aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/tools
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorBen Nemec <bnemec@redhat.com>2017-06-26 16:58:13 -0500
committerBen Nemec <bnemec@redhat.com>2017-06-27 11:26:01 -0500
commitf572b764f18cb3c6b54e24c1015a7e4dfcefd65f (patch)
tree519e977ecc4800ddd4a650d76252090a1cf8e984 /tools
parentf7062d83d794aacc74614c165a968884285da957 (diff)
Add validation check for divergent parameter definitions
Many of our parameters are defined in multiple templates, but currently there is no easy way of checking that all of those definitions match. It can be confusing when a parameter is defined one way in one file and another way in a different file. For example, the NovaWorkers description is: Number of workers for Nova API service. and Number of workers for Nova Placement API service. and Number of workers for Nova Conductor service. Which is it actually? All of them. That one parameter controls the workers for all of the nova services, and its description should reflect that, no matter which template you happen to look at. This change adds a check to yaml-validate.py to catch these sorts of inconsistencies and allow us to eventually prevent new ones from getting into the templates. An exclusion mechanism is included because there are some parameter definitions we probably can't/shouldn't change. In particular, this includes the network cidrs which are defaulted to ipv4 addresses in the ipv4 net-iso templates and ipv6 in the ipv6 templates. It's possible a user would be relying on one of those defaults in their configuration, so if we change it they might break. To get around that, the tool explicitly ignores the default field of those parameters, while still checking the description and type fields so we maintain some sanity. There may be other parameters where this is an issue, but those can be added later as they are found. For the moment any inconsistencies are soft-fails. A failure message will be printed, but the return value will not be affected so we can add the tool without first having to fix every divergent parameter definition in tripleo-heat-templates (and there appear to be plenty). This will allow us to gradually fix the parameters over time, and once that is done we can make this a hard-fail. Change-Id: Ib8b2cb5e610022d2bbcec9f2e2d30d9a7c2be511 Partial-Bug: 1700664
Diffstat (limited to 'tools')
-rwxr-xr-xtools/yaml-validate.py75
1 files changed, 71 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/tools/yaml-validate.py b/tools/yaml-validate.py
index ff215fba..396998a0 100755
--- a/tools/yaml-validate.py
+++ b/tools/yaml-validate.py
@@ -39,6 +39,19 @@ OPTIONAL_DOCKER_SECTIONS = ['docker_puppet_tasks', 'upgrade_tasks',
REQUIRED_DOCKER_PUPPET_CONFIG_SECTIONS = ['config_volume', 'step_config',
'config_image']
OPTIONAL_DOCKER_PUPPET_CONFIG_SECTIONS = [ 'puppet_tags' ]
+# Mapping of parameter names to a list of the fields we should _not_ enforce
+# consistency across files on. This should only contain parameters whose
+# definition we cannot change for backwards compatibility reasons. New
+# parameters to the templates should not be added to this list.
+PARAMETER_DEFINITION_EXCLUSIONS = {'ManagementNetCidr': ['default'],
+ 'ManagementAllocationPools': ['default'],
+ 'ExternalNetCidr': ['default'],
+ 'ExternalAllocationPools': ['default'],
+ 'StorageNetCidr': ['default'],
+ 'StorageAllocationPools': ['default'],
+ 'StorageMgmtNetCidr': ['default'],
+ 'StorageMgmtAllocationPools': ['default'],
+ }
def exit_usage():
@@ -211,7 +224,30 @@ def validate_service(filename, tpl):
return 0
-def validate(filename):
+def validate(filename, param_map):
+ """Validate a Heat template
+
+ :param filename: The path to the file to validate
+ :param param_map: A dict which will be populated with the details of the
+ parameters in the template. The dict will have the
+ following structure:
+
+ {'ParameterName': [
+ {'filename': ./file1.yaml,
+ 'data': {'description': '',
+ 'type': string,
+ 'default': '',
+ ...}
+ },
+ {'filename': ./file2.yaml,
+ 'data': {'description': '',
+ 'type': string,
+ 'default': '',
+ ...}
+ },
+ ...
+ ]}
+ """
print('Validating %s' % filename)
retval = 0
try:
@@ -240,7 +276,9 @@ def validate(filename):
return 1
# yaml is OK, now walk the parameters and output a warning for unused ones
if 'heat_template_version' in tpl:
- for p in tpl.get('parameters', {}):
+ for p, data in tpl.get('parameters', {}).items():
+ definition = {'data': data, 'filename': filename}
+ param_map.setdefault(p, []).append(definition)
if p in required_params:
continue
str_p = '\'%s\'' % p
@@ -260,6 +298,7 @@ exit_val = 0
failed_files = []
base_endpoint_map = None
env_endpoint_maps = list()
+param_map = {}
for base_path in path_args:
if os.path.isdir(base_path):
@@ -267,7 +306,7 @@ for base_path in path_args:
for f in files:
if f.endswith('.yaml') and not f.endswith('.j2.yaml'):
file_path = os.path.join(subdir, f)
- failed = validate(file_path)
+ failed = validate(file_path, param_map)
if failed:
failed_files.append(file_path)
exit_val |= failed
@@ -278,7 +317,7 @@ for base_path in path_args:
if env_endpoint_map:
env_endpoint_maps.append(env_endpoint_map)
elif os.path.isfile(base_path) and base_path.endswith('.yaml'):
- failed = validate(base_path)
+ failed = validate(base_path, param_map)
if failed:
failed_files.append(base_path)
exit_val |= failed
@@ -310,6 +349,34 @@ else:
failed_files.extend(set(envs_containing_endpoint_map) - matched_files)
exit_val |= 1
+# Validate that duplicate parameters defined in multiple files all have the
+# same definition.
+mismatch_count = 0
+for p, defs in param_map.items():
+ # Nothing to validate if the parameter is only defined once
+ if len(defs) == 1:
+ continue
+ check_data = [d['data'] for d in defs]
+ # Override excluded fields so they don't affect the result
+ exclusions = PARAMETER_DEFINITION_EXCLUSIONS.get(p, [])
+ ex_dict = {}
+ for field in exclusions:
+ ex_dict[field] = 'IGNORED'
+ for d in check_data:
+ d.update(ex_dict)
+ # If all items in the list are not == the first, then the check fails
+ if check_data.count(check_data[0]) != len(check_data):
+ mismatch_count += 1
+ # TODO(bnemec): Make this a hard failure once all the templates have
+ # been fixed.
+ #exit_val |= 1
+ #failed_files.extend([d['filename'] for d in defs])
+ print('Mismatched parameter definitions found for "%s"' % p)
+ print('Definitions found:')
+ for d in defs:
+ print(' %s:\n %s' % (d['filename'], d['data']))
+print('Mismatched parameter definitions: %d' % mismatch_count)
+
if failed_files:
print('Validation failed on:')
for f in failed_files: