v.16 [Editor's note: link to be provided.] +[2] System Requirements and Preparation Guide for OPNFV CVP [Editor's note: link to be provided.] +[3] OPNFV CVP Test Case Specifications v1.0 [Editor's note: link to be provided.] +[4] Dovetail Test Tool User Guide v1.0 [Editor's note: link to be provided.] + diff --git a/docs/testing/user/cvpaddendum/index.rst b/docs/testing/user/cvpaddendum/index.rst new file mode 100644 index 00000000..ee356ff9 --- /dev/null +++ b/docs/testing/user/cvpaddendum/index.rst @@ -0,0 +1,388 @@ +.. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International +.. License. +.. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 +.. (c) Intel and others + +==================================================================== +Compliance Verification Program - Guidelines Addendum for Danube +==================================================================== + +.. toctree:: + :maxdepth: 2 + + +Introduction +============ + +This addendum provides a high-level description of the testing scope and +pass/fail criteria used in the Compliance Verification Program (CVP) for the +OPNFV Danube release. This information is intended as an overview for CVP +testers and for the Dovetail Project to help guide test-tool and test-case +development for the OPNFV Danube release. The Dovetail project is responsible for documenting +test-case specifications as well as implementing the CVP tool-chain through collaboration +with the OPNFV testing community. CVP testing focuses on establishing the +ability of the System Under Test (SUT) to perform NFVI and VIM operations and support +Service Provider oriented features that ensure manageable, resilient and secure +networks. + + +Meaning of Compliance +===================== + +OPNFV Compliance indicates adherence to NFV platform behavior defined as +various platform capabilities or features to prepare, instantiate, operate and remove +VNFs running on the NFVI. Danube compliance evaluates the ability of a platform +to support Service Provider network capabilities and workloads that are +supported in the OPNFV platform as of this release. Compliance test cases shall +be designated as compulsory or optional based on the maturity of OPNFV +capabilities as well as industry expectations. Compulsory test cases may for +example include NFVI management capabilities whereas tests for certain +high-availability features may be deemed as optional. + +Test coverage and pass/fail criteria are +designed to ensure an acceptable level of compliance but not be so restrictive +as to disqualify variations in platform implementations, capabilities and features. + + +SUT Assumptions +=============== + +Assumptions about the System Under Test (SUT) include ... + + - The minimal specification of physical infrastructure, including controller + nodes, compute nodes and networks, is defined by the Pharos specification + [2]. + - The SUT is fully deployed and operational, i.e. SUT deployment tools are + out of scope of testing. + + +Scope of Testing +================ + +The OPNFV CVP Guidelines [1], as approved by the Board of Directors, outlines +the key objectives of the CVP as follows: + - Help build the market for + - OPNFV based infrastructure + - applications designed to run on that infrastructure + - Reduce adoption risks for end-users + - Decrease testing costs by verifying hardware and software platform + interfaces and components + - Enhance interoperability + +The guidelines further directs the scope to be constrained to "features, +capabilities, components, and interfaces included in an OPNFV release that are +generally available in the industry (e.g., through adoption by an upstream +community)", and that compliance verification is evaluated using "functional tests +that focus on defined interfaces and/or behaviors without regard to the +the implementation of the underlying system under test". + +OPNFV provides a broad range of capabilities, including the reference platform itself +as well as tools-chains and methodologies for building infrastructures, and +deploying and testing the platform. +Not all these aspects are in scope for CVP and not all functions and +components are tested in the initial version of CVP. For example, the deployment tools +for the SUT and CI/CD toolchain are currently out of scope. +Similarly, performance benchmarking related testing is also out of scope or +for further study. Newer functional areas such as MANO (outside of APIs in the NFVI and +VIM) are still developing and are for future considerations. + +General Approach +---------------- + +In order to meet the above objectives for CVP, we aim to follow a general approach +by first identifying the overall requirements for all stake-holders, +then analyzing what OPNFV and the upstream communities can effectively test and verify +presently to derive an initial working scope for CVP, and to recommend what the +community should strive to achieve in future releases. + +The overall requirements for CVP can be cateorized by the basic cloud +capabilities representing common operations needed by basic VNFs, and additional +requirements for VNFs that go beyond the common cloud capabilities including +functional extensions, operational capabilities and additional carrier grade +requirements. + +For the basic NFV requirements, we will analyze the required test cases, +leverage or improve upon existing test cases in OPNFV projects +and upstream projects whenever we can, and bridge the gaps when we must, to meet +these basic requirements. + +We are not yet ready to support requirements +such as hardware portability, carrier grade performance, fault management and other +operational features, security, MANO and VNF verification. +These areas are being studied for future considerations. + +In some areas, we will start with a limited level of verification +initially, constrained by what community resources are able to support at this +time, but still serve a basic need that is not being fulfilled elsewhere. +In these areas, we bring significant value to the community we +serve by starting a new area of verification, breaking new ground and +expanding it in the future. + +In other areas, the functions being verified have yet to reach +wide adoption but are seen as important requirements in NFV, +or features are only needed for specific NFV use cases but +an industry consensus about the APIs and behaviors is still deemed beneficial. In such +cases, we plan to incorporate the test areas as optional. An optional test +area will not have to be run or passed in order to achieve compliance. +Optional tests provide an opportunity for vendors to demonstrate compliance with specific OPNFV +features beyond the mandatory test scope. + +Analysis of Scope +----------------- + +Following on these high level objectives and the identified general approach, +we seek to define the initial verification scope by the analysis summarized +in the following categories: + +1. Basic Cloud Capabilities + +The intent of these tests is to verify that the SUT has the required +capabilities that a basic VNF needs, and these capabilities are implemented +in a way that enables this basic VNF to run on any OPNFV compliant +deployment. + +A basic VNF can be thought of as a single virtual machine that is networked +and can perform the simplest network functions, for example, a simple forwarding +gateway, or a set of such virtual machines connected only by simple virtual network +services. Running such basic VNF leads to a set of common requirements, including: + - image management (Refstack testing Glance API) + - identity management (Refstack testing Keystone Identity API) + - virtual compute (Refstack testing Nova Compute API) + - virtual storage (Refstack testing Cinder API) + - virtual networks (Refstack testing Neutron Network API) + - forwarding packets through virtual networks in data path + - filtering packets based on security rules and port security in data path + - dynamic network runtime operations through the life of a VNF (e.g. attach/detach, + enable/disable, read stats) + - correct behavior after common virtual machine life cycles events (e.g. + suspend/resume, reboot, migrate) + - simple virtual machine resource scheduling on multiple nodes + +OPNFV mainly supports Openstack as the VIM up to the Danube release. The +VNFs used in the CVP program, and features in scope for the program which are +considered to be basic to all VNFs, require commercial Openstack distributions +to support a common basic level of cloud capabilities, and to be compliant +to a common specification for these capabilities. This requirement significantly +overlaps with Openstack community's Interop working group's goals, but they are not +identical. The CVP runs the Openstack Refstack-Compute test cases to verify +compliance to the basic common API requirements of cloud +management functions and VNF (as a VM) management for OPNFV. +Additional NFV specific requirements are added in network data path validation, +packet filtering by security group rules and port security, life cycle runtime events of +virtual networks, multiple networks in a topology, validation +of VNF's functional state after common lifecylce events including reboot, pause, +suspense, stop/start and cold migration. In addition, the +basic requirement also verifies that the SUT can allocate VNF resources based +on simple anti-affinity rules. + +The combined test cases help to ensure that these basic operations are always +supported by a compliant platform and they adhere to +a common standard to enable portability across OPNFV compliant platforms. + +2. NFV specific functional requirements + +NFV has functional requirements beyond the basic common cloud +capabilities, esp. in the networking area. Examples like SDNVPN, IPv6, SFC may +be considered additional NFV requirements beyond general purpose cloud +computing. These feature requirements expand beyond common Openstack (or other +VIM) requirements. OPNFV CVP will incorporate test cases to verify +compliance in these areas as they become mature. Because these extensions +may impose new API demands, maturity and industry adoption is a prerequisite for +making them a mandatory requirement for OPNFV compliance. At the time of Danube, +we have not identified a new functional area that is mandatory for CVP. +In the meantime, CVP +intends to offer tests in some of these areas as an optional extension of the test +report to be submitted for review, noting that passing these tests will not be +required to pass OPNFV compliance verification. + +SDNVPN is relevant due to the wide adoption of MPLS/BGP based VPNs in wide area +networks, which makes it necessary for data centers hosting VNFs to be able to +seamlessly interconnect with such networks. IPv6 is a high priority service provider +requirement to ease IP addressing and operational issues. SFC is also an important +NFV requirement, however its implementation has not yet been accepted or adopted +in the upstream at the time of Danube. + +3. High availability + +High availability is a common carrier grade requirement. Availability of a +platform involves many aspects of the SUT, for example hardware or lower layer +system failures or system overloads, and is also highly dependent on +configurations. The current OPNFV high availability verification focuses on +Openstack control service failures and resource overloads, and verifies service +continuity when the system encounters such failures or resource overloads, and +also verifies the system heals after a failure episode within a reasonable time +window. These service HA capabilities are commonly adopted in the industry +and should be a mandatory requirement. + +The current test cases in HA cover the basic area of failure and resource +overload conditions for a cloud platform's service availability, including all +of the basic cloud capability services, and basic compute and storage loads, +so it is a meaningful first step for CVP. We expect additional high availability +scenarios be extended in future releases. + +4. Resiliency + +Resiliency testing involves stressing the SUT and verifying its ability +to absorb stress conditions and still provide an acceptable level of service. +Resiliency is an important requirement for end-users. + +The OPNFV testing projects have started testing +OPNFV system resiliency in +the Danube release that can be used to provide limited coverage in this area. +However, this is a relatively new test methodology in OPNFV, additional study +and testing experiences are still needed. We defer the resilency testing to +future CVP releases. + +5. Security + +Security is among the top priorities as a carrier grade requirement by the +end-users. Some of the basic common functions, including virtual network isolation, +security groups, port security and role based access control are already covered as +part of the basic cloud capabilities that are verified in CVP. These test cases +however do not yet cover the basic required security capabilities expected of an end-user +deployment. It is an area that we should address in the near future, to define +a common set of requirements and develop test cases for verifying those +requirements. + +Another common requirement is security vulnerability scanning. +While the OPNFV security project integrated tools for security vulnerability +scanning, this has not been fully analyzed or exercised in Danube release. +This area needs further work to identify the required level of security for the +purpose of OPNFV in order to be integrated into the CVP. End-user inputs on +specific requirements in security is needed. + +6. Service assurance + +Service assurance (SA) is a broad area of concern for reliability of the NFVI/VIM +and VNFs, and depends upon multiple subsystems of an NFV platform for essential +information and control mechanisms. These subsystems include telemetry, fault management +(e.g. alarms), performance management, audits, and control mechanisms such as security +and configuration policies. + +The current Danube release implements some enabling capabilities in NFVI/VIM +such as telemetry, policy, and fault management. However, the specification of expected +system components, behavior and the test cases to verify them have not yet +been adequately developed. We will therefore not be testing this area at this time +but defer to future study. + +7. Use case testing + +More complex interactions among multiple VNFs and between VNFs and the cloud +platform can be better exercised through selected more realistic use cases. + +End-users see use case level testing as a significant tool in +verifying OPNFV compliance because it validates design patterns and support +for the types of NFVI features that users +care about. There are a lot of projects in OPNFV developing use cases +and sample VNFs, however most are still in early phase and require further +enhancements to become useful additions to the CVP. + +Many of these use case test cases do not add new API requirements to the SUT per se, but +exercise aspects of the SUT's functional capabilities in more complex ways. +Other use cases, such as SDNVPN, will require additional API level extension, +and to clearly separate the two, we will categorize the latter as +NFV specific functional requirements and not simply as use cases. + +Examples such as vIMS, or those which are not yet available +in Danube release e.g. vCPE, +will be valuable additions to the CVP. These use cases need to +be widely accepted, and since they are more complex, using these VNFs for CVP demands +higher level of community resources to implement, analyze and document these VNFs. + +Use case testing is not ready for CVP at the time of Danube, but can be incorporated +in Euphrates or as a future roadmap area. + +Finally, we take a preliminary look at future roadmap ideas that may be helpful +for the community to plan and pull resources around. + +8. Future CVP scope enhancements + +Some possible areas of enhancement for the CVP scope in subsequent releases include: + + - service assurance, as discussed above + - use case testing, as discussed above + - platform in-place upgrade + - API backward compatibility / micro-versioning + - workload migration + - multisite federation + - platform operational insights, e.g. telemetry, logging + - efficiency, e.g. hardware and energy footprint of the platform + - interoperability with workload automation platforms e.g. ONAP + +And enhancements may also be made to the existing test areas as well, +particularly those with limited coverage in this release. + +Summary of Test Scope +--------------------- + +The above analysis concludes with the following scope summarized below. +These tested areas represent significant advancement in the +direction to meet the CVP's objectives and end-user expectations, and is a +good basis for the initial phase of CVP. + +- Test Area: common cloud capabilities + - Openstack Refstack-compute test cases + Image, Identity, Compute, Network, Storage + - OPNFV-Functest/vPing, including both user data and ssh + - Port security and security groups + - VM lifecycle events + - VM networking + - VM resource scheduling + - Mandatory + +- Test Area: SDNVPN + - OPNFV-SDNVPN + - Optional + +- Test Area: IPv6 + - OPNFV-IPv6 + - Limited to overlay tests, v6Ping + - Optional + +- Test Area: High Availability + - OPNFV-HA + - OPNFV-Yardstick + - Limited to service continuity verification on control services + - Mandatory + +- Test Area: Resilency with Load + - OPNFV-Bottlenecks + - OPNFV-Yardstick + - Limited to compute resource load testing + - Optional + +Note 1: While the current scope of compliance includes functional verification +of certain performance-enhancing NFVI features, no performance measurements or +assessment of performance capabilities are included as of this release. + +Note 2: The SUT is limited to NFVI and VIM functions. While testing MANO +component capabilities is out of scope, certain APIs exposed towards MANO are +used by the current OPNFV compliance testing suite. MANO and other operational +elements may be part of the test infrastructure; for example used for workload +deployment and provisioning. + +Criteria for Awarding Compliance +================================ + +This section provides guidance on compliance criteia for each test area. The +criteria described here are high-level, detailed pass/fail metrics are +documented in Dovetail test specifications. + +1. All mandatory test cases must pass. + +Exceptions to this rule may be legitimate, e.g. due to imperfect test tools or +reasonable circumstances that we can not foresee. These exceptions must be +documented and accepted by the reviewers. + +2. Optional test cases are optional to run. Its test results, pass or fail, + do not impact compliance. + +Applicants who choose to run the optional test cases can include the results +of the optional test cases to highlight the additional compliance. + +References +========== + +[1] The OPNFV CVP Guidelines v.16 [Editor's note: link to be provided.] +[2] Pharos specification xxx [Editor's note: link to be provided.] + diff --git a/docs/testing/user/testspecification/dynamicnetwork/index.rst b/docs/testing/user/testspecification/dynamicnetwork/index.rst new file mode 100644 index 00000000..8fa084c7 --- /dev/null +++ b/docs/testing/user/testspecification/dynamicnetwork/index.rst @@ -0,0 +1,413 @@ +.. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. +.. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 +.. (c) Huawei Technologies Co.,Ltd + +===================================================== +Dynamic Network Runtime Operations test specification +===================================================== + +.. toctree:: + :maxdepth: 2 + +Scope +===== + +The dynamic network runtime operations test area evaluates the ability of the +system under test to support dynamic network runtime operations through the +life of a VNF (e.g. attach/detach, enable/disable, read stats). +The tests in this test area will evaluate IPv4 network runtime operations +functionality. These runtime operations includes hotpluging network interface, +detaching floating-ip from VM, attaching floating-ip to VM, updating subnet's +DNS, updating VM instance port admin state and updating router admin state. + +References +========== + +- DNS + + - https://docs.openstack.org/newton/networking-guide/config-dns-res.html + +Definitions and abbreviations +============================= + +The following terms and abbreviations are used in conjunction with this test +area + +- API - Application Programming Interface +- DNS - Domain Name System +- ICMP - Internet Control Message Protocol +- MAC - Media Access Control +- NIC - Network Interface Controller +- NFVi - Network Functions Virtualization infrastructure +- SSH - Secure Shell +- TCP - Transmission Control Protocol +- VIM - Virtual Infrastructure Manager +- VM - Virtual Machine + +System Under Test (SUT) +======================= + +The system under test is assumed to be the NFVi and VIM in operation on a +Pharos compliant infrastructure. + +Test Area Structure +=================== + +The test area is structured based on dynamic network runtime operations. Each +test case is able to run independently, i.e. irrelevant of the state created by +a previous test. Specifically, every test performs clean-up operations which +return the system to the same state as before the test. + +Test Descriptions +================= + +API Used and Reference +---------------------- + +Security Groups: https://developer.openstack.org/api-ref/network/v2/index.html#security-groups-security-groups + +- create security group +- delete security group + +Networks: https://developer.openstack.org/api-ref/networking/v2/index.html#networks + +- create network +- delete network + +Routers and interface: https://developer.openstack.org/api-ref/networking/v2/index.html#routers-routers + +- create router +- update router +- delete router +- add interface to router + +Subnets: https://developer.openstack.org/api-ref/networking/v2/index.html#subnets + +- create subnet +- update subnet +- delete subnet + +Servers: https://developer.openstack.org/api-ref/compute/ + +- create keypair +- create server +- delete server +- add/assign floating IP +- disassociate floating IP + +Ports: https://developer.openstack.org/api-ref/networking/v2/index.html#ports + +- create port +- update port +- delete port + +Floating IPs: https://developer.openstack.org/api-ref/networking/v2/index.html#floating-ips-floatingips + +- create floating IP +- delete floating IP + +-------------------------------------- +Test Case 1 - Basic network operations +-------------------------------------- + +Test case specification +----------------------- + +tempest.scenario.test_network_basic_ops.TestNetworkBasicOps.test_network_basic_ops + +Test preconditions +------------------ + +* Nova has been configured to boot VMs with Neutron-managed networking +* Openstack nova, neutron services are available +* One public network + +Basic test flow execution description and pass/fail criteria +------------------------------------------------------------ + +Test execution +'''''''''''''' + +* Test action 1: Create a security group SG1, which has rules for allowing + incoming SSH and ICMP traffic +* Test action 2: Create a neutron network NET1 +* Test action 3: Create a tenant router R1 which routes traffic to public network +* Test action 4: Create a subnet SUBNET1 and add it as router interface +* Test action 5: Create a server VM1 with SG1 and NET1, and assign a floating + IP FIP1 (via R1) to VM1 +* **Test assertion 1:** Ping FIP1 and SSH to VM1 via FIP1 successfully +* **Test assertion 2:** Ping the internal gateway from VM1 successfully +* **Test assertion 3:** Ping the default gateway from VM1 using its floating IP + FIP1 successfully +* Test action 6: Detach FIP1 from VM1 +* **Test assertion 4:** VM1 becomes unreachable after FIP1 disassociated +* Test action 7: Create a new server VM2 with NET1, and associate floating IP FIP1 to VM2 +* **Test assertion 5:** Ping FIP1 and SSH to VM2 via FIP1 successfully +* Test action 8: Delete SG1, NET1, SUBNET1, R1, VM1, VM2 and FIP1 + +Pass / fail criteria +'''''''''''''''''''' + +This test evaluates the functionality of basic network operations. +Specifically, the test verifies that: + +* The Tempest host can ping VM's IP address. This implies, but does not + guarantee (see the ssh check that follows), that the VM has been assigned the + correct IP address and has connectivity to the Tempest host. + +* The Tempest host can perform key-based authentication to an ssh server hosted + at VM's IP address. This check guarantees that the IP address is associated + with the target VM. + +* The Tempest host can ssh into the VM via the IP address and successfully ping + the internal gateway address, implying connectivity to another VM on the same network. + +* The Tempest host can ssh into the VM via the IP address and successfully ping + the default gateway, implying external connectivity. + +* Detach the floating-ip from the VM and VM becomes unreachable. + +* Associate attached floating ip to a new VM and the new VM is reachable. + +* Floating IP status is updated correctly after each change. + +In order to pass this test, all test assertions listed in the test execution above need to pass. + +Post conditions +--------------- + +N/A + +--------------------------------------- +Test Case 2 - Hotplug network interface +--------------------------------------- + +Test case specification +----------------------- + +tempest.scenario.test_network_basic_ops.TestNetworkBasicOps.test_hotplug_nic + +Test preconditions +------------------ + +* Nova has been configured to boot VMs with Neutron-managed networking +* Compute interface_attach feature is enabled +* VM vnic_type is not set to 'direct' or 'macvtap' +* Openstack nova, neutron services are available +* One public network + +Basic test flow execution description and pass/fail criteria +------------------------------------------------------------ + +Test execution +'''''''''''''' + +* Test action 1: Create a security group SG1, which has rules for allowing + incoming SSH and ICMP traffic +* Test action 2: Create a neutron network NET1 +* Test action 3: Create a tenant router R1 which routes traffic to public network +* Test action 4: Create a subnet SUBNET1 and add it as router interface +* Test action 5: Create a server VM1 with SG1 and NET1, and assign a floating + IP FIP1 (via R1) to VM1 +* **Test assertion 1:** Ping FIP1 and SSH to VM1 with FIP1 successfully +* Test action 6: Create a second neutron network NET2 and subnet SUBNET2, and + attach VM1 to NET2 +* Test action 7: Get VM1's ethernet interface NIC2 for NET2 +* **Test assertion 2:** Ping NET2's internal gateway successfully +* Test action 8: Delete SG1, NET1, NET2, SUBNET1, SUBNET2, R1, NIC2, VM1 and FIP1 + +Pass / fail criteria +'''''''''''''''''''' + +This test evaluates the functionality of adding network to an active VM. +Specifically, the test verifies that: + +* New network interface can be added to an existing VM successfully. + +* The Tempest host can ssh into the VM via the IP address and successfully ping + the new network's internal gateway address, implying connectivity to the new network. + +In order to pass this test, all test assertions listed in the test execution above need to pass. + +Post conditions +--------------- + +N/A + +------------------------------------------- +Test Case 3 - Update subnet's configuration +------------------------------------------- + +Test case specification +----------------------- + +tempest.scenario.test_network_basic_ops.TestNetworkBasicOps.test_subnet_details + +Test preconditions +------------------ + +* Nova has been configured to boot VMs with Neutron-managed networking +* DHCP client is available +* Tenant networks should be non-shared and isolated +* Openstack nova, neutron services are available +* One public network + +Basic test flow execution description and pass/fail criteria +------------------------------------------------------------ + +Test execution +'''''''''''''' + +* Test action 1: Create a security group SG1, which has rules for allowing + incoming SSH and ICMP traffic +* Test action 2: Create a neutron network NET1 +* Test action 3: Create a tenant router R1 which routes traffic to public network +* Test action 4: Create a subnet SUBNET1 and add it as router interface, + configure SUBNET1 with dns nameserver '1.2.3.4' +* Test action 5: Create a server VM1 with SG1 and NET1, and assign a floating + IP FIP1 (via R1) to VM1 +* **Test assertion 1:** Ping FIP1 and SSH to VM1 with FIP1 successfully +* **Test assertion 2:** Retrieve the VM1's configured dns and verify it matches + the one configured for SUBNET1 +* Test action 6: Update SUBNET1's dns to '9.8.7.6' +* **Test assertion 3:** After triggering the DHCP renew from the VM manually, + retrieve the VM1's configured dns and verify it has been successfully updated +* Test action 7: Delete SG1, NET1, SUBNET1, R1, VM1 and FIP1 + +Pass / fail criteria +'''''''''''''''''''' + +This test evaluates the functionality of updating subnet's configurations. +Specifically, the test verifies that: + +* Updating subnet's DNS server configurations are affecting the VMs. + +In order to pass this test, all test assertions listed in the test execution above need to pass. + +Post conditions +--------------- + +N/A + +---------------------------------------- +Test Case 4 - Update VM port admin state +---------------------------------------- + +Test case specification +----------------------- + +tempest.scenario.test_network_basic_ops.TestNetworkBasicOps.test_update_instance_port_admin_state + +Test preconditions +------------------ + +* Nova has been configured to boot VMs with Neutron-managed networking +* Network port_admin_state_change feature is enabled +* Openstack nova, neutron services are available +* One public network + +Basic test flow execution description and pass/fail criteria +------------------------------------------------------------ + +Test execution +'''''''''''''' + +* Test action 1: Create a security group SG1, which has rules for allowing + incoming SSH and ICMP traffic +* Test action 2: Create a neutron network NET1 +* Test action 3: Create a tenant router R1 which routes traffic to public network +* Test action 4: Create a subnet SUBNET1 and add it as router interface +* Test action 5: Create a server VM1 with SG1 and NET1, and assign a floating + IP FIP1 (via R1) to VM1 +* Test action 6: Create a server VM2 with SG1 and NET1, and assign a floating + IP FIP2 to VM2 +* Test action 7: Get a SSH client SSHCLNT1 to VM2 +* **Test assertion 1:** Ping FIP1 and SSH to VM1 with FIP1 successfully +* **Test assertion 2:** Ping FIP1 via SSHCLNT1 successfully +* Test action 8: Update admin_state_up attribute of VM1 port to False +* **Test assertion 3:** Ping FIP1 and SSH to VM1 with FIP1 failed +* **Test assertion 4:** Ping FIP1 via SSHCLNT1 failed +* Test action 9: Update admin_state_up attribute of VM1 port to True +* **Test assertion 5:** Ping FIP1 and SSH to VM1 with FIP1 successfully +* **Test assertion 6:** Ping FIP1 via SSHCLNT1 successfully +* Test action 10: Delete SG1, NET1, SUBNET1, R1, SSHCLNT1, VM1, VM2 and FIP1, FIP2 + +Pass / fail criteria +'''''''''''''''''''' + +This test evaluates the VM public and project connectivity status by changing VM port +admin_state_up to True & False. Specifically, the test verifies that: + +* Public and project connectivity is reachable before updating admin_state_up + attribute of VM port to False. + +* Public and project connectivity is unreachable after updating admin_state_up + attribute of VM port to False. + +* Public and project connectivity is reachable after updating admin_state_up + attribute of VM port from False to True. + +In order to pass this test, all test assertions listed in the test execution above need to pass. + +Post conditions +--------------- + +N/A + +--------------------------------------- +Test Case 5 - Update router admin state +--------------------------------------- + +Test case specification +----------------------- + +tempest.scenario.test_network_basic_ops.TestNetworkBasicOps.test_update_router_admin_state + +Test preconditions +------------------ + +* Nova has been configured to boot VMs with Neutron-managed networking +* Multi-tenant networks capabilities +* Openstack nova, neutron services are available +* One public network + +Basic test flow execution description and pass/fail criteria +------------------------------------------------------------ + +Test execution +'''''''''''''' + +* Test action 1: Create a security group SG1, which has rules for allowing + incoming SSH and ICMP traffic +* Test action 2: Create a neutron network NET1 +* Test action 3: Create a tenant router R1 which routes traffic to public network +* Test action 4: Create a subnet SUBNET1 and add it as router interface +* Test action 5: Create a server VM1 with SG1 and NET1, and assign a floating + IP FIP1 (via R1) to VM1 +* **Test assertion 1:** Ping FIP1 and SSH to VM1 with FIP1 successfully +* Test action 6: Update admin_state_up attribute of R1 to False +* **Test assertion 2:** Ping FIP1 and SSH to VM1 with FIP1 failed +* Test action 7: Update admin_state_up attribute of R1 to True +* **Test assertion 3:** Ping FIP1 and SSH to VM1 with FIP1 successfully +* Test action 8: Delete SG1, NET1, SUBNET1, R1, VM1 and FIP1 + +Pass / fail criteria +'''''''''''''''''''' + +This test evaluates the router public connectivity status by changing +router admin_state_up to True & False. +Specifically, the test verifies that: + +* Public connectivity is reachable before updating admin_state_up attribute of router to False. + +* Public connectivity is unreachable after updating admin_state_up attribute of router to False. + +* Public connectivity is reachable after updating admin_state_up attribute of router. + from False to True + +In order to pass this test, all test assertions listed in the test execution above need to pass. + +Post conditions +--------------- + +N/A diff --git a/docs/testing/user/testspecification/forwardingpackets/index.rst b/docs/testing/user/testspecification/forwardingpackets/index.rst new file mode 100644 index 00000000..ed2d55f0 --- /dev/null +++ b/docs/testing/user/testspecification/forwardingpackets/index.rst @@ -0,0 +1,145 @@ +.. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. +.. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 +.. (c) Huawei Technologies Co.,Ltd + +================================================== +Forwarding Packets in Data Path test specification +================================================== + +.. toctree:: + :maxdepth: 2 + +Scope +===== + +This test area evaluates the ability of the system under test to support basic packet forwarding. +The test in this test area will evaluate basic packet forwarding through virtual IPv4 networks +in data path, including creating server and verifying network connectivity to the created server +with ping operation using MTU sized packets. + +References +========== + +N/A + +Definitions and abbreviations +============================= + +The following terms and abbreviations are used in conjunction with this test +area + +- API - Application Programming Interface +- ICMP - Internet Control Message Protocol +- MTU - Maximum Transmission Unit +- NFVi - Network Functions Virtualization infrastructure +- SSH - Secure Shell +- VIM - Virtual Infrastructure Manager +- VM - Virtual Machine + +System Under Test (SUT) +======================= + +The system under test is assumed to be the NFVi and VIM in operation on a +Pharos compliant infrastructure. + +Test Area Structure +=================== + +The test area is structured based on the basic operations of forwarding packets +in data path through virtual networks. Specifically, the test performs +clean-up operations which return the system to the same state as before the test. + +Test Descriptions +================= + +API Used and Reference +---------------------- + +Security Groups: https://developer.openstack.org/api-ref/network/v2/index.html#security-groups-security-groups + +- create security group +- delete security group + +Networks: https://developer.openstack.org/api-ref/networking/v2/index.html#networks + +- create network +- delete network + +Routers and interface: https://developer.openstack.org/api-ref/networking/v2/index.html#routers-routers + +- create router +- delete router +- add interface to router + +Subnets: https://developer.openstack.org/api-ref/networking/v2/index.html#subnets + +- create subnet +- delete subnet + +Servers: https://developer.openstack.org/api-ref/compute/ + +- create keypair +- create server +- delete server +- add/assign floating ip + +Ports: https://developer.openstack.org/api-ref/networking/v2/index.html#ports + +- create port +- delete port + +Floating IPs: https://developer.openstack.org/api-ref/networking/v2/index.html#floating-ips-floatingips + +- create floating ip +- delete floating ip + +---------------------------- +MTU Sized Frames Fit Through +---------------------------- + +Test case specification +----------------------- + +tempest.scenario.test_network_basic_ops.TestNetworkBasicOps.test_mtu_sized_frames + +Test preconditions +------------------ + +* Nova has been configured to boot VMs with Neutron-managed networking +* Neutron net-mtu extension API +* One public network + +Basic test flow execution description and pass/fail criteria +------------------------------------------------------------ + +Test execution +'''''''''''''' + +* Test action 1: Create a security group SG1, which has rules for allowing + incoming and outgoing SSH and ICMP traffic +* Test action 2: Create a neutron network NET1 +* Test action 3: Create a tenant router R1 which routes traffic to public network +* Test action 4: Create a subnet SUBNET1 and add it as router interface +* Test action 5: Create a server VM1 with SG1 and NET1, and assign a floating + ip FIP1 (via R1) to VM1 +* Test action 6: Set MTU size to be the default MTU size of the SUT's network +* Test action 7: Host sends MTU sized ICMP packets to VM1 using ``ping`` +* **Test assertion 1:** Ping FIP1 using MTU sized packets successfully +* Test action 8: SSH to VM1 with FIP1 +* **Test assertion 2:** SSH to VM1 with FIP1 successfully +* Test action 9: Delete SG1, NET1, SUBNET1, R1, VM1 and FIP1 + +Pass / fail criteria +'''''''''''''''''''' + +This test evaluates the network connectivity using MTU sized frames. +Specifically, the test verifies that: + +* With Neutron net-mtu extension configured, MTU sized packets can fit through network. + +In order to pass this test, all test assertions listed in the test execution above need to pass. + +Post conditions +--------------- + +N/A diff --git a/docs/testing/user/testspecification/highavailability/index.rst b/docs/testing/user/testspecification/highavailability/index.rst index e69de29b..715f84d0 100644 --- a/docs/testing/user/testspecification/highavailability/index.rst +++ b/docs/testing/user/testspecification/highavailability/index.rst @@ -0,0 +1,743 @@ +.. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International +.. License. +.. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 +.. (c) OPNFV, China Mobile and others. + +========================================== +OpenStack Services HA test specification +========================================== + +.. toctree:: +:maxdepth: + +Scope +===== + +The HA test area evaluates the ability of the System Under Test to support service +continuity and recovery from component failures on part of OpenStack controller services("nova-api", +"neutron-server", "keystone", "glance-api", "cinder-api") and on "load balancer" service. + +The tests in this test area will emulate component failures by killing the +processes of above target services, stressing the CPU load or blocking +disk I/O on the selected controller node, and then check if the impacted +services are still available and the killed processes are recovered on the +selected controller node within a given time interval. + + +References +================ + +This test area references the following specifications: + +- ETSI GS NFV-REL 001 + + - http://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_gs/NFV-REL/001_099/001/01.01.01_60/gs_nfv-rel001v010101p.pdf + +- OpenStack High Availability Guide + + - https://docs.openstack.org/ha-guide/ + + +Definitions and abbreviations +============================= + +The following terms and abbreviations are used in conjunction with this test area + +- SUT - system under test +- Monitor - tools used to measure the service outage time and the process + outage time +- Service outage time - the outage time (seconds) of the specific OpenStack + service +- Process outage time - the outage time (seconds) from the specific processes + being killed to recovered + + +System Under Test (SUT) +======================= + +The system under test is assumed to be the NFVi and VIM in operation on a +Pharos compliant infrastructure. + +SUT is assumed to be in high availability configuration, which typically means +more than one controller nodes are in the System Under Test. + +Test Area Structure +==================== + +The HA test area is structured with the following test cases in a sequential +manner. + +Each test case is able to run independently. Preceding test case's failure will +not affect the subsequent test cases. + +Preconditions of each test case will be described in the following test +descriptions. + + +Test Descriptions +================= + +--------------------------------------------------------------- +Test Case 1 - Controller node OpenStack service down - nova-api +--------------------------------------------------------------- + +Short name +---------- + +opnfv.ha.tc001.nova-api_service_down + +Use case specification +---------------------- + +This test case verifies the service continuity capability in the face of the +software process failure. It kills the processes of OpenStack "nova-api" +service on the selected controller node, then checks whether the "nova-api" +service is still available during the failure, by creating a VM then deleting +the VM, and checks whether the killed processes are recovered within a given +time interval. + + +Test preconditions +------------------ + +There is more than one controller node, which is providing the "nova-api" +service for API end-point. +Denoted a controller node as Node1 in the following configuration. + + +Basic test flow execution description and pass/fail criteria +------------------------------------------------------------ + +Methodology for verifying service continuity and recovery +''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' + +The service continuity and process recovery capabilities of "nova-api" service +is evaluated by monitoring service outage time, process outage time, and results +of nova operations. + +Service outage time is measured by continuously executing "openstack server list" +command in loop and checking if the response of the command request is returned +with no failure. +When the response fails, the "nova-api" service is considered in outage. +The time between the first response failure and the last response failure is +considered as service outage time. + +Process outage time is measured by checking the status of "nova-api" processes on +the selected controller node. The time of "nova-api" processes being killed to +the time of the "nova-api" processes being recovered is the process outage time. +Process recovery is verified by checking the existence of "nova-api" processes. + +All nova operations are carried out correctly within a given time interval which +suggests that the "nova-api" service is continuously available. + +Test execution +'''''''''''''' +* Test action 1: Connect to Node1 through SSH, and check that "nova-api" + processes are running on Node1 +* Test action 2: Create a image with "openstack image create test-cirros + --file cirros-0.3.5-x86_64-disk.img --disk-format qcow2 --container-format bare" +* Test action 3: Execute"openstack flavor create m1.test --id auto --ram 512 + --disk 1 --vcpus 1" to create flavor "m1.test". +* Test action 4: Start two monitors: one for "nova-api" processes and the other + for "openstack server list" command. + Each monitor will run as an independent process +* Test action 5: Connect to Node1 through SSH, and then kill the "nova-api" + processes +* Test action 6: When "openstack server list" returns with no error, calculate + the service outage time, and execute command "openstack server create + --flavor m1.test --image test-cirros test-instance" +* Test action 7: Continuously Execute "openstack server show test-instance" + to check if the status of VM "test-instance" is "Active" +* Test action 8: If VM "test-instance" is "Active", execute "openstack server + delete test-instance", then execute "openstack server list" to check if the + VM is not in the list +* Test action 9: Continuously measure process outage time from the monitor until + the process outage time is more than 30s + +Pass / fail criteria +'''''''''''''''''''' + +The process outage time is less than 30s. + +The service outage time is less than 5s. + +The nova operations are carried out in above order and no errors occur. + +A negative result will be generated if the above is not met in completion. + +Post conditions +--------------- + +Restart the process of "nova-api" if they are not running. +Delete image with "openstack image delete test-cirros" +Delete flavor with "openstack flavor delete m1.test" + + +--------------------------------------------------------------------- +Test Case 2 - Controller node OpenStack service down - neutron-server +--------------------------------------------------------------------- + +Short name +---------- + +opnfv.ha.tc002.neutron-server_service_down + +Use case specification +---------------------- + +This test verifies the high availability of the "neutron-server" service +provided by OpenStack controller nodes. It kills the processes of OpenStack +"neutron-server" service on the selected controller node, then checks whether +the "neutron-server" service is still available, by creating a network and +deleting the network, and checks whether the killed processes are recovered. + +Test preconditions +------------------ + +There is more than one controller node, which is providing the "neutron-server" +service for API end-point. +Denoted a controller node as Node1 in the following configuration. + +Basic test flow execution description and pass/fail criteria +------------------------------------------------------------ + +Methodology for monitoring high availability +'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' + +The high availability of "neutron-server" service is evaluated by monitoring +service outage time, process outage time, and results of neutron operations. + +Service outage time is tested by continuously executing "openstack router list" +command in loop and checking if the response of the command request is returned +with no failure. +When the response fails, the "neutron-server" service is considered in outage. +The time between the first response failure and the last response failure is +considered as service outage time. + +Process outage time is tested by checking the status of "neutron-server" +processes on the selected controller node. The time of "neutron-server" +processes being killed to the time of the "neutron-server" processes being +recovered is the process outage time. Process recovery is verified by checking +the existence of "neutron-server" processes. + +Test execution +'''''''''''''' + +* Test action 1: Connect to Node1 through SSH, and check that "neutron-server" + processes are running on Node1 +* Test action 2: Start two monitors: one for "neutron-server" process and the + other for "openstack router list" command. + Each monitor will run as an independent process. +* Test action 3: Connect to Node1 through SSH, and then kill the + "neutron-server" processes +* Test action 4: When "openstack router list" returns with no error, calculate + the service outage time, and execute "openstack network create test-network" +* Test action 5: Continuously executing "openstack network show test-network", + check if the status of "test-network" is "Active" +* Test action 6: If "test-network" is "Active", execute "openstack network + delete test-network", then execute "openstack network list" to check if the + "test-network" is not in the list +* Test action 7: Continuously measure process outage time from the monitor until + the process outage time is more than 30s + +Pass / fail criteria +'''''''''''''''''''' + +The process outage time is less than 30s. + +The service outage time is less than 5s. + +The neutron operations are carried out in above order and no errors occur. + +A negative result will be generated if the above is not met in completion. + +Post conditions +--------------- + +Restart the processes of "neutron-server" if they are not running. + + +--------------------------------------------------------------- +Test Case 3 - Controller node OpenStack service down - keystone +--------------------------------------------------------------- + +Short name +---------- + +opnfv.ha.tc003.keystone_service_down + +Use case specification +---------------------- + +This test verifies the high availability of the "keystone" service provided by +OpenStack controller nodes. It kills the processes of OpenStack "keystone" +service on the selected controller node, then checks whether the "keystone" +service is still available by executing command "openstack user list" and +whether the killed processes are recovered. + +Test preconditions +------------------ + +There is more than one controller node, which is providing the "keystone" +service for API end-point. +Denoted a controller node as Node1 in the following configuration. + +Basic test flow execution description and pass/fail criteria +------------------------------------------------------------ + +Methodology for monitoring high availability +'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' + +The high availability of "keystone" service is evaluated by monitoring service +outage time and process outage time + +Service outage time is tested by continuously executing "openstack user list" +command in loop and checking if the response of the command request is reutrned +with no failure. +When the response fails, the "keystone" service is considered in outage. +The time between the first response failure and the last response failure is +considered as service outage time. + +Process outage time is tested by checking the status of "keystone" processes on +the selected controller node. The time of "keystone" processes being killed to +the time of the "keystone" processes being recovered is the process outage +time. Process recovery is verified by checking the existence of "keystone" +processes. + +Test execution +'''''''''''''' + +* Test action 1: Connect to Node1 through SSH, and check that "keystone" + processes are running on Node1 +* Test action 2: Start two monitors: one for "keystone" process and the other + for "openstack user list" command. + Each monitor will run as an independent process. +* Test action 3: Connect to Node1 through SSH, and then kill the "keystone" + processes +* Test action 4: Calculate the service outage time and process outage time +* Test action 5: The test passes if process outage time is less than 20s and + service outage time is less than 5s +* Test action 6: Continuously measure process outage time from the monitor until + the process outage time is more than 30s + +Pass / fail criteria +'''''''''''''''''''' + +The process outage time is less than 30s. + +The service outage time is less than 5s. + +A negative result will be generated if the above is not met in completion. + +Post conditions +--------------- + +Restart the processes of "keystone" if they are not running. + + +----------------------------------------------------------------- +Test Case 4 - Controller node OpenStack service down - glance-api +----------------------------------------------------------------- + +Short name +---------- + +opnfv.ha.tc004.glance-api_service_down + +Use case specification +---------------------- + +This test verifies the high availability of the "glance-api" service provided +by OpenStack controller nodes. It kills the processes of OpenStack "glance-api" +service on the selected controller node, then checks whether the "glance-api" +service is still available, by creating image and deleting image, and checks +whether the killed processes are recovered. + +Test preconditions +------------------ + +There is more than one controller node, which is providing the "glance-api" +service for API end-point. +Denoted a controller node as Node1 in the following configuration. + + +Basic test flow execution description and pass/fail criteria +------------------------------------------------------------ + +Methodology for monitoring high availability +'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' + +The high availability of "glance-api" service is evaluated by monitoring +service outage time, process outage time, and results of glance operations. + +Service outage time is tested by continuously executing "openstack image list" +command in loop and checking if the response of the command request is returned +with no failure. +When the response fails, the "glance-api" service is considered in outage. +The time between the first response failure and the last response failure is +considered as service outage time. + +Process outage time is tested by checking the status of "glance-api" processes +on the selected controller node. The time of "glance-api" processes being +killed to the time of the "glance-api" processes being recovered is the process +outage time. Process recovery is verified by checking the existence of +"glance-api" processes. + +Test execution +'''''''''''''' + +* Test action 1: Connect to Node1 through SSH, and check that "glance-api" + processes are running on Node1 +* Test action 2: Start two monitors: one for "glance-api" process and the other + for "openstack image list" command. + Each monitor will run as an independent process. +* Test action 3: Connect to Node1 through SSH, and then kill the "glance-api" + processes +* Test action 4: When "openstack image list" returns with no error, calculate + the service outage time, and execute "openstack image create test-image + --file cirros-0.3.5-x86_64-disk.img --disk-format qcow2 --container-format bare" +* Test action 5: Continuously execute "openstack image show test-image", check + if status of "test-image" is "active" +* Test action 6: If "test-image" is "active", execute "openstack image delete + test-image". Then execute "openstack image list" to check if "test-image" is + not in the list +* Test action 7: Continuously measure process outage time from the monitor until + the process outage time is more than 30s + +Pass / fail criteria +'''''''''''''''''''' + +The process outage time is less than 30s. + +The service outage time is less than 5s. + +The glance operations are carried out in above order and no errors occur. + +A negative result will be generated if the above is not met in completion. + +Post conditions +--------------- + +Restart the processes of "glance-api" if they are not running. + +Delete image with "openstack image delete test-image". + + +----------------------------------------------------------------- +Test Case 5 - Controller node OpenStack service down - cinder-api +----------------------------------------------------------------- + +Short name +---------- + +opnfv.ha.tc005.cinder-api_service_down + +Use case specification +---------------------- + +This test verifies the high availability of the "cinder-api" service provided +by OpenStack controller nodes. It kills the processes of OpenStack "cinder-api" +service on the selected controller node, then checks whether the "cinder-api" +service is still available by executing command "openstack volume list" and +whether the killed processes are recovered. + +Test preconditions +------------------ + +There is more than one controller node, which is providing the "cinder-api" +service for API end-point. +Denoted a controller node as Node1 in the following configuration. + +Basic test flow execution description and pass/fail criteria +------------------------------------------------------------ + +Methodology for monitoring high availability +'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' + +The high availability of "cinder-api" service is evaluated by monitoring +service outage time and process outage time + +Service outage time is tested by continuously executing "openstack volume list" +command in loop and checking if the response of the command request is returned +with no failure. +When the response fails, the "cinder-api" service is considered in outage. +The time between the first response failure and the last response failure is +considered as service outage time. + +Process outage time is tested by checking the status of "cinder-api" processes +on the selected controller node. The time of "cinder-api" processes being +killed to the time of the "cinder-api" processes being recovered is the process +outage time. Process recovery is verified by checking the existence of +"cinder-api" processes. + +Test execution +'''''''''''''' + +* Test action 1: Connect to Node1 through SSH, and check that "cinder-api" + processes are running on Node1 +* Test action 2: Start two monitors: one for "cinder-api" process and the other + for "openstack volume list" command. + Each monitor will run as an independent process. +* Test action 3: Connect to Node1 through SSH, and then execute kill the + "cinder-api" processes +* Test action 4: Continuously measure service outage time from the monitor until + the service outage time is more than 5s +* Test action 5: Continuously measure process outage time from the monitor until + the process outage time is more than 30s + +Pass / fail criteria +'''''''''''''''''''' + +The process outage time is less than 30s. + +The service outage time is less than 5s. + +The cinder operations are carried out in above order and no errors occur. + +A negative result will be generated if the above is not met in completion. + +Post conditions +--------------- + +Restart the processes of "cinder-api" if they are not running. + + +------------------------------------------------------------ +Test Case 6 - Controller Node CPU Overload High Availability +------------------------------------------------------------ + +Short name +---------- + +opnfv.ha.tc006.cpu_overload + +Use case specification +---------------------- + +This test verifies the availability of services when one of the controller node +suffers from heavy CPU overload. When the CPU usage of the specified controller +node is up to 100%, which breaks down the OpenStack services on this node, +the Openstack services should continue to be available. This test case stresses +the CPU usage of a specific controller node to 100%, then checks whether all +services provided by the SUT are still available with the monitor tools. + +Test preconditions +------------------ + +There is more than one controller node, which is providing the "cinder-api", +"neutron-server", "glance-api" and "keystone" services for API end-point. +Denoted a controller node as Node1 in the following configuration. + +Basic test flow execution description and pass/fail criteria +------------------------------------------------------------ + +Methodology for monitoring high availability +'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' + +The high availability of related OpenStack service is evaluated by monitoring service +outage time + +Service outage time is tested by continuously executing "openstack router list", +"openstack stack list", "openstack volume list", "openstack image list" commands +in loop and checking if the response of the command request is returned with no +failure. +When the response fails, the related service is considered in outage. The time +between the first response failure and the last response failure is considered +as service outage time. + + +Methodology for stressing CPU usage +''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' + +To evaluate the high availability of target OpenStack service under heavy CPU +load, the test case will first get the number of logical CPU cores on the +target controller node by shell command, then use the number to execute 'dd' +command to continuously copy from /dev/zero and output to /dev/null in loop. +The 'dd' operation only uses CPU, no I/O operation, which is ideal for +stressing the CPU usage. + +Since the 'dd' command is continuously executed and the CPU usage rate is +stressed to 100%, the scheduler will schedule each 'dd' command to be +processed on a different logical CPU core. Eventually to achieve all logical +CPU cores usage rate to 100%. + +Test execution +'''''''''''''' + +* Test action 1: Start four monitors: one for "openstack image list" command, + one for "openstack router list" command, one for "openstack stack list" + command and the last one for "openstack volume list" command. Each monitor + will run as an independent process. +* Test action 2: Connect to Node1 through SSH, and then stress all logical CPU + cores usage rate to 100% +* Test action 3: Continuously measure all the service outage times until they are + more than 5s +* Test action 4: Kill the process that stresses the CPU usage + +Pass / fail criteria +'''''''''''''''''''' + +All the service outage times are less than 5s. + +A negative result will be generated if the above is not met in completion. + +Post conditions +--------------- + +No impact on the SUT. + + +----------------------------------------------------------------- +Test Case 7 - Controller Node Disk I/O Overload High Availability +----------------------------------------------------------------- + +Short name +---------- + +opnfv.ha.tc007.disk_I/O_overload + +Use case specification +---------------------- + +This test verifies the high availability of control node. When the disk I/O of +the specific disk is overload, which breaks down the OpenStack services on this +node, the read and write services should continue to be available. This test +case blocks the disk I/O of the specific controller node, then checks whether +the services that need to read or write the disk of the controller node are +available with some monitor tools. + +Test preconditions +------------------ + +There is more than one controller node. +Denoted a controller node as Node1 in the following configuration. +The controller node has at least 20GB free disk space. + +Basic test flow execution description and pass/fail criteria +------------------------------------------------------------ + +Methodology for monitoring high availability +'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' + +The high availability of nova service is evaluated by monitoring +service outage time + +Service availability is tested by continuously executing +"openstack flavor list" command in loop and checking if the response of the +command request is returned with no failure. +When the response fails, the related service is considered in outage. + + +Methodology for stressing disk I/O +'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' + +To evaluate the high availability of target OpenStack service under heavy I/O +load, the test case will execute shell command on the selected controller node +to continuously writing 8kb blocks to /test.dbf + +Test execution +'''''''''''''' + +* Test action 1: Connect to Node1 through SSH, and then stress disk I/O by + continuously writing 8kb blocks to /test.dbf +* Test action 2: Start a monitor: for "openstack flavor list" command +* Test action 3: Create a flavor called "test-001" +* Test action 4: Check whether the flavor "test-001" is created +* Test action 5: Continuously measure service outage time from the monitor + until the service outage time is more than 5s +* Test action 6: Stop writing to /test.dbf and delete file /test.dbf + +Pass / fail criteria +'''''''''''''''''''' + +The service outage time is less than 5s. + +The nova operations are carried out in above order and no errors occur. + +A negative result will be generated if the above is not met in completion. + +Post conditions +--------------- + +Delete flavor with "openstack flavor delete test-001". + +-------------------------------------------------------------------- +Test Case 8 - Controller Load Balance as a Service High Availability +-------------------------------------------------------------------- + +Short name +---------- + +opnfv.ha.tc008.load_balance_service_down + +Use case specification +---------------------- + +This test verifies the high availability of "load balancer" service. When +the "load balancer" service of a specified controller node is killed, whether +"load balancer" service on other controller nodes will work, and whether the +controller node will restart the "load balancer" service are checked. This +test case kills the processes of "load balancer" service on the selected +controller node, then checks whether the request of the related OpenStack +command is processed with no failure and whether the killed processes are +recovered. + +Test preconditions +------------------ + +There is more than one controller node, which is providing the "load balancer" +service for rest-api. Denoted as Node1 in the following configuration. + +Basic test flow execution description and pass/fail criteria +------------------------------------------------------------ + +Methodology for monitoring high availability +'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' + +The high availability of "load balancer" service is evaluated by monitoring +service outage time and process outage time + +Service outage time is tested by continuously executing "openstack image list" +command in loop and checking if the response of the command request is returned +with no failure. +When the response fails, the "load balancer" service is considered in outage. +The time between the first response failure and the last response failure is +considered as service outage time. + +Process outage time is tested by checking the status of processes of "load +balancer" service on the selected controller node. The time of those processes +being killed to the time of those processes being recovered is the process +outage time. +Process recovery is verified by checking the existence of processes of "load +balancer" service. + +Test execution +'''''''''''''' + +* Test action 1: Connect to Node1 through SSH, and check that processes of + "load balancer" service are running on Node1 +* Test action 2: Start two monitors: one for processes of "load balancer" + service and the other for "openstack image list" command. Each monitor will + run as an independent process +* Test action 3: Connect to Node1 through SSH, and then kill the processes of + "load balancer" service +* Test action 4: Continuously measure service outage time from the monitor until + the service outage time is more than 5s +* Test action 5: Continuously measure process outage time from the monitor until + the process outage time is more than 30s + +Pass / fail criteria +'''''''''''''''''''' + +The process outage time is less than 30s. + +The service outage time is less than 5s. + +A negative result will be generated if the above is not met in completion. + +Post conditions +--------------- +Restart the processes of "load balancer" if they are not running. + + + diff --git a/docs/testing/user/testspecification/ipv6/index.rst b/docs/testing/user/testspecification/ipv6/index.rst new file mode 100644 index 00000000..c3dc844b --- /dev/null +++ b/docs/testing/user/testspecification/ipv6/index.rst @@ -0,0 +1,1787 @@ +.. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. +.. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 +.. (c) OPNFV + +======================== +IPv6 test specification +======================== + +.. toctree:: + :maxdepth: 2 + +Scope +===== + +The IPv6 test area will evaluate the ability for a SUT to support IPv6 +Tenant Network features and functionality. The tests in this test area will +evaluate, + +- network, subnet, port, router API CRUD operations +- interface add and remove operations +- security group and security group rule API CRUD operations +- IPv6 address assignment with dual stack, dual net, multiprefix in mode DHCPv6 stateless or SLAAC + +References +================ + +- upstream openstack API reference + + - http://developer.openstack.org/api-ref + +- upstream openstack IPv6 reference + + - https://docs.openstack.org/newton/networking-guide/config-ipv6.html + +Definitions and abbreviations +============================= + +The following terms and abbreviations are used in conjunction with this test area + +- API - Application Programming Interface +- CIDR - Classless Inter-Domain Routing +- CRUD - Create, Read, Update, and Delete +- DHCP - Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol +- DHCPv6 - Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol version 6 +- ICMP - Internet Control Message Protocol +- NFVI - Network Functions Virtualization Infrastructure +- NIC - Network Interface Controller +- RA - Router Advertisements +- radvd - The Router Advertisement Daemon +- SDN - Software Defined Network +- SLAAC - Stateless Address Auto Configuration +- TCP - Transmission Control Protocol +- UDP - User Datagram Protocol +- VM - Virtual Machine +- vNIC - virtual Network Interface Card + +System Under Test (SUT) +======================= + +The system under test is assumed to be the NFVI and VIM deployed with a Pharos compliant infrastructure. + +Test Area Structure +==================== + +The test area is structured based on network, port and subnet operations. Each test case +is able to run independently, i.e. irrelevant of the state created by a previous test. + +Test Descriptions +================= + +API Used and Reference +---------------------- + +Networks: https://developer.openstack.org/api-ref/networking/v2/index.html#networks + +- show network details +- update network +- delete network +- list networks +- create netowrk +- bulk create networks + +Subnets: https://developer.openstack.org/api-ref/networking/v2/index.html#subnets + +- list subnets +- create subnet +- bulk create subnet +- show subnet details +- update subnet +- delete subnet + +Routers and interface: https://developer.openstack.org/api-ref/networking/v2/index.html#routers-routers + +- list routers +- create router +- show router details +- update router +- delete router +- add interface to router +- remove interface from router + +Ports: https://developer.openstack.org/api-ref/networking/v2/index.html#ports + +- show port details +- update port +- delete port +- list port +- create port +- bulk create ports + +Security groups: https://developer.openstack.org/api-ref/networking/v2/index.html#security-groups-security-groups + +- list security groups +- create security groups +- show security group +- update security group +- delete security group + +Security groups rules: https://developer.openstack.org/api-ref/networking/v2/index.html#security-group-rules-security-group-rules + +- list security group rules +- create security group rule +- show security group rule +- delete security group rule + +Servers: https://developer.openstack.org/api-ref/compute/ + +- list servers +- create server +- create multiple servers +- list servers detailed +- show server details +- update server +- delete server + +------------------------------------------------------------------ +Test Case 1 - Create and Delete Bulk Network, IPv6 Subnet and Port +------------------------------------------------------------------ + +Short name +---------- + +opnfv.ipv6.bulk_network_subnet_port_create_delete + +Use case specification +---------------------- + +This test case evaluates the SUT API ability of creating and deleting multiple networks, +IPv6 subnets, ports in one request, the reference is, + +tempest.api.network.test_networks.BulkNetworkOpsIpV6Test.test_bulk_create_delete_network +tempest.api.network.test_networks.BulkNetworkOpsIpV6Test.test_bulk_create_delete_subnet +tempest.api.network.test_networks.BulkNetworkOpsIpV6Test.test_bulk_create_delete_port + +Test preconditions +------------------ + +None + +Basic test flow execution description and pass/fail criteria +------------------------------------------------------------ + +Test execution +''''''''''''''' + +* Test action 1: Create 2 networks using bulk create, storing the "id" parameters returned in the response +* Test action 2: List all networks, verifying the two network id's are found in the list +* **Test assertion 1:** The two "id" parameters are found in the network list +* Test action 3: Delete the 2 created networks using the stored network ids +* Test action 4: List all networks, verifying the network ids are no longer present +* **Test assertion 2:** The two "id" parameters are not present in the network list +* Test action 5: Create 2 networks using bulk create, storing the "id" parameters returned in the response +* Test action 6: Create an IPv6 subnets on each of the two networks using bulk create commands, + storing the associated "id" parameters +* Test action 7: List all subnets, verify the IPv6 subnets are found in the list +* **Test assertion 3:** The two IPv6 subnet "id" parameters are found in the network list +* Test action 8: Delete the 2 IPv6 subnets using the stored "id" parameters +* Test action 9: List all subnets, verify the IPv6 subnets are no longer present in the list +* **Test assertion 4:** The two IPv6 subnet "id" parameters, are not present in list +* Test action 10: Delete the 2 networks created in test action 5, using the stored network ids +* Test action 11: List all networks, verifying the network ids are no longer present +* **Test assertion 5:** The two "id" parameters are not present in the network list +* Test action 12: Create 2 networks using bulk create, storing the "id" parameters returned in the response +* Test action 13: Create a port on each of the two networks using bulk create commands, + storing the associated "port_id" parameters +* Test action 14: List all ports, verify the port_ids are found in the list +* **Test assertion 6:** The two "port_id" parameters are found in the ports list +* Test action 15: Delete the 2 ports using the stored "port_id" parameters +* Test action 16: List all ports, verify port_ids are no longer present in the list +* **Test assertion 7:** The two "port_id" parameters, are not present in list +* Test action 17: Delete the 2 networks created in test action 12, using the stored network ids +* Test action 18: List all networks, verifying the network ids are no longer present +* **Test assertion 8:** The two "id" parameters are not present in the network list + +Pass / fail criteria +''''''''''''''''''''' + +This test evaluates the ability to use bulk create commands to create networks, IPv6 subnets and ports on +the SUT API. Specifically it verifies that: + +* Bulk network create commands return valid "id" parameters which are reported in the list commands +* Bulk IPv6 subnet commands return valid "id" parameters which are reported in the list commands +* Bulk port commands return valid "port_id" parameters which are reported in the list commands +* All items created using bulk create commands are able to be removed using the returned identifiers + +Post conditions +--------------- + +N/A + +------------------------------------------------------------------- +Test Case 2 - Create, Update and Delete an IPv6 Network and Subnet +------------------------------------------------------------------- + +Short name +----------- + +opnfv.ipv6.network_subnet_create_update_delete + +Use case specification +---------------------- + +This test case evaluates the SUT API ability of creating, updating, deleting +network and IPv6 subnet with the network, the reference is + +tempest.api.network.test_networks.NetworksIpV6Test.test_create_update_delete_network_subnet + +Test preconditions +------------------ + +None + +Basic test flow execution description and pass/fail criteria +------------------------------------------------------------ + +Test execution +''''''''''''''' + +* Test action 1: Create a network, storing the "id" and "status" parameters returned + in the response +* Test action 2: Verify the value of the created network's "status" is ACTIVE +* **Test assertion 1:** The created network's "status" is ACTIVE +* Test action 3: Update this network with a new_name +* Test action 4: Verify the network's name equals the new_name +* **Test assertion 2:** The network's name equals to the new_name after name updating +* Test action 5: Create an IPv6 subnet within the network, storing the "id" parameters + returned in the response +* Test action 6: Update this IPv6 subnet with a new_name +* Test action 7: Verify the IPv6 subnet's name equals the new_name +* **Test assertion 3:** The IPv6 subnet's name equals to the new_name after name updating +* Test action 8: Delete the IPv6 subnet created in test action 5, using the stored subnet id +* Test action 9: List all subnets, verifying the subnet id is no longer present +* **Test assertion 4:** The IPv6 subnet "id" is not present in the subnet list +* Test action 10: Delete the network created in test action 1, using the stored network id +* Test action 11: List all networks, verifying the network id is no longer present +* **Test assertion 5:** The network "id" is not present in the network list + + +Pass / fail criteria +''''''''''''''''''''' + +This test evaluates the ability to create, update, delete network, IPv6 subnet on the +SUT API. Specifically it verifies that: + +* Create network commands return ACTIVE "status" parameters which are reported in the list commands +* Update network commands return updated "name" parameters which equals to the "name" used +* Update subnet commands return updated "name" parameters which equals to the "name" used +* All items created using create commands are able to be removed using the returned identifiers + +Post conditions +--------------- + +None + +------------------------------------------------- +Test Case 3 - Check External Network Visibility +------------------------------------------------- + +Short name +----------- + +opnfv.ipv6.external_network_visibility + +Use case specification +---------------------- + +This test case verifies user can see external networks but not subnets, the reference is, + +tempest.api.network.test_networks.NetworksIpV6Test.test_external_network_visibility + +Test preconditions +------------------ + +1. The SUT has at least one external network. +2. In the external network list, there is no network without external router, i.e., +all networks in this list are with external router. +3. There is one external network with configured public network id and there is +no subnet on this network + +Basic test flow execution description and pass/fail criteria +------------------------------------------------------------ + +Test execution +''''''''''''''' + +* Test action 1: List all networks with external router, storing the "id"s parameters returned in the response +* Test action 2: Verify list in test action 1 is not empty +* **Test assertion 1:** The network with external router list is not empty +* Test action 3: List all netowrks without external router in test action 1 list +* Test action 4: Verify list in test action 3 is empty +* **Test assertion 2:** networks without external router in the external network + list is empty +* Test action 5: Verify the configured public network id is found in test action 1 stored "id"s +* **Test assertion 3:** the public network id is found in the external network "id"s +* Test action 6: List the subnets of the external network with the configured + public network id +* Test action 7: Verify list in test action 6 is empty +* **Test assertion 4:** There is no subnet of the external network with the configured + public network id + +Pass / fail criteria +''''''''''''''''''''' + +This test evaluates the ability to use list commands to list external networks, pre-configured +public network. Specifically it verifies that: + +* Network list commands to find visible networks with external router +* Network list commands to find visible network with pre-configured public network id +* Subnet list commands to find no subnet on the pre-configured public network + +Post conditions +--------------- + +None + +--------------------------------------------- +Test Case 4 - List IPv6 Networks and Subnets +--------------------------------------------- + +Short name +----------- + +opnfv.ipv6.network_subnet_list + +Use case specification +---------------------- + +This test case evaluates the SUT API ability of listing netowrks, +subnets after creating a network and an IPv6 subnet, the reference is + +tempest.api.network.test_networks.NetworksIpV6Test.test_list_networks +tempest.api.network.test_networks.NetworksIpV6Test.test_list_subnets + +Test preconditions +------------------ + +None + +Basic test flow execution description and pass/fail criteria +------------------------------------------------------------ + +Test execution +''''''''''''''' + +* Test action 1: Create a network, storing the "id" parameter returned in the response +* Test action 2: List all networks, verifying the network id is found in the list +* **Test assertion 1:** The "id" parameter is found in the network list +* Test action 3: Create an IPv6 subnet of the network created in test action 1. + storing the "id" parameter returned in the response +* Test action 4: List all subnets of this network, verifying the IPv6 subnet id + is found in the list +* **Test assertion 2:** The "id" parameter is found in the IPv6 subnet list +* Test action 5: Delete the IPv6 subnet using the stored "id" parameters +* Test action 6: List all subnets, verify subnet_id is no longer present in the list +* **Test assertion 3:** The IPv6 subnet "id" parameter is not present in list +* Test action 7: Delete the network created in test action 1, using the stored network ids +* Test action 8: List all networks, verifying the network id is no longer present +* **Test assertion 4:** The network "id" parameter is not present in the network list + +Pass / fail criteria +'''''''''''''''''''' + +This test evaluates the ability to use create commands to create network, IPv6 subnet, list +commands to list the created networks, IPv6 subnet on the SUT API. Specifically it verifies that: + +* Create commands to create network, IPv6 subnet +* List commands to find that netowrk, IPv6 subnet in the all networks, subnets list after creating +* All items created using create commands are able to be removed using the returned identifiers + +Post conditions +--------------- + +None + +------------------------------------------------------------- +Test Case 5 - Show Details of an IPv6 Network and Subnet +------------------------------------------------------------- + +Short name +---------- + +opnfv.ipv6.network_subnet_show + +Use case specification +---------------------- + +This test case evaluates the SUT API ability of showing the network, subnet +details, the reference is, + +tempest.api.network.test_networks.NetworksIpV6Test.test_show_network +tempest.api.network.test_networks.NetworksIpV6Test.test_show_subnet + +Test preconditions +------------------ + +None + +Basic test flow execution description and pass/fail criteria +------------------------------------------------------------ + +Test execution +''''''''''''''' + +* Test action 1: Create a network, storing the "id" and "name" parameter returned in the response +* Test action 2: Show the network id and name, verifying the network id and name equal to the + "id" and "name" stored in test action 1 +* **Test assertion 1:** The id and name equal to the "id" and "name" stored in test action 1 +* Test action 3: Create an IPv6 subnet of the network, storing the "id" and CIDR parameter + returned in the response +* Test action 4: Show the details of the created IPv6 subnet, verifying the + id and CIDR in the details are equal to the stored id and CIDR in test action 3. +* **Test assertion 2:** The "id" and CIDR in show details equal to "id" and CIDR stored in test action 3 +* Test action 5: Delete the IPv6 subnet using the stored "id" parameter +* Test action 6: List all subnets on the network, verify the IPv6 subnet id is no longer present in the list +* **Test assertion 3:** The IPv6 subnet "id" parameter is not present in list +* Test action 7: Delete the network created in test action 1, using the stored network id +* Test action 8: List all networks, verifying the network id is no longer present +* **Test assertion 4:** The "id" parameter is not present in the network list + +Pass / fail criteria +''''''''''''''''''''' + +This test evaluates the ability to use create commands to create network, IPv6 subnet and show +commands to show network, IPv6 subnet details on the SUT API. Specifically it verifies that: + +* Network show commands return correct "id" and "name" parameter which equal to the returned response in the create commands +* IPv6 subnet show commands return correct "id" and CIDR parameter which equal to the returned response in the create commands +* All items created using create commands are able to be removed using the returned identifiers + +Post conditions +--------------- + +None + +------------------------------------------------------------- +Test Case 6 - Create an IPv6 Port in Allowed Allocation Pools +------------------------------------------------------------- + +Short name +---------- + +opnfv.ipv6.port_create_in_allocation_pool + +Use case specification +---------------------- + +This test case evaluates the SUT API ability of creating +an IPv6 subnet within allowed IPv6 address allocation pool and creating +a port whose address is in the range of the pool, the reference is, + +tempest.api.network.test_ports.PortsIpV6TestJSON.test_create_port_in_allowed_allocation_pools + +Test preconditions +------------------ + +There should be an IPv6 CIDR configuration, which prefixlen is less than 126. + +Basic test flow execution description and pass/fail criteria +------------------------------------------------------------ + +Test execution +''''''''''''''' + +* Test action 1: Create a network, storing the "id" parameter returned in the response +* Test action 2: Check the allocation pools configuration, verifying the prefixlen + of the IPv6 CIDR configuration is less than 126. +* **Test assertion 1:** The prefixlen of the IPv6 CIDR configuration is less than 126 +* Test action 3: Get the allocation pool by setting the start_ip and end_ip + based on the IPv6 CIDR configuration. +* Test action 4: Create an IPv6 subnet of the network within the allocation pools, + storing the "id" parameter returned in the response +* Test action 5: Create a port of the network, storing the "id" parameter returned in the response +* Test action 6: Verify the port's id is in the range of the allocation pools which is got is test action 3 +* **Test assertion 2:** the port's id is in the range of the allocation pools +* Test action 7: Delete the port using the stored "id" parameter +* Test action 8: List all ports, verify the port id is no longer present in the list +* **Test assertion 3:** The port "id" parameter is not present in list +* Test action 9: Delete the IPv6 subnet using the stored "id" parameter +* Test action 10: List all subnets on the network, verify the IPv6 subnet id is no longer present in the list +* **Test assertion 4:** The IPv6 subnet "id" parameter is not present in list +* Test action 11: Delete the network created in test action 1, using the stored network id +* Test action 12: List all networks, verifying the network id is no longer present +* **Test assertion 5:** The "id" parameter is not present in the network list + +Pass / fail criteria +''''''''''''''''''''' + +This test evaluates the ability to use create commands to create an IPv6 subnet within allowed +IPv6 address allocation pool and create a port whose address is in the range of the pool. Specifically it verifies that: + +* IPv6 subnet create command to create an IPv6 subnet within allowed IPv6 address allocation pool +* Port create command to create a port whose id is in the range of the allocation pools +* All items created using create commands are able to be removed using the returned identifiers + +Post conditions +--------------- + +None + +------------------------------------------------------------- +Test Case 7 - Create an IPv6 Port with Empty Security Groups +------------------------------------------------------------- + +Short name +----------- + +opnfv.ipv6.port_create_empty_security_group + +Use case specification +---------------------- + +This test case evaluates the SUT API ability of creating port with empty +security group, the reference is, + +tempest.api.network.test_ports.PortsIpV6TestJSON.test_create_port_with_no_securitygroups + +Test preconditions +------------------ + +None + +Basic test flow execution description and pass/fail criteria +------------------------------------------------------------ + +Test execution +''''''''''''''' + +* Test action 1: Create a network, storing the "id" parameter returned in the response +* Test action 2: Create an IPv6 subnet of the network, storing the "id" parameter returned in the response +* Test action 3: Create a port of the network with an empty security group, storing the "id" parameter returned in the response +* Test action 4: Verify the security group of the port is not none but is empty +* **Test assertion 1:** the security group of the port is not none but is empty +* Test action 5: Delete the port using the stored "id" parameter +* Test action 6: List all ports, verify the port id is no longer present in the list +* **Test assertion 2:** The port "id" parameter is not present in list +* Test action 7: Delete the IPv6 subnet using the stored "id" parameter +* Test action 8: List all subnets on the network, verify the IPv6 subnet id is no longer present in the list +* **Test assertion 3:** The IPv6 subnet "id" parameter is not present in list +* Test action 9: Delete the network created in test action 1, using the stored network id +* Test action 10: List all networks, verifying the network id is no longer present +* **Test assertion 4:** The "id" parameter is not present in the network list + +Pass / fail criteria +''''''''''''''''''''' + +This test evaluates the ability to use create commands to create port with +empty security group of the SUT API. Specifically it verifies that: + +* Port create commands to create a port with an empty security group +* All items created using create commands are able to be removed using the returned identifiers + +Post conditions +--------------- + +None + +----------------------------------------------------- +Test Case 8 - Create, Update and Delete an IPv6 Port +----------------------------------------------------- + +Short name +---------- + +opnfv.ipv6.port_create_update_delete + +Use case specification +---------------------- + +This test case evaluates the SUT API ability of creating, updating, +deleting IPv6 port, the reference is, + +tempest.api.network.test_ports.PortsIpV6TestJSON.test_create_update_delete_port + +Test preconditions +------------------ + +None + +Basic test flow execution description and pass/fail criteria +------------------------------------------------------------ + +Test execution +''''''''''''''' + +* Test action 1: Create a network, storing the "id" parameter returned in the response +* Test action 2: Create a port of the network, storing the "id" and "admin_state_up" parameters + returned in the response +* Test action 3: Verify the value of port's 'admin_state_up' is True +* **Test assertion 1:** the value of port's 'admin_state_up' is True after creating +* Test action 4: Update the port's name with a new_name and set port's admin_state_up to False, + storing the name and admin_state_up parameters returned in the response +* Test action 5: Verify the stored port's name equals to new_name and the port's admin_state_up is False. +* **Test assertion 2:** the stored port's name equals to new_name and the port's admin_state_up is False +* Test action 6: Delete the port using the stored "id" parameter +* Test action 7: List all ports, verify the port is no longer present in the list +* **Test assertion 3:** The port "id" parameter is not present in list +* Test action 8: Delete the network created in test action 1, using the stored network id +* Test action 9: List all networks, verifying the network id is no longer present +* **Test assertion 4:** The "id" parameter is not present in the network list + +Pass / fail criteria +'''''''''''''''''''' + +This test evaluates the ability to use create/update/delete commands to create/update/delete port +of the SUT API. Specifically it verifies that: + +* Port create commands return True of 'admin_state_up' in response +* Port update commands to update 'name' to new_name and 'admin_state_up' to false +* All items created using create commands are able to be removed using the returned identifiers + +Post conditions +--------------- + +None + +------------------------------ +Test Case 9 - List IPv6 Ports +------------------------------ + +Short name +---------- + +opnfv.ipv6.tc009.port_list + +Use case specification +---------------------- + +This test case evaluates the SUT ability of creating a port on a network and +finding the port in the all ports list, the reference is, + +tempest.api.network.test_ports.PortsIpV6TestJSON.test_list_ports + +Test preconditions +------------------ + +None + +Basic test flow execution description and pass/fail criteria +------------------------------------------------------------ + +Test execution +''''''''''''''' + +* Test action 1: Create a network, storing the "id" parameter returned in the response +* Test action 2: Create a port of the network, storing the "id" parameter returned in the response +* Test action 3: List all ports, verify the port id is found in the list +* **Test assertion 1:** The "id" parameter is found in the port list +* Test action 4: Delete the port using the stored "id" parameter +* Test action 5: List all ports, verify the port is no longer present in the list +* **Test assertion 2:** The port "id" parameter is not present in list +* Test action 6: Delete the network created in test action 1, using the stored network id +* Test action 7: List all networks, verifying the network id is no longer present +* **Test assertion 3:** The "id" parameter is not present in the network list + +Pass / fail criteria +''''''''''''''''''''' + +This test evaluates the ability to use list commands to list the networks and ports on +the SUT API. Specifically it verifies that: + +* Port list command to list all ports, the created port is found in the list. +* All items created using create commands are able to be removed using the returned identifiers + +Post conditions +--------------- + +None + +------------------------------------------------------- +Test Case 10 - Show Key/Valus Details of an IPv6 Port +------------------------------------------------------- + +Short name +---------- + +opnfv.ipv6.tc010.port_show_details + +Use case specification +---------------------- + +This test case evaluates the SUT ability of showing the port +details, the values in the details should be equal to the values to create the port, +the reference is, + +tempest.api.network.test_ports.PortsIpV6TestJSON.test_show_port + +Test preconditions +------------------ + +None + +Basic test flow execution description and pass/fail criteria +------------------------------------------------------------ + +Test execution +''''''''''''''' + +* Test action 1: Create a network, storing the "id" parameter returned in the response +* Test action 2: Create a port of the network, storing the "id" parameter returned in the response +* Test action 3: Show the details of the port, verify the stored port's id + in test action 2 exists in the details +* **Test assertion 1:** The "id" parameter is found in the port shown details +* Test action 4: Verify the values in the details of the port are the same as the values + to create the port +* **Test assertion 2:** The values in the details of the port are the same as the values + to create the port +* Test action 5: Delete the port using the stored "id" parameter +* Test action 6: List all ports, verify the port is no longer present in the list +* **Test assertion 3:** The port "id" parameter is not present in list +* Test action 7: Delete the network created in test action 1, using the stored network id +* Test action 8: List all networks, verifying the network id is no longer present +* **Test assertion 4:** The "id" parameter is not present in the network list + +Pass / fail criteria +''''''''''''''''''''' + +This test evaluates the ability to use show commands to show port details on the SUT API. +Specifically it verifies that: + +* Port show commands to show the details of the port, whose id is in the details +* Port show commands to show the details of the port, whose values are the same as the values + to create the port +* All items created using create commands are able to be removed using the returned identifiers + +Post conditions +--------------- + +None + +--------------------------------------------------------- +Test Case 11 - Add Multiple Interfaces for an IPv6 Router +--------------------------------------------------------- + +Short name +----------- + +opnfv.ipv6.router_add_multiple_interface + +Use case specification +---------------------- + +This test case evaluates the SUT ability of adding multiple interface +to a router, the reference is, + +tempest.api.network.test_routers.RoutersIpV6Test.test_add_multiple_router_interfaces + +Test preconditions +------------------ + +None + +Basic test flow execution description and pass/fail criteria +------------------------------------------------------------ + +Test execution +''''''''''''''' + +* Test action 1: Create 2 networks named network01 and network02 sequentially, + storing the "id" parameters returned in the response +* Test action 2: Create an IPv6 subnet01 in network01, an IPv6 subnet02 in network02 sequentially, + storing the "id" parameters returned in the response +* Test action 3: Create a router, storing the "id" parameter returned in the response +* Test action 4: Create interface01 with subnet01 and the router +* Test action 5: Verify the router_id stored in test action 3 equals to the interface01's 'device_id' + and subnet01_id stored in test action 2 equals to the interface01's 'subnet_id' +* **Test assertion 1:** the router_id equals to the interface01's 'device_id' + and subnet01_id equals to the interface01's 'subnet_id' +* Test action 5: Create interface02 with subnet02 and the router +* Test action 6: Verify the router_id stored in test action 3 equals to the interface02's 'device_id' + and subnet02_id stored in test action 2 equals to the interface02's 'subnet_id' +* **Test assertion 2:** the router_id equals to the interface02's 'device_id' + and subnet02_id equals to the interface02's 'subnet_id' +* Test action 7: Delete the interfaces, router, IPv6 subnets and networks, networks, subnets, then list + all interfaces, ports, IPv6 subnets, networks, the test passes if the deleted ones + are not found in the list. +* **Test assertion 3:** The interfaces, router, IPv6 subnets and networks ids are not present in the lists + after deleting + +Pass / fail criteria +''''''''''''''''''''' + +This test evaluates the ability to use bulk create commands to create networks, IPv6 subnets and ports on +the SUT API. Specifically it verifies that: + +* Interface create commands to create interface with IPv6 subnet and router, interface 'device_id' and + 'subnet_id' should equal to the router id and IPv6 subnet id, respectively. +* Interface create commands to create multiple interface with the same router and multiple IPv6 subnets. +* All items created using create commands are able to be removed using the returned identifiers + +Post conditions +--------------- + +None + +------------------------------------------------------------------- +Test Case 12 - Add and Remove an IPv6 Router Interface with port_id +------------------------------------------------------------------- + +Short name +---------- + +opnfv.ipv6.router_interface_add_remove_with_port + +Use case specification +---------------------- + +This test case evaluates the SUT abiltiy of adding, removing router interface to +a port, the subnet_id and port_id of the interface will be checked, +the port's device_id will be checked if equals to the router_id or not. The +reference is, + +tempest.api.network.test_routers.RoutersIpV6Test.test_add_remove_router_interface_with_port_id + +Test preconditions +------------------ + +None + +Basic test flow execution description and pass/fail criteria +------------------------------------------------------------ + +Test execution +''''''''''''''' + +* Test action 1: Create a network, storing the "id" parameter returned in the response +* Test action 2: Create an IPv6 subnet of the network, storing the "id" parameter returned in the response +* Test action 3: Create a router, storing the "id" parameter returned in the response +* Test action 4: Create a port of the network, storing the "id" parameter returned in the response +* Test action 5: Add router interface to the port created, storing the "id" parameter returned in the response +* Test action 6: Verify the interface's keys include 'subnet_id' and 'port_id' +* **Test assertion 1:** the interface's keys include 'subnet_id' and 'port_id' +* Test action 7: Show the port details, verify the 'device_id' in port details equals to the router id stored + in test action 3 +* **Test assertion 2:** 'device_id' in port details equals to the router id +* Test action 8: Delete the interface, port, router, subnet and network, then list + all interfaces, ports, routers, subnets and networks, the test passes if the deleted + ones are not found in the list. +* **Test assertion 3:** interfaces, ports, routers, subnets and networks are not found in the lists after deleting + +Pass / fail criteria +''''''''''''''''''''' + +This test evaluates the ability to use add/remove commands to add/remove router interface to the port, +show commands to show port details on the SUT API. Specifically it verifies that: + +* Router_interface add commands to add router interface to a port, the interface's keys should include 'subnet_id' and 'port_id' +* Port show commands to show 'device_id' in port details, which should be equal to the router id +* All items created using create commands are able to be removed using the returned identifiers + +Post conditions +--------------- + +None + +--------------------------------------------------------------------- +Test Case 13 - Add and Remove an IPv6 Router Interface with subnet_id +--------------------------------------------------------------------- + +Short name +---------- + +opnfv.ipv6.router_interface_add_remove + +Use case specification +---------------------- + +This test case evaluates the SUT API ability of adding and removing a router interface with +the IPv6 subnet id, the reference is + +tempest.api.network.test_routers.RoutersIpV6Test.test_add_remove_router_interface_with_subnet_id + +Test preconditions +------------------ + +None + +Basic test flow execution description and pass/fail criteria +------------------------------------------------------------ + +Test execution +''''''''''''''' + +* Test action 1: Create a network, storing the "id" parameter returned in the response +* Test action 2: Create an IPv6 subnet with the network created, storing the "id" parameter + returned in the response +* Test action 3: Create a router, storing the "id" parameter returned in the response +* Test action 4: Add a router interface with the stored ids of the router and IPv6 subnet +* **Test assertion 1:** Key 'subnet_id' is included in the added interface's keys +* **Test assertion 2:** Key 'port_id' is included in the added interface's keys +* Test action 5: Show the port info with the stored interface's port id +* **Test assertion 3:**: The stored router id is equal to the device id shown in the port info +* Test action 6: Delete the router interface created in test action 4, using the stored subnet id +* Test action 7: List all router interfaces, verifying the router interface is no longer present +* **Test assertion 4:** The router interface with the stored subnet id is not present + in the router interface list +* Test action 8: Delete the router created in test action 3, using the stored router id +* Test action 9: List all routers, verifying the router id is no longer present +* **Test assertion 5:** The router "id" parameter is not present in the router list +* Test action 10: Delete the subnet created in test action 2, using the stored subnet id +* Test action 11: List all subnets, verifying the subnet id is no longer present +* **Test assertion 6:** The subnet "id" parameter is not present in the subnet list +* Test action 12: Delete the network created in test action 1, using the stored network id +* Test action 13: List all networks, verifying the network id is no longer present +* **Test assertion 7:** The network "id" parameter is not present in the network list + +Pass / fail criteria +'''''''''''''''''''' + +This test evaluates the ability to add and remove router interface with the subnet id on the +SUT API. Specifically it verifies that: + +* Router interface add command returns valid 'subnet_id' parameter which is reported + in the interface's keys +* Router interface add command returns valid 'port_id' parameter which is reported + in the interface's keys +* All items created using create commands are able to be removed using the returned identifiers + +Post conditions +--------------- + +None + +------------------------------------------------------------------- +Test Case 14 - Create, Show, List, Update and Delete an IPv6 router +------------------------------------------------------------------- + +Short name +---------- + +opnfv.ipv6.router_create_show_list_update_delete + +Use case specification +---------------------- + +This test case evaluates the SUT API ability of creating, showing, listing, updating +and deleting routers, the reference is + +tempest.api.network.test_routers.RoutersIpV6Test.test_create_show_list_update_delete_router + +Test preconditions +------------------ + +There should exist an OpenStack external network. + +Basic test flow execution description and pass/fail criteria +------------------------------------------------------------ + +Test execution +''''''''''''''' + +* Test action 1: Create a router, set the admin_state_up to be False and external_network_id + to be public network id, storing the "id" parameter returned in the response +* **Test assertion 1:** The created router's admin_state_up is False +* **Test assertion 2:** The created router's external network id equals to the public network id +* Test action 2: Show details of the router created in test action 1, using the stored router id +* **Test assertion 3:** The router's name shown is the same as the router created +* **Test assertion 4:** The router's external network id shown is the same as the public network id +* Test action 3: List all routers and verify if created router is in response message +* **Test assertion 5:** The stored router id is in the router list +* Test action 4: Update the name of router and verify if it is updated +* **Test assertion 6:** The name of router equals to the name used to update in test action 4 +* Test action 5: Show the details of router, using the stored router id +* **Test assertion 7:** The router's name shown equals to the name used to update in test action 4 +* Test action 6: Delete the router created in test action 1, using the stored router id +* Test action 7: List all routers, verifying the router id is no longer present +* **Test assertion 8:** The "id" parameter is not present in the router list + +Pass / fail criteria +''''''''''''''''''''' + +This test evaluates the ability to create, show, list, update and delete router on +the SUT API. Specifically it verifies that: + +* Router create command returns valid "admin_state_up" and "id" parameters which equal to the + "admin_state_up" and "id" returned in the response +* Router show command returns valid "name" parameter which equals to the "name" returned in the response +* Router show command returns valid "external network id" parameters which equals to the public network id +* Router list command returns valid "id" parameter which equals to the stored router "id" +* Router update command returns updated "name" parameters which equals to the "name" used to update +* Router created using create command is able to be removed using the returned identifiers + +Post conditions +--------------- + +None + +--------------------------------------------------------------------------- +Test Case 15 - Create, List, Update, Show and Delete an IPv6 security group +--------------------------------------------------------------------------- + +Short name +---------- + +opnfv.ipv6.security_group_create_list_update_show_delete + +Use case specification +---------------------- + +This test case evaluates the SUT API ability of creating, listing, updating, showing +and deleting security groups, the reference is + +tempest.api.network.test_security_groups.SecGroupIPv6Test.test_create_list_update_show_delete_security_group + +Test preconditions +------------------ + +None + +Basic test flow execution description and pass/fail criteria +------------------------------------------------------------ + +Test execution +''''''''''''''' + +* Test action 1: Create a security group, storing the "id" parameter returned in the response +* Test action 2: List all security groups and verify if created security group is there in response +* **Test assertion 1:** The created security group's "id" is found in the list +* Test action 3: Update the name and description of this security group, using the stored id +* Test action 4: Verify if the security group's name and description are updated +* **Test assertion 2:** The security group's name equals to the name used in test action 3 +* **Test assertion 3:** The security group's description equals to the description used in test action 3 +* Test action 5: Show details of the updated security group, using the stored id +* **Test assertion 4:** The security group's name shown equals to the name used in test action 3 +* **Test assertion 5:** The security group's description shown equals to the description used in test action 3 +* Test action 6: Delete the security group created in test action 1, using the stored id +* Test action 7: List all security groups, verifying the security group's id is no longer present +* **Test assertion 6:** The "id" parameter is not present in the security group list + +Pass / fail criteria +'''''''''''''''''''' + +This test evaluates the ability to create list, update, show and delete security group on +the SUT API. Specifically it verifies that: + +* Security group create commands return valid "id" parameter which is reported in the list commands +* Security group update commands return valid "name" and "description" parameters which are + reported in the show commands +* Security group created using create command is able to be removed using the returned identifiers + +Post conditions +--------------- + +None + +--------------------------------------------------------------- +Test Case 16 - Create, Show and Delete IPv6 security group rule +--------------------------------------------------------------- + +Short name +---------- + +opnfv.ipv6.security_group_rule_create_show_delete + +Use case specification +---------------------- + +This test case evaluates the SUT API ability of creating, showing, listing and deleting +security group rules, the reference is + +tempest.api.network.test_security_groups.SecGroupIPv6Test.test_create_show_delete_security_group_rule + +Test preconditions +------------------ + +None + +Basic test flow execution description and pass/fail criteria +------------------------------------------------------------ + +Test execution +''''''''''''''' + +* Test action 1: Create a security group, storing the "id" parameter returned in the response +* Test action 2: Create a rule of the security group with protocol tcp, udp and icmp, respectively, + using the stored security group's id, storing the "id" parameter returned in the response +* Test action 3: Show details of the created security group rule, using the stored id of the + security group rule +* **Test assertion 1:** All the created security group rule's values equal to the rule values + shown in test action 3 +* Test action 4: List all security group rules +* **Test assertion 2:** The stored security group rule's id is found in the list +* Test action 5: Delete the security group rule, using the stored security group rule's id +* Test action 6: List all security group rules, verifying the security group rule's id is no longer present +* **Test assertion 3:** The security group rule "id" parameter is not present in the list +* Test action 7: Delete the security group, using the stored security group's id +* Test action 8: List all security groups, verifying the security group's id is no longer present +* **Test assertion 4:** The security group "id" parameter is not present in the list + +Pass / fail criteria +''''''''''''''''''''' + +This test evaluates the ability to create, show, list and delete security group rules on +the SUT API. Specifically it verifies that: + +* Security group rule create command returns valid values which are reported in the show command +* Security group rule created using create command is able to be removed using the returned identifiers + +Post conditions +--------------- + +None + +---------------------------------------- +Test Case 17 - List IPv6 Security Groups +---------------------------------------- + +Short name +---------- + +opnfv.ipv6.security_group_list + +Use case specification +---------------------- + +This test case evaluates the SUT API ability of listing security groups, the reference is + +tempest.api.network.test_security_groups.SecGroupIPv6Test.test_list_security_groups + +Test preconditions +------------------ + +There should exist a default security group. + +Basic test flow execution description and pass/fail criteria +------------------------------------------------------------ + +Test execution +''''''''''''''' + +* Test action 1: List all security groups +* Test action 2: Verify the default security group exists in the list, the test passes + if the default security group exists +* **Test assertion 1:** The default security group is in the list + +Pass / fail criteria +''''''''''''''''''''' + +This test evaluates the ability to list security groups on the SUT API. +Specifically it verifies that: + +* Security group list command return valid security groups which include the default security group + +Post conditions +--------------- + +None + +---------------------------------------------------------------------------- +Test Case 18 - IPv6 Address Assignment - Dual Stack, SLAAC, DHCPv6 Stateless +---------------------------------------------------------------------------- + +Short name +---------- + +opnfv.ipv6.dhcpv6_stateless + +Use case specification +---------------------- + +This test case evaluates IPv6 address assignment in ipv6_ra_mode 'dhcpv6_stateless' +and ipv6_address_mode 'dhcpv6_stateless'. +In this case, guest instance obtains IPv6 address from OpenStack managed radvd +using SLAAC and optional info from dnsmasq using DHCPv6 stateless. This test case then +verifies the ping6 available VM can ping the other VM's v4 and v6 addresses +as well as the v6 subnet's gateway ip in the same network, the reference is + +tempest.scenario.test_network_v6.TestGettingAddress.test_dhcp6_stateless_from_os + +Test preconditions +------------------ + +There should exist a public router or a public network. + +Basic test flow execution description and pass/fail criteria +------------------------------------------------------------ + +Test execution +''''''''''''''' + +* Test action 1: Create one network, storing the "id" parameter returned in the response +* Test action 2: Create one IPv4 subnet of the created network, storing the "id" + parameter returned in the response +* Test action 3: If there exists a public router, use it as the router. Otherwise, + use the public network to create a router +* Test action 4: Connect the IPv4 subnet to the router, using the stored IPv4 subnet id +* Test action 5: Create one IPv6 subnet of the network created in test action 1 in + ipv6_ra_mode 'dhcpv6_stateless' and ipv6_address_mode 'dhcpv6_stateless', + storing the "id" parameter returned in the response +* Test action 6: Connect the IPv6 subnet to the router, using the stored IPv6 subnet id +* Test action 7: Boot two VMs on this network, storing the "id" parameters returned in the response +* **Test assertion 1:** The vNIC of each VM gets one v4 address and one v6 address actually assigned +* **Test assertion 2:** Each VM can ping the other's v4 private address +* **Test assertion 3:** The ping6 available VM can ping the other's v6 address + as well as the v6 subnet's gateway ip +* Test action 8: Delete the 2 VMs created in test action 7, using the stored ids +* Test action 9: List all VMs, verifying the ids are no longer present +* **Test assertion 4:** The two "id" parameters are not present in the VM list +* Test action 10: Delete the IPv4 subnet created in test action 2, using the stored id +* Test action 11: Delete the IPv6 subnet created in test action 5, using the stored id +* Test action 12: List all subnets, verifying the ids are no longer present +* **Test assertion 5:** The "id" parameters of IPv4 and IPv6 are not present in the list +* Test action 13: Delete the network created in test action 1, using the stored id +* Test action 14: List all networks, verifying the id is no longer present +* **Test assertion 6:** The "id" parameter is not present in the network list + +Pass / fail criteria +''''''''''''''''''''' + +This test evaluates the ability to assign IPv6 addresses in ipv6_ra_mode +'dhcpv6_stateless' and ipv6_address_mode 'dhcpv6_stateless', +and verify the ping6 available VM can ping the other VM's v4 and v6 addresses as well as +the v6 subnet's gateway ip in the same network. Specifically it verifies that: + +* The IPv6 addresses in mode 'dhcpv6_stateless' assigned successfully +* The VM can ping the other VM's IPv4 and IPv6 private addresses as well as the v6 subnet's gateway ip +* All items created using create commands are able to be removed using the returned identifiers + +Post conditions +--------------- + +None + +-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- +Test Case 19 - IPv6 Address Assignment - Dual Net, Dual Stack, SLAAC, DHCPv6 Stateless +-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- + +Short name +---------- + +opnfv.ipv6.dualnet_dhcpv6_stateless + +Use case specification +---------------------- + +This test case evaluates IPv6 address assignment in ipv6_ra_mode 'dhcpv6_stateless' +and ipv6_address_mode 'dhcpv6_stateless'. +In this case, guest instance obtains IPv6 address from OpenStack managed radvd +using SLAAC and optional info from dnsmasq using DHCPv6 stateless. This test case then +verifies the ping6 available VM can ping the other VM's v4 address in one network +and v6 address in another network as well as the v6 subnet's gateway ip, the reference is + +tempest.scenario.test_network_v6.TestGettingAddress.test_dualnet_dhcp6_stateless_from_os + +Test preconditions +------------------ + +There should exists a public router or a public network. + +Basic test flow execution description and pass/fail criteria +------------------------------------------------------------ + +Test execution +''''''''''''''' + +* Test action 1: Create one network, storing the "id" parameter returned in the response +* Test action 2: Create one IPv4 subnet of the created network, storing the "id" + parameter returned in the response +* Test action 3: If there exists a public router, use it as the router. Otherwise, + use the public network to create a router +* Test action 4: Connect the IPv4 subnet to the router, using the stored IPv4 subnet id +* Test action 5: Create another network, storing the "id" parameter returned in the response +* Test action 6: Create one IPv6 subnet of network created in test action 5 in + ipv6_ra_mode 'dhcpv6_stateless' and ipv6_address_mode 'dhcpv6_stateless', + storing the "id" parameter returned in the response +* Test action 7: Connect the IPv6 subnet to the router, using the stored IPv6 subnet id +* Test action 8: Boot two VMs on these two networks, storing the "id" parameters returned in the response +* Test action 9: Turn on 2nd NIC of each VM for the network created in test action 5 +* **Test assertion 1:** The 1st vNIC of each VM gets one v4 address assigned and + the 2nd vNIC of each VM gets one v6 address actually assigned +* **Test assertion 2:** Each VM can ping the other's v4 private address +* **Test assertion 3:** The ping6 available VM can ping the other's v6 address + as well as the v6 subnet's gateway ip +* Test action 10: Delete the 2 VMs created in test action 8, using the stored ids +* Test action 11: List all VMs, verifying the ids are no longer present +* **Test assertion 4:** The two "id" parameters are not present in the VM list +* Test action 12: Delete the IPv4 subnet created in test action 2, using the stored id +* Test action 13: Delete the IPv6 subnet created in test action 6, using the stored id +* Test action 14: List all subnets, verifying the ids are no longer present +* **Test assertion 5:** The "id" parameters of IPv4 and IPv6 are not present in the list +* Test action 15: Delete the 2 networks created in test action 1 and 5, using the stored ids +* Test action 16: List all networks, verifying the ids are no longer present +* **Test assertion 6:** The two "id" parameters are not present in the network list + +Pass / fail criteria +'''''''''''''''''''' + +This test evaluates the ability to assign IPv6 addresses in ipv6_ra_mode 'dhcpv6_stateless' +and ipv6_address_mode 'dhcpv6_stateless', and verify the ping6 available VM can ping +the other VM's v4 address in one network and v6 address in another network as well as +the v6 subnet's gateway ip. Specifically it verifies that: + +* The IPv6 addresses in mode 'dhcpv6_stateless' assigned successfully +* The VM can ping the other VM's IPv4 address in one network and IPv6 address in another + network as well as the v6 subnet's gateway ip +* All items created using create commands are able to be removed using the returned identifiers + +Post conditions +--------------- + +None + +----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- +Test Case 20 - IPv6 Address Assignment - Multiple Prefixes, Dual Stack, SLAAC, DHCPv6 Stateless +----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- + +Short name +---------- + +opnfv.ipv6.multiple_prefixes_dhcpv6_stateless + +Use case specification +---------------------- + +This test case evaluates IPv6 address assignment in ipv6_ra_mode 'dhcpv6_stateless' +and ipv6_address_mode 'dhcpv6_stateless'. +In this case, guest instance obtains IPv6 addresses from OpenStack managed radvd +using SLAAC and optional info from dnsmasq using DHCPv6 stateless. This test case then +verifies the ping6 available VM can ping the other VM's one v4 address and two v6 +addresses with different prefixes as well as the v6 subnets' gateway ips in the +same network, the reference is + +tempest.scenario.test_network_v6.TestGettingAddress.test_multi_prefix_dhcpv6_stateless + +Test preconditions +------------------ + +There should exist a public router or a public network. + +Basic test flow execution description and pass/fail criteria +------------------------------------------------------------ + +Test execution +''''''''''''''' + +* Test action 1: Create one network, storing the "id" parameter returned in the response +* Test action 2: Create one IPv4 subnet of the created network, storing the "id" + parameter returned in the response +* Test action 3: If there exists a public router, use it as the router. Otherwise, + use the public network to create a router +* Test action 4: Connect the IPv4 subnet to the router, using the stored IPv4 subnet id +* Test action 5: Create two IPv6 subnets of the network created in test action 1 in + ipv6_ra_mode 'dhcpv6_stateless' and ipv6_address_mode 'dhcpv6_stateless', + storing the "id" parameters returned in the response +* Test action 6: Connect the two IPv6 subnets to the router, using the stored IPv6 subnet ids +* Test action 7: Boot two VMs on this network, storing the "id" parameters returned in the response +* **Test assertion 1:** The vNIC of each VM gets one v4 address and two v6 addresses with + different prefixes actually assigned +* **Test assertion 2:** Each VM can ping the other's v4 private address +* **Test assertion 3:** The ping6 available VM can ping the other's v6 addresses + as well as the v6 subnets' gateway ips +* Test action 8: Delete the 2 VMs created in test action 7, using the stored ids +* Test action 9: List all VMs, verifying the ids are no longer present +* **Test assertion 4:** The two "id" parameters are not present in the VM list +* Test action 10: Delete the IPv4 subnet created in test action 2, using the stored id +* Test action 11: Delete two IPv6 subnets created in test action 5, using the stored ids +* Test action 12: List all subnets, verifying the ids are no longer present +* **Test assertion 5:** The "id" parameters of IPv4 and IPv6 are not present in the list +* Test action 13: Delete the network created in test action 1, using the stored id +* Test action 14: List all networks, verifying the id is no longer present +* **Test assertion 6:** The "id" parameter is not present in the network list + +Pass / fail criteria +''''''''''''''''''''' + +This test evaluates the ability to assign IPv6 addresses in ipv6_ra_mode 'dhcpv6_stateless' +and ipv6_address_mode 'dhcpv6_stateless', +and verify the ping6 available VM can ping the other VM's v4 address and two +v6 addresses with different prefixes as well as the v6 subnets' gateway ips in the same network. +Specifically it verifies that: + +* The different prefixes IPv6 addresses in mode 'dhcpv6_stateless' assigned successfully +* The VM can ping the other VM's IPv4 and IPv6 private addresses as well as the v6 subnets' gateway ips +* All items created using create commands are able to be removed using the returned identifiers + +Post conditions +--------------- + +None + +--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- +Test Case 21 - IPv6 Address Assignment - Dual Net, Multiple Prefixes, Dual Stack, SLAAC, DHCPv6 Stateless +--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- + +Short name +---------- + +opnfv.ipv6.dualnet_multiple_prefixes_dhcpv6_stateless + +Use case specification +---------------------- + +This test case evaluates IPv6 address assignment in ipv6_ra_mode 'dhcpv6_stateless' +and ipv6_address_mode 'dhcpv6_stateless'. +In this case, guest instance obtains IPv6 addresses from OpenStack managed radvd +using SLAAC and optional info from dnsmasq using DHCPv6 stateless. This test case then +verifies the ping6 available VM can ping the other VM's v4 address in one network +and two v6 addresses with different prefixes in another network as well as the +v6 subnets' gateway ips, the reference is + +tempest.scenario.test_network_v6.TestGettingAddress.test_dualnet_multi_prefix_dhcpv6_stateless + +Test preconditions +------------------ + +There should exist a public router or a public network. + +Basic test flow execution description and pass/fail criteria +------------------------------------------------------------ + +Test execution +''''''''''''''' + +* Test action 1: Create one network, storing the "id" parameter returned in the response +* Test action 2: Create one IPv4 subnet of the created network, storing the "id" + parameter returned in the response +* Test action 3: If there exists a public router, use it as the router. Otherwise, + use the public network to create a router +* Test action 4: Connect the IPv4 subnet to the router, using the stored IPv4 subnet id +* Test action 5: Create another network, storing the "id" parameter returned in the response +* Test action 6: Create two IPv6 subnets of network created in test action 5 in + ipv6_ra_mode 'dhcpv6_stateless' and ipv6_address_mode 'dhcpv6_stateless', + storing the "id" parameters returned in the response +* Test action 7: Connect the two IPv6 subnets to the router, using the stored IPv6 subnet ids +* Test action 8: Boot two VMs on these two networks, storing the "id" parameters returned in the response +* Test action 9: Turn on 2nd NIC of each VM for the network created in test action 5 +* **Test assertion 1:** The vNIC of each VM gets one v4 address and two v6 addresses + with different prefixes actually assigned +* **Test assertion 2:** Each VM can ping the other's v4 private address +* **Test assertion 3:** The ping6 available VM can ping the other's v6 addresses + as well as the v6 subnets' gateway ips +* Test action 10: Delete the 2 VMs created in test action 8, using the stored ids +* Test action 11: List all VMs, verifying the ids are no longer present +* **Test assertion 4:** The two "id" parameters are not present in the VM list +* Test action 12: Delete the IPv4 subnet created in test action 2, using the stored id +* Test action 13: Delete two IPv6 subnets created in test action 6, using the stored ids +* Test action 14: List all subnets, verifying the ids are no longer present +* **Test assertion 5:** The "id" parameters of IPv4 and IPv6 are not present in the list +* Test action 15: Delete the 2 networks created in test action 1 and 5, using the stored ids +* Test action 16: List all networks, verifying the ids are no longer present +* **Test assertion 6:** The two "id" parameters are not present in the network list + +Pass / fail criteria +''''''''''''''''''''' + +This test evaluates the ability to assign IPv6 addresses in ipv6_ra_mode 'dhcpv6_stateless' +and ipv6_address_mode 'dhcpv6_stateless', +and verify the ping6 available VM can ping the other VM's v4 address in one network and two +v6 addresses with different prefixes in another network as well as the v6 subnets' +gateway ips. Specifically it verifies that: + +* The IPv6 addresses in mode 'dhcpv6_stateless' assigned successfully +* The VM can ping the other VM's IPv4 and IPv6 private addresses as well as the v6 subnets' gateway ips +* All items created using create commands are able to be removed using the returned identifiers + +Post conditions +--------------- + +None + +---------------------------------------------------------- +Test Case 22 - IPv6 Address Assignment - Dual Stack, SLAAC +---------------------------------------------------------- + +Short name +---------- + +opnfv.ipv6.slaac + +Use case specification +---------------------- + +This test case evaluates IPv6 address assignment in ipv6_ra_mode 'slaac' and +ipv6_address_mode 'slaac'. +In this case, guest instance obtains IPv6 address from OpenStack managed radvd +using SLAAC. This test case then verifies the ping6 available VM can ping the other +VM's v4 and v6 addresses as well as the v6 subnet's gateway ip in the +same network, the reference is + +tempest.scenario.test_network_v6.TestGettingAddress.test_slaac_from_os + +Test preconditions +------------------ + +There should exist a public router or a public network. + +Basic test flow execution description and pass/fail criteria +------------------------------------------------------------ + +Test execution +''''''''''''''' + +* Test action 1: Create one network, storing the "id" parameter returned in the response +* Test action 2: Create one IPv4 subnet of the created network, storing the "id" + parameter returned in the response +* Test action 3: If there exists a public router, use it as the router. Otherwise, + use the public network to create a router +* Test action 4: Connect the IPv4 subnet to the router, using the stored IPv4 subnet id +* Test action 5: Create one IPv6 subnet of the network created in test action 1 in + ipv6_ra_mode 'slaac' and ipv6_address_mode 'slaac', storing the "id" parameter returned in the response +* Test action 6: Connect the IPv6 subnet to the router, using the stored IPv6 subnet id +* Test action 7: Boot two VMs on this network, storing the "id" parameters returned in the response +* **Test assertion 1:** The vNIC of each VM gets one v4 address and one v6 address actually assigned +* **Test assertion 2:** Each VM can ping the other's v4 private address +* **Test assertion 3:** The ping6 available VM can ping the other's v6 address + as well as the v6 subnet's gateway ip +* Test action 8: Delete the 2 VMs created in test action 7, using the stored ids +* Test action 9: List all VMs, verifying the ids are no longer present +* **Test assertion 4:** The two "id" parameters are not present in the VM list +* Test action 10: Delete the IPv4 subnet created in test action 2, using the stored id +* Test action 11: Delete the IPv6 subnet created in test action 5, using the stored id +* Test action 12: List all subnets, verifying the ids are no longer present +* **Test assertion 5:** The "id" parameters of IPv4 and IPv6 are not present in the list +* Test action 13: Delete the network created in test action 1, using the stored id +* Test action 14: List all networks, verifying the id is no longer present +* **Test assertion 6:** The "id" parameter is not present in the network list + +Pass / fail criteria +''''''''''''''''''''' + +This test evaluates the ability to assign IPv6 addresses in ipv6_ra_mode 'slaac' +and ipv6_address_mode 'slaac', +and verify the ping6 available VM can ping the other VM's v4 and v6 addresses as well as +the v6 subnet's gateway ip in the same network. Specifically it verifies that: + +* The IPv6 addresses in mode 'slaac' assigned successfully +* The VM can ping the other VM's IPv4 and IPv6 private addresses as well as the v6 subnet's gateway ip +* All items created using create commands are able to be removed using the returned identifiers + +Post conditions +--------------- + +None + +-------------------------------------------------------------------- +Test Case 23 - IPv6 Address Assignment - Dual Net, Dual Stack, SLAAC +-------------------------------------------------------------------- + +Short name +---------- + +opnfv.ipv6.dualnet_slaac + +Use case specification +---------------------- + +This test case evaluates IPv6 address assignment in ipv6_ra_mode 'slaac' and +ipv6_address_mode 'slaac'. +In this case, guest instance obtains IPv6 address from OpenStack managed radvd +using SLAAC. This test case then verifies the ping6 available VM can ping the other +VM's v4 address in one network and v6 address in another network as well as the +v6 subnet's gateway ip, the reference is + +tempest.scenario.test_network_v6.TestGettingAddress.test_dualnet_slaac_from_os + +Test preconditions +------------------ + +There should exist a public router or a public network. + +Basic test flow execution description and pass/fail criteria +------------------------------------------------------------ + +Test execution +''''''''''''''' + +* Test action 1: Create one network, storing the "id" parameter returned in the response +* Test action 2: Create one IPv4 subnet of the created network, storing the "id" + parameter returned in the response +* Test action 3: If there exists a public router, use it as the router. Otherwise, + use the public network to create a router +* Test action 4: Connect the IPv4 subnet to the router, using the stored IPv4 subnet id +* Test action 5: Create another network, storing the "id" parameter returned in the response +* Test action 6: Create one IPv6 subnet of network created in test action 5 in + ipv6_ra_mode 'slaac' and ipv6_address_mode 'slaac', storing the "id" parameter returned in the response +* Test action 7: Connect the IPv6 subnet to the router, using the stored IPv6 subnet id +* Test action 8: Boot two VMs on these two networks, storing the "id" parameters returned in the response +* Test action 9: Turn on 2nd NIC of each VM for the network created in test action 5 +* **Test assertion 1:** The 1st vNIC of each VM gets one v4 address assigned and + the 2nd vNIC of each VM gets one v6 address actually assigned +* **Test assertion 2:** Each VM can ping the other's v4 private address +* **Test assertion 3:** The ping6 available VM can ping the other's v6 address + as well as the v6 subnet's gateway ip +* Test action 10: Delete the 2 VMs created in test action 8, using the stored ids +* Test action 11: List all VMs, verifying the ids are no longer present +* **Test assertion 4:** The two "id" parameters are not present in the VM list +* Test action 12: Delete the IPv4 subnet created in test action 2, using the stored id +* Test action 13: Delete the IPv6 subnet created in test action 6, using the stored id +* Test action 14: List all subnets, verifying the ids are no longer present +* **Test assertion 5:** The "id" parameters of IPv4 and IPv6 are not present in the list +* Test action 15: Delete the 2 networks created in test action 1 and 5, using the stored ids +* Test action 16: List all networks, verifying the ids are no longer present +* **Test assertion 6:** The two "id" parameters are not present in the network list + +Pass / fail criteria +''''''''''''''''''''' + +This test evaluates the ability to assign IPv6 addresses in ipv6_ra_mode 'slaac' +and ipv6_address_mode 'slaac', +and verify the ping6 available VM can ping the other VM's v4 address in one network and +v6 address in another network as well as the v6 subnet's gateway ip. Specifically it verifies that: + +* The IPv6 addresses in mode 'slaac' assigned successfully +* The VM can ping the other VM's IPv4 address in one network and IPv6 address + in another network as well as the v6 subnet's gateway ip +* All items created using create commands are able to be removed using the returned identifiers + +Post conditions +--------------- + +None + +----------------------------------------------------------------------------- +Test Case 24 - IPv6 Address Assignment - Multiple Prefixes, Dual Stack, SLAAC +----------------------------------------------------------------------------- + +Short name +---------- + +opnfv.ipv6.multiple_prefixes_slaac + +Use case specification +---------------------- + +This test case evaluates IPv6 address assignment in ipv6_ra_mode 'slaac' and +ipv6_address_mode 'slaac'. +In this case, guest instance obtains IPv6 addresses from OpenStack managed radvd +using SLAAC. This test case then verifies the ping6 available VM can ping the other +VM's one v4 address and two v6 addresses with different prefixes as well as the v6 +subnets' gateway ips in the same network, the reference is + +tempest.scenario.test_network_v6.TestGettingAddress.test_multi_prefix_slaac + +Test preconditions +------------------ + +There should exists a public router or a public network. + +Basic test flow execution description and pass/fail criteria +------------------------------------------------------------ + +Test execution +''''''''''''''' + +* Test action 1: Create one network, storing the "id" parameter returned in the response +* Test action 2: Create one IPv4 subnet of the created network, storing the "id + parameter returned in the response +* Test action 3: If there exists a public router, use it as the router. Otherwise, + use the public network to create a router +* Test action 4: Connect the IPv4 subnet to the router, using the stored IPv4 subnet id +* Test action 5: Create two IPv6 subnets of the network created in test action 1 in + ipv6_ra_mode 'slaac' and ipv6_address_mode 'slaac', storing the "id" parameters returned in the response +* Test action 6: Connect the two IPv6 subnets to the router, using the stored IPv6 subnet ids +* Test action 7: Boot two VMs on this network, storing the "id" parameters returned in the response +* **Test assertion 1:** The vNIC of each VM gets one v4 address and two v6 addresses with + different prefixes actually assigned +* **Test assertion 2:** Each VM can ping the other's v4 private address +* **Test assertion 3:** The ping6 available VM can ping the other's v6 addresses + as well as the v6 subnets' gateway ips +* Test action 8: Delete the 2 VMs created in test action 7, using the stored ids +* Test action 9: List all VMs, verifying the ids are no longer present +* **Test assertion 4:** The two "id" parameters are not present in the VM list +* Test action 10: Delete the IPv4 subnet created in test action 2, using the stored id +* Test action 11: Delete two IPv6 subnets created in test action 5, using the stored ids +* Test action 12: List all subnets, verifying the ids are no longer present +* **Test assertion 5:** The "id" parameters of IPv4 and IPv6 are not present in the list +* Test action 13: Delete the network created in test action 1, using the stored id +* Test action 14: List all networks, verifying the id is no longer present +* **Test assertion 6:** The "id" parameter is not present in the network list + +Pass / fail criteria +''''''''''''''''''''' + +This test evaluates the ability to assign IPv6 addresses in ipv6_ra_mode 'slaac' +and ipv6_address_mode 'slaac', +and verify the ping6 available VM can ping the other VM's v4 address and two +v6 addresses with different prefixes as well as the v6 subnets' gateway ips in the same network. +Specifically it verifies that: + +* The different prefixes IPv6 addresses in mode 'slaac' assigned successfully +* The VM can ping the other VM's IPv4 and IPv6 private addresses as well as the v6 subnets' gateway ips +* All items created using create commands are able to be removed using the returned identifiers + +Post conditions +--------------- + +None + +--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- +Test Case 25 - IPv6 Address Assignment - Dual Net, Dual Stack, Multiple Prefixes, SLAAC +--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- + +Short name +---------- + +opnfv.ipv6.dualnet_multiple_prefixes_slaac + +Use case specification +---------------------- + +This test case evaluates IPv6 address assignment in ipv6_ra_mode 'slaac' and +ipv6_address_mode 'slaac'. +In this case, guest instance obtains IPv6 addresses from OpenStack managed radvd +using SLAAC. This test case then verifies the ping6 available VM can ping the other +VM's v4 address in one network and two v6 addresses with different prefixes in another +network as well as the v6 subnets' gateway ips, the reference is + +tempest.scenario.test_network_v6.TestGettingAddress.test_dualnet_multi_prefix_slaac + +Test preconditions +------------------ + +There should exist a public router or a public network. + +Basic test flow execution description and pass/fail criteria +------------------------------------------------------------ + +Test execution +''''''''''''''' + +* Test action 1: Create one network, storing the "id" parameter returned in the response +* Test action 2: Create one IPv4 subnet of the created network, storing the "id" + parameter returned in the response +* Test action 3: If there exists a public router, use it as the router. Otherwise, + use the public network to create a router +* Test action 4: Connect the IPv4 subnet to the router, using the stored IPv4 subnet id +* Test action 5: Create another network, storing the "id" parameter returned in the response +* Test action 6: Create two IPv6 subnets of network created in test action 5 in + ipv6_ra_mode 'slaac' and ipv6_address_mode 'slaac', storing the "id" parameters returned in the response +* Test action 7: Connect the two IPv6 subnets to the router, using the stored IPv6 subnet ids +* Test action 8: Boot two VMs on these two networks, storing the "id" parameters returned in the response +* Test action 9: Turn on 2nd NIC of each VM for the network created in test action 5 +* **Test assertion 1:** The vNIC of each VM gets one v4 address and two v6 addresses + with different prefixes actually assigned +* **Test assertion 2:** Each VM can ping the other's v4 private address +* **Test assertion 3:** The ping6 available VM can ping the other's v6 addresses + as well as the v6 subnets' gateway ips +* Test action 10: Delete the 2 VMs created in test action 8, using the stored ids +* Test action 11: List all VMs, verifying the ids are no longer present +* **Test assertion 4:** The two "id" parameters are not present in the VM list +* Test action 12: Delete the IPv4 subnet created in test action 2, using the stored id +* Test action 13: Delete two IPv6 subnets created in test action 6, using the stored ids +* Test action 14: List all subnets, verifying the ids are no longer present +* **Test assertion 5:** The "id" parameters of IPv4 and IPv6 are not present in the list +* Test action 15: Delete the 2 networks created in test action 1 and 5, using the stored ids +* Test action 16: List all networks, verifying the ids are no longer present +* **Test assertion 6:** The two "id" parameters are not present in the network list + +Pass / fail criteria +''''''''''''''''''''' + +This test evaluates the ability to assign IPv6 addresses in ipv6_ra_mode 'slaac' +and ipv6_address_mode 'slaac', +and verify the ping6 available VM can ping the other VM's v4 address in one network and two +v6 addresses with different prefixes in another network as well as the v6 subnets' gateway ips. +Specifically it verifies that: + +* The IPv6 addresses in mode 'slaac' assigned successfully +* The VM can ping the other VM's IPv4 and IPv6 private addresses as well as the v6 subnets' gateway ips +* All items created using create commands are able to be removed using the returned identifiers + +Post conditions +--------------- + +None + + + diff --git a/docs/testing/user/testspecification/machinelifecycle/index.rst b/docs/testing/user/testspecification/machinelifecycle/index.rst new file mode 100644 index 00000000..598812f5 --- /dev/null +++ b/docs/testing/user/testspecification/machinelifecycle/index.rst @@ -0,0 +1,757 @@ +.. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. +.. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 +.. (c) Huawei Technologies Co.,Ltd + +=========================================================== +Common virtual machine life cycle events test specification +=========================================================== + +.. toctree:: + :maxdepth: 2 + +Scope +===== + +The common virtual machine life cycle events test area evaluates the ability of +the system under test to behave correctly after common virtual machine life +cycle events. The tests in this test area will evaluate: + +- Stop/Start a server +- Reboot a server +- Rebuild a server +- Pause/Unpause a server +- Suspend/Resume a server +- Resize a server +- Resizing a volume-backed server +- Sequence suspend resume +- Shelve/Unshelve a server +- Cold migrate a server +- Live migrate a server + +References +========== + +- iSCSI + + - https://docs.openstack.org/liberty/config-reference/content/config-iscsi-storage.html + +Definitions and abbreviations +============================= + +The following terms and abbreviations are used in conjunction with this test area + +- API - Application Programming Interface +- NFVi - Network Functions Virtualization infrastructure +- VIM - Virtual Infrastructure Manager +- VM - Virtual Machine + +System Under Test (SUT) +======================= + +The system under test is assumed to be the NFVi and VIM in operation on a +Pharos compliant infrastructure. + +Test Area Structure +=================== + +The test area is structured based on common virtual machine life cycle events. +Each test case is able to run independently, i.e. irrelevant of the state +created by a previous test. Specifically, every test performs clean-up +operations which return the system to the same state as before the test. + +Test Descriptions +================= + +API Used and Reference +---------------------- + +Block storage: https://developer.openstack.org/api-ref/block-storage + +- create volume +- delete volume +- attach volume to server +- detach volume from server + +Security Groups: https://developer.openstack.org/api-ref/network/v2/index.html#security-groups-security-groups + +- create security group +- delete security group + +Networks: https://developer.openstack.org/api-ref/networking/v2/index.html#networks + +- create network +- delete network + +Routers and interface: https://developer.openstack.org/api-ref/networking/v2/index.html#routers-routers + +- create router +- delete router +- add interface to router + +Subnets: https://developer.openstack.org/api-ref/networking/v2/index.html#subnets + +- create subnet +- delete subnet + +Servers: https://developer.openstack.org/api-ref/compute/ + +- create keypair +- create server +- show server +- delete server +- add/assign floating IP +- resize server +- revert resized server +- confirm resized server +- pause server +- unpause server +- start server +- stop server +- reboot server +- rebuild server +- suspend server +- resume suspended server +- shelve server +- unshelve server +- migrate server +- live-migrate server + +Ports: https://developer.openstack.org/api-ref/networking/v2/index.html#ports + +- create port +- delete port + +Floating IPs: https://developer.openstack.org/api-ref/networking/v2/index.html#floating-ips-floatingips + +- create floating IP +- delete floating IP + +Availability zone: https://developer.openstack.org/api-ref/compute/ + +- get availability zone + +------------------------------------ +Test Case 1 - Minimum basic scenario +------------------------------------ + +Test case specification +----------------------- + +tempest.scenario.test_minimum_basic.TestMinimumBasicScenario.test_minimum_basic_scenario + +Test preconditions +------------------ + +* Nova, cinder, glance, neutron services are available +* One public network + +Basic test flow execution description and pass/fail criteria +------------------------------------------------------------ + +Test execution +'''''''''''''' + +* Test action 1: Create an image IMG1 +* Test action 2: Create a keypair KEYP1 +* Test action 3: Create a server VM1 with IMG1 and KEYP1 +* **Test assertion 1:** Verify VM1 is created successfully +* Test action 4: Create a volume VOL1 +* **Test assertion 2:** Verify VOL1 is created successfully +* Test action 5: Attach VOL1 to VM1 +* **Test assertion 3:** Verify VOL1's status has been updated after attached to VM1 +* Test action 6: Create a floating IP FIP1 and assign FIP1 to VM1 +* **Test assertion 4:** Verify VM1's addresses have been refreshed after associating FIP1 +* Test action 7: Create and add security group SG1 to VM1 +* **Test assertion 5:** Verify can SSH to VM1 via FIP1 +* Test action 8: Reboot VM1 +* **Test assertion 6:** Verify can SSH to VM1 via FIP1 +* **Test assertion 7:** Verify VM1's disk count equals to 1 +* Test action 9: Delete the floating IP FIP1 from VM1 +* **Test assertion 8:** Verify VM1's addresses have been refreshed after disassociating FIP1 +* Test action 10: Delete SG1, IMG1, KEYP1, VOL1, VM1 and FIP1 + +Pass / fail criteria +'''''''''''''''''''' + +This test evaluates a minimum basic scenario. Specifically, the test verifies that: + +* The server can be connected before reboot. + +* The server can be connected after reboot. + +In order to pass this test, all test assertions listed in the test execution above need to pass. + +Post conditions +--------------- + +N/A + +---------------------------- +Test Case 2 - Cold migration +---------------------------- + +Test case specification +----------------------- + +tempest.scenario.test_network_advanced_server_ops.TestNetworkAdvancedServerOps.test_server_connectivity_cold_migration + +Test preconditions +------------------ + +* At least 2 compute nodes +* Nova, neutron services are available +* One public network + +Basic test flow execution description and pass/fail criteria +------------------------------------------------------------ + +Test execution +'''''''''''''' + +* Test action 1: Create a keypair KEYP1 +* Test action 2: Create a server VM1 with KEYP1 +* Test action 3: Create a floating IP FIP1 and assign FIP1 to VM1 +* Test action 4: Get VM1's host info SRC_HOST +* Test action 5: Wait for VM1 to reach 'ACTIVE' status +* **Test assertion 1:** Verify can ping FIP1 successfully and can SSH to VM1 via FIP1 +* Test action 6: Cold migrate VM1 +* Test action 7: Wait for VM1 to reach 'VERIFY_RESIZE' status +* Test action 8: Confirm resize VM1 +* Test action 9: Wait for VM1 to reach 'ACTIVE' status +* **Test assertion 2:** Verify can ping FIP1 successfully and can SSH to VM1 via FIP1 +* Test action 10: Get VM1's host info DST_HOST +* **Test assertion 3:** Verify SRC_HOST does not equal to DST_HOST +* Test action 11: Delete KEYP1, VM1 and FIP1 + +Pass / fail criteria +'''''''''''''''''''' + +This test evaluates the ability to cold migrate VMs. Specifically, the test verifies that: + +* Servers can be cold migrated from one compute node to another computer node. + +In order to pass this test, all test assertions listed in the test execution above need to pass. + +Post conditions +--------------- + +N/A + +----------------------------------- +Test Case 3 - Cold migration revert +----------------------------------- + +Test case specification +----------------------- + +tempest.scenario.test_network_advanced_server_ops.TestNetworkAdvancedServerOps.test_server_connectivity_cold_migration_revert + +Test preconditions +------------------ + +* At least 2 compute nodes +* Nova, neutron services are available +* One public network + +Basic test flow execution description and pass/fail criteria +------------------------------------------------------------ + +Test execution +'''''''''''''' + +* Test action 1: Create a keypair KEYP1 +* Test action 2: Create a server VM1 with KEYP1 +* Test action 3: Create a floating IP FIP1 and assign FIP1 to VM1 +* Test action 4: Get VM1's host info SRC_HOST +* Test action 5: Wait for VM1 to reach 'ACTIVE' status +* **Test assertion 1:** Verify can ping FIP1 successfully and can SSH to VM1 via FIP1 +* Test action 6: Cold migrate VM1 +* Test action 7: Wait for VM1 to reach 'VERIFY_RESIZE' status +* Test action 8: Revert resize VM1 +* Test action 9: Wait for VM1 to reach 'ACTIVE' status +* **Test assertion 2:** Verify can ping FIP1 successfully and can SSH to VM1 via FIP1 +* Test action 10: Get VM1's host info DST_HOST +* **Test assertion 3:** Verify SRC_HOST equals to DST_HOST +* Test action 11: Delete KEYP1, VM1 and FIP1 + +Pass / fail criteria +'''''''''''''''''''' + +This test evaluates the ability to revert cold-migrated VMs. Specifically, the test verifies that: + +* Cold migrate operation can be reverted. + +In order to pass this test, all test assertions listed in the test execution above need to pass. + +Post conditions +--------------- + +N/A + +-------------------------------------- +Test Case 4 - Pause and unpause server +-------------------------------------- + +Test case specification +----------------------- + +tempest.scenario.test_network_advanced_server_ops.TestNetworkAdvancedServerOps.test_server_connectivity_pause_unpause + +Test preconditions +------------------ + +* Nova, neutron services are available +* One public network + +Basic test flow execution description and pass/fail criteria +------------------------------------------------------------ + +Test execution +'''''''''''''' + +* Test action 1: Create a keypair KEYP1 +* Test action 2: Create a server VM1 with KEYP1 +* Test action 3: Create a floating IP FIP1 and assign FIP1 to VM1 +* Test action 4: Pause VM1 +* Test action 5: Wait for VM1 to reach 'PAUSED' status +* **Test assertion 1:** Verify FIP1 status is 'ACTIVE' +* **Test assertion 2:** Verify ping FIP1 failed and SSH to VM1 via FIP1 failed +* Test action 6: Unpause VM1 +* Test action 7: Wait for VM1 to reach 'ACTIVE' status +* **Test assertion 3:** Verify can ping FIP1 successfully and can SSH to VM1 via FIP1 +* Test action 8: Delete KEYP1, VM1 and FIP1 + +Pass / fail criteria +'''''''''''''''''''' + +This test evaluates the ability to pause and unpause VMs. Specifically, the test verifies that: + +* When paused, servers cannot be reached. + +* When unpaused, servers can recover its reachability. + +In order to pass this test, all test assertions listed in the test execution above need to pass. + +Post conditions +--------------- + +N/A + +--------------------------- +Test Case 5 - Reboot server +--------------------------- + +Test case specification +----------------------- + +tempest.scenario.test_network_advanced_server_ops.TestNetworkAdvancedServerOps.test_server_connectivity_reboot + +Test preconditions +------------------ + +* Nova, neutron services are available +* One public network + +Basic test flow execution description and pass/fail criteria +------------------------------------------------------------ + +Test execution +'''''''''''''' + +* Test action 1: Create a keypair KEYP1 +* Test action 2: Create a server VM1 with KEYP1 +* Test action 3: Create a floating IP FIP1 and assign FIP1 to VM1 +* Test action 4: Soft reboot VM1 +* Test action 5: Wait for VM1 to reach 'ACTIVE' status +* **Test assertion 1:** Verify can ping FIP1 successfully and can SSH to VM1 via FIP1 +* Test action 6: Delete KEYP1, VM1 and FIP1 + +Pass / fail criteria +'''''''''''''''''''' + +This test evaluates the ability to reboot servers. Specifically, the test verifies that: + +* After reboot, servers can still be connected. + +In order to pass this test, all test assertions listed in the test execution above need to pass. + +Post conditions +--------------- + +N/A + +---------------------------- +Test Case 6 - Rebuild server +---------------------------- + +Test case specification +----------------------- + +tempest.scenario.test_network_advanced_server_ops.TestNetworkAdvancedServerOps.test_server_connectivity_rebuild + +Test preconditions +------------------ + +* Nova, neutron services are available +* One public network + +Basic test flow execution description and pass/fail criteria +------------------------------------------------------------ + +Test execution +'''''''''''''' + +* Test action 1: Create a keypair KEYP1 +* Test action 2: Create a server VM1 with KEYP1 +* Test action 3: Create a floating IP FIP1 and assign FIP1 to VM1 +* Test action 4: Rebuild VM1 with another image +* Test action 5: Wait for VM1 to reach 'ACTIVE' status +* **Test assertion 1:** Verify can ping FIP1 successfully and can SSH to VM1 via FIP1 +* Test action 6: Delete KEYP1, VM1 and FIP1 + +Pass / fail criteria +'''''''''''''''''''' + +This test evaluates the ability to rebuild servers. Specifically, the test verifies that: + +* Servers can be rebuilt with specific image correctly. + +In order to pass this test, all test assertions listed in the test execution above need to pass. + +Post conditions +--------------- + +N/A + +--------------------------- +Test Case 7 - Resize server +--------------------------- + +Test case specification +----------------------- + +tempest.scenario.test_network_advanced_server_ops.TestNetworkAdvancedServerOps.test_server_connectivity_resize + +Test preconditions +------------------ + +* Nova, neutron services are available +* One public network + +Basic test flow execution description and pass/fail criteria +------------------------------------------------------------ + +Test execution +'''''''''''''' + +* Test action 1: Create a keypair KEYP1 +* Test action 2: Create a server VM1 with KEYP1 +* Test action 3: Create a floating IP FIP1 and assign FIP1 to VM1 +* Test action 4: Resize VM1 with another flavor +* Test action 5: Wait for VM1 to reach 'VERIFY_RESIZE' status +* Test action 6: Confirm resize VM1 +* Test action 7: Wait for VM1 to reach 'ACTIVE' status +* **Test assertion 1:** Verify can ping FIP1 successfully and can SSH to VM1 via FIP1 +* Test action 8: Delete KEYP1, VM1 and FIP1 + +Pass / fail criteria +'''''''''''''''''''' + +This test evaluates the ability to resize servers. Specifically, the test verifies that: + +* Servers can be resized with specific flavor correctly. + +In order to pass this test, all test assertions listed in the test execution above need to pass. + +Post conditions +--------------- + +N/A + +----------------------------------- +Test Case 8 - Stop and start server +----------------------------------- + +Test case specification +----------------------- + +tempest.scenario.test_network_advanced_server_ops.TestNetworkAdvancedServerOps.test_server_connectivity_stop_start + +Test preconditions +------------------ + +* Nova, neutron services are available +* One public network + +Basic test flow execution description and pass/fail criteria +------------------------------------------------------------ + +Test execution +'''''''''''''' + +* Test action 1: Create a keypair KEYP1 +* Test action 2: Create a server VM1 with KEYP1 +* Test action 3: Create a floating IP FIP1 and assign FIP1 to VM1 +* Test action 4: Stop VM1 +* Test action 5: Wait for VM1 to reach 'SHUTOFF' status +* **Test assertion 1:** Verify ping FIP1 failed and SSH to VM1 via FIP1 failed +* Test action 6: Start VM1 +* Test action 7: Wait for VM1 to reach 'ACTIVE' status +* **Test assertion 2:** Verify can ping FIP1 successfully and can SSH to VM1 via FIP1 +* Test action 8: Delete KEYP1, VM1 and FIP1 + +Pass / fail criteria +'''''''''''''''''''' + +This test evaluates the ability to stop and start servers. Specifically, the test verifies that: + +* When stopped, servers cannot be reached. + +* When started, servers can recover its reachability. + +In order to pass this test, all test assertions listed in the test execution above need to pass. + +Post conditions +--------------- + +N/A + +--------------------------------------- +Test Case 9 - Suspend and resume server +--------------------------------------- + +Test case specification +----------------------- + +tempest.scenario.test_network_advanced_server_ops.TestNetworkAdvancedServerOps.test_server_connectivity_suspend_resume + +Test preconditions +------------------ + +* Nova, neutron services are available +* One public network + +Basic test flow execution description and pass/fail criteria +------------------------------------------------------------ + +Test execution +'''''''''''''' + +* Test action 1: Create a keypair KEYP1 +* Test action 2: Create a server VM1 with KEYP1 +* Test action 3: Create a floating IP FIP1 and assign FIP1 to VM1 +* Test action 4: Suspend VM1 +* Test action 5: Wait for VM1 to reach 'SUSPENDED' status +* **Test assertion 1:** Verify ping FIP1 failed and SSH to VM1 via FIP1 failed +* Test action 6: Resume VM1 +* Test action 7: Wait for VM1 to reach 'ACTIVE' status +* **Test assertion 2:** Verify can ping FIP1 successfully and can SSH to VM1 via FIP1 +* Test action 8: Delete KEYP1, VM1 and FIP1 + +Pass / fail criteria +'''''''''''''''''''' + +This test evaluates the ability to suspend and resume servers. Specifically, the test verifies that: + +* When suspended, servers cannot be reached. + +* When resumed, servers can recover its reachability. + +In order to pass this test, all test assertions listed in the test execution above need to pass. + +Post conditions +--------------- + +N/A + +---------------------------------------------------- +Test Case 10 - Suspend and resume server in sequence +---------------------------------------------------- + +Test case specification +----------------------- + +tempest.scenario.test_server_advanced_ops.TestServerAdvancedOps.test_server_sequence_suspend_resume + +Test preconditions +------------------ + +* Nova, neutron services are available +* One public network + +Basic test flow execution description and pass/fail criteria +------------------------------------------------------------ + +Test execution +'''''''''''''' + +* Test action 1: Create a server VM1 +* Test action 2: Suspend VM1 +* Test action 3: Wait for VM1 to reach 'SUSPENDED' status +* **Test assertion 1:** Verify VM1's status is 'SUSPENDED' +* Test action 4: Resume VM1 +* Test action 5: Wait for VM1 to reach 'ACTIVE' status +* **Test assertion 2:** Verify VM1's status is 'ACTIVE' +* Test action 6: Suspend VM1 +* Test action 7: Wait for VM1 to reach 'SUSPENDED' status +* **Test assertion 3:** Verify VM1 status is 'SUSPENDED' +* Test action 8: Resume VM1 +* Test action 9: Wait for VM1 to reach 'ACTIVE' status +* **Test assertion 4:** Verify VM1 status is 'ACTIVE' +* Test action 10: Delete KEYP1, VM1 and FIP1 + +Pass / fail criteria +'''''''''''''''''''' + +This test evaluates the ability to suspend and resume servers in sequence. +Specifically, the test verifies that: + +* Servers can be suspend and resume in sequence correctly. + +In order to pass this test, all test assertions listed in the test execution above need to pass. + +Post conditions +--------------- + +N/A + +------------------------------------------ +Test Case 11 - Resize volume backed server +------------------------------------------ + +Test case specification +----------------------- + +tempest.scenario.test_server_advanced_ops.TestServerAdvancedOps.test_resize_volume_backed_server_confirm + +Test preconditions +------------------ + +* Nova, neutron, cinder services are available +* One public network + +Basic test flow execution description and pass/fail criteria +------------------------------------------------------------ + +Test execution +'''''''''''''' + +* Test action 1: Create a volume backed server VM1 +* Test action 2: Resize VM1 with another flavor +* Test action 3: Wait for VM1 to reach 'VERIFY_RESIZE' status +* Test action 4: Confirm resize VM1 +* Test action 5: Wait for VM1 to reach 'ACTIVE' status +* **Test assertion 1:** VM1's status is 'ACTIVE' +* Test action 6: Delete VM1 + +Pass / fail criteria +'''''''''''''''''''' + +This test evaluates the ability to resize volume backed servers. +Specifically, the test verifies that: + +* Volume backed servers can be resized with specific flavor correctly. + +In order to pass this test, all test assertions listed in the test execution above need to pass. + +Post conditions +--------------- + +N/A + +----------------------------------------- +Test Case 12 - Shelve and unshelve server +----------------------------------------- + +Test case specification +----------------------- + +tempest.scenario.test_shelve_instance.TestShelveInstance.test_shelve_instance + +Test preconditions +------------------ + +* Nova, neutron, image services are available +* One public network + +Basic test flow execution description and pass/fail criteria +------------------------------------------------------------ + +Test execution +'''''''''''''' + +* Test action 1: Create a keypair KEYP1 +* Test action 2: Create a security group SG1, which has rules for allowing + incoming SSH and ICMP traffic +* Test action 3: Create a server with SG1 and KEYP1 +* Test action 4: Create a timestamp and store it in a file F1 inside VM1 +* Test action 5: Shelve VM1 +* Test action 6: Unshelve VM1 +* Test action 7: Wait for VM1 to reach 'ACTIVE' status +* Test action 8: Read F1 and compare if the read value and the previously written value + are the same or not +* **Test assertion 1:** Verify the values written and read are the same +* Test action 9: Delete SG1, KEYP1 and VM1 + +Pass / fail criteria +'''''''''''''''''''' + +This test evaluates the ability to shelve and unshelve servers. +Specifically, the test verifies that: + +* Servers can be shelved and unshelved correctly. + +In order to pass this test, all test assertions listed in the test execution above need to pass. + +Post conditions +--------------- + +N/A + +------------------------------------------------------- +Test Case 13 - Shelve and unshelve volume backed server +------------------------------------------------------- + +Test case specification +----------------------- + +tempest.scenario.test_shelve_instance.TestShelveInstance.test_shelve_volume_backed_instance + +Test preconditions +------------------ + +* Nova, neutron, image, cinder services are available +* One public network + +Basic test flow execution description and pass/fail criteria +------------------------------------------------------------ + +Test execution +'''''''''''''' + +* Test action 1: Create a keypair KEYP1 +* Test action 2: Create a security group SG1, which has rules for allowing + incoming and outgoing SSH and ICMP traffic +* Test action 3: Create a volume backed server VM1 with SG1 and KEYP1 +* Test action 4: SSH to VM1 to create a timestamp T_STAMP1 and store it in a file F1 inside VM1 +* Test action 5: Shelve VM1 +* Test action 6: Unshelve VM1 +* Test action 7: Wait for VM1 to reach 'ACTIVE' status +* Test action 8: SSH to VM1 to read the timestamp T_STAMP2 stored in F1 +* **Test assertion 1:** Verify T_STAMP1 equals to T_STAMP2 +* Test action 9: Delete SG1, KEYP1 and VM1 + +Pass / fail criteria +'''''''''''''''''''' + +This test evaluates the ability to shelve and unshelve volume backed servers. +Specifically, the test verifies that: + +* Volume backed servers can be shelved and unshelved correctly. + +In order to pass this test, all test assertions listed in the test execution above need to pass. + +Post conditions +--------------- + +N/A diff --git a/docs/testing/user/testspecification/multiplenodes/index.rst b/docs/testing/user/testspecification/multiplenodes/index.rst new file mode 100644 index 00000000..72a131a3 --- /dev/null +++ b/docs/testing/user/testspecification/multiplenodes/index.rst @@ -0,0 +1,370 @@ +.. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. +.. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 +.. (c) Huawei Technologies Co.,Ltd + +=========================================================== +VM Resource Scheduling on Multiple Nodes test specification +=========================================================== + +.. toctree:: + :maxdepth: 2 + +Scope +===== + +The VM resource scheduling test area evaluates the ability of the system under +test to support VM resource scheduling on multiple nodes. +The tests in this test area will evaluate capabilities to schedule VM to multiple +compute nodes directly with scheduler hints, and create server groups with policy +affinity and anti-affinity. + +References +========== + +- Availability zone + + - https://docs.openstack.org/newton/networking-guide/config-az.html + +- Scheduling + + - https://docs.openstack.org/kilo/config-reference/content/section_compute-scheduler.html + +Definitions and abbreviations +============================= + +The following terms and abbreviations are used in conjunction with this test area + +- API - Application Programming Interface +- NFVi - Network Functions Virtualization infrastructure +- VIM - Virtual Infrastructure Manager +- VM - Virtual Machine + +System Under Test (SUT) +======================= + +The system under test is assumed to be the NFVi and VIM in operation on a +Pharos compliant infrastructure. + +Test Area Structure +=================== + +The test area is structured based on server group operations and server operations +on multiple nodes. Each test case is able to run independently, i.e. irrelevant of +the state created by a previous test. Specifically, every test performs clean-up +operations which return the system to the same state as before the test. + +Test Descriptions +================= + +API Used and Reference +---------------------- + +Security Groups: https://developer.openstack.org/api-ref/network/v2/index.html#security-groups-security-groups + +- create security group +- delete security group + +Networks: https://developer.openstack.org/api-ref/networking/v2/index.html#networks + +- create network +- delete network + +Routers and interface: https://developer.openstack.org/api-ref/networking/v2/index.html#routers-routers + +- create router +- delete router +- add interface to router + +Subnets: https://developer.openstack.org/api-ref/networking/v2/index.html#subnets + +- create subnet +- delete subnet + +Servers: https://developer.openstack.org/api-ref/compute/ + +- create keypair +- create server +- show server +- delete server +- add/assign floating IP +- create server group +- delete server group +- list server groups +- show server group details + +Ports: https://developer.openstack.org/api-ref/networking/v2/index.html#ports + +- create port +- delete port + +Floating IPs: https://developer.openstack.org/api-ref/networking/v2/index.html#floating-ips-floatingips + +- create floating IP +- delete floating IP + +Availability zone: https://developer.openstack.org/api-ref/compute/ + +- get availability zone + +------------------------------------------ +Test Case 1 - Schedule VM to compute nodes +------------------------------------------ + +Test case specification +----------------------- + +tempest.scenario.test_server_multinode.TestServerMultinode.test_schedule_to_all_nodes + +Test preconditions +------------------ + +* At least 2 compute nodes +* Openstack nova, neutron services are available +* One public network + +Basic test flow execution description and pass/fail criteria +------------------------------------------------------------ + +Test execution +'''''''''''''' + +* Test action 1: Get all availability zones AZONES1 in the SUT +* Test action 2: Get all compute nodes in AZONES1 +* Test action 3: Get the value of 'min_compute_nodes' which is set by user in tempest + config file and means the minimum number of compute nodes expected +* **Test assertion 1:** Verify that SUT has at least as many compute nodes as + specified by the 'min_compute_nodes' threshold +* Test action 4: Create one server for each compute node, up to the 'min_compute_nodes' threshold +* **Test assertion 2:** Verify the number of servers matches the 'min_compute_nodes' threshold +* Test action 5: Get every server's 'hostId' and store them in a set which has no duplicate values +* **Test assertion 3:** Verify the length of the set equals to the number of servers to ensure + that every server ended up on a different host +* Test action 6: Delete the created servers + +Pass / fail criteria +'''''''''''''''''''' + +This test evaluates the functionality of VM resource scheduling. +Specifically, the test verifies that: + +* VMs are scheduled to the requested compute nodes correctly. + +In order to pass this test, all test assertions listed in the test execution above need to pass. + +Post conditions +--------------- + +N/A + +------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- +Test Case 2 - Test create and delete multiple server groups with same name and policy +------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- + +Test case specification +----------------------- + +tempest.api.compute.servers.test_server_group.ServerGroupTestJSON.test_create_delete_multiple_server_groups_with_same_name_policy + +Test preconditions +------------------ + +None + +Basic test flow execution description and pass/fail criteria +------------------------------------------------------------ + +Test execution +'''''''''''''' + +* Test action 1: Generate a random name N1 +* Test action 2: Create a server group SERG1 with N1 and policy affinity +* Test action 3: Create another server group SERG2 with N1 and policy affinity +* **Test assertion 1:** The names of SERG1 and SERG2 are the same +* **Test assertion 2:** The 'policies' of SERG1 and SERG2 are the same +* **Test assertion 3:** The ids of SERG1 and SERG2 are different +* Test action 4: Delete SERG1 and SERG2 +* Test action 5: List all server groups +* **Test assertion 4:** SERG1 and SERG2 are not in the list + +Pass / fail criteria +'''''''''''''''''''' + +This test evaluates the functionality of creating and deleting server groups with the same name and policy. +Specifically, the test verifies that: + +* Server groups can be created with the same name and policy. +* Server groups with the same name and policy can be deleted successfully. + +In order to pass this test, all test assertions listed in the test execution above need to pass. + +Post conditions +--------------- + +N/A + +---------------------------------------------------------------------- +Test Case 3 - Test create and delete server group with affinity policy +---------------------------------------------------------------------- + +Test case specification +----------------------- + +tempest.api.compute.servers.test_server_group.ServerGroupTestJSON.test_create_delete_server_group_with_affinity_policy + +Test preconditions +------------------ + +None + +Basic test flow execution description and pass/fail criteria +------------------------------------------------------------ + +Test execution +'''''''''''''' + +* Test action 1: Generate a random name N1 +* Test action 2: Create a server group SERG1 with N1 and policy affinity +* **Test assertion 1:** The name of SERG1 returned in the response is the same as N1 +* **Test assertion 2:** The 'policies' of SERG1 returned in the response is affinity +* Test action 3: Delete SERG1 and list all server groups +* **Test assertion 3:** SERG1 is not in the list + +Pass / fail criteria +'''''''''''''''''''' + +This test evaluates the functionality of creating and deleting server group with affinity policy. +Specifically, the test verifies that: + +* Server group can be created with affinity policy and deleted successfully. + +In order to pass this test, all test assertions listed in the test execution above need to pass. + +Post conditions +--------------- + +N/A + +--------------------------------------------------------------------------- +Test Case 4 - Test create and delete server group with anti-affinity policy +--------------------------------------------------------------------------- + +Test case specification +----------------------- + +tempest.api.compute.servers.test_server_group.ServerGroupTestJSON.test_create_delete_server_group_with_anti_affinity_policy + +Test preconditions +------------------ + +None + +Basic test flow execution description and pass/fail criteria +------------------------------------------------------------ + +Test execution +'''''''''''''' + +* Test action 1: Generate a random name N1 +* Test action 2: Create a server group SERG1 with N1 and policy anti-affinity +* **Test assertion 1:** The name of SERG1 returned in the response is the same as N1 +* **Test assertion 2:** The 'policies' of SERG1 returned in the response is anti-affinity +* Test action 3: Delete SERG1 and list all server groups +* **Test assertion 3:** SERG1 is not in the list + +Pass / fail criteria +'''''''''''''''''''' + +This test evaluates the functionality of creating and deleting server group with anti-affinity policy. +Specifically, the test verifies that: + +* Server group can be created with anti-affinity policy and deleted successfully. + +In order to pass this test, all test assertions listed in the test execution above need to pass. + +Post conditions +--------------- + +N/A + +------------------------------------- +Test Case 5 - Test list server groups +------------------------------------- + +Test case specification +----------------------- + +tempest.api.compute.servers.test_server_group.ServerGroupTestJSON.test_list_server_groups + +Test preconditions +------------------ + +None + +Basic test flow execution description and pass/fail criteria +------------------------------------------------------------ + +Test execution +'''''''''''''' + +* Test action 1: Generate a random name N1 +* Test action 2: Create a server group SERG1 with N1 and policy affinity +* Test action 3: List all server groups +* **Test assertion 1:** SERG1 is in the list +* Test action 4: Delete SERG1 + +Pass / fail criteria +'''''''''''''''''''' + +This test evaluates the functionality of listing server groups. +Specifically, the test verifies that: + +* Server groups can be listed successfully. + +In order to pass this test, all test assertions listed in the test execution above need to pass. + +Post conditions +--------------- + +N/A + +-------------------------------------------- +Test Case 6 - Test show server group details +-------------------------------------------- + +Test case specification +----------------------- + +tempest.api.compute.servers.test_server_group.ServerGroupTestJSON.test_show_server_group + +Test preconditions +------------------ + +None + +Basic test flow execution description and pass/fail criteria +------------------------------------------------------------ + +Test execution +'''''''''''''' + +* Test action 1: Generate a random name N1 +* Test action 2: Create a server group SERG1 with N1 and policy affinity, and stored + the details (D1) returned in the response +* Test action 3: Show the details (D2) of SERG1 +* **Test assertion 1:** All values in D1 are the same as the values in D2 +* Test action 4: Delete SERG1 + +Pass / fail criteria +'''''''''''''''''''' + +This test evaluates the functionality of showing server group details. +Specifically, the test verifies that: + +* Server groups can be shown successfully. + +In order to pass this test, all test assertions listed in the test execution above need to pass. + +Post conditions +--------------- + +N/A diff --git a/docs/testing/user/testspecification/old_files/ipv6/designspecification.rst b/docs/testing/user/testspecification/old_files/ipv6/designspecification.rst deleted file mode 100644 index 9e403472..00000000 --- a/docs/testing/user/testspecification/old_files/ipv6/designspecification.rst +++ /dev/null @@ -1,133 +0,0 @@ -.. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. -.. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 -.. (c) Christopher Price (Ericsson AB) and others - -============================== -IPv6 test design specification -============================== - -This document outlines the approach and method for testing IPv6 in the OPNFV compliance test -suite. Providing a brief outline of the features to be tested, the methodology for testing, -schema's and criteria. - -Features to be tested -===================== - -The IPv6 compliance test plan outlines the method for testing IPv6 compliance to the OPNFV -platform behaviours and features of IPv6 enabled VNFi platforms. The specific features to -be tested by the IPv6 compliance test suite is outlined in the following table. - -.. table:: - :class: longtable - -+-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ -|Features / Requirements |Tests available | Test Cases | -+===========================================================+===================+====================================================================+ -|All topologies work in a multi-tenant environment |No | | -| | | | -| | | | -| | | | -| | | | -| | | | -+-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ -|IPv6 VM to VM only |No | | -| | | | -| | | | -+-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ -|IPv6 external L2 VLAN directly attached to a VM |No | | -| | | | -+-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ -|IPv6 subnet routed via L3 agent to an external IPv6 network|No | | -| | | | -|1. Both VLAN and overlay (e.g. GRE, VXLAN) subnet attached | | | -| to VMs; | | | -|2. Must be able to support multiple L3 agents for a given | | | -| external network to support scaling (neutron scheduler | | | -| to assign vRouters to the L3 agents) | | | -+-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ -|Ability for a NIC to support both IPv4 and IPv6 (dual |No | | -|stack) address. | | | -| | | | -|1. VM with a single interface associated with a network, | | | -| which is then associated with two subnets. | | | -|2. VM with two different interfaces associated with two | | | -| different networks and two different subnets. | | | -+-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ -|Support IPv6 Address assignment modes. |No | | -| | | | -|1. SLAAC | | | -|2. DHCPv6 Stateless | | | -|3. DHCPv6 Stateful | | | -+-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ -|Ability to create a port on an IPv6 DHCPv6 Stateful subnet |No | | -|and assign a specific IPv6 address to the port and have it | | | -|taken out of the DHCP address pool. | | | -+-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ -|Full support for IPv6 matching (i.e., IPv6, ICMPv6, TCP, |No | | -|UDP) in security groups. Ability to control and manage all | | | -|IPv6 security group capabilities via Neutron/Nova API (REST| | | -|and CLI) as well as via Horizon. | | | -+-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ -|During network/subnet/router create, there should be an |No | | -|option to allow user to specify the type of address | | | -|management they would like. This includes all options | | | -|including those low priority if implemented (e.g., toggle | | | -|on/off router and address prefix advertisements); It must | | | -|be supported via Neutron API (REST and CLI) as well as via | | | -|Horizon | | | -+-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ -|Security groups anti-spoofing: Prevent VM from using a |No | | -|source IPv6/MAC address which is not assigned to the VM | | | -+-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ -|Protect tenant and provider network from rogue RAs |No | | -| | | | -| | | | -| | | | -| | | | -| | | | -+-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ -|Support the ability to assign multiple IPv6 addresses to |No | | -|an interface; both for Neutron router interfaces and VM | | | -|interfaces. | | | -+-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ -|Ability for a VM to support a mix of multiple IPv4 and IPv6|No | | -|networks, including multiples of the same type. | | | -+-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ -|Support for IPv6 Prefix Delegation. |No | | -+-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ -|IPv6 First-Hop Security, IPv6 ND spoofing |No | | -+-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ -|IPv6 support in Neutron Layer3 High Availability |No | | -|(keepalived+VRRP). | | | -+-----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ - - -Test approach for IPv6 -====================== - -The most common approach for testing IPv6 capabilities in the test suite is through interaction with the SUT control plane. -In this instance the test framework will exercise the NBI provided by the VIM to configure and leverage IPv6 related features -in the platform, instantiate workloads, and invoke behaviours in the platform. The suite may also interact directly with the -data plane to exercise platform capabilities and further invoke helper functions on the platform for the same purpose. - -Test result analysis --------------------- - -All functional tests in the IPv6 test suite will provide a pass/fail result on completion of the test. In addition test logs -and relevant additional information will be provided as part of the test log, available on test suite completion. - -Some tests in the compliance suite measure such metrics as latency and performance. At this time these tests are intended to -provide a feature based pass/fail metric not related to system performance. -These tests may however provide detailed results of performance and latency in the 'test report'_ document. - -Test identification -=================== - -TBD: WE need to identify the test naming scheme we will use in DoveTail in order that we can cross reference to the test -projects and maintain our suite effectively. This naming scheme needs to be externally relevant to non-OPNFV consumers and as -such some consideration is required on the selection. - -Pass Fail Criteria -================== - -This section requires some further work with the test teams to identify how and where we generate, store and provide results. diff --git a/docs/testing/user/testspecification/old_files/ipv6/index.rst b/docs/testing/user/testspecification/old_files/ipv6/index.rst deleted file mode 100644 index a806d644..00000000 --- a/docs/testing/user/testspecification/old_files/ipv6/index.rst +++ /dev/null @@ -1,19 +0,0 @@ -.. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. -.. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 -.. (c) OPNFV - -******************************* -OPNFV IPv6 Compliance Test Plan -******************************* - -.. toctree:: - :maxdepth: 2 - - ./testplan.rst - ./testprocedure.rst - ./testspecification.rst - ./designspecification.rst - ./ipv6.tc001.specification.rst - ./ipv6.tc026.specification.rst - ./ipv6_all_testcases.rst - diff --git a/docs/testing/user/testspecification/old_files/ipv6/ipv6.tc001.specification.rst b/docs/testing/user/testspecification/old_files/ipv6/ipv6.tc001.specification.rst deleted file mode 100644 index 5afb2095..00000000 --- a/docs/testing/user/testspecification/old_files/ipv6/ipv6.tc001.specification.rst +++ /dev/null @@ -1,59 +0,0 @@ -.. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. -.. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 -.. (c) OPNFV - -================================================================================================== -Dovetail IPv6 tc001 specification - Bulk Creation and Deletion of IPv6 Networks, Ports and Subnets -================================================================================================== - - -+-----------------------+----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ -|test case name |Bulk creation and deletion of IPv6 networks, ports and subnets | -| | | -+-----------------------+----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ -|id |dovetail.ipv6.tc001 | -+-----------------------+----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ -|objective |To verify that platform is able to create/delete networks, ports and subnets in bulk operation | -+-----------------------+----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ -|test items |tempest.api.network.test_networks.BulkNetworkOpsIpV6Test.test_bulk_create_delete_network | -| |{idempotent_id('d4f9024d-1e28-4fc1-a6b1-25dbc6fa11e2')} | -| |tempest.api.network.test_networks.BulkNetworkOpsIpV6Test.test_bulk_create_delete_port | -| |{idempotent_id('48037ff2-e889-4c3b-b86a-8e3f34d2d060')} | -| |tempest.api.network.test_networks.BulkNetworkOpsIpV6Test.test_bulk_create_delete_subnet | -| |{idempotent_id('8936533b-c0aa-4f29-8e53-6cc873aec489')} | -+-----------------------+----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ -|environmental | | -|requirements & | environment can be deployed on bare metal of virtualized infrastructure | -|preconditions | deployment can be HA or non-HA | -| | | -+-----------------------+----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ -|scenario dependencies | NA | -+-----------------------+----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ -|procedural |Step 1: create/delete network: | -|requirements | create 2 networks in one request | -| | asserting that the networks are found in the list after creation | -| | | -| |Step 2: create/delete subnet: | -| | create 2 subnets in one request | -| | asserting that the subnets are found in the list after creation | -| | | -| |Step 3: create/delete port: | -| | create 2 ports in one request | -| | asserting that the ports are found in the list after creation | -| | | -+-----------------------+----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ -|input specifications |The parameters needed to execute Neutron network APIs. | -| |Refer to Neutron Networking API v2.0 `[1]`_ `[2]`_ | -+-----------------------+----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ -|output specifications |The responses after executing Network network APIs. | -| |Refer to Neutron Networking API v2.0 `[1]`_ `[2]`_ | -+-----------------------+----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ -|pass/fail criteria |If normal response code 200 is returned, the test passes. | -| |Otherwise, the test fails with various error codes. | -| |Refer to Neutron Networking API v2.0 `[1]`_ `[2]`_ | -+-----------------------+----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ -|test report |TBD | -+-----------------------+----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ - -.. _`[1]`: http://developer.openstack.org/api-ref/networking/v2/ -.. _`[2]`: http://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/APIv2-specification diff --git a/docs/testing/user/testspecification/old_files/ipv6/ipv6.tc026.specification.rst b/docs/testing/user/testspecification/old_files/ipv6/ipv6.tc026.specification.rst deleted file mode 100644 index e7fd82e7..00000000 --- a/docs/testing/user/testspecification/old_files/ipv6/ipv6.tc026.specification.rst +++ /dev/null @@ -1,54 +0,0 @@ -.. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. -.. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 -.. (c) OPNFV - -============================================================== -Dovetail IPv6 tc026 specification - Service VM as IPv6 vRouter -============================================================== - - -+-----------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+ -|test case name |Service VM as IPv6 vRouter | -| | | -+-----------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+ -|id |dovetail.ipv6.tc026 | -+-----------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+ -|objective |IPv6 connnectivity, service VM as IPv6 vRouter | -+-----------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+ -|modules under test |neutron, nova, etc | -+-----------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+ -|dependent test project |yardstick | -+-----------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+ -|test items |yardstick_tc027 | -+-----------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+ -|environmental | OpenStack-only environment | -|requirements & | environment can be deplyed on bare metal of virtualized infrastructure | -|preconditions | deployment can be HA or non-HA | -| | test case image needs to be installed into Glance with ping6 included | -+-----------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+ -|scenario dependencies | nosdn | -+-----------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+ -|procedural |step 1: to setup IPv6 testing environment | -|requirements | 1.1 disable security group | -| | 1.2 create (ipv6, ipv4) router, network and subnet | -| | 1.3 create vRouter, VM1, VM2 | -| |step 2: to run ping6 to verify IPv6 connectivity | -| | 2.1 ssh to VM1 | -| | 2.2 ping6 to ipv6 router from VM1 | -| | 2.3 get the result and store the logs | -| |step 3: to teardown IPv6 testing environment | -| | 3.1 delete vRouter, VM1, VM2 | -| | 3.2 delete (ipv6, ipv4) router, network and subnet | -| | 3.3 enable security group | -+-----------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+ -|input specifications |packetsize: 56 | -| |ping_count: 5 | -| | | -+-----------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+ -|output specifications |output includes max_rtt, min_rtt, average_rtt | -+-----------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+ -|pass/fail criteria |ping6 connectivity success, no SLA | -+-----------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+ -|test report | dovetail dashboard DB here | -+-----------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+ - diff --git a/docs/testing/user/testspecification/old_files/ipv6/ipv6_all_testcases.rst b/docs/testing/user/testspecification/old_files/ipv6/ipv6_all_testcases.rst deleted file mode 100644 index 02115ec3..00000000 --- a/docs/testing/user/testspecification/old_files/ipv6/ipv6_all_testcases.rst +++ /dev/null @@ -1,243 +0,0 @@ -.. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. -.. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 -.. (c) OPNFV - -================================================== -IPv6 Compliance Testing Methodology and Test Cases -================================================== - -IPv6 Compliance Testing focuses on overlay IPv6 capabilities, i.e. to validate that -IPv6 capability is supported in tenant networks, subnets and routers. Both Tempest API -testing and Tempest Scenario testing are reused as much as we can in IPv6 Compliance -Testing. In addition, Yardstick Test Case 027 is also used to validate a specific use case -of using a Service VM as an IPv6 vRouter. - -IPv6 Compliance Testing test cases are described as follows: - ---------------------------------------------------------------- -Test Case 1: Create and Delete an IPv6 Network, Port and Subnet ---------------------------------------------------------------- - -.. code-block:: bash - - tempest.api.network.test_networks.BulkNetworkOpsIpV6Test.test_bulk_create_delete_network - tempest.api.network.test_networks.BulkNetworkOpsIpV6Test.test_bulk_create_delete_port - tempest.api.network.test_networks.BulkNetworkOpsIpV6Test.test_bulk_create_delete_subnet - ------------------------------------------------------------------ -Test Case 2: Create, Update and Delete an IPv6 Network and Subnet ------------------------------------------------------------------ - -.. code-block:: bash - - tempest.api.network.test_networks.NetworksIpV6Test.test_create_update_delete_network_subnet - ----------------------------------------------- -Test Case 3: Check External Network Visibility ----------------------------------------------- - -.. code-block:: bash - - tempest.api.network.test_networks.NetworksIpV6Test.test_external_network_visibility - -------------------------------------------------------- -Test Case 4: List IPv6 Networks and Subnets of a Tenant -------------------------------------------------------- - -.. code-block:: bash - - tempest.api.network.test_networks.NetworksIpV6Test.test_list_networks - tempest.api.network.test_networks.NetworksIpV6Test.test_list_subnets - ------------------------------------------------------------ -Test Case 5: Show Information of an IPv6 Network and Subnet ------------------------------------------------------------ - -.. code-block:: bash - - tempest.api.network.test_networks.NetworksIpV6Test.test_show_network - tempest.api.network.test_networks.NetworksIpV6Test.test_show_subnet - ------------------------------------------------------------- -Test Case 6: Create an IPv6 Port in Allowed Allocation Pools ------------------------------------------------------------- - -.. code-block:: bash - - tempest.api.network.test_ports.PortsIpV6TestJSON.test_create_port_in_allowed_allocation_pools - --------------------------------------------------------- -Test Case 7: Create an IPv6 Port without Security Groups --------------------------------------------------------- - -.. code-block:: bash - - tempest.api.network.test_ports.PortsIpV6TestJSON.test_create_port_with_no_securitygroups - ---------------------------------------------------- -Test Case 8: Create, Update and Delete an IPv6 Port ---------------------------------------------------- - -.. code-block:: bash - - tempest.api.network.test_ports.PortsIpV6TestJSON.test_create_update_delete_port - ----------------------------------------- -Test Case 9: List IPv6 Ports of a Tenant ----------------------------------------- - -.. code-block:: bash - - tempest.api.network.test_ports.PortsIpV6TestJSON.test_list_ports - ----------------------------------------------- -Test Case 10: Show Information of an IPv6 Port ----------------------------------------------- - -.. code-block:: bash - - tempest.api.network.test_ports.PortsIpV6TestJSON.test_show_port - --------------------------------------------------------- -Test Case 11: Add Multiple Interfaces for an IPv6 Router --------------------------------------------------------- - -.. code-block:: bash - - tempest.api.network.test_routers.RoutersIpV6Test.test_add_multiple_router_interfaces - ------------------------------------------------------------------- -Test Case 12: Add and Remove an IPv6 Router Interface with port_id ------------------------------------------------------------------- - -.. code-block:: bash - - tempest.api.network.test_routers.RoutersIpV6Test.test_add_remove_router_interface_with_port_id - --------------------------------------------------------------------- -Test Case 13: Add and Remove an IPv6 Router Interface with subnet_id --------------------------------------------------------------------- - -.. code-block:: bash - - tempest.api.network.test_routers.RoutersIpV6Test.test_add_remove_router_interface_with_subnet_id - ------------------------------------------------------------------- -Test Case 14: Create, Update, Delete, List and Show an IPv6 Router ------------------------------------------------------------------- - -.. code-block:: bash - - tempest.api.network.test_routers.RoutersIpV6Test.test_create_show_list_update_delete_router - --------------------------------------------------------------------------- -Test Case 15: Create, Update, Delete, List and Show an IPv6 Security Group --------------------------------------------------------------------------- - -.. code-block:: bash - - tempest.api.network.test_security_groups.SecGroupIPv6Test.test_create_list_update_show_delete_security_group - ----------------------------------------------------------- -Test Case 16: Create, Delete and Show Security Group Rules ----------------------------------------------------------- - -.. code-block:: bash - - tempest.api.network.test_security_groups.SecGroupIPv6Test.test_create_show_delete_security_group_rule - --------------------------------------- -Test Case 17: List All Security Groups --------------------------------------- - -.. code-block:: bash - - tempest.api.network.test_security_groups.SecGroupIPv6Test.test_list_security_groups - --------------------------------------------------------- -Test Case 18: IPv6 Address Assignment - DHCPv6 Stateless --------------------------------------------------------- - -.. code-block:: bash - - tempest.scenario.test_network_v6.TestGettingAddress.test_dhcp6_stateless_from_os - --------------------------------------------------------------------- -Test Case 19: IPv6 Address Assignment - Dual Stack, DHCPv6 Stateless --------------------------------------------------------------------- - -.. code-block:: bash - - tempest.scenario.test_network_v6.TestGettingAddress.test_dualnet_dhcp6_stateless_from_os - ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -Test Case 20: IPv6 Address Assignment - Multiple Prefixes, DHCPv6 Stateless ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- - -.. code-block:: bash - - tempest.scenario.test_network_v6.TestGettingAddress.test_multi_prefix_dhcpv6_stateless - ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -Test Case 21: IPv6 Address Assignment - Dual Stack, Multiple Prefixes, DHCPv6 Stateless ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - -.. code-block:: bash - - tempest.scenario.test_network_v6.TestGettingAddress.test_dualnet_multi_prefix_dhcpv6_stateless - ---------------------------------------------- -Test Case 22: IPv6 Address Assignment - SLAAC ---------------------------------------------- - -.. code-block:: bash - - tempest.scenario.test_network_v6.TestGettingAddress.test_slaac_from_os - ---------------------------------------------------------- -Test Case 23: IPv6 Address Assignment - Dual Stack, SLAAC ---------------------------------------------------------- - -.. code-block:: bash - - tempest.scenario.test_network_v6.TestGettingAddress.test_dualnet_slaac_from_os - ----------------------------------------------------------------- -Test Case 24: IPv6 Address Assignment - Multiple Prefixes, SLAAC ----------------------------------------------------------------- - -.. code-block:: bash - - tempest.scenario.test_network_v6.TestGettingAddress.test_multi_prefix_slaac - ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- -Test Case 25: IPv6 Address Assignment - Dual Stack, Multiple Prefixes, SLAAC ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- - -.. code-block:: bash - - tempest.scenario.test_network_v6.TestGettingAddress.test_dualnet_multi_prefix_slaac - -------------------------------------------- -Test Case 26: Service VM as an IPv6 vRouter -------------------------------------------- - -.. code-block:: bash - - # Refer to Yardstick Test Case 027 - # Instruction: http://artifacts.opnfv.org/ipv6/docs/configurationguide/index.html - # Step 1: Set up Service VM as an IPv6 vRouter - # 1.1: Install OPNFV and Preparation - # 1.2: Disable Security Groups in OpenStack ML2 Setup - # 1.3: Create IPv4 and IPv6 Neutron routers, networks and subnets - # 1.4: Boot vRouter VM, and Guest VM1 and Guest VM2 - # Step 2: Verify IPv6 Connectivity - # 2.1: ssh to Guest VM1 - # 2.2: Ping6 from Guest VM1 to Guest VM2 - # 2.3: Ping6 from Guest VM1 to vRouter VM - # 2.4: Ping6 from Guest VM1 to Neutron IPv6 Router Namespace - # Step 3: Tear down Setup - # 3.1: Delete Guest VM1, Guest VM2 and vRouter VM - # 3.2: Delete IPv4 and IPv6 Neutron routers, networks and subnets - # 3.3: Enable Security Groups - diff --git a/docs/testing/user/testspecification/old_files/ipv6/testplan.rst b/docs/testing/user/testspecification/old_files/ipv6/testplan.rst deleted file mode 100644 index 3470e7a6..00000000 --- a/docs/testing/user/testspecification/old_files/ipv6/testplan.rst +++ /dev/null @@ -1,34 +0,0 @@ -.. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. -.. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 -.. (c) OPNFV - -=============================== -OPNFV IPv6 Compliance Test Plan -=============================== - -Introduction -============ - -The IPv6 compliance test plan outlines the method for testing IPv6 Tenant Network feature -compliance with the OPNFV platform. - -Scope ------ - -This test, and other tests in the test suite, are designed to verify an entire SUT, -and not any individual component of the system. - -Test suite scope and procedures -=============================== - -The IPv6 compliance test suite will evaluate the ability for a SUT to support IPv6 -Tenant Network features and functionality provided by OPNFV platform. - -Please refer to the complete list of the test cases for details. - -Test suite execution -==================== - -Please refer to each test case for specific setup and execution procedure. - -.._[1]: http://www.opnfv.org diff --git a/docs/testing/user/testspecification/old_files/ipv6/testprocedure.rst b/docs/testing/user/testspecification/old_files/ipv6/testprocedure.rst deleted file mode 100644 index 2119ed61..00000000 --- a/docs/testing/user/testspecification/old_files/ipv6/testprocedure.rst +++ /dev/null @@ -1,9 +0,0 @@ -.. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. -.. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 -.. (c) Christopher Price (Ericsson AB) and others - -=================== -IPv6 test procedure -=================== - -Draft to be patched this week, someone feel free to work on this in parallel. diff --git a/docs/testing/user/testspecification/old_files/ipv6/testspecification.rst b/docs/testing/user/testspecification/old_files/ipv6/testspecification.rst deleted file mode 100644 index e51f2a5b..00000000 --- a/docs/testing/user/testspecification/old_files/ipv6/testspecification.rst +++ /dev/null @@ -1,57 +0,0 @@ -.. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. -.. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 -.. (c) Christopher Price (Ericsson AB) and others - -=============================================== -Test specification - Service VM as IPv6 vRouter -=============================================== - -Draft to be worked on, this represents the YardStick test but I would suggest we need to break -this into a set of tests which provide more details per action with boundary validation. - -Test Item -========= - -TBD -> IPv6 Ping... - -Identify the items or features to be tested by this test case. The item description and -definition can be referenced from any one of several sources, depending on the level of the -test case specification. It may be a good idea to reference the source documents as well. - -Environmental requirements -========================== - -For ipv6 Test Case 18-25, those test cases are scenario tests, they need to boot virtual -machines and ping6 in addition to test APIs, ping6 to vRouter is not supported by SDN controller -yet, such as Opendaylight (Boron and previous releases), so they are scenario dependent, -i.e., currently ipv6 Test Case 18-25 can only run on scenario os-nosdn-nofeature. - -Preconditions and procedural requirements -========================================= - -TBD - -.. <Start> -.. this section may be iterated over for a set of simillar test cases that would be run as one. - -Input Specifications -==================== - -TBD - -Output Specifications -===================== - -TBD - -.. <End> - -Test Reporting -============== - -The test report for this test case will be generated with links to relevant data sources. -This section can be updated once we have a template for the report in place. - -http://testresults.opnfv.org/grafana/dashboard/db/yardstick-tc027 - - diff --git a/docs/testing/user/testspecification/securitygroup/index.rst b/docs/testing/user/testspecification/securitygroup/index.rst new file mode 100644 index 00000000..0621b84d --- /dev/null +++ b/docs/testing/user/testspecification/securitygroup/index.rst @@ -0,0 +1,450 @@ +.. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. +.. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 +.. (c) Huawei Technologies Co.,Ltd + +=================================================== +Security Group and Port Security test specification +=================================================== + +.. toctree:: + :maxdepth: 2 + +Scope +===== + +The security group and port security test area evaluates the ability of the +system under test to support packet filtering by security group and port security. +The tests in this test area will evaluate preventing MAC spoofing by port security, +basic security group operations including testing cross/in tenant traffic, testing +multiple security groups, using port security to disable security groups and +updating security groups. + +References +========== + +N/A + +Definitions and abbreviations +============================= + +The following terms and abbreviations are used in conjunction with this test +area + +- API - Application Programming Interface +- ICMP - Internet Control Message Protocol +- MAC - Media Access Control +- NFVi - Network Functions Virtualization infrastructure +- SSH - Secure Shell +- TCP - Transmission Control Protocol +- VIM - Virtual Infrastructure Manager +- VM - Virtual Machine + +System Under Test (SUT) +======================= + +The system under test is assumed to be the NFVi and VIM in operation on a +Pharos compliant infrastructure. + +Test Area Structure +=================== + +The test area is structured based on the basic operations of security group and +port security. Each test case is able to run independently, i.e. irrelevant of +the state created by a previous test. Specifically, every test performs clean-up +operations which return the system to the same state as before the test. + +Test Descriptions +================= + +API Used and Reference +---------------------- + +Security Groups: https://developer.openstack.org/api-ref/network/v2/index.html#security-groups-security-groups + +- create security group +- delete security group + +Networks: https://developer.openstack.org/api-ref/networking/v2/index.html#networks + +- create network +- delete network +- list networks +- create floating ip +- delete floating ip + +Routers and interface: https://developer.openstack.org/api-ref/networking/v2/index.html#routers-routers + +- create router +- delete router +- list routers +- add interface to router + +Subnets: https://developer.openstack.org/api-ref/networking/v2/index.html#subnets + +- create subnet +- list subnets +- delete subnet + +Servers: https://developer.openstack.org/api-ref/compute/ + +- create keypair +- create server +- delete server +- add/assign floating ip + +Ports: https://developer.openstack.org/api-ref/networking/v2/index.html#ports + +- update port +- list ports +- show port details + +-------------------------------------------- +Test Case 1 - Port Security and MAC Spoofing +-------------------------------------------- + +Test case specification +----------------------- + +tempest.scenario.test_network_basic_ops.TestNetworkBasicOps.test_port_security_macspoofing_port + +Test preconditions +------------------ + +* Neutron port-security extension API +* Neutron security-group extension API +* One public network + +Basic test flow execution description and pass/fail criteria +------------------------------------------------------------ + +Test execution +'''''''''''''' + +* Test action 1: Create a security group SG1, which has rules for allowing incoming + SSH and ICMP traffic +* Test action 2: Create a neutron network NET1 +* Test action 3: Create a tenant router R1 which routes traffic to public network +* Test action 4: Create a subnet SUBNET1 and add it as router interface +* Test action 5: Create a server VM1 with SG1 and NET1, and assign a floating ip + FIP1 (via R1) to VM1 +* Test action 6: Verify can ping FIP1 successfully and can SSH to VM1 with FIP1 +* Test action 7: Create a second neutron network NET2 and subnet SUBNET2, and attach VM1 to NET2 +* Test action 8: Get VM1's ethernet interface NIC2 for NET2 +* Test action 9: Create second server VM2 on NET2 +* Test action 10: Verify VM1 is able to communicate with VM2 via NIC2 +* Test action 11: Login to VM1 and spoof the MAC address of NIC2 to "00:00:00:00:00:01" +* Test action 12: Verify VM1 fails to communicate with VM2 via NIC2 +* **Test assertion 1:** The ping operation is failed +* Test action 13: Update 'security_groups' to be none for VM1's NIC2 port +* Test action 14: Update 'port_security_enable' to be False for VM1's NIC2 port +* Test action 15: Verify now VM1 is able to communicate with VM2 via NIC2 +* **Test assertion 2:** The ping operation is successful +* Test action 16: Delete SG1, NET1, NET2, SUBNET1, SUBNET2, R1, VM1, VM2 and FIP1 + +Pass / fail criteria +'''''''''''''''''''' + +This test evaluates the ability to prevent MAC spoofing by using port security. +Specifically, the test verifies that: + +* With port security, the ICMP packets from a spoof server cannot pass the port. + +* Without port security, the ICMP packets from a spoof server can pass the port. + +In order to pass this test, all test assertions listed in the test execution above need to pass. + +Post conditions +--------------- + +N/A + +------------------------------------------------------ +Test Case 2 - Test Security Group Cross Tenant Traffic +------------------------------------------------------ + +Test case specification +----------------------- + +tempest.scenario.test_security_groups_basic_ops.TestSecurityGroupsBasicOps.test_cross_tenant_traffic + +Test preconditions +------------------ + +* Neutron security-group extension API +* Two tenants +* One public network + +Basic test flow execution description and pass/fail criteria +------------------------------------------------------------ + +Test execution +'''''''''''''' + +* Test action 1: Create a neutron network NET1 for primary tenant +* Test action 2: Create a primary tenant router R1 which routes traffic to public network +* Test action 3: Create a subnet SUBNET1 and add it as router interface +* Test action 4: Create 2 empty security groups SG1 and SG2 for primary tenant +* Test action 5: Add a tcp rule to SG1 +* Test action 6: Create a server VM1 with SG1, SG2 and NET1, and assign a floating ip + FIP1 (via R1) to VM1 +* Test action 7: Repeat test action 1 to 6 and create NET2, R2, SUBNET2, SG3, SG4, + FIP2 and VM2 for an alt_tenant +* Test action 8: Verify VM1 fails to communicate with VM2 through FIP2 +* **Test assertion 1:** The ping operation is failed +* Test action 9: Add ICMP rule to SG4 +* Test action 10: Verify VM1 is able to communicate with VM2 through FIP2 +* **Test assertion 2:** The ping operation is successful +* Test action 11: Verify VM2 fails to communicate with VM1 through FIP1 +* **Test assertion 3:** The ping operation is failed +* Test action 12: Add ICMP rule to SG2 +* Test action 13: Verify VM2 is able to communicate with VM1 through FIP1 +* **Test assertion 4:** The ping operation is successful +* Test action 14: Delete SG1, SG2, SG3, SG4, NET1, NET2, SUBNET1, SUBNET2, R1, R2, + VM1, VM2, FIP1 and FIP2 + +Pass / fail criteria +'''''''''''''''''''' + +This test evaluates the ability of the security group to filter packets cross tenant. +Specifically, the test verifies that: + +* Without ICMP security group rule, the ICMP packets cannot be received by the server + in another tenant which differs from the source server. + +* With ingress ICMP security group rule enabled only at tenant1, the server in tenant2 + can ping server in tenant1 but not the reverse direction. + +* With ingress ICMP security group rule enabled at tenant2 also, the ping works from both directions. + +In order to pass this test, all test assertions listed in the test execution above need to pass. + +Post conditions +--------------- + +N/A + +--------------------------------------------------- +Test Case 3 - Test Security Group in Tenant Traffic +--------------------------------------------------- + +Test case specification +----------------------- + +tempest.scenario.test_security_groups_basic_ops.TestSecurityGroupsBasicOps.test_in_tenant_traffic + +Test preconditions +------------------ + +* Neutron security-group extension API +* One public network + +Basic test flow execution description and pass/fail criteria +------------------------------------------------------------ + +Test execution +'''''''''''''' + +* Test action 1: Create a neutron network NET1 +* Test action 2: Create a tenant router R1 which routes traffic to public network +* Test action 3: Create a subnet SUBNET1 and add it as router interface +* Test action 4: Create 2 empty security groups SG1 and SG2 +* Test action 5: Add a tcp rule to SG1 +* Test action 6: Create a server VM1 with SG1, SG2 and NET1, and assign a floating ip + FIP1 (via R1) to VM1 +* Test action 7: Create second server VM2 with default security group and NET1 +* Test action 8: Verify VM1 fails to communicate with VM2 through VM2's fixed ip +* **Test assertion 1:** The ping operation is failed +* Test action 9: Add ICMP security group rule to default security group +* Test action 10: Verify VM1 is able to communicate with VM2 through VM2's fixed ip +* **Test assertion 2:** The ping operation is successful +* Test action 11: Delete SG1, SG2, NET1, SUBNET1, R1, VM1, VM2 and FIP1 + +Pass / fail criteria +'''''''''''''''''''' + +This test evaluates the ability of the security group to filter packets in one tenant. +Specifically, the test verifies that: + +* Without ICMP security group rule, the ICMP packets cannot be received by the server + in the same tenant. + +* With ICMP security group rule, the ICMP packets can be received by the server + in the same tenant. + +In order to pass this test, all test assertions listed in the test execution above need to pass. + +Post conditions +--------------- + +N/A + +------------------------------------------- +Test Case 4 - Test Multiple Security Groups +------------------------------------------- + +Test case specification +----------------------- + +tempest.scenario.test_security_groups_basic_ops.TestSecurityGroupsBasicOps.test_multiple_security_groups + +Test preconditions +------------------ + +* Neutron security-group extension API +* One public network + +Basic test flow execution description and pass/fail criteria +------------------------------------------------------------ + +Test execution +'''''''''''''' + +* Test action 1: Create a neutron network NET1 +* Test action 2: Create a tenant router R1 which routes traffic to public network +* Test action 3: Create a subnet SUBNET1 and add it as router interface +* Test action 4: Create 2 empty security groups SG1 and SG2 +* Test action 5: Add a tcp rule to SG1 +* Test action 6: Create a server VM1 with SG1, SG2 and NET1, and assign a floating ip + FIP1 (via R1) to VM1 +* Test action 7: Verify failed to ping FIP1 +* **Test assertion 1:** The ping operation is failed +* Test action 8: Add ICMP security group rule to SG2 +* Test action 9: Verify can ping FIP1 successfully +* **Test assertion 2:** The ping operation is successful +* Test action 10: Verify can SSH to VM1 with FIP1 +* **Test assertion 3:** Can SSH to VM1 successfully +* Test action 11: Delete SG1, SG2, NET1, SUBNET1, R1, VM1 and FIP1 + +Pass / fail criteria +'''''''''''''''''''' + +This test evaluates the ability of multiple security groups to filter packets. +Specifically, the test verifies that: + +* A server with 2 security groups, one with TCP rule and without ICMP rule, + cannot receive the ICMP packets sending from the tempest host machine. + +* A server with 2 security groups, one with TCP rule and the other with ICMP rule, + can receive the ICMP packets sending from the tempest host machine and be connected + via the SSH client. + +In order to pass this test, all test assertions listed in the test execution above need to pass. + +Post conditions +--------------- + +N/A + +------------------------------------------------------- +Test Case 5 - Test Port Security Disable Security Group +------------------------------------------------------- + +Test case specification +----------------------- + +tempest.scenario.test_security_groups_basic_ops.TestSecurityGroupsBasicOps.test_port_security_disable_security_group + +Test preconditions +------------------ + +* Neutron security-group extension API +* Neutron port-security extension API +* One public network + +Basic test flow execution description and pass/fail criteria +------------------------------------------------------------ + +Test execution +'''''''''''''' + +* Test action 1: Create a neutron network NET1 +* Test action 2: Create a tenant router R1 which routes traffic to public network +* Test action 3: Create a subnet SUBNET1 and add it as router interface +* Test action 4: Create 2 empty security groups SG1 and SG2 +* Test action 5: Add a tcp rule to SG1 +* Test action 6: Create a server VM1 with SG1, SG2 and NET1, and assign a floating ip + FIP1 (via R1) to VM1 +* Test action 7: Create second server VM2 with default security group and NET1 +* Test action 8: Update 'security_groups' to be none and 'port_security_enabled' to be + True for VM2's port +* Test action 9: Verify VM1 fails to communicate with VM2 through VM2's fixed ip +* **Test assertion 1:** The ping operation is failed +* Test action 10: Update 'security_groups' to be none and 'port_security_enabled' to be + False for VM2's port +* Test action 11: Verify VM1 is able to communicate with VM2 through VM2's fixed ip +* **Test assertion 2:** The ping operation is successful +* Test action 12: Delete SG1, SG2, NET1, SUBNET1, R1, VM1, VM2 and FIP1 + +Pass / fail criteria +'''''''''''''''''''' + +This test evaluates the ability of port security to disable security group. +Specifically, the test verifies that: + +* The ICMP packets cannot pass the port whose 'port_security_enabled' is True + and security_groups is none. + +* The ICMP packets can pass the port whose 'port_security_enabled' is False + and security_groups is none. + +In order to pass this test, all test assertions listed in the test execution above need to pass. + +Post conditions +--------------- + +N/A + +--------------------------------------------- +Test Case 6 - Test Update Port Security Group +--------------------------------------------- + +Test case specification +----------------------- + +tempest.scenario.test_security_groups_basic_ops.TestSecurityGroupsBasicOps.test_port_update_new_security_group + +Test preconditions +------------------ + +* Neutron security-group extension API +* One public network + +Basic test flow execution description and pass/fail criteria +------------------------------------------------------------ + +Test execution +'''''''''''''' + +* Test action 1: Create a neutron network NET1 +* Test action 2: Create a tenant router R1 which routes traffic to public network +* Test action 3: Create a subnet SUBNET1 and add it as router interface +* Test action 4: Create 2 empty security groups SG1 and SG2 +* Test action 5: Add a tcp rule to SG1 +* Test action 6: Create a server VM1 with SG1, SG2 and NET1, and assign a floating ip + FIP1 (via R1) to VM1 +* Test action 7: Create third empty security group SG3 +* Test action 8: Add ICMP rule to SG3 +* Test action 9: Create second server VM2 with default security group and NET1 +* Test action 10: Verify VM1 fails to communicate with VM2 through VM2's fixed ip +* **Test assertion 1:** The ping operation is failed +* Test action 11: Update 'security_groups' to be SG3 for VM2's port +* Test action 12: Verify VM1 is able to communicate with VM2 through VM2's fixed ip +* **Test assertion 2:** The ping operation is successful +* Test action 13: Delete SG1, SG2, SG3, NET1, SUBNET1, R1, VM1, VM2 and FIP1 + +Pass / fail criteria +'''''''''''''''''''' + +This test evaluates the ability to update port with a new security group. +Specifically, the test verifies that: + +* Without ICMP security group rule, the VM cannot receive ICMP packets. + +* Update the port's security group which has ICMP rule, the VM can receive ICMP packets. + +In order to pass this test, all test assertions listed in the test execution above need to pass. + +Post conditions +--------------- + +N/A diff --git a/docs/testing/user/testspecification/vimoperationscompute/index.rst b/docs/testing/user/testspecification/vimoperationscompute/index.rst index 4ed37809..42a8e70e 100644 --- a/docs/testing/user/testspecification/vimoperationscompute/index.rst +++ b/docs/testing/user/testspecification/vimoperationscompute/index.rst @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ .. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. .. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 -.. (c) Ericsson AB +.. (c) Ericsson AB, Huawei Technologies Co.,Ltd ========================================= VIM compute operations test specification @@ -12,47 +12,375 @@ VIM compute operations test specification Scope ===== +The VIM compute operations test area evaluates the ability of the system under +test to support VIM compute operations. The test cases documented here are the +compute API test cases in the OpenStack Interop guideline 2016.8 as implemented +by the RefStack client. These test cases will evaluate basic OpenStack (as a VIM) +compute operations, including: + +- Image management operations +- Basic support operations +- API version support operations +- Quotas management operations +- Basic server operations +- Volume management operations + References ================ +- OpenStack Governance/Interop + + - https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Governance/InteropWG + +- Defcore test cases + + - https://github.com/openstack/interop/blob/master/2016.08.json + +- Refstack client + + - https://github.com/openstack/refstack-client Definitions and abbreviations ============================= +The following terms and abbreviations are used in conjunction with this test area -Use case description -==================== - +- API - Application Programming Interface +- NFVi - Network Functions Virtualization infrastructure +- SUT - System Under Test +- UUID - Universally Unique Identifier +- VIM - Virtual Infrastructure Manager +- VM - Virtual Machine System Under Test (SUT) ======================= +The system under test is assumed to be the NFVi and VIM deployed with a Pharos compliant infrastructure. -Test Suite Structure +Test Area Structure ==================== +The test area is structured based on VIM compute API operations. Each test case is +able to run independently, i.e. irrelevant of the state created by a previous test. +Specifically, every test performs clean-up operations which return the system to +the same state as before the test. + +For brevity, the test cases in this test area are summarized together based on +the operations they are testing. Test Descriptions ================= +API Used and Reference +---------------------- + +Servers: https://developer.openstack.org/api-ref/compute/ + +- create server +- delete server +- list servers +- start server +- stop server +- update server +- get server action +- set server metadata +- update server metadata +- rebuild server + +- create image +- delete image + +- create keypair +- delete keypair + +Block storage: https://developer.openstack.org/api-ref/block-storage + +- create volume +- delete volume +- attach volume to server +- detach volume from server + +----------------------------------------------------- +Test Case 1 - Image operations within the Compute API +----------------------------------------------------- + +Test case specification +----------------------- + +tempest.api.compute.images.test_images_oneserver.ImagesOneServerTestJSON.test_create_delete_image +tempest.api.compute.images.test_images_oneserver.ImagesOneServerTestJSON.test_create_image_specify_multibyte_character_image_name + +Test preconditions +------------------ + +* Compute server extension API + +Basic test flow execution description and pass/fail criteria +------------------------------------------------------------ + +Test execution +'''''''''''''' + +* Test action 1: Create a server VM1 with an image IMG1 and wait for VM1 to reach 'ACTIVE' status +* Test action 2: Create a new server image IMG2 from VM1, specifying image name + and image metadata. Wait for IMG2 to reach 'ACTIVE' status, and then delete IMG2 +* **Test assertion 1:** Verify IMG2 is created with correct image name and image + metadata; verify IMG1's 'minRam' equals to IMG2's 'minRam' and IMG2's 'minDisk' equals + to IMG1's 'minDisk' or VM1's flavor disk size +* **Test assertion 2:** Verify IMG2 is deleted correctly +* Test action 3: Create another server IMG3 from VM1, specifying image name + with a 3 byte utf-8 character +* **Test assertion 3:** Verify IMG3 is created correctly +* Test action 4: Delete VM1, IMG1 and IMG3 + +Pass / fail criteria +'''''''''''''''''''' + +This test evaluates the Compute API ability of creating image from server, +deleting image, creating server image with multi-byte character name. +Specifically, the test verifies that: + +* Compute server create image and delete image APIs work correctly. +* Compute server image can be created with multi-byte character name. + +In order to pass this test, all test assertions listed in the test execution above need to pass. + +Post conditions +--------------- + +N/A + +----------------------------------------------------- +Test Case 2 - Action operation within the Compute API +----------------------------------------------------- + +Test case specification +----------------------- + +tempest.api.compute.servers.test_instance_actions.InstanceActionsTestJSON.test_get_instance_action +tempest.api.compute.servers.test_instance_actions.InstanceActionsTestJSON.test_list_instance_actions + +Test preconditions +------------------ + +* Compute server extension API + +Basic test flow execution description and pass/fail criteria +------------------------------------------------------------ + +Test execution +'''''''''''''' + +* Test action 1: Create a server VM1 and wait for VM1 to reach 'ACTIVE' status +* Test action 2: Get the action details ACT_DTL of VM1 +* **Test assertion 1:** Verify ACT_DTL's 'instance_uuid' matches VM1's ID and + ACT_DTL's 'action' matched 'create' +* Test action 3: Create a server VM2 and wait for VM2 to reach 'ACTIVE' status +* Test action 4: Delete server VM2 and wait for VM2 to reach termination +* Test action 5: Get the action list ACT_LST of VM2 +* **Test assertion 2:** Verify ACT_LST's length is 2 and two actions are 'create' and 'delete' +* Test action 6: Delete VM1 + +Pass / fail criteria +'''''''''''''''''''' + +This test evaluates the Compute API ability of getting the action details +of a provided server and getting the action list of a deleted server. +Specifically, the test verifies that: + +* Get the details of the action in a specified server. +* List the actions that were performed on the specified server. + +In order to pass this test, all test assertions listed in the test execution above need to pass. + +Post conditions +--------------- + +N/A + +-------------------------------------------------------------------------- +Test Case 3 - Generate, import and delete SSH keys within Compute services +-------------------------------------------------------------------------- + +Test case specification +----------------------- + +tempest.api.compute.servers.test_servers.ServersTestJSON.test_create_specify_keypair + +Test preconditions +------------------ + +* Compute server extension API + +Basic test flow execution description and pass/fail criteria +------------------------------------------------------------ + +Test execution +'''''''''''''' + +* Test action 1: Create a keypair KEYP1 and list all existing keypairs +* Test action 2: Create a server VM1 with KEYP1 and wait for VM1 to reach 'ACTIVE' status +* Test action 3: Show details of VM1 +* **Test assertion 1:** Verify value of 'key_name' in the details equals to the name of KEYP1 +* Test action 4: Delete KEYP1 and VM1 + +Pass / fail criteria +'''''''''''''''''''' + +This test evaluates the Compute API ability of creating a keypair, listing +keypairs and creating a server with a provided keypair. +Specifically, the test verifies that: + +* Compute create keypair and list keypair APIs work correctly. +* While creating a server, keypair can be specified. + +In order to pass this test, all test assertions listed in the test execution above need to pass. + +Post conditions +--------------- + +N/A + +-------------------------------------------------------- +Test Case 4 - List supported versions of the Compute API +-------------------------------------------------------- + +Test case specification +----------------------- + +tempest.api.compute.test_versions.TestVersions.test_list_api_versions + +Test preconditions +------------------ + +* Compute versions extension API + +Basic test flow execution description and pass/fail criteria +------------------------------------------------------------ + +Test execution +'''''''''''''' + +* Test action 1: Get a List of versioned endpoints in the SUT +* **Test assertion 1:** Verify endpoints versions start at 'v2.0' + +Pass / fail criteria +'''''''''''''''''''' + +This test evaluates the functionality of listing all available APIs to API consumers. +Specifically, the test verifies that: + +* Compute list API versions API works correctly. + +In order to pass this test, all test assertions listed in the test execution above need to pass. + +Post conditions +--------------- + +N/A + +---------------------------------------------- +Test Case 5 - Quotas management in Compute API +---------------------------------------------- + +Test case specification +----------------------- + +tempest.api.compute.test_quotas.QuotasTestJSON.test_get_default_quotas +tempest.api.compute.test_quotas.QuotasTestJSON.test_get_quotas + +Test preconditions +------------------ + +* Compute quotas extension API + +Basic test flow execution description and pass/fail criteria +------------------------------------------------------------ + +Test execution +'''''''''''''' +* Test action 1: Get the default quota set using the tenant ID +* **Test assertion 1:** Verify the default quota set ID matches tenant ID and + the default quota set is complete +* Test action 2: Get the quota set using the tenant ID +* **Test assertion 2:** Verify the quota set ID matches tenant ID and the quota + set is complete +* Test action 3: Get the quota set using the user ID +* **Test assertion 3:** Verify the quota set ID matches tenant ID and the quota + set is complete + +Pass / fail criteria +'''''''''''''''''''' + +This test evaluates the functionality of getting quota set. +Specifically, the test verifies that: + +* User can get the default quota set for its tenant. +* User can get the quota set for its tenant. +* User can get the quota set using user ID. + +In order to pass this test, all test assertions listed in the test execution above need to pass. + +Post conditions +--------------- + +N/A + +-------------------------------------------------------- +Test Case 6 - Basic server operations in the Compute API +-------------------------------------------------------- + +Test case specification +----------------------- + +This test case evaluates the Compute API ability of basic server operations, including: + +- Create a server with admin password +- Create a server with a name that already exists +- Create a server with a numeric name +- Create a server with a really long metadata +- Create a server with a name whose length exceeding 255 characters +- Create a server with an unknown flavor +- Create a server with an unknown image ID +- Create a server with an invalid network UUID +- Delete a server using a server ID that exceeds length limit +- Delete a server using a negative server ID +- Get a nonexistent server details +- Verify the instance host name is the same as the server name +- Create a server with an invalid access IPv6 address +- List all existent servers +- Filter the (detailed) list of servers by flavor, image, server name, server status or limit +- Lock a server and try server stop, unlock and retry +- Get and delete metadata from a server +- List and set metadata for a server +- Reboot, rebuild, stop and start a server +- Update a server's access addresses and server name + +The reference is, + +tempest.api.compute.servers.test_servers.ServersTestJSON.test_create_server_with_admin_password +tempest.api.compute.servers.test_servers.ServersTestJSON.test_create_with_existing_server_name +tempest.api.compute.servers.test_servers_negative.ServersNegativeTestJSON.test_create_numeric_server_name +tempest.api.compute.servers.test_servers_negative.ServersNegativeTestJSON.test_create_server_metadata_exceeds_length_limit +tempest.api.compute.servers.test_servers_negative.ServersNegativeTestJSON.test_create_server_name_length_exceeds_256 +tempest.api.compute.servers.test_servers_negative.ServersNegativeTestJSON.test_create_with_invalid_flavor +tempest.api.compute.servers.test_servers_negative.ServersNegativeTestJSON.test_create_with_invalid_image +tempest.api.compute.servers.test_servers_negative.ServersNegativeTestJSON.test_create_with_invalid_network_uuid +tempest.api.compute.servers.test_servers_negative.ServersNegativeTestJSON.test_delete_server_pass_id_exceeding_length_limit +tempest.api.compute.servers.test_servers_negative.ServersNegativeTestJSON.test_delete_server_pass_negative_id +tempest.api.compute.servers.test_servers_negative.ServersNegativeTestJSON.test_get_non_existent_server tempest.api.compute.servers.test_create_server.ServersTestJSON.test_host_name_is_same_as_server_name +tempest.api.compute.servers.test_create_server.ServersTestManualDisk.test_host_name_is_same_as_server_name +tempest.api.compute.servers.test_servers_negative.ServersNegativeTestJSON.test_invalid_ip_v6_address tempest.api.compute.servers.test_create_server.ServersTestJSON.test_list_servers tempest.api.compute.servers.test_create_server.ServersTestJSON.test_list_servers_with_detail -tempest.api.compute.servers.test_create_server.ServersTestJSON.test_verify_created_server_vcpus -tempest.api.compute.servers.test_create_server.ServersTestJSON.test_verify_server_details -tempest.api.compute.servers.test_create_server.ServersTestManualDisk.test_host_name_is_same_as_server_name tempest.api.compute.servers.test_create_server.ServersTestManualDisk.test_list_servers tempest.api.compute.servers.test_create_server.ServersTestManualDisk.test_list_servers_with_detail -tempest.api.compute.servers.test_create_server.ServersTestManualDisk.test_verify_created_server_vcpus -tempest.api.compute.servers.test_create_server.ServersTestManualDisk.test_verify_server_details -tempest.api.compute.servers.test_instance_actions.InstanceActionsTestJSON.test_get_instance_action -tempest.api.compute.servers.test_instance_actions.InstanceActionsTestJSON.test_list_instance_actions tempest.api.compute.servers.test_list_server_filters.ListServerFiltersTestJSON.test_list_servers_detailed_filter_by_flavor tempest.api.compute.servers.test_list_server_filters.ListServerFiltersTestJSON.test_list_servers_detailed_filter_by_image tempest.api.compute.servers.test_list_server_filters.ListServerFiltersTestJSON.test_list_servers_detailed_filter_by_server_name tempest.api.compute.servers.test_list_server_filters.ListServerFiltersTestJSON.test_list_servers_detailed_filter_by_server_status tempest.api.compute.servers.test_list_server_filters.ListServerFiltersTestJSON.test_list_servers_detailed_limit_results -tempest.api.compute.servers.test_list_server_filters.ListServerFiltersTestJSON.test_list_servers_filter_by_active_status tempest.api.compute.servers.test_list_server_filters.ListServerFiltersTestJSON.test_list_servers_filter_by_flavor tempest.api.compute.servers.test_list_server_filters.ListServerFiltersTestJSON.test_list_servers_filter_by_image tempest.api.compute.servers.test_list_server_filters.ListServerFiltersTestJSON.test_list_servers_filter_by_limit @@ -72,41 +400,302 @@ tempest.api.compute.servers.test_list_servers_negative.ListServersNegativeTestJS tempest.api.compute.servers.test_list_servers_negative.ListServersNegativeTestJSON.test_list_servers_status_non_existing tempest.api.compute.servers.test_list_servers_negative.ListServersNegativeTestJSON.test_list_servers_with_a_deleted_server tempest.api.compute.servers.test_server_actions.ServerActionsTestJSON.test_lock_unlock_server -tempest.api.compute.servers.test_server_actions.ServerActionsTestJSON.test_reboot_server_hard -tempest.api.compute.servers.test_server_actions.ServerActionsTestJSON.test_rebuild_server -tempest.api.compute.servers.test_server_actions.ServerActionsTestJSON.test_stop_start_server tempest.api.compute.servers.test_server_metadata.ServerMetadataTestJSON.test_delete_server_metadata_item tempest.api.compute.servers.test_server_metadata.ServerMetadataTestJSON.test_get_server_metadata_item tempest.api.compute.servers.test_server_metadata.ServerMetadataTestJSON.test_list_server_metadata tempest.api.compute.servers.test_server_metadata.ServerMetadataTestJSON.test_set_server_metadata tempest.api.compute.servers.test_server_metadata.ServerMetadataTestJSON.test_set_server_metadata_item tempest.api.compute.servers.test_server_metadata.ServerMetadataTestJSON.test_update_server_metadata -tempest.api.compute.servers.test_servers.ServersTestJSON.test_create_server_with_admin_password -tempest.api.compute.servers.test_servers.ServersTestJSON.test_create_specify_keypair -tempest.api.compute.servers.test_servers.ServersTestJSON.test_create_with_existing_server_name -tempest.api.compute.servers.test_servers.ServersTestJSON.test_update_access_server_address -tempest.api.compute.servers.test_servers.ServersTestJSON.test_update_server_name -tempest.api.compute.servers.test_servers_negative.ServersNegativeTestJSON.test_create_numeric_server_name -tempest.api.compute.servers.test_servers_negative.ServersNegativeTestJSON.test_create_server_metadata_exceeds_length_limit -tempest.api.compute.servers.test_servers_negative.ServersNegativeTestJSON.test_create_server_name_length_exceeds_256 -tempest.api.compute.servers.test_servers_negative.ServersNegativeTestJSON.test_create_with_invalid_flavor -tempest.api.compute.servers.test_servers_negative.ServersNegativeTestJSON.test_create_with_invalid_image -tempest.api.compute.servers.test_servers_negative.ServersNegativeTestJSON.test_create_with_invalid_network_uuid -tempest.api.compute.servers.test_servers_negative.ServersNegativeTestJSON.test_delete_server_pass_id_exceeding_length_limit -tempest.api.compute.servers.test_servers_negative.ServersNegativeTestJSON.test_delete_server_pass_negative_id -tempest.api.compute.servers.test_servers_negative.ServersNegativeTestJSON.test_get_non_existent_server -tempest.api.compute.servers.test_servers_negative.ServersNegativeTestJSON.test_invalid_ip_v6_address +tempest.api.compute.servers.test_servers_negative.ServersNegativeTestJSON.test_server_name_blank +tempest.api.compute.servers.test_server_actions.ServerActionsTestJSON.test_reboot_server_hard tempest.api.compute.servers.test_servers_negative.ServersNegativeTestJSON.test_reboot_non_existent_server +tempest.api.compute.servers.test_server_actions.ServerActionsTestJSON.test_rebuild_server tempest.api.compute.servers.test_servers_negative.ServersNegativeTestJSON.test_rebuild_deleted_server tempest.api.compute.servers.test_servers_negative.ServersNegativeTestJSON.test_rebuild_non_existent_server -tempest.api.compute.servers.test_servers_negative.ServersNegativeTestJSON.test_rebuild_reboot_deleted_server -tempest.api.compute.servers.test_servers_negative.ServersNegativeTestJSON.test_server_name_blank +tempest.api.compute.servers.test_server_actions.ServerActionsTestJSON.test_stop_start_server tempest.api.compute.servers.test_servers_negative.ServersNegativeTestJSON.test_stop_non_existent_server +tempest.api.compute.servers.test_servers.ServersTestJSON.test_update_access_server_address +tempest.api.compute.servers.test_servers.ServersTestJSON.test_update_server_name tempest.api.compute.servers.test_servers_negative.ServersNegativeTestJSON.test_update_name_of_non_existent_server tempest.api.compute.servers.test_servers_negative.ServersNegativeTestJSON.test_update_server_name_length_exceeds_256 tempest.api.compute.servers.test_servers_negative.ServersNegativeTestJSON.test_update_server_set_empty_name -tempest.api.compute.test_quotas.QuotasTestJSON.test_get_default_quotas -tempest.api.compute.test_quotas.QuotasTestJSON.test_get_quotas -tempest.api.compute.test_versions.TestVersions.test_list_api_versions +tempest.api.compute.servers.test_create_server.ServersTestJSON.test_verify_created_server_vcpus +tempest.api.compute.servers.test_create_server.ServersTestJSON.test_verify_server_details +tempest.api.compute.servers.test_create_server.ServersTestManualDisk.test_verify_created_server_vcpus +tempest.api.compute.servers.test_create_server.ServersTestManualDisk.test_verify_server_details + +tempest.api.compute.servers.test_list_server_filters.ListServerFiltersTestJSON.test_list_servers_filter_by_active_status +tempest.api.compute.servers.test_servers_negative.ServersNegativeTestJSON.test_rebuild_reboot_deleted_server + +Note: the last 2 test cases are the alias of another 2 test cases respectively, which are + +tempest.api.compute.servers.test_list_server_filters.ListServerFiltersTestJSON.test_list_servers_filter_by_server_status +tempest.api.compute.servers.test_servers_negative.ServersNegativeTestJSON.test_rebuild_deleted_server + +Alias should always be included so that the test run will be tempest version agnostic, +which can be used to test different version of OpenStack. + +Test preconditions +------------------ + +* Compute quotas extension API + +Basic test flow execution description and pass/fail criteria +------------------------------------------------------------ + +Test execution +'''''''''''''' + +* Test action 1: Create a server VM1 with a admin password 'testpassword' +* **Test assertion 1:** Verify the password returned in the response equals to 'testpassword' +* Test action 2: Generate a VM name VM_NAME +* Test action 3: Create 2 servers VM2 and VM3 both with name VM_NAME +* **Test assertion 2:** Verify VM2's ID is not equal to VM3's ID, and VM2's name equal to VM3's name +* Test action 4: Create a server VM4 with a numeric name '12345' +* **Test assertion 3:** Verify creating VM4 failed +* Test action 5: Create a server VM5 with a long metadata '{'a': 'b' * 260}' +* **Test assertion 4:** Verify creating VM5 failed +* Test action 6: Create a server VM6 with name length exceeding 255 characters +* **Test assertion 5:** Verify creating VM6 failed +* Test action 7: Create a server VM7 with an unknown flavor '-1' +* **Test assertion 6:** Verify creating VM7 failed +* Test action 8: Create a server VM8 with an unknown image ID '-1' +* **Test assertion 7:** Verify creating VM8 failed +* Test action 9: Create a server VM9 with an invalid network UUID 'a-b-c-d-e-f-g-h-i-j' +* **Test assertion 8:** Verify creating VM9 failed +* Test action 10: Delete a server using a server ID that exceeds system's max integer limit +* **Test assertion 9:** Verify deleting server failed +* Test action 11: Delete a server using a server ID '-1' +* **Test assertion 10:** Verify deleting server failed +* Test action 12: Get a nonexistent server by using a random generated server ID +* **Test assertion 11:** Verify get server failed +* Test action 13: SSH into a provided server and get server's hostname +* **Test assertion 12:** Verify server's host name is the same as the server name +* Test action 14: SSH into a provided server and get server's hostname (manual disk configuration) +* **Test assertion 13:** Verify server's host name is the same as the server name (manual disk configuration) +* Test action 15: Create a server with an invalid access IPv6 address +* **Test assertion 14:** Verify creating server failed, a bad request error is returned in response +* Test action 16: List all existent servers +* **Test assertion 15:** Verify a provided server is in the server list +* Test action 17: List all existent servers in detail +* **Test assertion 16:** Verify a provided server is in the detailed server list +* Test action 18: List all existent servers (manual disk configuration) +* **Test assertion 17:** Verify a provided server is in the server list (manual disk configuration) +* Test action 19: List all existent servers in detail (manual disk configuration) +* **Test assertion 18:** Verify a provided server is in the detailed server list (manual disk configuration) +* Test action 20: List all existent servers in detail and filter the server list by flavor +* **Test assertion 19:** Verify the filtered server list is correct +* Test action 21: List all existent servers in detail and filter the server list by image +* **Test assertion 20:** Verify the filtered server list is correct +* Test action 22: List all existent servers in detail and filter the server list by server name +* **Test assertion 21:** Verify the filtered server list is correct +* Test action 23: List all existent servers in detail and filter the server list by server status +* **Test assertion 22:** Verify the filtered server list is correct +* Test action 24: List all existent servers in detail and filter the server list by display limit '1' +* **Test assertion 23:** Verify the length of filtered server list is 1 +* Test action 25: List all existent servers and filter the server list by flavor +* **Test assertion 24:** Verify the filtered server list is correct +* Test action 26: List all existent servers and filter the server list by image +* **Test assertion 25:** Verify the filtered server list is correct +* Test action 27: List all existent servers and filter the server list by display limit '1' +* **Test assertion 26:** Verify the length of filtered server list is 1 +* Test action 28: List all existent servers and filter the server list by server name +* **Test assertion 27:** Verify the filtered server list is correct +* Test action 29: List all existent servers and filter the server list by server status +* **Test assertion 28:** Verify the filtered server list is correct +* Test action 30: List all existent servers and filter the server list by server name wildcard +* **Test assertion 29:** Verify the filtered server list is correct +* Test action 31: List all existent servers and filter the server list by part of server name +* **Test assertion 30:** Verify the filtered server list is correct +* Test action 32: List all existent servers and filter the server list by a future change-since date +* **Test assertion 31:** Verify the filtered server list is empty +* Test action 33: List all existent servers and filter the server list by a invalid change-since date format +* **Test assertion 32:** Verify a bad request error is returned in the response +* Test action 34: List all existent servers and filter the server list by display limit '1' +* **Test assertion 33:** Verify the length of filtered server list is 1 +* Test action 35: List all existent servers and filter the server list by a + display limit value greater than the length of the server list +* **Test assertion 34:** Verify the length of filtered server list equals to the length of server list +* Test action 36: List all existent servers and filter the server list by display limit '-1' +* **Test assertion 35:** Verify a bad request error is returned in the response +* Test action 37: List all existent servers and filter the server list by a string type limit value 'testing' +* **Test assertion 36:** Verify a bad request error is returned in the response +* Test action 38: List all existent servers and filter the server list by a nonexistent flavor +* **Test assertion 37:** Verify the filtered server list is empty +* Test action 39: List all existent servers and filter the server list by a nonexistent image +* **Test assertion 38:** Verify the filtered server list is empty +* Test action 40: List all existent servers and filter the server list by a nonexistent server name +* **Test assertion 39:** Verify the filtered server list is empty +* Test action 41: List all existent servers in detail and search the server list for a deleted server +* **Test assertion 40:** Verify the deleted server is not in the server list +* Test action 42: List all existent servers and filter the server list by a nonexistent server status +* **Test assertion 41:** Verify the filtered server list is empty +* Test action 43: List all existent servers in detail +* **Test assertion 42:** Verify a provided deleted server's id is not in the server list +* Test action 44: Lock a provided server VM10 and retrieve the server's status +* **Test assertion 43:** Verify VM10 is in 'ACTIVE' status +* Test action 45: Stop VM10 +* **Test assertion 44:** Verify stop VM10 failed +* Test action 46: Unlock VM10 and stop VM10 again +* **Test assertion 45:** Verify VM10 is stopped and in 'SHUTOFF' status +* Test action 47: Start VM10 +* **Test assertion 46:** Verify VM10 is in 'ACTIVE' status +* Test action 48: Delete metadata item 'key1' from a provided server +* **Test assertion 47:** Verify the metadata item is removed +* Test action 49: Get metadata item 'key2' from a provided server +* **Test assertion 48:** Verify the metadata item is correct +* Test action 50: List all metadata key/value pair for a provided server +* **Test assertion 49:** Verify all metadata are retrieved correctly +* Test action 51: Set metadata {'meta2': 'data2', 'meta3': 'data3'} for a provided server +* **Test assertion 50:** Verify server's metadata are replaced correctly +* Test action 52: Set metadata item nova's value to 'alt' for a provided server +* **Test assertion 51:** Verify server's metadata are set correctly +* Test action 53: Update metadata {'key1': 'alt1', 'key3': 'value3'} for a provided server +* **Test assertion 52:** Verify server's metadata are updated correctly +* Test action 54: Create a server with empty name parameter +* **Test assertion 53:** Verify create server failed +* Test action 55: Hard reboot a provided server +* **Test assertion 54:** Verify server is rebooted successfully +* Test action 56: Soft reboot a nonexistent server +* **Test assertion 55:** Verify reboot failed, an error is returned in the response +* Test action 57: Rebuild a provided server with new image, new server name and metadata +* **Test assertion 56:** Verify server is rebuilt successfully, server image, name and metadata are correct +* Test action 58: Create a server VM11 +* Test action 59: Delete VM11 and wait for VM11 to reach termination +* Test action 60: Rebuild VM11 with another image +* **Test assertion 57:** Verify rebuild server failed, an error is returned in the response +* Test action 61: Rebuild a nonexistent server +* **Test assertion 58:** Verify rebuild server failed, an error is returned in the response +* Test action 62: Stop a provided server +* **Test assertion 59:** Verify server reaches 'SHUTOFF' status +* Test action 63: Start the stopped server +* **Test assertion 60:** Verify server reaches 'ACTIVE' status +* Test action 64: Stop a provided server +* **Test assertion 61:** Verify stop server failed, an error is returned in the response +* Test action 65: Create a server VM12 and wait it to reach 'ACTIVE' status +* Test action 66: Update VM12's IPv4 and IPv6 access addresses +* **Test assertion 62:** Verify VM12's access addresses have been updated correctly +* Test action 67: Create a server VM13 and wait it to reach 'ACTIVE' status +* Test action 68: Update VM13's server name with non-ASCII characters '\u00CD\u00F1st\u00E1\u00F1c\u00E9' +* **Test assertion 63:** Verify VM13's server name has been updated correctly +* Test action 69: Update the server name of a nonexistent server +* **Test assertion 64:** Verify update server name failed, an 'object not found' error is returned in the response +* Test action 70: Update a provided server's name with a 256-character long name +* **Test assertion 65:** Verify update server name failed, a bad request is returned in the response +* Test action 71: Update a provided server's server name with an empty string +* **Test assertion 66:** Verify update server name failed, a bad request error is returned in the response +* Test action 72: Get the number of vcpus of a provided server +* Test action 73: Get the number of vcpus stated by the server's flavor +* **Test assertion 67:** Verify that the number of vcpus reported by the server + matches the amount stated by the server's flavor +* Test action 74: Create a server VM14 +* **Test assertion 68:** Verify VM14's server attributes are set correctly +* Test action 75: Get the number of vcpus of a provided server (manual disk configuration) +* Test action 76: Get the number of vcpus stated by the server's flavor (manual disk configuration) +* **Test assertion 69:** Verify that the number of vcpus reported by the server + matches the amount stated by the server's flavor (manual disk configuration) +* Test action 77: Create a server VM15 (manual disk configuration) +* **Test assertion 70:** Verify VM15's server attributes are set correctly (manual disk configuration) +* Test action 78: Delete all VMs created + +Pass / fail criteria +'''''''''''''''''''' + +This test evaluates the functionality of basic server operations. +Specifically, the test verifies that: + +* If an admin password is provided on server creation, the server's root password should be set to that password +* Create a server with a name that already exists is allowed +* Create a server with a numeric name or a name that exceeds the length limit is not allowed +* Create a server with a metadata that exceeds the length limit is not allowed +* Create a server with an invalid flavor, an invalid image or an invalid network UUID is not allowed +* Delete a server with a server ID that exceeds the length limit or a nonexistent server ID is not allowed +* A provided server's host name is the same as the server name +* Create a server with an invalid IPv6 access address is not allowed +* A created server is in the (detailed) list of servers +* Filter the (detailed) list of servers by flavor, image, server name, server status, + and display limit, respectively. +* Filter the list of servers by a future date +* Filter the list of servers by an invalid date format, a negative display limit or a string type + display limit value is not allowed +* Filter the list of servers by a nonexistent flavor, image, server name or server status is not allowed +* Deleted servers are not in the list of servers +* Deleted servers do not show by default in list of servers +* Locked server is not allowed to be stopped by non-admin user +* Can get and delete metadata from servers +* Can list, set and update server metadata +* Create a server with name parameter empty is not allowed +* Hard reboot a server and the server should be power cycled +* Reboot, rebuild and stop a nonexistent server is not allowed +* Rebuild a server using the provided image and metadata +* Stop and restart a server +* A server's name and access addresses can be updated +* Update the name of a nonexistent server is not allowed +* Update name of a server to a name that exceeds the name length limit is not allowed +* Update name of a server to an empty string is not allowed +* The number of vcpus reported by the server matches the amount stated by the server's flavor +* The specified server attributes are set correctly + +In order to pass this test, all test assertions listed in the test execution above need to pass. + +Post conditions +--------------- + +N/A + +----------------------------------------------------------------- +Test Case 7 - Retrieve volume information through the Compute API +----------------------------------------------------------------- + +Test case specification +----------------------- + +This test case evaluates the Compute API ability of attaching volume to a +specific server and retrieve volume information, the reference is, + tempest.api.compute.volumes.test_attach_volume.AttachVolumeTestJSON.test_attach_detach_volume tempest.api.compute.volumes.test_attach_volume.AttachVolumeTestJSON.test_list_get_volume_attachments + +Test preconditions +------------------ + +* Compute volume extension API + +Basic test flow execution description and pass/fail criteria +------------------------------------------------------------ + +Test execution +'''''''''''''' + +* Test action 1: Create a server VM1 and a volume VOL1 +* Test action 2: Attach VOL1 to VM1 +* **Test assertion 1:** Stop VM1 successfully and wait VM1 to reach 'SHUTOFF' status +* **Test assertion 2:** Start VM1 successfully and wait VM1 to reach 'ACTIVE' status +* **Test assertion 3:** SSH into VM1 and verify VOL1 is in VM1's root disk devices +* Test action 3: Detach VOL1 from VM1 +* **Test assertion 4:** Stop VM1 successfully and wait VM1 to reach 'SHUTOFF' status +* **Test assertion 5:** Start VM1 successfully and wait VM1 to reach 'ACTIVE' status +* **Test assertion 6:** SSH into VM1 and verify VOL1 is not in VM1's root disk devices +* Test action 4: Create a server VM2 and a volume VOL2 +* Test action 5: Attach VOL2 to VM2 +* Test action 6: List VM2's volume attachments +* **Test assertion 7:** Verify the length of the list is 1 and VOL2 attachment is in the list +* Test action 7: Retrieve VM2's volume information +* **Test assertion 8:** Verify volume information is correct +* Test action 8: Delete VM1, VM2, VOL1 and VOL2 + +Pass / fail criteria +'''''''''''''''''''' + +This test evaluates the functionality of retrieving volume information. +Specifically, the test verifies that: + +* Stop and start a server with an attached volume work correctly. +* Retrieve a server's volume information correctly. + +In order to pass this test, all test assertions listed in the test execution above need to pass. + +Post conditions +--------------- + +N/A diff --git a/docs/testing/user/testspecification/vimoperationsimage/index.rst b/docs/testing/user/testspecification/vimoperationsimage/index.rst index 932c7382..8e5f08ce 100644 --- a/docs/testing/user/testspecification/vimoperationsimage/index.rst +++ b/docs/testing/user/testspecification/vimoperationsimage/index.rst @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ .. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. .. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 -.. (c) Ericsson AB +.. (c) Ericsson AB, Huawei Technologies Co.,Ltd ======================================= VIM image operations test specification @@ -9,17 +9,191 @@ VIM image operations test specification .. toctree:: :maxdepth: 2 -Each test case requires documentation according to: -* Use case specification -* Test preconditions -* Basic test flow execution descriptor -* Post conditions and pass fail criteria +Scope +===== + +The VIM image test area evaluates the ability of the system under test to support +VIM image operations. The test cases documented here are the Image API test cases +in the Openstack Interop guideline 2016.8 as implemented by the Refstack client. +These test cases will evaluate basic Openstack (as a VIM) image operations including +image creation, image list, image update and image deletion capabilities using Glance v2 API. + +References +========== + +- Defcore test cases + + - https://github.com/openstack/interop/blob/master/2016.08.json + +- Refstack client + + - https://github.com/openstack/refstack-client + +Definitions and abbreviations +============================= + +The following terms and abbreviations are used in conjunction with this test area + +- API - Application Programming Interface +- CRUD - Create, Read, Update, and Delete +- NFVi - Network Functions Virtualization infrastructure +- VIM - Virtual Infrastructure Manager + +System Under Test (SUT) +======================= + +The system under test is assumed to be the NFVi and VIM in operation on a +Pharos compliant infrastructure. + +Test Area Structure +==================== + +The test area is structured based on VIM image operations. Each test case is able +to run independently, i.e. irrelevant of the state created by a previous test. + +For brevity, the test cases in this test area are summarized together based on +the operations they are testing. + +Test Descriptions +================= + +API Used and Reference +---------------------- + +Images: https://developer.openstack.org/api-ref/image/v2/ + +- create image +- delete image +- show image details +- show images +- show image schema +- show images schema +- upload binary image data +- add image tag +- delete image tag + +--------------------------------------- +Image get tests using the Glance v2 API +--------------------------------------- + +Test case specification +----------------------- -tempest.api.image.v2.test_images.BasicOperationsImagesTest.test_delete_image -tempest.api.image.v2.test_images.BasicOperationsImagesTest.test_update_image tempest.api.image.v2.test_images.ListImagesTest.test_get_image_schema tempest.api.image.v2.test_images.ListImagesTest.test_get_images_schema +tempest.api.image.v2.test_images_negative.ImagesNegativeTest.test_get_delete_deleted_image +tempest.api.image.v2.test_images_negative.ImagesNegativeTest.test_get_image_null_id +tempest.api.image.v2.test_images_negative.ImagesNegativeTest.test_get_non_existent_image + +tempest.api.image.v2.test_images.ListUserImagesTest.test_get_image_schema +tempest.api.image.v2.test_images.ListUserImagesTest.test_get_images_schema + +Note: the latter two test cases are the alias of the former first two, respectively. +Alias should always be included so that the test run will be tempest version agnostic, +which can be used to test different version of Openstack. + +Test preconditions +------------------ + +Glance is available. + +Basic test flow execution description and pass/fail criteria +------------------------------------------------------------ + +Test execution +'''''''''''''' + +* Test action 1: Create 6 images and store their ids in a created images list. +* Test action 2: Use image v2 API to show image schema and check the body of the response. +* **Test assertion 1:** In the body of the response, the value of the key 'name' is 'image'. +* Test action 3: Use image v2 API to show images schema and check the body of the response. +* **Test assertion 2:** In the body of the response, the value of the key 'name' is 'images'. +* Test action 4: Create an image with name 'test', container_formats 'bare' and + disk_formats 'raw'. Delete this image with its id and then try to show it with + its id. Delete this deleted image again with its id and check the API's response code. +* **Test assertion 3:** The operations of showing and deleting a deleted image with its id + both get 404 response code. +* Test action 5: Use a null image id to show a image and check the API's response code. +* **Test assertion 4:** The API's response code is 404. +* Test action 6: Generate a random uuid and use it as the image id to show the image. +* **Test assertion 5:** The API's response code is 404. +* Test action 7: Delete the 6 images with the stored ids. Show all images and check + whether the 6 images' ids are not in the show list. +* **Test assertion 6:** The 6 images' ids are not found in the show list. + +Pass / fail criteria +'''''''''''''''''''' + +The first two test cases evaluate the ability to use Glance v2 API to show image +and images schema. The latter three test cases evaluate the ability to use Glance +v2 API to show images with a deleted image id, a null image id and a non-existing +image id. Specifically it verifies that: + +* Glance image get API can show the image and images schema. +* Glance image get API can't show an image with a deleted image id. +* Glance image get API can't show an image with a null image id. +* Glance image get API can't show an image with a non-existing image id. + +In order to pass this test, all test assertions listed in the test execution above need to pass. + +Post conditions +--------------- + +None + +-------------------------------------- +CRUD image operations in Images API v2 +-------------------------------------- + +Test case specification +----------------------- + +tempest.api.image.v2.test_images.ListImagesTest.test_list_no_params + tempest.api.image.v2.test_images.ListImagesTest.test_index_no_params +tempest.api.image.v2.test_images.ListUserImagesTest.test_list_no_params + +Note: the latter two test cases are the alias of the former one. Alias should +always be included so that the test run will be tempest version agnostic, +which can be used to test different version of Openstack. + +Test preconditions +------------------ + +Glance is available. + +Basic test flow execution description and pass/fail criteria +------------------------------------------------------------ + +Test execution +'''''''''''''' + +* Test action 1: Create 6 images and store their ids in a created images list. +* Test action 2: List all images and check whether the ids listed are in the created images list. +* **Test assertion 1:** The ids get from the list images API are in the created images list. + +Pass / fail criteria +'''''''''''''''''''' + +This test case evaluates the ability to use Glance v2 API to list images. +Specifically it verifies that: + +* Glance image API can show the images. + +In order to pass this test, all test assertions listed in the test execution above need to pass. + +Post conditions +--------------- + +None + +---------------------------------------- +Image list tests using the Glance v2 API +---------------------------------------- + +Test case specification +----------------------- + tempest.api.image.v2.test_images.ListImagesTest.test_list_images_param_container_format tempest.api.image.v2.test_images.ListImagesTest.test_list_images_param_disk_format tempest.api.image.v2.test_images.ListImagesTest.test_list_images_param_limit @@ -27,9 +201,7 @@ tempest.api.image.v2.test_images.ListImagesTest.test_list_images_param_min_max_s tempest.api.image.v2.test_images.ListImagesTest.test_list_images_param_size tempest.api.image.v2.test_images.ListImagesTest.test_list_images_param_status tempest.api.image.v2.test_images.ListImagesTest.test_list_images_param_visibility -tempest.api.image.v2.test_images.ListImagesTest.test_list_no_params -tempest.api.image.v2.test_images.ListUserImagesTest.test_get_image_schema -tempest.api.image.v2.test_images.ListUserImagesTest.test_get_images_schema + tempest.api.image.v2.test_images.ListUserImagesTest.test_list_images_param_container_format tempest.api.image.v2.test_images.ListUserImagesTest.test_list_images_param_disk_format tempest.api.image.v2.test_images.ListUserImagesTest.test_list_images_param_limit @@ -37,12 +209,198 @@ tempest.api.image.v2.test_images.ListUserImagesTest.test_list_images_param_min_m tempest.api.image.v2.test_images.ListUserImagesTest.test_list_images_param_size tempest.api.image.v2.test_images.ListUserImagesTest.test_list_images_param_status tempest.api.image.v2.test_images.ListUserImagesTest.test_list_images_param_visibility -tempest.api.image.v2.test_images.ListUserImagesTest.test_list_no_params + +Note: the latter 7 test cases are the alias of the former 7, respectively. +Alias should always be included so that the test run will be tempest version agnostic, +which can be used to test different version of Openstack. + +Test preconditions +------------------ + +Glance is available. + +Basic test flow execution description and pass/fail criteria +------------------------------------------------------------ + +Test execution +'''''''''''''' + +* Test action 1: Create 6 images with a random size ranging from 1024 to 4096 and + visibility 'private'; set their (container_format, disk_format) pair to be + (ami, ami), (ami, ari), (ami, aki), (ami, vhd), (ami, vmdk) and (ami, raw); + store their ids in a list and upload the binary images data. +* Test action 2: Use Glance v2 API to list all images whose container_format is 'ami' + and store the response details in a list. +* **Test assertion 1:** The list is not empty and all the values of container_format + in the list are 'ami'. +* Test action 3: Use Glance v2 API to list all images whose disk_format is 'raw' + and store the response details in a list. +* **Test assertion 2:** The list is not empty and all the values of disk_format + in the list are 'raw'. +* Test action 4: Use Glance v2 API to list one image by setting limit to be 1 and + store the response details in a list. +* **Test assertion 3:** The length of the list is one. +* Test action 5: Use Glance v2 API to list images by setting size_min and size_max, + and store the response images' sizes in a list. Choose the first image's size as + the median, size_min is median-500 and size_max is median+500. +* **Test assertion 4:** All sizes in the list are no less than size_min and no more + than size_max. +* Test action 6: Use Glance v2 API to show the first created image with its id and + get its size from the response. Use Glance v2 API to list images whose size is equal + to this size and store the response details in a list. +* **Test assertion 5:** All sizes of the images in the list are equal to the size + used to list the images. +* Test action 7: Use Glance v2 API to list the images whose status is active and + store the response details in a list. +* **Test assertion 6:** All status of images in the list are active. +* Test action 8: Use Glance v2 API to list the images whose visibility is private and + store the response details in a list. +* **Test assertion 7:** All images' values of visibility in the list are private. +* Test action 9: Delete the 6 images with the stored ids. Show images and check whether + the 6 ids are not in the show list. +* **Test assertion 8:** The stored 6 ids are not found in the show list. + +Pass / fail criteria +'''''''''''''''''''' + +This test case evaluates the ability to use Glance v2 API to list images with +different parameters. Specifically it verifies that: + +* Glance image API can show the images with the container_format. +* Glance image API can show the images with the disk_format. +* Glance image API can show the images by setting a limit number. +* Glance image API can show the images with the size_min and size_max. +* Glance image API can show the images with the size. +* Glance image API can show the images with the status. +* Glance image API can show the images with the visibility type. + +In order to pass this test, all test assertions listed in the test execution above need to pass. + +Post conditions +--------------- + +None + +------------------------------------------ +Image update tests using the Glance v2 API +------------------------------------------ + +Test case specification +----------------------- + +tempest.api.image.v2.test_images.BasicOperationsImagesTest.test_update_image +tempest.api.image.v2.test_images_tags.ImagesTagsTest.test_update_delete_tags_for_image +tempest.api.image.v2.test_images_tags_negative.ImagesTagsNegativeTest.test_update_tags_for_non_existing_image + +Test preconditions +------------------ + +Glance is available. + +Basic test flow execution description and pass/fail criteria +------------------------------------------------------------ + +Test execution +'''''''''''''' + +* Test action 1: Create an image with container_formats 'ami', disk_formats 'ami' + and visibility 'private' and store its id returned in the response. Check whether + the status of the created image is 'queued'. +* **Test assertion 1:** The status of the created image is 'queued'. +* Test action 2: Use the stored image id to upload the binary image data and update + this image's name. Show this image with the stored id. Check if the stored id and + name used to update the image are equal to the id and name in the show list. +* **Test assertion 2:** The id and name returned in the show list are equal to + the stored id and name used to update the image. +* Test action 3: Create an image with container_formats 'bare', disk_formats 'raw' + and visibility 'private' and store its id returned in the response. +* Test action 4: Use the stored id to add a tag. Show the image with the stored id + and check if the tag used to add is in the image's tags returned in the show list. +* **Test assertion 3:** The tag used to add into the image is in the show list. +* Test action 5: Use the stored id to delete this tag. Show the image with the + stored id and check if the tag used to delete is not in the show list. +* **Test assertion 4:** The tag used to delete from the image is not in the show list. +* Test action 6: Generate a random uuid as the image id. Use the image id to add a tag + into the image's tags. +* **Test assertion 5:** The API's response code is 404. +* Test action 7: Delete the images created in test action 1 and 3. Show the images + and check whether the ids are not in the show list. +* **Test assertion 6:** The two ids are not found in the show list. + +Pass / fail criteria +'''''''''''''''''''' + +This test case evaluates the ability to use Glance v2 API to update images with +different parameters. Specifically it verifies that: + +* Glance image API can update image's name with the existing image id. +* Glance image API can update image's tags with the existing image id. +* Glance image API can't update image's tags with a non-existing image id. + +In order to pass this test, all test assertions listed in the test execution above need to pass. + +Post conditions +--------------- + +None + +-------------------------------------------- +Image deletion tests using the Glance v2 API +-------------------------------------------- + +Test case specification +----------------------- + +tempest.api.image.v2.test_images.BasicOperationsImagesTest.test_delete_image tempest.api.image.v2.test_images_negative.ImagesNegativeTest.test_delete_image_null_id tempest.api.image.v2.test_images_negative.ImagesNegativeTest.test_delete_non_existing_image -tempest.api.image.v2.test_images_negative.ImagesNegativeTest.test_get_delete_deleted_image -tempest.api.image.v2.test_images_negative.ImagesNegativeTest.test_get_image_null_id -tempest.api.image.v2.test_images_negative.ImagesNegativeTest.test_get_non_existent_image -tempest.api.image.v2.test_images_tags.ImagesTagsTest.test_update_delete_tags_for_image tempest.api.image.v2.test_images_tags_negative.ImagesTagsNegativeTest.test_delete_non_existing_tag -tempest.api.image.v2.test_images_tags_negative.ImagesTagsNegativeTest.test_update_tags_for_non_existing_image + +Test preconditions +------------------ + +Glance is available. + +Basic test flow execution description and pass/fail criteria +------------------------------------------------------------ + +Test execution +'''''''''''''' + +* Test action 1: Create an image with container_formats 'ami', disk_formats 'ami' + and visibility 'private'. Use the id of the created image to delete the image. + List all images and check whether this id is in the list. +* **Test assertion 1:** The id of the created image is not found in the list + of all images after the deletion operation. +* Test action 2: Delete images with a null id and check the API's response code. +* **Test assertion 2:** The API's response code is 404. +* Test action 3: Generate a random uuid and delete images with this uuid as image id. + Check the API's response code. +* **Test assertion 3:** The API's response code is 404. +* Test action 4: Create an image with container_formats 'bare', disk_formats 'raw' + and visibility 'private'. Delete this image's tag with the image id and a random tag + Check the API's response code. +* **Test assertion 4:** The API's response code is 404. +* Test action 5: Delete the images created in test action 1 and 4. List all images + and check whether the ids are in the list. +* **Test assertion 5:** The two ids are not found in the list. + +Pass / fail criteria +'''''''''''''''''''' + +The first three test cases evaluate the ability to use Glance v2 API to delete images +with an existing image id, a null image id and a non-existing image id. The last one +evaluates the ability to use the API to delete a non-existing image tag. +Specifically it verifies that: + +* Glance image deletion API can delete the image with an existing id. +* Glance image deletion API can't delete an image with a null image id. +* Glance image deletion API can't delete an image with a non-existing image id. +* Glance image deletion API can't delete an image tag with a non-existing image tag. + +In order to pass this test, all test assertions listed in the test execution above need to pass. + +Post conditions +--------------- + +None diff --git a/docs/testing/user/testspecification/vimoperationsnetwork/index.rst b/docs/testing/user/testspecification/vimoperationsnetwork/index.rst index 252513ee..47c08ef2 100644 --- a/docs/testing/user/testspecification/vimoperationsnetwork/index.rst +++ b/docs/testing/user/testspecification/vimoperationsnetwork/index.rst @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ .. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. .. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 -.. (c) Ericsson AB +.. (c) Ericsson AB, Huawei Technologies Co.,Ltd ========================================= VIM network operations test specification @@ -9,19 +9,105 @@ VIM network operations test specification .. toctree:: :maxdepth: 2 -Each test case requires documentation according to: -* Use case specification -* Test preconditions -* Basic test flow execution descriptor -* Post conditions and pass fail criteria +Scope +===== + +The VIM network test area evaluates the ability of the system under test to support +VIM network operations. The test cases documented here are the network API test cases +in the Openstack Interop guideline 2016.8 as implemented by the Refstack client. +These test cases will evaluate basic Openstack (as a VIM) network operations including +basic CRUD operations on L2 networks, L2 network ports and security groups. + +References +========== + +- Defcore test cases + + - https://github.com/openstack/interop/blob/master/2016.08.json + +- Refstack client + + - https://github.com/openstack/refstack-client + +Definitions and abbreviations +============================= + +The following terms and abbreviations are used in conjunction with this test area + +- API - Application Programming Interface +- CRUD - Create, Read, Update and Delete +- NFVi - Network Functions Virtualization infrastructure +- VIM - Virtual Infrastructure Manager + +System Under Test (SUT) +======================= + +The system under test is assumed to be the NFVi and VIM in operation on a +Pharos compliant infrastructure. + +Test Area Structure +==================== + +The test area is structured based on VIM network operations. Each test case is able +to run independently, i.e. irrelevant of the state created by a previous test. +Specifically, every test performs clean-up operations which return the system to +the same state as before the test. + +For brevity, the test cases in this test area are summarized together based on +the operations they are testing. + +Test Descriptions +================= + +API Used and Reference +---------------------- + +Network: http://developer.openstack.org/api-ref/networking/v2/index.html + +- create network +- update network +- list networks +- show network details +- delete network + +- create subnet +- update subnet +- list subnets +- show subnet details +- delete subnet + +- create port +- bulk create ports +- update port +- list ports +- show port details +- delete port + +- create security group +- update security group +- list security groups +- show security group +- delete security group + +- create security group rule +- list security group rules +- show security group rule +- delete security group rule + +--------------------------------------------------------- +Basic CRUD operations on L2 networks and L2 network ports +--------------------------------------------------------- + +Test case specification +----------------------- -tempest.api.network.test_networks.NetworksTest.test_create_delete_subnet_all_attributes tempest.api.network.test_networks.NetworksTest.test_create_delete_subnet_with_allocation_pools tempest.api.network.test_networks.NetworksTest.test_create_delete_subnet_with_dhcp_enabled tempest.api.network.test_networks.NetworksTest.test_create_delete_subnet_with_gw tempest.api.network.test_networks.NetworksTest.test_create_delete_subnet_with_gw_and_allocation_pools tempest.api.network.test_networks.NetworksTest.test_create_delete_subnet_with_host_routes_and_dns_nameservers tempest.api.network.test_networks.NetworksTest.test_create_delete_subnet_without_gateway +tempest.api.network.test_networks.NetworksTest.test_create_delete_subnet_all_attributes tempest.api.network.test_networks.NetworksTest.test_create_update_delete_network_subnet tempest.api.network.test_networks.NetworksTest.test_delete_network_with_subnet tempest.api.network.test_networks.NetworksTest.test_list_networks @@ -33,13 +119,23 @@ tempest.api.network.test_networks.NetworksTest.test_show_network_fields tempest.api.network.test_networks.NetworksTest.test_show_subnet tempest.api.network.test_networks.NetworksTest.test_show_subnet_fields tempest.api.network.test_networks.NetworksTest.test_update_subnet_gw_dns_host_routes_dhcp -tempest.api.network.test_networks.NetworksTestJSON.test_create_delete_subnet_all_attributes +tempest.api.network.test_ports.PortsTestJSON.test_create_bulk_port +tempest.api.network.test_ports.PortsTestJSON.test_create_port_in_allowed_allocation_pools +tempest.api.network.test_ports.PortsTestJSON.test_create_update_delete_port +tempest.api.network.test_ports.PortsTestJSON.test_list_ports +tempest.api.network.test_ports.PortsTestJSON.test_list_ports_fields +tempest.api.network.test_ports.PortsTestJSON.test_show_port +tempest.api.network.test_ports.PortsTestJSON.test_show_port_fields +tempest.api.network.test_ports.PortsTestJSON.test_update_port_with_security_group_and_extra_attributes +tempest.api.network.test_ports.PortsTestJSON.test_update_port_with_two_security_groups_and_extra_attributes + tempest.api.network.test_networks.NetworksTestJSON.test_create_delete_subnet_with_allocation_pools tempest.api.network.test_networks.NetworksTestJSON.test_create_delete_subnet_with_dhcp_enabled tempest.api.network.test_networks.NetworksTestJSON.test_create_delete_subnet_with_gw tempest.api.network.test_networks.NetworksTestJSON.test_create_delete_subnet_with_gw_and_allocation_pools tempest.api.network.test_networks.NetworksTestJSON.test_create_delete_subnet_with_host_routes_and_dns_nameservers tempest.api.network.test_networks.NetworksTestJSON.test_create_delete_subnet_without_gateway +tempest.api.network.test_networks.NetworksTestJSON.test_create_delete_subnet_all_attributes tempest.api.network.test_networks.NetworksTestJSON.test_create_update_delete_network_subnet tempest.api.network.test_networks.NetworksTestJSON.test_delete_network_with_subnet tempest.api.network.test_networks.NetworksTestJSON.test_list_networks @@ -51,15 +147,143 @@ tempest.api.network.test_networks.NetworksTestJSON.test_show_network_fields tempest.api.network.test_networks.NetworksTestJSON.test_show_subnet tempest.api.network.test_networks.NetworksTestJSON.test_show_subnet_fields tempest.api.network.test_networks.NetworksTestJSON.test_update_subnet_gw_dns_host_routes_dhcp -tempest.api.network.test_ports.PortsTestJSON.test_create_bulk_port -tempest.api.network.test_ports.PortsTestJSON.test_create_port_in_allowed_allocation_pools -tempest.api.network.test_ports.PortsTestJSON.test_create_update_delete_port -tempest.api.network.test_ports.PortsTestJSON.test_list_ports -tempest.api.network.test_ports.PortsTestJSON.test_list_ports_fields -tempest.api.network.test_ports.PortsTestJSON.test_show_port -tempest.api.network.test_ports.PortsTestJSON.test_show_port_fields -tempest.api.network.test_ports.PortsTestJSON.test_update_port_with_security_group_and_extra_attributes -tempest.api.network.test_ports.PortsTestJSON.test_update_port_with_two_security_groups_and_extra_attributes + +Note: the latter 18 test cases are the alias of the former first 18, respectively. +Alias should always be included so that the test run will be tempest version agnostic, +which can be used to test different version of Openstack. + +Test preconditions +------------------ + +Neutron is available. + +Basic test flow execution description and pass/fail criteria +------------------------------------------------------------ + +Test execution +'''''''''''''' + +* Test action 1: Create a network and create a subnet of this network by setting + allocation_pools, then check the details of the subnet and delete the subnet and network +* **Test assertion 1:** The allocation_pools returned in the response equals to the one used + to create the subnet, and the network and subnet ids are not found after deletion +* Test action 2: Create a network and create a subnet of this network by setting + enable_dhcp "True", then check the details of the subnet and delete the subnet and network +* **Test assertion 2:** The enable_dhcp returned in the response is "True" and the network + and subnet ids are not found after deletion +* Test action 3: Create a network and create a subnet of this network by setting + gateway_ip, then check the details of the subnet and delete the subnet and network +* **Test assertion 3:** The gateway_ip returned in the response equals to the one used to + create the subnet, and the network and subnet ids are not found after deletion +* Test action 4: Create a network and create a subnet of this network by setting allocation_pools + and gateway_ip, then check the details of the subnet and delete the subnet and network +* **Test assertion 4:** The allocation_pools and gateway_ip returned in the response equal to + the ones used to create the subnet, and the network and subnet ids are not found after deletion +* Test action 5: Create a network and create a subnet of this network by setting host_routes and + dns_nameservers, then check the details of the subnet and delete the subnet and network +* **Test assertion 5:** The host_routes and dns_nameservers returned in the response equal to + the ones used to create the subnet, and the network and subnet ids are not found after deletion +* Test action 6: Create a network and create a subnet of this network without setting + gateway_ip, then delete the subnet and network +* **Test assertion 6:** The network and subnet ids are not found after deletion +* Test action 7: Create a network and create a subnet of this network by setting enable_dhcp "true", + gateway_ip, ip_version, cidr, host_routes, allocation_pools and dns_nameservers, + then check the details of the subnet and delete the subnet and network +* **Test assertion 7:** The values returned in the response equal to the ones used to + create the subnet, and the network and subnet ids are not found after deletion +* Test action 8: Create a network and update this network's name, then create a subnet and update + this subnet's name, delete the subnet and network +* **Test assertion 8:** The network's status and subnet's status are both 'ACTIVE' after creation, + their names equal to the new names used to update, and the network and subnet ids are not + found after deletion +* Test action 9: Create a network and create a subnet of this network, then delete this network +* **Test assertion 9:** The subnet has also been deleted after deleting the network +* Test action 10: Create a network and list all networks +* **Test assertion 10:** The network created is found in the list +* Test action 11: Create a network and list networks with the id and name of the created network +* **Test assertion 11:** The id and name of the list network equal to the created network's id and name +* Test action 12: Create a network and create a subnet of this network, then list all subnets +* **Test assertion 12:** The subnet created is found in the list +* Test action 13: Create a network and create a subnet of this network, then list subnets with + the id and network_id of the created subnet +* **Test assertion 13:** The id and network_id of the list subnet equal to the created subnet +* Test action 14: Create a network and show network's details with the id of the created network +* **Test assertion 14:** The id and name returned in the response equal to the created network's id and name +* Test action 15: Create a network and just show network's id and name info with the id of the created network +* **Test assertion 15:** The keys returned in the response are only id and name, and the values + of all the keys equal to network's id and name +* Test action 16: Create a network and create a subnet of this network, then show subnet's details + with the id of the created subnet +* **Test assertion 16:** The id and cidr info returned in the response equal to the created + subnet's id and cidr +* Test action 17: Create a network and create a subnet of this network, then show subnet's id and + network_id info with the id of the created subnet +* **Test assertion 17:** The keys returned in the response are just id and network_id, and the values + of all the keys equal to subnet's id and network_id +* Test action 18: Create a network and create a subnet of this network, then update subnet's + name, host_routes, dns_nameservers and gateway_ip +* **Test assertion 18:** The name, host_routes, dns_nameservers and gateway_ip returned in the + response equal to the values used to update the subnet +* Test action 19: Create 2 networks and bulk create 2 ports with the ids of the created networks +* **Test assertion 19:** The network_id of each port equals to the one used to create the port and + the admin_state_up of each port is True +* Test action 20: Create a network and create a subnet of this network by setting allocation_pools, + then create a port with the created network's id +* **Test assertion 20:** The ip_address of the created port is in the range of the allocation_pools +* Test action 21: Create a network and create a port with its id, then update the port's name and + set its admin_state_up to be False +* **Test assertion 21:** The name returned in the response equals to the name used to update + the port and the port's admin_state_up is False +* Test action 22: Create a network and create a port with its id, then list all ports +* **Test assertion 22:** The created port is found in the list +* Test action 23: Create a network and create a port with its id, then list ports with the id + and mac_address of the created port +* **Test assertion 23:** The created port is found in the list +* Test action 24: Create a network and create a port with its id, then show the port's details +* **Test assertion 24:** The key 'id' is in the details +* Test action 25: Create a network and create a port with its id, then show the port's id + and mac_address info with the port's id +* **Test assertion 25:** The keys returned in the response are just id and mac_address, + and the values of all the keys equal to port's id and mac_address +* Test action 26: Create a network, 2 subnets (SUBNET1 and SUBNET2) and 2 security groups + (SG1 and SG2), create a port with SG1 and SUBNET1, then update the port's security group to SG2 + and its subnet_id to SUBNET2 +* **Test assertion 26:** The port's subnet_id equals to SUBNET2's id and its security_group_ids + equals to SG2's id +* Test action 27: Create a network, 2 subnets (SUBNET1 and SUBNET2) and 3 security groups + (SG1, SG2 and SG3), create a port with SG1 and SUBNET1, then update the port's security group to + SG2 and SG3 and its subnet_id to SUBNET2 +* **Test assertion 27:** The port's subnet_id equal to SUBNET2's id and its security_group_ids + equals to the ids of SG2 and SG3 + +Pass / fail criteria +'''''''''''''''''''' + +These test cases evaluate the ability of basic CRUD operations on L2 networks and L2 network ports. +Specifically it verifies that: + +* Subnets can be created successfully by setting different parameters. +* Subnets can be updated after being created. +* Ports can be bulk created with network ids. +* Port's security group(s) can be updated after being created. +* Networks/subnets/ports can be listed with their ids and other parameters. +* All details or special fields' info of networks/subnets/ports can be shown with their ids. +* Networks/subnets/ports can be successfully deleted. + +In order to pass this test, all test assertions listed in the test execution above need to pass. + +Post conditions +--------------- + +N/A + +---------------------------------------- +Basic CRUD operations on security groups +---------------------------------------- + +Test case specification +----------------------- + tempest.api.network.test_security_groups.SecGroupTest.test_create_list_update_show_delete_security_group tempest.api.network.test_security_groups.SecGroupTest.test_create_security_group_rule_with_additional_args tempest.api.network.test_security_groups.SecGroupTest.test_create_security_group_rule_with_icmp_type_code @@ -79,3 +303,86 @@ tempest.api.network.test_security_groups_negative.NegativeSecGroupTest.test_crea tempest.api.network.test_security_groups_negative.NegativeSecGroupTest.test_delete_non_existent_security_group tempest.api.network.test_security_groups_negative.NegativeSecGroupTest.test_show_non_existent_security_group tempest.api.network.test_security_groups_negative.NegativeSecGroupTest.test_show_non_existent_security_group_rule + +Test preconditions +------------------ + +Neutron is available. + +Basic test flow execution description and pass/fail criteria +------------------------------------------------------------ + +Test execution +'''''''''''''' + +* Test action 1: Create a security group SG1, list all security groups, update the name and description + of SG1, show details of SG1 and delete SG1 +* **Test assertion 1:** SG1 is in the list, the name and description of SG1 equal to the ones used to + update it, the name and description of SG1 shown in the details equal to the ones used to update it, + and SG1's id is not found after deletion +* Test action 2: Create a security group SG1, and create a rule with protocol 'tcp', + port_range_min and port_range_max +* **Test assertion 2:** The values returned in the response equal to the ones used to create the rule +* Test action 3: Create a security group SG1, and create a rule with protocol 'icmp' and icmp_type_codes +* **Test assertion 3:** The values returned in the response equal to the ones used to create the rule +* Test action 4: Create a security group SG1, and create a rule with protocol '17' +* **Test assertion 4:** The values returned in the response equal to the ones used to create the rule +* Test action 5: Create a security group SG1, and create a rule with protocol 'udp', port_range_min, + port_range_max and remote_group_id +* **Test assertion 5:** The values returned in the response equal to the ones used to create the rule +* Test action 6: Create a security group SG1, and create a rule with protocol 'tcp', port_range_min, + port_range_max and remote_ip_prefix +* **Test assertion 6:** The values returned in the response equal to the ones used to create the rule +* Test action 7: Create a security group SG1, create 3 rules with protocol 'tcp', 'udp' and 'icmp' + respectively, show details of each rule, list all rules and delete all rules +* **Test assertion 7:** The values in the shown details equal to the ones used to create the rule, + all rules are found in the list, and all rules are not found after deletion +* Test action 8: List all security groups +* **Test assertion 8:** There is one default security group in the list +* Test action 9: Create a security group whose name is 'default' +* **Test assertion 9:** Failed to create this security group because of name conflict +* Test action 10: Create a security group SG1, create a rule with protocol 'tcp', port_range_min + and port_range_max, and create another tcp rule with the same parameters +* **Test assertion 10:** Failed to create this security group rule because of duplicate protocol +* Test action 11: Create a security group SG1, and create a rule with ethertype 'bad_ethertype' +* **Test assertion 11:** Failed to create this security group rule because of bad ethertype +* Test action 12: Create a security group SG1, and create a rule with protocol 'bad_protocol_name' +* **Test assertion 12:** Failed to create this security group rule because of bad protocol +* Test action 13: Create a security group SG1, and create a rule with remote_ip_prefix '92.168.1./24', + '192.168.1.1/33', 'bad_prefix' and '256' respectively +* **Test assertion 13:** Failed to create these security group rules because of bad remote_ip_prefix +* Test action 14: Create a security group SG1, and create a tcp rule with (port_range_min, port_range_max) + (-16, 80), (80, 79), (80, 65536), (None, 6) and (-16, 65536) respectively +* **Test assertion 14:** Failed to create these security group rules because of bad ports +* Test action 15: Create a security group SG1, and create a tcp rule with remote_group_id 'bad_group_id' + and a random uuid respectively +* **Test assertion 15:** Failed to create these security group rules because of nonexistent remote_group_id +* Test action 16: Create a security group SG1, and create a rule with a random uuid as security_group_id +* **Test assertion 16:** Failed to create these security group rules because of nonexistent security_group_id +* Test action 17: Generate a random uuid and use this id to delete security group +* **Test assertion 17:** Failed to delete security group because of nonexistent security_group_id +* Test action 18: Generate a random uuid and use this id to show security group +* **Test assertion 18:** Failed to show security group because of nonexistent id of security group +* Test action 19: Generate a random uuid and use this id to show security group rule +* **Test assertion 19:** Failed to show security group rule because of nonexistent id of security group rule + +Pass / fail criteria +'''''''''''''''''''' + +These test cases evaluate the ability of Basic CRUD operations on security groups and security group rules. +Specifically it verifies that: + +* Security groups can be created, list, updated, shown and deleted. +* Security group rules can be created with different parameters, list, shown and deleted. +* Cannot create an additional default security group. +* Cannot create a duplicate security group rules. +* Cannot create security group rules with bad ethertype, protocol, remote_ip_prefix, ports, + remote_group_id and security_group_id. +* Cannot show or delete security groups or security group rules with nonexistent ids. + +In order to pass this test, all test assertions listed in the test execution above need to pass. + +Post conditions +--------------- + +N/A diff --git a/docs/testing/user/testspecification/vimoperationsvolume/index.rst b/docs/testing/user/testspecification/vimoperationsvolume/index.rst index ce039a5b..9a76c37c 100644 --- a/docs/testing/user/testspecification/vimoperationsvolume/index.rst +++ b/docs/testing/user/testspecification/vimoperationsvolume/index.rst @@ -1,36 +1,512 @@ .. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. .. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 -.. (c) Ericsson AB +.. (c) Ericsson AB, Huawei Technologies Co.,Ltd -======================================== +========================================= VIM volume operations test specification -======================================== +========================================= .. toctree:: :maxdepth: 2 -Each test case requires documentation according to: -* Use case specification -* Test preconditions -* Basic test flow execution descriptor -* Post conditions and pass fail criteria +Scope +===== + +The VIM volume operations test area evaluates the ability of the system under +test to support VIM volume operations. The test cases documented here are the +volume API test cases in the OpenStack Interop guideline 2016.8 as implemented +by the RefStack client. These test cases will evaluate basic OpenStack (as a VIM) +volume operations, including: + +- Volume attach and detach operations +- Volume service availability zone operations +- Volume cloning operations +- Image copy-to-volume operations +- Volume creation and deletion operations +- Volume service extension listing +- Volume metadata operations +- Volume snapshot operations + +References +================ + +- OpenStack Governance/Interop + + - https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Governance/InteropWG + +- Defcore test cases + + - https://github.com/openstack/interop/blob/master/2016.08.json + +- Refstack client + + - https://github.com/openstack/refstack-client + +Definitions and abbreviations +============================= + +The following terms and abbreviations are used in conjunction with this test area + +- API - Application Programming Interface +- NFVi - Network Functions Virtualization infrastructure +- SUT - System Under Test +- VIM - Virtual Infrastructure Manager +- VM - Virtual Machine + +System Under Test (SUT) +======================= + +The system under test is assumed to be the NFVI and VIM deployed with a Pharos compliant infrastructure. + +Test Area Structure +==================== + +The test area is structured based on VIM volume API operations. Each test case is +able to run independently, i.e. irrelevant of the state created by a previous test. +Specifically, every test performs clean-up operations which return the system to +the same state as before the test. + +For brevity, the test cases in this test area are summarized together based on +the operations they are testing. + +Test Descriptions +================= + +API Used and Reference +---------------------- + +Block storage: https://developer.openstack.org/api-ref/block-storage + +- create volume +- delete volume +- update volume +- attach volume to server +- detach volume from server +- create volume metadata +- update volume metadata +- delete volume metadata +- list volume + +- create snapshot +- update snapshot +- delete snapshot + +------------------------------------------------------------------------ +Test Case 1 - Volume attach and detach operations with the Cinder v2 API +------------------------------------------------------------------------ + +Test case specification +----------------------- -tempest.api.volume.test_availability_zone.AvailabilityZoneV2TestJSON.test_get_availability_zone_list -tempest.api.volume.test_extensions.ExtensionsV2TestJSON.test_list_extensions -tempest.api.volume.test_snapshot_metadata.SnapshotV2MetadataTestJSON.test_create_get_delete_snapshot_metadata -tempest.api.volume.test_snapshot_metadata.SnapshotV2MetadataTestJSON.test_crud_snapshot_metadata -tempest.api.volume.test_snapshot_metadata.SnapshotV2MetadataTestJSON.test_update_snapshot_metadata_item -tempest.api.volume.test_volume_metadata.VolumesV2MetadataTest.test_create_get_delete_volume_metadata -tempest.api.volume.test_volume_metadata.VolumesV2MetadataTest.test_crud_volume_metadata -tempest.api.volume.test_volume_metadata.VolumesV2MetadataTest.test_update_volume_metadata_item tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_actions.VolumesV2ActionsTest.test_attach_detach_volume_to_instance tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_actions.VolumesV2ActionsTest.test_get_volume_attachment -tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_actions.VolumesV2ActionsTest.test_reserve_unreserve_volume -tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_actions.VolumesV2ActionsTest.test_volume_bootable -tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_actions.VolumesV2ActionsTest.test_volume_readonly_update -tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_get.VolumesV2GetTest.test_volume_create_get_update_delete +tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_negative.VolumesV2NegativeTest.test_attach_volumes_with_nonexistent_volume_id +tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_negative.VolumesV2NegativeTest.test_detach_volumes_with_invalid_volume_id + +Test preconditions +------------------ + +* Volume extension API + +Basic test flow execution description and pass/fail criteria +------------------------------------------------------------ + +Test execution +'''''''''''''' +* Test action 1: Create a server VM1 +* Test action 2: Attach a provided VOL1 to VM1 +* **Test assertion 1:** Verify VOL1 is in 'in-use' status +* Test action 3: Detach VOL1 from VM1 +* **Test assertion 2:** Verify VOL1 is in 'available' status +* Test action 4: Create a server VM2 +* Test action 5: Attach a provided VOL2 to VM2 and wait for VOL2 to reach 'in-use' status +* Test action 6: Retrieve VOL2's attachment information ATTCH_INFO +* **Test assertion 3:** Verify ATTCH_INFO is correct +* Test action 7: Create a server VM3 and wait for VM3 to reach 'ACTIVE' status +* Test action 8: Attach a non-existent volume to VM3 +* **Test assertion 4:** Verify attach volume failed, a 'NOT FOUND' error is returned in the response +* Test action 9: Detach a volume from a server by using an invalid volume ID +* **Test assertion 5:** Verify detach volume failed, a 'NOT FOUND' error is returned in the response + +Pass / fail criteria +'''''''''''''''''''' + +This test evaluates the volume API ability of attaching a volume to a server +and detaching a volume from a server. Specifically, the test verifies that: + +* Volumes can be attached and detached from servers. +* Volume attachment information can be retrieved. +* Attach and detach a volume using an invalid volume ID is not allowed. + +In order to pass this test, all test assertions listed in the test execution above need to pass. + +Post conditions +--------------- + +N/A + +-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- +Test Case 2 - Volume service availability zone operations with the Cinder v2 API +-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- + +Test case specification +----------------------- + +tempest.api.volume.test_availability_zone.AvailabilityZoneV2TestJSON.test_get_availability_zone_list + +tempest.api.volume.test_availability_zone.AvailabilityZoneTestJSON.test_get_availability_zone_list + +Note: the second test case is the alias of the first one. +Alias should always be included so that the test run will be tempest version agnostic, +which can be used to test different version of Openstack. + +Test preconditions +------------------ + +* Volume extension API + +Basic test flow execution description and pass/fail criteria +------------------------------------------------------------ + +Test execution +'''''''''''''' +* Test action 1: List all existent availability zones +* **Test assertion 1:** Verify the availability zone list length is greater than 0 + +Pass / fail criteria +'''''''''''''''''''' + +This test case evaluates the volume API ability of listing availability zones. +Specifically, the test verifies that: + +* Availability zones can be listed. + +In order to pass this test, all test assertions listed in the test execution above need to pass. + +Post conditions +--------------- + +N/A + +-------------------------------------------------------------- +Test Case 3 - Volume cloning operations with the Cinder v2 API +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +Test case specification +----------------------- + tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_get.VolumesV2GetTest.test_volume_create_get_update_delete_as_clone + +tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_get.VolumesGetTest.test_volume_create_get_update_delete_as_clone + +Note: the second test case is the alias of the first one. +Alias should always be included so that the test run will be tempest version agnostic, +which can be used to test different version of Openstack. + +Test preconditions +------------------ + +* Volume extension API +* Cinder volume clones feature is enabled + +Basic test flow execution description and pass/fail criteria +------------------------------------------------------------ + +Test execution +'''''''''''''' +* Test action 1: Create a volume VOL1 +* Test action 2: Create a volume VOL2 from source volume VOL1 with a specific name and metadata +* Test action 2: Wait for VOL2 to reach 'available' status +* **Test assertion 1:** Verify the name of VOL2 is correct +* Test action 3: Retrieve VOL2's detail information +* **Test assertion 2:** Verify the retrieved volume name, ID and metadata are the same as VOL2 +* **Test assertion 3:** Verify VOL2's bootable flag is 'False' +* Test action 4: Update the name of VOL2 with the original value +* Test action 5: Update the name of VOL2 with a new value +* **Test assertion 4:** Verify the name of VOL2 is updated successfully +* Test action 6: Create a volume VOL3 with no name specified and a description contains characters '@#$%^*' +* **Test assertion 5:** Verify VOL3 is created successfully +* Test action 7: Update the name of VOL3 and description with the original value +* **Test assertion 6:** Verify VOL3's bootable flag is 'False' + +Pass / fail criteria +'''''''''''''''''''' + +This test case evaluates the volume API ability of creating a cloned volume from a source volume, +getting cloned volume detail information and updating cloned volume attributes. + +Specifically, the test verifies that: + +* Cloned volume can be created from a source volume. +* Cloned volume detail information can be retrieved. +* Cloned volume detail information can be updated. + +In order to pass this test, all test assertions listed in the test execution above need to pass. + +Post conditions +--------------- + +N/A + +-------------------------------------------------------------------- +Test Case 4 - Image copy-to-volume operations with the Cinder v2 API +-------------------------------------------------------------------- + +Test case specification +----------------------- + +tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_actions.VolumesV2ActionsTest.test_volume_bootable tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_get.VolumesV2GetTest.test_volume_create_get_update_delete_from_image + +tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_get.VolumesActionsTest.test_volume_bootable +tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_get.VolumesGetTest.test_volume_create_get_update_delete_from_image + +Note: the last 2 test cases are the alias of the former 2. +Alias should always be included so that the test run will be tempest version agnostic, +which can be used to test different version of Openstack. + +Test preconditions +------------------ + +* Volume extension API + +Basic test flow execution description and pass/fail criteria +------------------------------------------------------------ + +Test execution +'''''''''''''' +* Test action 1: Set a provided volume VOL1's bootable flag to 'True' +* Test action 2: Retrieve VOL1's bootable flag +* **Test assertion 1:** Verify VOL1's bootable flag is 'True' +* Test action 3: Set a provided volume VOL1's bootable flag to 'False' +* Test action 4: Retrieve VOL1's bootable flag +* **Test assertion 2:** Verify VOL1's bootable flag is 'False' +* Test action 5: Create a bootable volume VOL2 from one image with a specific name and metadata +* Test action 6: Wait for VOL2 to reach 'available' status +* **Test assertion 3:** Verify the name of VOL2 name is correct +* Test action 7: Retrieve VOL2's information +* **Test assertion 4:** Verify the retrieved volume name, ID and metadata are the same as VOL2 +* **Test assertion 5:** Verify VOL2's bootable flag is 'True' +* Test action 8: Update the name of VOL2 with the original value +* Test action 9: Update the name of VOL2 with a new value +* **Test assertion 6:** Verify the name of VOL2 is updated successfully +* Test action 10: Create a volume VOL3 with no name specified and a description contains characters '@#$%^*' +* **Test assertion 7:** Verify VOL3 is created successfully +* Test action 11: Update the name of VOL3 and description with the original value +* **Test assertion 8:** Verify VOL3's bootable flag is 'True' + +Pass / fail criteria +'''''''''''''''''''' + +This test case evaluates the volume API ability of updating volume's bootable flag and creating +a bootable volume from an image, getting bootable volume detail information and updating bootable volume. + +Specifically, the test verifies that: + +* Volume bootable flag can be set and retrieved. +* Bootable volume can be created from a source volume. +* Bootable volume detail information can be retrieved. +* Bootable volume detail information can be updated. + +In order to pass this test, all test assertions listed in the test execution above need to pass. + +Post conditions +--------------- + +N/A + +---------------------------------------------------------------------------- +Test Case 5 - Volume creation and deletion operations with the Cinder v2 API +---------------------------------------------------------------------------- + +Test case specification +----------------------- + +tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_get.VolumesV2GetTest.test_volume_create_get_update_delete +tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_negative.VolumesV2NegativeTest.test_create_volume_with_invalid_size +tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_negative.VolumesV2NegativeTest.test_create_volume_with_nonexistent_source_volid +tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_negative.VolumesV2NegativeTest.test_create_volume_with_nonexistent_volume_type +tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_negative.VolumesV2NegativeTest.test_create_volume_with_out_passing_size +tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_negative.VolumesV2NegativeTest.test_create_volume_with_size_negative +tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_negative.VolumesV2NegativeTest.test_create_volume_with_size_zero + +tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_get.VolumesGetTest.test_volume_create_get_update_delete +tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_negative.VolumesNegativeTest.test_create_volume_with_invalid_size +tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_negative.VolumesNegativeTest.test_create_volume_with_nonexistent_source_volid +tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_negative.VolumesNegativeTest.test_create_volume_with_nonexistent_volume_type + +tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_negative.VolumesV2NegativeTest.test_create_volume_without_passing_size +tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_negative.VolumesNegativeTest.test_create_volume_without_passing_size + +tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_negative.VolumesNegativeTest.test_create_volume_with_size_negative +tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_negative.VolumesNegativeTest.test_create_volume_with_size_zero + +Note: test cases 8 to 11 are the alias of the fist 4 test cases, test cases 12 and 13 are both alias of +test case 5, and test cases 14 and 15 are the alias of the cases 6 and 7, respectively. +Alias should always be included so that the test run will be tempest version agnostic, +which can be used to test different version of OpenStack. + +Test preconditions +------------------ + +* Volume extension API + +Basic test flow execution description and pass/fail criteria +------------------------------------------------------------ + +Test execution +'''''''''''''' +* Test action 1: Create a volume VOL1 with a specific name and metadata +* Test action 2: Wait for VOL1 to reach 'available' status +* **Test assertion 1:** Verify the name of VOL1 is correct +* Test action 3: Retrieve VOL1's information +* **Test assertion 2:** Verify the retrieved volume name, ID and metadata are the same as VOL1 +* **Test assertion 3:** Verify VOL1's bootable flag is 'False' +* Test action 4: Update the name of VOL1 with the original value +* Test action 5: Update the name of VOL1 with a new value +* **Test assertion 4:** Verify the name of VOL1 is updated successfully +* Test action 6: Create a volume VOL2 with no name specified and a description contains characters '@#$%^*' +* **Test assertion 5:** Verify VOL2 is created successfully +* Test action 7: Update the name of VOL2 and description with the original value +* **Test assertion 6:** Verify VOL2's bootable flag is 'False' +* Test action 8: Create a volume with an invalid size '#$%' +* **Test assertion 7:** Verify create volume failed, a bad request error is returned in the response +* Test action 9: Create a volume with a nonexistent source volume +* **Test assertion 8:** Verify create volume failed, a 'Not Found' error is returned in the response +* Test action 10: Create a volume with a nonexistent volume type +* **Test assertion 9:** Verify create volume failed, a 'Not Found' error is returned in the response +* Test action 11: Create a volume without passing a volume size +* **Test assertion 10:** Verify create volume failed, a bad request error is returned in the response +* Test action 12: Create a volume with a negative volume size +* **Test assertion 11:** Verify create volume failed, a bad request error is returned in the response +* Test action 13: Create a volume with volume size '0' +* **Test assertion 12:** Verify create volume failed, a bad request error is returned in the response + +Pass / fail criteria +'''''''''''''''''''' + +This test case evaluates the volume API ability of creating a volume, getting volume +detail information and updating volume, the reference is, +Specifically, the test verifies that: + +* Volume can be created from a source volume. +* Volume detail information can be retrieved/updated. +* Create a volume with an invalid size is not allowed. +* Create a volume with a nonexistent source volume or volume type is not allowed. +* Create a volume without passing a volume size is not allowed. +* Create a volume with a negative volume size is not allowed. +* Create a volume with volume size '0' is not allowed. + +In order to pass this test, all test assertions listed in the test execution above need to pass. + +Post conditions +--------------- + +N/A + +-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- +Test Case 6 - Volume service extension listing operations with the Cinder v2 API +-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- + +Test case specification +----------------------- + +tempest.api.volume.test_extensions.ExtensionsV2TestJSON.test_list_extensions + +tempest.api.volume.test_extensions.ExtensionsTestJSON.test_list_extensions + +Note: the second test case is the alias of the first one. +Alias should always be included so that the test run will be tempest version agnostic, +which can be used to test different version of Openstack. + +Test preconditions +------------------ + +* Volume extension API +* At least one Cinder extension is configured + +Basic test flow execution description and pass/fail criteria +------------------------------------------------------------ + +Test execution +'''''''''''''' + +* Test action 1: List all cinder service extensions +* **Test assertion 1:** Verify all extensions are list in the extension list + +Pass / fail criteria +'''''''''''''''''''' + +This test case evaluates the volume API ability of listing all existent volume service extensions. + +* Cinder service extensions can be listed. + +In order to pass this test, all test assertions listed in the test execution above need to pass. + +Post conditions +--------------- + +N/A + +---------------------------------------------------------- +Test Case 7 - Volume GET operations with the Cinder v2 API +---------------------------------------------------------- + +Test case specification +----------------------- + +tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_negative.VolumesV2NegativeTest.test_get_invalid_volume_id +tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_negative.VolumesV2NegativeTest.test_get_volume_without_passing_volume_id +tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_negative.VolumesV2NegativeTest.test_volume_get_nonexistent_volume_id + +tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_negative.VolumesNegativeTest.test_get_invalid_volume_id +tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_negative.VolumesNegativeTest.test_get_volume_without_passing_volume_id" +tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_negative.VolumesNegativeTest.test_volume_get_nonexistent_volume_id + +Note: the latter 3 test cases is the alias of the first 3 ones. +Alias should always be included so that the test run will be tempest version agnostic, +which can be used to test different version of Openstack. + +Test preconditions +------------------ + +* Volume extension API + +Basic test flow execution description and pass/fail criteria +------------------------------------------------------------ + +Test execution +'''''''''''''' + +* Test action 1: Retrieve a volume with an invalid volume ID +* **Test assertion 1:** Verify retrieve volume failed, a 'Not Found' error is returned in the response +* Test action 2: Retrieve a volume with an empty volume ID +* **Test assertion 2:** Verify retrieve volume failed, a 'Not Found' error is returned in the response +* Test action 3: Retrieve a volume with a nonexistent volume ID +* **Test assertion 3:** Verify retrieve volume failed, a 'Not Found' error is returned in the response + +Pass / fail criteria +'''''''''''''''''''' + +This test case evaluates the volume API ability of getting volumes. +Specifically, the test verifies that: + +* Get a volume with an invalid/an empty/a nonexistent volume ID is not allowed. + +In order to pass this test, all test assertions listed in the test execution above need to pass. + +Post conditions +--------------- + +N/A + +-------------------------------------------------------------- +Test Case 8 - Volume listing operations with the Cinder v2 API +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +Test case specification +----------------------- + tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_list.VolumesV2ListTestJSON.test_volume_list tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_list.VolumesV2ListTestJSON.test_volume_list_by_name tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_list.VolumesV2ListTestJSON.test_volume_list_details_by_name @@ -43,40 +519,475 @@ tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_list.VolumesV2ListTestJSON.test_volumes_list_by_ tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_list.VolumesV2ListTestJSON.test_volumes_list_by_status tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_list.VolumesV2ListTestJSON.test_volumes_list_details_by_availability_zone tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_list.VolumesV2ListTestJSON.test_volumes_list_details_by_status -tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_negative.VolumesV2NegativeTest.test_attach_volumes_with_nonexistent_volume_id -tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_negative.VolumesV2NegativeTest.test_create_volume_with_invalid_size -tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_negative.VolumesV2NegativeTest.test_create_volume_with_nonexistent_snapshot_id -tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_negative.VolumesV2NegativeTest.test_create_volume_with_nonexistent_source_volid -tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_negative.VolumesV2NegativeTest.test_create_volume_with_nonexistent_volume_type -tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_negative.VolumesV2NegativeTest.test_create_volume_with_out_passing_size -tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_negative.VolumesV2NegativeTest.test_create_volume_with_size_negative -tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_negative.VolumesV2NegativeTest.test_create_volume_with_size_zero -tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_negative.VolumesV2NegativeTest.test_create_volume_without_passing_size -tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_negative.VolumesV2NegativeTest.test_delete_invalid_volume_id -tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_negative.VolumesV2NegativeTest.test_delete_volume_without_passing_volume_id -tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_negative.VolumesV2NegativeTest.test_detach_volumes_with_invalid_volume_id -tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_negative.VolumesV2NegativeTest.test_get_invalid_volume_id -tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_negative.VolumesV2NegativeTest.test_get_volume_without_passing_volume_id tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_negative.VolumesV2NegativeTest.test_list_volumes_detail_with_invalid_status tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_negative.VolumesV2NegativeTest.test_list_volumes_detail_with_nonexistent_name tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_negative.VolumesV2NegativeTest.test_list_volumes_with_invalid_status tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_negative.VolumesV2NegativeTest.test_list_volumes_with_nonexistent_name +tempest.api.volume.v2.test_volumes_list.VolumesV2ListTestJSON.test_volume_list_details_pagination +tempest.api.volume.v2.test_volumes_list.VolumesV2ListTestJSON.test_volume_list_details_with_multiple_params +tempest.api.volume.v2.test_volumes_list.VolumesV2ListTestJSON.test_volume_list_pagination + +tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_list.VolumesListTestJSON.test_volume_list +tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_list.VolumesListTestJSON.test_volume_list_by_name +tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_list.VolumesListTestJSON.test_volume_list_details_by_name +tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_list.VolumesListTestJSON.test_volume_list_param_display_name_and_status +tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_list.VolumesListTestJSON.test_volume_list_with_detail_param_display_name_and_status +tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_list.VolumesListTestJSON.test_volume_list_with_detail_param_metadata +tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_list.VolumesListTestJSON.test_volume_list_with_details +tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_list.VolumesListTestJSON.test_volume_list_with_param_metadata +tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_list.VolumesListTestJSON.test_volume_list_by_availability_zone +tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_list.VolumesListTestJSON.test_volume_list_by_status +tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_list.VolumesListTestJSON.test_volume_list_details_by_availability_zone +tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_list.VolumesListTestJSON.test_volume_list_details_by_status +tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_negative.VolumesNegativeTest.test_list_volumes_detail_with_invalid_status +tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_negative.VolumesNegativeTest.test_list_volumes_detail_with_nonexistent_name +tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_negative.VolumesNegativeTest.test_list_volumes_with_invalid_status +tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_negative.VolumesNegativeTest.test_list_volumes_with_nonexistent_name +tempest.api.volume.v2.test_volumes_list.VolumesListTestJSON.test_volume_list_details_pagination +tempest.api.volume.v2.test_volumes_list.VolumesListTestJSON.test_volume_list_details_with_multiple_params +tempest.api.volume.v2.test_volumes_list.VolumesListTestJSON.test_volume_list_pagination + +Note: the latter 19 test cases is the alias of the first 19 ones. +Alias should always be included so that the test run will be tempest version agnostic, +which can be used to test different version of Openstack. + +Test preconditions +------------------ + +* Volume extension API +* The backing file for the volume group that Nova uses has space for at least 3 1G volumes + +Basic test flow execution description and pass/fail criteria +------------------------------------------------------------ + +Test execution +'''''''''''''' + +* Test action 1: List all existent volumes +* **Test assertion 1:** Verify the volume list is complete +* Test action 2: List existent volumes and filter the volume list by volume name +* **Test assertion 2:** Verify the length of filtered volume list is 1 and the retrieved volume is correct +* Test action 3: List existent volumes in detail and filter the volume list by volume name +* **Test assertion 3:** Verify the length of filtered volume list is 1 and the retrieved volume is correct +* Test action 4: List existent volumes and filter the volume list by volume name and status 'available' +* **Test assertion 4:** Verify the name and status parameters of the fetched volume are correct +* Test action 5: List existent volumes in detail and filter the volume list by volume name and status 'available' +* **Test assertion 5:** Verify the name and status parameters of the fetched volume are correct +* Test action 6: List all existent volumes in detail and filter the volume list by volume metadata +* **Test assertion 6:** Verify the metadata parameter of the fetched volume is correct +* Test action 7: List all existent volumes in detail +* **Test assertion 7:** Verify the volume list is complete +* Test action 8: List all existent volumes and filter the volume list by volume metadata +* **Test assertion 8:** Verify the metadata parameter of the fetched volume is correct +* Test action 9: List existent volumes and filter the volume list by availability zone +* **Test assertion 9:** Verify the availability zone parameter of the fetched volume is correct +* Test action 10: List all existent volumes and filter the volume list by volume status 'available' +* **Test assertion 10:** Verify the status parameter of the fetched volume is correct +* Test action 11: List existent volumes in detail and filter the volume list by availability zone +* **Test assertion 11:** Verify the availability zone parameter of the fetched volume is correct +* Test action 12: List all existent volumes in detail and filter the volume list by volume status 'available' +* **Test assertion 12:** Verify the status parameter of the fetched volume is correct +* Test action 13: List all existent volumes in detail and filter the volume list by an invalid volume status 'null' +* **Test assertion 13:** Verify the filtered volume list is empty +* Test action 14: List all existent volumes in detail and filter the volume list by a non-existent volume name +* **Test assertion 14:** Verify the filtered volume list is empty +* Test action 15: List all existent volumes and filter the volume list by an invalid volume status 'null' +* **Test assertion 15:** Verify the filtered volume list is empty +* Test action 16: List all existent volumes and filter the volume list by a non-existent volume name +* **Test assertion 16:** Verify the filtered volume list is empty +* Test action 17: List all existent volumes in detail and paginate the volume list by desired volume IDs +* **Test assertion 17:** Verify only the desired volumes are listed in the filtered volume list +* Test action 18: List all existent volumes in detail and filter the volume list by volume status 'available' and display limit '2' +* Test action 19: Sort the filtered volume list by IDs in ascending order +* **Test assertion 18:** Verify the length of filtered volume list is 2 +* **Test assertion 19:** Verify the status of retrieved volumes is correct +* **Test assertion 20:** Verify the filtered volume list is sorted correctly +* Test action 20: List all existent volumes in detail and filter the volume list by volume status 'available' and display limit '2' +* Test action 21: Sort the filtered volume list by IDs in descending order +* **Test assertion 21:** Verify the length of filtered volume list is 2 +* **Test assertion 22:** Verify the status of retrieved volumes is correct +* **Test assertion 23:** Verify the filtered volume list is sorted correctly +* Test action 22: List all existent volumes and paginate the volume list by desired volume IDs +* **Test assertion 24:** Verify only the desired volumes are listed in the filtered volume list + +Pass / fail criteria +'''''''''''''''''''' + +This test case evaluates the volume API ability of getting a list of volumes and filtering the volume list. +Specifically, the test verifies that: + +* Get a list of volumes (in detail) successful. +* Get a list of volumes (in detail) and filter volumes by name/status/metadata/availability zone successful. +* Volume list pagination functionality is working. +* Get a list of volumes in detail using combined condition successful. + +In order to pass this test, all test assertions listed in the test execution above need to pass. + +Post conditions +--------------- + +N/A + +--------------------------------------------------------------- +Test Case 9 - Volume metadata operations with the Cinder v2 API +--------------------------------------------------------------- + +Test case specification +----------------------- + +tempest.api.volume.test_volume_metadata.VolumesV2MetadataTest.test_create_get_delete_volume_metadata +tempest.api.volume.test_volume_metadata.VolumesV2MetadataTest.test_update_volume_metadata_item + +tempest.api.volume.test_volume_metadata.VolumesMetadataTest.test_crud_volume_metadata +tempest.api.volume.test_volume_metadata.VolumesV2MetadataTest.test_crud_volume_metadata + +tempest.api.volume.test_volume_metadata.VolumesMetadataTest.test_update_volume_metadata_item +tempest.api.volume.test_volume_metadata.VolumesMetadataTest.test_update_show_volume_metadata_item + +Note: Test case 3 and 4 are the alias of the first test case, and the last 2 test cases +are the alias of the second test case. +Alias should always be included so that the test run will be tempest version agnostic, +which can be used to test different version of OpenStack. + +Test preconditions +------------------ + +* Volume extension API + +Basic test flow execution description and pass/fail criteria +------------------------------------------------------------ + +Test execution +'''''''''''''' + +* Test action 1: Create metadata for a provided volume VOL1 +* Test action 2: Get the metadata of VOL1 +* **Test assertion 1:** Verify the metadata of VOL1 is correct +* Test action 3: Update the metadata of VOL1 +* **Test assertion 2:** Verify the metadata of VOL1 is updated +* Test action 4: Delete one metadata item 'key1' of VOL1 +* **Test assertion 3:** Verify the metadata item 'key1' is deleted +* Test action 5: Create metadata for a provided volume VOL2 +* **Test assertion 4:** Verify the metadata of VOL2 is correct +* Test action 6: Update one metadata item 'key3' of VOL2 +* **Test assertion 5:** Verify the metadata of VOL2 is updated + +Pass / fail criteria +'''''''''''''''''''' + +This test case evaluates the volume API ability of creating metadata for a volume, getting the +metadata of a volume, updating volume metadata and deleting a metadata item of a volume. +Specifically, the test verifies that: + +* Create metadata for volume successfully. +* Get metadata of volume successfully. +* Update volume metadata and metadata item successfully. +* Delete metadata item of a volume successfully. + +In order to pass this test, all test assertions listed in the test execution above need to pass. + +Post conditions +--------------- + +N/A + +--------------------------------------------------------------------------------- +Test Case 10 - Verification of read-only status on volumes with the Cinder v2 API +--------------------------------------------------------------------------------- + +Test case specification +----------------------- + +tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_actions.VolumesV2ActionsTest.test_volume_readonly_update + +tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_actions.VolumesActionsTest.test_volume_readonly_update + +Note: the second test case is the alias of the first one. +Alias should always be included so that the test run will be tempest version agnostic, +which can be used to test different version of Openstack. + +Test preconditions +------------------ + +* Volume extension API + +Basic test flow execution description and pass/fail criteria +------------------------------------------------------------ + +Test execution +'''''''''''''' + +* Test action 1: Update a provided volume VOL1's read-only access mode to 'True' +* **Test assertion 1:** Verify VOL1 is in read-only access mode +* Test action 2: Update a provided volume VOL1's read-only access mode to 'False' +* **Test assertion 2:** Verify VOL1 is not in read-only access mode + +Pass / fail criteria +'''''''''''''''''''' + +This test case evaluates the volume API ability of setting and updating volume read-only access mode. +Specifically, the test verifies that: + +* Volume read-only access mode can be set and updated. + +In order to pass this test, all test assertions listed in the test execution above need to pass. + +Post conditions +--------------- + +N/A + +------------------------------------------------------------------- +Test Case 11 - Volume reservation operations with the Cinder v2 API +------------------------------------------------------------------- + +Test case specification +----------------------- + +tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_actions.VolumesV2ActionsTest.test_reserve_unreserve_volume tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_negative.VolumesV2NegativeTest.test_reserve_volume_with_negative_volume_status tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_negative.VolumesV2NegativeTest.test_reserve_volume_with_nonexistent_volume_id tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_negative.VolumesV2NegativeTest.test_unreserve_volume_with_nonexistent_volume_id -tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_negative.VolumesV2NegativeTest.test_update_volume_with_empty_volume_id -tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_negative.VolumesV2NegativeTest.test_update_volume_with_invalid_volume_id -tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_negative.VolumesV2NegativeTest.test_update_volume_with_nonexistent_volume_id + +tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_actions.VolumesActionsTest.test_reserve_unreserve_volume +tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_negative.VolumesNegativeTest.test_reserve_volume_with_negative_volume_status +tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_negative.VolumesNegativeTest.test_reserve_volume_with_nonexistent_volume_id +tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_negative.VolumesNegativeTest.test_unreserve_volume_with_nonexistent_volume_id + +Note: the last 4 test cases are the alias of the first 4 ones. +Alias should always be included so that the test run will be tempest version agnostic, +which can be used to test different version of Openstack. + +Test preconditions +------------------ + +* Volume extension API + +Basic test flow execution description and pass/fail criteria +------------------------------------------------------------ + +Test execution +'''''''''''''' + +* Test action 1: Update a provided volume VOL1 as reserved +* **Test assertion 1:** Verify VOL1 is in 'attaching' status +* Test action 2: Update VOL1 as un-reserved +* **Test assertion 2:** Verify VOL1 is in 'available' status +* Test action 3: Update a provided volume VOL2 as reserved +* Test action 4: Update VOL2 as reserved again +* **Test assertion 3:** Verify update VOL2 status failed, a bad request error is returned in the response +* Test action 5: Update VOL2 as un-reserved +* Test action 6: Update a non-existent volume as reserved by using an invalid volume ID +* **Test assertion 4:** Verify update non-existent volume as reserved failed, a 'Not Found' error is returned in the response +* Test action 7: Update a non-existent volume as un-reserved by using an invalid volume ID +* **Test assertion 5:** Verify update non-existent volume as un-reserved failed, a 'Not Found' error is returned in the response + +Pass / fail criteria +'''''''''''''''''''' + +This test case evaluates the volume API ability of reserving and un-reserving volumes. +Specifically, the test verifies that: + +* Volume can be reserved and un-reserved. +* Update a non-existent volume as reserved is not allowed. +* Update a non-existent volume as un-reserved is not allowed. + +In order to pass this test, all test assertions listed in the test execution above need to pass. + +Post conditions +--------------- + +N/A + +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- +Test Case 12 - Volume snapshot creation/deletion operations with the Cinder v2 API +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- + +Test case specification +----------------------- + +tempest.api.volume.test_snapshot_metadata.SnapshotV2MetadataTestJSON.test_create_get_delete_snapshot_metadata +tempest.api.volume.test_snapshot_metadata.SnapshotV2MetadataTestJSON.test_update_snapshot_metadata_item +tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_negative.VolumesV2NegativeTest.test_create_volume_with_nonexistent_snapshot_id +tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_negative.VolumesV2NegativeTest.test_delete_invalid_volume_id +tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_negative.VolumesV2NegativeTest.test_delete_volume_without_passing_volume_id tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_negative.VolumesV2NegativeTest.test_volume_delete_nonexistent_volume_id -tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_negative.VolumesV2NegativeTest.test_volume_get_nonexistent_volume_id tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_snapshots.VolumesV2SnapshotTestJSON.test_snapshot_create_get_list_update_delete +tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_snapshots.VolumesV2SnapshotTestJSON.test_volume_from_snapshot tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_snapshots.VolumesV2SnapshotTestJSON.test_snapshots_list_details_with_params tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_snapshots.VolumesV2SnapshotTestJSON.test_snapshots_list_with_params -tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_snapshots.VolumesV2SnapshotTestJSON.test_volume_from_snapshot -tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_snapshots_list.VolumesV2SnapshotListTestJSON.test_snapshots_list_details_with_params -tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_snapshots_list.VolumesV2SnapshotListTestJSON.test_snapshots_list_with_params tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_snapshots_negative.VolumesV2SnapshotNegativeTestJSON.test_create_snapshot_with_nonexistent_volume_id tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_snapshots_negative.VolumesV2SnapshotNegativeTestJSON.test_create_snapshot_without_passing_volume_id -tempest.api.volume.v2.test_volumes_list.VolumesV2ListTestJSON.test_volume_list_details_pagination -tempest.api.volume.v2.test_volumes_list.VolumesV2ListTestJSON.test_volume_list_details_with_multiple_params -tempest.api.volume.v2.test_volumes_list.VolumesV2ListTestJSON.test_volume_list_pagination + +tempest.api.volume.test_snapshot_metadata.SnapshotMetadataTestJSON.test_crud_snapshot_metadata +tempest.api.volume.test_snapshot_metadata.SnapshotV2MetadataTestJSON.test_crud_snapshot_metadata + +tempest.api.volume.test_snapshot_metadata.SnapshotMetadataTestJSON.test_update_snapshot_metadata_item +tempest.api.volume.test_snapshot_metadata.SnapshotMetadataTestJSON.test_update_show_snapshot_metadata_item + +tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_negative.VolumesNegativeTest.test_create_volume_with_nonexistent_snapshot_id +tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_negative.VolumesNegativeTest.test_delete_invalid_volume_id +tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_negative.VolumesNegativeTest.test_delete_volume_without_passing_volume_id +tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_negative.VolumesNegativeTest.test_volume_delete_nonexistent_volume_id +tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_snapshots.VolumesSnapshotTestJSON.test_snapshot_create_get_list_update_delete +tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_snapshots.VolumesSnapshotTestJSON.test_volume_from_snapshot + +tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_snapshots_list.VolumesSnapshotListTestJSON.test_snapshots_list_details_with_params +tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_snapshots_list.VolumesV2SnapshotListTestJSON.test_snapshots_list_details_with_params + +tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_snapshots_list.VolumesSnapshotListTestJSON.test_snapshots_list_with_params +tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_snapshots_list.VolumesV2SnapshotListTestJSON.test_snapshots_list_with_params + +tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_snapshots_negative.VolumesSnapshotNegativeTestJSON.test_create_snapshot_with_nonexistent_volume_id +tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_snapshots_negative.VolumesSnapshotNegativeTestJSON.test_create_snapshot_without_passing_volume_id + +Note: test case 13 and 14 are the alias of test case 1, test case 15 and 16 are the alias of test case 2, +test case 17 to 22 are the alias of test case 3 to 8 respectively, test case 23 and 24 are the alias of +test case 9, test case 25 and 26 are the alias of test case 10, and test case 27 and 28 are the alias of +test case 11 and 12 respectively. +Alias should always be included so that the test run will be tempest version agnostic, +which can be used to test different version of OpenStack. + +Test preconditions +------------------ + +* Volume extension API + +Basic test flow execution description and pass/fail criteria +------------------------------------------------------------ + +Test execution +'''''''''''''' + +* Test action 1: Create metadata for a provided snapshot SNAP1 +* Test action 2: Get the metadata of SNAP1 +* **Test assertion 1:** Verify the metadata of SNAP1 is correct +* Test action 3: Update the metadata of SNAP1 +* **Test assertion 2:** Verify the metadata of SNAP1 is updated +* Test action 4: Delete one metadata item 'key3' of SNAP1 +* **Test assertion 3:** Verify the metadata item 'key3' is deleted +* Test action 5: Create metadata for a provided snapshot SNAP2 +* **Test assertion 4:** Verify the metadata of SNAP2 is correct +* Test action 6: Update one metadata item 'key3' of SNAP2 +* **Test assertion 5:** Verify the metadata of SNAP2 is updated +* Test action 7: Create a volume with a nonexistent snapshot +* **Test assertion 6:** Verify create volume failed, a 'Not Found' error is returned in the response +* Test action 8: Delete a volume with an invalid volume ID +* **Test assertion 7:** Verify delete volume failed, a 'Not Found' error is returned in the response +* Test action 9: Delete a volume with an empty volume ID +* **Test assertion 8:** Verify delete volume failed, a 'Not Found' error is returned in the response +* Test action 10: Delete a volume with a nonexistent volume ID +* **Test assertion 9:** Verify delete volume failed, a 'Not Found' error is returned in the response +* Test action 11: Create a snapshot SNAP2 from a provided volume VOL1 +* Test action 12: Retrieve SNAP2's detail information +* **Test assertion 10:** Verify SNAP2 is created from VOL1 +* Test action 13: Update the name and description of SNAP2 +* **Test assertion 11:** Verify the name and description of SNAP2 are updated in the response body of update snapshot API +* Test action 14: Retrieve SNAP2's detail information +* **Test assertion 12:** Verify the name and description of SNAP2 are correct +* Test action 15: Delete SNAP2 +* Test action 16: Create a volume VOL2 with a volume size +* Test action 17: Create a snapshot SNAP3 from VOL2 +* Test action 18: Create a volume VOL3 from SNAP3 with a bigger volume size +* Test action 19: Retrieve VOL3's detail information +* **Test assertion 13:** Verify volume size and source snapshot of VOL3 are correct +* Test action 20: List all snapshots in detail and filter the snapshot list by name +* **Test assertion 14:** Verify the filtered snapshot list is correct +* Test action 21: List all snapshots in detail and filter the snapshot list by status +* **Test assertion 15:** Verify the filtered snapshot list is correct +* Test action 22: List all snapshots in detail and filter the snapshot list by name and status +* **Test assertion 16:** Verify the filtered snapshot list is correct +* Test action 23: List all snapshots and filter the snapshot list by name +* **Test assertion 17:** Verify the filtered snapshot list is correct +* Test action 24: List all snapshots and filter the snapshot list by status +* **Test assertion 18:** Verify the filtered snapshot list is correct +* Test action 25: List all snapshots and filter the snapshot list by name and status +* **Test assertion 19:** Verify the filtered snapshot list is correct +* Test action 26: Create a snapshot from a nonexistent volume by using an invalid volume ID +* **Test assertion 20:** Verify create snapshot failed, a 'Not Found' error is returned in the response +* Test action 27: Create a snapshot from a volume by using an empty volume ID +* **Test assertion 21:** Verify create snapshot failed, a 'Not Found' error is returned in the response + +Pass / fail criteria +'''''''''''''''''''' + +This test case evaluates the volume API ability of managing snapshot and snapshot metadata. +Specifically, the test verifies that: + +* Create metadata for snapshot successfully. +* Get metadata of snapshot successfully. +* Update snapshot metadata and metadata item successfully. +* Delete metadata item of a snapshot successfully. +* Create a volume from a nonexistent snapshot is not allowed. +* Delete a volume using an invalid volume ID is not allowed. +* Delete a volume without passing the volume ID is not allowed. +* Delete a non-existent volume is not allowed. +* Create snapshot successfully. +* Get snapshot's detail information successfully. +* Update snapshot attributes successfully. +* Delete snapshot successfully. +* Creates a volume and a snapshot passing a size different from the source successfully. +* List snapshot details by display_name and status filters successfully. +* Create a snapshot from a nonexistent volume is not allowed. +* Create a snapshot from a volume without passing the volume ID is not allowed. + +In order to pass this test, all test assertions listed in the test execution above need to pass. + +Post conditions +--------------- + +N/A + +-------------------------------------------------------------- +Test Case 13 - Volume update operations with the Cinder v2 API +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +Test case specification +----------------------- + +tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_negative.VolumesV2NegativeTest.test_update_volume_with_empty_volume_id +tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_negative.VolumesV2NegativeTest.test_update_volume_with_invalid_volume_id +tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_negative.VolumesV2NegativeTest.test_update_volume_with_nonexistent_volume_id + +tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_negative.VolumesNegativeTest.test_update_volume_with_empty_volume_id +tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_negative.VolumesNegativeTest.test_update_volume_with_invalid_volume_id +tempest.api.volume.test_volumes_negative.VolumesNegativeTest.test_update_volume_with_nonexistent_volume_id + +Note: the last 3 test cases are the alias of the first 3 ones. +Alias should always be included so that the test run will be tempest version agnostic, +which can be used to test different version of Openstack. + +Test preconditions +------------------ + +* Volume extension API + +Basic test flow execution description and pass/fail criteria +------------------------------------------------------------ + +Test execution +'''''''''''''' + +* Test action 1: Update a volume by using an empty volume ID +* **Test assertion 1:** Verify update volume failed, a 'Not Found' error is returned in the response +* Test action 2: Update a volume by using an invalid volume ID +* **Test assertion 2:** Verify update volume failed, a 'Not Found' error is returned in the response +* Test action 3: Update a non-existent volume by using a random generated volume ID +* **Test assertion 3:** Verify update volume failed, a 'Not Found' error is returned in the response + +Pass / fail criteria +'''''''''''''''''''' + +This test case evaluates the volume API ability of updating volume attributes. +Specifically, the test verifies that: + +* Update a volume without passing the volume ID is not allowed. +* Update a volume using an invalid volume ID is not allowed. +* Update a non-existent volume is not allowed. + +In order to pass this test, all test assertions listed in the test execution above need to pass. + +Post conditions +--------------- + +N/A diff --git a/docs/testing/user/testspecification/vping/index.rst b/docs/testing/user/testspecification/vping/index.rst new file mode 100644 index 00000000..d7a207c0 --- /dev/null +++ b/docs/testing/user/testspecification/vping/index.rst @@ -0,0 +1,279 @@ +.. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. +.. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 +.. (c) Ericsson AB + +======================== +Vping test specification +======================== + +.. toctree:: + :maxdepth: 2 + +Scope +===== + +The vping test area evaluates basic NFVi capabilities of the system under test. +These capabilities include creating a small number of virtual machines, +establishing basic L3 connectivity between them and verifying connectivity by +means of ICMP packets. + + +References +========== + +- Neutron Client + + - https://docs.openstack.org/developer/python-neutronclient/usage/library.html + +- Nova Client + + - https://docs.openstack.org/developer/python-novaclient/ref/v2/servers.html + +- SSHClient + + - http://docs.paramiko.org/en/2.2/ + +- SCPClient + + - https://pypi.python.org/pypi/scp + + +Definitions and abbreviations +============================= + +The following terms and abbreviations are used in conjunction with this test +area + +- ICMP - Internet Control Message Protocol +- L3 - Layer 3 +- NFVi - Network functions virtualization infrastructure +- SCP - Secure Copy +- SSH - Secure Shell +- VM - Virtual machine + + +System Under Test (SUT) +======================= + +The system under test is assumed to be the NFVi and VIM in operation on a +Pharos compliant infrastructure. + + +Test Area Structure +=================== + +The test area is structured in two separate tests which are executed +sequentially. The order of the tests is arbitrary as there are no dependencies +across the tests. + + +Test Descriptions +================= + +-------------------------------------------------------------------- +Test Case 1 - vPing using userdata provided by nova metadata service +-------------------------------------------------------------------- + +Short name +---------- + +opnfv.vping.userdata + + +Use case specification +---------------------- + +This test evaluates the use case where an NFVi tenant boots up two VMs and +requires L3 connectivity between those VMs. The target IP is passed to the VM +that will initiate pings by using a custom userdata script provided by nova metadata service. + + +Test preconditions +------------------ + +At least one compute node is available. No further pre-configuration needed. + + +Basic test flow execution description and pass/fail criteria +------------------------------------------------------------ + +Methodology for verifying connectivity +'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' + +Connectivity between VMs is tested by sending ICMP ping packets between +selected VMs. The target IP is passed to the VM sending pings by using a +custom userdata script by means of the config driver mechanism provided by +Nova metadata service. Whether or not a ping was successful is determined by +checking the console output of the source VMs. + + +Test execution +'''''''''''''' + +* Test action 1: + * Create a private tenant network by using neutron client + * Create one subnet and one router in the network by neutron client + * Add one interface between the subnet and router + * Add one gateway route to the router by neutron client + * Store the network id in the response +* **Test assertion 1:** The network id, subnet id and router id can be found in the response +* Test action 2: + * Create an security group by using neutron client + * Store the security group id parameter in the response +* **Test assertion 2:** The security group id can be found in the response +* Test action 3: boot VM1 by using nova client with configured name, image, flavor, private tenant + network created in test action 1, security group created in test action 2 +* **Test assertion 3:** The VM1 object can be found in the response +* Test action 4: Generate ping script with the IP of VM1 to be passed as userdata provided by + the **nova metadata service**. +* Test action 5: Boot VM2 by using nova client with configured name, image, flavor, private tenant + network created in test action 1, security group created in test action 2, userdata created + in test action 4 +* **Test assertion 4:** The VM2 object can be found in the response +* Test action 6: Inside VM2, the ping script is executed automatically when booted and it contains a + loop doing the ping until the return code is 0 or timeout reached. For each ping, when the return + code is 0, "vPing OK" is printed in the VM2 console-log, otherwise, "vPing KO" is printed. + Monitoring the console-log of VM2 to see the response generated by the script. +* **Test assertion 5:** "vPing OK" is detected, when monitoring the console-log in VM2 +* Test action 7: delete VM1, VM2 +* **Test assertion 6:** VM1 and VM2 are not present in the VM list +* Test action 8: delete security group, gateway, interface, router, subnet and network +* **Test assertion 7:** The security group, gateway, interface, router, subnet and network are + no longer present in the lists after deleting + + +Pass / fail criteria +'''''''''''''''''''' + +This test evaluates basic NFVi capabilities of the system under test. +Specifically, the test verifies that: + +* Neutron client network, subnet, router, interface create commands return valid "id" parameters + which are shown in the create response message +* Neutron client interface add command to add between subnet and router returns success code +* Neutron client gateway add command to add to router returns success code +* Neutron client security group create command returns valid "id" parameter which is shown in + the response message +* Nova client VM create command returns valid VM attributes response message +* Nova metadata server can transfer userdata configuration at nova client VM booting time +* Ping command from one VM to the other in same private tenant network returns valid code +* All items created using neutron client or nova client create commands are able to be removed by + using the returned identifiers + +In order to pass this test, all test assertions listed in the test execution +above need to pass. + + +Post conditions +--------------- + +None + + +---------------------------------------------- +Test Case 2 - vPing using SSH to a floating IP +---------------------------------------------- + +Short name +---------- + +opnfv.vping.ssh + + +Use case specification +---------------------- + +This test evaluates the use case where an NFVi tenant boots up two VMs and requires +L3 connectivity between those VMs. An SSH connection is establised from the host to +a floating IP associated with VM2 and ``ping`` is executed on VM2 with the IP of VM1 as target. + + +Test preconditions +------------------ + +At least one compute node is available. There should exist an OpenStack external network +and can assign floating IP. + + +Basic test flow execution description and pass/fail criteria +------------------------------------------------------------ + +Methodology for verifying connectivity +'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' + +Connectivity between VMs is tested by sending ICMP ping packets between +selected VMs. To this end, the test establishes an SSH connection from the host +running the test suite to a floating IP associated with VM2 and executes ``ping`` +on VM2 with the IP of VM1 as target. + + +Test execution +'''''''''''''' + + +* Test action 1: + * Create a private tenant network by neutron client + * Create one subnet and one router are created in the network by using neutron client + * Create one interface between the subnet and router + * Add one gateway route to the router by neutron client + * Store the network id in the response +* **Test assertion 1:** The network id, subnet id and router id can be found in the response +* Test action 2: + * Create an security group by using neutron client + * Store the security group id parameter in the response +* **Test assertion 2:** The security group id can be found in the response +* Test action 3: Boot VM1 by using nova client with configured name, image, flavor, private tenant + network created in test action 1, security group created in test action 2 +* **Test assertion 3:** The VM1 object can be found in the response +* Test action 4: Boot VM2 by using nova client with configured name, image, flavor, private tenant + network created in test action 1, security group created in test action 2 +* **Test assertion 4:** The VM2 object can be found in the response +* Test action 5: create one floating IP by using neutron client, storing the floating IP address + returned in the response +* **Test assertion 5:** Floating IP address can be found in the response +* Test action 6: Assign the floating IP address created in test action 5 to VM2 by using nova client +* **Test assertion 6:** The assigned floating IP can be found in the VM2 console log file +* Test action 7: Establish SSH connection between the test host and VM2 through the floating IP +* **Test assertion 7:** SSH connection between the test host and VM2 is established within + 300 seconds +* Test action 8: Copy the Ping script from the test host to VM2 by using SCPClient +* **Test assertion 8:** The Ping script can be found inside VM2 +* Test action 9: Inside VM2, to execute the Ping script to ping VM1, the Ping script contains a + loop doing the ping until the return code is 0 or timeout reached, for each ping, when the return + code is 0, "vPing OK" is printed in the VM2 console-log, otherwise, "vPing KO" is printed. + Monitoring the console-log of VM2 to see the response generated by the script. +* **Test assertion 9:** "vPing OK" is detected, when monitoring the console-log in VM2 +* Test action 10: delete VM1, VM2 +* **Test assertion 10:** VM1 and VM2 are not present in the VM list +* Test action 11: delete floating IP, security group, gateway, interface, router, subnet and network +* **Test assertion 11:** The security group, gateway, interface, router, subnet and network are + no longer present in the lists after deleting + +Pass / fail criteria +'''''''''''''''''''' + +This test evaluates basic NFVi capabilities of the system under test. +Specifically, the test verifies that: + +* Neutron client network, subnet, router, interface create commands return valid "id" parameters + which are shown in the create response message +* Neutron client interface add command to add between subnet and router return success code +* Neutron client gateway add command to add to router return success code +* Neutron client security group create command returns valid "id" parameter which is shown in the + response message +* Nova client VM create command returns valid VM attributes response message +* Neutron client floating IP create command return valid floating IP address +* Nova client add floating IP command returns valid response message +* SSH connection can be established using a floating IP +* Ping command from one VM to another in same private tenant network returns valid code +* All items created using neutron client or nova client create commands are able to be removed by + using the returned identifiers + +In order to pass this test, all test assertions listed in the test execution +above need to pass. + + +Post conditions +--------------- + +None diff --git a/docs/testing/user/testspecification/vpn/index.rst b/docs/testing/user/testspecification/vpn/index.rst index 1b5fe439..0a8a8d17 100644 --- a/docs/testing/user/testspecification/vpn/index.rst +++ b/docs/testing/user/testspecification/vpn/index.rst @@ -12,14 +12,17 @@ VPN test specification Scope ===== -The VPN test area evaluates the ability of the system under test to support VPN networking -for virtual workdloads. The tests in this suite will evaluate establishing VPN networks, -publishing and communication between endpoints using BGP and tear down of the networks. +The VPN test area evaluates the ability of the system under test to support VPN +networking for virtual workloads. The tests in this test area will evaluate +establishing VPN networks, publishing and communication between endpoints using +BGP and tear down of the networks. References -================ +========== -This test suite assumes support for the following specifications: +This test area evaluates the ability of the system to perform selected actions +defined in the following specifications. Details of specific features evaluated +are described in the test descriptions. - RFC 4364 - BGP/MPLS IP Virtual Private Networks @@ -33,10 +36,12 @@ This test suite assumes support for the following specifications: - https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2547 + Definitions and abbreviations ============================= -The following terms and abreviations are used in conunction with this test suite +The following terms and abbreviations are used in conjunction with this test +area - BGP - Border gateway protocol - eRT - Export route target @@ -48,15 +53,27 @@ The following terms and abreviations are used in conunction with this test suite - VPN - Virtual private network - VLAN - Virtual local area network + System Under Test (SUT) ======================= -The system under test is assumed to be the NFVi in operation on an Pharos compliant infrastructure. +The system under test is assumed to be the NFVi and VIM in operation on a +Pharos compliant infrastructure. + -Test Suite Structure -==================== +Test Area Structure +=================== + +The test area is structured in four separate tests which are executed +sequentially. The order of the tests is arbitrary as there are no dependencies +across the tests. Specifially, every test performs clean-up operations which +return the system to the same state as before the test. + +The test area evaluates the ability of the SUT to establish connectivity +between Virtual Machines using an appropriate route target configuration, +reconfigure the route targets to remove connectivity between the VMs, then +reestablish connectivity by re-association. -The test suite is structured in some way that I am unable to articulate at this time. Test Descriptions ================= @@ -65,43 +82,451 @@ Test Descriptions Test Case 1 - VPN provides connectivity between Neutron subnets ---------------------------------------------------------------- +Short name +---------- + +opnfv.sdnvpn.subnet_connectivity + + Use case specification ---------------------- -This test evaluate the instance where an NFVi tenant wants to use a BGPVPN to provide -connectivity between VMs on different Neutron networks and Subnets that reside on different hosts. +This test evaluates the use case where an NFVi tenant uses a BGPVPN to provide +connectivity between VMs on different Neutron networks and subnets that reside +on different hosts. + Test preconditions ------------------ -2 compute nodes are available, denoted Node1 and Node 2 in the following. +2 compute nodes are available, denoted Node1 and Node2 in the following. + Basic test flow execution description and pass/fail criteria ------------------------------------------------------------ -Set up VM1 and VM2 on Node1 and VM3 on Node2, all having ports in the same Neutron Network N1 -and all having 10.10.10/24 addresses (this subnet is denoted SN1 in the following). +Methodology for verifying connectivity +'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' + +Connectivity between VMs is tested by sending ICMP ping packets between +selected VMs. The target IPs are passed to the VMs sending pings by means of a +custom user data script. Whether or not a ping was successful is determined by +checking the console output of the source VMs. + + +Test execution +'''''''''''''' + +* Create Neutron network N1 and subnet SN1 with IP range 10.10.10.0/24 +* Create Neutron network N2 and subnet SN2 with IP range 10.10.11.0/24 + +* Create VM1 on Node1 with a port in network N1 +* Create VM2 on Node1 with a port in network N1 +* Create VM3 on Node2 with a port in network N1 +* Create VM4 on Node1 with a port in network N2 +* Create VM5 on Node2 with a port in network N2 + +* Create VPN1 with eRT<>iRT +* Create network association between network N1 and VPN1 + +* VM1 sends ICMP packets to VM2 using ``ping`` + +* **Test assertion 1:** Ping from VM1 to VM2 succeeds: ``ping`` exits with return code 0 + +* VM1 sends ICMP packets to VM3 using ``ping`` + +* **Test assertion 2:** Ping from VM1 to VM3 succeeds: ``ping`` exits with return code 0 + +* VM1 sends ICMP packets to VM4 using ``ping`` + +* **Test assertion 3:** Ping from VM1 to VM4 fails: ``ping`` exits with a non-zero return code + +* Create network association between network N2 and VPN1 + +* VM4 sends ICMP packets to VM5 using ``ping`` -Set up VM4 on Node1 and VM5 on Node2, both having ports in Neutron Network N2 -and having 10.10.11/24 addresses (this subnet is denoted SN2 in the following). +* **Test assertion 4:** Ping from VM4 to VM5 succeeds: ``ping`` exits with return code 0 -* Create VPN1 with eRT<>iRT and associate SN1 to it -* Test action 1: SSH into VM1 and ping VM2, test passes if ping works -* Test action 2: SSH into VM1 and ping VM3, test passes is ping works -* Test action 3: SSH into VM1 and ping VM4, test passes if ping does not work -* Associate SN2 to VPN1 -* Test action 4: Ping from VM4 to VM5 should work -* Test action 5: Ping from VM1 to VM4 should not work -* Test action 6: Ping from VM1 to VM5 should not work * Configure iRT=eRT in VPN1 -* Test action 7: Ping from VM1 to VM4 should work -* Test action 8: Ping from VM1 to VM5 should work -The pass criteria for this test case is that all instructions are able to be carried out -according to the described behaviour without deviation. -A negative result will be generated if the above is not met in completion. +* VM1 sends ICMP packets to VM4 using ``ping`` + +* **Test assertion 5:** Ping from VM1 to VM4 succeeds: ``ping`` exits with return code 0 + +* VM1 sends ICMP packets to VM5 using ``ping`` + +* **Test assertion 6:** Ping from VM1 to VM5 succeeds: ``ping`` exits with return code 0 + +* Delete all instances: VM1, VM2, VM3, VM4 and VM5 + +* Delete all networks and subnets: networks N1 and N2 including subnets SN1 and SN2 + +* Delete all network associations and VPN1 + + +Pass / fail criteria +'''''''''''''''''''' + +This test evaluates the capability of the NFVi and VIM to provide routed IP +connectivity between VMs by means of BGP/MPLS VPNs. Specifically, the test +verifies that: + +* VMs in the same Neutron subnet have IP connectivity regardless of BGP/MPLS + VPNs (test assertion 1, 2, 4) + +* VMs in different Neutron subnets do not have IP connectivity by default - in + this case without associating VPNs with the same import and export route + targets to the Neutron networks (test assertion 3) + +* VMs in different Neutron subnets have routed IP connectivity after + associating both networks with BGP/MPLS VPNs which have been configured with + the same import and export route targets (test assertion 5, 6). Hence, + adjusting the ingress and egress route targets enables as well as prohibits + routing. + +In order to pass this test, all test assertions listed in the test execution +above need to pass. + + +Post conditions +--------------- + +N/A + +------------------------------------------------------------ +Test Case 2 - VPNs ensure traffic separation between tenants +------------------------------------------------------------ + +Short Name +---------- + +opnfv.sdnvpn.tenant_separation + + +Use case specification +---------------------- + +This test evaluates if VPNs provide separation of traffic such that overlapping +IP ranges can be used. + + +Test preconditions +------------------ + +2 compute nodes are available, denoted Node1 and Node2 in the following. + + +Basic test flow execution description and pass/fail criteria +------------------------------------------------------------ + +Methodology for verifying connectivity +'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' + +Connectivity between VMs is tested by establishing an SSH connection. Moreover, +the command "hostname" is executed at the remote VM in order to retrieve the +hostname of the remote VM. The retrieved hostname is furthermore compared +against an expected value. This is used to verify tenant traffic separation, +i.e., despite overlapping IPs, a connection is made to the correct VM as +determined by means of the hostname of the target VM. + + + +Test execution +'''''''''''''' + +* Create Neutron network N1 +* Create subnet SN1a of network N1 with IP range 10.10.10.0/24 +* Create subnet SN1b of network N1 with IP range 10.10.11.0/24 + +* Create Neutron network N2 +* Create subnet SN2a of network N2 with IP range 10.10.10.0/24 +* Create subnet SN2b of network N2 with IP range 10.10.11.0/24 + +* Create VM1 on Node1 with a port in network N1 and IP 10.10.10.11. +* Create VM2 on Node1 with a port in network N1 and IP 10.10.10.12. +* Create VM3 on Node2 with a port in network N1 and IP 10.10.11.13. +* Create VM4 on Node1 with a port in network N2 and IP 10.10.10.12. +* Create VM5 on Node2 with a port in network N2 and IP 10.10.11.13. + +* Create VPN1 with iRT=eRT=RT1 +* Create network association between network N1 and VPN1 + +* VM1 attempts to execute the command ``hostname`` on the VM with IP 10.10.10.12 via SSH. + +* **Test assertion 1:** VM1 can successfully connect to the VM with IP + 10.10.10.12. via SSH and execute the remote command ``hostname``. The + retrieved hostname equals the hostname of VM2. + +* VM1 attempts to execute the command ``hostname`` on the VM with IP 10.10.11.13 via SSH. + +* **Test assertion 2:** VM1 can successfully connect to the VM with IP + 10.10.11.13 via SSH and execute the remote command ``hostname``. The + retrieved hostname equals the hostname of VM3. + +* Create VPN2 with iRT=eRT=RT2 +* Create network association between network N2 and VPN2 + +* VM4 attempts to execute the command ``hostname`` on the VM with IP 10.10.11.13 via SSH. + +* **Test assertion 3:** VM4 can successfully connect to the VM with IP + 10.10.11.13 via SSH and execute the remote command ``hostname``. The + retrieved hostname equals the hostname of VM5. + +* VM4 attempts to execute the command ``hostname`` on the VM with IP 10.10.11.11 via SSH. + +* **Test assertion 4:** VM4 cannot connect to the VM with IP 10.10.11.11 via SSH. + +* Delete all instances: VM1, VM2, VM3, VM4 and VM5 + +* Delete all networks and subnets: networks N1 and N2 including subnets SN1a, SN1b, SN2a and SN2b + +* Delete all network associations, VPN1 and VPN2 + + +Pass / fail criteria +'''''''''''''''''''' + +This test evaluates the capability of the NFVi and VIM to provide routed IP +connectivity between VMs by means of BGP/MPLS VPNs. Specifically, the test +verifies that: + +* VMs in the same Neutron subnet (still) have IP connectivity between each + other when a BGP/MPLS VPN is associated with the network (test assertion 1). + +* VMs in different Neutron subnets have routed IP connectivity between each + other when BGP/MPLS VPNs with the same import and expert route targets are + associated with both networks (assertion 2). + +* VMs in different Neutron networks and BGP/MPLS VPNs with different import and + export route targets can have overlapping IP ranges. The BGP/MPLS VPNs + provide traffic separation (assertion 3 and 4). + +In order to pass this test, all test assertions listed in the test execution +above need to pass. + + +Post conditions +--------------- + +N/A + +-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- +Test Case 3 - VPN provides connectivity between subnets using router association +-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- + +Short Name +---------- + +opnfv.sdnvpn.router_association + + +Use case specification +---------------------- + +This test evaluates if a VPN provides connectivity between two subnets by +utilizing two different VPN association mechanisms: a router association and a +network association. + +Specifically, the test network topology comprises two networks N1 and N2 with +corresponding subnets. Additionally, network N1 is connected to a router R1. +This test verifies that a VPN V1 provides connectivity between both networks +when applying a router association to router R1 and a network association to +network N2. + + +Test preconditions +------------------ + +2 compute nodes are available, denoted Node1 and Node2 in the following. + +Basic test flow execution description and pass/fail criteria +------------------------------------------------------------ + +Methodology for verifying connectivity +'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' + +Connectivity between VMs is tested by sending ICMP ping packets between +selected VMs. The target IPs are passed to the VMs sending pings by means of a +custom user data script. Whether or not a ping was successful is determined by +checking the console output of the source VMs. + + +Test execution +'''''''''''''' + +* Create a network N1, a subnet SN1 with IP range 10.10.10.0/24 and a connected router R1 +* Create a network N2, a subnet SN2 with IP range 10.10.11.0/24 + +* Create VM1 on Node1 with a port in network N1 +* Create VM2 on Node1 with a port in network N1 +* Create VM3 on Node2 with a port in network N1 +* Create VM4 on Node1 with a port in network N2 +* Create VM5 on Node2 with a port in network N2 + +* Create VPN1 with eRT<>iRT so that connected subnets should not reach each other + +* Create route association between router R1 and VPN1 + +* VM1 sends ICMP packets to VM2 using ``ping`` + +* **Test assertion 1:** Ping from VM1 to VM2 succeeds: ``ping`` exits with return code 0 + +* VM1 sends ICMP packets to VM3 using ``ping`` + +* **Test assertion 2:** Ping from VM1 to VM3 succeeds: ``ping`` exits with return code 0 + +* VM1 sends ICMP packets to VM4 using ``ping`` + +* **Test assertion 3:** Ping from VM1 to VM4 fails: ``ping`` exits with a non-zero return code + +* Create network association between network N2 and VPN1 + +* VM4 sends ICMP packets to VM5 using ``ping`` + +* **Test assertion 4:** Ping from VM4 to VM5 succeeds: ``ping`` exits with return code 0 + +* Change VPN1 so that iRT=eRT + +* VM1 sends ICMP packets to VM4 using ``ping`` + +* **Test assertion 5:** Ping from VM1 to VM4 succeeds: ``ping`` exits with return code 0 + +* VM1 sends ICMP packets to VM5 using ``ping`` + +* **Test assertion 6:** Ping from VM1 to VM5 succeeds: ``ping`` exits with return code 0 + +* Delete all instances: VM1, VM2, VM3, VM4 and VM5 + +* Delete all networks, subnets and routers: networks N1 and N2 including subnets SN1 and SN2, router R1 + +* Delete all network and router associations and VPN1 + + +Pass / fail criteria +'''''''''''''''''''' + +This test evaluates the capability of the NFVi and VIM to provide routed IP +connectivity between VMs by means of BGP/MPLS VPNs. Specifically, the test +verifies that: + +* VMs in the same Neutron subnet have IP connectivity regardless of the import + and export route target configuration of BGP/MPLS VPNs (test assertion 1, 2, 4) + +* VMs in different Neutron subnets do not have IP connectivity by default - in + this case without associating VPNs with the same import and export route + targets to the Neutron networks or connected Neutron routers (test assertion 3). + +* VMs in two different Neutron subnets have routed IP connectivity after + associating the first network and a router connected to the second network + with BGP/MPLS VPNs which have been configured with the same import and export + route targets (test assertion 5, 6). Hence, adjusting the ingress and egress + route targets enables as well as prohibits routing. + +* Network and router associations are equivalent methods for binding Neutron networks + to VPN. + +In order to pass this test, all test assertions listed in the test execution +above need to pass. + + +Post conditions +--------------- + +N/A + +--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- +Test Case 4 - Verify interworking of router and network associations with floating IP functionality +--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- + +Short Name +---------- + +opnfv.sdnvpn.router_association_floating_ip + + +Use case specification +---------------------- + +This test evaluates if both the router association and network association +mechanisms interwork with floating IP functionality. + +Specifically, the test network topology comprises two networks N1 and N2 with +corresponding subnets. Additionally, network N1 is connected to a router R1. +This test verifies that i) a VPN V1 provides connectivity between both networks +when applying a router association to router R1 and a network association to +network N2 and ii) a VM in network N1 is reachable externally by means of a +floating IP. + + +Test preconditions +------------------ + +At least one compute node is available. + +Basic test flow execution description and pass/fail criteria +------------------------------------------------------------ + +Methodology for verifying connectivity +'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' + +Connectivity between VMs is tested by sending ICMP ping packets between +selected VMs. The target IPs are passed to the VMs sending pings by means of a +custom user data script. Whether or not a ping was successful is determined by +checking the console output of the source VMs. + + +Test execution +'''''''''''''' + +* Create a network N1, a subnet SN1 with IP range 10.10.10.0/24 and a connected router R1 +* Create a network N2 with IP range 10.10.20.0/24 + +* Create VM1 with a port in network N1 +* Create VM2 with a port in network N2 + +* Create VPN1 +* Create a router association between router R1 and VPN1 +* Create a network association between network N2 and VPN1 + + +* VM1 sends ICMP packets to VM2 using ``ping`` + +* **Test assertion 1:** Ping from VM1 to VM2 succeeds: ``ping`` exits with return code 0 + +* Assign a floating IP to VM1 + +* The host running the test framework sends ICMP packets to VM1 using ``ping`` + +* **Test assertion 2:** Ping from the host running the test framework to the + floating IP of VM1 succeeds: ``ping`` exits with return code 0 + +* Delete floating IP assigned to VM1 + +* Delete all instances: VM1, VM2 + +* Delete all networks, subnets and routers: networks N1 and N2 including subnets SN1 and SN2, router R1 + +* Delete all network and router associations as well as VPN1 + + +Pass / fail criteria +'''''''''''''''''''' + +This test evaluates the capability of the NFVi and VIM to provide routed IP +connectivity between VMs by means of BGP/MPLS VPNs. Specifically, the test +verifies that: + +* VMs in the same Neutron subnet have IP connectivity regardless of the import + and export route target configuration of BGP/MPLS VPNs (test assertion 1) + +* VMs connected to a network which has been associated with a BGP/MPLS VPN are + reachable through floating IPs. + +In order to pass this test, all test assertions listed in the test execution +above need to pass. + Post conditions --------------- -TBD - should there be any other than the system is in the same state it started out as? +N/A diff --git a/docs/testing/user/userguide/cli_reference.rst b/docs/testing/user/userguide/cli_reference.rst new file mode 100644 index 00000000..719a991f --- /dev/null +++ b/docs/testing/user/userguide/cli_reference.rst @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ +.. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. +.. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 +.. (c) OPNFV + +========================================= +Dovetail Command Line Interface Reference +========================================= + + diff --git a/docs/testing/user/userguide/index.rst b/docs/testing/user/userguide/index.rst index d8eb124b..aec3e861 100644 --- a/docs/testing/user/userguide/index.rst +++ b/docs/testing/user/userguide/index.rst @@ -1,479 +1,12 @@ .. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. .. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 -.. (c) Ericsson AB +.. (c) OPNFV -============================================== -Compliance and Verification program user guide -============================================== +******************************************************** +Compliance Verification Program Testing User Guide +******************************************************** .. toctree:: :maxdepth: 2 -Version history -=============== - -+------------+----------+------------------+----------------------------------+ -| **Date** | **Ver.** | **Author** | **Comment** | -| | | | | -+------------+----------+------------------+----------------------------------+ -| 2017-03-15 | 0.0.1 | Chris Price | Draft version | -| | | | | -+------------+----------+------------------+----------------------------------+ - - -Dovetail CVP Testing Overview -============================= - -The Dovetail testing framework consists of two major parts: the testing client that executes -all test cases in a vendor lab (self-testing) or a third party lab, and the server system that -is under the OPNFV's administration to store and view test results based on OPNFV Test API. The -following diagram illustrates this overall framework. - -/* here is a draft diagram that needs to be revised when exact information is known and fixed */ - -This section mainly focuses on helping the testers in the vendor's domain attempting to run the -CVP tests. - -Dovetail client tool (or just Dovetail tool or Dovetail for short) can be installed in the -jumphost either directly as Python software, or as a Docker(r) container. Comments of pros -and cons of the two options TBD. - -The section 'Installing the test tool'_ describes the steps the tester needs to take to install -Dovetail directly from the source. In 2.3, we describe steps needed for installing Dovetail -Docker(r) container. Once installed, and properly configured, the remaining test process is mostly -identical for the two options. In 2.4, we go over the steps of actually running the test suite. -In 2.5, we discuss how to view test results and make sense of them, for example, what the tester -may do in case of unexpected test failures. Section 2.6 describes additional Dovetail features -that are not absolutely necessary in CVP testing but users may find useful for other purposes. -One example is to run Dovetail for in-house testing as preparation before official CVP testing; -another example is to run Dovetail experimental test suites other than the CVP test suite. -Experimental tests may be made available by the community for experimenting less mature test -cases or functionalities for the purpose of getting feedbacks for improvement. - -Installing the test tool -======================== - -Before taking this step, testers should check the hardware and networking requirements of -the POD, and the jumphost in particular, to make sure they are compliant. - -In this section, we describe the procedure to install Dovetail client tool that runs the CVP -test suite from the jumphost. The jumphost must have network access to both the public Internet -and to the O&M (Operation and Management) network with access rights to all VIM APIs being tested. - -------------------------------- -Checking the Jumphost Readiness -------------------------------- - -While Dovetail does not have hard requirement on a specific operating system type or version, -these have been validated by the community through some level of exercise in OPNFV labs or PlugFests. - -Ubuntu 16.04.2 LTS (Xenial) for x86_64 -Ubuntu 14.04 LTS (Trusty) for x86_64 -CentOS-7-1611 for x86_64 -Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.3 for x86_64 -Fedora 24 Server for x86_64 -Fedora 25 Server for x86_64 - ------------------------------------- -Configuring the Jumphost Environment ------------------------------------- - -/* First, openstack env variables to be passed to Functest */ - -The jumphost needs to have the right environmental variable setting to enable access to the -Openstack API. This is usually done through the Openstack credential file. - -Sample Openstack credential file environment_config.sh: - -/*Project-level authentication scope (name or ID), recommend admin project.*/ - -export OS_PROJECT_NAME=admin - -/* Authentication username, belongs to the project above, recommend admin user.*/ - -export OS_USERNAME=admin - - -/* Authentication password.*/ - -export OS_PASSWORD=secret - - -/* Authentication URL, one of the endpoints of keystone service. If this is v3 version, there need some extra variables as follows.*/ - -export OS_AUTH_URL='http://xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:5000/v3' - - -/* Default is 2.0. If use keystone v3 API, this should be set as 3.*/ - -export OS_IDENTITY_API_VERSION=3 - - -/* Domain name or ID containing the user above. Command to check the domain: openstack -user show <OS_USERNAME>*/ - -export OS_USER_DOMAIN_NAME=default - - -/* Domain name or ID containing the project above. Command to check the domain: openstack -project show <OS_PROJECT_NAME>*/ - -export OS_PROJECT_DOMAIN_NAME=default - - -/* home directory for dovetail, if install Dovetail Docker container, DOVETAIL_HOME can -just be /home/opnfv*/ - -export DOVETAIL_HOME=$HOME/cvp - -Export all these variables into environment by, - -% source <OpenStack-credential-file-path> - - -The tester should validate that the Openstack environmental settings are correct by, -% openstack service list - ------------------------------------ -Installing Prerequisite on Jumphost ------------------------------------ - -1. Dovetail requires Python 2.7 and later - -Use the following steps to check if the right version of python is already installed, -and if not, install it. - -% python --version - -2. Dovetail requires Docker 1.8.0 and later - -Use the following steps to check if the right version of Docker is already installed, -and if not, install it. - -% docker --version - -As the docker installation process is much complex, you can refer to the official -document: https://docs.docker.com/engine/installation/linux/ - -------------------------------------- -2.2.4 Installing Dovetail on Jumphost -------------------------------------- - -A tester can choose one of the following two methods for installing and running Dovetail. -In part1, we explain the steps to install Dovetail from the source. In part2, an alternative -using a Docker image with preinstalled Dovetail is introduced. part1. Installing Dovetail directly - -Update and install packages - -a) Ubuntu - -sudo apt-get update - -sudo apt-get -y install gcc git vim python-dev python-pip --no-install-recommends - -b) centos and redhat - -sudo yum -y update - -sudo yum -y install epel-release - -sudo yum -y install gcc git vim-enhanced python-devel python-pip - -c) fedora - -sudo dnf -y update - -sudo dnf -y install gcc git vim-enhanced python-devel python-pip redhat-rpm-config - -p.s When testing SUT's https service, there need some extra packages, such as -apt-transport-https. This still remains to be verified. - - -Installing Dovetail - -Now we are ready to install Dovetail. - -/* Version of dovetail is not specified yet? we are still using the latest in the master -- this needs to be fixed before launch. */ - -First change directory to $DOVETAIL_HOME, - -% cd $DOVETAIL_HOME - -% sudo git clone https://git.opnfv.org/dovetail - -% cd $DOVETAIL_HOME/dovetail - -% sudo pip install -e ./ - -/* test dovetail install is successful */ - -% dovetail -h -part2. Installing Dovetail Docker Container - -The Dovetail project also maintains a Docker image that has Dovetail test tools preinstalled. - -Running CVP Test Suite -====================== - ------------------- -Running Test Suite ------------------- - -The Dovetail client CLI allows the tester to specify which test suite to run. -By default the results are stored in a local file $DOVETAIL_HOME/dovetail/results. - -% dovetail run --testsuite <test suite name> --openrc <path-to-openrc-file> /*?? */ - -Multiple test suites may be available, testsuites named "debug" and "proposed_tests" are just provided for testing. But for the purpose of running CVP test suite, the test suite name follows the following format, - -CVP.<major>.<minor>.<patch> /* test if this format works */ - -For example, CVP_1_0_0 - -% dovetail run --testsuite CVP_1_0_0 - -When the SUT's VIM (Virtual Infrastructure Manager) is Openstack, its configuration is commonly defined in the openrc file. In that case, you can specify the openrc file in the command line, - -% dovetail run --testsuite CVP_1_0_0 --openrc <path-to-openrc-file> - -In order to report official results to OPNFV, run the CVP test suite and report to OPNFV official URL, - -% dovetail run --testsuite <test suite name> --openrc <path-to-openrc-file> --report https://www.opnfv.org/cvp - -The official server https://www.opnfv.org/cvp is still under development, there is a temporal server to use http://205.177.226.237:9997/api/v1/results - --------------------------------- -Making Sense of CVP Test Results --------------------------------- - -When a tester is performing trial runs, Dovetail stores results in a local file by default. - -% cd $DOVETAIL_HOME/dovetail/results - - - -1. local file - -a) Log file: dovetail.log - -/* review the dovetail.log to see if all important information has been captured - in default mode without DEBUG */ - -/* the end of the log file has a summary of all test case test results */ - -Additional log files may be of interests: refstack.log, opnfv_yardstick_tcXXX.out ... - -b) Example: Openstack refstack test case example - -can see the log details in refstack.log, which has the passed/skipped/failed test cases result, the failed test cases have rich debug information - -for the users to see why this test case fails. - -c) Example: OPNFV Yardstick test case example - -for yardstick tool, its log is stored in yardstick.log - -for each test case result in Yardstick, the logs are stored in opnfv_yardstick_tcXXX.out, respectively. - - - -2. OPNFV web interface - -wait for the complement of LF, test community, etc. -2.3.3 Updating Dovetail or Test Suite - -% cd $DOVETAIL_HOME/dovetail - -% sudo git pull - -% sudo pip install -e ./ - -This step is necessary if dovetail software or the CVP test suite have updates. - - -Other Dovetail Usage -==================== - ------------------------- -Running Dovetail Locally ------------------------- - -/*DB*/ - ---------------------------------------------- -Running Dovetail with Experimental Test Cases ---------------------------------------------- - - --------------------------------------------------- -Running Individual Test Cases or for Special Cases --------------------------------------------------- - -1. Refstack client to run Defcore testcases - -a) By default, for Defcore test cases run by Refstack-client, which are consumed by -DoveTail, are run followed with automatically generated configuration file, i.e., -refstack_tempest.conf. - -In some circumstances, the automatic configuration file may not quite satisfied with -the SUT, DoveTail provide a way for users to set its configuration file according -to its own SUT manually, - -besides, the users should define Defcore testcase file, i.e., defcore.txt, at the -same time. The steps are shown as, - -when "Installing Dovetail Docker Container" method is used, - - -% sudo mkdir /home/opnfv/dovetail/userconfig - -% cd /home/opnfv/dovetail/userconfig - -% touch refstack_tempest.conf defcore.txt - -% vim refstack_tempest.conf - -% vim defcore.txt - - -the recommend way to set refstack_tempest.conf is shown in -https://aptira.com/testing-openstack-tempest-part-1/ - -the recommended way to edit defcore.txt is to open -https://refstack.openstack.org/api/v1/guidelines/2016.08/tests?target=compute&type=required&alias=true&flag=false -and copy all the test cases into defcore.txt. - -Then use “docker run” to create a container, - - -% sudo docker run --privileged=true -it -v <openrc_path>:<openrc_path> \ - --v /home/opnfv/dovetail/results:/home/opnfv/dovetail/results \ - --v /home/opnfv/dovetail/userconfig:/home/opnfv/dovetail/userconfig \ - --v /var/run/docker.sock:/var/run/docker.sock \ - ---name <DoveTail_Container_Name> (optional) \ - -opnfv/dovetail:<Tag> /bin/bash - - - -there is a need to adjust the CVP_1_0_0 testsuite, for dovetail, -defcore.tc001.yml and defcore.tc002.yml are used for automatic and -manual running method, respectively. - -Inside the dovetail container, - - -% cd /home/opnfv/dovetail/compliance - -% vim CVP_1_0_0.yml - - -to add defcore.tc002 and annotate defcore.tc001. - - -b) when "Installing Dovetail Directly" method is used, before to run -the dovetail commands, there is a need to set configuration file and -defcore test cases file - - -% cd $DOVETAIL_HOME/dovetail - -% mkdir userconfig - -% cd userconfig - -% touch refstack_tempest.conf defcore.txt - -% vim refstack_tempest.conf - -% vim defcore.txt - -recommended way to set refstack_tempest.conf and defcore.txt is -same as above in "Installing Dovetail Docker Container" method section. - - - -For Defcore test cases manually running method, there is a need to adjust -the compliance_set test suite, - -for dovetail, defcore.tc001.yml and defcore.tc002.yml are used for automatic -and manual running method, respectively. - - - -% cd $DOVETAIL_HOME/dovetail/compliance - -% vim CVP_1_0_0.yml - - -to add defcore.tc002 and annotate defcore.tc001 - -3 Dovetail Client CLI Manual - -This section contains a brief manual for all the features available through the Dovetail client command line interface (CLI). -3.1 Check dovetail commands - -% dovetail -h - -dovetail.PNG - -Dovetail has three commands: list, run and show. -6.2 List -6.2.1 List help - -% dovetail list -h - -list-help.PNG -6.2.2 List a test suite - -List command will list all test cases belong to the given test suite. - -% dovetail list compliance_set - -list-compliance.PNG - -% dovetail list debug - -list-debug.PNG - -The ipv6, example and nfvi are test areas. If no <TESTSUITE> is given, it will list all testsuites. -6.3 Show - -Show command will give the detailed info of one certain test case. -6.3.1 Show help - -% dovetail show -h - -show-help.PNG -6.3.2 Show test case - -show-ipv6.PNG -6.4 Run - -Dovetail supports running a named test suite, or one named test area of a test suite. -6.4.1 Run help - -% dovetail run -h - -run-help.PNGThere are some options: - -func_tag: set FuncTest’s Docker tag, for example stable,latest and danube.1.0 - -openrc: give the path of OpenStack credential file - -yard_tag: set Yardstick’s Docker tag - -testarea: set a certain testarea within a certain testsuite - -offline: run without pull the docker images, and it requires the jumphost to have these images locally. This will ensure DoveTail run in an offline environment. - -report: push results to DB or store with files - -testsuite: set the testsuite to be tested - -debug: flag to show the debug log messages - + testing_guide.rst diff --git a/docs/testing/user/userguide/testing_guide.rst b/docs/testing/user/userguide/testing_guide.rst new file mode 100644 index 00000000..3a9c6dc4 --- /dev/null +++ b/docs/testing/user/userguide/testing_guide.rst @@ -0,0 +1,608 @@ +.. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. +.. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 +.. (c) OPNFV, Huawei Technologies Co.,Ltd and others. + +========================================== +Conducting CVP Testing with Dovetail +========================================== + +Overview +------------------------------ + +The Dovetail testing framework for CVP consists of two major parts: the testing client that +executes all test cases in a lab (vendor self-testing or a third party lab), +and the server system that is hosted by the CVP administrator to store and +view test results based on a web API. The following diagram illustrates +this overall framework. + +.. image:: ../../../images/dovetail_online_mode.png + :align: center + :scale: 50% + +Within the tester's lab, the Test Host is the machine where Dovetail executes all +automated test cases. As it hosts the test harness, the Test Host must not be part of +the System Under Test (SUT) itself. +The above diagram assumes that the tester's Test Host is situated in a DMZ which +has internal network access to the SUT and external access to the OPNFV server +via the public Internet. +This arrangement may not be supported in some labs. +Dovetail also supports an offline mode of testing that is +illustrated in the next diagram. + +.. image:: ../../../images/dovetail_offline_mode.png + :align: center + :scale: 50% + +In the offline mode, the Test Host only needs to have access to the SUT +via the internal network, but does not need to connect to the public Internet. This +user guide will highlight differences between the online and offline modes of +the Test Host. While it is possible to run the Test Host as a virtual machine, +this user guide assumes it is a physical machine for simplicity. + +The rest of this guide will describe how to install the Dovetail tool as a +Docker container image, go over the steps of running the CVP test suite, and +then discuss how to view test results and make sense of them. + +Readers interested +in using Dovetail for its functionalities beyond CVP testing, e.g. for in-house +or extended testing, should consult the Dovetail developer's guide for additional +information. + +Installing Dovetail +-------------------- + +In this section, we describe the procedure to install Dovetail client tool on the Test Host. +The Test Host must have network access to the management network with access rights to +the Virtual Infrastructure Manager's API. + +Checking the Test Host Readiness +^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ + +The Test Host must have network access to the Virtual Infrastructure Manager's API +hosted in the SUT so that the Dovetail tool can exercise the API from the Test Host. +It must also have ``ssh`` access to the Linux operating system +of the compute nodes in the SUT. The ``ssh`` mechanism is used by some test cases +to generate test events in the compute nodes. You can find out which test cases +use this mechanism in the test specification document. + +We have tested the Dovetail tool on the following host operating systems. Other versions +or distribution of Linux may also work, but community support may be more available on +these versions. + +- Ubuntu 16.04.2 LTS (Xenial) or 14.04 LTS (Trusty) +- CentOS-7-1611 +- Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.3 +- Fedora 24 or 25 Server + +Non-Linux operating systems, such as Windows, Mac OS, have not been tested +and are not supported. + +If online mode is used, the tester should also validate that the Test Host can reach +the public Internet. For example, + +.. code-block:: bash + + $ ping www.opnfv.org + PING www.opnfv.org (50.56.49.117): 56 data bytes + 64 bytes from 50.56.49.117: icmp_seq=0 ttl=48 time=52.952 ms + 64 bytes from 50.56.49.117: icmp_seq=1 ttl=48 time=53.805 ms + 64 bytes from 50.56.49.117: icmp_seq=2 ttl=48 time=53.349 ms + ... + + +Or, if the lab environment does not allow ping, try validating it using HTTPS instead. + +.. code-block:: bash + + $ curl https://www.opnfv.org + <!doctype html> + + + <html lang="en-US" class="no-js"> + <head> + ... + + +Configuring the Test Host Environment +^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ + +The Test Host needs a few environment variables set correctly in order to access the +Openstack API required to drive the Dovetail tests. For convenience and as a convention, +we will also create a home directory for storing all Dovetail related config files and +results files: + +.. code-block:: bash + + $ mkdir -p /home/dovetail + $ export DOVETAIL_HOME=/home/dovetail + +Here we set dovetail home directory to be ``/home/dovetail`` for an example. +Then create a directory named ``pre_config`` in this directory to store all +Dovetail related config files: + +.. code-block:: bash + + $ mkdir -p ${DOVETAIL_HOME}/pre_config + +At this point, you will need to consult your SUT (Openstack) administrator to correctly set +the configurations in a file named ``env_config.sh``. +The Openstack settings need to be configured such that the Dovetail client has all the necessary +credentials and privileges to execute all test operations. If the SUT uses terms +somewhat differently from the standard Openstack naming, you will need to adjust +this file accordingly. + +Create and edit the file ``${DOVETAIL_HOME}/pre_config/env_config.sh`` so that +all parameters are set correctly to match your SUT. Here is an example of what +this file should contain. + +.. code-block:: bash + + $ cat ${DOVETAIL_HOME}/pre_config/env_config.sh + + # Project-level authentication scope (name or ID), recommend admin project. + export OS_PROJECT_NAME=admin + + # For identity v2, it uses OS_TENANT_NAME rather than OS_PROJECT_NAME. + export OS_TENANT_NAME=admin + + # Authentication username, belongs to the project above, recommend admin user. + export OS_USERNAME=admin + + # Authentication password. Use your own password + export OS_PASSWORD=xxxxxxxx + + # Authentication URL, one of the endpoints of keystone service. If this is v3 version, + # there need some extra variables as follows. + export OS_AUTH_URL='http://xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:5000/v3' + + # Default is 2.0. If use keystone v3 API, this should be set as 3. + export OS_IDENTITY_API_VERSION=3 + + # Domain name or ID containing the user above. + # Command to check the domain: openstack user show <OS_USERNAME> + export OS_USER_DOMAIN_NAME=default + + # Domain name or ID containing the project above. + # Command to check the domain: openstack project show <OS_PROJECT_NAME> + export OS_PROJECT_DOMAIN_NAME=default + + # Home directory for dovetail that you have created before. + export DOVETAIL_HOME=/home/dovetail + + # Special environment parameters for https. + # If using https + cacert, the path of cacert file should be provided. + # The cacert file should be put at $DOVETAIL_HOME/pre_config. + export OS_CACERT=$DOVETAIL_HOME/pre_config/cacert.pem + + # If using https + no cacert, should add OS_INSECURE environment parameter. + export OS_INSECURE=True + + +Export all these variables into environment by, + +.. code-block:: bash + + $ source ${DOVETAIL_HOME}/pre_config/env_config.sh + +If OpenStack client is installed, you can validate that the OpenStack environmental +settings are correct by, + +.. code-block:: bash + + $ openstack service list + +If the SUT uses https but have no cacert, you can validate the OpenStack environmental +settings by, + +.. code-block:: bash + + $ openstack --insecure service list + +If your SUT uses hosts file to translate hostnames into the IP +of OS_AUTH_URL, then you need to provide these hosts info in file +``$DOVETAIL_HOME/pre_config/hosts.yaml``. + +Create and edit file ``$DOVETAIL_HOME/pre_config/hosts.yaml``. Here is an example of +what this file should contain. + +.. code-block:: bash + + $ cat ${DOVETAIL_HOME}/pre_config/hosts.yaml + + --- + hosts_info: + - image.xx.xx.xx.com:172.xxx.xxx.xxx + - compute.xx.xx.xx.com:172.xxx.xxx.xxx + - <Hostname>:<IPaddress> + +Installing Prerequisite on the Test Host +^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ + +The main prerequisite software for Dovetail are Python and Docker. + +In the CVP test suite for the Danube release, Dovetail requires Python 2.7. Python 3.x +is not supported at this time. + +Use the following steps to check if the right version of python is already installed, +and if not, install it. + +.. code-block:: bash + + $ python --version + Python 2.7.6 + +If your Test Host does not have Python installed, or the version is not 2.7, you +should consult Python installation guides corresponding to the operating system +in your Test Host on how to install Python 2.7. + +Dovetail does not work with Docker versions prior to 1.12.3. We have validated +Dovetail with Docker 17.03 CE. Other versions of Docker later than 1.12.3 may +also work, but community support may be more available on Docker 17.03 CE. + +.. code-block:: bash + + $ sudo docker version + Client: + Version: 17.03.1-ce + API version: 1.27 + Go version: go1.7.5 + Git commit: c6d412e + Built: Mon Mar 27 17:10:36 2017 + OS/Arch: linux/amd64 + + Server: + Version: 17.03.1-ce + API version: 1.27 (minimum version 1.12) + Go version: go1.7.5 + Git commit: c6d412e + Built: Mon Mar 27 17:10:36 2017 + OS/Arch: linux/amd64 + Experimental: false + +If your Test Host does not have Docker installed, or Docker is older than 1.12.3, +or you have Docker version other than 17.03 CE and wish to change, +you will need to install, upgrade, or re-install in order to run Dovetail. +The Docker installation process +can be more complex, you should refer to the official +Docker installation guide that is relevant to your Test Host's operating system. + +The above installation steps assume that the Test Host is in the online mode. For offline +testing, use the following offline installation steps instead. + +In order to install or upgrade Python offline, you may download packaged Python 2.7 +for your Test Host's operating system on a connected host, copy the packge to +the Test Host, then install from that local copy. + +In order to install Docker offline, download Docker static binaries and copy the +tar file to the Test Host, such as for Ubuntu14.04, you may follow the following link +to install, + +.. code-block:: bash + + https://github.com/meetyg/docker-offline-install + + +Installing Dovetail on the Test Host +^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ + +The Dovetail project maintains a Docker image that has Dovetail test tools preinstalled. +This Docker image is tagged with versions. Before pulling the Dovetail image, check the +OPNFV's CVP web page first to determine the right tag for CVP testing. + +If the Test Host is online, you can directly pull Dovetail Docker image and download ubuntu +and cirros images. + +.. code-block:: bash + + $ sudo wget -nc http://artifacts.opnfv.org/sdnvpn/ubuntu-16.04-server-cloudimg-amd64-disk1.img -P ${DOVETAIL_HOME}/pre_config + $ sudo wget -nc http://download.cirros-cloud.net/0.3.5/cirros-0.3.5-x86_64-disk.img -P ${DOVETAIL_HOME}/pre_config + + $ sudo docker pull opnfv/dovetail:cvp.0.6.0 + cvp.0.6.0: Pulling from opnfv/dovetail + 30d541b48fc0: Pull complete + 8ecd7f80d390: Pull complete + 46ec9927bb81: Pull complete + 2e67a4d67b44: Pull complete + 7d9dd9155488: Pull complete + cc79be29f08e: Pull complete + e102eed9bf6a: Pull complete + 952b8a9d2150: Pull complete + bfbb639d1f38: Pull complete + bf7c644692de: Pull complete + cdc345e3f363: Pull complete + Digest: sha256:d571b1073b2fdada79562e8cc67f63018e8d89268ff7faabee3380202c05edee + Status: Downloaded newer image for opnfv/dovetail:cvp.0.6.0 + +An example of the <tag> is *cvp.0.6.0*. + +If the Test Host is offline, you will need to first pull the Dovetail Docker image, and all the +dependent images that Dovetail uses, to a host that is online. The reason that you need +to pull all dependent images is because Dovetail normally does dependency checking at run-time +and automatically pull images as needed, if the Test Host is online. If the Test Host is +offline, then all these dependencies will also need to be manually copied. + +.. code-block:: bash + + $ sudo docker pull opnfv/dovetail:cvp.0.6.0 + $ sudo docker pull opnfv/functest:cvp.0.5.0 + $ sudo docker pull opnfv/yardstick:danube.3.2 + $ sudo docker pull opnfv/bottlenecks:cvp.0.4.0 + $ sudo wget -nc http://artifacts.opnfv.org/sdnvpn/ubuntu-16.04-server-cloudimg-amd64-disk1.img -P {ANY_DIR} + $ sudo wget -nc http://download.cirros-cloud.net/0.3.5/cirros-0.3.5-x86_64-disk.img -P {ANY_DIR} + +Once all these images are pulled, save the images, copy to the Test Host, and then load +the Dovetail and all dependent images at the Test Host. + +At the online host, save images. + +.. code-block:: bash + + $ sudo docker save -o dovetail.tar opnfv/dovetail:cvp.0.6.0 opnfv/functest:cvp.0.5.0 \ + opnfv/yardstick:danube.3.2 opnfv/bottlenecks:cvp.0.4.0 + +Copy dovetail.tar file to the Test Host, and then load the images on the Test Host. + +.. code-block:: bash + + $ sudo docker load --input dovetail.tar + +Copy sdnvpn test area image ubuntu-16.04-server-cloudimg-amd64-disk1.img to ``${DOVETAIL_HOME}/pre_config/``. +Copy cirros image cirros-0.3.5-x86_64-disk.img to ``${DOVETAIL_HOME}/pre_config/``. + +Now check to see that all Docker images have been pulled or loaded properly. + +.. code-block:: bash + + $ sudo docker images + REPOSITORY TAG IMAGE ID CREATED SIZE + opnfv/functest cvp.0.5.0 9eaeaea5f203 8 days ago 1.53GB + opnfv/dovetail cvp.0.6.0 5d25b289451c 8 days ago 516MB + opnfv/yardstick danube.3.2 574596b6ea12 8 days ago 1.2GB + opnfv/bottlenecks cvp.0.4.0 00450688bcae 3 hours ago 622 MB + +Regardless of whether you pulled down the Dovetail image directly online, or loaded from +a static image tar file, you are ready to run Dovetail. + +.. code-block:: bash + + $ sudo docker run --privileged=true -it \ + -e DOVETAIL_HOME=$DOVETAIL_HOME \ + -v $DOVETAIL_HOME:$DOVETAIL_HOME \ + -v /var/run/docker.sock:/var/run/docker.sock \ + opnfv/dovetail:<tag> /bin/bash + +The ``-e`` options set the env variables in the container and the ``-v`` options map files +in the host to files in the container. + +Running the CVP Test Suite +---------------------------- + +Now you should be in the Dovetail container's prompt and ready to execute +test suites. + +The Dovetail client CLI allows the tester to specify which test suite to run. +By default the results are stored in a local file ``$DOVETAIL_HOME/results``. + +.. code-block:: bash + + $ dovetail run --testsuite <test-suite-name> + +If you want to see more DEBUG logs, ``--debug`` should be added. + +.. code-block:: bash + + $ dovetail run --testsuite <test-suite-name> --debug + +If the Test Host is offline, ``--offline`` should be added to support running with +local resources. + +.. code-block:: bash + + $ dovetail run --testsuite <test-suite-name> --offline + +Multiple test suites may be available. For the purpose of running +CVP test suite, the test suite name follows the following format, +``CVP_<major>_<minor>_<patch>`` +For example, CVP_1_0_0. + +.. code-block:: bash + + $ dovetail run --testsuite CVP_1_0_0 + +If you are not running the entire test suite, you can choose to run an +individual test area instead. + +.. code-block:: bash + + $ dovetail run --testsuite CVP_1_0_0 --testarea ipv6 + +Until the official test suite is approved and released, you can use +the *proposed_tests* for your trial runs, like this. + +.. code-block:: bash + + $ dovetail run --testsuite proposed_tests --testarea ipv6 + 2017-05-23 05:01:49,488 - run - INFO - ================================================ + 2017-05-23 05:01:49,488 - run - INFO - Dovetail compliance: proposed_tests! + 2017-05-23 05:01:49,488 - run - INFO - ================================================ + 2017-05-23 05:01:49,488 - run - INFO - Build tag: daily-master-4bdde6b8-afa6-40bb-8fc9-5d568d74c8d7 + 2017-05-23 05:01:49,536 - run - INFO - + 2017-05-23 05:01:49,710 - run - INFO - >>[testcase]: dovetail.ipv6.tc001 + 2017-05-23 05:08:22,532 - run - INFO - Results have been stored with file /home/dovetail/results/functest_results.txt. + 2017-05-23 05:08:22,538 - run - INFO - >>[testcase]: dovetail.ipv6.tc002 + ... + +Special Configuration for Running HA Test Cases +^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ + +HA test cases need to know the info of a controller node of the OpenStack. +It should include the node's name, role, ip, as well as the user and key_filename +or password to login the node. Users should create file +``${DOVETAIL_HOME}/pre_config/pod.yaml`` to store the info. + +There is a sample file for users. + +.. code-block:: bash + + nodes: + - + # This can not be changed and must be node1. + name: node1 + + # This must be controller. + role: Controller + + # This is the install IP of a controller node. + ip: xx.xx.xx.xx + + # User name of this node. This user must have sudo privileges. + user: root + + # Password of the user. + password: root + +Besides the 'password', user could also provide 'key_filename' to login the node. +Users need to create file ``$DOVETAIL_HOME/pre_config/id_rsa`` to store the private key. + +.. code-block:: bash + + nodes: + - + name: node1 + role: Controller + ip: 10.1.0.50 + user: root + + # Private key of this node. It must be /root/.ssh/id_rsa + # Dovetail will move the key file from $DOVETAIL_HOME/pre_config/id_rsa + # to /root/.ssh/id_rsa of Yardstick container + key_filename: /root/.ssh/id_rsa + + +Special Configuration for Running defcore, IPv6 and tempest Test Cases +^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ + +All test cases in test area defcore, ipv6 and tempest are picked up from Tempest. +For all these test cases, they need some configurations. Most of them +are done by Dovetail. However, there are still some configurations needed to be +given by users who know the SUT better. All these additional configurations should +be in file ``$DOVETAIL_HOME/pre_config/tempest_conf.yaml``. If this file is not given, +some test cases will be skipped or failed. + +Create and edit file ``$DOVETAIL_HOME/pre_config/tempest_conf.yaml``. +Here is an example of what this file should contain. + +.. code-block:: bash + + compute: + # The minimum number of compute nodes expected. + # This should be no less than 2 and no larger than the compute nodes the SUT actually has. + min_compute_nodes: 2 + + # Expected device name when a volume is attached to an instance. + volume_device_name: vdb + + # Lower version of the test target microversion range. + min_microversion: 2.2 + + # Upper version of the test target microversion range. + max_microversion: latest + + +Making Sense of CVP Test Results +^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ + +When a tester is performing trial runs, Dovetail stores results in a local file by default. + +.. code-block:: bash + + cd $DOVETAIL_HOME/results + +#. Local file + + * Log file: dovetail.log + + * Review the dovetail.log to see if all important information has been captured + - in default mode without DEBUG. + + * The end of the log file has a summary of all test case test results. + + * Additional log files may be of interests: refstack.log, dovetail_ha_tcXXX.out ... + + * Example: defcore test case example + + * Can see the log details in ``defcore_logs/dovetail.defcore.tc001.log``, + which has the passed, skipped and failed test cases results. + + * The skipped test cases have the reason for the users to see why these test cases skipped. + + * The failed test cases have rich debug information for the users to see why these test cases fail. + + * Example: vping test case example + + * Its log is stored in dovetail.log. + + * Its result is stored in functest_results.txt. + + * Example: ha test case example + + * Its log is stored in dovetail.log. + + * Its result is stored in dovetail_ha_tcXXX.out. + + * Example: ipv6, sdnvpn and tempest test cases examples + + * Can see the log details in ``ipv6_logs/dovetail.ipv6.tcXXX.log``, + ``sdnvpn_logs/dovetail.sdnvpn.tcXXX.log`` and ``tempest_logs/dovetail.tempest.tcXXX.log``, + respectively. They all have the passed, skipped and failed test cases results. + +#. OPNFV web interface + CVP will host a web site to collect test results. Users can upload their results to this web site, + so they can review these results in the future. + + * web site url + + * Wait for the complement of LF, test community, etc. + + * Sign in / Sign up + + * You need to sign in you account, then you can upload results, and check your private results. + CVP is now using openstack id as account provider, but will soon support Linux Foundation ID + as well. + + * If you already have a openstack id, you can sign in directly with your id. + + * If you do not have a openstack id, you can sign up a new one on the sign up page. + + * If you do not sign in, you can only check the community results. + + * My results + + * This page lists all results uploaded by you after you signed in, + + * You can also upload your results on this page. + + * There is a *choose file* button, once you click it, you can choose your reuslt file in your harddisk + then click the *upload* button, and you will see a results id once your uploading succeed. + + * Check the *review* box to submit your result to the OPNFV. Uncheck the box to withdraw your result. + + * profile + + * This page shows your account info after you signed in. + +Updating Dovetail or a Test Suite +^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ + +Follow the instructions in section `Installing Dovetail on the Test Host`_ and +`Running the CVP Test Suite`_ by replacing the docker images with new_tags, + +.. code-block:: bash + + sudo docker pull opnfv/dovetail:<dovetail_new_tag> + sudo docker pull opnfv/functest:<functest_new_tag> + sudo docker pull opnfv/yardstick:<yardstick_new_tag> + +This step is necessary if dovetail software or the CVP test suite have updates. + + |