summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorGeorg Kunz <georg.kunz@ericsson.com>2018-02-11 23:15:58 +0100
committerGeorg Kunz <georg.kunz@ericsson.com>2018-05-02 12:39:50 +0000
commit4fa48a49b82c2cc902843eaf1389d884e1fd45f9 (patch)
tree49621d86eedce06cdb3d7a4c9ed6e9cc917e449c
parentb33fc07ea2cfd7c4bad0dd404ad0cb45dbb476df (diff)
Exemption process for disabling strict API validation
This document describes an exemption process for disabling strict API response validation. Cherry picking to stable/danube for including it in the official documentation. JIRA: DOVETAIL-617 Change-Id: I690efdcae7dd15a6c0781a837a62677904836fca Signed-off-by: Georg Kunz <georg.kunz@ericsson.com> (cherry picked from commit caf95e09ef0206354b46d51f83690e20bc69e848)
-rw-r--r--docs/testing/user/ovpaddendum/exemption-strict-API-validation.rst183
1 files changed, 183 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/docs/testing/user/ovpaddendum/exemption-strict-API-validation.rst b/docs/testing/user/ovpaddendum/exemption-strict-API-validation.rst
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..3acc6ee
--- /dev/null
+++ b/docs/testing/user/ovpaddendum/exemption-strict-API-validation.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,183 @@
+.. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
+.. License.
+.. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
+.. (c) Ericsson and others
+
+==============================================================
+Exemption Process - Disabling Strict API Validation in Tempest
+==============================================================
+
+.. toctree::
+ :maxdepth: 2
+
+
+Introduction
+============
+
+In 2015, the OpenStack QA team introduced a validation mechanism for Nova API
+responses in Tempest [1]_ with the goal of enforcing Nova API micro-versions.
+The API validation mechanism verifies that API responses only contain data
+elements (properties) as explicitly defined in API response schemas [2]_. In
+case additional data elements are found in Nova API responses, the
+corresponding tests fail immediately without asserting whether or not the
+particular API operation actually succeeded or not.
+
+Independently, cloud vendors have extended their commercial OpenStack cloud
+implementations with additional functionality which requires API extensions.
+Consequently, such cloud implementations do not pass Tempest tests which
+validate API responses despite actually implementing and providing the tested
+functionality.
+
+This document describes an exemption process for use within the OPNFV Verified
+Program which
+
+i) allows vendors to pass Tempest tests if the tested functionality is
+ fully supported despite the presence of additional data elements in API
+ responses, and
+
+ii) makes the application of the exemption process transparently visible in
+ test results.
+
+
+Background and benefits for OVP
+===============================
+
+Vendors of commercial NFV products have extended OpenStack to provide
+additional (NFV) functionality to their customers and to fill functional gaps
+in OpenStack. These add-ons potentially extend the OpenStack API in two ways:
+
+i) new API endpoints and
+
+ii) additional attributes returned by existing API endpoints.
+
+New API endpoints typically go unnoticed by OpenStack Tempest tests and hence
+do not interfere with existing tests. In contrast, (Nova) Tempest tests
+actively validate the responses returned by existing API endpoints against
+pre-defined schemas. An API response is considered invalid if additional
+attributes are present (see example below). Hence, this particular type of
+functional extension of OpenStack causes existing Tempest tests to fail,
+irrespective of whether or not the functionality which is supposed to be tested
+is actually available. As a result, a Tempest test failing due to extended API
+responses does not provide information about whether the tested functionality
+is available or not.
+
+The OPNFV Verified Program has inherited the policy to strictly validate API
+responses from OpenStack by including a selection of Tempest tests in its
+compliance test suite. However, it was never discussed if OVP should adopt this
+policy as well. It turns out that this policy causes challenges for vendors of
+commercial NFV offerings to pass the OVP test suite. The exemption process
+outlined in this document aims at allowing to selectively disable strict API
+response validation in order to enable vendors to adopt OVP **if** the tested
+functionality is supported.
+
+It must be clearly understood that this exemption targets **only** the scenario
+in which additional attributes are included in API responses. It does not
+provide a loophole for passing OVP tests if the OpenStack APIs have been
+altered significantly as this is in conflict with the objective of OVP to
+create industry alignment.
+
+In conclusion, the exemption process described here is deemed beneficial for
+both the broader industry as well as for OVP: Enabling adoption of OVP by
+vendors which extended OpenStack API responses facilitates adoption of OVP in
+the industry. The limited validity period of an exemption incentivizes eventual
+alignment within the industry around a clearly specified set of APIs.
+
+
+Example: additional attributes per VM for HA policy
+---------------------------------------------------
+
+This fictional example showcases the presence of an additional attribute in an
+API response. The example shows that the 'server details', i.e. the VM
+metadata, includes an additional attribute 'ha-policy' which is used to
+associate high-availability policies with a VM instance. This attribute is
+utilized by a proprietary add-on component to manage VM migration and recovery
+in case of compute host failures::
+
+ {
+ "server": {
+ "accessIPv4": "1.2.3.4",
+ "config_drive": "",
+ "flavor": {...},
+ "image": {...},
+ "ha_policy": "migrate" <-- additional attribute
+ "name": "new-server-test",
+ "status": "ACTIVE"
+ }
+ }
+
+
+
+Precedent in OpenStack
+======================
+
+In the OpenStack community, the OpenStack Interoperability Working Group
+(Interop WG) [4]_ is maintaining multiple API interoperability compliance
+programs [5]_. These programs utilize Tempest-based tests to determine if a
+given commercial cloud is compliant to a selected set of OpenStack APIs. After
+introduction of the strict API response validation, various cloud products
+which previously passed the compliance program failed validation because of the
+reasons outlined above.
+
+In order to mitigate this situation, the Interop WG consulted with the broader
+OpenStack community [6]_ and eventually introduced an "additional properties
+waiver" for its API compliance programs in July 2016. The waiver was
+created with a clearly defined validity period, covering roughly one year -
+equivalent to three iterations of interoperability guidelines (2015.07,
+2016.01, and 2016.08). The limited lifetime of the waiver was intended to give
+cloud product vendors a transition period for adapting their products to
+achieve full API compliance by the end of the exemption period. All details of
+the waiver are listed in [7]_. Finally, the waiver was officially canceled in
+October 2017 [8]_ after about 15 months.
+
+
+Exemption process for additional properties in API responses in the OVP
+=======================================================================
+
+The details of the exemption process for disabling strict validation of API
+responses is as follows:
+
+#. The Dovetail tool provides a new command line option "--non-strict-api" for
+ disabling strict API validation. This option needs to be explicitly given on
+ the command line to disable strict API validation. If this command line
+ option is omitted, the default behavior (i.e., strict API validation) is
+ applied.
+
+#. The test results created by the Dovetail tool includes an explicit print-out
+ stating if strict API validation was disabled during the test run or not.
+
+#. The OVP portal reads the uploaded result files and indicates for all
+ uploaded test results if strict API validation was disabled or not.
+
+#. Together with the application for certification, a company can request an
+ exemption from the requirement for strict API response checking. A rationale
+ for requesting the exemption has to be provided. The request is either
+ granted or rejected by the C&C committee. The rationale provided must
+ establish that the need for exemption is not in violation of the OVP's
+ objectives.
+
+#. Compliance badges obtained under exemption are valid for one year.
+
+#. OPNFV expects OVP participants to aim for full compliance without requiring
+ exemptions as soon as possible. Hence, an exemption can only be requested
+ twice for the same product (addressing new versions of OVP or new versions
+ of the product).
+
+#. The same logo will be used regardless of being obtained under exemption or
+ not.
+
+#. The exemption will be made available to participants of OVP as part of a
+ service release of OVP 2018.01.
+
+#. The C&C committee will monitor the situation around exemptions and may
+ decide changes to the above process at any time, including the possibility
+ to stop issuing exemptions.
+
+
+.. [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/156130/
+.. [2] https://github.com/openstack/tempest/tree/master/tempest/lib/api_schema/response/compute
+.. [3] https://developer.openstack.org/api-ref/compute/#show-server-details
+.. [4] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Governance/InteropWG
+.. [5] https://refstack.openstack.org/
+.. [6] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-June/097349.html
+.. [7] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/333067/
+.. [8] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/512447/